<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<posthistory>
  <row Id="1" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1" RevisionGUID="d0bc1730-92a9-4dcc-ac50-437600eba29a" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:10:37.963" UserId="1339" Text="For Super User how tolerant of answers with just links to a blog post with the answer are we supposed to be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On meta.stackoverflow.com I've seen conflicting opinions;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some say we shouldn't:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * [Why Linking is Bad](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7515/why-is-linking-bad)&#xD;&#xA;  * [Is Downvoting Link Only Answers Acceptable](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15625/is-downvoting-link-only-answers-acceptable)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Others say it's fine:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  * [How to refer to your blog when answering](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/20531/how-to-refer-to-your-blog-when-answering)" />
  <row Id="2" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1" RevisionGUID="d0bc1730-92a9-4dcc-ac50-437600eba29a" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:10:37.963" UserId="1339" Text="Best way to handle answers with just links in them?" />
  <row Id="3" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1" RevisionGUID="d0bc1730-92a9-4dcc-ac50-437600eba29a" CreationDate="2010-07-21T20:10:37.963" UserId="1339" Text="&lt;self-promotion&gt;&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;faq-proposal&gt;" />
  <row Id="4" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="3" RevisionGUID="691653dd-cebf-4284-ad18-28c1835377f6" CreationDate="2009-06-30T12:16:37.827" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="It is most likely going to be the place where we attempt to send all the junk we don't want clogging up StackOverflow and ServerFault. You can drawn your own conclusions about how that's going to turn out for SuperUser itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will definitely have the highest Noise to Signal ratio out of the three because of it's free-for-all nature." />
  <row Id="5" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="4" RevisionGUID="82bbeea9-a64b-43e5-8087-4c2485eb924c" CreationDate="2009-06-30T12:18:22.017" UserDisplayName="ChrisF" Text="I will &quot;sign up&quot;. I did on ServerFault, but as I'm not a sys admin I can't really contribute there. I think I'll more likely to be able to answer the questions on SuperUser, but I'm also more likely to be annoyed with the number of questions that could be solved by the poster doing a Google search themselves." />
  <row Id="6" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="5" RevisionGUID="65e3e92f-4d1e-44a2-8771-063724f8b299" CreationDate="2009-06-30T13:00:42.900" UserDisplayName="Jonik" Text="I think it will be a cool experiment - very interesting to see what comes up when combining this concept with a wider variety of questions (which we certainly can expect) and overall more relaxed rules. After all, everyone seems to agree that the SO/SF software would be great for a lot more than programming/sysadmin questions.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Too early to say if *I* will be an active member - will have to see what it turns out like. But I am fairly sure that the site will develop an active, knowledgeable (and addicted?) userbase rapidly (like SO, and more so than SF); the reputation system and other features will make sure of that. And there will be no shortage of questions either, if the typical user experience will be anything like I suspect: &quot;get great answers to almost any computer question in 5-10 minutes&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(* Which makes me wonder if we'll see an übersite some day where you can ask *anything*, from any walk of life... :) The problem would obviously be getting experts from every field to the same place.)" />
  <row Id="7" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="6" RevisionGUID="3f52b0e8-9f58-4957-bd25-491847cb234c" CreationDate="2009-06-30T13:49:25.653" UserDisplayName="Zack Peterson" Text="Right now, I've got nowhere to ask my computer questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I've got a programming issue, then Stack Overflow works great. But because I'm not a cable monkey, Server Fault thumbs its nose at me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[A moderator closed this question regarding screen resolutions as &quot;not sysadmin related&quot;.][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the &quot;rules&quot; of Server Fault should be relaxed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And since that's not likely, Super User might fill that gap.  I don't understand Jeff's &quot;Anything goes!&quot; and  &quot;Ewoks!&quot; attitude, though.  I hope he's not trying to make it silly and useless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/questions/1504/where-can-i-ask-questions-that-arent-it-questions/10806#10806" />
  <row Id="8" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="7" RevisionGUID="c5153746-44fb-41b2-a387-70d6b1c5d343" CreationDate="2009-06-30T15:34:42.950" UserDisplayName="Damien" Text="I already have some ideas of the topics that would be good, one or two I may ask (I am currently looking for a monitor/tv and recommendations are good). I think a large scope will make this site more fun, and as long as it has careful moderation it will not turn into Yahoo answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But Zack is right, It's gonna be awesome to have a Stack Overflow for computer questions. " />
  <row Id="9" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="9" RevisionGUID="2fc7892d-0084-4c7d-a6d5-1d7a2e0f0efb" CreationDate="2009-06-30T16:57:27.337" UserDisplayName="rascher" Text="SO and Severfault got their user base, which is a pretty apt one, by saying &quot;Hey, the other helpsites aren't very good, and we can improve. A lot of smart people who read our blogs, so here, we invite you to join our site.&quot; I would suspect, then, that for the first n months, questions will be pretty good because the user base will mainly be the people who are already active on SO and Serverfault.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Over time, as more people come on board, it isn't inconceivable that we'll start seeing Yahoo-answers type problems: unclear questions, scant on details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many forums try to combat this by having a sticky &quot;FAQ&quot; thread, in which they take common questions and post them at the top, along with links to the relevant posts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The other thing that happens is that people ask questions and nobody knows. This happens a lot when searching (for example) the Ubuntu forums - lots of problems specific to someone's hardware and video chip, and plenty of people who have the same problem, but nobody who has an answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what is yet to be seen is this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Many forums have posts which say &quot;I have this problem too! Does anyone have a solution yet?&quot; Does the upvoting metaphor accomplish the same thing?&#xD;&#xA;2. Is upvoting an effective way to actually get someone to investigate the issue at hand?&#xD;&#xA;3. Will bounties and reputation also increase the chances of finding a good answer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We know that this (usually) works for code-related questions. But taking the time to explain scheduling to someone when you already understand the concepts is different from doing the necessary research to figure out a display-driver problem. Of course, I say things like that because, to me, many of these things are a complete mystery.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my hope is that, in contrast to ubuntuforums, superuser will help experts come out of the woodwork. But right now... its hard for me to even conceive that such experts exist!" />
  <row Id="10" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="8" RevisionGUID="901d643b-7d2e-4c38-b173-c3bb880fe2df" CreationDate="2009-06-30T16:05:36.683" UserDisplayName="scunliffe" Text="Not so sure on the answers part - but I have a stack of questions to ask that are &quot;too lightweight&quot; to ask on server fault or are not directly related to programming.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g.&#xD;&#xA;a.) This might sound stupid... but I want to be able to (re)sort my tasks on the windows taskbar (e.g. move/drag tasks left/right) of others.&#xD;&#xA;b.) Why do most of my PCs offer no &quot;always do this&quot; option when I plug in my USB key, but this computer removes that checkbox/option.&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="11" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="10" RevisionGUID="96fac016-6e4b-43b9-aa86-3e704d42ac81" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:15:41.233" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="&gt; How do you think it will turn out?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Well... You know how every week or so, someone starts whining about how their favorite question on SO got closed or deleted or down-voted or unkind comments posted to it? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And how when they're informed that, strictly speaking, *&quot;What did you put on your resume to get a job where you could hang purple drapes in your private office... as a programmer?&quot;* isn't really *programming related*, they get all indignant and claim that this policy of requiring programming questions is *fascist* and could all be handled by judicious use of *tags* and an *army of people* to maintain them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SuperUser is the site that'll prove them right. Or not. " />
  <row Id="12" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="2" RevisionGUID="67b1f711-668f-4b83-9a6c-4d6d65f6c71f" CreationDate="2009-06-30T12:12:31.890" UserDisplayName="Damien" Text="I am quite looking forward to Superuser. I think it's going to be vastly bigger than Stack Overflow as it could attract many more users who may be less experienced in Internet discussions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand I imagine it's going to be more dynamic and have a wider variety of questions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you think it will turn out? Will you be a active member? " />
  <row Id="13" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="2" RevisionGUID="67b1f711-668f-4b83-9a6c-4d6d65f6c71f" CreationDate="2009-06-30T12:12:31.890" UserDisplayName="Damien" Text="Superuser - Will it be different?" />
  <row Id="14" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="2" RevisionGUID="67b1f711-668f-4b83-9a6c-4d6d65f6c71f" CreationDate="2009-06-30T12:12:31.890" UserDisplayName="Damien" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;new-users&gt;&lt;community&gt;" />
  <row Id="15" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="2" RevisionGUID="437dc701-9858-4db4-bed3-f76d8b7c0c2f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:36.030" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/1049/superuser-will-it-be-different" Text="" />
  <row Id="16" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="12" RevisionGUID="cc45672a-63f1-4101-9197-86845c0dea11" CreationDate="2009-07-02T14:20:04.627" UserDisplayName="Thomas Owens" Text="I think it might have to do with the [other name for root][1]. I suppose they could have called it root...but that would have sucked, IMO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That, and yes, it begins with an S and has a nice acronym (SU). IIRC, the su in the nix [sudo command][2] means superuser...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it's just nice all around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_user&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudo" />
  <row Id="17" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="13" RevisionGUID="5afd31e9-22d7-41d7-a6b8-9b95b2e65cb5" CreationDate="2009-07-02T14:32:59.477" UserDisplayName="Michael Pryor" Text="But shouldn't superuser (which is the other name for root) be the name for what we currently call serverfault?  I mean if that site is for sysadmins, superuser seems appropriate, whereas a site for the common &quot;Internet Explorer is broken&quot; type questions seems like we're giving them too much credit by calling them *super* users." />
  <row Id="18" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="15" RevisionGUID="8a2d07be-1f25-4f33-91ee-7271cf14179f" CreationDate="2009-07-02T14:35:58.677" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Aside from SuperUser being an incredibly easy name to remember (good for business), it also gives off the impression that there are plenty of super users out there who know how to answer all your questions in lightning fast time." />
  <row Id="19" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="16" RevisionGUID="2c394cb7-955c-4022-82df-12b4652cc624" CreationDate="2009-07-13T19:03:45.807" UserDisplayName="bobobobo" Text="SuperUser is a good name.  But what about SuperN00b?" />
  <row Id="20" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="18" RevisionGUID="fc45f0bd-d9d1-4127-8ae9-430097a0a842" CreationDate="2009-07-14T01:10:09.053" UserDisplayName="Will" Text="Based on the Stackoverflow podcast (#59 or #60) Jeff was okay with Superuser breaking from the consistency of StackOverflow and ServerFault.  He particularly talked about being okay with the inconsistent icon.  It stands to reason that the thinking would extend to other aspects of the site (the title, we'll see where the other inconsistencies are)." />
  <row Id="21" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="19" RevisionGUID="a1b10035-72af-4dc3-acff-c017b7112c62" CreationDate="2009-07-14T01:28:45.980" UserDisplayName="Steven A. Lowe" Text="lusers.com was taken" />
  <row Id="22" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="14" RevisionGUID="d5137bc0-5ff2-471b-9fe0-c9025eaf2cee" CreationDate="2009-07-02T14:34:29.287" UserDisplayName="gnovice" Text="If they wanted to keep with the &quot;failure&quot; theme of the names for StackOverflow and ServerFault, they probably would have had to call SuperUser &quot;BlueScreenOfDeath&quot;. =) Not as catchy as SuperUser, IMO." />
  <row Id="23" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="17" RevisionGUID="1a5e2f9b-3a84-4e3a-b89f-2ac052aaefc6" CreationDate="2009-07-13T22:34:24.997" UserDisplayName="Joe Schmoe" Text="Ultimately, for an internet site, doesn't it come down to a tradeoff between a name that describes what a website does versus the domain names that are available to be used?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In some of my other website ventures, I am often driven to choose a name simply because I can find a .com, .net or .org that is still available." />
  <row Id="24" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="20" RevisionGUID="36b1a9fc-f70b-481b-9b3b-079a4da7e76b" CreationDate="2009-07-14T09:47:55.360" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="Don't you wanna feel like a SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="25" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="21" RevisionGUID="471b561f-c0a9-4d38-9b29-50e6d3524cfc" CreationDate="2009-07-31T09:19:19.693" UserDisplayName="facepalmd" Text="Apparently UserError.com must not have been available. :-)" />
  <row Id="26" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="22" RevisionGUID="49edc8e3-8b4b-4b54-a5e6-fd43baaaf698" CreationDate="2010-04-06T09:03:40.497" UserDisplayName="ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells" Text="IIRC it was substantially because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Joel and Jeff found or knew someone that owned the domain superuser.com and would sell it to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 2. The domain was fairly appropriate to the subject matter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... with (1) being a constraint on the options they actually had it was the best choice available to them." />
  <row Id="27" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="11" RevisionGUID="99874584-ccd7-4e06-8b54-59bbb67ebdda" CreationDate="2009-07-02T14:15:24.293" UserDisplayName="AlbertoPL" Text="StackOverflow and ServerFault are both clearly problems in their respective fields. As such, why is SuperUser to be called SuperUser? Is it because it too begins with an S? What were other names that were under consideration?" />
  <row Id="28" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="11" RevisionGUID="99874584-ccd7-4e06-8b54-59bbb67ebdda" CreationDate="2009-07-02T14:15:24.293" UserDisplayName="AlbertoPL" Text="Why Call It Superuser?" />
  <row Id="29" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="11" RevisionGUID="99874584-ccd7-4e06-8b54-59bbb67ebdda" CreationDate="2009-07-02T14:15:24.293" UserDisplayName="AlbertoPL" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="30" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="11" RevisionGUID="a2f7f9b3-da5a-49ae-baab-29668063d731" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:37.720" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/1838/why-call-it-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="31" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="24" RevisionGUID="448243fe-0e3a-4f49-a529-3bbee3311028" CreationDate="2009-07-14T19:05:44.083" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="Good find! But that black-backed &quot;0 answers&quot; thing sticks out like a sore thumb. Can you post some other pages as well (viewing a question, user list, etc)?" />
  <row Id="32" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="25" RevisionGUID="6174aa38-879d-4d50-a558-a8bee8d8a78a" CreationDate="2009-07-14T19:06:38.130" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="You'd better Greasemonkey up a way for me to get in there or I will cry." />
  <row Id="33" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="26" RevisionGUID="a1a05556-9f5b-40e9-b1cf-a3c04d7afa04" CreationDate="2009-07-14T19:40:35.527" UserDisplayName="Chester" Text="Can you make this with a drop down so we can pick a theme for meta, so, sf, and su?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if I would change the logo in the script, but the colors, amazing!" />
  <row Id="34" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="27" RevisionGUID="2058950d-3c27-44a1-9302-59b8aca16144" CreationDate="2009-07-14T19:52:25.993" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="I have to say, I'm *really* liking the new theme. From the slight blue highlight for interesting questions to the purple comment scores, I think that Jeff has a winner here. I like it so much that I don't want to go back to the cold gray that's the default here." />
  <row Id="35" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="29" RevisionGUID="3bcf5ba5-7123-44f0-a72e-2cc47b9a823e" CreationDate="2009-07-14T20:57:15.903" UserDisplayName="Chester" Text="I've modified your script a weeeee bit and combined it with a modified navigation one...  It'll default the theme to whatever the site's theme is, but clicking the colored boxes at the top of the screen changes themes accordingly...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    function changeTheme(url)&#xD;&#xA;    {&#xD;&#xA;    	for( i = 0; (l = document.getElementsByTagName(&quot;link&quot;)[i]); i++ ) {&#xD;&#xA;    	    if( l.getAttribute(&quot;rel&quot;).indexOf(&quot;style&quot;) &gt;= 0 ) l.disabled = true;&#xD;&#xA;    	}&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	var link = window.document.createElement('link');&#xD;&#xA;    	link.rel = 'stylesheet';&#xD;&#xA;    	link.type = 'text/css';&#xD;&#xA;    	link.href = url;&#xD;&#xA;    	document.getElementsByTagName(&quot;HEAD&quot;)[0].appendChild(link);&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    (function(){&#xD;&#xA;      function GM_wait() {&#xD;&#xA;        if(typeof unsafeWindow.jQuery == 'undefined') { &#xD;&#xA;          window.setTimeout(GM_wait,100); &#xD;&#xA;        } else { &#xD;&#xA;          $ = unsafeWindow.jQuery; letsJQuery(); &#xD;&#xA;        }&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;      GM_wait();&#xD;&#xA;      function letsJQuery() {&#xD;&#xA;        $('#hlinks')&#xD;&#xA;          .prepend('&lt;span class=&quot;link-separator&quot;&gt; | &lt;/span&gt;')&#xD;&#xA;    	  .prepend(&quot;&lt;a href='http://meta.stackoverflow.com'&gt;&lt;img src='http://meta.stackoverflow.com/favicon.ico' title='Visit Meta Stack Overflow' style='padding:1px'&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;          .prepend('&lt;span class=&quot;link-separator&quot;&gt; | &lt;/span&gt;')&#xD;&#xA;    	  .prepend(&quot;&lt;a href='http://www.serverfault.com'&gt;&lt;img src='http://serverfault.com/favicon.ico' title='Visit ServerFault' style='padding:1px'&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;          .prepend('&lt;span class=&quot;link-separator&quot;&gt; | &lt;/span&gt;')&#xD;&#xA;    	  .prepend(&quot;&lt;a href='http://dev.superuser.com'&gt;&lt;img src='http://dev.superuser.com/favicon.ico' title='Visit SuperUser' style='padding:1px'&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    	  .prepend('&lt;span class=&quot;link-separator&quot;&gt; | &lt;/span&gt;')&#xD;&#xA;          .prepend(&quot;&lt;a href='http://www.stackoverflow.com'&gt;&lt;img src='http://stackoverflow.com/favicon.ico' title='StackOverflow' style='padding:1px'&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    	  .prepend('&lt;span class=&quot;link-separator&quot;&gt; | &lt;/span&gt;')&#xD;&#xA;    	  .prepend(&quot;&lt;a id='mtheme' href='#' style='position:relative;top:1px;display:inline-block;width:10px;height:10px;background:#ccc;margin-right:1px;' title='Meta Theme'&gt;&lt;span style='display:none'&gt;meta.stackoverflow&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;          .prepend(&quot;&lt;a id='sftheme' href='#' style='position:relative;top:1px;display:inline-block;width:10px;height:10px;background:#c99;margin-right:7px' title='Server Fault Theme'&gt;&lt;span style='display:none'&gt;serverfault&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;          .prepend(&quot;&lt;a id='sutheme' href='#' style='position:relative;top:1px;display:inline-block;width:10px;height:10px;background:#00ADED;margin-right:7px' title='Super User Theme'&gt;&lt;span style='display:none'&gt;superuser&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;          .prepend(&quot;&lt;a id='sotheme' href='#' style='position:relative;top:1px;display:inline-block;width:10px;height:10px;background:#f60;margin-right:7px' title='Stack Overflow Theme'&gt;&lt;span style='display:none'&gt;stackoverflow&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    	$('#sotheme').bind(&quot;click&quot;, function() {&#xD;&#xA;    		changeTheme('http://stackoverflow.com/content/all.css');&#xD;&#xA;    		return false;&#xD;&#xA;    	});&#xD;&#xA;    	$('#sftheme').bind(&quot;click&quot;, function() {&#xD;&#xA;    		changeTheme('http://serverfault.com/content/all.css');&#xD;&#xA;    		return false;&#xD;&#xA;    	});&#xD;&#xA;    	$('#mtheme').bind(&quot;click&quot;, function() {&#xD;&#xA;    		changeTheme('http://meta.stackoverflow.com/content/all.css');&#xD;&#xA;    		return false;&#xD;&#xA;    	});&#xD;&#xA;    	$('#sutheme').bind(&quot;click&quot;, function() {&#xD;&#xA;    		changeTheme('http://dev.superuser.com/content/all.css');&#xD;&#xA;    		return false;&#xD;&#xA;    	});&#xD;&#xA;      }&#xD;&#xA;    })();&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The ServerFault theme is currently not working very well... Not sure why...  I would also like to figure out a way for the GM script to remember what your last theme selection was so it could persist for future clicks." />
  <row Id="36" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="28" RevisionGUID="174b17d4-3521-45de-97c4-56b16c6574f4" CreationDate="2009-07-14T19:56:22.443" UserDisplayName="Kip" Text="*Anything* would look like an improvement after looking at the metaSO theme for a few days. :)" />
  <row Id="37" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="23" RevisionGUID="3065c00c-02a8-4ec6-9f57-c7aed5a879b2" CreationDate="2009-07-14T19:38:48.490" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="Want to browse Meta with the upcoming SuperUser stylesheet/logo?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    // ==UserScript==&#xD;&#xA;    // @name           not-so super user&#xD;&#xA;    // @namespace      soflow&#xD;&#xA;    // @include        *meta.stackoverflow.com*&#xD;&#xA;    // ==/UserScript==&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    for( i = 0; (l = document.getElementsByTagName(&quot;link&quot;)[i]); i++ ) {&#xD;&#xA;    	if( l.getAttribute(&quot;rel&quot;).indexOf(&quot;style&quot;) &gt;= 0 ) l.disabled = true;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    var link = window.document.createElement('link');&#xD;&#xA;    link.rel = 'stylesheet';&#xD;&#xA;    link.type = 'text/css';&#xD;&#xA;    link.href = 'http://dev.superuser.com/content/all.css?v=3959';&#xD;&#xA;    document.getElementsByTagName(&quot;HEAD&quot;)[0].appendChild(link);&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    var logoImage = document.getElementById(&quot;hlogo&quot;).getElementsByTagName(&quot;img&quot;)[0];&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    logoImage.src = &quot;http://dev.superuser.com/content/img/su/logo.png&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    logoImage.width = &quot;250&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;    logoImage.height = &quot;60&quot;;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sampsonresume.com/labs/su-big.gif" />
  <row Id="38" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="23" RevisionGUID="3065c00c-02a8-4ec6-9f57-c7aed5a879b2" CreationDate="2009-07-14T19:38:48.490" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="Want to browse Meta with the upcoming SuperUser stylesheet/logo?  " />
  <row Id="39" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="23" RevisionGUID="3065c00c-02a8-4ec6-9f57-c7aed5a879b2" CreationDate="2009-07-14T19:38:48.490" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;greasemonkey&gt;" />
  <row Id="40" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="23" RevisionGUID="89477f4e-7089-4858-8f45-bcbdbb7b135a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:39.313" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5353/want-to-browse-meta-with-the-upcoming-superuser-stylesheet-logo" Text="" />
  <row Id="41" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="31" RevisionGUID="3b425ae1-4a3f-47c1-80c9-d996e7f21f01" CreationDate="2009-07-14T21:37:17.977" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="The colors are peaceful and soothing." />
  <row Id="42" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="32" RevisionGUID="2cad361d-f432-4b7b-83eb-5f6284ab6711" CreationDate="2009-07-14T21:37:54.377" UserDisplayName="cletus" Text="Personally I think the logo is uninspiring and the blue and black is a bit... old-fashioned. The blue in the mock up (if accurate) is not attractive." />
  <row Id="43" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="34" RevisionGUID="c95fc868-f191-478c-9a6d-13bc92e63e98" CreationDate="2009-07-14T21:43:39.510" UserDisplayName="Andy Mikula" Text="I like the logo - in fact, seeing as it was chosen by a vote, I'm betting that the majority of initial users will as well. I would've picked a bit of a paler blue, but maybe my eyes are just a bit too used to the soothing greys of Meta." />
  <row Id="44" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="35" RevisionGUID="49228cba-e255-4478-b142-b92d2a03e3c9" CreationDate="2009-07-15T19:30:26.043" UserDisplayName="Peter Turner" Text="I'm not a big fan, I just about asked &quot;why does the superuser logo suck?&quot; on here.  I suppose a lot of people liked it though, so that wouldn't be nice. I like the colors.  I don't think that guy looks super, he looks pretty glum." />
  <row Id="45" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="33" RevisionGUID="586afa79-60b5-40dd-92b2-db0903fcfa35" CreationDate="2009-07-14T21:40:11.537" UserDisplayName="Jeff Yates" Text="I like it, somewhat. I find the colours pleasing to the eye, inviting, and friendly. However, the ['} seems a little too dotcom for me - like the logos of the long forgotten websites of the dotcom boom and bust era.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Out of the options available for voting, it is undoubtedly the best option, but I think there could be better. However, I'm no graphic designer or marketing guru, so I doubt I could improve on it much. Unlike Stack Overflow and Server Fault, I find it hard to conceptualize the name to an image for Super User - all that springs to mind is a needle and I think that's the wrong message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I should add that I wasn't around to take part in the vote and therefore, probably am not worthy to comment, but [the logo with a cursor inside a star][1] seems a better image to go next to the current text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, it's important to give due reverence to the declarations made when the vote was announced where Jeff stated:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I do not put a lot of stock in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; crowdsourcing design feedback (the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; poll winner may not “win”), but it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; will factor some in our final&#xD;&#xA;&gt; decision.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, I doubt this thread matters much other than as a place to vent at our inability to effect a change.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://img3.crowdspring.com/var/crowdspring/storage/images/projects/graphic_design/logo/logo_for_superuser_com/gallery/superuser__108/image_superuser/10636397-1-eng-US/image_superuser_gridview.jpg" />
  <row Id="46" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="33" RevisionGUID="586afa79-60b5-40dd-92b2-db0903fcfa35" CreationDate="2009-07-14T21:40:11.537" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="47" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="36" RevisionGUID="035edb9b-60c6-4b64-910c-43be8bbf3de1" CreationDate="2009-07-16T08:23:14.547" UserDisplayName="Amr ElGarhy" Text="I liked the colors and like the logo too much, just one thing i don't like about the logo that its not in the same way as his brothers &quot;SO,SF&quot;" />
  <row Id="48" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="37" RevisionGUID="4ab40a50-b522-442c-829a-5692d9e59ea3" CreationDate="2009-07-16T10:29:30.227" UserDisplayName="Bruce McLeod" Text="I like the colours and style of the site, but I don't like the logo." />
  <row Id="49" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="38" RevisionGUID="55dadce1-6bef-4fd7-9c92-e29894e5667f" CreationDate="2009-07-16T11:12:17.707" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I voted for the logo and I still like it. Jeff made the decision process extremely visible on the blog. I find SuperUser exciting, having been on ServerFault and StackOverflow for a while. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="50" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="30" RevisionGUID="1e4c4e73-eef8-49be-b185-ae118d94869f" CreationDate="2009-07-14T21:35:43.980" UserDisplayName="cletus" Text="Based on the comments in [superuser.com Logo Vote][1] and this [mock up][2] I thought it worth canvassing opinions on the subject.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/06/superuser-com-logo-vote/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5353/want-to-browse-meta-with-the-upcoming-superuser-stylesheet-logo" />
  <row Id="51" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="30" RevisionGUID="1e4c4e73-eef8-49be-b185-ae118d94869f" CreationDate="2009-07-14T21:35:43.980" UserDisplayName="cletus" Text="Thoughts on the new superuser logo and theme?" />
  <row Id="52" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="30" RevisionGUID="1e4c4e73-eef8-49be-b185-ae118d94869f" CreationDate="2009-07-14T21:35:43.980" UserDisplayName="cletus" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;style&gt;&lt;logo&gt;" />
  <row Id="53" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="30" RevisionGUID="948a6b58-a2e5-4df7-b084-4c7fd9cb7d81" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:41.267" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5380/thoughts-on-the-new-superuser-logo-and-theme" Text="" />
  <row Id="54" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="40" RevisionGUID="c3f0ec61-e110-43a9-b344-6b85dc616f94" CreationDate="2009-07-15T07:20:28.727" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="Don't worry about it. Go on and create a new account. Then, in the accounts tab of your profile, associate your SU account with one of your other accounts and you can copy your profile information over." />
  <row Id="55" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="41" RevisionGUID="3bce3c46-6d42-4094-b8fc-f826327bc03a" CreationDate="2009-07-16T08:23:42.063" Text="We improved the message so it now says&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This is an OpenID we haven't seen on {website name} before:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But Kyle's answer, above is 100% correct." />
  <row Id="56" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="39" RevisionGUID="bc42fad4-82d8-4086-8d9b-0afe3c08f0dd" CreationDate="2009-07-15T07:10:09.470" UserDisplayName="Ladybug Killer" Text="My account works pretty well on the other three sites.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when I log on to Super User, I get:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;This is an OpenID we haven't seen before: [openid]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What gives?" />
  <row Id="57" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="39" RevisionGUID="bc42fad4-82d8-4086-8d9b-0afe3c08f0dd" CreationDate="2009-07-15T07:10:09.470" UserDisplayName="Ladybug Killer" Text="This is an OpenID we haven't seen before" />
  <row Id="58" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="39" RevisionGUID="bc42fad4-82d8-4086-8d9b-0afe3c08f0dd" CreationDate="2009-07-15T07:10:09.470" UserDisplayName="Ladybug Killer" Text="&lt;openid&gt;" />
  <row Id="59" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="39" RevisionGUID="cbda7de0-3610-4277-832b-933238fa65f7" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:41.960" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5478/this-is-an-openid-we-havent-seen-before" Text="" />
  <row Id="60" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="43" RevisionGUID="ebdf8cdd-d0e1-4c14-8a73-2d48eba06a75" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:15:29.480" Text="view increments are buffered up and written to the database in batches of (n) size, where (n) is a configuration option." />
  <row Id="61" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="42" RevisionGUID="fbe61e5e-2d49-4fce-9fe3-8a4ce0cd11f9" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:14:19.837" UserDisplayName="John the Seagull" Text="![1 vote, 0 views][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/9850/dibujoauo.jpg" />
  <row Id="62" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="42" RevisionGUID="fbe61e5e-2d49-4fce-9fe3-8a4ce0cd11f9" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:14:19.837" UserDisplayName="John the Seagull" Text="SuperUser votes/views mismatch (or it loves Jon Skeet already!)" />
  <row Id="63" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="42" RevisionGUID="fbe61e5e-2d49-4fce-9fe3-8a4ce0cd11f9" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:14:19.837" UserDisplayName="John the Seagull" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;jon-skeet&gt;" />
  <row Id="64" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="42" RevisionGUID="1212e761-5332-4e65-8fe0-42f66f5e32d8" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:42.297" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5507/superuser-votes-views-mismatch-or-it-loves-jon-skeet-already" Text="" />
  <row Id="65" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="45" RevisionGUID="314e9ac7-2dcd-459a-b647-ed216bf24759" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:29:04.057" UserDisplayName="Josh" Text="can we add an auto bot to add that as the first answer to any question containing keywords such as 'frozen', 'stuck', 'blue screen', etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Josh" />
  <row Id="66" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="46" RevisionGUID="618f58c6-24c3-4d9c-a032-2e01b1b68764" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:29:23.567" UserDisplayName="David M" Text="Suggest there is just an automatically posted answer after a 10 second delay suggesting this..." />
  <row Id="67" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="47" RevisionGUID="ba4e1c3c-8271-491f-bc23-aacf8beb7e09" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:30:55.190" UserDisplayName="Colonel Sponsz" Text="&gt; You cannot fix a machine by just power-cycling it with no understanding of what is going wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tom Knight" />
  <row Id="68" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="48" RevisionGUID="1c0187a2-ddaf-4ae9-bee7-980f55f48e99" CreationDate="2009-07-15T09:23:59.457" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="I'm predicting&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Sounds like a virus...my mom had that, I think.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Try control, alt, and delete maybe?" />
  <row Id="69" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="49" RevisionGUID="a551ceb5-d9a5-4136-a846-37d5cb9464a9" CreationDate="2009-07-15T12:56:52.837" UserDisplayName="crb" Text="You can get some insight into providing true helpdesk-quality answers online by reading [Roy's tech support on Twitter][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://twitter.com/roy_from_it/" />
  <row Id="70" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="44" RevisionGUID="3ba3241b-9841-4f9a-b421-babf99d9526e" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:25:16.677" UserDisplayName="Assaf" Text="Are the predictions on what percentage of the questions in superuser the solution would be to reboot?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm going to guess about 5%.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="71" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="44" RevisionGUID="3ba3241b-9841-4f9a-b421-babf99d9526e" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:25:16.677" UserDisplayName="Assaf" Text="Have you tried turning it off and on again?" />
  <row Id="72" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="44" RevisionGUID="3ba3241b-9841-4f9a-b421-babf99d9526e" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:25:16.677" UserDisplayName="Assaf" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="73" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="44" RevisionGUID="47e8e2bb-81bd-4842-a47a-18eeb648f907" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:42.600" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5513/have-you-tried-turning-it-off-and-on-again" Text="" />
  <row Id="74" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="51" RevisionGUID="7de7479d-bf0a-4cec-9809-a8a46c2926df" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:30:11.713" Text="superuser does not allow anonymous participation during the private beta. You must use an openid." />
  <row Id="75" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="50" RevisionGUID="24d84007-6d7b-41bd-895e-f806d232bf0a" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:27:48.117" UserDisplayName="Factor Mystic" Text="If you're not logged in, and attempt to post an answer, SU will prompt for an OpenID url, but the red text under that says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You must provide name and email, or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your OpenID&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't see any way to provide anything but OpenID url." />
  <row Id="76" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="50" RevisionGUID="24d84007-6d7b-41bd-895e-f806d232bf0a" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:27:48.117" UserDisplayName="Factor Mystic" Text="Not possible to enter name/email to post an answer when not logged in" />
  <row Id="77" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="50" RevisionGUID="24d84007-6d7b-41bd-895e-f806d232bf0a" CreationDate="2009-07-15T08:27:48.117" UserDisplayName="Factor Mystic" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;beta&gt;" />
  <row Id="78" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="50" RevisionGUID="186bbde9-955c-44d0-b537-44b4a2d81335" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:43.173" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5515/not-possible-to-enter-name-email-to-post-an-answer-when-not-logged-in" Text="" />
  <row Id="85" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="56" RevisionGUID="3ce65766-ae3e-43b3-a49f-eb0f0bcb1b5c" CreationDate="2009-07-15T10:16:08.310" UserDisplayName="Ralph Rickenbach" Text="Actually Facebook is adopting OpenID. It seems to pick up thrive. And once the user has set up a OpenId, it makes things easier for him not having to remember multiple passwords.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All we have to hope for is Google revisiting their faulty implementation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a question on SU about this, asking about [OpenId's future][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/505/is-there-a-real-future-for-openid" />
  <row Id="86" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="57" RevisionGUID="40f1362a-f212-43db-876d-5efb2652c636" CreationDate="2009-07-15T10:16:52.813" UserDisplayName="adrianbanks" Text="I don't think so. Most people have a Google/Yahoo/Flickr/blogger/LiveJournal account that will serve as an OpenID.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suspect that a lot of people will use the cookie method of logging in for limited use of the site, as Google will be their first point of contact with SU." />
  <row Id="87" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="58" RevisionGUID="075b3429-e514-497c-a514-01548a95f7bb" CreationDate="2009-07-15T10:25:49.753" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="It's not really rocket science to make an OpenID account.&#xD;&#xA;Currently there's a link to: http://openid.net/get/&#xD;&#xA;Where you can find links to several sites that have OpenIDs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only thing they could add is direct links to the (free) standalone OpenID providers for people who don't want to sign up at any of the large suppliers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I reckon most people that will come to Superuser will have an account that's on the list..." />
  <row Id="88" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="59" RevisionGUID="3461c2fa-0605-41ac-a7a0-abbd58cbba43" CreationDate="2009-07-15T11:17:41.343" UserDisplayName="Simon P Stevens" Text="You don't need to have an account to browse and post questions or answers. You only need a login for the more advanced participation, gaining rep, or keeping track of all your questions and answers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that bar is low enough. General users with a specific question can post it an get an answer without ever needing an OpenId." />
  <row Id="89" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="60" RevisionGUID="798112e2-6719-4b54-94f3-389bb7bfe8e5" CreationDate="2009-07-15T11:52:34.763" UserDisplayName="Abhinav" Text="The google and other &quot;popular&quot; login mechanisms could be made more prominent, to reduce confusion and concern on the logging method, which is too hi-tech for superuser users." />
  <row Id="90" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="55" RevisionGUID="3254366b-96fc-4059-a36f-73efdc7b8f3c" CreationDate="2009-07-15T10:12:02.157" UserDisplayName="DrFloyd5" Text="Should superuser.com users be able to log into the site w/o creating an openid? That seems a little advanced. Maybe the least technical of the SO trilogy should have the least technical entry requirements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When SO was built, Jeff and Crew went with OpenID because it was expected to have a more sophisticated audience of programmers. SuperUser.com clearly is not targeted at that group. Should the the openid decision be rethough?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="91" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="55" RevisionGUID="3254366b-96fc-4059-a36f-73efdc7b8f3c" CreationDate="2009-07-15T10:12:02.157" UserDisplayName="DrFloyd5" Text="Is asking a user participating in SuperUser.com to have an open id unrealistic?" />
  <row Id="92" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="55" RevisionGUID="3254366b-96fc-4059-a36f-73efdc7b8f3c" CreationDate="2009-07-15T10:12:02.157" UserDisplayName="DrFloyd5" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;openid&gt;" />
  <row Id="93" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="55" RevisionGUID="24d2d8b4-d621-4584-90b6-fa6bb2391cfc" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:43.640" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5540/is-asking-a-user-participating-in-superuser-com-to-have-an-open-id-unrealistic" Text="" />
  <row Id="94" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="62" RevisionGUID="0de93a82-f7dd-42de-9f78-aa1ad3ef3419" CreationDate="2009-07-15T11:59:54.403" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="I love the SU Colors." />
  <row Id="95" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="64" RevisionGUID="63d2f3aa-c7be-4ff8-80db-ed162ddd7acc" CreationDate="2009-07-15T12:06:30.820" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="I see mostly blue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like blue." />
  <row Id="96" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="65" RevisionGUID="00945bde-d45d-460b-a1de-548c469366d6" CreationDate="2009-07-15T13:30:29.010" UserDisplayName="Mr. Shiny and New" Text="I think the SuperUser colours are way better than Serverfault or Meta.  Ok, Jeff hates Meta, so it gets the ugly scheme.  Fine, I can deal with that.  But Serverfault... blech.  SuperUser has a nice theme IMO." />
  <row Id="97" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="65" RevisionGUID="00945bde-d45d-460b-a1de-548c469366d6" CreationDate="2009-07-15T13:30:29.010" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="98" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="66" RevisionGUID="a2310802-90eb-4d30-afd0-bb7cb5bcf912" CreationDate="2009-07-15T13:36:50.013" UserDisplayName="kd304" Text="Looks medieval. Try white on white." />
  <row Id="99" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="66" RevisionGUID="a2310802-90eb-4d30-afd0-bb7cb5bcf912" CreationDate="2009-07-15T13:36:50.013" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="67" RevisionGUID="8093fafa-d079-4230-bae6-d60bf0527a4e" CreationDate="2009-07-15T13:39:19.383" UserDisplayName="Jorn" Text="I like it better than the gray Meta look..." />
  <row Id="101" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="67" RevisionGUID="8093fafa-d079-4230-bae6-d60bf0527a4e" CreationDate="2009-07-15T13:39:19.383" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="68" RevisionGUID="83ca8964-ea69-4a14-80d2-4f8a21d65efc" CreationDate="2009-07-15T13:42:53.290" UserDisplayName="cletus" Text="Pretty much duplicate of [Thoughts on the new superuser logo and theme?][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer your question, I think the colour scheme garish, even hideous.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5380/thoughts-on-the-new-superuser-logo-and-theme" />
  <row Id="103" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="68" RevisionGUID="83ca8964-ea69-4a14-80d2-4f8a21d65efc" CreationDate="2009-07-15T13:42:53.290" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="104" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="69" RevisionGUID="6be27cfc-41a7-4090-b8d1-dbd7312b338c" CreationDate="2009-07-15T14:07:27.667" UserDisplayName="theycallmemorty" Text="I really don't like the bubbles around the tag names.  It makes them stand out too much, IMO." />
  <row Id="105" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="69" RevisionGUID="6be27cfc-41a7-4090-b8d1-dbd7312b338c" CreationDate="2009-07-15T14:07:27.667" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="70" RevisionGUID="f23d521b-06ba-4b62-99cd-288ae8712777" CreationDate="2009-07-15T14:31:43.523" UserDisplayName="Ralph Rickenbach" Text="There is one drawback with a blue scheme. Older people, discriminating myself here by giving a specific age boundry at about 40-45, tend to have difficulties distinguishing different shades of blue." />
  <row Id="107" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="70" RevisionGUID="f23d521b-06ba-4b62-99cd-288ae8712777" CreationDate="2009-07-15T14:31:43.523" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="63" RevisionGUID="7885f0f5-03e0-42d9-903b-b7e0ff55f379" CreationDate="2009-07-15T12:05:33.310" UserDisplayName="hmemcpy" Text="You probably mean for questions with accepted answer. I find nothing &quot;offensive&quot; about that color.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![not poo][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i28.tinypic.com/9i8uoo.png" />
  <row Id="109" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="61" RevisionGUID="1a2e80fa-d79c-4c5c-b684-d928b363fdc4" CreationDate="2009-07-15T11:53:37.507" UserDisplayName="Aidan Ryan" Text="I find it offensive: squarely in the baby-poo, vomit, etc category.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I'm referring to the background of the &quot;alert&quot; bar as well as the &quot;welcome&quot; box for not-logged-in users.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/5976/sumustard.png" />
  <row Id="110" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="61" RevisionGUID="1a2e80fa-d79c-4c5c-b684-d928b363fdc4" CreationDate="2009-07-15T11:53:37.507" UserDisplayName="Aidan Ryan" Text="Does anyone else hate the superuser &quot;mustard&quot; color?" />
  <row Id="111" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="61" RevisionGUID="1a2e80fa-d79c-4c5c-b684-d928b363fdc4" CreationDate="2009-07-15T11:53:37.507" UserDisplayName="Aidan Ryan" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;color&gt;&lt;theme&gt;" />
  <row Id="112" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="61" RevisionGUID="1a2e80fa-d79c-4c5c-b684-d928b363fdc4" CreationDate="2009-07-15T11:53:37.507" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="113" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="61" RevisionGUID="10f383cd-783a-4658-a461-cd86a27a1dcc" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:44.440" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5574/does-anyone-else-hate-the-superuser-mustard-color" Text="" />
  <row Id="114" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="72" RevisionGUID="aa45928f-7ce6-4e49-a35e-dc831885b407" CreationDate="2009-07-15T12:08:07.357" UserDisplayName="Marc Gravell" Text="You cast a downvote. That costs 1 rep (to discourage rampant revenge down-voting). Don't worry; you won't miss it." />
  <row Id="115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="73" RevisionGUID="5ac4f187-767e-484e-a1ed-445161c765b4" CreationDate="2009-07-15T12:08:09.963" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Did you downvote a question or answer? That subtracts 1 reputation from you." />
  <row Id="116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="71" RevisionGUID="f072fe29-c780-4cb2-8b1f-7d7e00083f36" CreationDate="2009-07-15T12:03:17.750" UserDisplayName="Abhinav" Text="Is the reputation on superuser working properly ? My reputation just decreased from 101 to 100, without any adverse activity." />
  <row Id="117" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="71" RevisionGUID="f072fe29-c780-4cb2-8b1f-7d7e00083f36" CreationDate="2009-07-15T12:03:17.750" UserDisplayName="Abhinav" Text="Why did I lose 1 reputation?" />
  <row Id="118" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="71" RevisionGUID="f072fe29-c780-4cb2-8b1f-7d7e00083f36" CreationDate="2009-07-15T12:03:17.750" UserDisplayName="Abhinav" Text="&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="119" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="71" RevisionGUID="9ddb76c3-f175-45c6-adc9-66d653032fb2" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:45.090" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5578/why-did-i-lose-1-reputation" Text="" />
  <row Id="120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="74" RevisionGUID="3442a702-6a88-4b0d-974e-9a9856c16938" CreationDate="2009-07-15T12:11:01.963" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="New-comers are limited to one question every 20 minutes. But periodically, they will be asked to perform a captcha test, even though their 20 minutes hasn't passed. If they succeed, they are alerted that they cannot post more than 1 question every 20 minutes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seems like a broken flow." />
  <row Id="121" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="74" RevisionGUID="3442a702-6a88-4b0d-974e-9a9856c16938" CreationDate="2009-07-15T12:11:01.963" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="re-CAPTCHA offers false-hope for newbs?" />
  <row Id="122" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="74" RevisionGUID="3442a702-6a88-4b0d-974e-9a9856c16938" CreationDate="2009-07-15T12:11:01.963" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="&lt;re-captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="123" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="74" RevisionGUID="3923f62e-36dd-47fc-833e-796acba2755d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:45.313" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5586/re-captcha-offers-false-hope-for-newbs" Text="" />
  <row Id="124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="76" RevisionGUID="f1d5ec68-fe9c-4af7-8288-b85a53c1420a" CreationDate="2009-07-15T14:08:26.020" UserDisplayName="Bill the Lizard" Text="Mark a question (or answer) as community wiki if you want to lower the reputation threshold allowing other people to edit your post." />
  <row Id="125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="77" RevisionGUID="721c8f99-47df-4b80-8de2-74c3394580f1" CreationDate="2009-07-15T14:08:51.833" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="I think some of those people might be riding the coat-tails of a question that *should* be wiki'd, but won't until they have enough rep to fully-participate. They're basically short-cutting everybody else to the front of the reputation line by asking questions that will be wildly popular, and accepting all reputation from it." />
  <row Id="126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="78" RevisionGUID="ec1eb270-876b-4363-ae8f-e456da63ee98" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:50:25.273" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="One of those is [mine][1] and all I can say from the experience is &quot;oops&quot; and &quot;fixed.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I posted, I just didn't think of &quot;community wiki&quot; any more than I think about tagging (I always forget). But at least I get a reminder to tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Isn't there a &quot;vote to wiki-fy&quot; function somewhere deep in the bowels of 10K-repdom? It seems as appropriate as an editing or a re-tagging function.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/1599/what-is-the-worst-depiction-of-computer-use-in-a-movie" />
  <row Id="127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="75" RevisionGUID="4205d86b-576a-44ab-928b-a474fcf35bb0" CreationDate="2009-07-15T13:48:55.263" UserDisplayName="lc" Text="I'm noticing *many* questions on the SuperUser beta which, in my opinion (based on how SO and SF work), should be community wiki questions, not being marked as such. The list goes on, but some examples are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/1599/what-is-the-worst-depiction-of-computer-use-in-a-movie&quot;&gt;What is the Worst Depiction of Computer Use in a Movie&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/1540/what-was-your-first-computer&quot;&gt;What was your First Computer?&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;* &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/1242/what-are-the-best-free-iphone-games&quot;&gt;What are the best free iphone games?&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know SU is young, but apparently the rules aren't exactly clear for what goes on SU and how community wiki works. So:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;0. What kinds of questions should go on SU and how does CW apply? Is there room for more of subjective, discussion-like questions, or should it mainly stick to the question(answerable problem)/answer(solution) methodology?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I know there's &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/128434/what-are-community-wiki-posts-on-stack-overflow&quot;&gt;this FAQ entry on SO&lt;/a&gt;, but is there a clear place that describes what should or shouldn't be community wiki, especially as it applies to SU?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Judging by &lt;a href=&quot;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5628/whats-with-the-should-be-a-wiki-comments&quot;&gt;this question on meta (What's with the 'should be a wiki' comments?)&lt;/a&gt;, this isn't really clear. Can/should we put this in a more prominent location so people understand how it works and (hopefully) use it correctly?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. As Welbog pointed out in a comment, perhaps this battle is not going to be won. Should we then revamp or remove the idea of CW as it applies to SU? If so, what do you suggest?" />
  <row Id="128" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="75" RevisionGUID="4205d86b-576a-44ab-928b-a474fcf35bb0" CreationDate="2009-07-15T13:48:55.263" UserDisplayName="lc" Text="&quot;Guidelines for when to make a question wiki on SU?&quot; or &quot;What/how should SU be used?&quot;" />
  <row Id="129" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="75" RevisionGUID="4205d86b-576a-44ab-928b-a474fcf35bb0" CreationDate="2009-07-15T13:48:55.263" UserDisplayName="lc" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="130" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="75" RevisionGUID="94cf41f8-c39b-4600-9cd4-a28f305d0f1f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:45.430" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5643/guidelines-for-when-to-make-a-question-wiki-on-su-or-what-how-should-su-be-us" Text="" />
  <row Id="131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="80" RevisionGUID="91287d48-16a0-48d4-85cc-244ed981a558" CreationDate="2009-07-15T14:39:58.007" UserDisplayName="Geoffrey Chetwood" Text="The down vote image looks the same, it is likely by design." />
  <row Id="132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="81" RevisionGUID="c731069a-17ea-4373-923f-9c6987fe4d26" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:35:41.640" UserDisplayName="Blixt" Text="What annoyed me was when you go to a question with a scroll to a specific answer that you have voted up/down, the background is blue-ish and the arrow looks really cropped.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![The arrow is cropped][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/8277/croppedd.jpg" />
  <row Id="133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="82" RevisionGUID="648c1305-205c-452f-95a7-8326fbc2a718" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:56:14.567" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Viewing it in Opera, the slanted edges of the triangles do look more jagged/stepped on SU than they do on SF or SO. Kind of like a Lego roof where the tiles/bricks step vertical a tad before returning on its 30º (roughly) journey once more" />
  <row Id="134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="79" RevisionGUID="365585db-97ac-49e9-9b94-cba02a839656" CreationDate="2009-07-15T14:36:20.593" UserDisplayName="Ant" Text="Does it look like this to anyone else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: I've edited the image to show the stackoverflow and superuser arrows next to each other. I'm not terribly concerned about the difference in size (although I think that could be the actual cause), but in the straightness of the diagonal edge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After upvoting a question or answer on SuperUser, the up arrow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![vote-arrow-up-in][up-arrow-good]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is kinda stretched, like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![screenshot][up-arrow-bad]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a small glitch, but it still annoys me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [up-arrow-good]: http://superuser.com/content/img/su/vote-arrow-up-on.png&#xD;&#xA;  [up-arrow-bad]: http://sine.cluenet.org/~grawity/trash/superuser-bug.png&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/573787350f.png" />
  <row Id="135" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="79" RevisionGUID="365585db-97ac-49e9-9b94-cba02a839656" CreationDate="2009-07-15T14:36:20.593" UserDisplayName="Ant" Text="Why do the voting arrow images on superuser.com have non-straight edges?" />
  <row Id="136" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="79" RevisionGUID="365585db-97ac-49e9-9b94-cba02a839656" CreationDate="2009-07-15T14:36:20.593" UserDisplayName="Ant" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="137" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="79" RevisionGUID="9d4ac88d-a0df-4e53-aba7-50f635fff32d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:31:46.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5665/why-do-the-voting-arrow-images-on-superuser-com-have-non-straight-edges" Text="" />
  <row Id="138" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="39" RevisionGUID="188eb804-f1c3-4f42-98fd-b5d4c8581bc4" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:34:58.680" UserId="3" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;faq&gt;&lt;openid&gt;" />
  <row Id="139" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="42" RevisionGUID="f7f551f0-3dfd-4e25-9b4e-b33e1f6d125b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:35:31.470" UserId="3" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;jon-skeet&gt;" />
  <row Id="140" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="50" RevisionGUID="44d6319a-31ac-4753-a4d0-e661894c2a99" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:36:02.420" UserId="3" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;beta&gt;" />
  <row Id="141" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="71" RevisionGUID="b6060320-947a-4dad-8d73-e0b03bd7ed4c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:36:35.990" UserId="3" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="142" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="79" RevisionGUID="1c866ee5-b90a-47df-9c80-d56cbe944e64" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:38:34.723" UserId="3" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="143" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="75" RevisionGUID="b79b0d54-a1dd-4523-bd46-b90689389f82" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:39:05.627" UserId="3" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;faq&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="84" RevisionGUID="bb744b95-c8bf-468f-950a-3b47e182443c" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:57:52.260" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="I don't like the idea of SuperUser being your personal Amazon or eBay. The questions asking &quot;where I can get the cheapest X&quot; are already annoying as it is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: I should probably revise this some now that I am actually a moderator of the website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So far there have been lots and lots of questions looking for product recommendations when it comes to specific issues (&quot;I need a free/cheap video editing software&quot;). These questions I have no real problem with (as long as they are not duplicates of something already posted). This will allow for people to post their recommendations and there can actually be a correct answer (what the OP decides to end up going with). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find these type of questions are much better than &quot;Where can I find the cheapest router&quot; or &quot;I need to find a place where I can buy [X] for less than $50&quot;. There are plenty of websites out there already which allow you to do specific product searches and compare prices among other websites, we don't need SuperUser to devolve into that. I do think that SuperUser's community can be a helpful source of product recommendations, however." />
  <row Id="145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="85" RevisionGUID="4e00ef29-4e35-4d10-a788-18c643dd31a6" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:59:29.353" UserDisplayName="Hilarious Comedy Pesto" Text="Ugh, let's not become Craigslist without the &quot;adult services&quot; section.  I can't imagine anything worse." />
  <row Id="146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="86" RevisionGUID="18f5b1b1-90f6-4257-aeb3-3d2b26d80421" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:00:13.250" UserDisplayName="ChrisF" Text="If someone's asked for the cheapest X then I can't see there being a serious problem if a vendor of X comes along and says get it here. There could be issues around the wording etc, but it would have to be on a case-by-case basis.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem might be that the question's been posted in the first place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where there would be a problem is if the vendor posted the advert (for want of a better word) as a question." />
  <row Id="147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="88" RevisionGUID="9b187417-0a18-47cc-8024-d72ac1412d56" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:27:02.267" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="All I saw today was somebody asking where they can buy hardware for cheap...I suggested newegg, and that was it :)" />
  <row Id="148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="89" RevisionGUID="915d2020-b08c-4700-b138-4c7f6938d105" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:57:39.980" UserDisplayName="Brad Gilbert" Text="[ref]: http://superuser.com/questions/327/are-my-5-25-floppies-dead&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There was a [question][ref] where someone was asking if he could still get data off of some old 5 1/4 disks. All I did was append to my answer that I had some spare parts, and it got down-voted immediately. I have since removed that from my answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wasn't really trying to sell him, or anybody, anything. I was just trying to be helpful." />
  <row Id="149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="87" RevisionGUID="c3602930-95b2-4d64-9514-fabc378e4785" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:14:48.963" UserDisplayName="Rowland Shaw" Text="Don't forget you can flag as Spam. The worse case is &quot;How do I solve X?&quot; with an answer &quot;Use product Y&quot; (where Y is a referral link, and doesn't actually solve the problem).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be neat if the system could automagically either de-referrer them (or potentially better for the site as a whole) automagically substitute for a StackOverflow referral tag. For things like books,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also like Wikipedia's approach if sending you to a landing page, with referral links for all the major online bookstores (based on ISBN)" />
  <row Id="150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="83" RevisionGUID="df105601-7552-459d-aa1e-332bfdc69a12" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:55:10.003" UserDisplayName="Jon Erickson" Text="I can see some questions like 'where can i get the cheapest X' and other members might have X and want to sell.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have mixed feelings as to whether or not that should be allowed, but it would be interesting to see some opinions on it." />
  <row Id="151" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="83" RevisionGUID="df105601-7552-459d-aa1e-332bfdc69a12" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:55:10.003" UserDisplayName="Jon Erickson" Text="How does the community feel about people trying to SELL things on SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="152" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="83" RevisionGUID="df105601-7552-459d-aa1e-332bfdc69a12" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:55:10.003" UserDisplayName="Jon Erickson" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="153" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="83" RevisionGUID="34bd7f28-f85a-4df8-bf6d-d7a9b4e8b658" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:16.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5701/how-does-the-community-feel-about-people-trying-to-sell-things-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="91" RevisionGUID="066b9e37-ba78-494c-8f18-471bbee157e0" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:05:36.677" UserDisplayName="Geoffrey Chetwood" Text="It is not abuse, and is actually desirable.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We like faster answers on the sites and as long as the answer was on topic and had at least something of content in it, there is nothing wrong with fleshing it out later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is actually one of the reasons why there is a time delay on when the revision history picks up on edits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This answer is actually an example of this by the way." />
  <row Id="155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="92" RevisionGUID="226bdd69-f061-4df6-9edd-aaa04c830d1d" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:06:23.463" UserDisplayName="ChrisF" Text="This does happen on SO, so I can only assume it does on SF as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think it can ever be stopped, unless a ban is put on editing posts within a certain time period. However, that would (I feel) cause more problems than it solves as an incorrect post could attract multiple down-votes in that period.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might be noticing it now because SU is so new. It could settle down in a few days." />
  <row Id="156" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="93" RevisionGUID="a1543611-a69e-4dfe-a274-321a749ea882" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:07:46.620" UserDisplayName="Timothy Carter" Text="I think it is an abuse of the system to post something that is purely a placeholder and has no content or attempt at an answer whatsoever. However, if its partial answer, or an answer without supporting code/links I think that is acceptable. It potentially still helps the OP faster, and has meaningful content. While still allowing the answerer to update the content to a more complete version." />
  <row Id="157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="90" RevisionGUID="7256b092-ccfe-4fff-b8b5-2b36d6da2d35" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:02:12.607" UserDisplayName="David Ma" Text="I never noticed this practice on *stackoverflow* or *serverfault*, but I noticed on *superuser* that some users will answer a question if a placeholder that either barely or does not answer the question it was in response to. Several minutes later, the user will then edit their post to answer the question and incorporate other answers. This seems like a blatant abuse of the system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that [The Fastest Guns in the West][1] is considered solved, but doesn't this kind of abuse seem like a response to at least the perception that early posts are accepted and up voted more often?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short, is it an abuse of the system to post placeholder answers to a question and if so what can be done about it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/73/is-the-fastest-gun-in-the-west-solved" />
  <row Id="158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="90" RevisionGUID="7256b092-ccfe-4fff-b8b5-2b36d6da2d35" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:02:12.607" UserDisplayName="David Ma" Text="Is editing being abused?" />
  <row Id="159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="90" RevisionGUID="7256b092-ccfe-4fff-b8b5-2b36d6da2d35" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:02:12.607" UserDisplayName="David Ma" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;editing&gt;&lt;abuse&gt;&lt;gaming-the-system&gt;" />
  <row Id="160" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="90" RevisionGUID="43c70279-e8ca-46a7-8704-a12083792f39" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:17.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5713/is-editing-being-abused" Text="" />
  <row Id="161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="95" RevisionGUID="d7be0ce5-04e3-4213-bd81-edd74897c725" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:08:20.557" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="Reputation, I believe. I had that limit this morning (1 question per 20 minutes) and it went away as my reputation increased." />
  <row Id="162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="96" RevisionGUID="430cc006-4f96-4c50-a97a-8fc815e417a8" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:08:25.487" UserDisplayName="spaetzel" Text="The limit goes away once you hit [100 reputation](http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/02/new-question-answer-rate-limits/)" />
  <row Id="163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="97" RevisionGUID="7a44c702-6c59-41ed-af86-bbd0c1490a8a" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:08:26.627" UserDisplayName="Cristián Romo" Text="It is reputation based.  See [&quot;What is reputation?&quot; in the faq][1].  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Amass enough reputation points and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User will allow you to go beyond&#xD;&#xA;&gt; simply asking and answering questions:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    15	 Vote up  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    15	 Flag offensive  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    50	 Leave comments  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   100	 Vote down (costs 1 rep), create new tags  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   200	 Reduced advertising  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   250	 Vote to close or open your questions  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   500	 Retag questions  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;   750	 Edit community wiki posts  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  2000	 Edit other people's posts  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  3000	 Vote to close any questions  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; 10000	 Delete closed questions, access to moderation tools &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; At the high end of this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reputation spectrum there is little&#xD;&#xA;&gt; difference between users with high&#xD;&#xA;&gt; reputation and moderators. That is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; very much intentional. We don't run&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User. The community does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/faq" />
  <row Id="164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="98" RevisionGUID="dc47cc44-853c-42ef-b6c2-8a3379c16b89" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:11:51.050" Text="None of these answers are really correct. There are special limitations for Rep 1 users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/4564/document-rep-limit-for-new-users&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; New user (less than 15 rep) restrictions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - new users may not post images&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - new users may only post one URL&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; New user (less than 100 rep) restrictions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - new users may only post one question every 20 minutes&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - new users may only post one answer every 2 minutes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To lift these restrictions, gain more rep!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="99" RevisionGUID="d2835e85-c5d7-4770-bb17-11ed769f6d47" CreationDate="2010-05-07T00:01:24.893" UserDisplayName="Evan Carroll" Text="I'm still a &quot;new user&quot; and I've been using this site for seven months. Essentially, you're a new user until a bunch of people get together and decided to vote you up. I know... It really has nothing to do with _new_, but [like most bugs no one seems to care to fix it.](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/48782/another-bundle-of-bug-reports-for-so)" />
  <row Id="166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="94" RevisionGUID="809e4a1a-8a93-4bc6-a72b-f85d2aa06cd4" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:07:08.970" UserDisplayName="kpoehls" Text="How long does it take to NOT be considered a 'New User'. Is it reputation, day/hour based?" />
  <row Id="167" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="94" RevisionGUID="809e4a1a-8a93-4bc6-a72b-f85d2aa06cd4" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:07:08.970" UserDisplayName="kpoehls" Text="New User limitations" />
  <row Id="168" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="94" RevisionGUID="809e4a1a-8a93-4bc6-a72b-f85d2aa06cd4" CreationDate="2009-07-15T15:07:08.970" UserDisplayName="kpoehls" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;new-users&gt;" />
  <row Id="169" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="94" RevisionGUID="0f7741b2-4600-4f2b-a0ae-5f06200537c7" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:18.753" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5724/new-user-limitations" Text="" />
  <row Id="170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="101" RevisionGUID="c14ccbe8-64ee-478c-ae2e-a5194c3b6a5e" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:29:14.353" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="This is correct. Once I associated, I had a rep of 101 on SuperUser and I have now capped out at 301.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason for this is because the association does not count as 'earned' rep, and therefore doesn't affect the count of how much rep you've earned so far that day." />
  <row Id="171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="100" RevisionGUID="a99104c4-762f-47b8-ad19-0fa422818f55" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:27:41.297" UserDisplayName="nik" Text="I am guessing that the daily reputation cap does not count points granted for associating user identity across the stackoverflow sites. Can someone correct/confirm this?" />
  <row Id="172" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="100" RevisionGUID="a99104c4-762f-47b8-ad19-0fa422818f55" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:27:41.297" UserDisplayName="nik" Text="Daily reputation cap on Superuser does not count the association points?" />
  <row Id="173" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="100" RevisionGUID="a99104c4-762f-47b8-ad19-0fa422818f55" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:27:41.297" UserDisplayName="nik" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;&lt;association&gt;" />
  <row Id="174" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="100" RevisionGUID="98a27c1b-6c19-40d0-ac81-488b7953f07b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:19.267" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5744/daily-reputation-cap-on-superuser-does-not-count-the-association-points" Text="" />
  <row Id="175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="103" RevisionGUID="26e22d36-b5ad-4096-b628-f142fba508de" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:16:37.217" UserDisplayName="Geoffrey Chetwood" Text="I wish we could just get rid of the pink. Next thing you know there will be a pony overlay as a background image.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel like @wood was hungry when he designed SuperUser and was chewing on a box of Good &amp; Plenty:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.zoehartleycarter.com/morningtoast/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/good_and_plenty_box.jpg" />
  <row Id="176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="102" RevisionGUID="564a7970-171f-4719-aaee-38d43a1e2015" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:46:22.483" UserDisplayName="lc" Text="When you flag a post as &quot;requires moderator attention&quot;, you get a box to enter a reason. On SuperUser, this box is pink, unlike the red on the other sites. As you type, the number of characters remaining counts down. The first warning level (orange shades, 59-30 characters remaining) is ugly and *somewhat* readable. After this, the red warning is *just plain unreadable*:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://modos.org/sumodflag.png" />
  <row Id="177" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="102" RevisionGUID="564a7970-171f-4719-aaee-38d43a1e2015" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:46:22.483" UserDisplayName="lc" Text="Red remaining-character counter in SU flag reason unreadable/ugly" />
  <row Id="178" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="102" RevisionGUID="564a7970-171f-4719-aaee-38d43a1e2015" CreationDate="2009-07-15T16:46:22.483" UserDisplayName="lc" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;user-interface&gt;&lt;color&gt;" />
  <row Id="179" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="102" RevisionGUID="60683bb9-6687-4901-880f-657461272fbb" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:19.707" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5756/red-remaining-character-counter-in-su-flag-reason-unreadable-ugly" Text="" />
  <row Id="180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="105" RevisionGUID="285c4052-d6f4-4e20-83f8-190184f8844b" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:27:12.317" UserDisplayName="Geoffrey Chetwood" Text="You seem to be implying that Jeff Atwood listens to any of Joel's 'rules'. Looking at any manner of evidence, this seems to be a vastly flawed opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, why would anyone care about what SVN revision number any of the sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Proposed fix: Remove SVN revision number from page." />
  <row Id="181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="106" RevisionGUID="509a4cbd-4794-4c13-b521-5ea38e425c31" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:30:08.323" UserDisplayName="Hilarious Comedy Pesto" Text="It took an extra four revisions to find just the right shade of blue.  For the record, the revisions were:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    3967: Bright Blue&#xD;&#xA;    3968: Electric Blue&#xD;&#xA;    3969: Laser Blue&#xD;&#xA;    3970: Eye-Melting Blue" />
  <row Id="182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="107" RevisionGUID="fc4ed93a-4a38-4bf6-a05f-b0a010d34da4" CreationDate="2009-07-16T08:14:34.940" Text="sometimes we do site specific builds. There is a one click build, just not one click &quot;every site must be the same version&quot; build." />
  <row Id="183" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="104" RevisionGUID="e56bcee1-5384-4739-b482-4d79054be120" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:21:01.690" UserDisplayName="DrJokepu" Text="Apparently, the SVN revision is different on SU than on SO/SF/meta. At the moment it's 3970 on the former and 3966 on the rest. This must mean that you guys don't really have an automated deployment process that builds the source in one click and deploys it automatically to all sites. The kind of one click deployment one Joel talks about all the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is it just that you have only deployed SU manually because it is beta?" />
  <row Id="184" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="104" RevisionGUID="e56bcee1-5384-4739-b482-4d79054be120" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:21:01.690" UserDisplayName="DrJokepu" Text="Why is there a different SVN revision listed on SU and SO/SF/meta?" />
  <row Id="185" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="104" RevisionGUID="e56bcee1-5384-4739-b482-4d79054be120" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:21:01.690" UserDisplayName="DrJokepu" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="186" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="104" RevisionGUID="84c2bb32-2038-480b-86ba-aaf3ced6809d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:20.997" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5765/why-is-there-a-different-svn-revision-listed-on-su-and-so-sf-meta" Text="" />
  <row Id="187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="109" RevisionGUID="10c52540-0277-457c-b41f-cb7513e25edc" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:25:25.867" UserDisplayName="Joel Coehoorn" Text="I wouldn't worry yet. It's the first day!  Give it a couple weeks and I bet things shake out some." />
  <row Id="188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="110" RevisionGUID="9ed8caf4-420a-47d3-af47-6f5ce93e60b9" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:25:58.603" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="I asked the question about firefox addons - I think it's totally appropriate for a site about super-users. These are users who modify the way their machines work, and firefox addons do exactly that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do agree that many other questions (&quot;[What game are you playing online now?][1]&quot;) should be ditched though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/2902/which-online-game-you-are-playing-in-your-free-time" />
  <row Id="189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="111" RevisionGUID="dff9f45b-4e8d-4ae1-afdf-e92166b77d44" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:31:37.097" UserDisplayName="Hilarious Comedy Pesto" Text="I thought the point of SuperUser was always to serve as a trash  heap for all the stuff that didn't belong on SO and SF." />
  <row Id="190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="112" RevisionGUID="d4791353-60bd-4e4f-98ff-9accd8975d66" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:35:11.990" UserDisplayName="Geoffrey Chetwood" Text="What else did you expect from the free-for-all site? Just leave it to the masses and let them burn themselves out on it. As long as it keeps the noise from the other sites I say it is a success." />
  <row Id="191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="113" RevisionGUID="2c09ad59-346e-472f-a3be-c30e75f0f658" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:49:43.930" Text="&gt; The community wiki-type questions can be fun, but at this very early stage in the development of superuser.com it seems like if this trend continues it could create a culture that discourages the participation of people looking for solutions to real problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We need to come up with a set of guidelines for what questions work on SU, but it is intentionally a bit open ended (**&quot;computer related&quot;** is the only current guideline..) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, if you think these questions are bad, then what guidelines should exist in the faq, and what &quot;close reasons&quot;, to prevent them from dominating the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Update:  &#xD;&#xA;I made it so [the force community wiki threshold is 10 answers on Super User](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6814/reduce-community-wiki-force-threshold-to-15-answers-on-superuser)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="114" RevisionGUID="bac7afdd-daa6-47f1-8a7e-97d3bc0ed0e0" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:50:27.600" UserDisplayName="gnovice" Text="Unfortunately, you'll probably see certain types of questions continuously popping up in various mutated forms, like the &quot;Must have blankety-blank&quot; questions. It's *really* easy for a user to just cut and paste the basic form/concept of a popular question, replacing the blankety-blanks. Another type of question this has happened with on SO was the &quot;Hidden features of blankety-blank&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's low-hanging fruit, someone desperate for more Rep is gonna snatch it up." />
  <row Id="193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="115" RevisionGUID="9fe55056-8f41-40a7-b6c6-e3f0fd288a67" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:58:30.237" UserDisplayName="bobobobo" Text="Implement something that tends to bury items tagged &quot;subjective&quot;, without having to close or remove them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Users should be able to put &quot;subjective&quot; in their ignored tags and moderators can be sure to tag all subjective questions as such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another idea is to bin the subjective questions into another sort of sub-area of the front page. This would mean changing the layout, so the subjective questions still have a place on the site, but they don't crowd out the &quot;real&quot; questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="116" RevisionGUID="25f75e14-e332-4885-a1f3-c45e5993f2da" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:19:22.887" UserDisplayName="chaos" Text="For getting actual questions answered, it doesn't matter what bubbles to the top of the front page, anyway.  We fastest-gun types know to watch `Questions -&gt; Newest`.  Hardly going to score yourself a couple dozen Enlightened badges wading through well-established questions, am I right?" />
  <row Id="195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="117" RevisionGUID="44e84450-bd29-4651-ab10-2b08ccc24b65" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:53:41.490" UserDisplayName="Arnold Spence" Text="There are far more questions than can fit on the front page even if you eliminate what you consider 'shoot-the-breeze' questions. I can't imagine any consensus or rule fixing this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We just have to hope that people with answers regularly scan the 'unanswered' lists filtering by tags they are interested in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe we can have a 'blink' tag and insist that only important questions use it :)" />
  <row Id="196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="118" RevisionGUID="5928fd55-27cd-43ae-895a-d60fc1987736" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:43:47.600" UserDisplayName="Brad Gilbert" Text="I was just going through some of the early posts on Stack Overflow, they had very few votes on them, regardless of content. I think you just have to wait for things to settle down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the same thing that happened on all of the other sites, when they went open-Beta." />
  <row Id="197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="121" RevisionGUID="276220f5-688c-429b-9279-d42adf3ba993" CreationDate="2009-07-16T23:53:28.547" UserDisplayName="Antony" Text="Perhaps there could be a way to filter CW questions off the home page? Like ignored tags?" />
  <row Id="198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="122" RevisionGUID="8b2d1d9c-82f4-48be-9267-5acdfcd63ccb" CreationDate="2009-07-17T00:17:23.913" UserDisplayName="John Fouhy" Text="What if 'subjective' and community-wiki questions are hidden from the front-page by default?  That would present new visitors with a relatively clean first look at the site, but people who want to see all the junk could turn it on." />
  <row Id="199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="119" RevisionGUID="75821d5d-0dcc-4026-94ce-e541d36bb2f1" CreationDate="2009-07-16T22:28:48.407" UserDisplayName="Graham Lee" Text="Of course, if the subjective questions are the hottest questions, it could just demonstrate that people are most interested in the subjective questions..." />
  <row Id="200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="120" RevisionGUID="811b8c14-2024-4c0d-ac47-02a504bbef27" CreationDate="2009-07-16T23:36:09.683" UserDisplayName="RBerteig" Text="Perhaps the there should be checkbox labeled something like &quot;subjective topic or poll&quot; placed like the existing community wiki checkbox. Checking it would auto-tag with `subjective` *and* force CW status.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both checkboxes should be moved closer to the Post Your Answer button and made much more visible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suspect this would work across the family, not just on superuser.com, and would relieve the strident cries for polls to be changed to CW by encouraging them to be that way in the first place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be fine with this checkbox being a one-shot deal that caused its effect when the question was posted. When editing a question, only the CW box could be visible, and conversion from a normal question to a poll would be exactly as it is now.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="123" RevisionGUID="4a798b7d-df42-448e-bee1-99c518d6eff9" CreationDate="2009-07-18T15:19:53.293" UserDisplayName="Nosredna" Text="I think it's fine to have the subjective questions. How do you get rid of them without making subjective.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just help the other questions out more. Move non-subjective questions that haven't seen many answers back to the top of the list every so often.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That guy who wants to hook up MIDI to CentOS? Automatically pop his question back to the top every 13 hours (to gradually shift the question into other time zones) for a week." />
  <row Id="202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="108" RevisionGUID="11792aa7-6d12-4f6c-8c3a-417b40fef64d" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:22:45.937" UserDisplayName="phenry" Text="The top listed questions on the front page of superuser.com at the moment:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Side Effects of Reformatting Hard Drive&#xD;&#xA; - Must have iPhone applications&#xD;&#xA; - “Must-Have” Firefox Addons?&#xD;&#xA; - What is Wolfram Alpha good for?&#xD;&#xA; - How to completely turn off UAC in Windows 7?&#xD;&#xA; - Can I use any USB hub with an XBOX360 and Rockband controllers?&#xD;&#xA; - Recommendations for a Pre-Built Computer&#xD;&#xA; - Simple video cropping app&#xD;&#xA; - What’s your favourite piece of (Linux) software nobody’s heard about?&#xD;&#xA; - Google Contacts and Mac OS X Address Book&#xD;&#xA; - Is it better to leave your computer on all the time?&#xD;&#xA; - Launch synergy client on boot in Mac OS X&#xD;&#xA; - “Must-Have” Linux Software&#xD;&#xA; - “Must Have” Mac OS X Software&#xD;&#xA; - Default Windows 7 Install: What to change to make it faster?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of these, I would say that maybe a third are the type of questions for which these sites were originally intended: I have a specific problem, I post a question about it, I get an answer that hopefully fixes my problem. The rest are basically for shooting the breeze. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One particularly unfortunate side effect of this phenomenon is that the shoot-the-breeze questions keep getting recycled to the top of the front page, because they attract so many answers (&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/587/must-have-firefox-addons&quot;&gt;95 answers here&lt;/a&gt; for a question that was asked this morning, for example). Meanwhile, questions looking for answers to problems disappear beneath the waves within minutes before attracting a single answer, or even very many views. Witness the plight of the poor fellow looking for a way to &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/2879/connecting-a-midi-controller-to-centos5&quot;&gt;connect a MIDI controller to CentOS5&lt;/a&gt; (admittedly a rather esoteric question): 22 minutes after being born, the question scrolled off the front page with a grand total of 0 votes, 0 answers, and 2 views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The community wiki-type questions can be fun, but at this very early stage in the development of superuser.com it seems like if this trend continues it could create a culture that discourages the participation of people looking for solutions to real problems." />
  <row Id="203" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="108" RevisionGUID="11792aa7-6d12-4f6c-8c3a-417b40fef64d" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:22:45.937" UserDisplayName="phenry" Text="Super User attracting too many open-ended/subjective questions?" />
  <row Id="204" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="108" RevisionGUID="11792aa7-6d12-4f6c-8c3a-417b40fef64d" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:22:45.937" UserDisplayName="phenry" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="205" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="108" RevisionGUID="c2321a21-9645-4b24-9933-05c1770030d1" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:21.673" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5766/super-user-attracting-too-many-open-ended-subjective-questions" Text="" />
  <row Id="206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="125" RevisionGUID="2ca83a41-2063-4c75-98c4-b2bf0fcbb4d2" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:57:48.857" UserDisplayName="Geoffrey Chetwood" Text="I see it is a free-for-all site that should be left to the masses so they can burn themselves out on it. As long as it keeps the noise from the other sites I say it is a success.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is computer related, let them talk about it. Just stay away from it if you don't want to be offended by blinding stupidity and mind numbingly useless content." />
  <row Id="207" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="125" RevisionGUID="2ca83a41-2063-4c75-98c4-b2bf0fcbb4d2" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:57:48.857" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="126" RevisionGUID="d3aeea71-4b2d-4a2e-b9ba-fbb5cdc6d1d7" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:01:10.203" UserDisplayName="Chester" Text="The only difficulty here is that SU has been labeled as being the nearly anything goes site where if it is about computers/technology its probably goes...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would say that the questions must be about technology or computers at a minimum.  If the question is not about technology/computers it should be closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other reasons questions should be closed: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - spam&#xD;&#xA; - offensive&#xD;&#xA; - too localized&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Overall, I do not want SU to be a trash site or dumping ground for non SO and SF questions.  Nobody will win in that scenario.  We should keep the questions as Q&amp;A as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that we may need a vote for wiki option that questions that are subjective can have users vote and automagically make them CW.  This should help with some of the rep stuff that folks are going to do at the beginning.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To keep the site to the Q&amp;A format, I also think that we need to get some moderator attention on the site as soon as possible.  I would definitely say anyone with mod access to META, SO, or SF would be a great fit for starting the mod process out on SU.  I started a thread on moderator nomination [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5787/superuser-com-moderator-nomination" />
  <row Id="209" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="126" RevisionGUID="d3aeea71-4b2d-4a2e-b9ba-fbb5cdc6d1d7" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:01:10.203" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="210" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="127" RevisionGUID="5ed9d43b-9b3e-42e1-bc17-b4151421f633" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:02:03.187" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="My personal opinion is that SuperUser should retain much of the true Q&amp;A that we got from StackOverflow and ServerFault. This means that we should be striving for questions that actually have answers. Questions about how to perform Task X or how to correct Problem Y. I do not believe that SuperUser should be a breeding ground of favorite product lists, unless those lists of products are an answer to a problem or task. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The more &quot;What is the best...&quot; and &quot;What are some must-haves&quot; questions that get posted, the more and more polluted that SuperUser is going to become. The same can be said for all of the whimsical and navel-gazing Community Wiki posts that have already been made (&quot;What was your first computer&quot;). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea of these websites it to give answers to questions, and I think SuperUser should more clearly reflect that. The more it turns into a full-blown anything-goes discussion site, the less and less it is going to stand out from other tech sites, and the fewer people who are going to come actually looking for answers to their tech questions." />
  <row Id="211" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="127" RevisionGUID="5ed9d43b-9b3e-42e1-bc17-b4151421f633" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:02:03.187" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="128" RevisionGUID="d30c3f8c-e6de-44aa-a90e-aaa1c2f18653" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:02:19.067" UserDisplayName="bobobobo" Text="The only questions that should be removed are questions that are &quot;not computer related&quot;." />
  <row Id="213" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="128" RevisionGUID="d30c3f8c-e6de-44aa-a90e-aaa1c2f18653" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:02:19.067" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="129" RevisionGUID="a36193e1-38b5-4135-88e0-402bd4b8496b" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:15:34.650" UserDisplayName="phenry" Text="One thing I would do would be to give people with sufficient rep the ability to wiki-ize questions with extreme prejudice, or at least vote to make them community wiki (maybe they already have that ability, I don't know), and encourage them to use it aggressively against obviously subjective or open-ended questions when the original asker doesn't. This would at least discourage rep farming, and hopefully would also condition people toward asking more useful questions." />
  <row Id="215" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="129" RevisionGUID="a36193e1-38b5-4135-88e0-402bd4b8496b" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:15:34.650" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="130" RevisionGUID="3ea8981c-db39-40b8-b27e-6ca041222038" CreationDate="2009-07-15T19:43:15.467" UserDisplayName="chaos" Text="Honestly, I think SU should be left in its Wild West state until it calms down on its own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For one thing, a dirty little secret of sites like these is that the proliferation of original, diverse, fundamentally useless and nonsensical user-generated content helps the site build credibility with Google; all those goofy-ass &quot;must-have&quot; questions are little pagerank factories.  That will help get the site out there and build its audience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once the initial expansionary phase has gone on for a while, then I'd say start calming things down and straightening them out.  But don't come in with the SWAT team right away.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would even go so far as to say that serverfault's relative lack of success compared to stackoverflow has a contributing factor in the fact that stackoverflow started out as a Wild West and evolved its social conventions, where serverfault had The Law in place from day one." />
  <row Id="217" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="130" RevisionGUID="3ea8981c-db39-40b8-b27e-6ca041222038" CreationDate="2009-07-15T19:43:15.467" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="218" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="131" RevisionGUID="1182406f-e885-491a-a11c-793bace0c28d" CreationDate="2009-07-15T19:49:31.070" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="Jeff,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Explicitly branding Superuser.com as a more **free-form, relaxed version** of the other sites might just open that crack to a much larger problem. I hear it referred to as a &quot;free-for-all&quot; and a &quot;dumping ground.&quot; I'm sure that's not what you envisioned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you (we) hold Superuser to the same focus and **same high standards** as the other sites, most of these problems would go away. Even if Superuser is held to the same high standard as the other sites, it would still have the lighter, more relaxed atmosphere you imagine, just from the broader appeal of the the site and the subject matter. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More specifically, I see the **abundance of Wiki-style posts** as a problem. I thought it would be fun having more subjective, intriguing conversations on Superuser. I started one myself. But I see it just **doesn't work** in the bigger picture. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the &quot;community standard&quot; should be that **Wikis are rare**. Wikis are reserved for that rare case when a question does not have a specific answer but the solution would be part of a &quot;group think.&quot; Even then, Wiki questions should be posed as a specific question looking for a **real solution**. Anything else should be closed as too general or too subjective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;StackOverflow is a winning formula that should be reapplied to Superuser, **almost verbatim**. That's my take on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="219" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="131" RevisionGUID="1182406f-e885-491a-a11c-793bace0c28d" CreationDate="2009-07-15T19:49:31.070" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="132" RevisionGUID="a0331e0f-b507-4b2e-bb61-d3d95d26cfa8" CreationDate="2009-07-16T01:50:17.687" UserDisplayName="Thor K.H" Text="I agree with many of the answers provided, mostly with TheTXI.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, what I see right now is users gaming the system, and it's a bit worrying. The typical listing questions/community wikis are insanely popular (because you merely say what you already use, not necessarily why you use it) and it doesn't take a lot of effort to answer, creating these horrible lists of answers that are short, yet so many of them that it doesn't matter. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is really a shame, as I think many users believe this is all fair and square due to SU being labeled as the &quot;anything computer related goes&quot;, without considering the part where you ask a question and get hopefully one good answer that satisfied you. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's not the case with the majority of questions, and it's a darn shame, as SU can do a whole lot better than this, especially the users, instead of gaming this and getting reps at speeds comparable to this.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    while ( $rep &lt; 500 ) {&#xD;&#xA;        $rep++;&#xD;&#xA;    }" />
  <row Id="221" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="132" RevisionGUID="a0331e0f-b507-4b2e-bb61-d3d95d26cfa8" CreationDate="2009-07-16T01:50:17.687" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="133" RevisionGUID="c6ee7c05-f2b1-497b-b31f-229628cfbe7f" CreationDate="2009-07-16T22:22:11.603" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="You should probably take a look at &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5778/help-define-superuser-com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The short answer is: We are still working on developing a more concrete guideline about what is accepted, what is not, what should be wiki, etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can say in general terms&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Anything that looks like a list or &quot;must have&quot; or &quot;what do you have&quot; will generally get turned to CW if it is not closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Questions that are specifically about certain games are likely to get closed as Not Computer Related.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Questions concerning console gaming are almost sure to get closed as Not Computer Related." />
  <row Id="223" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="134" RevisionGUID="8caf8c0d-fd62-490e-88ef-c2e5c3fd1e80" CreationDate="2009-07-16T22:23:16.473" UserDisplayName="Paolo Bergantino" Text="The PS3 **is** a computer. I don't see why PS3 questions are off-limit for SuperUser." />
  <row Id="224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="135" RevisionGUID="763e3f17-0c8f-4bf7-a1f2-3eedb4b7cc66" CreationDate="2009-07-16T22:27:19.200" UserDisplayName="Joel Coehoorn" Text="I'm wondering how we'll deal with the inevitable shopping questions: &quot;I'm looking for a new graphics card. What should I get?&quot;  These answers are different for every user and even for a single user would likely change on a monthly or even daily basis." />
  <row Id="225" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="135" RevisionGUID="763e3f17-0c8f-4bf7-a1f2-3eedb4b7cc66" CreationDate="2009-07-16T22:27:19.200" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="136" RevisionGUID="58f6a6e5-dba7-4720-9c0e-d1a06bfb5b40" CreationDate="2009-07-17T17:46:58.337" UserDisplayName="David Zaslavsky" Text="My impression when I first heard about it was that SuperUser would be for (1) PC hardware questions and (2) questions about single-user/client software (basically things you wouldn't find on a server), including operating systems. So I would put forth the suggestion that SuperUser questions should be generally limited to those two categories. (I'm not 100% sure I believe in it, but I'm putting it forth.) Looking at it now, it seems like most of the questions do fall rather cleanly into one or the other." />
  <row Id="227" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="136" RevisionGUID="58f6a6e5-dba7-4720-9c0e-d1a06bfb5b40" CreationDate="2009-07-17T17:46:58.337" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="137" RevisionGUID="952db507-89ab-43b2-9728-55a39ebbae0b" CreationDate="2009-07-18T16:14:27.843" UserDisplayName="jerryjvl" Text="Having written the original *&quot;Must-Have Games&quot;* question I wasn't sure I should comment due to bias, however I guess that doesn't disqualify me from an opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let me start by saying that I really have no problem if games-related questions are off-limits and will be closed, but if that is the outcome can we at least have a '*No Games Questions*' reason or some such, since '*Not Computer Related*' just reads silly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having said that, I specifically asked my question because I have not been gaming for some time, and I do not want to waste my new-found time on games that do not have something special about them. As such I specifically tried to word my question to receive more thoughtful responses than just whatever game people were currently playing. Based on the high-scoring answers that I actually recognise from either having played them or read about them, I have no doubt that people weren't just throwing out random games (or at the least that those that floated to the top are actually going to be worth my time).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a final thought I think that writing down rules in absolute terms is a mistake; some judgement needs to be involved, because otherwise worthwhile/fun things will be disallowed too. Take as an example the huge &quot;Jon Skeet Facts?&quot; thread on Stack Overflow which is still an open CW (and rightfully so in my opinion), but strictly speaking that is not even computer related in the sense that people are advocating here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Unrelated note:** (unrelated to *my* main point at least)   &#xD;&#xA;Is there any way to make the CW tickbox a bit more prominent? So far every question I have asked that was made into CW after-the-fact it was actually my intent right from the start for it to be CW. Call it a case of the &quot;attachment-less-email&quot; syndrome, but by the time I have written my question and attached tags, I often forget to check the tickbox before clicking post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Addendum:**  &#xD;&#xA;To illustrate my point, this [Playstation Network][1] question (closed by Jeff, so not sure how well that'll do to support my case :P) is, although terribly worded, in essence a perfectly valid question from a guy that needs tips for troubleshooting a bad connection... the fact that he identifies the most likely culprit himself (wireless) does not mean it couldn't be something else, and he clearly does not know how to establish this with certainty himself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand this [iPhone][2] question (coincidentally also closed by Jeff) does not ask anything overtly wrong; the iPhone is a perfectly valid topic, and asking for useful features has already been proven valid on other questions. The reason this is a bad question has nothing to do with its content as such, but rather that its answers are not going to actually matter to anyone, including the author of the question. Then again, had this been Steve Jobs asking the exact same question, it would be an entirely different matter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe what we need more than anything else is a close-reason *&quot;Leads to Inconsequential Answers&quot;*, which pretty much sums up most (all?) of the content people actually object to, while not outright black-listing specific topics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/8527/why-is-my-connection-to-playstation-network-so-unreliable-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/8735/whats-missing-from-the-iphone" />
  <row Id="229" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="137" RevisionGUID="952db507-89ab-43b2-9728-55a39ebbae0b" CreationDate="2009-07-18T16:14:27.843" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="230" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="138" RevisionGUID="7946bb78-e6ae-45c4-86fc-1cecdd6b92a9" CreationDate="2009-07-19T00:19:14.877" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="I had assumed that it *was* going to be the &quot;SO trash bin&quot; - a place for the folks who really don't see the point in restricting questions *at all*...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But most of the comments i've seen here since the beta opened seem to indicate a desire for a &quot;consumer ServerFault&quot; - gotta be a real question, gotta be *directly* computer-related. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMHO, that's a good thing. SO makes lousy forum software - restricting it to Q&amp;A seems like the only way to realize the advantages of the system. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, it's not gonna stop anyone from whining when their favorite, &quot;What's your favorite beverage to drink while playing Halo?&quot; question gets knocked down...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suspect the end result will be a combination of both: GTKY questions will be dumped on SU, forced into CW mode, and forgotten about. CW in turn will continue its evolution from &quot;more wiki mode&quot; to &quot;OT ghetto flag&quot;, eventually being replaced with a &quot;Pointless waste of time&quot; checkbox that disables rep, badges, editing, and replaces Markdown with BBCode. Oh, and also, gigantic animated avatars. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At night, the /b/tards come..." />
  <row Id="231" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="138" RevisionGUID="7946bb78-e6ae-45c4-86fc-1cecdd6b92a9" CreationDate="2009-07-19T00:19:14.877" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="139" RevisionGUID="b0f33840-eb03-4f61-95cf-827beb541508" CreationDate="2009-07-19T08:13:47.797" UserDisplayName="Marc Gravell" Text="How anything is anything? SU is not a trash bin either!&#xD;&#xA;-&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding [this SO question][1], and in particular some of the comments:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ...But with the catch-all superuser site...&#xD;&#xA; - ...would be relegated there...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the same grounds as [&quot;serverfault.com is not your trash bin!&quot;][2]; I ***really*** think we could do to clarify what &quot;goes&quot; on SU?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - is it *anything*? ([blog][3]: &quot;...if you wanted a community where (almost) anything goes...&quot;)&#xD;&#xA; - or do we still want to avoid the same types of things as we try to avoid on SO/SF, but simply with a different target audience? (which is my understanding, given the moderation).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Personally*** I'm mainly invested in SO - but I'd hate to see SU degenerate into a mess of pointless discussions about your favourite radio channel to listen to while surfing, etc...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1147433/best-computer-or-programming-wallpapers&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/4679/serverfault-com-is-not-your-trash-bin&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/super-user-semi-private-beta-begins/" />
  <row Id="233" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="139" RevisionGUID="b0f33840-eb03-4f61-95cf-827beb541508" CreationDate="2009-07-19T08:13:47.797" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="124" RevisionGUID="514ab8ba-2337-4f54-9337-5e735c73fcd1" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:56:38.247" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Jeff Atwood recently suggested that the community begin to help develop some guidelines as to what should be allowed on SuperUser.com so that it doesn't become the great big &quot;catch-all&quot; of computer talk on the internet (and the dumping ground of undesirable questions from StackOverlow and ServerFault).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This topic is to allow for users to begin to develop their ideas for:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Drawing the line(s) between Acceptable and Unacceptable content.&#xD;&#xA; - Develop reasons to close topics (such as Not Programming Related on StackOverflow)" />
  <row Id="235" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="124" RevisionGUID="514ab8ba-2337-4f54-9337-5e735c73fcd1" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:56:38.247" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Help Define SuperUser.Com" />
  <row Id="236" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="124" RevisionGUID="514ab8ba-2337-4f54-9337-5e735c73fcd1" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:56:38.247" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="237" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="124" RevisionGUID="514ab8ba-2337-4f54-9337-5e735c73fcd1" CreationDate="2009-07-15T17:56:38.247" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="238" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="124" RevisionGUID="fc753c62-749c-4057-af52-57d980bb35f0" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:25.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5778/help-define-superuser-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="141" RevisionGUID="eea5f0f1-e29a-4789-a6a4-88d54d461477" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:17:48.540" UserDisplayName="Chester" Text="&lt;kbd&gt;DONE&lt;/kbd&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;Nomination: [TheTXI][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nominated By: [RSolberg][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/users/22164/thetxi&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/users/55747/rsolberg" />
  <row Id="240" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="141" RevisionGUID="eea5f0f1-e29a-4789-a6a4-88d54d461477" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:17:48.540" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="142" RevisionGUID="706f3c33-7fcf-4116-bedc-1916e5e8d720" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:18:19.557" UserDisplayName="Chester" Text="Nomination: [Jonathan Sampson][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He is currently the top user on the site and is doing a great job for the community IMHO. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/519/jonathan-sampson" />
  <row Id="242" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="142" RevisionGUID="706f3c33-7fcf-4116-bedc-1916e5e8d720" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:18:19.557" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="143" RevisionGUID="f7f34cd2-3749-4af1-b180-6085e9972a0a" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:19:26.460" UserDisplayName="Hilarious Comedy Pesto" Text="Nomination: [Rich B][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/users/5640/rich-b" />
  <row Id="244" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="143" RevisionGUID="f7f34cd2-3749-4af1-b180-6085e9972a0a" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:19:26.460" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="144" RevisionGUID="1dfe7221-a9dc-45b8-b6d5-d00160ee375a" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:23:28.967" UserDisplayName="chaos" Text="Nomination: [Joel Coehoorn][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nominated By: [chaos][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/users/3043/joel-coehoorn&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/users/47529/chaos" />
  <row Id="246" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="144" RevisionGUID="1dfe7221-a9dc-45b8-b6d5-d00160ee375a" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:23:28.967" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="145" RevisionGUID="9a224d08-ceb0-4be0-a8b0-39d1c2dca2bc" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:23:53.747" UserDisplayName="Jon Erickson" Text="Nomination: [RSolberg][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nominated By: [Jon Erickson][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/55747/rsolberg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/users/1950/jon-erickson" />
  <row Id="248" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="145" RevisionGUID="9a224d08-ceb0-4be0-a8b0-39d1c2dca2bc" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:23:53.747" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="146" RevisionGUID="043881c4-3bfc-4345-8b5f-b025bc23b7da" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:26:09.420" UserDisplayName="Geoffrey Chetwood" Text="Nomination: [Pesto][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/users/23921/pesto" />
  <row Id="250" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="146" RevisionGUID="043881c4-3bfc-4345-8b5f-b025bc23b7da" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:26:09.420" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="147" RevisionGUID="32054ca8-fc58-40d1-9581-362688f75f4e" CreationDate="2009-07-16T16:57:16.387" UserDisplayName="Joel Coehoorn" Text="Nomination: [splattne][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nominated By: [Joel Coehoorn][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/187/splattne&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/users/3043/joel-coehoorn" />
  <row Id="252" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="147" RevisionGUID="32054ca8-fc58-40d1-9581-362688f75f4e" CreationDate="2009-07-16T16:57:16.387" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="148" RevisionGUID="57d893ef-5fbf-48e8-82e3-b9a64e8cd49e" CreationDate="2009-07-17T16:55:31.610" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Nomination: [Jon Skeet](http://superuser.com/users/410/jon-skeet)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nominated By: [Diago](http://superuser.com/users/114/diago)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He's already well trusted in the community and as a moderator on SO can manage questions that may need to be moved easily." />
  <row Id="254" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="148" RevisionGUID="57d893ef-5fbf-48e8-82e3-b9a64e8cd49e" CreationDate="2009-07-17T16:55:31.610" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="140" RevisionGUID="61906d8d-27de-4fae-8fc6-3cc347521731" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:17:26.503" UserDisplayName="Chester" Text="I'm not sure that this will be the right venue for this discussion or not and hope I don't step on anyone's toes, but with the effort now underway to define what is acceptable for the new SU.com, I was thinking that we may need to get some moderators over there sooner than later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since we already have 3 other sites with reputation at this point, I think we have a great base for trusted users.  If the goal of SU is to maintain the Q&amp;A format we've all grown to love and hate at times, then why not start with some mods that have the experience already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If our current SO, SF, and META mods do not have mod access on SU, I think that they should.  I also think it would be great to nominate some folks in this post for mod duties." />
  <row Id="256" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="140" RevisionGUID="61906d8d-27de-4fae-8fc6-3cc347521731" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:17:26.503" UserDisplayName="Chester" Text="SuperUser.com Moderator Nomination" />
  <row Id="257" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="140" RevisionGUID="61906d8d-27de-4fae-8fc6-3cc347521731" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:17:26.503" UserDisplayName="Chester" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;moderator-nomination&gt;" />
  <row Id="258" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="140" RevisionGUID="61906d8d-27de-4fae-8fc6-3cc347521731" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:17:26.503" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="259" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="140" RevisionGUID="5a8d1cb4-792b-4d7b-953c-ecd12fe22ab0" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:27.683" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5787/superuser-com-moderator-nomination" Text="" />
  <row Id="260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="150" RevisionGUID="704e9aed-dd21-4833-aa82-4622fda70175" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:35:59.610" UserDisplayName="Juan Manuel" Text="You flag questions because people don't mark it as CW?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh my..." />
  <row Id="261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="149" RevisionGUID="b206ed2a-950e-4db0-a9c8-c9d7b2ea3548" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:30:35.473" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I agree and respect the Moderator notification limit on the site for flagging content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However during the SuperUser Beta can this be lifted. There is a few questions that need to be  reviewed, and I for one ran out of my flag limit. During Beta I think it is important to be able to flag more then the normal amount of questions?" />
  <row Id="262" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="149" RevisionGUID="b206ed2a-950e-4db0-a9c8-c9d7b2ea3548" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:30:35.473" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Remove Moderator Notification Limit during SuperUser Beta" />
  <row Id="263" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="149" RevisionGUID="b206ed2a-950e-4db0-a9c8-c9d7b2ea3548" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:30:35.473" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="264" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="149" RevisionGUID="5d8689d4-9631-4425-824e-5b2352503247" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:29.610" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5801/remove-moderator-notification-limit-during-superuser-beta" Text="" />
  <row Id="265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="152" RevisionGUID="50b41b67-3483-4d59-8fcd-5599e51c559f" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:59:34.687" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="I agree, it should be clearer that even though you have an account on a sister site you'll still need to create a new account on SU, and then optionally associate it with the other accounts." />
  <row Id="266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="153" RevisionGUID="d38042c7-f4a7-4920-9066-a8ebbdf7c782" CreationDate="2009-07-15T19:02:23.507" UserDisplayName="chaos" Text="Yeah, it should say &quot;that we haven't seen before *on superuser.com*&quot; and &quot;with an existing superuser.com account&quot;." />
  <row Id="267" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="151" RevisionGUID="1e79c089-cfbc-4668-8c50-c2ba701d2211" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:55:45.080" UserDisplayName="Alex B" Text="&gt; Superuser gave me this error when I tried to login:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This is an OpenID we haven't seen before:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; *openid text here*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Do you want to create a new Super User account with this OpenID?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (If you want to associate this OpenID with an existing account, click Cancel, log in under your existing account, then click the New Login link on your user page.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think this is poorly written because the way to associate my account is to click &quot;New Login&quot; (opposite of what is written) and then choose associate with stackoverflow accounts." />
  <row Id="268" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="151" RevisionGUID="1e79c089-cfbc-4668-8c50-c2ba701d2211" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:55:45.080" UserDisplayName="Alex B" Text="superuser openid query text is misleading" />
  <row Id="269" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="151" RevisionGUID="1e79c089-cfbc-4668-8c50-c2ba701d2211" CreationDate="2009-07-15T18:55:45.080" UserDisplayName="Alex B" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;openid&gt;" />
  <row Id="270" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="151" RevisionGUID="cf4131ce-dd09-435b-b439-6fc6dbf9d328" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:30.213" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5815/superuser-openid-query-text-is-misleading" Text="" />
  <row Id="271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="155" RevisionGUID="29d2aa5a-49b9-4e1f-ada4-996a311ac8c5" CreationDate="2009-07-15T20:14:36.323" UserDisplayName="Andy Mikula" Text="I disagree! I think questions without answers **should** look out of place. It's a community focused on asking and answering questions - no answers strikes me as something that should stand out." />
  <row Id="272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="156" RevisionGUID="ba1e3c86-81ec-46c7-8203-efdfc15c10e0" CreationDate="2009-07-15T20:23:21.523" UserDisplayName="chaos" Text="On my monitor, it doesn't look black, it looks like a *really* deep burgundy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regardless, I think it could be made to stand out without clashing.  I'd suggest trying something in the yellows." />
  <row Id="273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="158" RevisionGUID="bd61b6d6-d40c-40ac-ba2d-82cd9e784273" CreationDate="2009-07-15T20:55:04.557" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="It's good that it's noticeable, but bad that it doesn't appear to fit well with the rest of the site. I'd prefer to see a lighter shade used, and used on the text and border rather than the background.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Oh, and round corners like the tags - then it'll only look like crap on IE...][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://shog9.com/proposed-lonely-question.png" />
  <row Id="274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="157" RevisionGUID="a6a9927f-5dec-4393-8002-081f9d65812a" CreationDate="2009-07-15T20:30:27.063" UserDisplayName="Pete" Text="Agreed:  It's way too dark!  Change the value (as in HSV) on the burgundy to be a little lighter." />
  <row Id="275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="154" RevisionGUID="783fd43a-6c79-47ab-85e3-769c52c8ed1e" CreationDate="2009-07-15T20:12:22.147" UserDisplayName="Joel Coehoorn" Text="The &quot;0 Answers&quot; style on SuperUser looks horrid/out of place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You know the one I'm talking about, the big burgundy box of badness.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![one is not really the loneliest number, nor blue the saddest color][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://shog9.com/lonely-question.png" />
  <row Id="276" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="154" RevisionGUID="783fd43a-6c79-47ab-85e3-769c52c8ed1e" CreationDate="2009-07-15T20:12:22.147" UserDisplayName="Joel Coehoorn" Text="Please change the &quot;0 Answers&quot; style on SuperUser." />
  <row Id="277" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="154" RevisionGUID="783fd43a-6c79-47ab-85e3-769c52c8ed1e" CreationDate="2009-07-15T20:12:22.147" UserDisplayName="Joel Coehoorn" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;color&gt;" />
  <row Id="278" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="154" RevisionGUID="de09e1c1-759b-45a3-bf90-82a88b562a31" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:30.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5847/please-change-the-0-answers-style-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="160" RevisionGUID="f6fceeaf-ac10-40ae-befb-8513b6f4bc43" CreationDate="2009-07-15T20:24:09.707" UserDisplayName="Chester" Text="Take a look here:&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/super-user-semi-private-beta-begins/" />
  <row Id="280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="159" RevisionGUID="6adfdaa6-b905-4814-ab14-7bd5e5e6a009" CreationDate="2009-07-15T20:22:07.730" UserDisplayName="Pete" Text="I'd like to beta test for [superuser.com][1], which states that it's in &quot;private testing&quot;.  How do I get a login &amp; join in on the testing madness?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.superuser.com" />
  <row Id="281" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="159" RevisionGUID="6adfdaa6-b905-4814-ab14-7bd5e5e6a009" CreationDate="2009-07-15T20:22:07.730" UserDisplayName="Pete" Text="How do I get on the superuser.com beta?" />
  <row Id="282" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="159" RevisionGUID="6adfdaa6-b905-4814-ab14-7bd5e5e6a009" CreationDate="2009-07-15T20:22:07.730" UserDisplayName="Pete" Text="&lt;beta&gt;" />
  <row Id="283" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="159" RevisionGUID="123f10a9-81e3-4471-9029-33f6452a88ef" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:31.710" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5853/how-do-i-get-on-the-superuser-com-beta" Text="" />
  <row Id="284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="162" RevisionGUID="8987a7e9-fdaa-4113-95de-2b604e72963e" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:15:43.873" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="I couldn't reproduce. What are your specs?" />
  <row Id="285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="163" RevisionGUID="d5272d83-21ba-4dda-bd9c-fa4ba3415d51" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:18:53.610" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="I don't think this is a bug with SuperUser as it is more of an issue with all of the sites. There are numerous times when you use the sites and the up or down arrow will be displayed as marked even if you aren't marking it anymore. This can be anywhere from marking and then getting an error (as you stated above) or marking, then taking away your vote, then backing to another page and then forward again. I don't necessarily think this is much of a problem and I don't find it that confusing. If it does get confusing, people will just refresh the page and then see whether or not their vote was actually counted." />
  <row Id="286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="164" RevisionGUID="694b8986-f500-46f0-ac63-7987fe8e1adc" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:29:23.817" UserDisplayName="Ehtyar" Text="I also have the same issue. I'm certain it's not a bug, though it is a nasty &quot;feature&quot; that I'd prefer was not a part of the private BETA, given the standing of those participating in it. Perhaps we could increase the limit during the BETA and/or for those with a certain level of reputation or some other metric?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[edit]&#xD;&#xA;I worked it out. 30 votes per day is far too few IMHO.&#xD;&#xA;[/edit]" />
  <row Id="287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="165" RevisionGUID="57af56fc-424e-477d-a005-82a7620494c5" CreationDate="2009-07-16T08:43:36.010" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="There is a request [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5801/remove-moderator-notification-limit-during-superuser-beta) to have the flag limit increased:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="161" RevisionGUID="144ca1d0-f712-4ee9-815a-0cb5d4e7f268" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:01:38.067" UserDisplayName="Lucas Jones" Text="I've noticed an asthetic bug on SuperUser - I'm not sure if it affects any other sites. Basically, I've reached the daily voting limit, and clicked on the vote up button. While an error was received, the vote count and &quot;depressed&quot; image stayed until I refreshed the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This could confuse possible users of the site, as they may be left wondering whether their vote was processed. Especially since we're not dealing necessarily with programmers and sysadmins - users who may not be completely comfortable with computers." />
  <row Id="289" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="161" RevisionGUID="144ca1d0-f712-4ee9-815a-0cb5d4e7f268" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:01:38.067" UserDisplayName="Lucas Jones" Text="Superuser bug - daily vote limit reached" />
  <row Id="290" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="161" RevisionGUID="144ca1d0-f712-4ee9-815a-0cb5d4e7f268" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:01:38.067" UserDisplayName="Lucas Jones" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;" />
  <row Id="291" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="161" RevisionGUID="e0d4379c-9344-4776-9464-7a9ddf899953" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:32.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5899/superuser-bug-daily-vote-limit-reached" Text="" />
  <row Id="292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="167" RevisionGUID="6f988013-44ec-4a67-b438-797074f81c19" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:14:52.343" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="I think it's best NOT to repeat it in other locations, as it may change in the future. That would cause problems for people trying to find the current. It's best to point users to the original source." />
  <row Id="293" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="168" RevisionGUID="4e15f24f-a133-4cf5-942d-fcec5e71bb9c" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:14:56.493" UserDisplayName="Andy Mikula" Text="No, in fact, it's been posted already: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5853/how-do-i-get-on-the-superuser-com-beta&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(okay, a link to it has been posted...)" />
  <row Id="294" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="170" RevisionGUID="a8f58584-7326-48ad-9b4f-fde9a4472f94" CreationDate="2009-07-16T08:12:36.397" Text="just link to the blog entry, so we can change the password if need be." />
  <row Id="295" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="169" RevisionGUID="daa4a7e1-5c5d-41b6-93df-82971b3d3b7c" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:17:00.807" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Joel Cohoorn has posted it here on Meta before in response to someone just posting the blog link. I assume that's as close as you'll get to a thumbs up without Atwood coming in and saying it himself." />
  <row Id="296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="166" RevisionGUID="5339c424-6aaf-467b-9a4b-af9e38e3b52f" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:12:50.307" UserDisplayName="Andrew Grimm" Text="(Please don't mention the password in answers or comments!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are questions asking about the password for super user forbidden?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, the information is available elsewhere, but so is info on how the turtle moves." />
  <row Id="297" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="166" RevisionGUID="5339c424-6aaf-467b-9a4b-af9e38e3b52f" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:12:50.307" UserDisplayName="Andrew Grimm" Text="Is discussing the super user password forbidden?" />
  <row Id="298" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="166" RevisionGUID="5339c424-6aaf-467b-9a4b-af9e38e3b52f" CreationDate="2009-07-15T23:12:50.307" UserDisplayName="Andrew Grimm" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="299" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="166" RevisionGUID="9c24513d-5dc8-4b11-a1e8-6b9100746c1d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:55:32.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5902/is-discussing-the-super-user-password-forbidden" Text="" />
  <row Id="300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="172" RevisionGUID="7be2b079-fc06-4777-b469-db9a98baa199" CreationDate="2009-07-16T00:43:59.407" UserDisplayName="Daniel Moura" Text="I think the tag should be splited. software product recommendation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So a question about software recommendation should have two tags, software and recommendation." />
  <row Id="301" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="173" RevisionGUID="e5346c58-27f4-4be6-93eb-eb145f426eb4" CreationDate="2009-07-27T05:55:27.023" UserDisplayName="TM" Text="Personally I'd rather see these questions getting closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems to me a good chunk of them are written by people (possibly marketers) who ALREADY know the answer they want to accept when they ask the question.   Somebody asks a question about &quot;the best ____&quot; and then they accept an arbitrary answer within a few minutes (by arbitrary, I mean an answer with the same amount of votes as many others).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have they really gone out and bought that product and decided that it was the best?   Is this type of question even worth having?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like the concept of superuser, but frankly, at this early stage it reads like a series of advertisements rather than questions/answers." />
  <row Id="302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="175" RevisionGUID="44005b9b-9d55-469a-ab33-1d3062d6e131" CreationDate="2009-07-28T13:21:36.693" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Where along its short life did SuperUser become the product recommendation and what to buy advice service? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Isn't that what the plethora of reviews out there are all about? They're all biased anyway. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Merge questions with [*-recommendation] tags into the ether. Or back to the forums from whence they came.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If wanting synonyms, label them for what they are, [*-pimp|plug]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###(ommendation)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looks like `trim()` has already happened, *-recommendation cut down to tags just like  [&lt;kbd&gt;software-rec&lt;/kbd&gt;][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/software-rec" />
  <row Id="303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="174" RevisionGUID="7720ffae-6cb6-4cfa-84b8-07fc56bbbc5d" CreationDate="2009-07-27T10:51:43.217" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="It depends on what will make those posts searchable. If you make recommendation a single tag you can couple that with whatever you want: software, hardware or whatnot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding closing these questions due to arbitrary votes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My personal take on this is that I don't accept an answer until there are at least some upvotes or when I tried it out and it was an actual solution, which is exactly what I was asking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the solution to the problem you have is that these questions don't have one correct answer and therefore should be community wiki. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though still only one answer can be chosen as accepted, at least the person doesn't get more rep than he &quot;deserves&quot;." />
  <row Id="304" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="176" RevisionGUID="7d53b15c-a971-4e82-9eb1-9454f98fd76b" CreationDate="2010-06-28T00:47:30.340" UserDisplayName="user148358" Text="I think there shall be a separate section on the site dedicated to product reviews. I myself had found answers to my &quot;what is the best ___&quot; here, on SO. I assert that if there is a dedicated section, with functionality specifically tailored to product rating - it will be used and will be useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem with all the review sites, is that those are biased. Here, I can expect that most of recommendations will come from experienced engineers. I would also add a 500 rep requirement, before you can put your opinion there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think 'accept' feature would make no sense in the said section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do realize such section would be a deviation from SO main stream, but IMHO SO would be a perfect place to have such information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Summary of the summary: I need product reviews from trusted source, and forcing that sort of information into a regular question form is a stretch. So I propose you add separate section just for that sort of information." />
  <row Id="305" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="171" RevisionGUID="139a7173-d787-4267-a6d1-6929fcb6e8c3" CreationDate="2009-07-16T00:30:39.927" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="On SuperUser there are lots of questions which are looking for product recommendations for various purposes. These can range between hardware, software, or other types of products. Right now there are two tags which are serving most of these purposes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - software-recommendation&#xD;&#xA; - product-recommendation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should we think about merging these tags and attempt to steer future questions into a single selection, or should we move towards specific tags dependent on what type of product they are looking for recommendation on (software/hardware/service/product/etc.)?" />
  <row Id="306" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="171" RevisionGUID="139a7173-d787-4267-a6d1-6929fcb6e8c3" CreationDate="2009-07-16T00:30:39.927" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="SuperUser Tagging Question: Software/Hardware/Product Recommendations" />
  <row Id="307" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="171" RevisionGUID="139a7173-d787-4267-a6d1-6929fcb6e8c3" CreationDate="2009-07-16T00:30:39.927" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tagging&gt;" />
  <row Id="308" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="171" RevisionGUID="ae130e2b-9fd8-4b5c-81a5-215a8804cbb5" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:42.623" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5935/superuser-tagging-question-software-hardware-product-recommendations" Text="" />
  <row Id="309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="178" RevisionGUID="371f1364-997d-4f41-9d78-e61ae46e8c8f" CreationDate="2009-07-16T02:08:54.743" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Now that you bring it up I am seeing the same behavior. Overall it doesn't bother me (I've never actually been a fan of different colors for visited links myself) too much, but I can see why it could be an annoyance to other users." />
  <row Id="310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="179" RevisionGUID="5c7f9258-547b-4c16-bd1c-2193cc98b785" CreationDate="2009-07-16T06:49:46.117" UserDisplayName="mark4o" Text="This has been very annoying for me.  A lot of questions have similar titles and it is difficult to know if it is a question you've already looked at when the colors are all the same." />
  <row Id="311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="180" RevisionGUID="b108a8ca-38bf-4f65-9dad-8c7cfe54eda5" CreationDate="2009-07-16T07:16:52.023" UserDisplayName="Ralph Rickenbach" Text="Most people after a certain age (usually 40-45 years) start having problems distinguishing shades of blue. Even though we all think it looks cool, with the internet community including this age group too (and increasingly, as we all get older), color schemes based on mainly shades of blue should be avoided. Especially light blue fonts on dark blue background, but also - as is the case here - similar shades of blue to distinguish properties of the content." />
  <row Id="312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="181" RevisionGUID="a1e4ea66-b83e-4c96-84e5-d277f05e6a08" CreationDate="2009-07-16T08:07:30.413" Text="We actually did *not* have different color links for visited on Super User. An oversight. I just changed this, so visited links are now lighter." />
  <row Id="313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="177" RevisionGUID="e5d77b15-16a1-47d8-a7f3-13c9216aa964" CreationDate="2009-07-16T02:07:21.017" UserDisplayName="erichui" Text="I can't seem to determine which questions I've browsed to on superuser based upon the coloring of the link.  As far as I can tell (maybe I'm color blind), there is no difference between the coloring of browsed and un-browsed links.  In contrast, on SO/SF/META, the coloring of browsed links is pretty obvious." />
  <row Id="314" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="177" RevisionGUID="e5d77b15-16a1-47d8-a7f3-13c9216aa964" CreationDate="2009-07-16T02:07:21.017" UserDisplayName="erichui" Text="Superuser color for followed links" />
  <row Id="315" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="177" RevisionGUID="e5d77b15-16a1-47d8-a7f3-13c9216aa964" CreationDate="2009-07-16T02:07:21.017" UserDisplayName="erichui" Text="&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;color&gt;" />
  <row Id="316" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="177" RevisionGUID="67bce194-dfaf-408e-b13d-84a0c234637a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:43.377" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5963/superuser-color-for-followed-links" Text="" />
  <row Id="317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="183" RevisionGUID="cc94b863-ed7f-4c0b-ba3f-90268ad45f9e" CreationDate="2009-07-16T04:01:37.750" UserDisplayName="Justin 'jjnguy' Nelson" Text="IMHO tags should be used as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- internet-explorer: general IE questions&#xD;&#xA;- ie`X`: if specific browser version&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If an ie`X` tag is on a post, internet-explorer should be too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason for this is because `ie6`, `ie7` and so on are just as popular of search terms as `Internet Explorer`." />
  <row Id="318" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="184" RevisionGUID="21c6e9fb-8444-4084-b1fc-45fdf3caaf1b" CreationDate="2010-04-08T20:19:54.693" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="It's been a while since this was brought up, so I'm bumping this back to the front page to take the community's temperature.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Current tag usage:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Tag                   SU  SO  SF&#xD;&#xA;[internet-explorer]   &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;224&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;~3k&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://serverfault.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;67&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;[internet-explorer-6]  &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer-6&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;23&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer-6&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;7&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://serverfault.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer-6&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;[internet-explorer-7]  &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer-7&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;23&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer-7&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;23&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://serverfault.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer-7&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;[internet-explorer-8] &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer-8&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;145&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer-8&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;48&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://serverfault.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer-8&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;[ie]                    &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ie&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/ie&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;418&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://serverfault.com/questions/tagged/ie&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;26&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;[ie6]                   &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ie6&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/ie6&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;746&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://serverfault.com/questions/tagged/ie6&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;14&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;[ie7]                   &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ie7&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/ie7&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;654&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://serverfault.com/questions/tagged/ie7&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;9&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;[ie8]                   &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ie8&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/ie8&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;628&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://serverfault.com/questions/tagged/ie8&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;51&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So Super User currently has it a bit backwards from SO &amp; SF.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have no personal preference for which tags get used.  Considerations:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [ieX] tags are shorter...&#xD;&#xA; - [internet-explorer] + [ieX] tags are slightly confusing...&#xD;&#xA; - [internet-explorer-X] tags are easy to search on with the ~ wildcard... (a URL like http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/internet-explorer~ gets all tags in one shot; http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/ie~ only grabs the [ie] tag)&#xD;&#xA; - synchronizing the tag conventions might help tag maintainers keep their sanity, since the &quot;wrong tags&quot; keep getting recreated anytime one of these questions is migrated to/from SU...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="5456b59e-ddb0-47f9-817e-14d483adae08" CreationDate="2009-07-16T03:57:17.003" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="So far questions on Super User are being branched off into separate tagging conventions with regards to Internet Explorer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ie&#xD;&#xA; - internet-explorer&#xD;&#xA; - ie8, internet-explorer-8, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am posting this to try and head this off early so that we can nail down a standard convention for these class of posts. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My personal preference would be for internet-explorer with version specific questions being internet-explorer-8, etc." />
  <row Id="320" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="5456b59e-ddb0-47f9-817e-14d483adae08" CreationDate="2009-07-16T03:57:17.003" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Super User's Internet Explorer tagging convention" />
  <row Id="321" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="5456b59e-ddb0-47f9-817e-14d483adae08" CreationDate="2009-07-16T03:57:17.003" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tagging&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="322" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="bac1ac3c-60de-4198-ae34-dc03e423292f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:43.643" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5986/super-users-internet-explorer-tagging-convention" Text="" />
  <row Id="323" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="186" RevisionGUID="fb9f0e8f-209d-4012-b87c-4cd235b92939" CreationDate="2009-07-16T11:07:35.030" UserDisplayName="Rowland Shaw" Text="The correct approach would be to contact the firewall vendor and get them to reclassify the site in their blacklists - then it gets fixed for everyone using that firewall. The existing classification may relate to the domain's earlier life.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The blacklists used by these firewalls (and proxies, for that matter) are really quite flawed (For instance, http://www.ipswich.angle.uk.com/ is in a different category to http://www.ipswich-angle.com/ even though they're the same site)" />
  <row Id="324" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="187" RevisionGUID="f08e2631-0a84-42ac-904e-1b31d1d523f9" CreationDate="2009-07-17T20:14:15.803" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="I actually have this issue (and I'm a moderator!) and it does get rather annoying trying to deal with games questions (only way I can get to them is through the iPhone while I am at work, otherwise they have to wait).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It was rather easy to convince my boss to whitelist stackoverflow because it was actually programming related. I don't think I would have the same luck asking him to whitelist superuser." />
  <row Id="325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="189" RevisionGUID="2ff2fdb0-b600-4fcb-92ce-ac78838ea98b" CreationDate="2009-07-18T06:48:03.220" Text="Maybe we should disallow gaming questions for this reason, then.." />
  <row Id="326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="188" RevisionGUID="611240df-63d4-459c-8f3e-92875f47e53a" CreationDate="2009-07-17T20:33:39.273" UserDisplayName="Joel Coehoorn" Text="You've got it easy: I don't have good access to the main StackOverflow site from work anymore :(" />
  <row Id="327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="185" RevisionGUID="fea386ec-e3b8-4c5a-a6f3-d1921d368a0a" CreationDate="2009-07-16T08:07:31.207" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Due to the questions regarding gaming and consoles on the SuperUser site our corporate firewall just blocked SuperUser as a gaming site and completely blocks access.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do you convince your IT team to unblock this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note that the value of SuperUser is not always as obvious to others as it is to the existing users, or those with the experience on the Trilogy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(In my case it's simple, they unblock it solely because I ask them to, but how would others be able to motivate this in their environments?)" />
  <row Id="328" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="185" RevisionGUID="fea386ec-e3b8-4c5a-a6f3-d1921d368a0a" CreationDate="2009-07-16T08:07:31.207" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="SuperUser.com blocked by corporate firewall" />
  <row Id="329" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="185" RevisionGUID="fea386ec-e3b8-4c5a-a6f3-d1921d368a0a" CreationDate="2009-07-16T08:07:31.207" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="330" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="185" RevisionGUID="69cbc423-c611-427d-a41b-7ef8c39c8b40" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:44.203" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6013/superuser-com-blocked-by-corporate-firewall" Text="" />
  <row Id="331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="190" RevisionGUID="e5ccd40f-fa33-44fb-a905-f0e2dc3d41dc" CreationDate="2009-07-16T10:32:18.907" UserDisplayName="Thor K.H" Text="At the moment, the vote counter for accepted answers are not properly aligned. &#xD;&#xA;This is due to there being no border on them, making them &quot;ditch&quot; to the left a little bit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could be easily solved by:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .answered-accepted {&#xD;&#xA;     background-color:#71A311;&#xD;&#xA;     /* currently: border:medium none; */&#xD;&#xA;     /* better: */ border:2px solid transparent;&#xD;&#xA;     color:#FFFFFF;&#xD;&#xA;    }" />
  <row Id="332" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="190" RevisionGUID="e5ccd40f-fa33-44fb-a905-f0e2dc3d41dc" CreationDate="2009-07-16T10:32:18.907" UserDisplayName="Thor K.H" Text="SuperUser CSS &quot;bug&quot; - accepted answer's vote indicator showing up on your page not properly aligned" />
  <row Id="333" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="190" RevisionGUID="e5ccd40f-fa33-44fb-a905-f0e2dc3d41dc" CreationDate="2009-07-16T10:32:18.907" UserDisplayName="Thor K.H" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="334" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="190" RevisionGUID="f50f7a3f-d265-4239-8303-536352d639c3" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:44.747" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6056/superuser-css-bug-accepted-answers-vote-indicator-showing-up-on-your-page-no" Text="" />
  <row Id="335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="192" RevisionGUID="84fd974e-51aa-43b9-a120-d8c52f705e3c" CreationDate="2009-07-16T17:19:31.463" Text="We've been caching the homepage for almost a year now. Wait 60 seconds.." />
  <row Id="336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="191" RevisionGUID="2ef36b24-c65e-4839-95f4-df8829600984" CreationDate="2009-07-16T12:04:37.833" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I replied to a question on SuperUser [here](http://superuser.com/questions/5334/how-to-create-a-torrent-and-share-with-others). The problem came in when I went back to the SuperUser home page and looked at the question, it showed an update by someone else, however apart from voting the question had not changed at all. Is this a caching delay maybe?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;i&gt;(I am unable to post screenshots from work since all free hosting sites are blocked, but will upload later today)&lt;/i&gt;" />
  <row Id="337" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="191" RevisionGUID="2ef36b24-c65e-4839-95f4-df8829600984" CreationDate="2009-07-16T12:04:37.833" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Potential Bug: See who voted last?" />
  <row Id="338" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="191" RevisionGUID="2ef36b24-c65e-4839-95f4-df8829600984" CreationDate="2009-07-16T12:04:37.833" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;votes&gt;" />
  <row Id="339" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="191" RevisionGUID="f2043864-5331-497e-9779-645baa0ddec1" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:44.883" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6087/potential-bug-see-who-voted-last" Text="" />
  <row Id="340" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="194" RevisionGUID="fd894747-ba8b-412b-9fcf-377410644cdb" CreationDate="2009-07-16T12:52:35.073" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="The nature of your question determines (in most cases) the nature of your responses. The silly questions are getting silly responses. The more serious questions are getting serious responses. If your family asks a serious question, I'm confident the system will work to their benefit." />
  <row Id="341" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="196" RevisionGUID="b52b616c-a9a3-40fb-93fd-85a535ac37c9" CreationDate="2009-07-16T12:54:02.070" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="1. I think the &quot;Must-Have&quot; questions are going to die out very quickly (and I have been pretty quick to bump them to CW status if they did not start that way) because they will eventually run out of subjects to &quot;must have&quot; something. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. I am seeing some very good questions already concerning problems that people are having in various forms (whether it is networking, UI, browser issues, OS issues, etc.). I think over time these will become the dominant styles of questions as the more discussion-oriented topics start to die down.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. I am also seeing a very large set of product recommendation questions, which I believe SuperUser could potentially excel at. With such a large audience of technical users, it could become the go-to place for making recommendations when people come and say &quot;I need a free/cheap/fast/powerful solution at doing Task X&quot;. What I have tried to do is make minor revisions to some questions that simply try to say &quot;what is the best X&quot; and turn them into more product-recommendation questions. If I am unable to revise, I will generally ask the OP to be more specific about what they are looking for.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Overall I think with some more gentle nudging, the direction of SuperUser will quickly turn into more of a Q&amp;A + Product Recommendation engine than the garbage dump that most people feared it would turn into at first glance." />
  <row Id="342" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="197" RevisionGUID="dcb4c6a9-7612-4146-bea1-04d7c1146091" CreationDate="2009-07-16T12:54:44.143" UserDisplayName="Rob Allen" Text="My suggestion is to make a new tab which contains one big text box for asking a question. Instead of the ajax look-up of similar questions though, the user would hit a button and get back search results. If those results are unsatisfactory, then they click something else to go to the real &quot;ask a question&quot; dialog with their query pre-populated. That tab would be the default home/landing page for anonymous users and logged in people below 100 rep (or some other low threshold).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is to prevent users from seeing the main list of questions until they have some understanding of the site and how it works. " />
  <row Id="343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="198" RevisionGUID="df574790-d8a5-484e-ac0d-52740706cea0" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:30:00.847" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="For some reason I have really got involved in SuperUser, however slowly getting disheartened  in the system working for the particular subject matter SuperUser is targeting. Based on the feedback here on Meta and some of the comments on SuperUser there is a lot of gray areas that need to be addressed around the community wiki's for example. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am hoping that as mentioned the noise will start to lessen, however I am concerned with the potential of losing some very good members along the way. " />
  <row Id="344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="195" RevisionGUID="ecd8f896-761a-4c97-a672-869389844630" CreationDate="2009-07-16T12:53:00.550" UserDisplayName="Simon P Stevens" Text="I think you make the point yourself. There is a lot of noise right now because it's essentially a community of experienced developers/it-admins asking questions on a site where they probably already know most of the answers because they are after some rep. Once it settles down a bit, goes public and gets some real users the more experienced people will stop asking random &quot;must have x&quot; questions and focus on answering the real questions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, once all the possible &quot;must have x&quot; questions have been asked, we can start closing futures ones as duplicates." />
  <row Id="345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="193" RevisionGUID="e0317e3e-973a-4f5f-ab87-c23b1ab8e6fa" CreationDate="2009-07-16T12:47:44.670" UserDisplayName="Rob Allen" Text="SuperUser has been open for beta for a very short time and already the flurry of questions is overwhelming and vast. There is a lot of noise (i.e. &quot;Must have...&quot;) and very little signal at this point as beta users try to get rep. I expect that to change over time as more novice users ask questions which are meaningful to them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The concern I have is sending my father-in-law, mother, or other non-geek to SuperUser.com to get a question answered because I think they will be overwhelmed. I know a bulk of the traffic will come from search engines, but what small changes can be made (without effecting the overall code base too much) to make skipping Google and coming right to SuperUser more effective?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, really bad example on my part. Try this instead: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assume you are a complete SO/Meta/Serverfault/SuperUser newbie and you have a problem with your HP Printer. Your geek guru says to check SuperUser for a solution. When you arrive at SuperUser _everything_ not having to do with HP Printers is noise. It takes mental time and energy to look away from the list of irrelevant (to you) questions and find the Ask A Question button. The search box is one of the least visible items on the screen so existing answers may remain hidden if you do not phrase your question exactly right. Then 10 minutes after you ask your question it gets closed as Exact Duplicate of a somewhat related question. How likely are you to then stay and contribute to the site? How likely are you to continue to look to this site for answers to your question? Assume the Exact Duplicate is actually slightly different and doesn't help. Now what? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="346" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="193" RevisionGUID="e0317e3e-973a-4f5f-ab87-c23b1ab8e6fa" CreationDate="2009-07-16T12:47:44.670" UserDisplayName="Rob Allen" Text="maintaining superuser signal to noise for new users" />
  <row Id="347" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="193" RevisionGUID="e0317e3e-973a-4f5f-ab87-c23b1ab8e6fa" CreationDate="2009-07-16T12:47:44.670" UserDisplayName="Rob Allen" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;new-users&gt;&lt;usability&gt;" />
  <row Id="348" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="193" RevisionGUID="282517f8-15ee-4f64-b1aa-b3a9158f9555" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:45.037" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6101/maintaining-superuser-signal-to-noise-for-new-users" Text="" />
  <row Id="353" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="201" RevisionGUID="7e92c2f5-e3e0-4296-ac39-150634d30d27" CreationDate="2009-07-16T15:21:55.527" UserDisplayName="Blixt" Text="That's actually the way the browser renders rounded corners. It can be fixed by using a background image instead of `border-radius`, but it will most likely be &quot;fixed&quot; in Chrome sooner or later." />
  <row Id="354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="202" RevisionGUID="0b8471a9-9d2a-4c2e-9db3-3f337345bd00" CreationDate="2009-07-16T15:44:13.550" UserDisplayName="random" Text="In **Opera** 9.61, the tags look like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://imgur.com/I8qcZ.png" />
  <row Id="355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="203" RevisionGUID="7a0ad44c-7124-4c36-bf6a-9129b75565f5" CreationDate="2009-07-16T16:10:24.323" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="The border looks fine in other contexts (not at the end of the line in the header at the bottom of the page). So this is a bug in Chrome - likely miscalculating the clipping region.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Just checked this in the latest Chromium nightly - it's even *worse*! Ha!" />
  <row Id="356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="200" RevisionGUID="c4e33c18-3e08-46a7-b621-570429047487" CreationDate="2009-07-16T14:42:03.967" UserDisplayName="hmemcpy" Text="I just noticed this at the bottom of [this question][1] on SU:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Chrome 2.0.172.33**&#xD;&#xA;![Chrome][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Firefox 3.5**&#xD;&#xA;![Firefox][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT** Can anyone with Chrome 3 take a look and tell us if it's wrong there too?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/5321/whats-the-most-stupid-thing-youve-experienced-a-technical-impaired-doing-with-a&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i26.tinypic.com/14inaeb.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i29.tinypic.com/219xk5s.png" />
  <row Id="357" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="200" RevisionGUID="c4e33c18-3e08-46a7-b621-570429047487" CreationDate="2009-07-16T14:42:03.967" UserDisplayName="hmemcpy" Text="SuperUser bug: badge border is cut off in Chrome, fine in Firefox" />
  <row Id="358" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="200" RevisionGUID="c4e33c18-3e08-46a7-b621-570429047487" CreationDate="2009-07-16T14:42:03.967" UserDisplayName="hmemcpy" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-deferred&gt;" />
  <row Id="359" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="200" RevisionGUID="72d25d23-9406-4c06-857b-40d2aa4090ad" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:46.223" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6132/superuser-bug-badge-border-is-cut-off-in-chrome-fine-in-firefox" Text="" />
  <row Id="360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="205" RevisionGUID="aa353233-5403-455b-b57a-bb6d47711601" CreationDate="2009-07-16T17:23:53.523" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="I would stick with &quot;windows&quot; as the most broad tag and then &quot;windows-[version]&quot; as the specific ones (&quot;windows-xp&quot;, &quot;windows-vista&quot;, etc.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you come across things you think need retagged, you can flag and one of us will take a look at it, you can also email me directly (my address is listed on my SU profile page).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think if we take care of these early, we won't need to worry about a big and potentially messy tag merge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is currently taken care of on Super User." />
  <row Id="361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="204" RevisionGUID="4f9f07a6-0ff2-4f00-ab5a-89aa7eaf675f" CreationDate="2009-07-16T17:14:34.297" UserDisplayName="Ryan Versaw" Text="I've noticed some alternate tags that should be cleaned up. The first one listed for each of these should be correct (unless I don't know of some other naming convention).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    windows-7&#xD;&#xA;    windows7&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    windows-vista&#xD;&#xA;    windowsvista&#xD;&#xA;    vista&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    windows-xp&#xD;&#xA;    windowsxp&#xD;&#xA;    windows xp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've also noticed an `xbox360` tag - Should this be changed to `xbox-360`?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Edited]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually, it looks like these tags are an issue on all sites (Server Fault &lt;s&gt;&amp; Stack Overflow&lt;/s&gt;)" />
  <row Id="362" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="204" RevisionGUID="4f9f07a6-0ff2-4f00-ab5a-89aa7eaf675f" CreationDate="2009-07-16T17:14:34.297" UserDisplayName="Ryan Versaw" Text="Microsoft related Retagging" />
  <row Id="363" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="204" RevisionGUID="4f9f07a6-0ff2-4f00-ab5a-89aa7eaf675f" CreationDate="2009-07-16T17:14:34.297" UserDisplayName="Ryan Versaw" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="364" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="204" RevisionGUID="447e0c97-396b-48d3-bfa0-b24021c67301" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:46.433" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6195/microsoft-related-retagging" Text="" />
  <row Id="365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="207" RevisionGUID="928b9769-c50f-4e80-bdac-c0f74057db99" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:16:52.563" UserDisplayName="ChrisF" Text="Existing answers aren't changed to CW when the question is. It's up to the OPs to change them - though I think the moderators can go in and change them manually too." />
  <row Id="366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="208" RevisionGUID="5c65a61a-b061-4fac-bdc6-edf298d51b2c" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:16:59.693" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="It's not retro-active. I'm not sure it should be. If you provide an answer that was thoughtful, constructive, and helpful to many other people, you should be allowed to accept up-votes and in turn receive reputation. This should all happen regardless what the OP does with his question." />
  <row Id="367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="209" RevisionGUID="5c6909d4-c432-468c-9524-fb7924a0aecc" CreationDate="2009-07-17T05:56:22.187" Text="As other noted, the only &quot;wiki-hammer&quot; occurs when a question reaches 30 answers and is not already community wiki. At that point the Q and all As are forced into wiki.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus, any poster can opt in to wiki at the time of post, without affecting any other questions or answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(it is not possible to opt out of wiki, ever, though.)" />
  <row Id="368" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="206" RevisionGUID="b136dbd3-bcc1-4eda-b1f2-a29f3953068b" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:14:55.587" UserDisplayName="JP" Text="When the question for my answer [here][1] was changed to CW, I think my answer should have been made CW as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/2109/must-have-games/2123#2123" />
  <row Id="369" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="206" RevisionGUID="b136dbd3-bcc1-4eda-b1f2-a29f3953068b" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:14:55.587" UserDisplayName="JP" Text="Answer should have been changed to wiki" />
  <row Id="370" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="206" RevisionGUID="b136dbd3-bcc1-4eda-b1f2-a29f3953068b" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:14:55.587" UserDisplayName="JP" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;" />
  <row Id="371" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="206" RevisionGUID="4a580779-75bf-4b04-8cfe-7658c5bd43ef" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:46.767" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6216/answer-should-have-been-changed-to-wiki" Text="" />
  <row Id="372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="211" RevisionGUID="6ef3df25-d893-4620-b60d-a0d7e2cbc2a1" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:38:41.067" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="Actually, you have, and then some - according to Jon Skeet's [rep tracker][1], you've gained +215 points since 0:00 UTC.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://csharpindepth.com/StackOverflow/ReputationTracker.aspx?su=2066&amp;mode=today&amp;showzero=true&amp;showflair=true" />
  <row Id="373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="210" RevisionGUID="a74f0ae5-e947-470b-bc2c-7b2b9ba562ff" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:35:59.207" UserDisplayName="Daniel A. White" Text="I only got 5 points on superuser for an upvote. Any ideas? I haven't met my limit yet." />
  <row Id="374" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="210" RevisionGUID="a74f0ae5-e947-470b-bc2c-7b2b9ba562ff" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:35:59.207" UserDisplayName="Daniel A. White" Text="5 points on upvote?" />
  <row Id="375" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="210" RevisionGUID="a74f0ae5-e947-470b-bc2c-7b2b9ba562ff" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:35:59.207" UserDisplayName="Daniel A. White" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="376" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="210" RevisionGUID="9da92fd4-725a-4bf8-a07c-98ddaae85c8c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:47.227" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6228/5-points-on-upvote" Text="" />
  <row Id="377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="213" RevisionGUID="a1e78c6b-d17b-4cb8-a548-c9b83cc96d67" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:48:29.607" UserDisplayName="Jon Skeet" Text="That's probably just someone else downvoting at the same time as you upvoted. When your upvote was in place (arrow highlighted) the two cancelled each other out, leading to a total of 0. When you then undid your vote, it went down to -1.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: In particular, if you mean [Jonathan Sampson's answer][1], he has indeed received a downvote for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/5844/5845#5845" />
  <row Id="378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="214" RevisionGUID="639abe31-aadd-488d-943c-251da82336f7" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:56:13.197" UserDisplayName="gnovice" Text="Jon has it right that someone else probably just downvoted at the same time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, remember that the upvote arrow is like a toggle. Each time you click it it switches states (on or off)." />
  <row Id="379" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="212" RevisionGUID="d2c89e35-469a-4d1d-b060-fcabc4868b2d" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:46:49.513" UserDisplayName="Jeff Leonard" Text="http://superuser.com/questions/5844/criteria-for-rating-lcd-monitor-quality&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the above question, I upvoted a couple of answers with 0 vote count and the count was not incremented, but the uparrow highlighted.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Being confused by this I clicked the upvote again and the count changed to -1.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="380" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="212" RevisionGUID="d2c89e35-469a-4d1d-b060-fcabc4868b2d" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:46:49.513" UserDisplayName="Jeff Leonard" Text="Upvoting an answer on superuser.com not incrementing vote count correctly" />
  <row Id="381" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="212" RevisionGUID="d2c89e35-469a-4d1d-b060-fcabc4868b2d" CreationDate="2009-07-16T18:46:49.513" UserDisplayName="Jeff Leonard" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-norepro&gt;&lt;up-votes&gt;" />
  <row Id="382" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="212" RevisionGUID="cf02a30a-c08f-4141-a54f-075177b763c3" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:47.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6232/upvoting-an-answer-on-superuser-com-not-incrementing-vote-count-correctly" Text="" />
  <row Id="383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="216" RevisionGUID="d83a6742-2fd2-4f8a-a117-06030fb87c54" CreationDate="2009-07-16T19:46:11.657" UserDisplayName="Blixt" Text="Most likely a bug related to the migration of posts. This one, in your case:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/4714/whats-your-favorite-harmless-computer-practical-joke" />
  <row Id="384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="215" RevisionGUID="4fb26a7b-3252-4f42-b3e3-9fb8e6d6b572" CreationDate="2009-07-16T19:42:43.213" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="[A few of us on Super User have won Necromancer.][1] Judging by the number of days SU has been opened, and the days required to qualify a question for Necromancer, I wouldn't think this was possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/badges/17/necromancer" />
  <row Id="385" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="215" RevisionGUID="4fb26a7b-3252-4f42-b3e3-9fb8e6d6b572" CreationDate="2009-07-16T19:42:43.213" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="Superuser: You won 'Necromancer'?" />
  <row Id="386" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="215" RevisionGUID="4fb26a7b-3252-4f42-b3e3-9fb8e6d6b572" CreationDate="2009-07-16T19:42:43.213" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;badges&gt;&lt;necromancer&gt;" />
  <row Id="387" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="215" RevisionGUID="9fb5d2ca-5366-4a2f-9b44-a21ae58a9090" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:47.943" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6253/superuser-you-won-necromancer" Text="" />
  <row Id="388" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="218" RevisionGUID="0007dffb-28d8-4277-846d-4ba33f0f6053" CreationDate="2009-07-16T20:33:35.207" UserDisplayName="Kevin Laity" Text="I think that color is called &quot;radioactive teal&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I think part of it is that the tags are outlined instead of solid colored, it makes them kindof indistinct from the rest of the text." />
  <row Id="389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="219" RevisionGUID="72a882aa-95e4-4d37-88f9-a469d35a084a" CreationDate="2009-07-16T20:42:01.560" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="Meh. I like it. The questions are kinda boring so far, but the colors are nice." />
  <row Id="390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="220" RevisionGUID="fe878f34-a538-43b4-842c-a4e4cd2c7726" CreationDate="2009-07-16T20:55:54.977" UserDisplayName="Paul Nathan" Text="I also do not find the SU color scheme pleasant to the eyes, although I grant you, it's gotten much better." />
  <row Id="391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="221" RevisionGUID="b35108a1-24b9-4815-a643-fdbc30fdd420" CreationDate="2009-07-16T21:31:43.617" UserDisplayName="Kip" Text="Really?  I thought SuperUser had the nicest color scheme of the four." />
  <row Id="392" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="222" RevisionGUID="fa90f163-c8c9-4924-8227-2f0a6954ff8f" CreationDate="2009-07-17T22:20:16.880" UserDisplayName="bobobobo" Text="don't listen to them!  the site looks great!" />
  <row Id="393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="223" RevisionGUID="3a8d6dad-6000-43ef-8988-1ab32130b704" CreationDate="2009-07-21T19:15:40.657" UserDisplayName="richq" Text="The worst offender is the pea-green Accepted Answer background color. The gray arrows and score is really hard to see, the user name has really bad contrast too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here is a link to an accepted answer][1] so you don't have to hunt around to find one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: Looks like the color has been toned down. Nice work!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/2733/is-it-better-to-leave-your-computer-on-all-the-time/2747#2747" />
  <row Id="394" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="224" RevisionGUID="d5220bc6-8390-40db-86db-558005ae3eec" CreationDate="2009-07-21T19:26:00.890" UserDisplayName="spoulson" Text="I don't completely agree that the site is hard to read.  I don't have an issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, blue is the hardest color for the human eye to focus on because there are [less blue cones compared to red/green][1].  This is why blue is often a background color, like in the old school WordPerfect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vision/rodcone.html#c3" />
  <row Id="395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="225" RevisionGUID="d71cb0f2-3e9a-4052-8053-2bdad7cbf828" CreationDate="2009-08-03T23:26:54.927" UserDisplayName="Sam" Text="Superuser burns my eyes.  After 10 seconds, my eyes hurt." />
  <row Id="396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="226" RevisionGUID="8de752ef-5fcc-47f0-95f6-8b883789929c" CreationDate="2009-08-04T14:35:41.690" UserDisplayName="vmarquez" Text="I like SU color scheme." />
  <row Id="397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="228" RevisionGUID="40c6d3ef-62e9-4b02-ac2c-eb40df22b290" CreationDate="2010-02-25T17:10:01.117" UserDisplayName="Michael Kniskern" Text="Superuser should allow the option to choose the Windows 3.1 &quot;Hot dog vendor&quot; color scheme" />
  <row Id="398" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="227" RevisionGUID="5e40325b-2e4e-4cf3-9df3-fa4f78862871" CreationDate="2009-09-30T13:02:36.187" UserDisplayName="mm2010" Text="Time will tell." />
  <row Id="399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="229" RevisionGUID="d8dfa75c-5c20-42f5-8350-ed2042bfeb5b" CreationDate="2010-03-26T21:41:43.420" UserDisplayName="rlb.usa" Text="SuperUser colors are a-okay EXCEPT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - In comments, it is hard to make out `codified` text because both the comment and codified background colors are white.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would this be an acceptable and more-user friendly change?" />
  <row Id="400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="217" RevisionGUID="192edcbe-8f68-4723-96f8-581059a6004b" CreationDate="2009-07-16T20:01:35.693" UserDisplayName="tim" Text="I can't look at that site for too long.  It's not the ewoks or the questions - it is the color scheme.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please make it possible to browse that site for more than a minute or two&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To elaborate - the color scheme is cool, for a logo or some graphic - but IMO it is not a good color scheme to be used for prolonged reading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How many of the  people who like it actually would set those as their colors for their desktop or browser or favorite IDE?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I wouldn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="401" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="217" RevisionGUID="192edcbe-8f68-4723-96f8-581059a6004b" CreationDate="2009-07-16T20:01:35.693" UserDisplayName="tim" Text="Superuser color is really really bothersome and fatiguing" />
  <row Id="402" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="217" RevisionGUID="192edcbe-8f68-4723-96f8-581059a6004b" CreationDate="2009-07-16T20:01:35.693" UserDisplayName="tim" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;color&gt;" />
  <row Id="403" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="217" RevisionGUID="da9c8cbf-15f4-460d-bf36-686ca4044dc5" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:56:48.337" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6335/superuser-color-is-really-really-bothersome-and-fatiguing" Text="" />
  <row Id="404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="231" RevisionGUID="81c9f01a-5dd2-4dbb-84e8-41ad61ee6e18" CreationDate="2009-07-16T20:52:19.857" UserDisplayName="Marc Gravell" Text="The best I can think is: maybe somebody upvoted one of your replies and then revoked it? (after all, a downvote+revoke awards critic...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(the numbers don't support the alternative theory of 1 upvote and 2 downvotes)" />
  <row Id="405" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="231" RevisionGUID="81c9f01a-5dd2-4dbb-84e8-41ad61ee6e18" CreationDate="2009-07-16T20:52:19.857" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="230" RevisionGUID="3e8f03ca-6946-4ed3-8d14-6f53d296f087" CreationDate="2009-07-16T20:47:46.783" UserDisplayName="Stefano Borini" Text="I gave 5 answers on superuser. One has been downvoted, and apparently no other answer has been upvoted, so I currently have only one downvote. Despite this, I've been awarded the &quot;teacher&quot; badge, which is supposed to be granted only when you get upvoted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="407" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="230" RevisionGUID="3e8f03ca-6946-4ed3-8d14-6f53d296f087" CreationDate="2009-07-16T20:47:46.783" UserDisplayName="Stefano Borini" Text="Superuser Bug: &quot;teacher&quot; badge assigned with downvote" />
  <row Id="408" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="230" RevisionGUID="3e8f03ca-6946-4ed3-8d14-6f53d296f087" CreationDate="2009-07-16T20:47:46.783" UserDisplayName="Stefano Borini" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;" />
  <row Id="409" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="230" RevisionGUID="3e8f03ca-6946-4ed3-8d14-6f53d296f087" CreationDate="2009-07-16T20:47:46.783" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="410" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="230" RevisionGUID="5c4c58d2-886b-4c25-84e1-2f021b9eb909" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:30.183" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6358/superuser-bug-teacher-badge-assigned-with-downvote" Text="" />
  <row Id="411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="233" RevisionGUID="c17433e8-244d-4e61-ba14-e21cc5d2844d" CreationDate="2009-07-16T21:56:47.493" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Meta is where we spend a bit of time hashing out what the proper tag conventions are. Once a convention is decided upon, the users and the moderators are expected to try and abide by it. Obviously there are going to be some misses here and there by people who are not as familiar with things as others. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anybody with over 500 rep can retag questions, so it will not be long before a lot of the copy-cat tags start getting whittled down." />
  <row Id="412" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="234" RevisionGUID="519ab830-1a66-4e47-9b53-39d675429356" CreationDate="2009-07-17T01:34:23.127" UserDisplayName="AnonJr" Text="&gt; Why are people making up tags when we have one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get a badge..." />
  <row Id="413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="235" RevisionGUID="1bb7b70a-a929-4bc1-9a4f-e552f975df5f" CreationDate="2010-03-29T06:23:14.433" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Some multis merged:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- multi-platform/multiplatform =&gt; [cross-platform][1]&#xD;&#xA;- multicore/multiple-core  =&gt; [multi-core][2]&#xD;&#xA;- multi-monitor/multi-screen =&gt; [multiple-monitors][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And now thanks to seeing it too often, the word &quot;multi&quot; just looks like it's spelled wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/cross-platform&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/multi-core&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/multiple-monitors" />
  <row Id="414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="236" RevisionGUID="5d6e491c-c9b2-4be9-b0eb-565bb9ef1d7e" CreationDate="2010-03-29T10:41:57.273" UserDisplayName="Arjan" Text="I sometimes wonder if everybody sees the suggestions while typing the tags. What if people type faster than the Ajax suggestion displays? (Or: slow connection, slow computer, something blocking Ajax requests, or no JavaScript at all?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Likewise, I was surprised to learn that some wanted [to make it easier][1] to close questions as duplicates, while for me pasting the full URL is all I need to get some JavaScript magic started right away.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39632/easier-to-close-questions-as-a-duplicate" />
  <row Id="415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="232" RevisionGUID="52c1ecf0-5399-4478-8a34-18acdde4d231" CreationDate="2009-07-16T21:48:51.203" UserDisplayName="tsilb" Text="People are making up new tags to mean the same thing. There needs to be a definitive tag for each meaning.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Search for &quot;multi&quot; in Tags. Find:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [multiple-monitors][1] x12&#xD;&#xA;- [multiscreen][2] x3&#xD;&#xA;- [multi-monitor][3] x2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore I suggest multiple-monitors be the de facto standard and someone with sufficient rep retag the others. Let's nip this thing in the bud before it gets to be a problem on ALL stackware websites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because this has to be a question:  Why are people making up tags when we have one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This goes for other areas as well. I'm sure this is more prevalent than I realize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW I suggest adding this to sufaq-official tag, but not sure if &quot;official&quot; implies a process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/multiple-monitors&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/multiscreen&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/multi-monitor" />
  <row Id="416" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="232" RevisionGUID="52c1ecf0-5399-4478-8a34-18acdde4d231" CreationDate="2009-07-16T21:48:51.203" UserDisplayName="tsilb" Text="Why are people making up tags when we have one?" />
  <row Id="417" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="232" RevisionGUID="52c1ecf0-5399-4478-8a34-18acdde4d231" CreationDate="2009-07-16T21:48:51.203" UserDisplayName="tsilb" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="418" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="232" RevisionGUID="8c9d20f3-e0b2-4402-8aea-026efdc2eaf6" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:30.750" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6386/why-are-people-making-up-tags-when-we-have-one" Text="" />
  <row Id="419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="238" RevisionGUID="5dd3ccb9-2b28-4afb-9ed4-e71d21f02489" CreationDate="2009-07-17T01:12:54.157" UserDisplayName="Paolo Bergantino" Text="The question you answered is community wiki, you don't get reputation points for those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Read the [FAQ question](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/128434/what-are-community-wiki-posts-on-stack-overflow) on community wiki for more." />
  <row Id="420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="237" RevisionGUID="f9f293f7-6f80-4c06-8340-023bd4323064" CreationDate="2009-07-17T01:06:44.853" UserDisplayName="SqlACID" Text="My rep on [superuser ][1]shows 101, yet I have 11 upvotes, should it not be 110? Is there a delay before it shows up? I have not noticed the same on SO or SF.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/2345/cdenker" />
  <row Id="421" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="237" RevisionGUID="f9f293f7-6f80-4c06-8340-023bd4323064" CreationDate="2009-07-17T01:06:44.853" UserDisplayName="SqlACID" Text="rep points not working?" />
  <row Id="422" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="237" RevisionGUID="f9f293f7-6f80-4c06-8340-023bd4323064" CreationDate="2009-07-17T01:06:44.853" UserDisplayName="SqlACID" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="423" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="237" RevisionGUID="a9eb1cc9-dc71-457e-968c-a096953d2328" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:31.830" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6415/rep-points-not-working" Text="" />
  <row Id="424" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="240" RevisionGUID="9203b702-89fe-4624-8aa7-bcaba64c291d" CreationDate="2009-07-17T09:58:01.233" UserDisplayName="ChrisF" Text="I was just wondering whether there should be mandatory tags on the other sites too, but couldn't even come close to a list of possibilities. Not sure &lt;kbd&gt;hardware&lt;/kbd&gt; and &lt;kbd&gt;software&lt;/kbd&gt; are necessarily the way to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But they are a good starting point for the discussion though." />
  <row Id="425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="241" RevisionGUID="62deafe6-198b-48a1-a289-997300b3393a" CreationDate="2009-07-17T10:04:59.360" UserDisplayName="Jon Skeet" Text="I'm not sure that all questions should fall into one of these categories. For instance, a question which asks the best way of achieving some goal may be answered with a hardware solution or a software solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At other times it could be unknown (e.g. &quot;I don't know why X doesn't work&quot; when it could be drivers or the hardware). In other cases it could be both (&quot;Why is Safari on the iPhone slow?&quot;.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More importantly, what value would it really add? Is anyone going to search for only software questions or only hardware questions? In most hardware situations there'll be *some* overlap anyway - if you're asking about recommended graphics cards, then the driver quality (software) will be relevant to that decision anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm afraid I just don't see a problem there to be solved." />
  <row Id="426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="242" RevisionGUID="3eabe749-4e88-459f-8022-e37a6f0f09a2" CreationDate="2009-07-17T11:15:39.440" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="I think the hardware and software tags can be important in giving a broad view of the scope of a question, but I certainly don't think they should be prereq. For one, the fact that they are *that* broad makes them not the most helpful tag for people to subscribe to (unless you want to get a huge list of interesting questions). I also think that if you have a question which ends up needing a lot of tags to scope out, using a very broad tag might take up one of your allowed tags that would have been better used on something with more specificity." />
  <row Id="427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="239" RevisionGUID="b3bc99ef-a5fd-417b-9c06-343d53866e53" CreationDate="2009-07-17T09:53:53.603" UserDisplayName="geocoin" Text="should questions on SU have a tag prerequisite for being either hardware or software, as all questions *in theory* should fall into at least one or other of those categories? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;quite a few Q's are missing what is probably one of the most important tags on the site...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;just a thought. (and as i've just discovered, the mechanism is there as meta forces one of 4 - bug, feature-request, discussion and support" />
  <row Id="428" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="239" RevisionGUID="b3bc99ef-a5fd-417b-9c06-343d53866e53" CreationDate="2009-07-17T09:53:53.603" UserDisplayName="geocoin" Text="superuser tag prerequisites " />
  <row Id="429" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="239" RevisionGUID="b3bc99ef-a5fd-417b-9c06-343d53866e53" CreationDate="2009-07-17T09:53:53.603" UserDisplayName="geocoin" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="430" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="239" RevisionGUID="6a9c81f2-4cee-45f3-af7e-929840640879" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:32.030" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6477/superuser-tag-prerequisites" Text="" />
  <row Id="431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="244" RevisionGUID="93d5deed-c071-4f44-a0dc-e5a7074f3725" CreationDate="2009-07-17T14:04:07.853" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="There is quite a few already, and as long as it is PC or Console based I see no reason why they can't be posted. I know there was a thread on the PS/3 on the first day already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it does not meet the criteria of the site on a per question basis it will quickly be voted to close either way." />
  <row Id="432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="245" RevisionGUID="b6e26024-8c93-4346-baf2-f458ed8229f9" CreationDate="2009-07-17T14:07:06.067" UserDisplayName="ChrisF" Text="&lt;strike&gt;The [about page][1] on SuperUser states (as it's very first line):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is a Q&amp;A site for computer enthusiasts that's free&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'd assume that questions about games and games consoles are allowed. After all what are consoles but computers?&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This answer is now irrelevant due to recent changes to the [SuperUser faq][2] that banned console and computer game questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/about&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/faq" />
  <row Id="433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="246" RevisionGUID="2396a1d8-92ae-4d53-8a79-d450eab7bd64" CreationDate="2009-07-17T14:08:33.410" UserDisplayName="devinb" Text="Quite frankly, I'd say no. There are millions of sites devoted to video games, and super-user is devoted to tips-and-tricks for using your computer, not (IMO) how to pass level four in... DROD." />
  <row Id="434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="247" RevisionGUID="fcef1a36-6a3d-4492-b88e-f25bd6c6f410" CreationDate="2009-07-19T12:39:20.190" UserDisplayName="jammus" Text="Jeff has just been through and closed a bunch of PS3/Xbox related questions, so it seems the answer is 'no'." />
  <row Id="435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="248" RevisionGUID="a1ca4d42-a2ee-4b3c-8c6b-7ef57e50bf23" CreationDate="2009-07-19T12:45:52.770" UserDisplayName="Bruce McLeod" Text="I think that the answer should be NO, as if you allow PS3 you have to allow Xbox and Wii. Then  to be fair you have to allow discussion on PSP, and Nintendo DS and iPhone games, and it then becomes a very slippery slope." />
  <row Id="436" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="249" RevisionGUID="1110af7f-46d6-4601-93ec-24861e170353" CreationDate="2009-07-19T12:47:04.213" Text="**The official stance is now that videogame questions are not allowed on Super User.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. console gaming questions are not allowed (no computer involved)&#xD;&#xA;2. pc/mac purely gaming questions are not allowed&#xD;&#xA;3. pc/mac *peripherally* gaming related questions *may* be allowed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example of #3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;I am having trouble getting my router configured to let my home PC share videos to my Xbox (allowable because a regular home PC is involved)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: SU FAQ updated, close reason &quot;purely videogame or console gaming related&quot; added&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="250" RevisionGUID="e85e7d4b-8761-45be-8820-f21a877df681" CreationDate="2009-09-03T08:51:18.060" UserDisplayName="NoCanDo" Text="I'm going ask here, since my other question was deemed, after 12 revisions of twisting and turning my question all around, not representing my original intended question anymore, a duplicate (duh!).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How are video games not software? As far as I know Superuser is about software and hardware related questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Surely you realize that video games ARE software with intent to entertain. I fail to grasp the logic behind the exclusion of video games from superuser." />
  <row Id="438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="251" RevisionGUID="693e04a8-6c22-4ae9-9e62-f8d0f3b404ad" CreationDate="2009-09-05T23:11:01.377" UserDisplayName="7777" Text="&gt; Or is it time to create another site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In answer to this question, I think this thread has shown a terrific reason to have a gaming branch of the Stack Overflow group of sites.  Gaming questions shouldn't be on Superuser at all, I agree, it's just way too specific.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if there are so many people who need a place to ask gaming-related questions and if there is no other forum for gamers on the internet that isn't laughably rude or unhelpful, I can't think of any bunch of people better than the Superuser et al userbase to answer questions in a mature and helpful manner." />
  <row Id="439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="252" RevisionGUID="564024db-2066-4889-95f3-2de64612589e" CreationDate="2009-10-06T13:48:33.093" UserDisplayName="cowgod" Text="[GameLegend][1], a new Stack Exchange site devoted to gaming, is coming soon.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]:http://gamelegend.com" />
  <row Id="440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="253" RevisionGUID="be613b96-ed00-4022-a1ce-d53618714918" CreationDate="2009-10-06T13:57:15.167" UserDisplayName="David Thornley" Text="Go to a video game site, and look at what's available, and the questions that are asked.  The questions are typically either noise or how to play the game better.  There is no purpose other than to play the game.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, look at S[OFU].  The questions are typically on how to accomplish something.  What &quot;something&quot; is varies widely, and the method of accomplishment does, but questions are normally task-oriented.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That, I think, is the basic difference.  So, I'd be happy with questions on programming games in SO, setting up game servers in SF, or configuring a system in SU, but not questions on how to beat the second gym leader in Pokemon Platinum." />
  <row Id="441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="243" RevisionGUID="7147caed-cb33-492b-b125-b394e8c1d8b9" CreationDate="2009-07-17T14:00:28.090" UserDisplayName="bpapa" Text="Or is it time to create another site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;questions could be general discussion or tips/tricks" />
  <row Id="442" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="243" RevisionGUID="7147caed-cb33-492b-b125-b394e8c1d8b9" CreationDate="2009-07-17T14:00:28.090" UserDisplayName="bpapa" Text="Are video game questions appropriate for superuser?" />
  <row Id="443" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="243" RevisionGUID="7147caed-cb33-492b-b125-b394e8c1d8b9" CreationDate="2009-07-17T14:00:28.090" UserDisplayName="bpapa" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;faq&gt;&lt;video-games&gt;" />
  <row Id="444" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="243" RevisionGUID="c66d722a-9a89-4cf7-b815-6a7b0cad1be2" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:32.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6542/are-video-game-questions-appropriate-for-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="255" RevisionGUID="20b0ac0f-57b8-4007-abfa-5b853ae15cbb" CreationDate="2009-07-17T15:02:00.910" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="The post must have been flagged as either offensive or spam 5 times. This triggers an automatic lock and delete, as well as an instant loss of 100 rep for the poster. However, I'm not sure why this particular one was removed, nor why TheTXI decided to restore it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**edit:** for further information on the flagging system, [see the faq][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/135685/how-does-the-offensive-flag-work-in-stackoverflow" />
  <row Id="446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="256" RevisionGUID="d0aa927d-0119-4cf7-92e4-33c946263d07" CreationDate="2009-07-17T15:06:14.827" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="6 votes (I am almost sure of this) from the community to Spam or 6 votes to Offensive will cause it to automatically delete and dock the poster 100 rep. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can also be triggered automatically by the moderator with a single flag (I just did this on a spam post on SuperUser). It will also cause the penalty (which I was slightly surprised to find out, but not unhappy)." />
  <row Id="447" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="257" RevisionGUID="100b1fc3-41bd-4fda-823d-6be7ee509fa7" CreationDate="2009-07-17T15:16:51.257" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="To answer your question, the post is not spam. I would suggest that you e-mail the stackoverflow team and see if something can be done about the rep loss." />
  <row Id="448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="258" RevisionGUID="1b93f43f-41ef-4896-8839-4c9bac4454b8" CreationDate="2009-07-17T17:11:48.690" Text="Well, TheTXI (accidentally?) flagged it as offensive, and since he's a moderator, that's a binding vote, so it was immediately moved to the offensive/spam threshold, auto-deleted, and incurring -100 to the owning user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(it also had two spam votes prior to this, by two different users -- I'm not seeing what is so spammy / offensive about this post, personally..)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll try to manipulate the database and fix the -100." />
  <row Id="449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="254" RevisionGUID="7bce64c0-4910-432f-a95c-1cc978836d5e" CreationDate="2009-07-17T14:59:23.757" UserDisplayName="spinodal" Text="[This question][1] on su got -100 reputation and I don't know why. In its revision history &quot;Community&quot; named user (I think it is a robot :) ) deleted and locked the question. Maybe this is the reason but question then undeleted and unlocked. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a reason why I got -100 rep? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to see the reason?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rep is not the problem I wonder why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/6925/best-image-viewers-for-windows" />
  <row Id="450" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="254" RevisionGUID="7bce64c0-4910-432f-a95c-1cc978836d5e" CreationDate="2009-07-17T14:59:23.757" UserDisplayName="spinodal" Text="What could be the reason of a negative reputation? " />
  <row Id="451" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="254" RevisionGUID="7bce64c0-4910-432f-a95c-1cc978836d5e" CreationDate="2009-07-17T14:59:23.757" UserDisplayName="spinodal" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="452" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="254" RevisionGUID="25323f69-0cd6-476a-8040-9d30717eabaf" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:35.287" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6570/what-could-be-the-reason-of-a-negative-reputation" Text="" />
  <row Id="453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="260" RevisionGUID="7462f284-b5ff-43f3-a528-17cded8c74a3" CreationDate="2009-07-17T19:11:36.577" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Sorry JS, I think your alone on this one. Did you maybe break something with one of those awesome scripts of yours?" />
  <row Id="454" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="260" RevisionGUID="7462f284-b5ff-43f3-a528-17cded8c74a3" CreationDate="2009-07-17T19:11:36.577" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="455" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="261" RevisionGUID="e7bc5772-7446-4b1f-8492-6f5906b9788a" CreationDate="2009-07-17T19:19:15.323" UserDisplayName="Paolo Bergantino" Text="I think you're probably experiencing what [this user](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/832/firefox-trouble) had. Just hard refresh and it should be fixed." />
  <row Id="456" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="261" RevisionGUID="e7bc5772-7446-4b1f-8492-6f5906b9788a" CreationDate="2009-07-17T19:19:15.323" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="457" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="262" RevisionGUID="64ed2cc4-02d1-4bfa-9a8d-c3f7f829c3e8" CreationDate="2009-07-17T19:33:31.850" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="I think I had accidentally set something in a site-preference. Deleting browsing history fixed it...very strange." />
  <row Id="458" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="262" RevisionGUID="64ed2cc4-02d1-4bfa-9a8d-c3f7f829c3e8" CreationDate="2009-07-17T19:33:31.850" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="259" RevisionGUID="79d2e8f6-f34a-4649-b314-878343c0dba6" CreationDate="2009-07-17T19:03:53.387" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="Is anybody else experiencing no-javascript on Super user?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No ability to add comments. No ability to see live-preview of markdown. No ability to run any jQuery code from Greasemonkey..." />
  <row Id="460" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="259" RevisionGUID="79d2e8f6-f34a-4649-b314-878343c0dba6" CreationDate="2009-07-17T19:03:53.387" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="Javascript on Superuser..." />
  <row Id="461" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="259" RevisionGUID="79d2e8f6-f34a-4649-b314-878343c0dba6" CreationDate="2009-07-17T19:03:53.387" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-norepro&gt;" />
  <row Id="462" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="259" RevisionGUID="79d2e8f6-f34a-4649-b314-878343c0dba6" CreationDate="2009-07-17T19:03:53.387" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="463" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="259" RevisionGUID="dc1a5089-1693-4886-b78b-72a2deb7a38d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:37.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6674/javascript-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="264" RevisionGUID="9506488c-16dc-4f87-aa6b-c451980888c6" CreationDate="2009-07-17T20:36:56.993" UserDisplayName="AlbertoPL" Text="No, I don't think it should. You can't get upvote reputation for your answer, why should you be able to get a bounty for something that is likely to be subjective?" />
  <row Id="465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="265" RevisionGUID="517303ec-cd46-4fca-ab54-04f611425f8b" CreationDate="2009-07-17T20:45:50.157" UserDisplayName="devinb" Text="Of course it should. The OP is still looking for an answer, and they've staked their own rep to find one. This is basically a cash transaction." />
  <row Id="466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="267" RevisionGUID="e4e0b828-cbaf-4e33-8ee2-726bcb9478f9" CreationDate="2009-07-18T04:22:22.797" Text="The bounty does not care whether the question is CW or not and will be awarded if it meets the rules.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;normal&quot; votes on the answers are subject to regular CW rules." />
  <row Id="467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="266" RevisionGUID="89ffb695-d554-47d6-ace0-bac0d9038627" CreationDate="2009-07-17T20:47:07.760" UserDisplayName="Gavin Miller" Text="In the case of [this question][1] the OP accidentally hit CW.  The question resulted in some good answers not getting any rep.  I think the answers still deserved the rep from the bounty given the technical nature of the question (although I am biased...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/266244/unified-way-to-scrape-html-from-any-type-of-browser-process/484312#484312" />
  <row Id="468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="263" RevisionGUID="18b4d3e3-9c73-4163-aa81-4f7b1f70a77a" CreationDate="2009-07-17T20:33:28.943" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="On [this](http://superuser.com/questions/1653/what-does-your-super-awesome-desktop-look-like-screenshots) question the OP opened a bounty, however the question is Community Wiki. Should bounty's still apply to these questions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Edit&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;To clarify I am trying to determine if the bounty will actually be allocated for a Community Wiki questions which does not allow reputation gain." />
  <row Id="469" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="263" RevisionGUID="18b4d3e3-9c73-4163-aa81-4f7b1f70a77a" CreationDate="2009-07-17T20:33:28.943" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Does bounty apply to a CW question?" />
  <row Id="470" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="263" RevisionGUID="18b4d3e3-9c73-4163-aa81-4f7b1f70a77a" CreationDate="2009-07-17T20:33:28.943" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;bounty&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="471" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="263" RevisionGUID="31f0c4bf-7ff6-49ce-8247-64c76d2710d6" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:38.140" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6710/does-bounty-apply-to-a-cw-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="269" RevisionGUID="bb064d29-6755-49f5-bef3-c3fa8f1fe1ef" CreationDate="2009-07-17T21:30:06.707" UserDisplayName="Timothy Carter" Text="It takes the same thing as it does on the other sites, getting upvotes on non-community wiki questions and/or answers. As for why rep doesn't span all the sites, there's been a few [questions][1] on here about that you can look at.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6336" />
  <row Id="473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="270" RevisionGUID="9074a2b1-feda-4e40-b3c1-f357839af0b5" CreationDate="2009-07-17T21:31:28.297" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="Persistence. Dedication. It's been two days and several of us have reached 700-800 points. You've got to go psycho on the system, man :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Think of things you already know - organizing firefox bookmarks, for example. Ask a question, &quot;How exactly do I better organize my firefox bookmarks?&quot; And then answer your own question. If others like your answer, you'll get up-voted. Maybe they'll up-vote the question itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you know simple questions, ask them, and answer them. Somebody else will eventually come across them and benefit from your efforts." />
  <row Id="474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="271" RevisionGUID="fd31a29d-39f4-4613-b271-adecebca2fd9" CreationDate="2009-07-17T21:32:36.163" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="You gain reputation by having answers accepted and by having your questions upvoted. Looking at your history you've only asked 2 questions and posted 2 answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The answers where on Community Wiki posts which is why you have not had any rep gained. However it does take time and hard work. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Click on the Users tab and have a look at the history of the top posters and it would give you an idea how they are able to do it successfully." />
  <row Id="475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="272" RevisionGUID="486960fe-c9b4-405d-9428-7ba7885b16e3" CreationDate="2009-07-17T21:33:51.890" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="The biggest problem is that there is a mass of questions which are just &quot;What is you favorite&quot; or &quot;must have&quot; questions that have no real answer, and therefore fit under a Community Wiki (and therefore no reputation gain/loss) status. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once these questions die down and people actually start posting real questions and answers, then more rep is going to start moving." />
  <row Id="476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="273" RevisionGUID="751080f3-f07b-4494-997f-77e9e741b876" CreationDate="2009-07-17T22:01:33.757" UserDisplayName="jeffm" Text="If you link your Stack Overflow, Server Fault and Super User accounts on the &quot;accounts&quot; tab on your profile page, you'll get a one-time +100 rep bonus for each link." />
  <row Id="477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="268" RevisionGUID="3b447855-cb77-4019-af5c-74dc9829c4c2" CreationDate="2009-07-17T21:25:36.733" UserDisplayName="paul" Text="I've asked a couple of questions.  I've answered a couple.  But my rep is still at 1.  What gives?  I'd like to start commenting and up voting.  And why doesn't rep span all the sites?" />
  <row Id="478" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="268" RevisionGUID="3b447855-cb77-4019-af5c-74dc9829c4c2" CreationDate="2009-07-17T21:25:36.733" UserDisplayName="paul" Text="What does it take to gain reputation on superuser.com?" />
  <row Id="479" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="268" RevisionGUID="3b447855-cb77-4019-af5c-74dc9829c4c2" CreationDate="2009-07-17T21:25:36.733" UserDisplayName="paul" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;support&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="480" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="268" RevisionGUID="ea156ad0-a7f0-4e7b-9f93-54c6ce848c41" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:38.880" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6736/what-does-it-take-to-gain-reputation-on-superuser-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="275" RevisionGUID="0b2cf013-44d2-4165-9e80-7a357be8dd0d" CreationDate="2009-07-18T05:35:04.960" UserDisplayName="Timothy Carter" Text="I definitely think this is a good and needed idea; there are an overwhelming number of subjective questions that should be CW being asked right now. So, I think changing this, at least for now, is a excellent plan. Perhaps it should be revisited in the future and put back to 30 if deemed necessary, but in these early days it definitely seems necessary to me." />
  <row Id="482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="276" RevisionGUID="42f8e423-7cc4-4a2b-b4df-99421ec97f6c" CreationDate="2009-07-18T05:35:51.913" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Personally I never quite understood the logic behind forcing something to community wiki after X amount of posts. I understood the rule on edits, but not on answers. I can see why it would be a useful mechanism at dropping &quot;popular&quot; topics quickly, but at the same time I wonder if the end justifies the means (and whether it will adversely affect legit non-CW questions).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I honestly think it would be better if we had a definite rule in place concerning these types of posts, that way it would send a clear signal to the users to the types of posts should be CW. That way when more people are sure about what action to take, they can flag it immediately for mod attention and we can take care of it that much faster.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: gnovice's comment at the top about possible vote-to-wiki actually sounds like a better solution (not great, but better)." />
  <row Id="483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="277" RevisionGUID="cd542c06-579b-4d26-8d23-8ec58ee49c13" CreationDate="2009-07-18T06:00:52.257" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="Good plan - give it a shot. If it works out, you should do this on SO as well..." />
  <row Id="484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="278" RevisionGUID="5f026f8c-6024-4165-87d0-ffbc122c01c6" CreationDate="2009-07-18T23:47:02.550" UserDisplayName="richardhoskins" Text="I'm all for some general mechanism that discourages questions that lead to never ending discussions, but ten answers is not a good indicator of that type of question.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Consider my question: http://superuser.com/questions/8077/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is a specific question with a specific answer that I think is the type of question that should be encouraged.  Yet, it is community-wiki because of wrong or incomplete answers." />
  <row Id="485" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="280" RevisionGUID="f3f92d8a-a2c2-4890-a144-343bec3c1a2c" CreationDate="2009-07-19T08:43:46.910" UserDisplayName="Joe Schmoe" Text="I really like this idea. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No matter how much you prod and poke users through verbal text that &quot;this or that&quot; should not be done on the site, there will always be those who either ignore those guidelines deliberately and maliciously, or simply through not reading the instructions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There has to be some kind of enforcement to backup the verbal requests. Unless you have moderators reading **every single question all day long**, it will have to be done through some kind of automated mechanism.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As Jeff implies, a specific, focused question really can't have a vast number of different answers, so I like this approach.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the worst case, it means that people don't gain reputation (any further) from answering the question. I don't think that is such a painful thing to trade off against the long term value of the site. It doesn't even stop people answering the question unlike &quot;closing&quot; the question would.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if the question asker gets 10+ answers to a question, then they are probably going to be reasonably happy anyway. Sure, you could get groups that collude maliciously to wikify questions on purpose, but it should become reasonably obvious when this happening and this is where the moderators will need to step in to take manual action against those users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think SuperUser in it's generality more closely approximates what a StackExchange site on a non-technical subject might be like - which I am interested in. So I am keen for some kind of automatic rule enforcement to prevent any future StackExchange site degenerating into a free-for-all when exposed to the wilder and darker sides of the net." />
  <row Id="486" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="281" RevisionGUID="853e6125-b679-43f5-bde2-4db0d881d56b" CreationDate="2009-07-19T09:36:28.237" UserDisplayName="Damien" Text="I don't like this idea because it could simply be a challenging question in which a lot of people post different answers. What your trying to do to detect the subjective questions to try and prevent vote-harvesting but I really think that answer count is a poor way to do it, getting the community to do so is a better option. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another way is to try and condition people to make a subjective question as wiki. That’s what I do when I ask a Wiki question and people should make better use of down votes to enforce this behavior. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After all, if it’s unfair for user to get rep via a community wiki question then they should get none. Why does someone who doesn’t make their question as Wiki get 100 rep when those of us who do get 0. &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="282" RevisionGUID="5e740a38-cfde-4660-b358-7a093155c5e2" CreationDate="2009-07-22T10:56:31.713" UserDisplayName="Arjan" Text="If the crew feels the need to reduce these kind of questions (and I agree), then why not adjust the rules and state they're unwanted? And hence close them?" />
  <row Id="488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="279" RevisionGUID="61915194-1aa9-4085-bc6e-e9c30c79c5c5" CreationDate="2009-07-19T07:20:59.463" UserDisplayName="kd304" Text="That's dangerous, a malicious group of users could turn almost every post to wiki this way and not even pay the downvote penalties for inadequate answers. Don't automate such non-undoable change based on arbitrary constraints, instead, have a moderator's attention if the answers get above a certain threshold - unless you can provide an AI to make decision based on the contents. Use the power of the community!" />
  <row Id="489" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="283" RevisionGUID="473a921a-0086-4952-a992-2830e8c1b3b7" CreationDate="2009-07-29T02:08:28.203" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="I don't see how the number of answers defines a question as being &quot;wiki.&quot; Is that what a wiki is? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The idea of tying two unrelated pieces of functionality together feels like a &quot;code smell,&quot; at least in a system design sense. It seems like an attempt to automate away some basic, human functions of site moderation. I feel a similar &quot;uneasiness&quot; about turning questions into wikis because of multiple edits. It ties two pieces of functionality together that are unrelated and the wrong solution to the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Either a question is a wiki or it isn't. But it's a subjective decision, not &quot;automate-able.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the original poster got it wrong, that's what moderators (or the community) are for. I have a bad feeling that if you try automating the whole process through a mish-mash of algorithms and constraints and database queries, it's going to become a unmaintainable mess and nobodies going to &quot;get it.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't the same thing as tweaking up/down-vote reputation weights to bring balance to the system. This is the basic definitions of what should, and what should not, be on the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Random thoughts section: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Have a clear statement of what Wikis are for coupled with a clear statement of what kind of questions should (and should not) be on the site (*not* wikis, but closed outright).&#xD;&#xA; - Possibly a &quot;needs to be wiki&quot; function when flagging a post.&#xD;&#xA; - If technically possible, a way to reverse a wiki (back to a question) if someone got it wrong. Then &quot;vote to wiki&quot; could be handled *identically* as &quot;vote to close.&quot;&#xD;&#xA; - Do we need wikis at all (definitely a random thought). For those *rare* cases where they work, we're back to &quot;capping max reputation per question.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think wiki should be *rare*, anyway." />
  <row Id="490" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="274" RevisionGUID="5facae6e-b12b-47dd-9582-957c489a8139" CreationDate="2009-07-18T05:28:06.997" Text="We are picking up *tons* of subjective posts on superuser.com so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One way to mitigate this is to reduce the community wiki force threshold from **30 answers** (as it is on SO, SF, and here) to **15 answers** -- or maybe even **10 answers**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any votes received prior to the 15th answer arriving are still counted, but once that 15th answer is posted, the question and all answers are forced into community wiki mode.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Goal: reduce incentive to post umpteen zillion &amp;hellip;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What Are Your &quot;Must Have&quot; Thingamajigs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&amp;hellip; questions. They will almost immediately get 15 answers and thus, produce minimal rep gain from asking ultra-subjective, no-specific-answer questions like this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts? Opinions? Feelings? Tyrannosaurus Rex?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###edit&#xD;&#xA;based on feedback so far, I am setting the communiy wiki threshold to **15 answers** on superuser.com for now" />
  <row Id="491" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="274" RevisionGUID="5facae6e-b12b-47dd-9582-957c489a8139" CreationDate="2009-07-18T05:28:06.997" Text="Reduce community wiki force threshold to &lt;= 15 answers on superuser?" />
  <row Id="492" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="274" RevisionGUID="5facae6e-b12b-47dd-9582-957c489a8139" CreationDate="2009-07-18T05:28:06.997" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="493" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="274" RevisionGUID="86c38bdb-dbdc-43db-ae2d-b724b23005fe" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:39.870" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6814/reduce-community-wiki-force-threshold-to-15-answers-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="287" RevisionGUID="255b1f75-5754-48ef-8271-991966fea782" CreationDate="2009-07-18T17:04:28.637" UserDisplayName="Ian Elliott" Text="You're right, the `Grant Access` button doesn't actually do anything, and even in a real browser it doesn't have a cursor change which is quite annoying. However, you *can* still login by pressing enter in the password field -- I just tried :)" />
  <row Id="500" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="286" RevisionGUID="242479e8-da8a-47e5-8dec-3333dc30b2c5" CreationDate="2009-07-18T07:01:57.007" UserDisplayName="Soldier.moth" Text="While this only matters for a couple of weeks, it seems impossible to visit superuser.com as it won't go process the beta entrance code." />
  <row Id="501" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="286" RevisionGUID="242479e8-da8a-47e5-8dec-3333dc30b2c5" CreationDate="2009-07-18T07:01:57.007" UserDisplayName="Soldier.moth" Text="Can't get past beta password screen from Blackberry" />
  <row Id="502" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="286" RevisionGUID="242479e8-da8a-47e5-8dec-3333dc30b2c5" CreationDate="2009-07-18T07:01:57.007" UserDisplayName="Soldier.moth" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-declined&gt;&lt;private-beta&gt;&lt;blackberry&gt;" />
  <row Id="503" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="286" RevisionGUID="3589445b-56ce-4003-9663-1260ef397ece" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:42.580" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6831/cant-get-past-beta-password-screen-from-blackberry" Text="" />
  <row Id="504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="289" RevisionGUID="5f4287ed-e358-4231-86bd-b1d77db96b86" CreationDate="2009-07-18T14:11:46.550" Text="Doubtful -- part of the reason we want to use our own engine is that &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- there was *some* overlap with UserVoice&#xD;&#xA;- a sizable contingent of our users actively hated UserVoice&#xD;&#xA;- our engine can plausibly do what UserVoice does, mostly, with some tweaks&#xD;&#xA;- users seem to like our engine, and they obviously know it already&#xD;&#xA;- it's a TON faster than UserVoice, which was &lt;s&gt;always&lt;/s&gt;frequently aggravatingly slow (hello Ruby app!)" />
  <row Id="505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="288" RevisionGUID="2f0ccba5-fb04-4a42-a45e-57d322e3fc2f" CreationDate="2009-07-18T10:12:46.930" UserDisplayName="ripper234" Text="Is it better for a 3rd party website to choose StackOverflow engine for user feedback instead of something like [UserVoice][1]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Price is a consideration, but I'm interested mostly in how they compare feature-wise. Remember, part of the reason Meta is good as a feedback for SO is because they share the same design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://uservoice.com" />
  <row Id="506" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="288" RevisionGUID="2f0ccba5-fb04-4a42-a45e-57d322e3fc2f" CreationDate="2009-07-18T10:12:46.930" UserDisplayName="ripper234" Text="Is meta.stackoverflow's engine a competitor for uservoice for 3rd party sites?" />
  <row Id="507" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="288" RevisionGUID="2f0ccba5-fb04-4a42-a45e-57d322e3fc2f" CreationDate="2009-07-18T10:12:46.930" UserDisplayName="ripper234" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;feedback&gt;" />
  <row Id="508" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="288" RevisionGUID="96693918-1e19-4fa0-94f8-87e47c0fc410" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:42.903" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6843/is-meta-stackoverflows-engine-a-competitor-for-uservoice-for-3rd-party-sites" Text="" />
  <row Id="509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="291" RevisionGUID="5ee91561-f154-4142-86f1-8afd91bc4a60" CreationDate="2009-07-18T18:35:50.257" UserDisplayName="Ian Elliott" Text="It's definitely working for me, perhaps try direct [link][1]?  &#xD;&#xA;I don't see how this could be browser/OS specific as the info comes from the server. Otherwise I would argue that it *is* a cache problem. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/unanswered/tagged?page=1&amp;tab=votes&amp;pagesize=50" />
  <row Id="510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="290" RevisionGUID="070060d3-fbe7-460e-af15-2da7ffb84d6e" CreationDate="2009-07-18T18:29:10.893" UserDisplayName="Ladybug Killer" Text="I wanted to show 50 items per page in the *Unanswered Questions* page (default: 15).  &#xD;&#xA;After clicking the corresponding button, no questions are shown (blank left column). Same with the button for showing 30 questions. &lt;strike&gt;This works on the other three sites.&lt;/strike&gt; (See Edit 2. Now it's reproducible on all sites)  &#xD;&#xA;It's not a caching problem.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using Firefox 3.0 and Vista 64bit  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;**Edit**  &#xD;&#xA;Ian Elliott's link is working:  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/unanswered/tagged?page=1&amp;tab=votes&amp;pagesize=50  &#xD;&#xA;That's the link generated on my request:  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/unanswered/tagged?page=12&amp;tab=votes&amp;pagesize=50  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;There is page=12, not page=1 for some reason.  &#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;**Edit 2**  &#xD;&#xA;Now I understand the bug:  &#xD;&#xA;With show=15 I was on the 12th page (*go to page x* on the lower left). Here I changed the list to 50 items per page. Because a 12th page does not exits when 50 items are listed, I get no questions listed at all." />
  <row Id="511" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="290" RevisionGUID="070060d3-fbe7-460e-af15-2da7ffb84d6e" CreationDate="2009-07-18T18:29:10.893" UserDisplayName="Ladybug Killer" Text="Increasing &quot;show x items per page&quot; does not working on SuperUser" />
  <row Id="512" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="290" RevisionGUID="070060d3-fbe7-460e-af15-2da7ffb84d6e" CreationDate="2009-07-18T18:29:10.893" UserDisplayName="Ladybug Killer" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;items-per-page&gt;" />
  <row Id="513" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="290" RevisionGUID="7530dc23-74e6-47f3-ac07-aa955fe11ee0" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:43.160" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6908/increasing-show-x-items-per-page-does-not-working-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="514" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="293" RevisionGUID="e70c0221-d87e-4e9d-a854-9e0167055f89" CreationDate="2009-07-18T22:57:28.020" UserDisplayName="kd304" Text="Are you sure you didn't accidentally checked the box? I don't see any edits to the question." />
  <row Id="515" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="294" RevisionGUID="6c49508d-4663-4dee-a13d-c0e839027bdf" CreationDate="2009-07-18T22:58:59.167" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="Your question has 10 answers. Any question on SuperUser with 10 or more answers is [automatically converted to Community Wiki][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6814/reduce-community-wiki-force-threshold-to-15-answers-on-superuser" />
  <row Id="516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="292" RevisionGUID="506c71a6-2d9d-4862-bb8a-796f28240313" CreationDate="2009-07-18T22:55:06.337" UserDisplayName="richardhoskins" Text="http://superuser.com/questions/8077/how-do-i-set-up-ssh-so-i-dont-have-to-type-my-password&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a specific question with a specific answer.  I thought community-wiki was a ghetto for &quot;Must-have super-awesome for $FOO&quot; type questions." />
  <row Id="517" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="292" RevisionGUID="506c71a6-2d9d-4862-bb8a-796f28240313" CreationDate="2009-07-18T22:55:06.337" UserDisplayName="richardhoskins" Text="Why was my question on Superuser changed to community-wiki?" />
  <row Id="518" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="292" RevisionGUID="506c71a6-2d9d-4862-bb8a-796f28240313" CreationDate="2009-07-18T22:55:06.337" UserDisplayName="richardhoskins" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="519" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="292" RevisionGUID="3953b37c-6714-4ff2-92dc-d53eb971f8f8" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:57:43.440" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6997/why-was-my-question-on-superuser-changed-to-community-wiki" Text="" />
  <row Id="520" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="296" RevisionGUID="6002f339-bfc1-46aa-a6b9-326f92bf67fd" CreationDate="2009-07-19T04:31:46.010" UserDisplayName="Timothy Carter" Text="Jeff has mentioned it's good to point people to the [blog][1] so if they ever need to update the password you won't be out of date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/super-user-semi-private-beta-begins/" />
  <row Id="521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="295" RevisionGUID="d89fc411-03aa-4e40-83ff-b24651c81df6" CreationDate="2009-07-19T04:06:32.380" UserDisplayName="Carson Myers" Text="I always wished I never missed out on the SO beta, so, I really wanted into the SU-beta party. But there's no application anywhere--it seems to be invite only. This left me...Disappointed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But am I wrong? Is it too late to join the party?" />
  <row Id="522" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="295" RevisionGUID="d89fc411-03aa-4e40-83ff-b24651c81df6" CreationDate="2009-07-19T04:06:32.380" UserDisplayName="Carson Myers" Text="Is the superuser beta invite-only?" />
  <row Id="523" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="295" RevisionGUID="d89fc411-03aa-4e40-83ff-b24651c81df6" CreationDate="2009-07-19T04:06:32.380" UserDisplayName="Carson Myers" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="524" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="295" RevisionGUID="095b209b-164e-4df4-a0d0-431b74c69771" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:10.523" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7038/is-the-superuser-beta-invite-only" Text="" />
  <row Id="525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="298" RevisionGUID="b25178d4-fca3-4bb6-b18d-7541db76f27a" CreationDate="2009-07-20T21:53:32.637" UserDisplayName="TM" Text="I don't think that the solution to poor question topics is to forbid hardware discussion in general.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think there are a lot of great &quot;real questions&quot; that can come up related to hardware, whether it be related to troubleshooting, compatibility, installation, or a number of other factors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, I don't see any lack of &quot;best ___&quot; threads for software." />
  <row Id="526" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="299" RevisionGUID="6fec01b2-325e-464d-881e-668a32c34f40" CreationDate="2009-07-20T21:58:11.603" UserDisplayName="Timothy Carter" Text="I'm not surprised that early on their are a lot of &quot;best of&quot; questions. However, as time goes on I would hope and expect this to mostly resolve itself. Perhaps improving the description of what types of questions are desired would be helpful, but you have to be careful with the wording." />
  <row Id="527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="300" RevisionGUID="43f6a886-838e-4e29-aa11-273dc101ed92" CreationDate="2009-07-20T22:34:31.550" UserDisplayName="Chester" Text="I completely disagree with you on this...  SuperUser was advertised as the almost anything goes site so long as its computer related...  Questions like Must Haves or Best ofs should remain on the site, but subjective questions should be Community Wiki.  As the site matures and mods are created, that will only get better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="528" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="301" RevisionGUID="52799ff9-2cce-4041-bed4-6e6a33f1944e" CreationDate="2009-08-01T03:20:48.500" UserDisplayName="John Saunders" Text="What about questions like &quot;[I am planning to buy Laptop Lenovo G350, is it best for database and graphic design project?](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1193175/i-am-planning-to-buy-laptop-lenovo-g350-is-it-best-for-database-and-graphic-desi)&quot;, recently closed on SO. Would this be an appropriate question for SU?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Among other things, SU users could ask where the OP is getting a SQL Server 2000 license for a new laptop.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="302" RevisionGUID="c3ba2116-f984-412f-a6d0-c1b61b0ef049" CreationDate="2009-08-01T06:26:19.997" UserDisplayName="Adam Bernier" Text="For better or worse, it is in our nature to rank and categorize.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Best-of&quot; anything is what many people search for (who doesn't want the best?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These kinds of posts will likely get several thousands of views each." />
  <row Id="530" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="297" RevisionGUID="d9b127d5-2011-4f2d-b49c-97b97e0abcc2" CreationDate="2009-07-20T21:49:11.530" UserDisplayName="Masi" Text="**Problem:** I calculated that about the half of Superuser's questions are about &quot;Best Hardware&quot; or &quot;Best Laptop for Children&quot; or &quot;Any use sound card these days&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Suggestion for an improvement**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Change this &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  We prefer questions that can be answered, not just discussed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We prefer questions that can be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; answered. Questions like &quot;Best Laptop?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or &quot;You use sound-card?&quot; will be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; removed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My sample data shows that some people do not understand the main point in the statement. Most of the questions are hyperbolic which should be minimized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="531" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="297" RevisionGUID="d9b127d5-2011-4f2d-b49c-97b97e0abcc2" CreationDate="2009-07-20T21:49:11.530" UserDisplayName="Masi" Text="Forbid &quot;Best-Hardware&quot; questions in Superuser" />
  <row Id="532" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="297" RevisionGUID="d9b127d5-2011-4f2d-b49c-97b97e0abcc2" CreationDate="2009-07-20T21:49:11.530" UserDisplayName="Masi" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;description&gt;" />
  <row Id="533" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="297" RevisionGUID="852740a9-0ee8-4d00-a7db-36473e2c4661" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:11.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7544/forbid-best-hardware-questions-in-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="534" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="304" RevisionGUID="b37af988-0911-4d6e-a677-f80405001e81" CreationDate="2009-07-20T22:13:34.610" UserDisplayName="Marc Gravell" Text="I'm going to go out on a Endor limb, and say: no, not really. Unless it somehow involves a laptop, which is just disturbing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you are having problems with your 'droids..." />
  <row Id="535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="303" RevisionGUID="a39959fa-35c8-4344-b2d1-2110c0e88ee9" CreationDate="2009-07-20T21:56:23.867" UserDisplayName="Peter Boughton" Text="I thought SuperUser was intended to be very generalised, where almost anything goes. From the blog:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If your question has to do with computers, it will be allowed there.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; But then again, so are Ewoks. Be careful what you ask for, I guess.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;But, after noticing a lot of questions being closed, I checked the FAQ and saw that it limited to computer hardware and software, excluding games.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's [one ewok question][1], but it was closed for not being computer related.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what's up with that? Are Ewoks allowed or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/2822/what-do-you-do-next-in-life-after-starring-in-star-wars-as-an-ewok-closed" />
  <row Id="536" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="303" RevisionGUID="a39959fa-35c8-4344-b2d1-2110c0e88ee9" CreationDate="2009-07-20T21:56:23.867" UserDisplayName="Peter Boughton" Text="What sort of ewok questions are allowed on SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="537" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="303" RevisionGUID="a39959fa-35c8-4344-b2d1-2110c0e88ee9" CreationDate="2009-07-20T21:56:23.867" UserDisplayName="Peter Boughton" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="538" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="303" RevisionGUID="e030401b-94c7-43e5-b24e-71c40ffd96f7" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:12.423" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7549/what-sort-of-ewok-questions-are-allowed-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="306" RevisionGUID="15e608a6-5b52-4c0a-9365-90951b0b76d8" CreationDate="2009-07-20T23:50:09.547" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="The front pages of all the sites are cached every minute, which means that recent activity takes a minute or so to show up. What this means is that someone could delete their answer so that there were only two answers in the question, but because of the timing there were still three indicated on the front page." />
  <row Id="540" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="305" RevisionGUID="ba68fbeb-ca67-40ca-9448-77ca72e035dd" CreationDate="2009-07-20T23:48:16.880" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="I was just looking at [this post][1] that had 2 answers, but on the home page it said there were 3 answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I just went back and the third one is there now, does SU have some kind of timing problem?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/9633/e-book-reader" />
  <row Id="541" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="305" RevisionGUID="ba68fbeb-ca67-40ca-9448-77ca72e035dd" CreationDate="2009-07-20T23:48:16.880" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="Superuser homepage answer bug" />
  <row Id="542" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="305" RevisionGUID="ba68fbeb-ca67-40ca-9448-77ca72e035dd" CreationDate="2009-07-20T23:48:16.880" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;answers&gt;" />
  <row Id="543" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="305" RevisionGUID="d2c2d113-37ad-4701-adea-3348c48add84" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:12.727" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7598/superuser-homepage-answer-bug" Text="" />
  <row Id="544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="308" RevisionGUID="74945f44-e0ea-4ad8-8e3c-05e20a93a71b" CreationDate="2009-07-21T03:04:13.260" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="Nope. I live blissfully free of such worries. And *you can too*!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Steps to live blissfully free of such worries (for Windows users):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Open a command prompt (press the start button, click on &quot;Run&quot;, type in `cmd`, press &lt;kbd&gt;Enter&lt;/kbd&gt;)&#xD;&#xA;2. Type: `FORMAT C: /X`&#xD;&#xA;3. Press the &lt;kbd&gt;Enter&lt;/kbd&gt; key." />
  <row Id="545" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="308" RevisionGUID="74945f44-e0ea-4ad8-8e3c-05e20a93a71b" CreationDate="2009-07-21T03:04:13.260" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="546" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="307" RevisionGUID="9285b402-a62d-46c9-8b34-fcd80b82a840" CreationDate="2009-07-21T02:59:05.317" UserDisplayName="JP" Text="If not, why not?  If so, are there certain types of advice (reinstall for example) that you would not give without disclaimer?" />
  <row Id="547" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="307" RevisionGUID="9285b402-a62d-46c9-8b34-fcd80b82a840" CreationDate="2009-07-21T02:59:05.317" UserDisplayName="JP" Text="Do you have any worries with liability on SU?" />
  <row Id="548" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="307" RevisionGUID="9285b402-a62d-46c9-8b34-fcd80b82a840" CreationDate="2009-07-21T02:59:05.317" UserDisplayName="JP" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="549" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="307" RevisionGUID="9285b402-a62d-46c9-8b34-fcd80b82a840" CreationDate="2009-07-21T02:59:05.317" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="550" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="307" RevisionGUID="cee31f1c-a2c3-44cc-b08a-18ea59ea0720" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:13.067" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7645/do-you-have-any-worries-with-liability-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="310" RevisionGUID="4346bbc3-887c-4e93-947f-aa780a829730" CreationDate="2009-07-21T14:54:21.033" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="You've already got enough people crying about it melting their eyes. I doubt you would get a lot of support for upping the intensity of the blue." />
  <row Id="552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="311" RevisionGUID="29925401-7bbc-4617-9be5-893ae1f8f212" CreationDate="2009-07-21T15:18:23.757" UserDisplayName="David M" Text="Personally, I'd like it in IBM PC green on a black background." />
  <row Id="553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="312" RevisionGUID="adc45545-5077-42a8-99f2-9e56e3d3839a" CreationDate="2009-07-21T18:48:19.550" UserDisplayName="arrocharGeek" Text="YES - way up, turn the blue way up to BLINDING BLUE LED BLUE" />
  <row Id="554" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="312" RevisionGUID="adc45545-5077-42a8-99f2-9e56e3d3839a" CreationDate="2009-07-21T18:48:19.550" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="555" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="313" RevisionGUID="c2430fc0-8827-4a8d-8a81-086cae14d96f" CreationDate="2009-07-21T18:49:02.643" UserDisplayName="arrocharGeek" Text="NO - don't do it." />
  <row Id="556" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="313" RevisionGUID="c2430fc0-8827-4a8d-8a81-086cae14d96f" CreationDate="2009-07-21T18:49:02.643" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="557" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="309" RevisionGUID="d76112ce-4fbe-444d-a9f5-684181ca00ee" CreationDate="2009-07-21T14:51:46.003" UserDisplayName="arrocharGeek" Text="I mean, when I think of super user geeks, I think of those intense blue LEDs beaming from within the case etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you think the blue needs more intensity to look like a blue LED, please vote up YES.&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, vote up NO." />
  <row Id="558" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="309" RevisionGUID="d76112ce-4fbe-444d-a9f5-684181ca00ee" CreationDate="2009-07-21T14:51:46.003" UserDisplayName="arrocharGeek" Text="Should not the Super User (SU) Logo and Color Scheme Use LED Blue?" />
  <row Id="559" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="309" RevisionGUID="d76112ce-4fbe-444d-a9f5-684181ca00ee" CreationDate="2009-07-21T14:51:46.003" UserDisplayName="arrocharGeek" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="560" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="309" RevisionGUID="f468a68a-f13a-4d3f-9582-4627d0d7ac5a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:13.897" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7783/should-not-the-super-user-su-logo-and-color-scheme-use-led-blue" Text="" />
  <row Id="561" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="315" RevisionGUID="aeeabad8-49cc-49c7-9831-138d7cf40c15" CreationDate="2009-07-21T16:15:28.750" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="The page shows up fine for me. I was going to say that if you are seeing Page Not Found that it was probably deleted, but that question you are linking to is open and available." />
  <row Id="562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="316" RevisionGUID="1abf7ff3-89f4-48fe-99ba-684f4d88c510" CreationDate="2009-07-22T08:19:10.563" Text="I suspect your cookies got trashed somehow along the way? Not sure, no other reports of this or known issues." />
  <row Id="563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="314" RevisionGUID="2e59d0dc-5a67-411d-acc5-14ce3c7a0423" CreationDate="2009-07-21T16:13:05.603" UserDisplayName="arathorn" Text="I'm trying to edit [this answer][1] of mine over on SuperUser, but when I save the edits, I get redirected to a SU Page Not Found page. Some notes:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - My edit is just adding a link to the page (and describing the edit in the Edit Summary). (I've tried just adding some basic text instead of a link -- same result.)&#xD;&#xA; - I've tried this edit a number of times, always with the same result.&#xD;&#xA; - I've been able to make edits to other questions without any problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's what I'm seeing:&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE: And now it's working. I'm not aware of anything that's changed, other than making successful edits to a few other pages in the mean time.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/9118/any-recommendations-on-a-nas-for-a-home-super-user/9186#9186&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imagechicken.com/uploads/1248197029097265000.jpg" />
  <row Id="564" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="314" RevisionGUID="2e59d0dc-5a67-411d-acc5-14ce3c7a0423" CreationDate="2009-07-21T16:13:05.603" UserDisplayName="arathorn" Text="Page Not Found when submitting edited answer" />
  <row Id="565" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="314" RevisionGUID="2e59d0dc-5a67-411d-acc5-14ce3c7a0423" CreationDate="2009-07-21T16:13:05.603" UserDisplayName="arathorn" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-norepro&gt;&lt;editing&gt;" />
  <row Id="566" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="314" RevisionGUID="2bbce9d5-b49a-4ef4-ab37-a68df2761832" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:14.733" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7818/page-not-found-when-submitting-edited-answer" Text="" />
  <row Id="567" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="318" RevisionGUID="8ee076d1-17bd-41cc-8013-6621b521af8d" CreationDate="2009-07-21T21:51:54.627" UserDisplayName="Brad Gilbert" Text="### Here's a listing of all of the `*virtual*` tags. *( except SO )*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Super User&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;         13 × virtualmachine&#xD;&#xA;         12 × virtualbox&#xD;&#xA;          2 × virtualization&#xD;&#xA;          1 × virtual&#xD;&#xA;          1 × virtual-desktop&#xD;&#xA;          1 × virtualdesktops&#xD;&#xA;          1 × virtualdub&#xD;&#xA;          1 × virtual-machine&#xD;&#xA;          1 × virtualpc&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Server Fault&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;         11 × virtual&#xD;&#xA;        192 × virtualization&#xD;&#xA;         53 × virtual-machines&#xD;&#xA;         31 × virtualbox&#xD;&#xA;         22 × virtualpc&#xD;&#xA;         13 × virtualhosts&#xD;&#xA;          6 × msvirtualserver&#xD;&#xA;          3 × virtual-memory&#xD;&#xA;          3 × virtualserver&#xD;&#xA;          2 × virtualdirectories&#xD;&#xA;          2 × virtual-domains&#xD;&#xA;          2 × virtualdrive&#xD;&#xA;          2 × virtual-drive&#xD;&#xA;          2 × virtualhost&#xD;&#xA;          2 × virtual-pc&#xD;&#xA;          1 × application-virtualizati&#xD;&#xA;          1 × virtual-connect&#xD;&#xA;          1 × virtual-harddrive&#xD;&#xA;          1 × virtual-machine&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Stack Overflow&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        168 × virtualization&#xD;&#xA;         41 × virtual-machines [Marc: merged into virtual-machine]&#xD;&#xA;         11 × virtual-memory&#xD;&#xA;         11 × virtual-directories [Marc: merged into virtual-directory]&#xD;&#xA;          1 × virtualdirectory [Marc: merged into virtual-directory]&#xD;&#xA;          6 × virtual-directory&#xD;&#xA;          5 × virtual-machine&#xD;&#xA;          1 × virtual-disk&#xD;&#xA;          1 × virtual-drive&#xD;&#xA;        [Marc: also tidied up virtual-pc and virtual-server]&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="568" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="317" RevisionGUID="10310ef5-641d-49e7-be3c-b56e8ecb576a" CreationDate="2009-07-21T21:33:23.303" UserDisplayName="perbert" Text="I've seen many multi-word tags without hyphen in superuser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The last ones being virtualmachine and virtualdesktop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should they be changed this way?:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;kbd&gt;virtualmachine&lt;/kbd&gt; =&gt; &lt;kbd&gt;virtual-machine&lt;/kbd&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;kbd&gt;virtualdesktops&lt;/kbd&gt; =&gt; &lt;kbd&gt;virtual-desktop&lt;/kbd&gt; (or &lt;kbd&gt;virtual-desktops&lt;/kbd&gt;?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the different sites there are different tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should be singular or plural? I'm leaning towards singular." />
  <row Id="569" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="317" RevisionGUID="10310ef5-641d-49e7-be3c-b56e8ecb576a" CreationDate="2009-07-21T21:33:23.303" UserDisplayName="perbert" Text="Change virtualmachine and virtualdesktop to virtual-machine and virtual-desktop" />
  <row Id="570" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="317" RevisionGUID="10310ef5-641d-49e7-be3c-b56e8ecb576a" CreationDate="2009-07-21T21:33:23.303" UserDisplayName="perbert" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="571" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="317" RevisionGUID="7c546bac-bbd2-4dc1-b5e0-b02b05365c89" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:15.030" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7929/change-virtualmachine-and-virtualdesktop-to-virtual-machine-and-virtual-desktop" Text="" />
  <row Id="572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="320" RevisionGUID="cfa0d372-4fbe-4fb5-ab29-94150d9a3718" CreationDate="2009-07-22T05:27:29.837" UserDisplayName="Jon Skeet" Text="Chances are these were due to the rep limit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were at 195 (e.g. 18 upvotes + 1 accepted answer) the next upvote would be worth 5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you were then downvoted (putting you at 198) the next upvote would be worth 2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: I hadn't spotted the 'no downvotes' bit before. Are you sure? What do my reputation tracker show? (On phone, so can't do links easily, but http://csharpindepth.com/StackOverflow/ReputationTracker.aspx should get you there.)" />
  <row Id="573" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="319" RevisionGUID="9c1540d6-18f1-4d3c-b000-38b77856708b" CreationDate="2009-07-22T05:25:46.263" UserDisplayName="MicTech" Text="My answers on SuperUser get different points from upvoteds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One get 5 points and other one get 2 points. (no downvotes)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is this happening?" />
  <row Id="574" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="319" RevisionGUID="9c1540d6-18f1-4d3c-b000-38b77856708b" CreationDate="2009-07-22T05:25:46.263" UserDisplayName="MicTech" Text="Why I get different points from upvoted?" />
  <row Id="575" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="319" RevisionGUID="9c1540d6-18f1-4d3c-b000-38b77856708b" CreationDate="2009-07-22T05:25:46.263" UserDisplayName="MicTech" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="576" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="319" RevisionGUID="a05ef032-b8ca-46bc-b72f-ce0fdcf363ca" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:15.237" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8017/why-i-get-different-points-from-upvoted" Text="" />
  <row Id="590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="327" RevisionGUID="d58e0015-665d-4ba9-ae46-d299502b061b" CreationDate="2009-07-23T11:24:13.307" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="At first I thought there was something wrong with my computer, but now I actually like them because they actually bring out the quotes a lot better. I don't think it's the -best- idea, but it's a lot better than trying to guess where the quotes are." />
  <row Id="591" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="328" RevisionGUID="291cfb20-30b6-427f-a6db-14cc24b916ad" CreationDate="2009-07-23T11:31:37.770" UserDisplayName="pgs" Text="I like them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to see more difference between code and quotes (beyond code getting a fixed width font), though." />
  <row Id="592" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="329" RevisionGUID="32076ab5-dcb4-41e7-a9ca-39c30e9e576d" CreationDate="2009-07-23T13:08:58.247" UserDisplayName="RCIX" Text="I'd rather see them suspended in some sort of dark gray box, that is just too distracting for me right now." />
  <row Id="593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="330" RevisionGUID="538e38e0-1480-4e14-9c9e-a9e1586c3f2b" CreationDate="2009-07-23T17:22:06.623" UserDisplayName="Brad Gilbert" Text="I would also like to see something similar here on Meta." />
  <row Id="594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="331" RevisionGUID="350bf9ab-293f-4926-b595-dc3366bddeb3" CreationDate="2009-10-13T13:35:29.353" UserDisplayName="perbert" Text="I agree with [TheTXI][1], I actually like the hard highlight, as on some LCDs the greyish is too subtle to be distinguished.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8446/su-blockquotes/8448#8448" />
  <row Id="595" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="332" RevisionGUID="77f1c81b-b01c-498e-b867-9522c59714c7" CreationDate="2010-07-05T14:54:02.663" UserDisplayName="Lazer" Text="Maybe keep them for the quotes but remove them from code. It is way too distracting to be of any use." />
  <row Id="596" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="326" RevisionGUID="a2717d82-ae79-4440-808e-d8b53bfddd23" CreationDate="2009-07-23T11:19:30.947" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="Well, it appears they've been revamped (after some here mentioned they were a bit too subtle.) What do you guys think of them now? Too pronounced? Perhas the blue bar should be washed out a bit more...Either way, it's definitely an improvement over the almost-non-detectable-background from before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.sampsonresume.com/labs/su-blockquote.jpg" />
  <row Id="597" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="326" RevisionGUID="a2717d82-ae79-4440-808e-d8b53bfddd23" CreationDate="2009-07-23T11:19:30.947" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="SU           Blockquotes" />
  <row Id="598" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="326" RevisionGUID="a2717d82-ae79-4440-808e-d8b53bfddd23" CreationDate="2009-07-23T11:19:30.947" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="599" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="326" RevisionGUID="3067d314-cb48-4ef4-a956-d8bc507d403c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:15.867" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8446/su-blockquotes" Text="" />
  <row Id="600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="334" RevisionGUID="473103e5-f8bc-48e5-80f6-ca40b312f991" CreationDate="2009-07-23T15:40:34.817" UserDisplayName="Eric" Text="I think SU opened up with a lot of &quot;Must Have&quot; and &quot;Best Of&quot; posts to get it populated by the lovely beta users. Remember that these users came from SO and SF, and are very much used to the poll questions being Wikis (as they should be). However, I expect to see more of the, &quot;My bloody computer doesn't know how to stand by, wtf?&quot; questions as the site grows out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SU was never meant to be (and shouldn't be) a computer-related discussion site. At its heart, it's still Q&amp;A. This engine just doesn't do discussion very well, but it does do Q&amp;A remarkably." />
  <row Id="601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="335" RevisionGUID="7f6d971c-1417-4f3a-9097-500fa5a43651" CreationDate="2009-07-23T15:41:27.500" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="Even I, the anti-community-wiki-police person, think that SU has attracted all the worst questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But maybe thats it's place in the universe." />
  <row Id="602" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="336" RevisionGUID="67bfb15f-92ea-4eed-90ee-c9d31f2e2397" CreationDate="2009-07-23T15:48:38.243" UserDisplayName="Chester" Text="&gt; asked to turn to wiki questions&#xD;&#xA;&gt; because there is a shred of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subjectivity in them&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe its just me, but I consider &quot;Best of&quot; &quot;Must have&quot; type of questions to have just a bit more than a shred of subjectivity in them.  Folks asking questions about posting wall papers and other things have more than a shred of subjectivity...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reality is that unless the question is targeted towards getting a single best answer, it probably belongs a CW and treated like a poll.  Take the iPhone must have apps question as an example...  That seems to make perfect us of CW.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take this question for [example][1], is it possible that there is more than one right answer, sure...  Is it fair to say there is subjectivity to it, sure...  Should this be CW?  NO.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reality is that SU is a place for questions related to computers.  If you compare what related to computers means to related to programming on SO, obviously questions on programmer jokes and programming careers seem to be OK, so shouldn't those questions on computers be OK as well?  SO is no longer just for how do I solve X with this code block, and the other sites are following in the SO footsteps.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/11501/how-can-i-get-download-protected-shows-on-my-tivo-to-my-computer" />
  <row Id="603" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="337" RevisionGUID="a7872e7c-db57-4c50-bdc8-95cfd05c80bc" CreationDate="2009-07-23T15:53:19.923" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="I think the fact that there is already a fairly sizable outrage over the numerous CW-style posts on SuperUser gives a good indicator of how the community is going to react to these questions when they start getting the rep to actually vote to close. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been pretty lenient as far as what is allowed and what isn't and there have only been several instances where things are just outright not allowed (like questions relating specifically to games) because Jeff's original vision was for something more open-ended than the other sites. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've given my own opinions on what I like and what I would like to see SuperUser grow into on some other questions and answers and they all appear to have gotten very good community response judging by the votes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All I can say is that if you find something in there that needs to be CW or needs to be gone, or whatever, make sure you flag it or send me an email (my contact details are located on my SuperUser profile) or get in touch with me some other way and I can make every attempt to clean it up if it is deemed necessary." />
  <row Id="604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="338" RevisionGUID="746d3281-a245-47ad-a3eb-8d8732a4dcba" CreationDate="2009-07-27T06:46:37.093" UserDisplayName="Ralph Rickenbach" Text="I am under the impression that on SU we at the moment have mostly people coming from SO, some from SF. They are professionals with little questions like &quot;I don't know how to do that...&quot; that would not belong on either SO or SF. And they are experienced with SO and SF, having a model for wiki in their head that for SU is highly influenced by and only little loosened from their home trilogy page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do expect that when &quot;real users&quot; become the majority on SU, the type of questions will change as well as the policies. Because then the superuser community will &quot;police&quot; and form the site. So far I do think that we are doing what we often do: we pros (professional programmers and IT technicians) tell the users what's right and appropriate." />
  <row Id="605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="333" RevisionGUID="dc961286-4e08-47e5-9d4b-b8ef6702c04a" CreationDate="2009-07-23T15:36:58.827" UserDisplayName="Dillie-O" Text="I don't know if it is the new breed of users flowing into SuperUser (I haven't done comparisons yet between the sites), or I'm just clicking into the wrong questions, but it seems to me that an abnormally large amount of questions on Super User tend to get flagged as Wiki questions straight off the bat, or are immediately asked to turn to wiki questions because there is a shred of subjectivity in them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me this seems to go a bit against the model of what SuperUser was for. I was always under the impression that SuperUser was going to be the site where I could gain oodles of rep for my silly wallpaper of VeggieTales or for mentioning in passing that Peggle was the best iPod Touch game EVER. Having a large volume of wiki questions makes me a *Sad Panda*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm fully aware that the community decides how everything works, but I just want to see what folks are thinking about SuperUser and if it is fitting with the model of SO and SF?" />
  <row Id="606" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="333" RevisionGUID="dc961286-4e08-47e5-9d4b-b8ef6702c04a" CreationDate="2009-07-23T15:36:58.827" UserDisplayName="Dillie-O" Text="SuperUser a WikiFest?" />
  <row Id="607" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="333" RevisionGUID="dc961286-4e08-47e5-9d4b-b8ef6702c04a" CreationDate="2009-07-23T15:36:58.827" UserDisplayName="Dillie-O" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="608" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="333" RevisionGUID="478a6c7e-e421-4ee1-9bec-472e0c4534d9" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:16.427" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8531/superuser-a-wikifest" Text="" />
  <row Id="609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="340" RevisionGUID="5db50c5d-ce18-4580-ad0b-b7a5ed5eb04a" CreationDate="2009-07-24T12:55:14.987" UserDisplayName="Jon Skeet" Text="I'd go for `usb-storage` - this doesn't differentiate between pen drives and USB hard drives, admittedly. Sometimes that's a good thing, sometimes it's not. (Things like plugging your phone into your computer are a third category, I guess...)" />
  <row Id="610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="341" RevisionGUID="f5a03965-02bf-426e-8aa0-6b090344f960" CreationDate="2009-07-24T12:56:59.077" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Thumb drive is always the one that sticks in my mind because it is what I use personally, but I think what Jon said concerning usb-storage is probably the best because it is more generic and can encompass all the others which seem to be describing the style more than the function." />
  <row Id="611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="342" RevisionGUID="3a58686b-6c09-49fd-93b3-809fa2e26941" CreationDate="2009-07-24T13:02:15.803" UserDisplayName="Patrick McElhaney" Text="I'd go with [usb-flash-drive][1]. On Wikipedia, all of the terms you suggested redirect there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_flash_drive" />
  <row Id="612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="344" RevisionGUID="88ebd699-2ed6-4358-83db-373b9913d82b" CreationDate="2009-07-24T13:04:27.047" UserDisplayName="Simon P Stevens" Text="Wikipeida redirects all to &quot;[USB flash drive][1]&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[USB stick][2]  &#xD;&#xA;[Thumb drive][3]  &#xD;&#xA;[Pen drive][4]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think we should use that. It's the most descriptive and least ambiguous.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_flash_drive&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=usb%20stick&amp;redirect=no&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=thumb_drive&amp;redirect=no&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pen_drive&amp;redirect=no" />
  <row Id="613" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="343" RevisionGUID="8eb1b62c-9f4c-4b6d-9262-f54f72fd50b6" CreationDate="2009-07-24T13:02:55.373" UserDisplayName="perbert" Text="Also, it depends on the place of the world you are in. Down here in Argentina, only the most technical people will refer to them as anything other than &quot;pendrives&quot;, and only when talking online. Pendrive has become as something of a standard here." />
  <row Id="614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="339" RevisionGUID="1c190174-749d-473e-a924-522d22759a16" CreationDate="2009-07-24T12:50:16.970" UserDisplayName="mas" Text="There are several questions, particularly on SU, which refer to the use of these drives but there isn't a standard term in use nor a standard tag (though SU has 'thumbdrive' it is not consistently used).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Would there be any advantage to having a standard tag to ease searches?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Taking the initial responses into account the preferred terms (in order of usefulness/popularity/usage/...?) seem to be&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;usb-flash-drive&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;usb-storage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;pendrive&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;thumbdrive&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;usb-drive&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;usb-stick&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for the contributions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="615" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="339" RevisionGUID="1c190174-749d-473e-a924-522d22759a16" CreationDate="2009-07-24T12:50:16.970" UserDisplayName="mas" Text="Standard term for usb-flash-drive/usbpen/thumb/stick?" />
  <row Id="616" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="339" RevisionGUID="1c190174-749d-473e-a924-522d22759a16" CreationDate="2009-07-24T12:50:16.970" UserDisplayName="mas" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="617" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="339" RevisionGUID="a7ec1d55-6ee6-4052-a17b-e3d9bcdd71f4" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:17.103" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8928/standard-term-for-usb-flash-drive-usbpen-thumb-stick" Text="" />
  <row Id="618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="346" RevisionGUID="67fb73b1-d562-4b16-9515-dc8235c54dfd" CreationDate="2009-07-25T03:02:59.477" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="The SuperUser beta period is more for the moderators and the community to flesh out what is going to be acceptable and unacceptable behavior more than it is testing out the software itself. It is important to get this nailed down so that the guidelines are going to be something the entire community can follow going forward. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also work being done tweaking the UI (stylesheets, etc.) on SuperUser." />
  <row Id="619" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="347" RevisionGUID="4ff4383d-739a-4ec2-bbb1-264a1c5e8a5c" CreationDate="2009-07-25T03:04:40.463" UserDisplayName="Kevin Worthington" Text="The beta period allows for questions and answers to be generated before it is open to the &quot;general public.&quot;" />
  <row Id="620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="348" RevisionGUID="a3030421-a6e9-44cc-86bf-3f45744e8985" CreationDate="2009-07-25T09:02:42.680" UserDisplayName="chakrit" Text="I see 2 points:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* Avoid the &quot;empty restaurant&quot; effect and...&#xD;&#xA;* Make sure there is some (good) guidance/community rules going before it's open to the public" />
  <row Id="621" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="345" RevisionGUID="487da982-6140-455e-8135-24e6282bf524" CreationDate="2009-07-25T02:44:22.663" UserDisplayName="matthews" Text="The StackOverflow software (if it has a generic name by now, I'd like to know) is fairly mature by now, and most of the kinks have been worked out. What's the point of having a beta period for SuperUser? It's not like you're introducing something radically new -- just a new topic." />
  <row Id="622" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="345" RevisionGUID="487da982-6140-455e-8135-24e6282bf524" CreationDate="2009-07-25T02:44:22.663" UserDisplayName="matthews" Text="Do we really need a beta period for SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="623" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="345" RevisionGUID="487da982-6140-455e-8135-24e6282bf524" CreationDate="2009-07-25T02:44:22.663" UserDisplayName="matthews" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;beta&gt;" />
  <row Id="624" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="345" RevisionGUID="a144e102-7e81-4566-9b47-2e5686e78f21" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:17.637" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/9463/do-we-really-need-a-beta-period-for-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="350" RevisionGUID="ba7b22c2-cfb5-41b2-993c-d86ba422c52e" CreationDate="2009-07-27T17:36:57.580" UserDisplayName="mmyers" Text="Yes, it has already been done more than once.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google][1] turns up a few migrated questions, although most of the results are from meta.stackoverflow.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Some examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1136890/remove-a-specific-file-from-a-subversion-repository&#xD;&#xA;- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1152340/why-are-developers-generally-opposed-to-purchasing-software-tools&#xD;&#xA;- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1140311/using-python-to-automate-creation-manipulation-of-excel-spreadsheets&#xD;&#xA;- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1178475/looking-for-a-free-java-ide&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=%22migrated+from+superuser.com%22+site%3Astackoverflow.com" />
  <row Id="626" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="349" RevisionGUID="bba00e2a-a3ff-497a-8f16-3fba6fe8cc97" CreationDate="2009-07-27T17:28:39.517" UserDisplayName="Bogdan_Ch" Text="I know some questions are moved from SO to SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will SU moderators be able to do a migration from SU to SO/SF ?&#xD;&#xA;(I just dont have enough points to test how migration works myself :) )" />
  <row Id="627" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="349" RevisionGUID="bba00e2a-a3ff-497a-8f16-3fba6fe8cc97" CreationDate="2009-07-27T17:28:39.517" UserDisplayName="Bogdan_Ch" Text="Will it be possible to vote for migrating a question from superuser.com to stackoverflow or servefault?" />
  <row Id="628" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="349" RevisionGUID="bba00e2a-a3ff-497a-8f16-3fba6fe8cc97" CreationDate="2009-07-27T17:28:39.517" UserDisplayName="Bogdan_Ch" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="629" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="349" RevisionGUID="5a7f84c9-2554-4018-ac93-dc273307b79e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:18.233" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10120/will-it-be-possible-to-vote-for-migrating-a-question-from-superuser-com-to-stacko" Text="" />
  <row Id="630" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="352" RevisionGUID="412c63b5-ac27-4630-9ddb-d17dcdbefe3f" CreationDate="2009-07-27T18:20:59.637" UserDisplayName="Hilarious Comedy Pesto" Text="Bill the Lizard moved it with his witchcraft, but I suspect it was because it isn't really about programming.  It's asking for a plugin for his blog; not how to design a plugin, not how to work with the API of a plugin, not how to import a plugin into his custom blog software." />
  <row Id="631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="353" RevisionGUID="0f09c90b-2f9a-4116-9c88-8cdbda3ca013" CreationDate="2009-07-27T18:21:16.030" UserDisplayName="Joel Coehoorn" Text="It's a judgement call, and anytime it's close it's going to end up on the more general site because it only takes 5 users who favor that site to push it there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, in this case I suspect it's because it's not talking about writing or changing any new code, but just looking to setup or configure something that's already written.  " />
  <row Id="632" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="354" RevisionGUID="f4c96799-b2f4-43f9-9cec-8e09cf1c3ea3" CreationDate="2009-07-27T19:22:02.877" UserDisplayName="Marc Gravell" Text="Curious; I probably wouldn't have migrated that, but it is sometimes a tricky call. You'd be surprised how odd things get; I had a moderator flag earlier asking (quite correctly) for a moderator to save a SO post about using **linux on a laptop** from going to SF, when it is clearly SU material (it was 1 vote away from SF)." />
  <row Id="633" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="351" RevisionGUID="7b080a44-0ab7-4710-a3de-32f515745248" CreationDate="2009-07-27T18:18:11.093" UserDisplayName="Juan Manuel" Text="http://superuser.com/questions/13830&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not whining, just wondering" />
  <row Id="634" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="351" RevisionGUID="7b080a44-0ab7-4710-a3de-32f515745248" CreationDate="2009-07-27T18:18:11.093" UserDisplayName="Juan Manuel" Text="Why does this question belong on superuser?" />
  <row Id="635" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="351" RevisionGUID="7b080a44-0ab7-4710-a3de-32f515745248" CreationDate="2009-07-27T18:18:11.093" UserDisplayName="Juan Manuel" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="636" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="351" RevisionGUID="8a9a548c-a23a-49ed-9d7a-885358835d14" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:18.397" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10137/why-does-this-question-belong-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="356" RevisionGUID="5f2bc23b-7fe3-4dab-8d0c-30192cd32cde" CreationDate="2009-07-27T20:41:07.883" UserDisplayName="Brad Gilbert" Text="The search engine is probably finding it in multiple answers to that question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You have to remember that the search engine gets to search over the internal version of every page." />
  <row Id="638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="355" RevisionGUID="a1d3bc97-67e7-4a7c-be7e-66a96653fa97" CreationDate="2009-07-27T20:30:54.033" UserDisplayName="Gavin Miller" Text="I was doing a search over at SuperUser and had 6 / 50 duplicate results of *What are the best Excel tips?* appear on the first page of the following search:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://superuser.com/search?q=excel+drop+down&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems to me that a distinct search would be more useful." />
  <row Id="639" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="355" RevisionGUID="a1d3bc97-67e7-4a7c-be7e-66a96653fa97" CreationDate="2009-07-27T20:30:54.033" UserDisplayName="Gavin Miller" Text="Duplicate results in SuperUser Search" />
  <row Id="640" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="355" RevisionGUID="a1d3bc97-67e7-4a7c-be7e-66a96653fa97" CreationDate="2009-07-27T20:30:54.033" UserDisplayName="Gavin Miller" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="641" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="355" RevisionGUID="b8eb305c-bb2d-405d-ae40-7edea4156cd7" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:19.060" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10175/duplicate-results-in-superuser-search" Text="" />
  <row Id="642" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="358" RevisionGUID="40a13d21-95bb-4958-b825-72623cd61e62" CreationDate="2009-07-28T00:44:31.597" UserDisplayName="gnovice" Text="Ideally, it would have been edited before migrating it, but I guess it's a race between those who edit and those who close/migrate. If it's closed too fast, it falls to the SuperUser side to edit it. However, take heart in the fact that there should be [more SU moderators showing up soon][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/why-cant-you-have-just-one-site/" />
  <row Id="643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="359" RevisionGUID="389af386-c9ae-4238-83b5-6c1f26ff7600" CreationDate="2009-07-28T00:47:16.917" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="This is why SU [needs more moderators][1]. The question obviously did not belong on SO, and *could* have belonged on SU... but as you note, it should have been cleaned up or closed immediately. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###See also: [serverfault.com is not your trash bin!][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10166/please-use-your-votes-on-super-user-we-will-be-choosing-moderators-soon&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/4679/serverfault-com-is-not-your-trash-bin" />
  <row Id="644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="360" RevisionGUID="cecdca90-d843-4b34-a7c6-a42acd1d4491" CreationDate="2009-07-28T01:10:18.337" UserDisplayName="Bill the Lizard" Text="I don't think this is a &quot;dumping ground&quot; problem.  That question got migrated because enough people think it belongs on SU, not because it was poorly phrased." />
  <row Id="645" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="362" RevisionGUID="11645871-90e6-43d2-a885-a9916dacee7d" CreationDate="2009-07-28T05:59:47.603" UserDisplayName="JP" Text="[Firewall blocked some features of the program][1] is an interesting one.  The way I read it, he's asking a development question (his new build does not work with his firewall).  That seems like an SO question to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/14226/firewall-blocked-some-features-of-the-program" />
  <row Id="646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="363" RevisionGUID="d21df741-bb03-4142-8b2f-db754ede6581" CreationDate="2009-07-28T11:32:52.823" UserDisplayName="Brian Knoblauch" Text="Yeah, it's a dumping ground, but I don't consider that a bad thing." />
  <row Id="647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="364" RevisionGUID="1f2d80d6-57f6-4df7-89ec-e60b0d4c962e" CreationDate="2009-07-28T17:33:01.207" UserDisplayName="perbert" Text="I guess that SU and SO/SF will have the same relationship the Earth have with Jupiter. By having a lower hanging fruit for bad questions to be asked, SO/SF will keep cleaner. That also hints that SU will far more moderation attention once it goes out of beta (you could argue that it already does)." />
  <row Id="648" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="361" RevisionGUID="a6ca4d48-a058-4fd5-85b1-d81508bc49e7" CreationDate="2009-07-28T02:04:27.913" UserDisplayName="pgs" Text="[This question](http://superuser.com/questions/13950/who-is-your-number-one-guru-in-software-development) is one that should not have been migrated from SO.  The keywords in the subject and first sentence are *Software Development*.  If that's not SO material then I don't know what is." />
  <row Id="649" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="357" RevisionGUID="4e77c1f8-f5d1-4428-a4a5-75ef1d20e2c5" CreationDate="2009-07-28T00:37:31.383" UserDisplayName="Bruce McLeod" Text="This question [http://superuser.com/questions/14096/can-we-change-a-theme-in-wordpress-com][1]&#xD;&#xA;of **very** poor quality just got moved from stackoverflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; hi /// Can we change theme in wordpress.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exemple : urblog.wordpress.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that this question should have just been closed, or edited to a higher quality when it was migrated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Did this just &quot;slip through the net&quot;, or is there a danger that Superuser.com going to become a dumping ground for  questions from stack overflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is especially an issue at the moment with no 10k+ users who can fix up the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/14096/can-we-change-a-theme-in-wordpress-com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;the main reason that I ask is that I want to try an keep the quality of superuser as high as possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts ?" />
  <row Id="650" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="357" RevisionGUID="4e77c1f8-f5d1-4428-a4a5-75ef1d20e2c5" CreationDate="2009-07-28T00:37:31.383" UserDisplayName="Bruce McLeod" Text="Is superuser a stackoverflow dumping ground?" />
  <row Id="651" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="357" RevisionGUID="4e77c1f8-f5d1-4428-a4a5-75ef1d20e2c5" CreationDate="2009-07-28T00:37:31.383" UserDisplayName="Bruce McLeod" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="652" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="357" RevisionGUID="1f0e20e3-cdef-435d-b260-aceb88f32172" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:20.127" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10219/is-superuser-a-stackoverflow-dumping-ground" Text="" />
  <row Id="653" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="366" RevisionGUID="0a44b0b1-a9cf-467d-82f3-bf074088d0a4" CreationDate="2009-07-28T01:32:28.103" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Going with **eee-pc**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are at least some SuperUser users over the 500 rep mark, which would mean they'd be able to retag them into the same eee-pc box." />
  <row Id="654" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="365" RevisionGUID="6ed97c35-9c11-4b26-92a8-7839d82ebc66" CreationDate="2009-07-28T01:15:19.240" UserDisplayName="phenry" Text="The trademark is &quot;Eee PC&quot;, so I assume the one with the hyphen is the best candidate to be the canonical tag. There are only three affected questions, so this one should be easy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All glory to &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/14037/is-it-just-me-or-the-eeepcs-wireless-is-woefully-underpowered&quot;&gt;Joakim Elofsson&lt;/a&gt; for finding this one." />
  <row Id="655" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="365" RevisionGUID="6ed97c35-9c11-4b26-92a8-7839d82ebc66" CreationDate="2009-07-28T01:15:19.240" UserDisplayName="phenry" Text="Merge 'eee', 'eeepc' with the 'eee-pc' tag on Super User" />
  <row Id="656" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="365" RevisionGUID="6ed97c35-9c11-4b26-92a8-7839d82ebc66" CreationDate="2009-07-28T01:15:19.240" UserDisplayName="phenry" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="657" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="365" RevisionGUID="0585dc49-33ab-40b0-abf6-ff463f79c2f4" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:21.327" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10227/merge-eee-eeepc-with-the-eee-pc-tag-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="368" RevisionGUID="43fd3788-b6fe-4c77-bdf0-32c082b46b60" CreationDate="2009-07-28T16:59:53.677" UserDisplayName="Hilarious Comedy Pesto" Text="I only see 7 badges.  Maybe this is related to the [madness from this morning][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10392/how-did-i-get-a-peer-pressure-badge-w-o-3-vote" />
  <row Id="659" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="369" RevisionGUID="a72f6697-9ab3-48b1-8a63-fe3cdb35e3c9" CreationDate="2009-07-28T17:16:16.150" UserDisplayName="nik" Text="@Jonathan and Pesto,  &#xD;&#xA;I think he refers to the 30 Bronze in his `SU Flair`,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;span title=\&quot;30 bronze badges\&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check his account on one of the other sites to see his SU-flair.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;To answer you recent question, I can see the 30 Bronze in your flair in,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- questions you have asked&#xD;&#xA;- accounts area&#xD;&#xA;  - have also pasted the text from your flair above" />
  <row Id="660" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="370" RevisionGUID="0b734d6f-b4b2-4ed1-8dad-2bd7daa98c06" CreationDate="2009-07-28T23:27:49.117" Text="it'll fix itself when you get another badge." />
  <row Id="661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="367" RevisionGUID="fd5bd6b5-4931-4b16-a82e-4c4cf082e23d" CreationDate="2009-07-28T16:57:05.407" UserDisplayName="EvilChookie" Text="My [SuperUser Account][1] is now showing that I have 30 badges, but I only have 7 or so. I've tried logging in and out .. not helping.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I don't mind having 30 badges listed .. are there even 30 bronze badges? And can I get 30 badges for finding such a odd thing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit** Let me show some pichars.. and yes, my profile shows correctly, but answers and login bar do not display correctly. Is it just for me, or do other people see 30 badges when they look at my answers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![The Login Bar at SuperUser][2]&#xD;&#xA;![Display of my User Info on a question][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/2523/evilchookie&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3592/3766394512_7ddfd75b6b_o.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2524/3766394366_aff2ce9d32_o.jpg" />
  <row Id="662" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="367" RevisionGUID="fd5bd6b5-4931-4b16-a82e-4c4cf082e23d" CreationDate="2009-07-28T16:57:05.407" UserDisplayName="EvilChookie" Text="SuperUser shows far too many badges (I wish!)" />
  <row Id="663" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="367" RevisionGUID="fd5bd6b5-4931-4b16-a82e-4c4cf082e23d" CreationDate="2009-07-28T16:57:05.407" UserDisplayName="EvilChookie" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;" />
  <row Id="664" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="367" RevisionGUID="c7eccf66-91a4-4222-a424-7bf2cd75b2ee" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:21.697" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10445/superuser-shows-far-too-many-badges-i-wish" Text="" />
  <row Id="665" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="372" RevisionGUID="a51432a0-34c8-42b3-9e3b-36ee4a66d03a" CreationDate="2009-07-28T20:09:26.133" UserDisplayName="Hilarious Comedy Pesto" Text="I fixed the answer in question for you.  The problem was that it didn't like the `^` character in the second URL.  I encoded it as `%5E`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that the editor preview doesn't appear to like the `*` in the first URL, either, but the server-side Markdown parser is fine with it." />
  <row Id="666" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="371" RevisionGUID="f05ffaee-da01-4069-965e-3655e4041693" CreationDate="2009-07-28T20:04:31.563" UserDisplayName="Jeff Martin" Text="There seems to be an issue in multiple links some how.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have 2 links in the question below&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/2389/what-is-wolfram-alpha-good-for/2705#2705&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The 2nd link is different in the source but it is displayed the same as the first link (the href not the text)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/posts/2705/edit&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    The correct answer is: To answer every question your precocious 6- 11 year old has.  When he asks what the largest moon in the solar system is. Or how many gallons of water are in the pacific ocean... Wolfram should have those answers.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    While I realize that not all the databases that will be in Wolfram Alpha are in there now it will they will be.&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    Btw the ocean question takes two queries&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    [pacific ocean area * pacific ocean average depth][1]&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    [convert 1.605x10^8 mi3 to gallons][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      [1]: http://www08.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=pacific+ocean+area+*+pacific+ocean+average+depth&#xD;&#xA;      [2]: http://www08.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=convert+1.605x10^8+mi3+to+gallons&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;" />
  <row Id="667" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="371" RevisionGUID="f05ffaee-da01-4069-965e-3655e4041693" CreationDate="2009-07-28T20:04:31.563" UserDisplayName="Jeff Martin" Text="Multiple Link issue in a Superuser question" />
  <row Id="668" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="371" RevisionGUID="f05ffaee-da01-4069-965e-3655e4041693" CreationDate="2009-07-28T20:04:31.563" UserDisplayName="Jeff Martin" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;markdown&gt;" />
  <row Id="669" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="371" RevisionGUID="863a1ff3-b752-427a-9a4b-0b84d8d5d0fb" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:22.537" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10532/multiple-link-issue-in-a-superuser-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="670" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="374" RevisionGUID="f335722f-7a0c-4ce4-99bc-b930f9e50a22" CreationDate="2009-08-01T15:58:40.197" Text="It's a bug in Chrome, not us" />
  <row Id="671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="375" RevisionGUID="028470bb-9d62-40c8-9a4d-78844ce71bfb" CreationDate="2009-09-12T18:35:06.670" UserDisplayName="Isaac Waller" Text="This is not a bug in Chrome - I get it too, in Safari 4!" />
  <row Id="672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="373" RevisionGUID="a86aed03-0530-4081-817b-2c0a41ce3303" CreationDate="2009-07-29T15:21:53.313" UserDisplayName="Dillie-O" Text="I just got done posting an answer (to [this][1] question) in SuperUser and noticed that one of the tags seems to have lost its edge in the image:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure if that is related to the length of the tag itself or maybe just a rendering issue. I found this in Chrome. It didn't duplicate itself in IE, but I'm also noticing that IE renders &quot;boxed&quot; tages and Chrome is displaying rounded edges.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/15090&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://dillieodigital.net/SUTagBug.png" />
  <row Id="673" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="373" RevisionGUID="a86aed03-0530-4081-817b-2c0a41ce3303" CreationDate="2009-07-29T15:21:53.313" UserDisplayName="Dillie-O" Text="SuperUser tag image truncated" />
  <row Id="674" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="373" RevisionGUID="a86aed03-0530-4081-817b-2c0a41ce3303" CreationDate="2009-07-29T15:21:53.313" UserDisplayName="Dillie-O" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-declined&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="675" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="373" RevisionGUID="be15365d-d280-4491-bfff-cb347aa36f58" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:22.807" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10727/superuser-tag-image-truncated" Text="" />
  <row Id="676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="377" RevisionGUID="3328840b-a972-43ff-beaa-4bc395b6ce0d" CreationDate="2009-07-30T11:20:03.233" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="Does this mean I'm no longer to link to HowTo Geek articles as an answer, because it would violate his &quot;copyright&quot;?" />
  <row Id="677" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="378" RevisionGUID="906cb184-b2f0-4663-9086-4780b73c3d6d" CreationDate="2009-07-30T11:58:47.447" UserDisplayName="MicTech" Text="[How-To Geek and Stack Overflow][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/howtogeek-and-stack-overflow/" />
  <row Id="678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="379" RevisionGUID="3833a460-d6ec-49e1-b18e-62fbfba89c4a" CreationDate="2009-07-30T16:12:07.040" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="While I'm enthusiastic about this partnership (though I'm not sure what it will be, apart from The How-To Geek becoming a moderator on SU), I don't think that howtogeek.com should be placed in the footer inline with the rest of the trilogy &amp; Meta, since it's not a sister site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps another line could be added - something like &quot;league of justice&quot; that has woot.com and howtogeek.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[![better footer 2 - now with more better!][1]][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://modos.org/betterfooter2.png" />
  <row Id="679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="380" RevisionGUID="52e9e5e7-f1eb-4de1-a0a0-73fbf14ad26f" CreationDate="2010-02-05T16:31:25.883" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="While the original idea of having [The How-To Geek][1] as a moderator on SU was (and still is) a really good one, the truth of the matter is he's been almost completely inactive for quite some time. Looking at his profile, it shows that his last comment was in December, his last answer in November, but he had stopped being active long before that, ever since the beginning of October (4 months ago).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This poses a real problem. It meant SU was in reality one moderator short (this has been fixed through the appointment of Troggy and Ivo) during all that time. Also, the link on the footer of the page should not really be there, at least not inline with the rest of the trilogy sites. There's no real, practical reason for its existence there, sadly. I don't think it helps either the Trilogy or his site since there's no cross-promotion between the sites other than those static links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/4102?tab=activity#tab-top" />
  <row Id="680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="376" RevisionGUID="19f515ec-052d-473c-922b-28579be3fe5f" CreationDate="2009-07-30T10:20:16.247" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Noticed that [How-To Geek is one of the new moderators][1] helping make the pool of not a real question sadness that is SuperUser not so disgusting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And noted too that the footer of the S(O|F|U) includes the link to [How-To Geek][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this mean that the Enthusiast badge on SuperUser, [which still mentions ServerFault][3], might be sponsored by How-To Geek?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note the new look of the footer now**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![http://imgur.com/HJbJ1.png][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Better attempt to right a proper placing than having Meta banished to the end as it was previously. (Tried to click on the icons, nothing!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Now over at HowToGeek**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They finally linked back!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![http://imgur.com/cWf32.png][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/4102/the-how-to-geek&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.howtogeek.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/badges/39/woot-enthusiast&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://imgur.com/HJbJ1.png&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://imgur.com/cWf32.png&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="681" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="376" RevisionGUID="19f515ec-052d-473c-922b-28579be3fe5f" CreationDate="2009-07-30T10:20:16.247" UserDisplayName="random" Text="How-To Geek at SuperUser - New moderator, footer link" />
  <row Id="682" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="376" RevisionGUID="19f515ec-052d-473c-922b-28579be3fe5f" CreationDate="2009-07-30T10:20:16.247" UserDisplayName="random" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;howtogeek&gt;" />
  <row Id="683" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="376" RevisionGUID="015a9b46-db55-4b6a-a0d8-cf8e3579a5f6" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:23.030" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10938/how-to-geek-at-superuser-new-moderator-footer-link" Text="" />
  <row Id="684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="382" RevisionGUID="da2c562b-272c-4b78-b0d5-7e420e796e93" CreationDate="2009-07-30T11:03:28.797" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="BSOD for brevity sake. Maybe allow title values for acronyms/abbreviations? You mouse over, and up pops &quot;Blue Screen of Death.&quot;" />
  <row Id="685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="381" RevisionGUID="937a7178-7b31-4ace-83a1-ba916c9c3314" CreationDate="2009-07-30T10:57:30.167" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Tags, so many, so fruitful, so plentiful and so raging with identity issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Take in this case at Super User, the dreaded Blue Screen of **Death**. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is it [&lt;kbd&gt;BSOD&lt;/kbd&gt;][2]? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or is it just [&lt;kbd&gt;bluescreen&lt;/kbd&gt;][3] because you're mates and are on a first name basis?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Who shall live on and who shall die and be subsumed into the reigning one? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Gabriel Law? Connor MacLeod?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/bsod&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/bluescreen" />
  <row Id="686" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="381" RevisionGUID="937a7178-7b31-4ace-83a1-ba916c9c3314" CreationDate="2009-07-30T10:57:30.167" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Blue Screen of Death dupe derp at Super User" />
  <row Id="687" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="381" RevisionGUID="937a7178-7b31-4ace-83a1-ba916c9c3314" CreationDate="2009-07-30T10:57:30.167" UserDisplayName="random" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="688" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="381" RevisionGUID="0d324c3f-b3ae-470d-a52a-15b4ae11ae95" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:24.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10941/blue-screen-of-death-dupe-derp-at-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="384" RevisionGUID="07eb1b4e-5fae-4642-997d-1f7b71d76f22" CreationDate="2009-07-31T22:02:45.980" UserDisplayName="Treb" Text="Yes, definitely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The big question is, which of the two alternatives to use. I prefer [NAS], because it's shorter; and I would not search for [network-attached-storage] when it's so much easier to just type three letters. &#xD;&#xA;But others might disagree with me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, the community needs people who put effort into keeping the tag system clean. It does not organise by itself, unfortunately..." />
  <row Id="690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="385" RevisionGUID="73ce386d-e872-45cf-a679-8724c40167fe" CreationDate="2009-08-03T23:27:47.437" UserDisplayName="smok1" Text="NAS may be similar to Serverfault users, but I think it may be hard to unserstand for SU useres, who are just &quot;typical users on steroids&quot;. How many sysadmins will know what RTTI, BDE or IBX is? These are acronyms from Delphi world, and may be not understood by people from outside SO-world (ie: not developers). Since every domain has got it's own acronyms, I do not think we should present users with unfamiliar acronyms.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="383" RevisionGUID="4095a9f2-fcc0-410f-a3a5-c1ad0bb01f28" CreationDate="2009-07-31T21:38:36.093" UserDisplayName="Bob King" Text="I've asked a couple questions on SuperUser that I originally tagged with [[nas]][1]. There were a few other questions out there with that tag already. After awhile, one of my questions got the [[network-attached-storage]][2] tag added. It looks like three of the questions in [network-attached-storage] are already tagged as [nas]. Should we try to standardize on one to prevent some fragmentation?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/nas&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/network-attached-storage&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: I retagged the five items:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/network-attached-storage" />
  <row Id="692" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="383" RevisionGUID="4095a9f2-fcc0-410f-a3a5-c1ad0bb01f28" CreationDate="2009-07-31T21:38:36.093" UserDisplayName="Bob King" Text="SuperUser tags: [nas] vs [network-attached-storage]" />
  <row Id="693" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="383" RevisionGUID="4095a9f2-fcc0-410f-a3a5-c1ad0bb01f28" CreationDate="2009-07-31T21:38:36.093" UserDisplayName="Bob King" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="694" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="383" RevisionGUID="dd45d1b2-cff0-4ffe-8d0e-4c6852924bb5" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:24.600" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11543/superuser-tags-nas-vs-network-attached-storage" Text="" />
  <row Id="695" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="387" RevisionGUID="dff8dcfc-8f60-4d08-8641-ce7b51aad75e" CreationDate="2009-09-04T05:10:16.903" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Feels the same over in Server Fault where they have no background, but a chunky dotted border to the left of the bio section. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That is, the alignment looks the same across the SOFU platter with or without the `background-color` or the `border` set." />
  <row Id="696" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="386" RevisionGUID="b155cec3-204c-450e-b28f-3344eaf75900" CreationDate="2009-08-03T00:06:54.613" UserDisplayName="Macha" Text="On SO, and MSO, on a user's profile, the section on the right used for the bio has a grey background.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On SU, it does not. The text is just on the same white background as the rest of the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yet it still has the same padding as SO/MSO, causing it to look out of place because it is (seemingly without reason) aligned almost, but not quite, with the `edit | new login` on your own profile.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could a background be put on this, or the text shifted up so it lines up completely?" />
  <row Id="697" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="386" RevisionGUID="b155cec3-204c-450e-b28f-3344eaf75900" CreationDate="2009-08-03T00:06:54.613" UserDisplayName="Macha" Text="Super User bio background" />
  <row Id="698" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="386" RevisionGUID="b155cec3-204c-450e-b28f-3344eaf75900" CreationDate="2009-08-03T00:06:54.613" UserDisplayName="Macha" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;style&gt;" />
  <row Id="699" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="386" RevisionGUID="a8cff070-8d72-4fa7-b1c6-d7d88a08ec79" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:58:59.647" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11830/super-user-bio-background" Text="" />
  <row Id="700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="389" RevisionGUID="002020df-5c3c-48d0-b46f-f27a18a07bfb" CreationDate="2009-08-03T18:58:55.600" UserDisplayName="Geoffrey Chetwood" Text="Not sure what the thinking was here, but I would be much happier if this were an integer user preference." />
  <row Id="701" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="390" RevisionGUID="59f75925-8a33-486c-9cf4-ed21d93c77b4" CreationDate="2009-08-03T19:00:47.233" UserDisplayName="Brad Gilbert" Text="&lt;strike&gt;That may be due to the fact, that the question is marked Community Wiki.&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a correlation between them being marked Community Wiki, it's just not what I thought.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions with more than 15 answers become Community Wiki, and Questions with more than 15 answers start having the comments hidden. You can force a question into CW, but it will still show the comments." />
  <row Id="702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="391" RevisionGUID="e2af1eff-bf13-4077-8a60-2f57ab02660f" CreationDate="2009-08-03T19:06:15.723" UserDisplayName="Jonik" Text="&gt; This is different from SO and MSO. Is this a bug, or the desired behavior? If this is by design, why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is &lt;s&gt;*not*&lt;/s&gt; *just a little* different from SO and the other sites, and it only happens in questions that have lots of answers &lt;s&gt;(or are CW?)&lt;/s&gt;. ([Example SU question where comments are not hidden][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: A [relevant blog post][2] from April 2009 says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; On questions with &gt;30 answers, only&#xD;&#xA;&gt; comments of +1 or higher will be shown&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;...but this does *not* seem to be the case exactly, at least no longer, because in your example there were slightly less than 30 answers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But whatever the exact condition that triggers this mode, I personally find this little feature very well thought out ([as I commented back then][3]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit2**: It seems [Shog9's answer][4] has all the details &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/17711/physical-button-to-run-scripts-on-a-windows-machine/17727#17727&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/04/comments-top-n-shown/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/04/comments-top-n-shown/#comment-20582&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11948/why-does-superuser-hide-comments-without-upvotes-even-if-there-are-no-other-comm/11952#11952" />
  <row Id="703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="392" RevisionGUID="bdce642e-4d2a-460d-be5f-b3aaa3916bd7" CreationDate="2009-08-03T19:10:48.910" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="Once there are more than *threshold* answers, all non-upvoted comments are hidden. This is done to save space, and happens across all sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On SU, the threshhold is 15, vs 30 on other sites. This was done in response to the huge number of non-questions on SU... So you're probably more apt to notice it there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that this is also the threshold for forcing a question into CW mode, though questions can be marked CW without triggering the auto-hiding of comments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Evidence:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [A non-CW question with 15 answers: comments visible][1]&#xD;&#xA;* [A CW question with 15 answers: comments visible][2]&#xD;&#xA;* [A CW question with 16 answers: comments hidden][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###See also: [Reduce community wiki force threshold to &lt;= 15 answers on superuser?][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/2769/now-that-ms-money-is-going-away-what-are-the-best-competitive-options&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/90/what-is-your-favourite-replacement-of-windows-exporer-for-managing-files-and-such&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/3446/what-are-the-must-listen-to-general-technology-podcasts&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6814/reduce-community-wiki-force-threshold-to-15-answers-on-superuser" />
  <row Id="704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="388" RevisionGUID="28840a12-8f83-40d9-bcee-01de8765fa1f" CreationDate="2009-08-03T18:57:08.490" UserDisplayName="Kip" Text="I've noticed on SuperUser that comments without upvotes are hidden by default, even if there are no other comments with upvotes.  This is different from SO and MSO.  Is this a bug, or the desired behavior?  If this is by design, why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a screenshot from &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/1599/what-is-the-worst-depiction-of-computer-use-in-a-movie/1645#1645&quot;&gt;this question&lt;/a&gt;, where all comments are hidden (because they have no upvotes):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;img src=&quot;http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/5158/sucomments.png&quot; /&gt;" />
  <row Id="705" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="388" RevisionGUID="28840a12-8f83-40d9-bcee-01de8765fa1f" CreationDate="2009-08-03T18:57:08.490" UserDisplayName="Kip" Text="Why does SuperUser hide comments without upvotes, even if there are no other comments?" />
  <row Id="706" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="388" RevisionGUID="28840a12-8f83-40d9-bcee-01de8765fa1f" CreationDate="2009-08-03T18:57:08.490" UserDisplayName="Kip" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="707" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="388" RevisionGUID="710eaefb-8604-416e-b3f0-b2ca2d5c219e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:00.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11948/why-does-superuser-hide-comments-without-upvotes-even-if-there-are-no-other-comm" Text="" />
  <row Id="708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="394" RevisionGUID="579a0c25-d759-4368-8446-4cf53fbbbcd6" CreationDate="2009-08-03T20:29:32.170" UserDisplayName="Marc Gravell" Text="&quot;Windows backup&quot; seems to be a pretty specific term; I'm not sure there is a need to make it less specific?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also - the tools don't allow us to split, so the 39 would have to be handled manually, **even if** this was desirable (I'm not convinced, personally; I think of &quot;windows backup&quot; as the MS tools; &quot;backup&quot; and/or &quot;windows&quot; could mean any product...)" />
  <row Id="709" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="393" RevisionGUID="770bbde2-7e1b-4d6b-966a-8cee49c314d8" CreationDate="2009-08-03T20:18:37.420" UserDisplayName="stukelly" Text="Can you retag superuser posts with the [windows-backup][1] tag with windows and backup tags?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Windows - 435&#xD;&#xA; - Backup - 39&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think this would make searching and using the interesting/ignored tags easier.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows-backup" />
  <row Id="710" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="393" RevisionGUID="770bbde2-7e1b-4d6b-966a-8cee49c314d8" CreationDate="2009-08-03T20:18:37.420" UserDisplayName="stukelly" Text="Retag Request: [windows-backup] -&gt; [windows] &amp; [backup]" />
  <row Id="711" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="393" RevisionGUID="770bbde2-7e1b-4d6b-966a-8cee49c314d8" CreationDate="2009-08-03T20:18:37.420" UserDisplayName="stukelly" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-declined&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="712" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="393" RevisionGUID="f71ad6fd-5649-4484-9f8d-4344fb4bb8b4" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:00.707" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11985/retag-request-windows-backup-windows-backup" Text="" />
  <row Id="713" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="395" RevisionGUID="0a06f73b-87e9-4685-a64b-f061caaa365a" CreationDate="2009-08-05T17:37:51.947" UserDisplayName="Grant" Text="The links on large text (either followed or unfollowed) look fine, but the small link text for a followed link is a bit bright for a white background. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have a suggestion for a replacement color (could a followed link be text-decorated in some other way?) but light-light-blue small text on a white background is difficult to read." />
  <row Id="714" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="395" RevisionGUID="0a06f73b-87e9-4685-a64b-f061caaa365a" CreationDate="2009-08-05T17:37:51.947" UserDisplayName="Grant" Text="Can we darken the followed links on superuser just a smidgen?" />
  <row Id="715" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="395" RevisionGUID="0a06f73b-87e9-4685-a64b-f061caaa365a" CreationDate="2009-08-05T17:37:51.947" UserDisplayName="Grant" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;color&gt;" />
  <row Id="716" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="395" RevisionGUID="e9acd36d-f04a-4e4b-ad23-dab6535987f4" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:00.913" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/12673/can-we-darken-the-followed-links-on-superuser-just-a-smidgen" Text="" />
  <row Id="717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="397" RevisionGUID="e91341ba-5e5a-4821-b391-6159894b6250" CreationDate="2009-08-05T18:21:28.800" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="SuperUser is in closed beta only so far as that it is closed to people who can't check the blog to find the password to it or ask someone for the password that's already in. This is a **really** **really** easy barrier of entry to overcome." />
  <row Id="718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="398" RevisionGUID="f2b59fdd-b837-4ac1-96e7-e4b891473bce" CreationDate="2009-08-05T18:23:04.663" UserDisplayName="Hilarious Comedy Pesto" Text="First of all, regardless of whether SU exists or not, your question wasn't suitable for SO.  Luckily for you, SU *does* exist, so your question doesn't just get closed as not programming related and deleted in short order.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, SU's password is not a big secret by any stretch.  Look, I'll post [a link to it][1].  And even if it *were*, it won't always be in beta.  Eventually someone else will have the same question (probably you if you couldn't get into the beta), and need that same answer.  Luckily, it will already exist on SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/super-user-semi-private-beta-begins/" />
  <row Id="719" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="399" RevisionGUID="9ad7ed55-c8ba-4fd1-8efc-3bae7ae13918" CreationDate="2009-08-05T18:35:43.827" UserDisplayName="perbert" Text="Besides, look at the related links of this question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Related&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - wrongly tagged “belongs-on-superuser”?&#xD;&#xA; - How to access superuser.com?&#xD;&#xA; - Moving to super user while it’s still on beta?&#xD;&#xA; - Is the superuser beta invite-only?&#xD;&#xA; - Change the superuser.com link in the footer to say “(private beta)” until it’s open to all.&#xD;&#xA; - Do we really need a beta period for SuperUser?&#xD;&#xA; - When Super User Will Be Open&#xD;&#xA; - Serverfault down? How to get into superuser beta?" />
  <row Id="720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="400" RevisionGUID="ce8e6511-a4f3-4cb3-95fb-841b1bc20fe2" CreationDate="2009-08-05T18:47:18.170" UserDisplayName="James McMahon" Text="I think you do have a point. While the password is easy to find *if you know where to look*, a lot of people don't keep up with the SO blog.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However it either move it to a beta site where the questioner **may not** be able to access it, or, as Pesto pointed out, delete it from SO, in which case **no one** will be able to access it." />
  <row Id="721" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="401" RevisionGUID="3b39b306-dc13-46ff-8ad2-21646a5e10e2" CreationDate="2009-08-05T18:51:02.033" UserDisplayName="bdonlan" Text="I really think the original submitter should be given the beta password somehow. Perhaps have links from migrated questions pass through an intermediate page that sets the password cookie for the user (optionally with a top bar notice)." />
  <row Id="722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="396" RevisionGUID="99786d5d-78a6-40f2-8fbd-d6450c72ca07" CreationDate="2009-08-05T18:14:22.887" UserDisplayName="Moo" Text="I've noticed this for a while, especially on StackOverflow - someone will ask a desktop/enduser related question and very quickly the question will get closed with a comment/resolution of 'Moved to SuperUser.com'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example - http://serverfault.com/questions/50122/107mb-s-network-file-copying-slowed-to-16-5mb-s-playing-local-media-files-wh&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whats the point in that?  SuperUser.com is in closed beta - I get a link to the SU question, but I cannot access it.  What happens with regard to the author?  Do they get an automated invite to SU?  Or do they simply lose access to their question?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People seem to be using SU as though it is open to the public, and moving stuff to it.  Sure, it might belong there, but if we cannot access it then why?" />
  <row Id="723" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="396" RevisionGUID="99786d5d-78a6-40f2-8fbd-d6450c72ca07" CreationDate="2009-08-05T18:14:22.887" UserDisplayName="Moo" Text="&quot;Moving to superuser&quot; closure of threads" />
  <row Id="724" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="396" RevisionGUID="99786d5d-78a6-40f2-8fbd-d6450c72ca07" CreationDate="2009-08-05T18:14:22.887" UserDisplayName="Moo" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="725" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="396" RevisionGUID="83ebb039-20b8-4f17-aa51-f23bdd8810a6" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:01.113" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/12687/moving-to-superuser-closure-of-threads" Text="" />
  <row Id="726" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="403" RevisionGUID="89a557fa-fd55-436c-97ef-6cd0cb67082d" CreationDate="2009-08-06T08:34:52.233" UserDisplayName="Kent Fredric" Text="Edits in quick succession &quot;squash&quot; history-wise. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/1159/to-give-each-edit-own-version-history-closed" />
  <row Id="727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="402" RevisionGUID="192241e6-0e61-423f-9515-7f612334df1f" CreationDate="2009-08-06T08:32:38.480" UserDisplayName="Nik Reiman" Text="I experienced a bit of really weird behavior on superuser this morning.  I created a [new ticket][1], and in that ticket I had made two links.  The first link I added after typing some stuff, and I made it by selecting some text in the editor, pressing ctrl+l, pasting my link in there, then hitting ok.  It worked fine, and the text in the preview was correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I submitted the ticket, the entire block of text between my first and second link became part of the hyperlink.  When I went to edit the post, the actual markup looked to be ok, so I removed the first link from my post.  After I saved my edits, there was no history of the previous version to be found!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Edit*: Ok, I guess that there is an explanation for that behavior, as Kent points out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I realize this sounds very crazy and probably hard to reproduce.  It would be nice if we had some type of sandbox to experiment around in without having to worry about generating a bunch of junk questions on the site, or does such a thing already exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FWIW I'm using chrome on vista.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/18928" />
  <row Id="728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="402" RevisionGUID="192241e6-0e61-423f-9515-7f612334df1f" CreationDate="2009-08-06T08:32:38.480" UserDisplayName="Nik Reiman" Text="Possible bug in inserting link over selected text" />
  <row Id="729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="402" RevisionGUID="192241e6-0e61-423f-9515-7f612334df1f" CreationDate="2009-08-06T08:32:38.480" UserDisplayName="Nik Reiman" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;revisions&gt;" />
  <row Id="730" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="402" RevisionGUID="3d58be23-ce9b-44c9-aa2f-3f4effd7432c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:02.480" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/12770/possible-bug-in-inserting-link-over-selected-text" Text="" />
  <row Id="731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="405" RevisionGUID="bf48a8e6-3464-4bc5-88bb-2816e93583f7" CreationDate="2009-08-06T12:19:26.107" UserDisplayName="Hilarious Comedy Pesto" Text="I favor `[keyboard-shortcuts]`, too.  It's more descriptive, it contains the other terms (so it will show up in the suggestion box), and it is most frequently used.  Seems like a clear winner to me." />
  <row Id="732" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="406" RevisionGUID="946d9da2-592f-4b11-87a7-c8cfbfc7c1d1" CreationDate="2009-08-06T12:36:41.463" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="[shortcut][1] is not currently used for questions related to keyboard shortcuts.&#xD;&#xA;[One question][2] tagged [shortcuts] also refers to a different meaning for that word.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Proceed carefully...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/shortcut&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/5022/windows-how-to-create-a-shortcut-for-the-safely-remove-hardware-dialog" />
  <row Id="733" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="407" RevisionGUID="87a15701-e28f-48b4-9cf5-f2ea9225823f" CreationDate="2009-08-06T13:34:32.000" UserDisplayName="Jeff Yates" Text="I vote for separating &lt;kbd&gt;keyboard-shortcuts&lt;/kbd&gt; into &lt;kbd&gt;keyboard&lt;/kbd&gt; and &lt;kbd&gt;shortcuts&lt;/kbd&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;kbd&gt;shortcuts&lt;/kbd&gt; is a category and &lt;kbd&gt;keyboard&lt;/kbd&gt; is a subcategory. Of course, in theory, this seems the most sensible to me but in practise, it might be a pain to enforce." />
  <row Id="734" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="404" RevisionGUID="ab3bd022-2801-4188-bb26-448ac8f9ce04" CreationDate="2009-08-06T12:08:43.800" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="On superuser we have&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [keyboard-shortcuts] x 34&#xD;&#xA;    [shortcuts] x 4&#xD;&#xA;    [shortcut] x 2&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was thinking of changing the 6 ones labeled shortcuts and shortcut to keyboard-shortcuts as this would be the least work and only take a minute (retagging 4 questions). But I'm not sure. I think shortcuts is maybe better (are there other than 'keyboard-' shortcuts?).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I'm asking the community... how should this be retagged?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: Apparently (thanks Shog9) there is a difference in meaning between 'keyboard-shortcut' and 'shortcut' tout-court (the latter being e.g. a shorthand for instance to type into the Firefox address bar). So the only problem that remains now: should we take 'shortcut' or 'shortcuts' for that last meaning? [This question][1] doesn't give a decisive answer towards tags being plural or singular.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Another Edit**: Ok, I've updated the tags, so now there's only 'keyboard-shortcuts' and 'shortcuts'. But I like Jeff Yates' idea of separating 'keyboard-shortcuts' in 'keyboard' and 'shortcuts'. Can this be done with the moderator tools?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6752/merge-singular-and-plural-tags" />
  <row Id="735" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="404" RevisionGUID="ab3bd022-2801-4188-bb26-448ac8f9ce04" CreationDate="2009-08-06T12:08:43.800" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="merge [shortcut], [shortcuts] and [keyboard-shortcuts] on superuser" />
  <row Id="736" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="404" RevisionGUID="ab3bd022-2801-4188-bb26-448ac8f9ce04" CreationDate="2009-08-06T12:08:43.800" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="737" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="404" RevisionGUID="7b80e8a5-ef33-42c9-b222-26a3f46ee520" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:02.837" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/12809/merge-shortcut-shortcuts-and-keyboard-shortcuts-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="409" RevisionGUID="232c7394-e1ac-4b3a-a6b9-a88d1bf215f8" CreationDate="2009-08-06T23:51:24.233" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Perhaps it should suggest the correct grammar based on the number of attempted tags instead of just assuming it is the multiple." />
  <row Id="739" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="410" RevisionGUID="e1e67ab6-b59e-413c-a1bf-2604460f53c7" CreationDate="2009-08-12T23:50:29.630" Text="Duplicate, many times over." />
  <row Id="740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="408" RevisionGUID="e53fd423-dd3a-4d7e-af99-f05a62a9fbeb" CreationDate="2009-08-06T23:35:05.983" UserDisplayName="Christopher Done" Text="Superuser says to me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Oops! Your question couldn't be&#xD;&#xA;&gt; submitted because:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     * new users can't create tags; 'cores' are new tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shouldn't this say &quot;'cores' is a new tag&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just a suggestion." />
  <row Id="741" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="408" RevisionGUID="e53fd423-dd3a-4d7e-af99-f05a62a9fbeb" CreationDate="2009-08-06T23:35:05.983" UserDisplayName="Christopher Done" Text="Superuser's software says “'cores' are new tags” instead of “'cores' is a new tag” -- fixable?" />
  <row Id="742" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="408" RevisionGUID="e53fd423-dd3a-4d7e-af99-f05a62a9fbeb" CreationDate="2009-08-06T23:35:05.983" UserDisplayName="Christopher Done" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;tag-creation&gt;" />
  <row Id="743" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="408" RevisionGUID="550fcbe9-462a-4684-817c-fd877b165e67" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:03.170" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/12990/superusers-software-says-cores-are-new-tags-instead-of-cores-is-a-new-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="412" RevisionGUID="5fc3c4ba-0aea-4025-8341-b4fc8b4e3b71" CreationDate="2009-08-08T06:17:23.703" UserDisplayName="random" Text="The examples you've thrown up sound like good questions to have at SU. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There're are a few questions like that already on there and they're taken to warmly. Even solved in some cases.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions about Paint.NET are no more specific than [questions about Photoshop][1] or [a Mac mini][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/photoshop&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/mac-mini" />
  <row Id="745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="413" RevisionGUID="db56960b-a624-45bf-b166-c7524493b71a" CreationDate="2009-08-08T06:34:50.487" UserDisplayName="lexu" Text="As a reader of SuperUser I might not be interested in Paint.net today. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But tomorrow I might be using it and scratching my head because of a question you answered here as &quot;superuser&quot; for Paint.net.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd say: go ahead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="414" RevisionGUID="04459d33-d415-4fc8-95b4-cfea23d34d1e" CreationDate="2009-08-08T08:49:48.717" UserDisplayName="ire_and_curses" Text="This seems no different to me than asking about iphone-sdk or sql-server-2007 on Stack Overflow. These are specific, useful questions to some user subsets. And the rest can just ignore them via tags." />
  <row Id="747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="415" RevisionGUID="c73210b3-1f6b-44f4-bebc-64c938f8abdb" CreationDate="2009-08-08T13:36:53.700" UserDisplayName="squillman" Text="I was thinking of using SU to post similar style questions about Photoshop, Illustrator, GIMP and Inkscape.  SU is for computer related Q&amp;A that are not 1) programming or 2) sysadmin and as such is seems perfectly appropriate to post specific software questions there.  Besides, the community will certainly let you know if it finds your question inappropriate!" />
  <row Id="748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="416" RevisionGUID="1ebb1cc7-9eba-47a7-b424-188a1c6f4fd7" CreationDate="2009-08-09T09:41:50.320" Text="&gt; Lately I've become somewhat of a 'power user' of Paint.NET.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think &quot;power user&quot; is the right frame of mind here -- is it an interesting question for other &quot;super users&quot;?" />
  <row Id="749" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="411" RevisionGUID="01a070a3-7aec-488b-b360-89f1ff547a81" CreationDate="2009-08-08T05:57:12.463" UserDisplayName="Ryan" Text="How open should SuperUser be to questions that are very specific to a particular piece of software?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Example: Lately I've become somewhat of a 'power user' of Paint.NET. It's a fantastic piece of software that does a real service to the community. I'd like to see/ask questions like&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - How do I do a wood grain texture in paint.net?&#xD;&#xA; - How do I do drop shadows in paint.net?&#xD;&#xA; - How can I emulate layer masks in paint.net?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;etc. etc. etc. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sure that other folks can fill in their favorite app du jour for 'paint.net', but I'm curious to see whether folks think that questions like this add or subtract from SuperUser. Is this cruft or pie, as it were?" />
  <row Id="750" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="411" RevisionGUID="01a070a3-7aec-488b-b360-89f1ff547a81" CreationDate="2009-08-08T05:57:12.463" UserDisplayName="Ryan" Text="Asking about specific software on SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="751" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="411" RevisionGUID="01a070a3-7aec-488b-b360-89f1ff547a81" CreationDate="2009-08-08T05:57:12.463" UserDisplayName="Ryan" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;general-discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="752" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="411" RevisionGUID="285fb8eb-2986-4efc-b928-5ddca872d4c0" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:03.393" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/13224/asking-about-specific-software-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="418" RevisionGUID="b8eccf47-02cb-4483-89d2-fe75af310941" CreationDate="2009-08-09T09:34:32.753" UserDisplayName="Johannes Rössel" Text="I'd say yes, since phones, especially smartphones nowadays, are essentially general-purpose computers and are subject to many of the same problems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;***Edit by Gnoupi***: since this post, [the situation has changed][1]. The [FAQ][2] now clearly states that you should not ask questions about *&quot;electronic devices, media players, cell phones or smart phones, except insofar as they interface with your computer&quot;*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions about electronic devices will be welcomed on this [Area 51 proposal site][3], when it will launch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/35733/update-the-superuser-faq&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/faq&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/614/electronic-gadgets" />
  <row Id="754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="419" RevisionGUID="80224e99-4cea-4bac-8e42-d34b5cb86614" CreationDate="2009-08-09T09:39:22.617" Text="Only for extra-computery phones, and even then, it's best if the question is at least related to computer hardware or software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fex: &quot;I want to transfer PDF files from my **COMPUTER** to the iPhone and read them on the iPhone at my leisure. How do I do that?&quot;" />
  <row Id="755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="420" RevisionGUID="bdc4ab44-5ada-4014-a783-124ac2ff5720" CreationDate="2010-07-06T21:00:27.170" UserDisplayName="jaydles" Text="No, Superuser won't allow them unless the problem also involves a &quot;real&quot; computer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'd have to support one of these:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Disclosure:  these are referral links)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**This is for general gadgets and gizmos:**&#xD;&#xA;http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/614/electronic-gadgets?referrer=lu78is-6UwU1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**This one's for all things Apple, if you happen to mean an iphone:**&#xD;&#xA;http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/151/apple?referrer=LvSWwLbXk641&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The former is a lot closer to a beta launch." />
  <row Id="756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="417" RevisionGUID="98886b3f-3f68-4446-90cc-5ad863f31646" CreationDate="2009-08-09T09:23:40.217" UserDisplayName="Nick Kavadias" Text="The [Super User FAQ](http://superuser.com/faq) states that [superuser.com](http://www.superuser.com/) is for asking questions related to computer hardware and software.&#xD;&#xA;Is asking iPhone or android questions allowed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**  Maybe the real question is: do we consider an android phone or an iPhone a computer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My [question][1] has been asked!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;__Edit 2:__  &#xD;&#xA;As a result of this and similar questions, the FAQ has been updated to read &quot;and it is __not about__ ... electronic devices, media players, cell phones or smart phones, except insofar as they interface with your computer&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/20201/what-is-the-best-android-phone-available-on-the-market" />
  <row Id="757" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="417" RevisionGUID="98886b3f-3f68-4446-90cc-5ad863f31646" CreationDate="2009-08-09T09:23:40.217" UserDisplayName="Nick Kavadias" Text="Are smartphone questions permitted on Super User?" />
  <row Id="758" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="417" RevisionGUID="98886b3f-3f68-4446-90cc-5ad863f31646" CreationDate="2009-08-09T09:23:40.217" UserDisplayName="Nick Kavadias" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="759" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="417" RevisionGUID="0106ba1a-5176-49c0-92fb-1cdc32b07efa" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:03.780" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/13289/are-smartphone-questions-permitted-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="442" RevisionGUID="d1e7d3a7-eea6-4d03-81e5-526f6dbfb307" CreationDate="2009-08-14T04:38:33.370" Text="Troggy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/users/2553/troggy" />
  <row Id="784" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="442" RevisionGUID="d1e7d3a7-eea6-4d03-81e5-526f6dbfb307" CreationDate="2009-08-14T04:38:33.370" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="785" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="443" RevisionGUID="3e8c4888-725c-4378-9e96-d364cb80bde1" CreationDate="2009-08-14T04:38:44.773" Text="Ivo&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/users/1548/ivo" />
  <row Id="786" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="443" RevisionGUID="3e8c4888-725c-4378-9e96-d364cb80bde1" CreationDate="2009-08-14T04:38:44.773" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="444" RevisionGUID="8258c433-7bf8-4f2e-973a-174ff5be0a2a" CreationDate="2009-08-14T04:38:58.593" Text="Diago&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/users/3981/diago" />
  <row Id="788" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="444" RevisionGUID="8258c433-7bf8-4f2e-973a-174ff5be0a2a" CreationDate="2009-08-14T04:38:58.593" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="441" RevisionGUID="fc584df8-9a3a-4e1d-9c42-9c1879e885b2" CreationDate="2009-08-14T04:38:22.010" Text="As the Super User semi-private beta comes to an end this coming Tuesday, we need to elect a final community moderator for the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, we’re looking for a good moderator; someone who is above all&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- patient and fair&#xD;&#xA;- leads by example&#xD;&#xA;- shows respect for their fellow users in their actions and words &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've taken an informal poll from all the SU mods, and we have these three nominees. Please examine the candidates’ user pages to get a sense of what kind of moderator they might make.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't like poll questions but I am making an exception in this case on meta. &lt;s&gt;Question is closed to prevent any new answers from being added.&lt;/s&gt; The [closed] designation was too intimidating, I think, so I removed it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Please don't add any new answers.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Please vote for the candidate you think would make the best Super User moderator**" />
  <row Id="790" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="441" RevisionGUID="fc584df8-9a3a-4e1d-9c42-9c1879e885b2" CreationDate="2009-08-14T04:38:22.010" Text="Vote for Super User Moderator [poll]" />
  <row Id="791" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="441" RevisionGUID="fc584df8-9a3a-4e1d-9c42-9c1879e885b2" CreationDate="2009-08-14T04:38:22.010" Text="&lt;moderators&gt;&lt;poll&gt;&lt;moderator-nomination&gt;" />
  <row Id="792" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="441" RevisionGUID="fc584df8-9a3a-4e1d-9c42-9c1879e885b2" CreationDate="2009-08-14T04:38:22.010" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="793" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="441" RevisionGUID="340a0d6d-eb6c-46fa-8d55-760c4fd84c91" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:07.417" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/14417/vote-for-super-user-moderator-poll" Text="" />
  <row Id="794" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="446" RevisionGUID="a8fec966-950f-4fb8-a752-01656374f1f4" CreationDate="2009-08-14T10:07:56.213" UserDisplayName="GraemeF" Text="Same on SO proper." />
  <row Id="795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="447" RevisionGUID="6d66b349-1cbc-4586-a5f0-551d48e69118" CreationDate="2009-08-14T15:06:39.900" UserDisplayName="Brad Gilbert" Text="It appears as if it is tied to the &quot;Have you considered accepting an answer or starting a bounty for this question?&quot; string.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That string probably has &quot;\n&quot; at the end." />
  <row Id="796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="445" RevisionGUID="fdec6867-adeb-4163-8127-3fcb3d1b2e04" CreationDate="2009-08-14T09:55:41.110" UserDisplayName="Prashant" Text="I noticed that **&quot;\n&quot;** is printed in superuser.com listing on user profile page. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that &quot;\n&quot; is printed for the questions who have **&quot;Have you considered accepting an answer or starting a bounty for this question?&quot;** text.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know where to report bug for superuser, so I am just reporting it here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Screenshot**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2511/3820318410_caa0fc9e1f_o.jpg" />
  <row Id="797" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="445" RevisionGUID="fdec6867-adeb-4163-8127-3fcb3d1b2e04" CreationDate="2009-08-14T09:55:41.110" UserDisplayName="Prashant" Text="&quot;\n&quot; is printed in superuser.com question listing on profile page." />
  <row Id="798" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="445" RevisionGUID="fdec6867-adeb-4163-8127-3fcb3d1b2e04" CreationDate="2009-08-14T09:55:41.110" UserDisplayName="Prashant" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="799" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="445" RevisionGUID="f3354551-1220-42f2-be3f-a23f57fbc020" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:09.867" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/14437/n-is-printed-in-superuser-com-question-listing-on-profile-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="449" RevisionGUID="989d5a03-7041-43b7-a871-b3cd113b4304" CreationDate="2009-08-15T12:59:17.160" UserDisplayName="Thomas Owens" Text="Could someone have posted an answer and then deleted it? That would change the listing on the question listing, but not show up in the view over the question." />
  <row Id="801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="448" RevisionGUID="8b6555e9-3583-4dda-977c-2ceadcce52e8" CreationDate="2009-08-15T12:56:29.160" UserDisplayName="nik" Text="I find that this Superuser question,  &#xD;&#xA;[**Concatenate pdfs without losing bookmarks**][1]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- shows last-modified by &quot;`John T`&quot; when the question is listed  &#xD;&#xA;(for example [recently active `pdf` tagged questions][2]),  &#xD;&#xA;- while, the question page itself says last-modified by &quot;`EvilChookie`&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [revision page for the question][3] does not show &quot;`John T`&quot; anywhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a bug?  &#xD;&#xA;I don't understand how my cache could do something like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/23033/concatenate-pdfs-without-losing-bookmarks&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged?tagnames=pdf&amp;sort=active&amp;pagesize=30&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/revisions/23033/list" />
  <row Id="802" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="448" RevisionGUID="8b6555e9-3583-4dda-977c-2ceadcce52e8" CreationDate="2009-08-15T12:56:29.160" UserDisplayName="nik" Text="Incorrect user association to a question?" />
  <row Id="803" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="448" RevisionGUID="8b6555e9-3583-4dda-977c-2ceadcce52e8" CreationDate="2009-08-15T12:56:29.160" UserDisplayName="nik" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;" />
  <row Id="804" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="448" RevisionGUID="e848f11b-8244-447a-bacb-83a337664f2e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:10.607" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/14647/incorrect-user-association-to-a-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="805" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="451" RevisionGUID="f9ca6be9-e120-4e40-ba05-df8f945ecb51" CreationDate="2009-08-15T19:04:06.537" UserDisplayName="Jon Skeet" Text="A simpler solution would be to end with SU beta period - which is already happening, making the problem go away entirely, at least for that site. Admittedly we get into the same situation for future sites, but I'm not sure how many of those we should expect (of the same kind, rather than StackExchange sites)." />
  <row Id="806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="452" RevisionGUID="1d389edc-029c-4a60-9ea0-3fa0bba58aca" CreationDate="2009-08-15T21:18:43.020" Text="Sort of irrelevant since the beta is ending Monday at 23:59.." />
  <row Id="807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="450" RevisionGUID="8101a486-ec26-4d99-ad3d-e83dfcf41b35" CreationDate="2009-08-15T18:59:06.563" UserDisplayName="Andrew Moore" Text="A lot of people have been complaining that they can't read their questions once it's migrated to SU and while I agree that **the password is no state secret** (it's stated in the blog), most people don't have the means of looking for the password (especially not the SU population). They see **private** and then just get frustrated and leave.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think as a simple solution would be to verify if the HTTP Referrer (or Referer as misspelled in the standard) is an SO or SF question, then simply don't ask for the password. (And of course don't ask the password on subsequent visits)" />
  <row Id="808" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="450" RevisionGUID="8101a486-ec26-4d99-ad3d-e83dfcf41b35" CreationDate="2009-08-15T18:59:06.563" UserDisplayName="Andrew Moore" Text="SuperUser migrated question solution - Check HTTP Referrer" />
  <row Id="809" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="450" RevisionGUID="8101a486-ec26-4d99-ad3d-e83dfcf41b35" CreationDate="2009-08-15T18:59:06.563" UserDisplayName="Andrew Moore" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-declined&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="810" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="450" RevisionGUID="2129ccc1-b024-4096-b276-8673cc1f76ba" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:11.310" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/14720/superuser-migrated-question-solution-check-http-referrer" Text="" />
  <row Id="811" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="454" RevisionGUID="61422258-9d1b-4d57-9ba4-8bd37986a136" CreationDate="2009-08-17T16:58:32.700" UserDisplayName="Bill the Lizard" Text="These are exactly the kinds of questions that usually get closed as &quot;too localized.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See the questions [What is too localised?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7561/what-is-too-localised) and [What questions should be closed with reason “too localized”?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/4818/what-questions-should-be-closed-with-reason-too-localized)" />
  <row Id="812" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="455" RevisionGUID="0e63dd1e-3d96-49ec-ae8b-f938dc6a39e6" CreationDate="2009-08-17T17:04:51.113" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="I don't know if there is a way to force people to specific global locations. Maybe tags, but most new users wouldn't use/know about them.. Maybe a quick drop down when a question is asked to at least specify broad region?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the time being, we can just comment to specify/clarify the question location preferences. Most of the questions I have seen have been online orders, but helpful to at least know the continent. We do have the location portion of the user profile, but that is not required or always accurate." />
  <row Id="813" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="453" RevisionGUID="38efda82-ec52-4455-9034-87d283e9f319" CreationDate="2009-08-17T16:46:01.540" UserDisplayName="Jonik" Text="I was wondering (prompted mostly by this: [Where can you buy a generic (no OS) desktop PC?][1]) about questions that are, to some extent, bound to a specific geographical area. These include, most notably, &quot;where to buy&quot; type questions on Super User.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should localised questions be allowed in the first place, or should all questions be formulated somehow &quot;universally&quot;? (I have no strong opinion on this, but am posing the question as I know there is the seldom-used *too localized* close reason in existence, and I've seen &quot;.NET user groups in Austin, TX?&quot; type of questions being closed on SO.) Region-specific &quot;where to buy&quot; questions would probably work much better than trying to fit all in one... but where to draw the line as to *how* localised questions can be? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if such questions are allowed, would it be ok to tag them with geographical tags? Or would some other practices be useful for making it more manageable? (I for one would like to ignore content that could only ever be useful for those hailing from US or Canada, and I'm sure most of you would rather not waste time with questions about best computer stores in Finland.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, to state the obvious, when the asker specifies no location in this type of question, and assumes that *by default* it's understood as &quot;in the US&quot;, that's slightly annoying from a non-US perspective. (In similar vein, I hope we won't default to a policy that &quot;US-only is ok; specific to any other country/region is too localised&quot; — even if [clear plurality of users are Americans][2].)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any thoughts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/23713/where-can-you-buy-a-generic-no-os-desktop-pc&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/01/where-in-the-world-do-stack-overflow-users-come-from/" />
  <row Id="814" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="453" RevisionGUID="38efda82-ec52-4455-9034-87d283e9f319" CreationDate="2009-08-17T16:46:01.540" UserDisplayName="Jonik" Text="Geographically limited or country-specific questions" />
  <row Id="815" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="453" RevisionGUID="38efda82-ec52-4455-9034-87d283e9f319" CreationDate="2009-08-17T16:46:01.540" UserDisplayName="Jonik" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;too-localized&gt;" />
  <row Id="816" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="453" RevisionGUID="5c99f243-3239-4a65-b1b8-b78579694c54" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:11.637" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/14957/geographically-limited-or-country-specific-questions" Text="" />
  <row Id="817" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="457" RevisionGUID="0a751ba3-b4eb-465f-8fad-9654afa6a89f" CreationDate="2009-08-17T19:57:37.643" UserDisplayName="Geoffrey Chetwood" Text="There is no way to define that boundary here. Every case has to be taken as it comes and judged appropriately." />
  <row Id="818" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="458" RevisionGUID="a02867f8-abc3-4d5e-9afd-fe1fb3826ff7" CreationDate="2009-08-17T20:01:25.577" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="I know I addressed this somewhere on Meta before but I don't know where.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically what I said then was that if someone is talking about doing something which violates warranty (say, jailbreaking an iPhone) that is generally acceptable and I will tend to leave a note on the question telling the community that SuperUser does not advocate nor take responsibility for any behavior which could void a warranty or break your product.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For items which are blatantly inquiring on how to do illegal activities, it is much easier to draw a line. The only real problem is what if it is legal in one area and illegal in another? You could get into a debate over that in itself. It is illegal to try and bypass the national firewall in China, but nobody would think twice about an American asking a firewall/proxy question to get by a corporate filter. Questions asking how to acquire illegal copies of software are 99.999% likely to be closed immediately." />
  <row Id="819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="456" RevisionGUID="88b814a6-36aa-4361-a773-cf8b6dedbf4f" CreationDate="2009-08-17T19:52:32.507" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="We just had a question on Superuser regarding [WGA and the risks of ignoring those messages][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now I agree with TheTXI comment:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The OP says that he could locate the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; windows key and try to validate it.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; That is enough to make the assumption&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that it is valid. And even if his&#xD;&#xA;&gt; installation was not legit, the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; questions is not asking how to get by&#xD;&#xA;&gt; WGA or advocating for piracy. All it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is asking for is consequences of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ignoring the WGA message, which is an&#xD;&#xA;&gt; entirely legitimate question even for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; regular legal users who get hit with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the WGA warnings for no reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But where do we draw a border for questions we want to see answered on Superuser? Since if certain people start to see topics like this pop-up they might start to ask questions that go over the border and into warez-like areas. Especially now that Superuser is going public, the risk of question on illegitimate topics are bound to become frequent and I would personally like to prevent that from happening. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any thoughts? Perhaps I'm just overreacting...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/23833/consequences-of-windows-genuine-advantage" />
  <row Id="820" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="456" RevisionGUID="88b814a6-36aa-4361-a773-cf8b6dedbf4f" CreationDate="2009-08-17T19:52:32.507" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="Where's the border between good and evil on Superuser?" />
  <row Id="821" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="456" RevisionGUID="88b814a6-36aa-4361-a773-cf8b6dedbf4f" CreationDate="2009-08-17T19:52:32.507" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;legality&gt;" />
  <row Id="822" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="456" RevisionGUID="3e0cfd78-595b-4b22-9560-bd66999d78cc" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:11.887" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/14992/wheres-the-border-between-good-and-evil-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="460" RevisionGUID="41d1e88b-afd5-49d3-8144-c4b445a952e4" CreationDate="2009-08-18T09:37:17.697" UserDisplayName="Michael Borgwardt" Text="Why should it be?" />
  <row Id="824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="461" RevisionGUID="ec35dfb2-4cf0-4d13-81f3-e6308f7a9fe6" CreationDate="2009-08-18T09:44:53.103" UserDisplayName="Rowland Shaw" Text="Jeff Atwood is on Twitter under the [codinghorror][1] pseudonym - he quite often tweets about SuperUser (and StackOverflow, ServerFault, etc.) too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://twitter.com/codinghorror" />
  <row Id="825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="462" RevisionGUID="20204c44-59fc-49fc-83a3-e9ff5420e4d3" CreationDate="2009-08-18T09:46:50.570" UserDisplayName="nik" Text="You can plug to RSS feeds -- (look at the link on the bottom-right of this page).  &#xD;&#xA;And, if you must, [plug Twitter through **FeedMyTwitter**][1] from there (now better named as [**twit robot**][2]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.feedmytwitter.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://twitrobot.com/index.html" />
  <row Id="826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="463" RevisionGUID="1f87980d-0a80-42bf-9ebc-4a4eae4ecc27" CreationDate="2009-08-18T11:07:02.407" UserDisplayName="jack.spicer" Text="I don't know why some of you are in denial of the usefulness of Twitter.  &#xD;&#xA;There is no harm putting such a wonderful site on Twitter.  &#xD;&#xA;After all social networking is good for any site and its followers.  &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="827" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="464" RevisionGUID="5603408c-6fa7-4080-ad51-c28ccf5965d6" CreationDate="2009-08-18T14:01:13.693" UserDisplayName="Al" Text="Most people follow sites on Twitter so they can see the latest improvements and changes. If you'd like to follow the latest happenings with SuperUser and the other sites in the family, just follow the RSS feed for the [Meta &lt;kbd&gt;status-completed&lt;/kbd&gt; tag][1]. Or for less detail just follow the [Stack Overflow blog][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/status-completed&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com" />
  <row Id="828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="459" RevisionGUID="2257d63f-9029-4cde-ae64-fbcaacf369e6" CreationDate="2009-08-18T09:36:02.660" UserDisplayName="jack.spicer" Text="I have one habit. Every time I stumble upon a good site, I bookmark it and search it on the Twitter. As I joined SuperUser. I searched for &quot;superuser&quot; on Twitter to follow it. But the search yielded nothing, so I want to ask **why isn't SuperUser on Twitter?** If it's there, then what is its user name?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am really looking forward to follow it on Twitter.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="829" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="459" RevisionGUID="2257d63f-9029-4cde-ae64-fbcaacf369e6" CreationDate="2009-08-18T09:36:02.660" UserDisplayName="jack.spicer" Text="Why isn't SuperUser on twitter?" />
  <row Id="830" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="459" RevisionGUID="2257d63f-9029-4cde-ae64-fbcaacf369e6" CreationDate="2009-08-18T09:36:02.660" UserDisplayName="jack.spicer" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;" />
  <row Id="831" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="459" RevisionGUID="d03f529a-5abb-40c8-a1a2-167f10d86f03" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:12.320" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15110/why-isnt-superuser-on-twitter" Text="" />
  <row Id="832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="466" RevisionGUID="0e8cc500-da7a-444a-addb-607ea5e0d88d" CreationDate="2009-08-18T14:14:09.460" UserDisplayName="Jon Skeet" Text="It seems pretty reasonable to me. The border will become increasingly tricky to distinguish with more and more RIAs...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why should it matter exactly where the software lives? I'm sure no-one would close a question where someone happened to be using a desktop app via VNC... if you think of a web app in the same way (just providing an extra level of indirection effectively) why would a web app be a second class citizen?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Fundamentally, are these &quot;worse&quot; questions in some way? Are they questions which won't help other people? Are they not about using software effectively? It seems to me that they could easily meet all the criteria for a good question; prohibiting them out of hand would be very odd IMO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(That's not to say all questions about web apps will be good, of course...)" />
  <row Id="833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="467" RevisionGUID="1665b240-ac59-4408-b9a1-2dcc4e607e45" CreationDate="2009-08-18T14:15:33.437" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="If a developer has a question about FBQL (for example), I see SO as a great place to ask. Joel has expressed his desire for SO to be the hub of knowledge when it comes to programming, even if that means accommodating the questions for other people's services (especially something as large as FB)." />
  <row Id="834" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="468" RevisionGUID="4151a506-6fc9-4b0c-b7d1-de10ddb4e924" CreationDate="2009-08-19T17:06:54.120" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="I don't really have a problem with website related questions, it's just that certain people are either asking for something impossible or are just asking for confirmation: they think something's cool and they want other people to see it. Sadly for them I fear a lot of other users don't like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will have to depend on the quality and googleness of the question if it should stay open or be closed" />
  <row Id="835" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="469" RevisionGUID="8a3a9c51-e345-42dc-a606-a7efeff06a62" CreationDate="2009-08-20T01:19:27.140" Text="I do not care for them myself -- although as Ivo points out it depends on the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, **I'd say it has to do with whether it's a simple &quot;support&quot; question or a real &quot;power user&quot; question about clever / interesting things to do with the site**." />
  <row Id="836" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="470" RevisionGUID="73fa615f-b289-4ee6-a92d-d4ba60902ea5" CreationDate="2010-01-17T11:46:09.170" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="Poking this question back *(the original poster won't update anytime soon, and asking about it again would seem to be a duplicate) (consider eventually updating it with the following)*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [FAQ][1] for SU has been updated today, and now includes &quot;websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&quot; in the list of question to not ask.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does it mean we are now on an exclusive closing behavior of all this kind of questions? Typically, we have a fair amount of question about specific things on GMail, should such kind of question be closed from now on, or do we apply a more &quot;gentle&quot; moderation on them on the model of Jeff's answer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** I mean only for new questions, not about applying the policy to previous questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/faq" />
  <row Id="837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="465" RevisionGUID="6e04459d-50a5-4d9a-98eb-7e69e587a7bd" CreationDate="2009-08-18T14:11:48.450" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="It seems appropriate that questions concerning the usage of different software go to SuperUser, but there seems to be a bit of confusion as to whether or not questions asking about specific websites (generic example: &quot;Why can't I do [something] on Facebook?&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should we be condoning these types of questions? With the way the web has changed things over the past few years, web applications can be treated almost the same as desktop software (another example: Google Docs vs. Microsoft Office)." />
  <row Id="838" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="465" RevisionGUID="6e04459d-50a5-4d9a-98eb-7e69e587a7bd" CreationDate="2009-08-18T14:11:48.450" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Should questions concerning specific websites be allowed on SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="839" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="465" RevisionGUID="6e04459d-50a5-4d9a-98eb-7e69e587a7bd" CreationDate="2009-08-18T14:11:48.450" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="840" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="465" RevisionGUID="79aed5b1-7aad-4f4b-bd1f-2805f27bdb28" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:13.430" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15161/should-questions-concerning-specific-websites-be-allowed-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="472" RevisionGUID="d0be4c89-3620-4a5f-a97a-838131d070fc" CreationDate="2009-08-18T15:56:07.650" UserDisplayName="Timothy Carter" Text="An example can be seen by going to this search results [page][1]. I observe the same behavior as the OP using Chrome 2.0.172.39 on Windows XP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additional note, this seems to only affect a link to a tag that I have followed. Also, when following the link in IE 8.0.6001.18702, I do then see the documented issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/search?q=windows+downloading+updates" />
  <row Id="842" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="473" RevisionGUID="80e3715b-3df1-4639-bc30-f320ab7d10d7" CreationDate="2009-08-24T01:18:54.683" UserDisplayName="Andrew Keeton" Text="Here's a screenshot when searching with the [iphone] tag, which I'm following. (Firefox 3.5.2)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/3761/questionscontainingipho.png" />
  <row Id="843" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="474" RevisionGUID="6ceca7f7-5e27-477d-acd1-faa2275c9dde" CreationDate="2009-09-17T04:38:37.567" UserDisplayName="a_m0d" Text="Same issue for me on FireFox 3.0.14 on Linux [see my dupe question](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/22325/tag-display-bug-on-superuser)." />
  <row Id="844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="471" RevisionGUID="d0e5b35d-e9c2-499d-bcf5-b56871bec2fc" CreationDate="2009-08-18T14:51:29.383" UserDisplayName="MacAnthony" Text="When doing a term search on superuser.com and it switches the term to a tag. If the tag is a tag you are following, you can't read the tag text unless you hover over the tag. The tag get places under the heading &quot;within these tags&quot; at the top right of the page. The text color and the background are the same color making it impossible to read the tag text unless you hover over the tag block.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Browser is Google Chrome on XP (not sure if it matters as I haven't tested it out with other browsers)" />
  <row Id="845" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="471" RevisionGUID="d0e5b35d-e9c2-499d-bcf5-b56871bec2fc" CreationDate="2009-08-18T14:51:29.383" UserDisplayName="MacAnthony" Text="Tag name not viewable when doing search on superuser" />
  <row Id="846" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="471" RevisionGUID="d0e5b35d-e9c2-499d-bcf5-b56871bec2fc" CreationDate="2009-08-18T14:51:29.383" UserDisplayName="MacAnthony" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="847" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="471" RevisionGUID="6ac041c2-1bb0-40ef-9e0a-c1b9d7b4696c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:14.360" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15174/tag-name-not-viewable-when-doing-search-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="848" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="476" RevisionGUID="bfd2057f-f121-4d70-a3ef-de302fb1273d" CreationDate="2009-08-19T00:26:13.950" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="I'm surprised that driver is the most common. I would assume that &quot;drivers&quot; would be the first thing thought of when trying to do a search. Maybe that is just me." />
  <row Id="849" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="477" RevisionGUID="de7270e9-789e-4d65-8718-3ef55f33c97f" CreationDate="2009-08-19T00:26:38.677" UserDisplayName="random" Text="&lt;kbd&gt;driver&lt;/kbd&gt; sounds less intuitive than &lt;kbd&gt;drivers&lt;/kbd&gt;. Stilted even, like it was some kind of attempt at keeping things in singular fashion as opposed to plural.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you're talking about [drivers], you're talking about [drivers]. Can't see it being [driver].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;kbd&gt;device-driver&lt;/kbd&gt; seems way superfluous. " />
  <row Id="850" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="475" RevisionGUID="bbed496e-69dc-4be7-a59b-2d8b816eeaa3" CreationDate="2009-08-19T00:19:36.153" UserDisplayName="Zifre" Text="This is a simple retag request:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Merge &lt;kbd&gt;driver&lt;/kbd&gt;, &lt;kbd&gt;drivers&lt;/kbd&gt;, and &lt;kbd&gt;device-driver&lt;/kbd&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;kbd&gt;driver&lt;/kbd&gt; is the most common, so they should probably be merged into that. **EDIT:** Actually, as a few people have pointed out, &lt;kbd&gt;drivers&lt;/kbd&gt; is probably more intuitive, so that may make more sense." />
  <row Id="851" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="475" RevisionGUID="bbed496e-69dc-4be7-a59b-2d8b816eeaa3" CreationDate="2009-08-19T00:19:36.153" UserDisplayName="Zifre" Text="Merge tags driver, drivers, and device-driver on SU" />
  <row Id="852" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="475" RevisionGUID="bbed496e-69dc-4be7-a59b-2d8b816eeaa3" CreationDate="2009-08-19T00:19:36.153" UserDisplayName="Zifre" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="853" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="475" RevisionGUID="c0b32087-a6b1-45aa-b386-1e79a57bc81e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:14.637" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15285/merge-tags-driver-drivers-and-device-driver-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="854" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="479" RevisionGUID="22ec52ca-a8e3-4b04-986d-ef64cca0835f" CreationDate="2009-08-19T10:03:27.620" UserDisplayName="random" Text="It might just be waiting to be kicked into gear. So, patience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, the Beta badge might have just asked the [Enthusiast badge to change shifts][1] while it had to take an emergency personal day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/14124/enthusiast-badge-too-enthusiastic" />
  <row Id="855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="480" RevisionGUID="196e0dc5-d32c-4754-b5c0-2ea5a3320a87" CreationDate="2009-08-19T11:30:03.000" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Beta badge is being awarded now. I got mine when I logged in." />
  <row Id="856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="481" RevisionGUID="357745b2-a0f8-420a-b98e-b7a09fc79ab6" CreationDate="2009-08-19T12:06:44.483" UserDisplayName="Workshop Alex" Text="Ah, that explains why I suddenly got a Beta badge on SuperUser. :-)" />
  <row Id="857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="478" RevisionGUID="2af47b18-7b1f-4233-a15c-ce020b1794e2" CreationDate="2009-08-19T09:58:03.497" UserDisplayName="Randell" Text="Why aren't there any SuperUser users with a Beta badge?" />
  <row Id="858" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="478" RevisionGUID="2af47b18-7b1f-4233-a15c-ce020b1794e2" CreationDate="2009-08-19T09:58:03.497" UserDisplayName="Randell" Text="Why aren't there any SuperUser users with a Beta badge?" />
  <row Id="859" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="478" RevisionGUID="2af47b18-7b1f-4233-a15c-ce020b1794e2" CreationDate="2009-08-19T09:58:03.497" UserDisplayName="Randell" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;badges&gt;&lt;beta&gt;" />
  <row Id="860" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="478" RevisionGUID="83fb17a6-b6b4-4055-b1d5-06d505e7c38b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:14.937" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15397/why-arent-there-any-superuser-users-with-a-beta-badge" Text="" />
  <row Id="861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="483" RevisionGUID="85ad2813-3324-4ba8-bf2d-df1fe0a0734d" CreationDate="2009-08-19T15:06:59.433" UserDisplayName="Timothy Carter" Text="I think as more people reach 3k and are able to vote to close, the situation will improve some. I believe seeing questions closed and closed quickly, will help set an example of what types of questions are appropriate and what questions aren't. However, I understand the problem, and I'm not certain how much even more high-rep users will help." />
  <row Id="862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="484" RevisionGUID="e98a9747-2c0d-4dbd-b97f-97867f7f71a8" CreationDate="2009-08-19T15:07:31.117" UserDisplayName="Thomas Owens" Text="SU is not a sewer! Real questions, real answers only." />
  <row Id="863" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="485" RevisionGUID="023305e4-3d25-476c-824e-053efa82a494" CreationDate="2009-08-19T15:12:12.557" UserDisplayName="tvanfosson" Text="As a former, actual superuser -- root doth have it's privileges --  I'm a little offended at the name of the site.  In my mind superuser would have been a better name for serverfault.  Then they could have named the current superuser site, luser.com.  People could ask their gmail questions to their hearts' content and nobody would care.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;:-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The true advantage is that it makes it marginally less controversial to remove non-germane questions from SO and SF.  I expect that to be the only real benefit to me unless, of course, I'm suddenly overcome with the desire to know the [Hidden Features of Windows Vista][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/12450/hidden-features-of-windows-vista" />
  <row Id="864" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="486" RevisionGUID="28218021-1796-4ed0-b810-4bc707eeb300" CreationDate="2009-08-19T15:14:12.867" UserDisplayName="random" Text="The moderating team, as well as level-headed high repped users, need to have short tempers for this to be nipped in the bud. Patience? Why? The fail-to-learn askers don't care, they'll cry foul no matter what happens to them. And then the pity votes come along and it goes downhill into the bin.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's concerning that a band of those high rep users coasted off patently bad, unhelpful and not for SU questions. And they're certainly not ones to want to police it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spotting [Super User on the delicious popular yesterday][1], the run of people eager to replicate the early &quot;must have&quot; and &quot;best app&quot; questions still lingering on the site was rampant in the hours after the beta was done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://delicious.com/url/9dd3c6687a0af516c1f57b3aa580f088" />
  <row Id="865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="487" RevisionGUID="cdb83998-6a46-4e02-b35a-016909775bd0" CreationDate="2009-08-19T15:20:27.440" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Both questions have been closed. Please flag these questions or if you have the ability vote to close and we will handle them as they come in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once one of the other mods agree I will delete these questions. Please bear with me on this one as the newest moderator I take my lead from them on occassion. This being one of them." />
  <row Id="866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="488" RevisionGUID="eb9b9851-0d6a-4f45-be69-2d9bf0ac1b5a" CreationDate="2009-08-19T15:28:51.510" UserDisplayName="EvilChookie" Text="People who see an error seem to just rush to SU. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Someone just asked why their terminal was telling them they had mail. Well, that would be because you ... have ... mail. It's uncanny, I know.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know exactly where Jonathan is coming from, having participated in some of the subjective threads. There are a ton of questions that clearly show the user isn't trying to solve the problem, they just want someone to answer them. I've also seen several users who just post really oddball questions that most people don't even care about just to satisfy their odd curiosity. (How many windows can you maximize in OSX comes to mind)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to see something of a disclaimer for asking questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Have you read the manual?&#xD;&#xA;2. Have you even looked at google?&#xD;&#xA;3. Have you contacted the people who make &lt;your product&gt; to see if they have any ideas?&#xD;&#xA;4. Have you read the manual?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And probably some guidelines for including stuff:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. If the problem relates to software, we need to know the version of all software concerned. OSX isn't good enough, are you 10.4, 10.5, etc?&#xD;&#xA;2. If it's hardware, tell us about the hardware. Brands, manufacturers, odd whirring noises, etc.&#xD;&#xA;3. What have you tried? What are you thinking?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While this might seem over the top, I reckon it would help to at the very least produce better questions. I used a similar approach for my clients when I was doing tech support, and worked surprisingly well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;It doesn't work&quot; or &quot;what does this mean&quot; just doesn't cut it - we need details!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And yes, I realize I repeated 4. But it stands true - RTFM.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit** It seems that some people believe I'm against asking simple questions on any of the  SOFU sites. However, I'm not. Please read this part again:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ... it would help at the very least to produce **better questions** ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The goal is to produce better questions, to produce better knowledge so everyone can benefit. How do you produce a better question if **people aren't given any guidelines on how to ask a good question?**" />
  <row Id="867" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="489" RevisionGUID="adbb5552-5c7e-44e4-902b-9dd281275fea" CreationDate="2009-08-19T15:59:00.247" UserDisplayName="Juan Manuel" Text="I agree, I don't like what super user has become (even in the closed beta), and my 250 reputation is an illustration of how much I like going there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think quality will need to be improved somehow, perhaps more admins, better guidelines as to what is permitted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or maybe the target audience is not the same as StackOVerflow or ServerFault... and that's how it's going to be" />
  <row Id="868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="490" RevisionGUID="8d637e51-af6c-4b28-a3f9-889fb877079d" CreationDate="2009-08-19T16:02:33.970" UserDisplayName="hyperslug" Text="The polls are a minority.  They do bubble up every once in a while, but if you look at the front page now, it's mostly general PC troubelshooting which I believe was the site's intent.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And a few of the polls do have some merit.  They often expose tools I'd never heard of and would be very interested in trying." />
  <row Id="869" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="491" RevisionGUID="97e396c2-c129-4999-a415-f94e74ff6142" CreationDate="2009-08-19T16:05:54.477" UserDisplayName="Ladybug Killer" Text="If Jeff throws hardware on perfromance problems, maybe he should throw moderators to SuperUser for the same reason. They are inexpensive! Yes, we had new moderators (yesterday?). But with these problems we should raise more.  &#xD;&#xA;The exisitng ones doing their job, I don't question this! But what are 10 termites against 10,000 ants?" />
  <row Id="870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="492" RevisionGUID="ad0edacb-bf50-4336-bbf8-46733e378915" CreationDate="2009-08-19T16:13:16.880" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="Heheheh...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember back when SO first came out of Beta? A wave of new folks showed up, saw that the most popular questions were vague, subjective, or non-programming-related. And immediately tried to emulate them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And there was grumbling, close-wars, and a never-ending stream of whining on UserVoice. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That SO remains useful *at all* today can be credited to a core set of users who really *did* want a site specifically for programming questions, and are still sticking it out, trying to make that a reality in the face of hoards of users who would just as soon turn it into something else.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel that unless SU manages to attract something similar, it's doomed to be flooded with noise, regardless of how many moderators are created for it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally, i'm fine with that. IMHO, the best thing about SU is that it provides a place for all the off-topic but arguably computer-related questions that would otherwise plague SO and SF. If those sites have less noise at the expense of SU, then it will have done *something* good at least..." />
  <row Id="871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="493" RevisionGUID="977fa173-aec0-4e80-9536-c95ac3950e76" CreationDate="2009-08-19T16:25:01.740" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="I have a similar problem as Diago: I can vote to close, but it's hard to judge what other people think should not be allowed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm actually quite impressed with the speed at which a lot of questions are closed already, but it would be easier if we had some better guidelines or a consensus about what should and what shouldn't stay&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though somewhere you should be happy if Supuser acts as a garbage bin, since then at least the other sites will remain clean...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However up till now I've been cautious about voting to close or flagging, because I didn't want to hurt newbie's morale too much. I understand some people will never fit the system, but others at least need a warning to try and improve by themselves. If not we can still take it down" />
  <row Id="872" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="494" RevisionGUID="6451f1c0-a478-46a9-9cad-525ede0a004b" CreationDate="2009-08-19T18:22:05.343" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="Can't vote to close yet, but I'm on my way... (at least I like the site, and want to be quite active on it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; SuperUser is not a garbage bin, it's simply opened to people who are less at ease with computers. It's easy to expect a strong description of a problem from a programmer or a sysadmin (even if, we agree, not every time). But SuperUser is dedicated not only to really specific, &quot;power user&quot; questions, but also to people who are not that good in even describing their problems, since they don't really master the field of activity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SuperUser **IS** different from the other sites, as it's the one which requires the most pedagogical approach. Half the questions will be badly written, or not respecting the standards we expect, not mentioning essential details. But that's **normal**. It's the role of the community to guide them, and to help them improve their questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, at the beginning there will be a bit silly things, like the cascade of &quot;Must Have&quot;. But I'm convinced this will pass with more users being able to vote for close, and in general, with more regular users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit** : For now, only 10 people are even able to call for closing, plus moderators. And I don't believe they spend all their time checking every question, so it's normal that the current moderation level is low." />
  <row Id="873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="495" RevisionGUID="e5e582a4-920c-4a59-848c-ba6de322bc40" CreationDate="2009-08-19T18:25:58.080" UserDisplayName="arathorn" Text="I must say, I'm pretty frustrated at the desire for more strictness. Please tell me what the harm is in allowing a bit looser of an environment in SuperUser? Case in point:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I posted [the Gmail features question][1] early on in the beta and have spent a fair bit of time monitoring it and keeping the answers clear and well-defined. And, if you actually look through the answers and comments before just slamming it closed, you'll be able to see numerous instances of folks learning about new features they didn't know existed. This list would also be very useful to someone investigating the service to find out what it lacks. Why shut down something that is, **in actual fact**, useful to the community?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think you &quot;oldtimers&quot; from SF and SO need to just accept the fact that SU is going to be a bit messier. Is anyone coming to SU to get help *not* being helped because of this messiness? NO. I've seen numerous well-meaning users getting shunned, though, when posting an &quot;unholy&quot; question, though. Real helpful, that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the only site of the three that I've spent much time on, and now I feel that a lot of my time was wasted, and I really don't have much desire to continue to contribute.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/8127/what-features-are-missing-from-gmail-closed" />
  <row Id="874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="496" RevisionGUID="53af6185-076d-4fd2-bfbb-f401dc2e91c1" CreationDate="2009-08-19T21:40:47.733" UserDisplayName="JohnFx" Text="It's just people trying to get their rep up just like everyone did when SO was new.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Similarly it will fade once these people start gaining some rep and moderate the hell out of the newbies who try to do the same thing behind them." />
  <row Id="875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="497" RevisionGUID="6e415c6a-0a8b-4c26-90b8-87f25afddf41" CreationDate="2009-08-21T18:38:51.170" UserDisplayName="Damien" Text="Incidentally if, like me, you started a subjective question and marked it as community wiki then you are not attempting to rep-scam the site and the complaints about those who game the system gaining rep are generally groundless. Indeed, a quick look over the top Superuser user's show that this is not as big a problem as people claim. I will delete my question but I resent the implication that by asking it I was scamming for rep. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Superuser was meant to be less strict as far as I am aware and questions like &quot;Worst Software Ever&quot; or &quot;Best Windows Applications&quot; or the comedy ones (my personal favourites) were within scope. Maybe this needs to be made clealer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my view this whole issue keeps coming up and it's clear we have a inclusionist vs deletionist set of camps on SO/SU/SF. I put myself in the former because I believe that to work as a community you need the fun questions, not to dominate the site of course, but to act as a release valve to the questions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I sympathise and agree with a lot of what the OP said but let's not start another community wide lock-down of anything which remotely stays even a little bit outside the direct &quot;Heres a question, Heres a definitive answer&quot; system. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/twocents" />
  <row Id="876" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="498" RevisionGUID="20501bb8-0dca-4b26-adb1-58d7cbbb87fb" CreationDate="2009-08-27T05:16:00.893" UserDisplayName="The User FormerlyKnownAs Larry" Text="I think adding comments to the question when you close it helps a lot. Instead of just seeing the standard &quot;closed as not computer related&quot; ect. Several of the posts closed today were commented by the closer. I think that will help teach people what is intended.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW Thanks @TheTXI for reopening this question [Will a PCI (not PCI-e) card work for The Sims 3][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/27989/will-a-pci-not-pci-e-card-work-for-the-sims-3" />
  <row Id="877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="499" RevisionGUID="b93afb39-c183-4f03-afbd-c9f9568dbc4e" CreationDate="2010-03-09T15:23:28.823" UserDisplayName="Yar" Text="From a reader/browser perspective, SU is certainly a trash dump. In contrast, SO is a relatively orderly garden. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you actually have a question to ask on SU that is appropriate for SU, it will get answered quickly and well. I admit, it's not the pride and joy of the Internet, but it does work. " />
  <row Id="878" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="482" RevisionGUID="59c05838-d6cd-436a-ba84-dba3416fea59" CreationDate="2009-08-19T14:59:01.943" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="I am almost tired of visiting SuperUser. I'm tired of seeing non-superuser questions asked over and over, getting up-voted, and more. It was asked &quot;What features are missing from gmail,&quot; how on Earth does this question help solve any problem? Then it was asked &quot;What features are missing from Yahoo Mail.&quot; Again, why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other questions include things along the line of &quot;What's a pretty screensaver,&quot; and &quot;What's the shinest applications you've seen?&quot; This is complete garbage - and I hate to say that it appears that SuperUser is going down in flames from my perspective. It's becoming a forum for giddy kids to talk about irrelevant stupid nonsense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can we please be a bit more strict there with regards to what is a proper question, and actually mandate &quot;superuser&quot; questions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sorry for coming across as a bit pissed, but I'm really sad to say that I am finding less and less reason to visit this site with each passing day, and I don't want to feel this way." />
  <row Id="879" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="482" RevisionGUID="59c05838-d6cd-436a-ba84-dba3416fea59" CreationDate="2009-08-19T14:59:01.943" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="Can we please have more strictness on SU?" />
  <row Id="880" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="482" RevisionGUID="59c05838-d6cd-436a-ba84-dba3416fea59" CreationDate="2009-08-19T14:59:01.943" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="881" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="482" RevisionGUID="d687fab9-a403-4c58-b404-e003da898de2" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:15.500" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15456/can-we-please-have-more-strictness-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="501" RevisionGUID="ca599565-6212-4290-96e5-6ac4fad94b96" CreationDate="2009-08-20T08:21:35.753" UserDisplayName="balpha" Text="I sometimes leave a comment asking the poster for a little more, like at least summarizing what the linked-to site has to offer in respect to the specific question. Often, the link alone is posted just to be the FGITW, but later added to anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, a comment sometimes convinces the poster to add a little bit. If there's still nothing after a while, I downvote." />
  <row Id="883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="502" RevisionGUID="e98a717e-6454-41d3-93f1-b4e8e221cca1" CreationDate="2009-08-20T08:29:01.400" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="Generally if I was trying to answer the question and find out that the link was the &quot;best&quot; or correct answer, I sometimes take the liberty to quote the text from the link in their answer making it more complete myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would hope that this has a lead by example effect, such that they will try to do the same next time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see no point in posting my own answer with a better format, since I would be taking credit for their answer. Downvoting only demotivates someone, while his answer was correct it was merely incomplete, for me that ain't worth a downvote really.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So either leave a comment asking them to elaborate on their answer/link or edit it (if you can)" />
  <row Id="884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="503" RevisionGUID="86f8a40f-e782-413c-bd86-1629c5731172" CreationDate="2009-08-20T08:30:48.450" UserDisplayName="random" Text="If you down vote, which would be a reasonable action, they'll just whine all the way in their wah-wah-wah-bulance about how the link has the information or that it's a valid solution. Even if this is flying in the face of the link rot problem. More so if it's a quarter-arsed attempt at helping make SOFU **the** information repository. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And then some fool will upvote them out of sympathy which doesn't teach them anything and only reinforces the bad practice." />
  <row Id="885" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="504" RevisionGUID="b69fadd2-32fb-49c4-8305-b65152b78c58" CreationDate="2009-08-20T08:37:01.667" UserDisplayName="Randell" Text="I downvote link only answers when its a shameless plug. Or even non-link shameless plugs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You know how to lessen those answers? **Provide better ones** so the link-only answers go at the bottom of the list." />
  <row Id="886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="505" RevisionGUID="71700676-f452-496e-bb94-5d15bd6b0fe9" CreationDate="2009-08-20T08:46:26.763" UserDisplayName="innaM" Text="To me, this depends on the link target. The default answer to your question would be: yes, they should be downvoted. They should be downvoted even more when the link points to some obscure forum where the actual answer is hard to find. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, I think that a question like &quot;What is X&quot; can be answered by simply providing a link to the relevant wikipedia article. But it should be answered with that link and a short summary." />
  <row Id="887" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="506" RevisionGUID="30138296-289f-4f7d-a425-f5691cca5a09" CreationDate="2009-08-20T12:36:25.517" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="It was asked today &quot;Does LinkedIn have an API?&quot; to which I replied with a link to their API. I *think* that's acceptable." />
  <row Id="888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="508" RevisionGUID="a45c76a4-6ce3-41af-b888-eb1075946391" CreationDate="2009-12-09T21:50:23.077" UserDisplayName="iandisme" Text="I think you should downvote link-only answers, unless the link answers the question perfectly. Then, downvote the question." />
  <row Id="889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="507" RevisionGUID="7c50144f-c676-4384-a507-1b0cb5d47c50" CreationDate="2009-08-20T14:46:59.693" UserDisplayName="GoogleUser" Text="The creators of the site have taken precautions to limit the &quot;fastest gun in the west&quot;. I would think some type of statement indicating why the link provides a good answer should be included." />
  <row Id="890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="500" RevisionGUID="d43908a3-bea0-47b1-91d2-f513d7c9fc53" CreationDate="2009-08-20T08:17:09.427" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="&gt; **Related:**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Ban lmgtfy (le me google that for you) links](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15650/ban-lmgtfy-let-me-google-that-for-you-links)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on the [Why is linking bad?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7515/why-is-linking-bad) question as well as [Are answers that contain only links really good answers?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8231/are-answers-that-just-contain-links-elsewhere-really-good-answers) question, is it acceptable behavior to downvote these questions with a comment requesting the OP to provide more information rather then just a link?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Link only answers is becoming almost acceptable practice on SU at the moment and I would like some input on ways to stop this practice from becoming a norm?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This](http://superuser.com/questions/26077/realvnc-just-appeared-after-restart/26106#26106) question along with [this](http://superuser.com/questions/26090/laptop-as-a-tv-remote/26112#26112) would be examples of where I have done this. I am willing to reverse this if it is not acceptable." />
  <row Id="891" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="500" RevisionGUID="d43908a3-bea0-47b1-91d2-f513d7c9fc53" CreationDate="2009-08-20T08:17:09.427" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Is downvoting link only answers acceptable?" />
  <row Id="892" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="500" RevisionGUID="d43908a3-bea0-47b1-91d2-f513d7c9fc53" CreationDate="2009-08-20T08:17:09.427" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;answers&gt;&lt;down-votes&gt;" />
  <row Id="893" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="500" RevisionGUID="17d7d115-bbf7-4d0a-a565-279fefaaad3c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:21.543" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15625/is-downvoting-link-only-answers-acceptable" Text="" />
  <row Id="894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="510" RevisionGUID="c15db17e-02e3-4534-b193-7889729f0f8f" CreationDate="2009-08-21T14:51:16.327" UserDisplayName="devinb" Text="I would say that they are not. They are proprietary external devices. If you are speaking of programming something that could interface with an [iPod][1], that's Stack Overflow related, and if you are speaking of your computer applications relating to iPods, that's Super User related. But hardware or embedded software issues are not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPod" />
  <row Id="895" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="510" RevisionGUID="c15db17e-02e3-4534-b193-7889729f0f8f" CreationDate="2009-08-21T14:51:16.327" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="511" RevisionGUID="ea1f5795-78f2-46c9-9e15-176e31f60d56" CreationDate="2009-08-21T14:58:03.337" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="General questions about mp3 players and their functionality (such as iPod and sometimes iPod Touch) I would not classify as acceptable material.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions about &quot;smartphones&quot; and other smart devices (such as iPhone and sometimes iPod Touch) I would classify as acceptable material. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a pretty broad generalization, but I think it matters a lot on where you draw the line on what classifies as a computer and what does not. So far through the beta we have drawn the line traditionally towards the PC/Mac definition of computer and related hardware, while also including smart phones (what many would now almost call mini computers because of all the functionality like web browsing and applications).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is me, I will let most iPhone questions slide (except for ones asking about games), and I would probably let most iPod Touch questions slide as well since it is basically just the iPhone without the phone, so there isn't much difference there in functionality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A question about an iPod shuffle I would generally not accept on face value unless it was asking something that involved a computer. For example: &quot;My iPod shuffle has stopped being recognized automatically by Windows. What do I do?&quot;" />
  <row Id="897" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="511" RevisionGUID="ea1f5795-78f2-46c9-9e15-176e31f60d56" CreationDate="2009-08-21T14:58:03.337" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="512" RevisionGUID="b916c1c6-710b-40aa-9e80-1df3aa1dedb5" CreationDate="2009-08-21T16:30:45.703" UserDisplayName="David Thornley" Text="My definitions:  If I can hypothetically program it without actually being part of a team dedicated to the project, it's a computer.  If I cared to learn Objective-C and pay for a developer license, I could program an iPhone or iTouch, so those are computers.  I can't program anything on an iPod without actually joining Apple or subcontractors and working on the iPod project, so my iPod Nano is not a computer.  I've got an old HP calculator that would qualify as a computer, since it does run programs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I'm mostly on SO, something is programming-related if I can use it directly to support programming.  An editor or IDE or hex calculator or something like that is programming related.  I can only use an iPod for programming by playing music as I work; while this is sometimes a very useful function, it's too indirect to make me call it programming-related.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(For programming-related, I also have a mental model of UnbalancedTotals, a StackExchange program for accountants.  If I can't see any reason why it should got into SO rather than UT, it isn't programming-related.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, a question about an iPhone is computer-related, unless it relates to some restricted canned functionality, like the clock or iPod feature.  A question about an iPod isn't, unless it's about using it as a computer peripheral, such as using it for file storage.  Of the questions in the original question above, the only one I'd consider computer-related is about jailbreaking the iPod Touch. " />
  <row Id="899" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="512" RevisionGUID="b916c1c6-710b-40aa-9e80-1df3aa1dedb5" CreationDate="2009-08-21T16:30:45.703" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="513" RevisionGUID="b7440a28-a517-4c5d-8216-94ec7eb3691d" CreationDate="2009-08-22T09:25:54.647" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I am a bit late to the party, however with all due respect to Micheal I fully agree with both TXI and Jeff on this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the iPhone question is related to a problem with connectivity or iTunes and involves usage on the computer, I allow it. However, if the question is solely regarding the device or an issue on the device, I am bound to close it as not computer related. It is a very gray area, however we are NOT a mobile phone support group, and although I also use my iPhone heavily for SU/MSO I don't necessarily consider it a computer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also it leads to the subject of jail breaking, which I feel is an area SU does not want to get involved in, as is the topic of warez and illegal software activity." />
  <row Id="901" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="513" RevisionGUID="b7440a28-a517-4c5d-8216-94ec7eb3691d" CreationDate="2009-08-22T09:25:54.647" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="902" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="514" RevisionGUID="bd8d9263-32a9-476d-a79d-f7fe7d0da304" CreationDate="2009-08-24T13:18:15.217" UserDisplayName="Sam Schutte" Text="Here's another victim of this policy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/27430/iphone-lag-terrible-slow-anyone-have-a-good-solution&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which I think is pretty ironic, considering one of the founders of the site wrote this article:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001280.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Which I agree with completely)" />
  <row Id="903" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="514" RevisionGUID="bd8d9263-32a9-476d-a79d-f7fe7d0da304" CreationDate="2009-08-24T13:18:15.217" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="904" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="515" RevisionGUID="d9455f9c-8f56-4ba0-9888-5e23c272b0f0" CreationDate="2009-08-31T11:41:17.967" UserDisplayName="benc" Text="I am really baffled by this distinction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I clicked &quot;about:&quot; and it said:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Each website is focused on a specific topic :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Stack Overflow (software development)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Server Fault (system administration and IT professionals)&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User (computer enthusiasts)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;iPods have a lot of functionality beyond music. They have USB-drive mode, support for Syncing contacts, etc. They interact with most of the Apple technology pyramid, and area lso highly compatible with the installed Windows-base.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a lot of actual models, with a large variety in the continuum of functionality. I'm not really sure how you can simply razor out some models, based on complexity. If we applied that to computers, shouldn't we also start (arbitrarily) deciding that certain parts of PC's are &quot;proprietary&quot;, or &quot;external&quot;, or &quot;mp3&quot; players. Should we close posts about USB drives (external), MP3 software (mp3)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, iPod posts should be allowed, and we should make sure they are tagged correctly. (Joel has mentioned something like this in the podcast...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, I don't understand the how-to-geek tie in. I see them in the footer, but there is no description in about, and from looking at the site, it isn't obvious to me why some content would be in SU and some would be in HTG. The site is completely different, and I don't see how they work together in this sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="905" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="515" RevisionGUID="d9455f9c-8f56-4ba0-9888-5e23c272b0f0" CreationDate="2009-08-31T11:41:17.967" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="516" RevisionGUID="bc4e99c2-169b-42c8-a0bb-6215b88933cd" CreationDate="2009-09-03T01:57:40.460" UserDisplayName="Portman" Text="I'm very, very late, but here's my $0.02:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###The only reason computers are mainstream is because of peripherals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the only thing a computer could do is run programs, there would only be about 850 dorky computer enthusiasts in the world. They would talk about software, and if SuperUser was ever created, they would close questions about ipods as &quot;not computer related&quot;. And they would never get a girlfriend.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, thankfully, that's **not** the world we're living in. Odds, are, if you are a &quot;computer enthusiastic&quot;, you are probably enthusiastic about your computer because of some peripheral that you use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Maybe you shoot and edit video with a **digital video camera**&#xD;&#xA; - Maybe you (gasp) rip and mix music on an **mp3 player**&#xD;&#xA; - Maybe you put together awesome slideshows taken on your **digital camera**&#xD;&#xA; - Maybe you really enjoy printing out pics for grandma on your **photo printer**&#xD;&#xA; - Maybe you Skype with a penpal half a world away with your **webcam**&#xD;&#xA; - Maybe you watch movies and TV on your media center connected to a **television**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The point is, super user should be a place where computer enthusiasts can ask questions about their computers __and the peripherals that make them enthusiastic about said computer__.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="907" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="516" RevisionGUID="bc4e99c2-169b-42c8-a0bb-6215b88933cd" CreationDate="2009-09-03T01:57:40.460" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="908" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="519" RevisionGUID="aafae376-e83b-4232-ae32-683dfee8f108" CreationDate="2009-11-03T02:14:41.993" UserDisplayName="fandelost" Text="I've built an &lt;a href=&quot;http://slidetoask.com/&quot; title=&quot;Slide to ask&quot;&gt;iPhone/iPod Touch Q&amp;A&lt;/a&gt; StackExchange site so all these questions are first-class citizens there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope it helps!&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="909" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="519" RevisionGUID="aafae376-e83b-4232-ae32-683dfee8f108" CreationDate="2009-11-03T02:14:41.993" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="910" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="517" RevisionGUID="4a5e457b-2e21-4e4e-98c2-fdee05e6cac6" CreationDate="2009-09-03T13:56:57.947" UserDisplayName="dbkk" Text="IMHO, the distinction is clear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&quot;If the question involves a general-purpose computer (e.g. iPhone), it should be permissible, but if it's about a locked-down consumer device, it is not. &quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Without this distinction, we will eventually start drifting into the &quot;how to use my smart dishwasher&quot; zone. Strictly speaking, your dishwasher has a CPU of some sort, and is probably a Turing-complete computer... " />
  <row Id="911" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="517" RevisionGUID="4a5e457b-2e21-4e4e-98c2-fdee05e6cac6" CreationDate="2009-09-03T13:56:57.947" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="518" RevisionGUID="67e0c0b6-7b6a-4191-9f8b-ac33a56365a1" CreationDate="2009-09-03T15:54:48.227" UserDisplayName="Jeff Donnici" Text="I think it's clear that the &quot;consumer gadget&quot; category and &quot;video game&quot; category warrant sites of their own. I understand Jeff/Joel have concerns with a proliferation of sites (&quot;Knitting Overflow&quot;) - but it's not hard to imagine the business model for SO/SF/SU scaling nicely to other sites and completely different audiences. Each with their own eyeballs and ad opportunities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The video game site seems like a no-brainer... with games, platforms, and hardware devices as tags (not to mention things like &quot;cheat&quot;, &quot;walkthrough&quot;, &quot;easteregg&quot;), lots of opportunity for badge challenges, etc... with fall/winter being the time that a lot of new games arrive (particularly for consoles), the timing seems good as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The gadget site may not be as clear because the category is so broad. Digital cameras. PDA/phone devices. Entertainment/media devices... even &quot;smart dishwasher&quot;.... so it's possible that a gadget site gets unwieldy and you end up with people asking for a &quot;photography&quot; site, a &quot;mobile device&quot; site, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But even with the possibility for gadgets getting very broad very quickly, I think both sites are worth doing." />
  <row Id="913" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="518" RevisionGUID="67e0c0b6-7b6a-4191-9f8b-ac33a56365a1" CreationDate="2009-09-03T15:54:48.227" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="914" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="520" RevisionGUID="d13ba0f2-c18c-4dc3-8797-d81a238db5b6" CreationDate="2010-03-12T08:17:12.740" UserDisplayName="benc" Text="Realistically, I doubt your dishwasher is comparable to even an iPod (original). Then again, an iPhone (original) probably has more RAM, storage, and processing power than any NeXT computer, much less most systems that run Windows 95. We'd allow someone ask about Windows 95, right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I still think the distinction has no underlying technical clarity, unless you think that you can cleanly classify an iPod as not a computer and an iPhone as a computer, when they have so much common technology. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The reason I came back to this meta thread was because someone had an iPhone (the computer to some people), but they could not get it to charge in some docks. The answer is related to the history of iPod hardware (which the Firewire vs. USB power charger transition). This question was closed, but shouldn't be open, because this is a technical problem with making a &quot;real&quot; computer work? And then if you did open it, then the same question, about an iPod nano 4G, would be closed, even though it is exactly the same problem, with the same answer..." />
  <row Id="915" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="520" RevisionGUID="d13ba0f2-c18c-4dc3-8797-d81a238db5b6" CreationDate="2010-03-12T08:17:12.740" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="509" RevisionGUID="d810fb0c-3659-4d67-ba5b-019ba1591cde" CreationDate="2009-08-21T14:47:16.210" UserDisplayName="Michael Pryor" Text="I would think these devices are computer related enough for inclusion on **Super User** (I'd even say they were computers).  Why are there 50 questions tagged iPod on superuser.com but this one gets closed at not computer related:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Closed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/26745/ipod-shuffle-3rd-generation-not-playing-files-till-the-end-closed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not closed (and not referencing a computer):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* http://superuser.com/questions/25169/can-an-ipod-transmit-to-my-cars-fm-radio (**now closed**)&#xD;&#xA;* http://superuser.com/questions/20158/ipod-click-wheel-unlock-code-reset&#xD;&#xA;* http://superuser.com/questions/2523/whats-a-good-replacement-for-my-first-generation-ipod-shuffle (**now closed**)&#xD;&#xA;* http://superuser.com/questions/21959/is-jailbreaking-an-ipod-touch-just-as-dangerous-as-an-iphone&#xD;&#xA;* http://superuser.com/questions/22698/what-hardware-for-listening-to-podcasts-in-car-and-on-foot&#xD;&#xA;* http://superuser.com/questions/23285/need-help-sorting-through-all-the-mp3-players-available&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems a bit ridiculous that if I can work in iTunes, or the OS of the computer my iPod syncs with that then the question is OK.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, see&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/13281/upgrade-order-for-new-computer-and-new-ipod&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is a question about a computer AND an iPod OK? But a question about an iPod alone should be closed?  Seems arbitrary.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also consider that howtogeek.com includes hundreds of questions on iPods (including [iPod Shuffle][1]s).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPod_Shuffle" />
  <row Id="917" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="509" RevisionGUID="d810fb0c-3659-4d67-ba5b-019ba1591cde" CreationDate="2009-08-21T14:47:16.210" UserDisplayName="Michael Pryor" Text="Are iPhone, iPod and iPod Touch questions computer related (Super User)?" />
  <row Id="918" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="509" RevisionGUID="d810fb0c-3659-4d67-ba5b-019ba1591cde" CreationDate="2009-08-21T14:47:16.210" UserDisplayName="Michael Pryor" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;faq&gt;" />
  <row Id="919" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="509" RevisionGUID="d810fb0c-3659-4d67-ba5b-019ba1591cde" CreationDate="2009-08-21T14:47:16.210" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="920" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="509" RevisionGUID="5f699845-8882-440e-96af-4a5d8542f7e6" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:45.547" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/16087/are-iphone-ipod-and-ipod-touch-questions-computer-related-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="522" RevisionGUID="1748f9ad-e1da-491f-95be-3d9ff95b4cc1" CreationDate="2009-08-21T15:38:07.057" UserDisplayName="random" Text="[Catch them all with the tilde (~)][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So &lt;kbd&gt;[windows~][2]&lt;/kbd&gt; will show you all of the following:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; - windows&#xD;&#xA; - windows-xp&#xD;&#xA; - windows-7&#xD;&#xA; - but then it goes qwayzee and you get **everything** that starts with &lt;kbd&gt;windows&lt;/kbd&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/1672/please-allow-wildcards-in-tag-searches&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows~" />
  <row Id="922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="523" RevisionGUID="8c8946a7-5d44-439c-9233-bde037ce86c0" CreationDate="2009-08-21T15:38:14.560" UserDisplayName="balpha" Text="If you're talking about the auto-conversion (i.e. a search for `bug` on MSO shows only questions tagged with `bug`): You can put the searchword in quotes to circumvent that: `&quot;bug&quot;`." />
  <row Id="923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="521" RevisionGUID="b20541a8-65c7-413d-b311-a814605f70dd" CreationDate="2009-08-21T15:33:36.660" UserDisplayName="WebDevHobo" Text="Uservoice was discontinued, so I come here with this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The concept behind superuser is somewhat different than that of Stackoverflow and Serverfault.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions about software are often limited to a certain OS.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if I go look for the tag &quot;Windows&quot;, I'll miss all questions tagged &quot;Windows-vista&quot; but not &quot;windows&quot;. I'll miss every post which has a varying name without having the Windows tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Same thing if I were looking for the tag &quot;search&quot;, all questions tagged only as &quot;searching&quot; would be left out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While not super-important, is there a way to counter this?" />
  <row Id="924" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="521" RevisionGUID="b20541a8-65c7-413d-b311-a814605f70dd" CreationDate="2009-08-21T15:33:36.660" UserDisplayName="WebDevHobo" Text="Tags problem for Superuser" />
  <row Id="925" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="521" RevisionGUID="b20541a8-65c7-413d-b311-a814605f70dd" CreationDate="2009-08-21T15:33:36.660" UserDisplayName="WebDevHobo" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;search&gt;" />
  <row Id="926" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="521" RevisionGUID="dd761715-b7d0-4bee-b67f-7584207ab24a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:47.220" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/16106/tags-problem-for-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="525" RevisionGUID="ddc466d9-7a8e-414a-8856-acf15d6569a0" CreationDate="2009-08-22T21:37:14.057" UserDisplayName="Mehrdad" Text="I'd say it's a not-computer-related question. For instance, a doctor might use a special program to remotely operate on a patient. A question about that program should not be on superuser. This is not much different. A Web site is just a special kind of application. Whether it's legal or not is not a technical question." />
  <row Id="928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="526" RevisionGUID="4c37348a-133b-4d6e-b61c-439b11c029ef" CreationDate="2009-08-22T21:38:28.187" UserDisplayName="phenry" Text="I would hope that it would be clear to all concerned that posts on Super User, or any of these sites, do not constitute formal legal opinions and should not be considered as such. Therefore, what's the problem?" />
  <row Id="929" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="527" RevisionGUID="5f47a608-5268-4477-87b1-ad4ef5e6a2d4" CreationDate="2009-08-22T21:44:52.637" UserDisplayName="Pollyanna" Text="I believe that Super Users are concerned with certain legal issues of file sharing and legitimate ways to purchase copyrighted material.  In any case, most superusers have had to deal with fixing friend's and relative's computers infected with adware and such from dubious file sharing services, and understand the possibility of credit card fraud from websites selling below cost merchandise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such I think it's a valid topic, though it shouldn't stray too far from what is known to be true.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-Adam" />
  <row Id="930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="528" RevisionGUID="2ad5ec62-95c9-4fb6-8c9b-b0a25da7f62b" CreationDate="2009-08-22T22:29:00.317" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="I would say beyond being &quot;not computer related&quot; is that it is technically &quot;too localized&quot; to some degree. Every country has different laws and can be interpreted differently. What is legal in one may not be in another. I would say close it or we need to make sure of the country in question." />
  <row Id="931" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="529" RevisionGUID="5203541a-1436-4ad3-a9f0-c57cbc284f56" CreationDate="2009-08-23T09:00:10.730" UserDisplayName="derobert" Text="No.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Calling a particular site illegal might be libelous (if untrue), and while SO can probably deflect liability with the CDA, the answerer can't. So, the &quot;no&quot; answer is risky, legally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Calling a particular site legal might get the answerer held liable if the questioner gets in trouble when it turns out otherwise. So, that's risky too (though, probably avoidable with appropriate disclaimers).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly, &quot;is X legal&quot; is not really a computer question, even when it involves web sites, and none of the SO sites have an audience educated (e.g., law school) to answer legal questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I strongly suggest closing legal questions pertaining to specific, identifiable entities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not a lawyer, this is not legal advice." />
  <row Id="932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="524" RevisionGUID="12586115-3e42-469e-b135-0001faaa268d" CreationDate="2009-08-22T21:33:31.787" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="A question was asked on SU regarding the legality of a specific site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Is mp3panda.com legal?](http://superuser.com/questions/27929/is-mp3panda-com-legal)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some users mentioned that we can't really confirm nor refute the legality of a website unless we know they are linked to illegal activity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should we allow these questions on the site? Or should they be closed as too localized, or subjective and argumentative?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="933" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="524" RevisionGUID="12586115-3e42-469e-b135-0001faaa268d" CreationDate="2009-08-22T21:33:31.787" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Should questions regarding the legality of a website be allowed on SU?" />
  <row Id="934" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="524" RevisionGUID="12586115-3e42-469e-b135-0001faaa268d" CreationDate="2009-08-22T21:33:31.787" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="935" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="524" RevisionGUID="cff2ba7c-8d01-48a2-88dd-0890dd64e77b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:47.440" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/16576/should-questions-regarding-the-legality-of-a-website-be-allowed-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="531" RevisionGUID="fdf3c319-087f-4164-8bfa-ac2918e7f7a5" CreationDate="2009-08-24T12:39:03.003" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="Strange I haven't noticed anything other than the recent increase in &quot;accepted answers&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I actually believe reputation is updated nearly instant, so the only thing I could think off are questions that are turned into community wiki. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though it would unfair if the additional upvotes weren't counted when you got below the daily threshold again." />
  <row Id="937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="532" RevisionGUID="271d0b8d-61a4-4c33-bde8-283cdfbcd670" CreationDate="2009-08-24T12:48:29.830" UserDisplayName="random" Text="The votes folding back might have been due to a [detected voting anomaly][1] which would explain the blip and blup. Could have been sockpuppets were voting on your posts, or there may have been a user voting you up a ton and not realising it's not helping you out in the long run for such a burst like that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can read it in the new book out now in search with such salient chapters as, &quot;[What is vote fraud?][2]&quot; and &quot;[What's the point of voting people up if it's just reversed?][3]&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/03/more-voting-anomalies/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/3843/what-is-a-vote-fraud&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/16045/whats-the-point-of-voting-people-up-if-its-just-reversed" />
  <row Id="938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="530" RevisionGUID="b26a848a-6c6b-406e-8c54-2031576b78de" CreationDate="2009-08-24T12:23:32.383" UserDisplayName="nik" Text="For the last three days I find that my reputation is increased to nearly its daily cap sometime around mid-day. But, later this gets rolled back.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at my rep history for the day when this spiked reputation is around,  &#xD;&#xA;I found that there was a series of upvotes over a short period of time,  &#xD;&#xA;typically one upvote per answer/question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today I also found that the spike after it was rolled back showed that I had also missed an upvote 3 hours back because I must have reached the daily-cap while this 'spike' was around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, my questions.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Is this something others have noticed with their Superuser accounts?&#xD;&#xA;- Does this make 'reputation' something of an approximation rather than a true-present value?&#xD;&#xA;  - I am assuming here that reputation lost in this way will be added the next time such a recheck occurs&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;Aside: I also got the Meta-is-Murder maintenance page on the Meta site couple of times over the last two days -- leading me to assume Meta was down for maintenance. Apparently it was working fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;**Update**: Thanks for those pointers `random`.  &#xD;&#xA;The two stackoverflow posts on [Voting Anomalies][1] &amp; [Fraud][2] are good reference.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some observations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. I checked that the rollback of reputation [has quite neatly carved out specific votes from a time-window][3] &#xD;&#xA;- some other votes which I got during that period are properly accounted&#xD;&#xA;- I presume that the anomaly detection identified a specific 'source' that pushed the votes and canceled their activity&#xD;&#xA;- Will check to see if the missed rep gets accounted correctly in the next round&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/03/more-voting-anomalies/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2008/12/vote-fraud-and-you/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/16045/whats-the-point-of-voting-people-up-if-its-just-reversed/16050#16050" />
  <row Id="939" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="530" RevisionGUID="b26a848a-6c6b-406e-8c54-2031576b78de" CreationDate="2009-08-24T12:23:32.383" UserDisplayName="nik" Text="Has anyone seen a reputation jitter on Superuser lately?" />
  <row Id="940" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="530" RevisionGUID="b26a848a-6c6b-406e-8c54-2031576b78de" CreationDate="2009-08-24T12:23:32.383" UserDisplayName="nik" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;&lt;daily-limit&gt;" />
  <row Id="941" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="530" RevisionGUID="a9353588-8286-4219-8e00-35626bebd31d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:47.803" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/16858/has-anyone-seen-a-reputation-jitter-on-superuser-lately" Text="" />
  <row Id="942" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="534" RevisionGUID="649b9ddc-95e2-4ea0-917a-79f2bb917a72" CreationDate="2009-08-25T02:50:34.220" UserDisplayName="Ian Elliott" Text="Flag it for moderator attention. " />
  <row Id="943" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="535" RevisionGUID="6b7efcb1-c9a2-43db-9305-e223674a1aa7" CreationDate="2009-08-25T03:25:04.670" Text="Yes please flag profusely! That's what flagging is there for, and we look at all of them!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't guarantee the moderators will *agree* with you, but we do look at them and if enough flags appear we know it's serious." />
  <row Id="944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="536" RevisionGUID="8fd7a971-70e0-4336-94c3-d531d3324e56" CreationDate="2009-08-25T03:52:12.770" UserDisplayName="joshhunt" Text="First off, is it illegal? Is it immoral?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is an [entire section](http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/jailbreak) of Super User devoted to breaking the TOS of hardware that I believe are perfectly legitimate questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't believe that the hotel internet question on SuperUser on Super User should have been closed. It asked a common, legitimate question that does address a concern of many people. If someone was Googling this topic, wondering if it was possible or not, hopefully they would come across the Super User question and see that it might not be the best thing to do*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;*I know it is wishfull thinking that we are going to chage these peoples opinion's, but it still is a valid point&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** &#xD;&#xA;I guess in the end I am up for questions of this kind, as long as the answer is &quot;don't do it.&quot; I know that is kind of censoring the answers, but I do beleive there should be questions on Super User addressing issues such as these, stating that stealing wi-fi or bypassing Windows' activation is wrong (if not illegal)." />
  <row Id="945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="537" RevisionGUID="4c514060-488c-4935-8b67-75bd73342918" CreationDate="2009-08-25T04:24:57.687" UserDisplayName="hyperslug" Text="As long as we spell out the Superuser policy on which TOS violations are permitted, this will be easier.  I gather,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Circumventing Microsoft OS activations: no&#xD;&#xA;- Jailbreaking iPhones: yes&#xD;&#xA;- Stealing hotel internet: no&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="538" RevisionGUID="35e9bc22-dd12-4ff6-a02d-13b36f15a9ca" CreationDate="2009-08-25T08:16:44.410" UserDisplayName="Ralph Rickenbach" Text="I fullheartedly agree with [joshhunt's answer][1]. I know this is a far stretch. Yet I have been in and expect to go to countries where the country itself behaves immoral and it might be to an extent necessary for your own life's sake to circumvent official communication routes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would love to know whether circumventing hotel access controls will probably help preventing &quot;the powers that are&quot; to track me down. I'm pretty sure it won't, but many people think it does. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/17170/handling-questions-that-are-clearly-trying-to-break-some-kind-of-policy-tos-etc/17181#17181" />
  <row Id="947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="533" RevisionGUID="a1c2766b-d938-4f4d-b8ab-4d586eb75887" CreationDate="2009-08-25T02:47:22.040" UserDisplayName="jtimberman" Text="How should we as a community handle questions that are clearly trying to circumvent policy, controls, terms of service, etc?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[This question][1] on superuser is *specifically* asking how to circumvent the access controls on Hotel Internet. I would think this kind of topic should be shut down immediately, as good community citizens would want to do what is ethical and in some cases legal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/29162/is-it-possible-to-hack-internet-blocks-at-hotels" />
  <row Id="948" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="533" RevisionGUID="a1c2766b-d938-4f4d-b8ab-4d586eb75887" CreationDate="2009-08-25T02:47:22.040" UserDisplayName="jtimberman" Text="Handling questions that are clearly trying to break some kind of policy, TOS, etc?" />
  <row Id="949" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="533" RevisionGUID="a1c2766b-d938-4f4d-b8ab-4d586eb75887" CreationDate="2009-08-25T02:47:22.040" UserDisplayName="jtimberman" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="950" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="533" RevisionGUID="f461e8ec-35ad-4638-bbac-1ac0573f3706" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:48.183" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/17170/handling-questions-that-are-clearly-trying-to-break-some-kind-of-policy-tos-etc" Text="" />
  <row Id="951" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="540" RevisionGUID="dde5d63d-167f-49c7-bb8a-d8783f8020ae" CreationDate="2009-08-25T10:09:00.613" UserDisplayName="Jonik" Text="Yeah, I agree about going with `command-line`. (It's the better option for a couple of reasons, one small one being consistency between SU and SO: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/command-line.)" />
  <row Id="952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="541" RevisionGUID="374a1b65-b1bd-4d53-a54d-6ab0193ba210" CreationDate="2009-08-25T10:10:03.653" UserDisplayName="random" Text="In favour of &lt;kbd&gt;command-line&lt;/kbd&gt; only because it's less of a jumarble of the words when reading. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Feeling is that tags that are multiple words should just include the hyphen (-) instead of jammingthemallintoonewordfor the sake of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also &lt;kbd&gt;cmd&lt;/kbd&gt; to consider, and from the looks of things, deal with the command line anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="542" RevisionGUID="668a94bd-9bde-405b-bdce-03a4e76e40d7" CreationDate="2009-08-25T10:12:30.340" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Merged &lt;kbd&gt;commandline&lt;/kbd&gt; into &lt;kbd&gt;command-line&lt;/kbd&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;Merged &lt;kbd&gt;cmd&lt;/kbd&gt; into &lt;kbd&gt;command-line&lt;/kbd&gt;" />
  <row Id="954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="539" RevisionGUID="3ebfdccb-e437-484e-940a-16fac1796084" CreationDate="2009-08-25T10:03:37.283" UserDisplayName="nagul" Text="There are 15 questions tagged command-line and 33 tagged commandline. I think command-line is clearer, but the two tags should be rolled up either way." />
  <row Id="955" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="539" RevisionGUID="3ebfdccb-e437-484e-940a-16fac1796084" CreationDate="2009-08-25T10:03:37.283" UserDisplayName="nagul" Text="Please change the commandline tag to command-line" />
  <row Id="956" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="539" RevisionGUID="3ebfdccb-e437-484e-940a-16fac1796084" CreationDate="2009-08-25T10:03:37.283" UserDisplayName="nagul" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="957" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="539" RevisionGUID="9f8dd2b8-72bf-4d76-bb15-a86f5d41d4c2" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:48.753" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/17237/please-change-the-commandline-tag-to-command-line" Text="" />
  <row Id="958" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="544" RevisionGUID="32e81c9b-a75d-4d85-a742-cc4331a875c5" CreationDate="2009-08-25T12:25:46.337" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="When you click on the Migrated to link it will take you to the question on the new site. You can then follow it from there. (The superuser part in the bit below points to the new location for the question)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;migrated to superuser.com 1 hour ago&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/pre&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This particular question already has some answers on SU and I have also edited it to be more accurate. Your reputation earned from this point forward will count towards your SU reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The migration process is discussed in detail [here](http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/migrate-questions-between-websites/) on the StackOverflow Blog.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="545" RevisionGUID="799b2ed4-ed2c-4c93-9941-bac69c053196" CreationDate="2009-08-25T12:33:19.080" UserDisplayName="Ralph Rickenbach" Text="You should search for the migrated question. If you have enough reputation on the new site, you can vote to migrate it back. You can repost the question with some rewording to make it fitting for the page selected. There is a link on the closed question to the new one to follow and find it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are acceptable questions on each site? You find that information on each site's FAQ:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - meta&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If your question is about:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Stack Overflow Server Fault Super User&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ... it is welcome here. No question is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; too trivial or too &quot;newbie&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - StackOverflow (SO)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Programming questions, of course! As&#xD;&#xA;&gt; long as your question is:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; detailed and specific written clearly&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and simply of interest to at least one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; other programmer somewhere ... it is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; welcome here. No question is too&#xD;&#xA;&gt; trivial or too &quot;newbie&quot;. Oh yes, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it should be about programming. You&#xD;&#xA;&gt; know, with a computer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Serverfault (SF)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Server Fault is for system&#xD;&#xA;&gt; administrators and IT professionals,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; people who manage or maintain&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computers in a professional capacity.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you are in charge of ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; servers networks many desktop PCs&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (other than your own) ... then you're&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in the right place to ask your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; question! Well, as long as the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; question is about your servers, your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; networks, or desktops you support,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Please note that Server Fault is not&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for general computer troubleshooting&#xD;&#xA;&gt; questions; if you paid for that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; desktop hardware, and it's your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; personal workstation, it is unlikely&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that your question is appropriate for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Server Fault.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Superuser (SU)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is for computer enthusiasts&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and power users. If you have a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; question about ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; computer hardware computer software …&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and it is not about videogames or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; consoles, then you're in the right&#xD;&#xA;&gt; place to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I strongly feel that questions can be posted on multiple sites, if you expect to get corresponding answers from different communities. see [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/4708/what-to-do-with-cross-site-duplicates/4712#4712" />
  <row Id="960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="543" RevisionGUID="596ba863-e035-4981-b5bb-4c3c0251f7e5" CreationDate="2009-08-25T12:24:38.273" UserDisplayName="keisimone" Text="I got a question that got migrated from SO to SP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;what do i do after that? repost?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;look for the migrated question?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;can somebody do a slightly detailed explanation with good examples what type of questions should be posted to which website? :S" />
  <row Id="961" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="543" RevisionGUID="596ba863-e035-4981-b5bb-4c3c0251f7e5" CreationDate="2009-08-25T12:24:38.273" UserDisplayName="keisimone" Text="question got migrated from stackoverflow to superuser. what should i do? repost?" />
  <row Id="962" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="543" RevisionGUID="596ba863-e035-4981-b5bb-4c3c0251f7e5" CreationDate="2009-08-25T12:24:38.273" UserDisplayName="keisimone" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="963" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="543" RevisionGUID="02d657e7-949a-4e45-9a8f-18924e516a85" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:48.987" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/17265/question-got-migrated-from-stackoverflow-to-superuser-what-should-i-do-repost" Text="" />
  <row Id="964" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="547" RevisionGUID="87937c87-85c5-40b4-b481-3d90b9ed455d" CreationDate="2009-08-25T12:47:39.323" UserDisplayName="Timothy Carter" Text="Excel is not the only spreadsheet, if someone were asking about a different spreadsheet program or looking for a spreadsheet program, what tag should they use? I think they both should stay." />
  <row Id="965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="549" RevisionGUID="5cb7ed77-6cd4-452f-ad43-3ce99350c5fc" CreationDate="2009-08-25T12:50:19.040" UserDisplayName="Ralph Rickenbach" Text="Obviously there are more spreadsheets than just excel, so I would leave the tag there. There **will be questions about open office calc at some point**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Tagging systems are there to help find questions. They categorize questions. And they are community driven, so let the community decide.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If these tags were duplicates (excel, ms-excel, microsoft-excel), I would fold them together again to help finding questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As tags are suggested when we start typing in the tag list, the spreadsheet tag being available will push people in the direction of using it when writing about any spreadsheet. Maybe they already found it when searching for their question and use it therefore. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is omitted now, old questions will not be tagged accordingly in the future when others reinvent the tag. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So leave it, as the community has decided to use it." />
  <row Id="966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="548" RevisionGUID="2aeb2217-bf43-4ec3-b1e7-5b5f1d7ed868" CreationDate="2009-08-25T12:49:44.050" UserDisplayName="random" Text="This would be like saying all photocopies are Xeroxes, that all tissues are Kleenexes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just because there's a Microsoft product for spreadsheets called Excel doesn't mean that all spreadsheets are Excel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OpenOffice.org has their own spreadsheet software, Calc. Should questions on Calc be retagged as Excel?" />
  <row Id="967" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="546" RevisionGUID="449c5a93-53fe-4bf1-864e-5dff802b6817" CreationDate="2009-08-25T12:44:38.357" UserDisplayName="Shaharyar" Text="As I just asked a question on Excel, I saw that the tag &lt;kbd&gt;spreadsheet&lt;/kbd&gt; had 3 questions (which are also about excel) and that &lt;kbd&gt;excel&lt;/kbd&gt; has 50 questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It feels redundant." />
  <row Id="968" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="546" RevisionGUID="449c5a93-53fe-4bf1-864e-5dff802b6817" CreationDate="2009-08-25T12:44:38.357" UserDisplayName="Shaharyar" Text="Please merge the excel and spreadsheet tags on SuperUser" />
  <row Id="969" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="546" RevisionGUID="449c5a93-53fe-4bf1-864e-5dff802b6817" CreationDate="2009-08-25T12:44:38.357" UserDisplayName="Shaharyar" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="970" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="546" RevisionGUID="7597a745-4cf1-4183-be4a-70948df27a6d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:49.247" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/17273/please-merge-the-excel-and-spreadsheet-tags-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="551" RevisionGUID="e5a45ddd-b87f-4a01-b2c6-b9797aee86d9" CreationDate="2009-08-25T18:55:05.917" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Valid point. However in the past some questions have been re-opened and allowed. Even Jeff himself closes them and doesn't delete them. In some cases there are a very gray area and other moderators may decide to re-open a question if they feel it is valid.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been under fire a lot lately for closing gaming and phone question irrelevant of the content, as I believe keeping just one question open makes it extremely hard to enforce a rule when others ask similar questions. This is becoming a very heated debate at the moment." />
  <row Id="972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="552" RevisionGUID="e933db52-f059-4ac9-96c5-665011956b3b" CreationDate="2009-08-25T18:59:38.357" UserDisplayName="MunkiPhD" Text="Depends on the type of game question.  If it relates to getting the game to run under certain conditions and specific hardware, it *might* be legitimate question and should therefore be reviewed.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, if it's a &quot;how do i g3ts sturcraft 4?&quot; it's most likely to get shot at like a turkey before Thanksgiving and closed up like a car dealership." />
  <row Id="973" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="554" RevisionGUID="040e1f8f-ef57-4482-84a2-3599cb75ea58" CreationDate="2009-08-25T23:53:18.777" UserDisplayName="dmckee" Text="A quick look at the leader board and I note that there are **no** 10k reputations on the site as yet. So only moderators can delete. Wait a couple of weeks..." />
  <row Id="974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="553" RevisionGUID="7f524fe5-7276-45a9-a634-ff84a1ebb4ca" CreationDate="2009-08-25T19:12:33.167" UserDisplayName="EBGreen" Text="They are left there to mark the boundary that must not be crossed. Much as headhunters might mark their teritory with shrunken heads mounted on spears." />
  <row Id="975" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="550" RevisionGUID="afe8a95d-6eca-4978-84b8-21ec7ff7c514" CreationDate="2009-08-25T18:52:31.647" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="This is a thought that came to mind after seeing the daily couple gaming questions that come into SU. If the rules state that most gaming questions are not within the scope of the site, why don't we just delete those questions instead of close them and leave them laying around?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just for reference, link to one of Jeff's answers: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/1867/do-closed-question-ever-get-deleted/5045#5045" />
  <row Id="976" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="550" RevisionGUID="afe8a95d-6eca-4978-84b8-21ec7ff7c514" CreationDate="2009-08-25T18:52:31.647" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="Why are game questions on SU just closed and not deleted?" />
  <row Id="977" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="550" RevisionGUID="afe8a95d-6eca-4978-84b8-21ec7ff7c514" CreationDate="2009-08-25T18:52:31.647" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;&lt;deleted-questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="978" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="550" RevisionGUID="345b1bc6-a89a-4e52-b4f6-757d68fbb04e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:49.713" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/17488/why-are-game-questions-on-su-just-closed-and-not-deleted" Text="" />
  <row Id="979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="556" RevisionGUID="cc2b3962-98b8-49b9-a1bd-cf6595296316" CreationDate="2009-08-27T12:11:30.880" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="Why can't you make it yourself? I would personally love to see a dark-theme alternative." />
  <row Id="980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="557" RevisionGUID="435042db-73d6-44c5-8a5c-39ca2b03c39a" CreationDate="2009-08-27T14:42:43.200" UserDisplayName="sudeshpawar" Text="I was able to do it.&#xD;&#xA;All I did was installed DARK Grey Lady style for Wikipedia from &#xD;&#xA;http://userstyles.org/styles/1365&#xD;&#xA;and added following lines in the list of domains. It just worked fine for me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     domain(superuser.com),&#xD;&#xA;     domain(stackoverflow.com)," />
  <row Id="981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="555" RevisionGUID="0c08077d-060d-44f7-a0dc-49a459d45d46" CreationDate="2009-08-27T12:06:28.177" UserDisplayName="sudeshpawar" Text="Stylish is a Firefox  Add-on that lets you install and manage user styles. User styles exist mainly to change the way things look. They are written with CSS, the same language that web sites use to control their appearance. This addon can be installed from https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2108&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel more comfortable looking at black/dark backgrounds. So I have installed dark styles for many frequently used sites. Can I get one such Dark color scheme customized for superuser.com web pages. &#xD;&#xA;Example there is a of Black color scheme for google web pages is here: http://userstyles.org/styles/1693&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="555" RevisionGUID="0c08077d-060d-44f7-a0dc-49a459d45d46" CreationDate="2009-08-27T12:06:28.177" UserDisplayName="sudeshpawar" Text="Dark color scheme for Superuser.com web pages" />
  <row Id="983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="555" RevisionGUID="0c08077d-060d-44f7-a0dc-49a459d45d46" CreationDate="2009-08-27T12:06:28.177" UserDisplayName="sudeshpawar" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;color&gt;&lt;feature&gt;" />
  <row Id="984" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="555" RevisionGUID="d58caccd-6ab2-4085-a0f3-d4468c7b8844" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:50.373" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/18070/dark-color-scheme-for-superuser-com-web-pages" Text="" />
  <row Id="985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="559" RevisionGUID="a99d0e46-0704-4923-9402-f6e2d81b4d88" CreationDate="2009-08-27T12:50:41.660" UserDisplayName="devinb" Text="Display could refer to anything you're displaying on. (Blackberry, iphone, touchtv, surface). Monitor refers to a specific TYPE of display" />
  <row Id="986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="560" RevisionGUID="129d663c-dbdd-4a8c-af96-7cb6174f02dc" CreationDate="2009-08-27T13:03:26.980" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="A quick glance at the questions tagged `display` showed at least (3) talking about the UI of an application, (2) talking about HDTVs, (2) talking about laptop screens (not normally referred to as &quot;monitors&quot;), and at least (1) talking about projectors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Display&quot; is definitely *not* being used consistently as a synonym for &quot;monitor&quot;." />
  <row Id="987" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="561" RevisionGUID="5fa32385-467c-4f2f-a571-76d48b7a2cdf" CreationDate="2009-09-21T11:30:29.067" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I had a look at these questions. &lt;kbd&gt;display&lt;/kbd&gt; and &lt;kbd&gt;monitor&lt;/kbd&gt; should remain separate tags as in most cases they are not used as synonyms, and where they are there is enough users with tag editing power to fix the anomalies. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where &lt;kbd&gt;display&lt;/kbd&gt; and &lt;kbd&gt;monitor&lt;/kbd&gt; is used, the most relevant one must be chosen and applied. I have gone through these and re-tagged so they should not be there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="988" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="558" RevisionGUID="2d4f2cc0-b0b0-421f-ad08-810514b7bed2" CreationDate="2009-08-27T12:46:12.030" UserDisplayName="Jonik" Text="**[Monitor][wiki-monitor]** and **[display][wiki-display]**, for practical purposes, mean the same thing, right? I propose that these two tags be merged on Super User. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [**`[monitor]`**][monitor] × 85  &#xD;&#xA;- [**`[display]`**][display] × 35  &#xD;&#xA;- [**`[monitor]`** &amp; **`[display]`**][both]  7  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Probably go with **`[monitor]`** as it's clearly the more popular one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you disagree, please suggest an alternative approach for solving the overlap between the tags. (In any case *most* current uses of the **`[display]`** tag are as synonym of **`[monitor]`**.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[wiki-monitor]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_monitor&#xD;&#xA;[wiki-display]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_display&#xD;&#xA;[monitor]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/monitor&#xD;&#xA;[display]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/display&#xD;&#xA;[both]:    http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/monitor+display" />
  <row Id="989" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="558" RevisionGUID="2d4f2cc0-b0b0-421f-ad08-810514b7bed2" CreationDate="2009-08-27T12:46:12.030" UserDisplayName="Jonik" Text="Should the “monitor” and “display” tags on Super User be merged?" />
  <row Id="990" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="558" RevisionGUID="2d4f2cc0-b0b0-421f-ad08-810514b7bed2" CreationDate="2009-08-27T12:46:12.030" UserDisplayName="Jonik" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-declined&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="991" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="558" RevisionGUID="596e42b0-1492-4eef-bed7-c885cff1cf6d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:50.817" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/18077/should-the-monitor-and-display-tags-on-super-user-be-merged" Text="" />
  <row Id="992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="563" RevisionGUID="100fefec-7628-4e9a-be26-ced4b546788d" CreationDate="2009-08-28T11:37:23.303" UserDisplayName="Michael Borgwardt" Text="Because the sites each have a different content and audience focus. See the [FAQ][1] for details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/faq" />
  <row Id="993" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="564" RevisionGUID="fd68ebb6-bc12-4981-a917-22bbca454985" CreationDate="2009-08-28T11:38:24.767" UserDisplayName="phoenix" Text="If the question is related to a computer hardware or software in general then they belong to superuser.com" />
  <row Id="994" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="565" RevisionGUID="09112fcb-b978-454c-9399-939236cf4dfb" CreationDate="2009-08-28T11:43:03.383" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Because SuperUser is for questions that are from a general hardware or software perspective. Many people will mistakenly think that StackOverflow is going to help them with making their computer work, so we will migrate it to our other site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, ServerFault exists for questions that are more networking and SysAdmin related." />
  <row Id="995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="562" RevisionGUID="9cc0ce8c-69e0-4ba4-80a0-8a08c3ba1845" CreationDate="2009-08-28T11:36:03.460" UserDisplayName="Preeti" Text="For the last few days now, I've seen some questions either closed or moved to SuperUser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is that?" />
  <row Id="996" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="562" RevisionGUID="9cc0ce8c-69e0-4ba4-80a0-8a08c3ba1845" CreationDate="2009-08-28T11:36:03.460" UserDisplayName="Preeti" Text="Why are questions moved to SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="997" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="562" RevisionGUID="9cc0ce8c-69e0-4ba4-80a0-8a08c3ba1845" CreationDate="2009-08-28T11:36:03.460" UserDisplayName="Preeti" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="998" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="562" RevisionGUID="4c44b793-3e34-424d-8803-cf44363aad79" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:51.200" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/18434/why-are-questions-moved-to-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="567" RevisionGUID="65b76f77-fc08-4bd1-9413-88d855df0efb" CreationDate="2009-08-28T14:31:10.860" UserDisplayName="Weblog" Text="The flag for moderator attention isn't supposed to be a harsh thing. Use it whenever you think something needs to be done that you yourself can't do.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, feel free to use the moderator flag in the following situations (and many more!):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* You see a post that has an abusive tag (&lt;kbd&gt;please-send-teh-codez&lt;/kbd&gt;) but you don't have 250 reputation points yet&#xD;&#xA;* You see a post that needs to be migrated&#xD;&#xA;* You see a post that needs to be closed&#xD;&#xA;* You feel someone is abusing the voting mechanism&#xD;&#xA;* A user has somehow created multiple accounts that need merging&#xD;&#xA;* You want your reputation recalculated&#xD;&#xA;* You see similar questions that might be merged&#xD;&#xA;* A question should be made community wiki" />
  <row Id="1000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="568" RevisionGUID="df0641c7-cb96-481a-957d-6f9a1500e2b3" CreationDate="2009-08-28T14:31:29.877" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="The correct thing *is* to flag it for moderator attention and explain the situation. In this case, I'd recommend merging the migrated question into the question that he re-asked since it looks like he doesn't have ownership of the migrated question, and since both questions have answers." />
  <row Id="1001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="569" RevisionGUID="1b69ef43-3621-4ad4-92fc-5d9ab7ab6492" CreationDate="2009-08-28T14:31:52.853" UserDisplayName="Thomas Owens" Text="Flag for moderator, explaining it. The moderator will (I hope, at least) just close one of the two questions as a duplicate of the other, depending on which one has answers/upvotes." />
  <row Id="1002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="570" RevisionGUID="549f1105-c161-440d-9b76-5077803dec1c" CreationDate="2009-08-28T15:14:48.040" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I have merged the two questions. Interestingly they were one question ID apart. Well spotted." />
  <row Id="1003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="566" RevisionGUID="7306e4e2-115e-4cbc-bb2b-d1820a8354dc" CreationDate="2009-08-28T14:27:39.650" UserDisplayName="Rob Allen" Text="This question [here][1] was migrated to SU _after_ the OP, listening to a comment left for him, asked the same [question there already][2]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have the rep to vote to close on SU, and I flag for moderator attention seems a bit harsh. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;** Update **&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks, I flagged the migrated version and included the question # in the explanation. The full link was too long for the text box.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/31361/how-to-calibrate-my-monitor&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/31360/how-to-calibrate-my-monitor" />
  <row Id="1004" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="566" RevisionGUID="7306e4e2-115e-4cbc-bb2b-d1820a8354dc" CreationDate="2009-08-28T14:27:39.650" UserDisplayName="Rob Allen" Text="What to do when a user asks the same question on two SO Family sites and the original gets migrated" />
  <row Id="1005" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="566" RevisionGUID="7306e4e2-115e-4cbc-bb2b-d1820a8354dc" CreationDate="2009-08-28T14:27:39.650" UserDisplayName="Rob Allen" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;moderators&gt;" />
  <row Id="1006" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="566" RevisionGUID="73374292-d0ae-48e0-8534-057e8c26d29d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:51.573" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/18488/what-to-do-when-a-user-asks-the-same-question-on-two-so-family-sites-and-the-orig" Text="" />
  <row Id="1007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="572" RevisionGUID="d98210f4-511d-480b-80de-44f428f3e90f" CreationDate="2009-08-29T17:56:27.973" UserDisplayName="Eric" Text="From what I remember of the Office episode where Dwight was playing Second Life, it looked like a vidja game to me. I imagine if I had asked for help setting up a TF2 server on SuperUser, it would get the exact same response. How is this different?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the record, I find TF2 servers a *much* more worthwhile endeavor than Second Life servers. But that's just me." />
  <row Id="1008" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="573" RevisionGUID="157a2b80-97e6-4ec0-af87-054c41325d87" CreationDate="2009-08-29T19:15:51.760" UserDisplayName="hyperslug" Text="&lt;em&gt;Technically&lt;/em&gt;, it's not a game, although their home page does include &quot;play&quot; as a use, along with shop, explore, work, learn etc.  They [bill themselves][1] as&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; an online, 3D virtual world imagined&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and created by its Residents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the Internet's largest user-created,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3D virtual world community.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've tried it out before just to see what all the hoopla was about, and I get the impression it's a chat room on steroids.  At any rate, BrianLy's question wasn't about the gaming aspect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://secondlife.com/" />
  <row Id="1009" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="574" RevisionGUID="ec94cabc-a4a4-412f-b9cc-1d5580a8335b" CreationDate="2009-08-29T19:51:49.707" UserDisplayName="tangurena" Text="One of my past co-workers was making &quot;a couple hundred dollars&quot; per month selling stuff in Second Life. He mostly wrote code to make gun type things and explosing things. There are other people making and selling textures, clothing and other stuff for your in game avatar. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To answer the question that you've posed on the other 2 boards, my advice is to contact Linden Labs. Based on what I know and understand, the code running on their servers is closed source and not available for making &quot;private shards.&quot; " />
  <row Id="1010" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="571" RevisionGUID="4ac2751f-814c-436a-87c3-3bb42715c2b7" CreationDate="2009-08-29T17:50:41.870" UserDisplayName="BrianLy" Text="I did a total dumbass thing and asked a [question on stackoverflow about Second Life][1]. Then it was [moved to superuser.com][2] and was closed because it related to video games. I don't see how this was related to video gaming. Someone got a good answer in before it was closed but I think the behaviour was not really appropriate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Update: I don't quite understand why people feel that Second Life is a video game, and not a colloration tool. Yes there is cross-over but it's not purely for entertainment. Jeff Barr at Amazon Web Services hosts meetings with it, and [it's used in education][3]. Second Life is generally considered to be a virtual world and not a video game. It would appear that users here lack a sophisticated understanding of the differences. My original question is the sort that a lot of people are bound to ask if they are interested in this area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1347782/second-life-is-there-a-way-to-run-my-own-server-inside-the-firewall&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/31423/second-life-is-there-a-way-to-run-my-own-server-inside-the-firewall&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.google.com/search?q=virtual+worlds+in+education" />
  <row Id="1011" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="571" RevisionGUID="4ac2751f-814c-436a-87c3-3bb42715c2b7" CreationDate="2009-08-29T17:50:41.870" UserDisplayName="BrianLy" Text="Question closed because superusers think Second Life is a video game (it's a virtual world)" />
  <row Id="1012" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="571" RevisionGUID="4ac2751f-814c-436a-87c3-3bb42715c2b7" CreationDate="2009-08-29T17:50:41.870" UserDisplayName="BrianLy" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;etiquette&gt;&lt;behavior&gt;" />
  <row Id="1013" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="571" RevisionGUID="19777e81-b314-4f98-a970-6b8a47c9a6f2" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:52.017" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/18764/question-closed-because-superusers-think-second-life-is-a-video-game-its-a-virt" Text="" />
  <row Id="1014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="576" RevisionGUID="ecd7b251-d818-4bca-8c7e-5e1d39838cce" CreationDate="2009-08-30T00:19:16.577" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Mobile phone questions are generally frowned upon unless you are asking how to perform some actions with them along with a computer. For example: asking how to download images from a phone onto a pc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand, smart phones like Blackberries, iPhones, Windows Mobile devices, those are generally much more accepted because they can fit into the definition of a consumer computer much more easily." />
  <row Id="1015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="575" RevisionGUID="c59d8830-3916-4c89-b31c-94d39f532435" CreationDate="2009-08-29T23:55:27.237" UserDisplayName="flybywire" Text="What &quot;mobile&quot; questions are suitable for superuser.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I ask how to configure a certain handset model so that the alarm clock rings in vibrate mode, then it seems to me this is 100% mobile and not computer related.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I ask how to setup email-fetching from my company server for a certain handset, this does seems computer related.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where is the limit, what mobile questions, if at all, should be asked in superuser.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1016" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="575" RevisionGUID="c59d8830-3916-4c89-b31c-94d39f532435" CreationDate="2009-08-29T23:55:27.237" UserDisplayName="flybywire" Text="What &quot;mobile&quot; questions are good for superuser.com?" />
  <row Id="1017" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="575" RevisionGUID="c59d8830-3916-4c89-b31c-94d39f532435" CreationDate="2009-08-29T23:55:27.237" UserDisplayName="flybywire" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="1018" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="575" RevisionGUID="ddc787c1-aa6e-4180-8a42-1f2058d15917" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:52.740" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/18798/what-mobile-questions-are-good-for-superuser-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="1019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="578" RevisionGUID="fda43193-ead8-4b61-a5c6-e35749174f81" CreationDate="2009-08-30T22:51:09.063" UserDisplayName="Ólafur Waage" Text="Aye I agree. A change in contrast like that tells your eyes that there are objects there needing to focus on. Instead being a more softer contrast between white and grey (like here on MSO)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Specially with it having rounded corners, telling your eyes that it's a complex object." />
  <row Id="1020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="579" RevisionGUID="bcf292ce-2068-4c5d-b2af-13b2594fa39c" CreationDate="2009-08-30T23:04:29.643" UserDisplayName="Matt Hamilton" Text="I kind of wish the tags (on all the sites) didn't have a border or background colour. Sure, they'd look similar to the &quot;link|flag&quot; text at the bottom of each post, but they're just metadata and shouldn't be so obtrusive. Reducing the border width is a good start.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SF's &quot;tooltip&quot; coloured tags are the best across all the sites IMHO." />
  <row Id="1021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="577" RevisionGUID="096f2512-977b-4ce5-9e2f-1b7d64243748" CreationDate="2009-08-30T22:36:47.030" UserDisplayName="August Lilleaas" Text="The tags on superuser has a 3-4 px thick blue border. Because of this, I find lists of questions a bit hard to read compared to stackoverflow.com. The border takes the focus away from the titles, enough to be a little annoying.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about giving them a thinner border, a lighter colored border, or removing the border altogether?" />
  <row Id="1022" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="577" RevisionGUID="096f2512-977b-4ce5-9e2f-1b7d64243748" CreationDate="2009-08-30T22:36:47.030" UserDisplayName="August Lilleaas" Text="Tag styling on superuser" />
  <row Id="1023" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="577" RevisionGUID="096f2512-977b-4ce5-9e2f-1b7d64243748" CreationDate="2009-08-30T22:36:47.030" UserDisplayName="August Lilleaas" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;style&gt;" />
  <row Id="1024" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="577" RevisionGUID="da5b0c22-5783-4643-b550-6b6bf84f5504" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:53.063" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/18985/tag-styling-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1025" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="581" RevisionGUID="01d2ff6a-6090-43b8-8737-451bbd5cc627" CreationDate="2009-09-03T18:26:12.940" UserDisplayName="marcgg" Text="I wouldn't say horrific but it's definitively my least favorite of the stack websites." />
  <row Id="1026" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="582" RevisionGUID="b8ccd651-733f-42ea-960a-f11542f070ee" CreationDate="2009-09-03T18:30:34.943" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="Once you log in, you won't see the yellow bar at the top (except when you are notified of something) and the &quot;Welcome!&quot; box on the side is gone. When that's done, I find that SuperUser has a very attractive color scheme. And I don't mind the yellow much because it's meant to get my attention and be dismissed, and not be a fixture of the overall design." />
  <row Id="1027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="583" RevisionGUID="9ad82f18-e6d9-4de8-a043-e05163c58692" CreationDate="2009-09-03T18:31:11.963" UserDisplayName="tvanfosson" Text="I'd prefer that all SO sites use jQuery UI theming and give us the ability to switch themes on the fly.  This would also make it easy to create new themes with [ThemeRoller][1] and nominate them for inclusion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://jqueryui.com/themeroller/" />
  <row Id="1028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="584" RevisionGUID="56fe8e9a-dd74-49b5-a66b-8d10013aceda" CreationDate="2009-09-03T18:48:43.100" UserDisplayName="Avery Payne" Text="SU's color scheme is easiest to look at (barring the baby-poo pop-up bar at the top).  Soothing blues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SF's color scheme is pretty straightforward, with burgundy and red and black...nice deep colors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SO's color scheme wants me to peel my eyes out of their sockets and fry them with special sauce.  Orange/Green?  Ew!  I'm staring at citrus all day!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why not pick the tri-color scheme with each site, and stick with it, but for highlighting, accepted answers, etc. stick to the same highlight/bold/border scheme for all sites?  IMHO, It's not the colors that matter, *but how items are highlighted*.  Seeing questions with accepted answers is confusing at times - the highlight may or may not stand out depending on what site you're on, may or may not be a border, a background, etc.  So confusing, I have to sit there and acclimate my thoughts as to what is going on each time I look at questions, answers, accepted answers, etc.  Even the &quot;standout&quot; and &quot;fade away&quot; on each site can be a bit confusing at first - if I don't want to see a question, rather than making it faint, couldn't I just filter it out and make it all go away?  The first few weeks it was &quot;what the hell...what does that say, why is it so hard to read?  Oh, it's because it matched a keyword that I don't want...&quot;" />
  <row Id="1029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="585" RevisionGUID="6288e64d-2631-4cbc-8bbc-65a01c0a963a" CreationDate="2009-09-03T18:55:03.633" UserDisplayName="Michael Kniskern" Text="It should use the [&quot;Hot Dog Stand&quot;][1]  Windows 3.11 color scheme&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000341.html" />
  <row Id="1030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="580" RevisionGUID="a2de138c-8105-40af-966f-1f69fe1c5166" CreationDate="2009-09-03T18:24:10.993" UserDisplayName="frou" Text="![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll give you that it looks fairly unique, but looking like one of those awful Windows 3.1 / 95 themes you might discover a relative using does not evoke &quot;Power User&quot; in me!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/1316/picture4hdg.png" />
  <row Id="1031" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="580" RevisionGUID="a2de138c-8105-40af-966f-1f69fe1c5166" CreationDate="2009-09-03T18:24:10.993" UserDisplayName="frou" Text="Why does SuperUser have such a horrific colour scheme?" />
  <row Id="1032" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="580" RevisionGUID="a2de138c-8105-40af-966f-1f69fe1c5166" CreationDate="2009-09-03T18:24:10.993" UserDisplayName="frou" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="1033" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="580" RevisionGUID="0eded8ca-2185-4d5d-aa19-c3560d88d2fd" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:53.593" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/19952/why-does-superuser-have-such-a-horrific-colour-scheme" Text="" />
  <row Id="1034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="587" RevisionGUID="0fd2c9cd-4b89-47ea-a396-38ec30618079" CreationDate="2009-09-04T01:58:14.913" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="I don't think &quot;adobe-&quot; is necessary in the tag. There's really no other &quot;photoshop.&quot; You can request a tag-merge though if you see the divide getting larger and larger between the two." />
  <row Id="1035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="588" RevisionGUID="aa05af5f-b81d-4be5-9a69-fc337ff86709" CreationDate="2009-09-04T02:28:44.247" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Retagging **`[photoshop]`** to **`[adobe-photoshop]`** seems over the top for the application. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you talk with art students bleeding from the nose about the program they're using, they usually just curse the high cost of **`[photoshop]`** and not with the adobe prefix.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless another company comes along infringing on the name, it should be okay to go with just **`[photoshop]`**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not sure about its use as a verb though." />
  <row Id="1036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="589" RevisionGUID="eb7bd488-ce70-4a2e-8434-91f186ed5cba" CreationDate="2009-09-04T13:01:09.247" UserDisplayName="Rob Allen" Text="This isn't likely to be a popular opinion but what the hell. Too much rep on Meta can be a bad thing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I say, keep both [photoshop] _and_ [adobe-photoshop]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Photoshop] has become a verb much in the way that Google or RollerBlade has. Its somewhat detached from the program itself at this point. You can 'Shop something in Gimp for example. For questions about image manipulation, vector drawing, etc. the [photoshop] tag may be appropriate, even if the question asker is using Paint Shop Pro, Corel Draw or the Gimp.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [Adobe-Photoshop] tag could be used for complications with learning that program and most likely should be treated in the same way we treat versions of Windows or Visual Studio (i.e. [adobe-photoshop-cs4], [adobe-photoshop-mx] , [adobe-photoshop-cs2], etc.). " />
  <row Id="1037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="586" RevisionGUID="a748bafa-2a6c-429e-a9ff-310f363ad284" CreationDate="2009-09-04T01:55:57.087" UserDisplayName="Jared Harley" Text="I am looking for a little guidance from the community. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Earlier today, I answered a question on SuperUser. After looking at the other Adobe-related tags already existing on SuperUser, I retagged the asker's original tag of &lt;kbd&gt;photoshop&lt;/kbd&gt; with &lt;kbd&gt;adobe-photoshop&lt;/kbd&gt;. (The other tags were &lt;kbd&gt;adobe-reader&lt;/kbd&gt;, &lt;kbd&gt;adobe-illustrator&lt;/kbd&gt;, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just visited the question and saw that another user retagged the question back to &lt;kbd&gt;photoshop&lt;/kbd&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are currently 27 questions tagged just &lt;kbd&gt;photoshop&lt;/kbd&gt; - should these be retagged to &lt;kbd&gt;adobe-photoshop&lt;/kbd&gt; to fall in line with the other Adobe products? Or should the &lt;kbd&gt;photoshop&lt;/kbd&gt; tag remain alone?" />
  <row Id="1038" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="586" RevisionGUID="a748bafa-2a6c-429e-a9ff-310f363ad284" CreationDate="2009-09-04T01:55:57.087" UserDisplayName="Jared Harley" Text="SuperUser tag for Adobe Photoshop" />
  <row Id="1039" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="586" RevisionGUID="a748bafa-2a6c-429e-a9ff-310f363ad284" CreationDate="2009-09-04T01:55:57.087" UserDisplayName="Jared Harley" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="1040" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="586" RevisionGUID="6376e955-1027-405c-8841-a67962617d03" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:54.140" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/20124/superuser-tag-for-adobe-photoshop" Text="" />
  <row Id="1041" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="591" RevisionGUID="f88590f8-a390-4bd1-a112-3419c7cf9b70" CreationDate="2009-09-05T21:12:51.317" UserDisplayName="balpha" Text="I would assume that this is a problem with the amount of rep required to *create* badges, and less so about retagging. Do you have access to statistics which of those tags where created *during question posting* and which ones *during retagging*?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on my assumption, I'd rather suggest raising the &quot;create tag&quot; rep border to 500&amp;mdash;I think that consistent, as you trust people to &quot;mess with the tags&quot; either way, whether through retagging or through tag creation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, according to Pesto &lt;a href=&quot;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/13485/auto-remove-tags-left-without-an-associated-question/13487#13487&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, unused tags do in fact get removed&amp;mdash;so what is true now?" />
  <row Id="1042" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="590" RevisionGUID="9945be23-6b4a-487a-a2f3-62f77ba63f33" CreationDate="2009-09-05T20:55:06.747" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I spent some time this evening going through the tags on SuperUser, and considering the wider audience it attracts, which are much more inexperienced the ability to edit tags gets abused quickly. This could also be due to the lack of understanding of what tags are altogether.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keeping the tags on SuperUser consistent is also made harder by the wider topic range. Therefore we quickly end up with duplicate tags being added to a question, or even have users putting spaces in tags not realizing it creates separate tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looking at the tags list the last 10 pages are tags which has been removed but are still available for selection. It is going to take some time to clean this up, and with users adding new one's the minute they get tag editing rights, it seems to be a endless exercise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest the limit gets increased to at least 2000 if not higher. " />
  <row Id="1043" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="590" RevisionGUID="9945be23-6b4a-487a-a2f3-62f77ba63f33" CreationDate="2009-09-05T20:55:06.747" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Increase reputation requirement for tag editing on SuperUser" />
  <row Id="1044" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="590" RevisionGUID="9945be23-6b4a-487a-a2f3-62f77ba63f33" CreationDate="2009-09-05T20:55:06.747" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;tagging&gt;" />
  <row Id="1045" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="590" RevisionGUID="c45e64d8-5be1-47e6-896c-cd43a588ebcf" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:54.633" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/20596/increase-reputation-requirement-for-tag-editing-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="593" RevisionGUID="21638b3f-6309-4bd1-8a69-2956fbc9090e" CreationDate="2009-09-09T15:03:04.267" UserDisplayName="Jon B" Text="I agree. Although I wouldn't get too sophisticated with this. Maybe just a little note on the page near the tags list." />
  <row Id="1047" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="594" RevisionGUID="92b65cb4-fa17-4771-8100-1a118792ed18" CreationDate="2009-09-09T15:03:26.903" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="I think it would be nice if the posting guidelines for questions gave some more definitive tag suggestions. Like what you said, if you have a problem, don't forget to include your OS (if you think it is important). " />
  <row Id="1048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="595" RevisionGUID="b8f35ee0-1274-494f-b5b7-c6894b2a072c" CreationDate="2009-09-09T15:13:16.197" UserDisplayName="innaM" Text="Sometimes you can infer stuff from *missing* tags. When the OS is not included, it is safe to assume that we are talking about Windows." />
  <row Id="1049" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="597" RevisionGUID="02e2d652-e5b3-4e54-9071-c3830fa1cd48" CreationDate="2009-10-01T04:50:27.390" Text="I made the default tag suggestion help text &quot;osx linux windows&quot;" />
  <row Id="1050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="596" RevisionGUID="1fa74d80-2bbe-4883-a513-aab2b54533f3" CreationDate="2009-09-09T16:32:25.147" UserDisplayName="Decio Lira" Text="the site is about trusting users as well, if we start &quot;suggesting&quot; to include the operating system tag, later people will want to include a hardware specific tag, and later start **demanding** stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMHO, if you believe a operating system is relevant to the questions, would be enough to add a comment **politely** asking the user to add one, or someone with enough rep. This kind of participation is what make users learn and improve their questions." />
  <row Id="1051" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="592" RevisionGUID="ab495357-2ffa-41f1-8992-0a17974006ad" CreationDate="2009-09-09T14:59:45.410" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="When asking a question on Super User, add a suggestion for users to include their &quot;operating system&quot; when adding tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's such a *common omission* in questions on Super User, I think an extra reminder would be justified." />
  <row Id="1052" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="592" RevisionGUID="ab495357-2ffa-41f1-8992-0a17974006ad" CreationDate="2009-09-09T14:59:45.410" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="Super User - Suggest adding an operating system tag" />
  <row Id="1053" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="592" RevisionGUID="ab495357-2ffa-41f1-8992-0a17974006ad" CreationDate="2009-09-09T14:59:45.410" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="1054" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="592" RevisionGUID="8289c3be-78bd-4bba-8f0a-e6a710f9d15e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:54.900" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/21016/super-user-suggest-adding-an-operating-system-tag" Text="" />
  <row Id="1055" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="599" RevisionGUID="a77c4a77-a283-4e3a-a9c3-fa81956480d6" CreationDate="2009-09-11T18:52:21.037" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="How about &quot;Diago.&quot; It's been working just fine so far. Or, if you like, &quot;Diago Diamond.&quot; No need to explain that one." />
  <row Id="1056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="601" RevisionGUID="4b75eb42-8187-4106-86de-fd1a542448cf" CreationDate="2009-09-11T19:04:17.207" UserDisplayName="Joel Coehoorn" Text="How 'bout just Diablo" />
  <row Id="1057" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="604" RevisionGUID="8b04f55a-8b33-432d-8a5b-9220db846432" CreationDate="2009-09-11T19:36:00.780" UserDisplayName="devinb" Text="Maybe we should soften then edge, try and make him seem a more 'sympathetic' and 'caring' moderator, and call him&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Diago the Lovable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way, people will be less likely to downvote him. They'd seem heartless." />
  <row Id="1058" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="605" RevisionGUID="f7c054cd-42b7-4e14-9560-5d9c1eb84c6f" CreationDate="2009-09-11T20:03:50.623" UserDisplayName="Rich Seller" Text="From his profile:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When not in front of a computer he spends his time with his family and their collection of animals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So perhaps:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Diago Doolittle" />
  <row Id="1059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="606" RevisionGUID="b288d24c-e55a-4e0b-8faa-de67e616134e" CreationDate="2009-09-11T20:07:31.117" UserDisplayName="Bill the Lizard" Text="Diago the Fist of Righteous Fury" />
  <row Id="1060" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="600" RevisionGUID="35f60340-d935-4a38-a558-3f0335b25482" CreationDate="2009-09-11T18:53:30.550" UserDisplayName="EBGreen" Text="Diago the Diviner due to his ability to determine the applicability of questions." />
  <row Id="1061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="602" RevisionGUID="fae288c5-fb97-44b0-94be-efca2ae4cdc7" CreationDate="2009-09-11T19:07:11.477" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="William the Conqueror" />
  <row Id="1062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="603" RevisionGUID="a572808e-8a6d-4658-b15f-1792881ecb47" CreationDate="2009-09-11T19:21:54.350" UserDisplayName="beska" Text="Manfrenjensen   " />
  <row Id="1063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="598" RevisionGUID="3ebd974a-1457-4951-b313-6d9acad5865c" CreationDate="2009-09-11T18:50:21.633" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="So Diago has been doing a great job as the newest mod to SU.  He ruthlessly puts up with endless amounts of non SU questions and promptly closes them.  He sometimes gets unfairly revenge downvotes due to his all powerful mod powers. I gave him the nickname Diago the Douche due to the reaction of some SU users to his calls. I have agreed with 99% of Diago's mod calls so I want to honor him with a name. I thought Diago the Destroyer was a great name also.  What should Diago add to his name? What would make Diago even more awesome?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/users/3981/diago" />
  <row Id="1064" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="598" RevisionGUID="3ebd974a-1457-4951-b313-6d9acad5865c" CreationDate="2009-09-11T18:50:21.633" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="Diago needs a name addition?" />
  <row Id="1065" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="598" RevisionGUID="3ebd974a-1457-4951-b313-6d9acad5865c" CreationDate="2009-09-11T18:50:21.633" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="1066" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="598" RevisionGUID="aed43e30-c71c-474a-8529-7f71faba8b93" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:55.510" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/21422/diago-needs-a-name-addition" Text="" />
  <row Id="1067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="608" RevisionGUID="1177d494-ff57-485c-806e-8fa85a16ca99" CreationDate="2009-09-12T19:06:57.500" UserDisplayName="Ladybug Killer" Text="If you do not find an answer in the [FAQ][1] (especially the [troubleshooting tips][2]) email the team!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/openid+faq&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/1774/i-cant-log-in-with-my-openid-troubleshooting-tips" />
  <row Id="1068" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="607" RevisionGUID="7b934236-fd38-4ed7-a73f-6055a5480ee9" CreationDate="2009-09-12T08:22:32.243" UserDisplayName="Proxify" Text="I have tried using my openID and some of the other options and it always says it's an invalid ID...any idea what may be happening?" />
  <row Id="1069" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="607" RevisionGUID="7b934236-fd38-4ed7-a73f-6055a5480ee9" CreationDate="2009-09-12T08:22:32.243" UserDisplayName="Proxify" Text="Can't login to Super User" />
  <row Id="1070" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="607" RevisionGUID="7b934236-fd38-4ed7-a73f-6055a5480ee9" CreationDate="2009-09-12T08:22:32.243" UserDisplayName="Proxify" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="1071" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="607" RevisionGUID="b6eebe2e-1d10-4fec-a651-0abaff7e6890" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:56.740" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/21480/cant-login-to-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="610" RevisionGUID="95081ff7-1e0c-43a3-ac65-3daef5e5e53a" CreationDate="2009-09-21T20:04:24.697" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="I feel that the quality of the answer on Super User is related to the quality of the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plus I often find questions where I know there isn't a (yet) existing solution to or they simply ask for the impossible. Now if I were Jon Skeet, I might be able to hack a solution together, but I'm clearly not, so I have to do with my experiences and Google. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would love more people from Server Fault coming over to help with some of the troubleshooting problems, since they often have good best practices on finding solutions and have more experience with it as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The people from Stack Overflow tend to know a lot of useful applications and typically now more about things that could cause software problems. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So yes, they would all be very useful to Super User, but we can't force them to come over! However I do have the feeling that some people find the questions on Super User too newbisch and therefore tend to avoid the site alltogether. They probably have enough people in their direct surroundings bugging them with those kind of questions already..." />
  <row Id="1073" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="611" RevisionGUID="93ad5972-af0b-4865-8ead-9d6fbf25823b" CreationDate="2009-09-23T07:20:44.353" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Sadly I had an answer on this question I deleted 2 days ago which disagreed with the OP. However after some review in the last 2 days I have to admit I actually agree with the OP on this, sad as it may sound coming from a moderator.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the last few days I have found myself more and more deleting my own answers, solely because of the lack of understanding, misunderstanding of the value of the answer to the question or even downright laziness by the SU community to do proper research, or even provide good quality answer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't get me wrong, I can deal with people disagreeing with me, however I can't deal with people who don't bother to accept that there is alternatives to particular problems or no matter how many ways you ask a question the answer still remains the same. Just because you don't know the answer or haven't seen something work, doesn't mean it does not exists or hasn't been done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some examples of the current problems with the questions and answers on SU that I see every day:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Questions are duplicated, yet never flagged because it's more beneficial to gain reputation then close a question as duplicate. &#xD;&#xA; - Posting questions that are subjective and still not bothering to mark it CW, or getting upset because the question is closed.&#xD;&#xA; - Instead of upvoting an answer, posting exactly the same answer as 10 others. Sadly none of the other answers get upvoted.&#xD;&#xA; - Killing a question with lengthy and unnecessary meta discussions&#xD;&#xA; - Single link answers or LMGTFY answers. No description or attempt at solving the problem.&#xD;&#xA; - Not being able to define the logical line between gaming questions.&#xD;&#xA; - Users spending more time implementing their idea of what the tags should be to gain a badge, rather then fixing the question itself or providing a proper answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since SU already has a fairly good percentage of high level users, I would expect these users to actually guide the rest improve the value of the site. I never understood why [JohnT](http://superuser.com/users/1931/john-t) never upvotes anyone yet he is the highest user on the site, however the quality of his answers is brilliant. The same goes for [Nik](http://superuser.com/users/263/nik) Therefore the potential for high quality is there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment it seems the biggest problem with SU is that the current user base treats the site like a dumping ground. Although these sites are part of a trilogy, they each stand on their own, and should be considered individually. Sadly this is not happening, and therefore the users that can add value doesn't want to contribute to the site, because it is overflowing and when they do contribute they don't get the level of response they do on the other sites, as mentioned by the OP.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I have been an over zealous moderator. I know I have made some bad judgement calls. However I have tried to be active and visible. As has the rest of the SU moderator team. We try improve the quality of questions and answers. Unfortunately this battle is becoming harder and harder everyday. I have started to step back leaving the community to handle the questions that I used to get involved in, unfortunately it seems that this is not working as well as it did for SF and SO. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of the day the goal of the site should not be the issue. Quality questions and answers is a goal of all the sites, whether is development, server or desktop related. A standard was set a year ago on SO. SF outright inherited it. I can't believe it is that hard to meet this standard on SU as well. However I am not entirely sure if we currently have the user base that can make this happen. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Considering the target audience of SU, having detailed and high quality step-by-step answers your mother can follow should be the standard for providing answers.**" />
  <row Id="1074" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="609" RevisionGUID="b6f1a242-8d74-4018-9d1e-e74349e4612b" CreationDate="2009-09-21T19:05:13.370" UserDisplayName="Ben S" Text="I find the quality and quantity of answers on SO/SF to be substantially better than on SU. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Troubleshooting questions on SU often get boxed answers from the first few Google hits. Same goes with How-do-I type of questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On SO/SF, it's almost assumed the author of a question has done some research before-hand, and giving them a boxed answer won't be useful. Because of this, answers on SO/SF often have elaborate, custom solutions, with answers often having many revisions to add/correct/clarify information. Sure some answers are obviously boxed there too, but most questions get at least a few original, custom answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, the level of viewership is also drastically different. I often wish I could get the viewership of SO or SF for a question I must post on SU since it isn't directly programming or server related. They could easily answer many questions that are posted on SU if only they saw the question and had an incentive to answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- **Do you find the quality/quantity of answers on SU to be inferior to SO/SF?**&#xD;&#xA;- **Would it be a good idea to encourage SO/SF users to answer SU questions?**&#xD;&#xA;- **How could we encourage SO/SF users to answer on SU?**" />
  <row Id="1075" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="609" RevisionGUID="b6f1a242-8d74-4018-9d1e-e74349e4612b" CreationDate="2009-09-21T19:05:13.370" UserDisplayName="Ben S" Text="Should we encourage SO and SF users to answer on SU?" />
  <row Id="1076" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="609" RevisionGUID="b6f1a242-8d74-4018-9d1e-e74349e4612b" CreationDate="2009-09-21T19:05:13.370" UserDisplayName="Ben S" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;answers&gt;" />
  <row Id="1077" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="609" RevisionGUID="18abb6bd-2a73-4c02-9f25-38155604bdc1" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:56.977" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/22893/should-we-encourage-so-and-sf-users-to-answer-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1078" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="613" RevisionGUID="aa34a9e1-a37e-443a-9807-758c37ea201c" CreationDate="2009-09-24T01:06:58.813" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Unless your peripheral device hooks up to the computer, then it will most likely be closed as not a computer question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So even if the iPhone or PDA has computing parts and guts, it's not considered appropriate/related for SU unless you have it interacting with the computer." />
  <row Id="1079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="614" RevisionGUID="dd50904c-6bf0-45a2-99b5-92b759c8ad62" CreationDate="2009-09-24T03:09:12.120" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="SuperUser is for generally all consumer computing questions. This can involve computer hardware such as everything in the actual computer casing, to monitors, printers, routers, etc. etc. etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Smartphones such as the iPhone and blackberry are also legitimate questions. iPod Touch is generally accepted since it is using the same OS as the iPhone. Other iPod and mp3 player questions generally must have some form of computer interaction involved for it to be legitimate." />
  <row Id="1080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="612" RevisionGUID="98cdbb76-4a6b-4e04-8c8f-d037c9e4a9dc" CreationDate="2009-09-24T01:03:58.633" UserDisplayName="Nathaniel" Text="What about other computing questions, about things such as PDAs?&#xD;&#xA;I guess this is kind of related to [Are iPhone, iPod, iPod touch questions computer related (SuperUser)?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/16087/are-iphone-ipod-ipod-touch-questions-computer-related-superuser" />
  <row Id="1081" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="612" RevisionGUID="98cdbb76-4a6b-4e04-8c8f-d037c9e4a9dc" CreationDate="2009-09-24T01:03:58.633" UserDisplayName="Nathaniel" Text="Is Super User only for *personal* computers?" />
  <row Id="1082" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="612" RevisionGUID="98cdbb76-4a6b-4e04-8c8f-d037c9e4a9dc" CreationDate="2009-09-24T01:03:58.633" UserDisplayName="Nathaniel" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="1083" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="612" RevisionGUID="95d1de82-6199-4312-ad6a-7e3e4f87d8ee" CreationDate="2010-07-22T17:59:57.970" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/23239/is-super-user-only-for-personal-computers" Text="" />
  <row Id="1084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="616" RevisionGUID="dee5264d-a6a3-4563-920a-826569bf5048" CreationDate="2009-09-25T14:48:16.723" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="For very small retag requests like this (8 or 9 as you say), then it is easy enough for users who have enough rep to retag to go and do it themselves without having to raise a request for it. That is one of the beauties of community moderation and the ability to edit things yourself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit** I went ahead and did the rename anyway." />
  <row Id="1085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="615" RevisionGUID="a344dacc-c8f9-4e97-b04a-74b8924cb1d7" CreationDate="2009-09-25T14:43:01.427" UserDisplayName="hyperslug" Text="Retag videostreaming to video-streaming.  Same as http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/18601/retag-streaming-to-streaming, but for Superuser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Only 8 questions so far http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/videostreaming, possibly a ninth http://superuser.com/questions/46801/is-there-a-free-video-camera-software-to-switch-between-multiple-cameras." />
  <row Id="1086" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="615" RevisionGUID="a344dacc-c8f9-4e97-b04a-74b8924cb1d7" CreationDate="2009-09-25T14:43:01.427" UserDisplayName="hyperslug" Text="retag-request: [videostreaming] -&gt; [video-streaming]" />
  <row Id="1087" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="615" RevisionGUID="a344dacc-c8f9-4e97-b04a-74b8924cb1d7" CreationDate="2009-09-25T14:43:01.427" UserDisplayName="hyperslug" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1088" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="615" RevisionGUID="73e12757-cf22-496c-b77c-f9f1306ddc13" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:27.827" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/23473/retag-request-videostreaming-video-streaming" Text="" />
  <row Id="1089" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="618" RevisionGUID="15f4d283-b184-4861-a62b-12de52b6554c" CreationDate="2009-09-27T09:15:33.393" UserDisplayName="Jon Skeet" Text="I suspect it's just a sort ordered by (number of posts, name) that's descending, instead of ordering by number of posts descending and name ascending.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that this goes against the expected ordering, I think I'd call this a very minor bug. Mind you, the tags page itself doesn't seem to have any (obvious) secondary ordering..." />
  <row Id="1090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="617" RevisionGUID="de1e7602-61df-43a3-bf17-d2bc1490daee" CreationDate="2009-09-27T08:21:28.890" UserDisplayName="Lazer" Text="I just noticed. They are opposite of what I though they would be!!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have a look:&#xD;&#xA;[http://superuser.com/users/8829/eskay][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/8829/eskay" />
  <row Id="1091" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="617" RevisionGUID="de1e7602-61df-43a3-bf17-d2bc1490daee" CreationDate="2009-09-27T08:21:28.890" UserDisplayName="Lazer" Text="Why are the tags on my page arranged reverse alphabetically?" />
  <row Id="1092" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="617" RevisionGUID="de1e7602-61df-43a3-bf17-d2bc1490daee" CreationDate="2009-09-27T08:21:28.890" UserDisplayName="Lazer" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="1093" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="617" RevisionGUID="62147df9-1577-4a23-990e-f0876e4636d0" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:28.080" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/23633/why-are-the-tags-on-my-page-arranged-reverse-alphabetically" Text="" />
  <row Id="1094" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="620" RevisionGUID="27621f04-bcf8-4b58-9df9-5b39568650ad" CreationDate="2009-09-28T03:44:47.103" UserDisplayName="EvilChookie" Text="I think that SuperUser's criteria should be expanded to include meta computing topics, such as these. I certainly think your question is valid - and definately a question that I would expect to see on a site called &quot;Super User&quot;. " />
  <row Id="1095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="621" RevisionGUID="dd83ecd4-1ccc-4f02-9633-c0a36473ed61" CreationDate="2009-09-29T05:58:17.930" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I am happy to see this on SU, however because of the subjective nature of meta questions and the fact that there won't be one concrete answer due to the discussion format of the question, they should be CW from the beginning. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just a reminder, on the FAQ it also states:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Avoid asking questions that are subjective, argumentative, or require extended discussion. This is not a discussion board, this is a place for questions that can be answered!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Meta question are generally very much in the above category and chances are they will be closely watched by the moderators." />
  <row Id="1096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="619" RevisionGUID="6f7ba904-63bd-44ef-9627-5fce82ab3c18" CreationDate="2009-09-28T03:30:13.947" UserDisplayName="beggs" Text="I posted the question [Best Practices for managing virtual personae][1] to SU some time ago and it received very little attention.  Maybe this is because it is not the appropriate place to ask the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The SU FAQ says:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  If you have a question about ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; … and it is not about videogames or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; consoles, then you're in the right&#xD;&#xA;&gt; place to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question was not hardware related and not particularly software related, so maybe SU was not the right place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand I think that the issues I was trying to discuss would be of interest to people who appreciate the term &quot;SuperUser&quot; and the question does not seem to fit the profiles of StackOverflow ServerFault or Meta either.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given [all][2] [the][3] [discussion][4] on what belongs on SU, does my question not have a place on the trilogy sites? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I update the question title to reflect a more general question: ___Where do meta-computing questions belong?___&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/29177/best-practices-for-managing-virtual-personae&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15456/can-we-please-have-more-strictness-on-su&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5766/super-user-attracting-too-many-open-ended-subjective-questions&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6542/are-video-game-questions-appropriate-for-superuser" />
  <row Id="1097" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="619" RevisionGUID="6f7ba904-63bd-44ef-9627-5fce82ab3c18" CreationDate="2009-09-28T03:30:13.947" UserDisplayName="beggs" Text="On which trilogy site does a &quot;meta-computing&quot; question belong?" />
  <row Id="1098" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="619" RevisionGUID="6f7ba904-63bd-44ef-9627-5fce82ab3c18" CreationDate="2009-09-28T03:30:13.947" UserDisplayName="beggs" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="1099" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="619" RevisionGUID="e4b0182d-478f-457c-b7d8-2c5200fc0e99" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:28.350" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/23667/on-which-trilogy-site-does-a-meta-computing-question-belong" Text="" />
  <row Id="1100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="623" RevisionGUID="9d09abaa-8837-47a4-9c42-87c033158711" CreationDate="2009-09-29T20:53:02.047" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="There is no way currently to save the 'Recent' setting on the profile page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a [link][1] to question you can vote on to get it moved up the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/3896/how-to-make-recent-activity-by-default" />
  <row Id="1101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="624" RevisionGUID="5eec7887-77ec-41f9-a85f-977343aa035b" CreationDate="2009-09-29T20:34:06.987" UserDisplayName="Chris K" Text="on your profile page, there are 4 little boxes to the right and above your questions. Click on the one titled &quot;Recent&quot; (or maybe that should be &quot;newest&quot;? Experiment a little ;) )" />
  <row Id="1102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="625" RevisionGUID="8c08cf98-ef19-44ec-bb70-bc28a8db7201" CreationDate="2009-09-29T21:08:27.307" UserDisplayName="harrymc" Text="If you're using Firefox, then what you need is [Platypus][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Platypus is a Firefox extension which&#xD;&#xA;&gt; lets you modify a Web page from your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; browser -- &quot;What You See Is What You&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Get&quot; -- and then save those changes as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a Greasemonkey script so that they'll&#xD;&#xA;&gt; be repeated the next time you visit&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the page. Editing pages to suit your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; needs is dandy -- but making those&#xD;&#xA;&gt; changes &quot;permanent&quot; is the real&#xD;&#xA;&gt; payoff.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Some of the things you can do with&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Platypus include:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Remove parts of the page you don't wish to see.&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Move a part of the page to a different location.&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Change the style and format of page elements.&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Modify all the links on the page using a regular expression.&lt;br/&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Insert your own HTML code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://platypus.mozdev.org/" />
  <row Id="1103" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="622" RevisionGUID="f0164688-5cd3-4bc2-b5d8-c93835d023be" CreationDate="2009-09-29T20:30:14.263" UserDisplayName="Xavierjazz" Text="Is there a way to change the way items are displayed in my profile on SuperUser?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to display my questions and answers in the order of newest to oldest, but I can find no way to set this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1104" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="622" RevisionGUID="f0164688-5cd3-4bc2-b5d8-c93835d023be" CreationDate="2009-09-29T20:30:14.263" UserDisplayName="Xavierjazz" Text="Is there a way to change the way items are displayed in my profile on SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="1105" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="622" RevisionGUID="f0164688-5cd3-4bc2-b5d8-c93835d023be" CreationDate="2009-09-29T20:30:14.263" UserDisplayName="Xavierjazz" Text="&lt;preferences&gt;" />
  <row Id="1106" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="622" RevisionGUID="ecac7dfe-82ce-45c8-8073-9adfb49632d1" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:28.533" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/23924/is-there-a-way-to-change-the-way-items-are-displayed-in-my-profile-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="627" RevisionGUID="715bd456-dc07-4b9a-86d0-0a652585c74e" CreationDate="2009-10-05T06:45:01.850" Text="Yep, looks like a bug. I went in and cleaned it up, and I also added the missing &quot;Fanatic&quot; badge." />
  <row Id="1108" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="626" RevisionGUID="fef496ca-1573-46e6-93a6-9da61988384a" CreationDate="2009-10-05T06:38:59.147" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="Yesterday I deleted an answer that had 4 upvotes to [this question][1] (the answer was a bit misleading and the OP told me it was incorrect), yet I've yet to see a badge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There has never been a Disciplined badge awarded on SU, even though it's a bronze badge. Does the badge even work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/50680/is-there-a-way-to-find-out-what-app-is-using-most-of-my-bandwidth-in-windows" />
  <row Id="1109" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="626" RevisionGUID="fef496ca-1573-46e6-93a6-9da61988384a" CreationDate="2009-10-05T06:38:59.147" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="Does the Disciplined badge work on SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="1110" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="626" RevisionGUID="fef496ca-1573-46e6-93a6-9da61988384a" CreationDate="2009-10-05T06:38:59.147" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;badges&gt;&lt;disciplined&gt;" />
  <row Id="1111" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="626" RevisionGUID="8a60e5da-c019-46ea-add5-bfcfb08d285e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:28.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/24589/does-the-disciplined-badge-work-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1112" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="629" RevisionGUID="8530c3a3-3261-4812-a674-e9c5d9c9d637" CreationDate="2009-10-07T07:08:13.527" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="Went through and took care of these." />
  <row Id="1113" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="628" RevisionGUID="1e58396e-fd36-4fa1-80a7-9c56398d9be6" CreationDate="2009-10-07T06:55:04.063" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="There are currently quite a lot of tags that have alternatives on SU. Would it be possible to trim them down a bit? I'd do it manually, but there's way too many of them:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - vista (37) -&gt; windows-vista (604)&#xD;&#xA; - xp (22) and winxp (5) -&gt; windows-xp (685)&#xD;&#xA; - windows7 (8) -&gt; windows-7 (906)&#xD;&#xA; - office (10), ms-office (4) and msoffice (2) -&gt; microsoft-office (60)&#xD;&#xA; - ie (6) -&gt; internet-explorer (69)&#xD;&#xA; - ie6 (5) -&gt; internet-explorer-6 (2)&#xD;&#xA; - ie7 (2) -&gt; internet-explorer-7 (5)&#xD;&#xA; - ie8 (18) -&gt; internet-explorer-8 (25)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1114" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="628" RevisionGUID="1e58396e-fd36-4fa1-80a7-9c56398d9be6" CreationDate="2009-10-07T06:55:04.063" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="Please retag multiple SU tags" />
  <row Id="1115" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="628" RevisionGUID="1e58396e-fd36-4fa1-80a7-9c56398d9be6" CreationDate="2009-10-07T06:55:04.063" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1116" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="628" RevisionGUID="d4738eea-80fd-4a7b-8b75-ae7f05538dee" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:29.113" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/24821/please-retag-multiple-su-tags" Text="" />
  <row Id="1117" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="631" RevisionGUID="85503ce1-56d8-45bf-8700-687f08121b62" CreationDate="2009-10-09T06:57:04.387" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="Yes, that would be the proper site to ask questions about that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the SuperUser FAQ:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What kind of questions can I ask here?&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;… and it is not about videogames or consoles, then you're in the right place to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/faq" />
  <row Id="1118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="632" RevisionGUID="c384c919-58bc-43b3-ab49-38a82d337f67" CreationDate="2009-10-09T06:58:08.677" Text="Per the [/faq](http://superuser.com/faq) :&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   - computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   - computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; … and it is *not* about videogames or consoles, then you're in the right place to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;so, yes!" />
  <row Id="1119" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="630" RevisionGUID="104863f7-490b-4846-aaf6-fad6eb763d01" CreationDate="2009-10-09T06:50:17.800" UserDisplayName="D Connors" Text="I'm having problems with virtualbox, and I want to know if SuperUser is the right place to troubleshoot the issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks" />
  <row Id="1120" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="630" RevisionGUID="104863f7-490b-4846-aaf6-fad6eb763d01" CreationDate="2009-10-09T06:50:17.800" UserDisplayName="D Connors" Text="Is the superuser site the place for troubleshooting?" />
  <row Id="1121" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="630" RevisionGUID="104863f7-490b-4846-aaf6-fad6eb763d01" CreationDate="2009-10-09T06:50:17.800" UserDisplayName="D Connors" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;troubleshooting&gt;" />
  <row Id="1122" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="630" RevisionGUID="bb1b5a9e-f399-478c-8ce9-0787de961e68" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:29.800" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/25251/is-the-superuser-site-the-place-for-troubleshooting" Text="" />
  <row Id="1123" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="634" RevisionGUID="28345196-9b78-416c-ac0d-6101283d3e20" CreationDate="2009-10-09T17:43:52.143" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Done. Edited it manually." />
  <row Id="1124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="633" RevisionGUID="4c470e4a-c163-43bf-8ec3-e888f75c996d" CreationDate="2009-10-09T17:37:28.613" UserDisplayName="Jim G." Text="**virtualpc**: 1 question&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**virtual-pc**: 31 questions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no reason to have two tags. They mean the same thing." />
  <row Id="1125" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="633" RevisionGUID="4c470e4a-c163-43bf-8ec3-e888f75c996d" CreationDate="2009-10-09T17:37:28.613" UserDisplayName="Jim G." Text="virtualpc --&gt; virtual-pc" />
  <row Id="1126" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="633" RevisionGUID="4c470e4a-c163-43bf-8ec3-e888f75c996d" CreationDate="2009-10-09T17:37:28.613" UserDisplayName="Jim G." Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1127" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="633" RevisionGUID="24abae1e-d39a-4471-9fa8-3096d0b8b2d3" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:30.117" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/25340/virtualpc-virtual-pc" Text="" />
  <row Id="1128" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="636" RevisionGUID="354bddf5-bb15-4971-a5fd-64d6e57a6a5d" CreationDate="2009-10-12T06:33:35.953" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="Completely agree with you, you get the same on Windows where people will tag questions with Windows and Windows-vista/xp/7 or whatnot&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A distinction between OSX for software and Mac for hardware would be more clear (just one hell of a job ;-) )" />
  <row Id="1129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="637" RevisionGUID="2cbcc283-047e-452b-8e29-8245ee0e7ef5" CreationDate="2009-10-12T08:12:52.020" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="This has actually been discussed before:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Especially in [this answer][1] of [this question][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know I've been doing some retagging (after reading above question) from [mac-os-x] and all its variants to 2 different tags [mac] and [os-x] on Superuser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I agree that it's still not the best. Maybe we should rename &quot;os-x&quot; to &quot;mac-os-x&quot; and only use the [mac] tag for hardware related questions. But indeed like [Ivo mentions][3]: this is a hell of a job!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6398/please-could-we-combine-the-osx-and-macosx-tags/8247#8247&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6398/please-could-we-combine-the-osx-and-macosx-tags&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/25559/mac-and-osx-tag-usage-on-su/25560#25560" />
  <row Id="1130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="638" RevisionGUID="dbba4dbf-1c1e-4d53-97d4-5e8ada3b2b47" CreationDate="2009-10-12T09:51:11.670" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I follow a simple process with regards to retagging and editing. If it appears on the front page, it get's retagged and re-edited. If not, leave it. Community bumps questions often enough, and using this process the amount of questions to be retagged becomes less and also fixing errors becomes easier over time. Since they have already been bumped to the home page it also doesn't affect their ranking in anyway.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Eventually the only questions left with incorrect tags are those which have already been answered, and this tends to be a much shorter list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case a mass retag will not make a lot of sense since the questions need to be checked individually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Rule of Thumb**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you can see it, edit and tag it if required, if not, ignore it until it becomes visible. If it can be mass retagged, list it and the moderators will take care of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**With regards to these tags**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem fundamentally is that unless you already know what the SU tags are, new users will never really select the right tag unless there is a mechanism in place to block them. Most people don't know the difference between Mac and OSX, and we can fool ourselves as much as we want with regards to SU members really being SuperUsers, most of them aren't. The same applies to regular posters who don't really care about the validity of the data, they just want an answer to their question, and the tags are a hindrance since they will never search SU for the answer if it is there already." />
  <row Id="1131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="635" RevisionGUID="f948e5c6-cfc3-4a8f-a921-5c13da3981cd" CreationDate="2009-10-12T06:27:49.720" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="I see there are a lot of questions tagged **mac** (749) and even more tagged **osx** (860) on SuperUser. However, I find the usage of the tags to be quite inconsistent. A lot of people tag their questions **mac** simply because they're using a Mac, yet completely ignore the **osx** tag, or they use both of them, just to be on the safe side. That seems completely useless to me; should I tag all my questions **pc** just because I'm using one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should there be a clear distinction made between the 2 tags? I feel that all hardware related questions should be tagged **mac** and all software related questions tagged **osx**. There should be less overlap between the 2 tags. I've retagged a few questions lately, removing the **mac** tag, but I'm not sure if I should be doing this. Any thoughts on this issue?" />
  <row Id="1132" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="635" RevisionGUID="f948e5c6-cfc3-4a8f-a921-5c13da3981cd" CreationDate="2009-10-12T06:27:49.720" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="Mac and osx tag usage on SU" />
  <row Id="1133" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="635" RevisionGUID="f948e5c6-cfc3-4a8f-a921-5c13da3981cd" CreationDate="2009-10-12T06:27:49.720" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retagging&gt;" />
  <row Id="1134" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="635" RevisionGUID="1896b3f6-8220-4579-b67e-c41ac4eed57a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:30.300" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/25559/mac-and-osx-tag-usage-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1135" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="640" RevisionGUID="fdc02544-6b31-4496-96d4-08874c66469a" CreationDate="2009-10-12T22:54:32.960" UserDisplayName="Ólafur Waage" Text="All sites in the trilogy try to avoid subjective questions. Specially SO and SF. In the two examples you have posted, two of them are old. Same thing happened with SO when it started, a lot of fun questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SU had a LOT of fun questions asked to start with and I believe it was tolerated for a little while.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some sneak by unnoticed and when they've gained momentum, people don't close them." />
  <row Id="1136" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="641" RevisionGUID="490a5908-774e-4b83-ba6f-0fad94992ba6" CreationDate="2009-10-12T23:06:18.257" UserDisplayName="GMan" Text="A question is a request for information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A discussion is a collection of statements, questions, comments, and opinions, usually concerning a certain topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A discussion might be sparked by a question, but your question isn't answerable in the sense of a single, definitive response. It's just a discussion about times you wasted money." />
  <row Id="1137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="642" RevisionGUID="e7fc423c-0fd3-4182-8b3e-a282dc5cc11f" CreationDate="2009-10-12T23:44:53.947" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="If everyone living on earth today, everyone who lived in the past, and everyone yet to be born...  &#xD;&#xA;...Could answer your question and **not be *wrong***...  &#xD;&#xA;...Then it's safe to say you didn't ask the sort of question that these sites were designed to help answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, that doesn't mean the answers couldn't be interesting. And from time to time, you'll see a few of these questions slip through for *just that reason*: they hit a chord with the community, and enough people are interested in the answers, and interested in *writing* answers, to keep them open. But, strictly speaking, they're better suited for one of the many forum sites dedicated to these topics, or personal blogs. " />
  <row Id="1138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="643" RevisionGUID="b92c28a4-23ce-4c52-a63f-2485512043d8" CreationDate="2009-10-13T08:52:23.473" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I closed the question and did provide feedback at the time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Firstly, questions aren't closed on a whim. This question came up in the vote to close list and after reviewing the FAQ met the following criteria:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Requires extended discussion&#xD;&#xA; - No single correct answer&#xD;&#xA; - Possibly subjective and argumentative&#xD;&#xA; - Too far off topic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on this criteria the question was closed. I opted for not a real question since I believed Subjective and Argumentative is too strong a reason. Reality is no matter what reason is chosen, almost every single closed question will get disputed and someone will not be happy with the reason, which is one of the risks taken by any moderator closing a question. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These questions all follow a simple cycle, once the critical mass of 3K users are obtained:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 5 Votes to Close (Question Closed)&#xD;&#xA; - Dispute / Argument / Edit War&#xD;&#xA; - 5 Votes to Re-open (Question Open)&#xD;&#xA; - Refer to Step 1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However on SU at the moment this is not possible due to the lack of 3K users, and the lack of understanding of how the Trilogy works with regards to questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With regards to the 50 or so existing questions you will find, most of them where posted during beta, and since the discussion [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15456/can-we-please-have-more-strictness-on-su) raised the point that there needs to be more strictness on SU. Some of these questions have not been closed yet, simply because the moderators are really the only one's that can and at the time there wasn't any, or 3k+ and above users can, but because of the question being old, few notice them to vote on them. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A big part of the problems on SU is related to level of the users attracted to the site. The concepts introduced by the SO engine is unique and a lot of users remain unaware of their abilities, or how to correctly approach the site. Unfortunately this is not something I foresee changing soon, and this also makes SU one of the hardest sites to maintain, and potentially the one place most of the disputes will occur, as the subject matter is not clear cut and straight down the line." />
  <row Id="1139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="639" RevisionGUID="ddf3f445-6cda-4640-b8e4-f7d318231b01" CreationDate="2009-10-12T22:50:24.447" UserDisplayName="rob" Text="I posted this question earlier today on SuperUser: [What was your biggest waste of money and what should you have bought instead?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it's a legitimate question, because I've spent a lot of money on computer junk, electronics, and software that I now realize would have been better spent on other things.  Spending too much money on technology has prevented me from picking up other hobbies.  Also, trying to get the best bargain has prevented me from getting different technology that might have suited my needs a little better.  I was curious whether others had come to a similar realization, and what kinds of things they felt they had wasted money on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately for me, my question has been closed with the explanation, &quot;Not a real question,&quot; and I was told to go read the FAQ.  Of course, I've already done that, and I don't see the difference between my question and the tons of questions like these (which I also think are valid questions):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/1599/what-is-the-worst-depiction-of-computer-use-in-a-movie&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/32799/what-is-your-oldest-hardware-that-still-works&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/5321/whats-the-weirdest-thing-youve-ever-seen-a-non-techie-do-to-a-computing-device&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've been told that someone who voted to close the question didn't see any value to future visitors of the site.  I would like to think that the future value is that others can learn from our mistakes and think twice before buying something they don't need, when they could save up for something else instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/54408/what-was-your-biggest-waste-of-money-and-what-should-you-have-bought-instead" />
  <row Id="1140" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="639" RevisionGUID="ddf3f445-6cda-4640-b8e4-f7d318231b01" CreationDate="2009-10-12T22:50:24.447" UserDisplayName="rob" Text="Please help me distinguish between &quot;Question&quot; and &quot;Discussion&quot;" />
  <row Id="1141" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="639" RevisionGUID="ddf3f445-6cda-4640-b8e4-f7d318231b01" CreationDate="2009-10-12T22:50:24.447" UserDisplayName="rob" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="1142" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="639" RevisionGUID="3d622a9c-7209-46a7-b682-0029fec31ae6" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:31.380" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/25639/please-help-me-distinguish-between-question-and-discussion" Text="" />
  <row Id="1143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="645" RevisionGUID="51953974-f14c-4107-a8bd-ffe9fc96642c" CreationDate="2009-10-13T20:01:30.473" UserDisplayName="ianfuture" Text="I think if you read the FAQ you'll find the explanation" />
  <row Id="1144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="646" RevisionGUID="761034c8-ef4d-4758-8342-5a271fccc544" CreationDate="2009-10-13T20:04:31.107" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Most likely first and foremost because it is **NOT** a discussion forum. It is a Q&amp;A website. From the FAQ directly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Avoid asking questions that are subjective, argumentative, or require extended discussion. This is not a discussion board, this is a place for questions that can be answered!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Trilogy has a specific way of dealing with information, since it is first and foremost an attempt at being a canonical resource of information that constantly gets updated, for specific questions that do have real and exact answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The achieve this goal a few methods had been put in place to ensure that the above remain the main focus of the site. These are not barriers, they are a unique and different way of thinking and moving away from the old discussion forum concept of dealing with questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Part of this process is to gain trust from other members of the community in the form of reputation, and based on this more flexibility with regards to this, as members learn how the site and it's processes work. It is a simple and effective method, which once adopted makes any other forum or medium extremely hard to use." />
  <row Id="1145" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="647" RevisionGUID="4ca3488e-02a8-48d4-9478-3edd657a47c8" CreationDate="2009-10-13T20:04:42.043" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="Jeff and Joel wanted to create an information resource.  They needed to put constraints and rules to keep things focused and on topic.  They wanted sites with specific topics and structure.  They did not want another yahoo answers." />
  <row Id="1146" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="648" RevisionGUID="23a0fa3e-bfd6-475a-a9e1-dff1f9fdf538" CreationDate="2009-10-13T20:05:28.623" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="What barriers? You can ask a question, and get an answer. You can indicate your approval by *accepting* a good answer. What else do you, as a new user, *need* to do?!" />
  <row Id="1147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="649" RevisionGUID="8477b852-378e-4a9c-acdb-972ebefc3c53" CreationDate="2009-10-13T20:11:36.913" UserDisplayName="satanicpuppy" Text="I'm glad to see right answers rewarded, and wrong answers punished. If you can't come up with enough right answers to get enough reputation to do anything, I don't see how that's anyone's problem but your own.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="650" RevisionGUID="c375c0b4-16ab-443f-b551-39b42812ba18" CreationDate="2009-10-13T20:23:31.103" Text="Many of the barriers exist because we allow 100% anonymous participation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If we didn't have some hoops for new users to jump through, we would quickly be overrun by spam and other sorts of nefarious entities." />
  <row Id="1149" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="651" RevisionGUID="1bb17fae-4e6c-4c78-afca-6a73e472063e" CreationDate="2009-10-13T21:27:00.427" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="The most powerful feature of the site is the ability ask and answer questions. And you can do that from day one, anonymously and without reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But to provide that level of no-barrier, no-friction access, the community is asked to self-moderate the site to keep it focused and on-track. Site moderation starts with simply voting on posts, then progressing to commenting, then retagging, then editing, right up through question and user moderation. As your experience with the site grows, so does your abilities and responsibilities to moderate the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Reputation&quot; is simply an indication of your *experience* with the site. More reputation, more abilities.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Wait until you have a bit more experience with the site -- That is the rationale tying reputation to the increasingly important editorial abilities you gain access to.**" />
  <row Id="1150" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="652" RevisionGUID="9a006e13-5d97-4e71-8860-5394ae1e57ab" CreationDate="2009-10-14T01:33:20.730" UserDisplayName="Patriot" Text="Because the people who own the website get to set the rules. Like it or not, that's the way it is." />
  <row Id="1151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="653" RevisionGUID="ca85a45e-642f-4e2f-8fea-2019aacfeb47" CreationDate="2009-10-14T11:26:28.833" UserDisplayName="Bilgin Kılıç" Text="reputation is a good challenge for whom willing to be famous on google!&#xD;&#xA;regards&#xD;&#xA;bk" />
  <row Id="1152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="644" RevisionGUID="836806a9-c8c0-4aec-a032-400f2a9ecb16" CreationDate="2009-10-13T19:59:18.370" UserDisplayName="unknown (google)" Text="In this age of fluid information exchange it seems odd that a site such as this one, that gives the impression of representing super users, would actually contribute to raising barriers to communication by imposing quotas on opinions (I couldn't put an approval on a previous question because I don't have enough 'reputation').&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be more than happy to be enlightened on the rationale behind this." />
  <row Id="1153" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="644" RevisionGUID="836806a9-c8c0-4aec-a032-400f2a9ecb16" CreationDate="2009-10-13T19:59:18.370" UserDisplayName="unknown (google)" Text="Why so many barriers for newcomers on this dicussion forum?" />
  <row Id="1154" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="644" RevisionGUID="836806a9-c8c0-4aec-a032-400f2a9ecb16" CreationDate="2009-10-13T19:59:18.370" UserDisplayName="unknown (google)" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="1155" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="644" RevisionGUID="a3c06bd1-ed9b-4ffa-a88d-8f46296b76e3" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:32.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/25712/why-so-many-barriers-for-newcomers-on-this-dicussion-forum" Text="" />
  <row Id="1156" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="655" RevisionGUID="581257e4-5ae5-43fa-b0c9-1ec529562e2d" CreationDate="2009-10-14T21:58:54.010" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="Done. All **[ms-access]** changed to **[microsoft-access]** on SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There was only one question I saw with **[access]** that needed to be changed." />
  <row Id="1157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="654" RevisionGUID="435bbd1e-fc46-47f0-9e10-90ca09999035" CreationDate="2009-10-14T21:52:44.427" UserDisplayName="mmyers" Text="On Super User, [microsoft-access][1] has 13 questions while [ms-access][2] has 6. No questions have both tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, [two][3] [questions][4] are tagged 'access' when one of the above would be more appropriate ([access][5] is being used for questions about, well, accessing things).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I realize this is a small enough retag that a normal user could do it, but I don't have enough rep to do it myself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/microsoft-access&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ms-access&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/46161/ms-access-template-where-to-find-the-vb-code&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superuser.com/questions/47302/migrating-ms-access-2003-to-ms-access-2007&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/access" />
  <row Id="1158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="654" RevisionGUID="435bbd1e-fc46-47f0-9e10-90ca09999035" CreationDate="2009-10-14T21:52:44.427" UserDisplayName="mmyers" Text="Please merge the ms-access tag into microsoft-access on Super User" />
  <row Id="1159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="654" RevisionGUID="435bbd1e-fc46-47f0-9e10-90ca09999035" CreationDate="2009-10-14T21:52:44.427" UserDisplayName="mmyers" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1160" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="654" RevisionGUID="d72df445-367f-471d-a269-ed6c12f70d40" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:33.010" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/25915/please-merge-the-ms-access-tag-into-microsoft-access-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1161" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="657" RevisionGUID="7afa4db3-63d1-4f6e-8f4a-1494ca67a769" CreationDate="2009-10-17T14:49:50.167" UserDisplayName="akf" Text="The question you asked was about a video game.  From the [SU FAQ][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;    * computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;    * computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;… and it is **not about videogames or consoles**, then you're in the right place to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not aware of any SO-type site available yet to target videogames, although I can imagine that one would be pretty successful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Why is a single user allowed to close a question on superuser as opposed to 5 on stackoverflow?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Diago is a moderator on SU. Moderators have the power to singlehandedly close questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/faq" />
  <row Id="1162" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="658" RevisionGUID="68d3d736-a1b8-49ae-8ea3-1bfda07020f7" CreationDate="2009-10-17T15:10:15.090" UserDisplayName="David Thornley" Text="This seems to me to be an edge case.  We definitely don't want you asking how to play a video game, or how to win one, or the place will wind up looking like Gamefaqs, with game spoilers crowding anything else out.  On the other hand, asking how to run an older program on a newer OS should be SU material.  I think you've got a legitimate question on a sensitive topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd suggest looking at the documentation to see what it originally ran on, and if possible trying to run it in some sort of compatibility mode.  When you've done that, repost the question without mentioning the program by name, asking for suggestions and assistance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't consider this an end run around the rules, but a way of asking a legitimate question by removing the illegitimate elements.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="659" RevisionGUID="6800b98e-201b-415a-a82c-f683fc8d7bf4" CreationDate="2009-10-17T15:22:27.937" UserDisplayName="Dr. Gonzo" Text="SuperUser isn't for anything specifically gaming-oriented, and that does include game compatibility with operating systems.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there is in fact a place you can ask the question: [SmarterGamer.stackexchange.com][1]. It's one of the new sites built off of the StackOverflow technology, and is a community devoted to gaming in all forms (computer, console, board, role playing, etc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://SmarterGamer.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="1164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="660" RevisionGUID="4f93a5b0-a2b6-4dd2-84af-6f5e4642e138" CreationDate="2009-10-17T15:37:21.857" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I closed this question because it was flagged by various users. As already mentioned and stated in the FAQ no gaming questions are allowed. Also due to the amount of available StackExchange sites regarding gaming this rule will be even more stricter enforced in future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am a diamond moderator on SU and therefore have veto voting rights on any questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For a list of sites regarding gaming you can visit Meta StackExchange [here](http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4/list-of-stackexchange-sites)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;I answered only because I closed the question. The other answers have covered the topic already.&lt;/sub&gt;" />
  <row Id="1165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="656" RevisionGUID="9a46a395-4fb3-44f2-87ae-110667027dab" CreationDate="2009-10-17T14:47:43.867" UserDisplayName="Shiraz Bhaiji" Text="I asked a question on super user about compatibility between windows 7 and sims 2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/56548/is-it-possible-to-run-sims-2-work-on-windows-7-closed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It got closed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there another stack exchange site I could ask this question?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is a single user allowed to close a question on superuser as opposed to 5 on stackoverflow?" />
  <row Id="1166" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="656" RevisionGUID="9a46a395-4fb3-44f2-87ae-110667027dab" CreationDate="2009-10-17T14:47:43.867" UserDisplayName="Shiraz Bhaiji" Text="What kind of questions are allowed on super user?" />
  <row Id="1167" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="656" RevisionGUID="9a46a395-4fb3-44f2-87ae-110667027dab" CreationDate="2009-10-17T14:47:43.867" UserDisplayName="Shiraz Bhaiji" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="1168" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="656" RevisionGUID="0eea07af-098f-4c35-b6d8-ff799de67a06" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:33.593" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/26313/what-kind-of-questions-are-allowed-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="662" RevisionGUID="373ffd54-76ad-4e2e-ac54-1a9144e51cdb" CreationDate="2009-10-19T10:42:07.977" UserDisplayName="pavium" Text="I wonder: Did this coincide with some downtime on Friday?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recall SO was off the air for maybe a couple of hours, but I don't recall exactly when it happened." />
  <row Id="1170" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="663" RevisionGUID="4c8acc66-5427-4f6f-a7d8-691bb1371043" CreationDate="2009-10-19T11:10:09.707" UserDisplayName="Arjan" Text="Are you sure it's the same question? [That user][1] has only been a member since today, and [the question][2] has only been asked 9 hours ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(My guess, based on absolutely no evidence: the user is banned and tries again...? There's [another recent James][3] asking similar things as well.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/14589/james&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/57130/copy-installation-files-that-novell-application-launcher-uses&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/users/14341/james" />
  <row Id="1171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="664" RevisionGUID="984942d7-5534-43b8-8f89-6088c8171f2c" CreationDate="2009-10-19T11:12:06.987" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="It seems your looking at the wrong question. [This](http://superuser.com/questions/55959/install-application-packed-by-snappshot) is the question you answered. It seems like James got cloned, and I am looking into it at the moment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is now only one user James. Both accounts are unregistered so the user may have accessed the site from two different computers. I merged the newest one with the oldest. The two questions are different and I am therefore not closing either. If the community feels otherwise they are welcome to use their voting powers :) " />
  <row Id="1172" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="661" RevisionGUID="647e8abf-9b18-4492-a5d8-36b2d93600a4" CreationDate="2009-10-19T09:31:12.210" UserDisplayName="geoffc" Text="On Friday, I added an answer to [Copy installation files that Novell Application Launcher uses][1] on Super User. I also upvoted the question. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now when I check back today, there is no evidence of either the answer or the upvote.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is up with that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/57130/copy-installation-files-that-novell-application-launcher-uses&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:  In hindsight, I should have looked at my profile, but since the question looked exactly as I remembered it, the user name seemed the same, I just assumed the data had gone missing.  I should have looked further, and seen what Diago saw, that the answer I had posted was still there, but there was a second instance of the question." />
  <row Id="1173" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="661" RevisionGUID="647e8abf-9b18-4492-a5d8-36b2d93600a4" CreationDate="2009-10-19T09:31:12.210" UserDisplayName="geoffc" Text="What happened to my answer? No evidence of vote either" />
  <row Id="1174" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="661" RevisionGUID="647e8abf-9b18-4492-a5d8-36b2d93600a4" CreationDate="2009-10-19T09:31:12.210" UserDisplayName="geoffc" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="1175" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="661" RevisionGUID="83712ccd-518b-44d8-8878-f4e2fd375be9" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:34.400" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/26417/what-happened-to-my-answer-no-evidence-of-vote-either" Text="" />
  <row Id="1176" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="666" RevisionGUID="e56c5fdd-5bb4-470b-bdb4-691fe3bb14b3" CreationDate="2009-10-20T15:46:17.483" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Throw down with a vote to close of this option:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;###Why should this question be closed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;❍ **too localized**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because in the end, those questions are just the same thing over and over again, just with more memory, a better graphics card and debates over what's essential to a new build.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's comparable to a question asking about where to buy a new motherboard on the Isle of Man. It's very localised to that one person and their particular habits and wants from a computer system. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not at all like a question about configuring a program which would benefit others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now that SU has a first page and overspill of users over 3k, it's time to start cracking down on these type of questions." />
  <row Id="1177" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="667" RevisionGUID="fcb2920a-06d3-4651-9a24-29737be63452" CreationDate="2009-10-20T16:22:37.280" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="Sometimes the individual pieces of the question are valid but they either don't give enough criteria to answer them or they're just taking **a shotgun approach to &quot;build my system.&quot;**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe we need another useful reason to close:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Closed - Too general. Question needs to be more specific.]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would cover all questions in the trilogy like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What language should I write my next project in?&#xD;&#xA; - What is the best hardware to buy.&#xD;&#xA; - How can I speed up my system. Do I need to upgrade, etc, etc.&#xD;&#xA; - And the question quoted above: [New Computer Build Questions][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I usually use &quot;not a real question&quot; but it doesn't quite fit. &quot;Too general&quot; says, &quot;Your question isn't bad. You just need to break it down a bit or give more details about your situation.&quot; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/57798/new-computer-build-questions" />
  <row Id="1178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="668" RevisionGUID="4b5c1a99-f380-4422-af9d-33673548ada2" CreationDate="2009-10-20T16:43:29.843" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="If we want these questions to be useful people have to learn something from it. So I think we just need one question, something like: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*What should I pay attention too when building a new computer?*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*What determines the performance of my computer?*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then the answer would describe all important parts that make up performance, price or what not. This way others will learn where to look for next time they want to upgrade their computer instead having to ask it over and over again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If anything relevant changes (new paradigms and such) the post could be edited and everyone is happy!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And else put something like that in the SuperUser FAQ, since it's bound to be asked countless times.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sidenote to the other answers: I don't think we shouldn't have a question like this, it just should be a better question." />
  <row Id="1179" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="670" RevisionGUID="19e2cb98-693f-46c5-8092-5af8fd1927e6" CreationDate="2009-10-20T20:55:02.117" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="They should be closed, either as **subjective and argumentative** or **too localised**. I would use the first if the answers are already becoming argumentative, the later if the question has no answers yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These questions open up a can of worms. It can quickly accelerate into a which is better flame-war, and as already been proven on SU, we do have the die hard Windows or Linux only crowd running around. It is not impossible to have a question like this have pure and honest answers, however it is a rarity. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do however like the samples given by [Ivo](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/26604/superuser-organization-for-new-computer-build-questions/26626#26626). A very specific question around what is needed to build a new computer and what to look for is definitely a good option. However a list of what specific hardware to get if not controlled can quickly get out of hand and will very quickly become outdated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I will admit that this particular question seems to have remained civil, and I am therefore not going to close it myself. I will leave that decision up to the community, or if required, intervene if it does get out of hand and get flagged for moderator attention." />
  <row Id="1180" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="669" RevisionGUID="d75b0327-8862-4e0e-876a-5b41b8c6d12e" CreationDate="2009-10-20T16:45:52.273" UserDisplayName="Ether" Text="These kinds of &quot;build my system&quot; questions could be made community wiki, so that they can be continually updated with recommendations for the latest and greatest hardware as it comes out. There's no need to keep asking new questions when an existing question can be recycled and continually updated." />
  <row Id="1181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="665" RevisionGUID="b940bc26-dedf-4289-bd1d-06df2b143199" CreationDate="2009-10-20T15:40:46.310" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="Ok, I saw another one of these questions come through SU today:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/57798/new-computer-build-questions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Valid questions, but they really become out of date and kind of useless for any future reference. Should we have a specific tag like &quot;hardware-rec&quot; to label any question like this? There are countless other hardware recommendation questions, but the new computer build ones are the most common. I don't find this to be much of an issue, but I figure I would ask to see if we might want to organize better." />
  <row Id="1182" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="665" RevisionGUID="b940bc26-dedf-4289-bd1d-06df2b143199" CreationDate="2009-10-20T15:40:46.310" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="SuperUser organization for new computer build questions?" />
  <row Id="1183" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="665" RevisionGUID="b940bc26-dedf-4289-bd1d-06df2b143199" CreationDate="2009-10-20T15:40:46.310" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="1184" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="665" RevisionGUID="d16971e6-0cba-4551-aa88-e384e6f1ee11" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:35.597" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/26604/superuser-organization-for-new-computer-build-questions" Text="" />
  <row Id="1185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="672" RevisionGUID="6c743175-112f-4f82-a004-105b2bb31a67" CreationDate="2009-10-22T16:18:02.640" UserDisplayName="Rowland Shaw" Text="A name of &quot;unknown&quot; indicates that they have signed in using an OpenId, but have not filled out their profile - the bit in brackets (Google, in this case) is the OpenId provider where they don't provide a nickname." />
  <row Id="1186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="673" RevisionGUID="399db1b6-b141-47cc-bf46-c4b4c31a74e9" CreationDate="2009-10-22T17:56:19.790" UserDisplayName="David Oneill" Text="When I first signed into meta (using my gmail openID), it listed my name as &quot;unknown (google)&quot; until I changed it in my profile.  It is other people signing in using an openID, then never editing their profile." />
  <row Id="1187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="671" RevisionGUID="20fbc150-69ff-4c9a-9064-a52480c7db80" CreationDate="2009-10-22T13:56:06.130" UserDisplayName="kbmonkey" Text="There are a few of them, example: Click on the 'Users' tab and sort by name, they show as &quot;unknown (Google), however they don't show up when you filter the user results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of them even [post replies](http://superuser.com/questions/20972/what-else-do-linux-distros-need-in-order-attract-the-non-geek-user-groups/21564#21564), which read very human and sane.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are these just normal users going through a Google service? Also I did try look for this answer before posting. Thanks for any explanations." />
  <row Id="1188" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="671" RevisionGUID="20fbc150-69ff-4c9a-9064-a52480c7db80" CreationDate="2009-10-22T13:56:06.130" UserDisplayName="kbmonkey" Text="Who is this multiple &quot;unknown (google)&quot; user on SU?" />
  <row Id="1189" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="671" RevisionGUID="20fbc150-69ff-4c9a-9064-a52480c7db80" CreationDate="2009-10-22T13:56:06.130" UserDisplayName="kbmonkey" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="1190" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="671" RevisionGUID="db44247c-5ac5-46be-8590-28f2d07d19b8" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:36.197" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/26922/who-is-this-multiple-unknown-google-user-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1191" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="675" RevisionGUID="28e5fee0-91d9-49ec-9e09-7403eb0a795e" CreationDate="2009-10-26T07:26:35.990" UserDisplayName="Arjan" Text="Flag the post as spam instead. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spam and Offensive flagged posts show up more prominently than normal close votes in the mod tools, they have their own tab. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This will allow moderators quicker direction in the admin. It's not obvious in the mod tools why a post has close votes until you click and bring up the options on the actual post. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Spam flagging  will be a quicker route." />
  <row Id="1192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="676" RevisionGUID="1c4e5287-d0f3-4c86-928e-2658504ad8e6" CreationDate="2009-10-26T07:45:25.920" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="The close as spam option never existed on SU as this is under the flag option available to users with 15 or higher reputation. This option will dock a 100 reputation points from the offender when 5 votes are received. As per [Jeff](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/27277/why-is-the-spam-close-reason-for-questions-missing-on-su/27301#27301) this is intentional as it is meant to be removed across the trilogy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With regards to this particular question. It had been flagged by 2 users, the question deleted and user account destroyed as spam. Therefore only 10K and higher users will be able to follow the link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="677" RevisionGUID="e3ad085b-a489-426f-af09-d3321331bf00" CreationDate="2009-10-26T10:04:20.650" Text="I actually want to remove this close reason from all sites, just haven't gotten around to it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are wayyy too many close reasons, and spam is a bit redundant in the light of spam flags." />
  <row Id="1194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="674" RevisionGUID="6906b88f-2b08-433a-b1b8-843fed79f81f" CreationDate="2009-10-26T07:04:52.690" UserDisplayName="Johannes Rössel" Text="I just came across [a question on Super User](http://superuser.com/questions/60698/superuser-question-text-formatting) I would have liked to close as spam. But looking at the resons for a close vote ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Super User close reasons][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... I noticed that &quot;spam&quot; was missing from that list. Along with others such as &quot;blatantly offensive&quot;. I realize that the different sites need a few different reasons (NPR doesn't really make sense on SU) but leaving out reasons unrelated to a specific site? Or is there no spam on SU by definition?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://hypftier.de/dump/superuser_close_reasons.png" />
  <row Id="1195" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="674" RevisionGUID="6906b88f-2b08-433a-b1b8-843fed79f81f" CreationDate="2009-10-26T07:04:52.690" UserDisplayName="Johannes Rössel" Text="Why is the &quot;Spam&quot; close reason for questions missing on SU?" />
  <row Id="1196" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="674" RevisionGUID="6906b88f-2b08-433a-b1b8-843fed79f81f" CreationDate="2009-10-26T07:04:52.690" UserDisplayName="Johannes Rössel" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;vote-to-close&gt;" />
  <row Id="1197" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="674" RevisionGUID="7281d589-ecac-4b01-b3b5-428e744b717d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:36.717" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/27277/why-is-the-spam-close-reason-for-questions-missing-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1198" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="679" RevisionGUID="765c8913-24b6-456e-bfac-1f77f6d303b9" CreationDate="2009-10-29T20:10:11.997" UserDisplayName="Brad Gilbert" Text="Some of those answers do seem to be generally useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having that question left up, may help questioners provide better questions, so I say leave it up." />
  <row Id="1199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="681" RevisionGUID="235f666b-06f5-48bc-89d5-f48f67583848" CreationDate="2009-10-29T20:14:51.543" UserDisplayName="Ladybug Killer" Text="The first part is a &quot;Best tools for..&quot; questions and the last time I visited SU there where many of them (CW hopefully ;). So I don't think that's a problem.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second part is (more) specific. The system freezes. Yes, he could provide more details, but that is often the case. I don't see a need to close it. Commenting and downvoting if needed should work." />
  <row Id="1200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="684" RevisionGUID="4d95a4f9-5dd3-4ad7-b152-02886d778084" CreationDate="2009-10-29T21:15:21.287" UserDisplayName="Phoshi" Text="This is **not** a catch-all question, it's very specific: `What tools exist for troubleshooting an unstable system?`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Catch-All questions have no place in a Q&amp;A site, IMO." />
  <row Id="1201" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="680" RevisionGUID="6bc5db9f-b73c-4de6-b4fc-268c094a6777" CreationDate="2009-10-29T20:12:56.900" UserDisplayName="avelldiroll" Text="I agree that in this state the question is not really useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could either ask for more informations from the original poster,or edit the question asking more or less: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What does your weapon bag contains for&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bug hunting on linux?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would go for the second option but it should have been asked already (i haven't checked for duplicate)." />
  <row Id="1202" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="682" RevisionGUID="ef69a735-5b0c-4521-92ca-265f330b990e" CreationDate="2009-10-29T20:18:02.920" UserDisplayName="Spoike" Text="If the question isn't useful and the OP only asks for widely different things, you should suggest them to break it up to several questions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There isn't really any good reasons to bunch up questions in one. This is what we have search, tags and your profile page for, right? *Right?*" />
  <row Id="1203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="683" RevisionGUID="7255849d-630f-4b72-b00e-ca2cc23b9875" CreationDate="2009-10-29T20:34:19.937" UserDisplayName="Stephan202" Text="*Decided to post my comment on John's post as a separate answer*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is not uncommon for a user to have a computer issue which is as vague as stated by the OP. Myself I have wondered plenty of times why my laptop froze. There should be a place for these kinds of problems. This question basically allows us to share general troubleshooting techniques.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If we close this question now, eventually another user will pass by with essentially the same open ended question. But this open ended question *is* a very real question: **if Ubuntu freezes for whatever reason, how to I go about finding the cause?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think this question is on topic and can be answered." />
  <row Id="1204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="678" RevisionGUID="01385287-3de4-46f0-a6af-67cbcc3914fe" CreationDate="2009-10-29T20:00:28.097" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Someone posted [this](http://superuser.com/questions/62728/linux-ubuntu-troubleshoting) question on SU regarding troubleshooting Ubuntu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question needs some editing and was posted as a CW, however looking at it the question becomes to generalised when edited, and effectively becomes a catch all questions for any Ubuntu related problems. I am also struggling with closing it because it doesn't seem fair to close it as not a real question, and the other options aren't really relevant at this stage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should we allow these types of questions, or should we insist on their being a specific problem to solve?" />
  <row Id="1205" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="678" RevisionGUID="01385287-3de4-46f0-a6af-67cbcc3914fe" CreationDate="2009-10-29T20:00:28.097" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Should we have catch-all questions on SU?" />
  <row Id="1206" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="678" RevisionGUID="01385287-3de4-46f0-a6af-67cbcc3914fe" CreationDate="2009-10-29T20:00:28.097" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="1207" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="678" RevisionGUID="ab758c95-1b96-4528-b6e8-aa74376a91ab" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:37.600" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/27786/should-we-have-catch-all-questions-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1208" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="686" RevisionGUID="a10ffa2a-1394-420c-8e62-0d7b351d8ce9" CreationDate="2009-10-30T07:05:04.800" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="All 64Bit and x64 tags merged into 64-Bit. " />
  <row Id="1209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="685" RevisionGUID="64cdaf9d-d7a0-4684-a3e7-58e7e0d7b98c" CreationDate="2009-10-30T06:25:49.247" UserDisplayName="DanO" Text="On superuser &quot;64-bit&quot; and&quot; 64bit&quot; tags should be aliased into one or the other.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;x64&quot; is similar, but may be a slightly different animal for some people, being specific to the mainstream AMD architecture? maybe leave that one as is? or not." />
  <row Id="1210" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="685" RevisionGUID="64cdaf9d-d7a0-4684-a3e7-58e7e0d7b98c" CreationDate="2009-10-30T06:25:49.247" UserDisplayName="DanO" Text="Superuser: retag-request for 64-bit, 64bit and maybe x64" />
  <row Id="1211" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="685" RevisionGUID="64cdaf9d-d7a0-4684-a3e7-58e7e0d7b98c" CreationDate="2009-10-30T06:25:49.247" UserDisplayName="DanO" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;&lt;retagging&gt;" />
  <row Id="1212" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="685" RevisionGUID="08b88271-41d8-46bb-a177-e8d8df9d0469" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:38.040" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/27848/superuser-retag-request-for-64-bit-64bit-and-maybe-x64" Text="" />
  <row Id="1213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="688" RevisionGUID="2c40330f-dac4-4f28-83ee-dccac2df47ad" CreationDate="2009-10-30T16:13:48.750" UserDisplayName="beska" Text="I wouldn't downvote the question, because the question is reasonable.  However, you're definitely correct about the strange selection of the accepted answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd just post your concerns in a comment, and let it go at that." />
  <row Id="1214" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="689" RevisionGUID="9e2b857b-fb6a-4119-9460-76346d93867d" CreationDate="2009-10-30T16:15:18.610" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="The OP actually edited his question to say:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Edit: As Pierre pointed out 'move to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; inbox' is now no longer available in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the drop down menu. I guess that we'll&#xD;&#xA;&gt; never know if there was a difference&#xD;&#xA;&gt; between the two functions or not. To&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the GMail programmers: If you have&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fixed the ambiguity based on this&#xD;&#xA;&gt; post, then please say so. It's so nice&#xD;&#xA;&gt; when you see that the developers care&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about their users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I guess that's why he accepted Pierre's answer.  &#xD;&#xA;It does render the question kind of obsolete then though." />
  <row Id="1215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="690" RevisionGUID="1a2f3c52-634a-4d29-8302-907807ba51cf" CreationDate="2009-10-30T20:15:37.400" UserDisplayName="Pollyanna" Text="&gt; Should I down-vote the question because the accepted answer is not a good one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even though Stack Overflow has aspects of a wiki, original authors are given a certain amount of authority to select the best answer for *their* particular situation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The community then selects, through voting, the best answer according to their own reckoning.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question asker should *not* be penalized because it turns out that the most helpful answer to them does not match the most helpful answer as chosen by the community.  This is an example of the system working very, very well.  You'll note that there are many questions where the chosen answer was not the highest voted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you disagree strenuously with the author, then you should post a comment with your reasoning.  Otherwise, it's best to let the system take care of things.  People who come along later from a Google search with a similar question will take the time to read at lest the first few answers, and therefore will get all the highest rated information regardless of what is chosen.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this is a complaint because &quot;rep was given where it wasn't due&quot; then you are simply out of luck.  They posted the question, they can give the answer bonus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stack Overflow was designed to rate questions and answers, **not** users.  Penalizing the *question* isn't going to accomplish anything.  Open a dialog with a comment if you want to change behavior.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding this specific instance, the answer was selected because the author of the answer pointed out that the question is no longer applicable - since there is only one option, then there is no ambiguity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further, the highest voted answer appears to be nothing more than a guess.  He's giving what he would expect to happen, but there's no veracity or authority to his statements.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe in this case the selection of answer is perfectly reasonable." />
  <row Id="1216" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="687" RevisionGUID="33850233-0fd3-43d3-8fd0-3366027692c2" CreationDate="2009-10-30T15:32:14.467" UserDisplayName="The User FormerlyKnownAs Larry" Text="[gmail-not-spam-vs-move-to-inbox][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not sure it can be fixed if that's what the OP thought was the best answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now Gnoupi did give a good answer and has 21 upvotes verses zero votes the accepted answer has, so in a sense the system works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The OP has a relatively low rep, so maybe at the time he didn't understand how the system worked. Is there a way to give the OP feedback on the accepted answer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I down-vote the question because the accepted answer is not a good one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/29339/gmail-not-spam-vs-move-to-inbox/45405#45405" />
  <row Id="1217" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="687" RevisionGUID="33850233-0fd3-43d3-8fd0-3366027692c2" CreationDate="2009-10-30T15:32:14.467" UserDisplayName="The User FormerlyKnownAs Larry" Text="How did this get selected as the accepted answer, it's not even an answer it's a comment" />
  <row Id="1218" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="687" RevisionGUID="33850233-0fd3-43d3-8fd0-3366027692c2" CreationDate="2009-10-30T15:32:14.467" UserDisplayName="The User FormerlyKnownAs Larry" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="1219" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="687" RevisionGUID="a85d612a-3a3b-404c-9e2e-06c1579e6983" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:38.603" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/27885/how-did-this-get-selected-as-the-accepted-answer-its-not-even-an-answer-its-a" Text="" />
  <row Id="1220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="692" RevisionGUID="c7adafd0-5ff8-479d-ac4a-19e593e7aa52" CreationDate="2009-10-31T09:49:47.287" UserDisplayName="Stephan202" Text="You can email `team@superuser.com` and ask them to merge the accounts or delete one of them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, before you do so, please try this (may not work, but it's interesting to know for sure whether it does or does not):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Log in with the account you want to keep.&#xD;&#xA;2. Go to your profile page.&#xD;&#xA;3. Click *add openid*.&#xD;&#xA;4. Log in with the wrong/accidental openid.&#xD;&#xA;5. Tell us what the site says. (Does it offer you to merge the accounts? Does it fail? Something else?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Note that PHP is one of many serverside languages in use these days. This website does not run PHP, so it makes no sense to talk about a &quot;PHP login&quot;. I would also argue that you have it backwards when you say that such a login system is &quot;no-fuzz&quot;, thereby implying that openid is cumbersome: what could possibly be easier than registering to a website *without* having to think up a new username and password?" />
  <row Id="1221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="693" RevisionGUID="00ddd808-8833-4c16-8948-6ddeeefaf8fc" CreationDate="2009-10-31T10:40:57.403" UserDisplayName="pipTheGeek" Text="&quot;Superuser keeps comming up with this new account and logs in automatically. After a force clean of all cookies and cache documents and a restart&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I always found the logout button works well for this very purpose." />
  <row Id="1222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="691" RevisionGUID="28294527-0c63-4888-abf7-288dd8d38ac9" CreationDate="2009-10-31T07:38:11.717" UserDisplayName="bert" Text="Over on Super User, I logged in accidentally with another Gmail account, and created a new profile. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because of all the cookie/JavaScript/IP hocus-pocus, instead of a decent no-fuzz PHP login, Super User keeps coming up with this new account and logs in automatically. After a force clean of all cookies, dumping the cache and a restart, I managed to login with a different user account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, how do I get rid of this accidental account?" />
  <row Id="1223" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="691" RevisionGUID="28294527-0c63-4888-abf7-288dd8d38ac9" CreationDate="2009-10-31T07:38:11.717" UserDisplayName="bert" Text="How do you delete a Super User account?" />
  <row Id="1224" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="691" RevisionGUID="28294527-0c63-4888-abf7-288dd8d38ac9" CreationDate="2009-10-31T07:38:11.717" UserDisplayName="bert" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;user-accounts&gt;&lt;delete&gt;" />
  <row Id="1225" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="691" RevisionGUID="bb4720ef-38ef-4072-8ac4-3735750fe90c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:40.113" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/27960/how-do-you-delete-a-super-user-account" Text="" />
  <row Id="1226" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="695" RevisionGUID="bb622c77-dba7-4195-a280-daa7a70f19cb" CreationDate="2009-10-31T09:25:00.533" UserDisplayName="innaM" Text="Why do you &quot;dislike the JS layer&quot; when that layer makes the site work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;I bought a new car which is really nice. However, I dislike the transmission and disabled it. Now the car isn't working any more. What gives?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;My TV uses too much electrical power. I don't like that so I pulled the plug. Now the TV doesn't work. What should I do?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="696" RevisionGUID="b7f638b1-80fa-470e-8af1-768e392c46a4" CreationDate="2009-10-31T10:59:14.707" UserDisplayName="Phoshi" Text="SU **does** work without JS. It allows you to answer questions WITH it, but searching and finding answers works fine. I see no issue with the warning thingy." />
  <row Id="1228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="697" RevisionGUID="f4ffed4f-daae-406e-b5fb-52488d544bcd" CreationDate="2009-10-31T13:23:30.287" UserDisplayName="balpha" Text="I'm too lazy to search, but on one of the podcasts Jeff said something like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; When people turn off JavaScript, they have to accept that half the internet is broken for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's quite true. Whether you find that good or not---it's a fact. While other sites might show some strange behavior with JS off, on the trilogy sites you at least get a warning. Asking and answering still works; if you want to go into more details of the site (voting etc.) there's no way around turning JS on, at least for the site in question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And that's exactly what the message says: It work's best with JS on---but it somewhat works with JS off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't disagree with your suggestion of a JavaScript-less fallback, but the message doesn't need correction." />
  <row Id="1229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="694" RevisionGUID="4d38cfa0-5a1a-4295-bcf8-d5bfeb925f78" CreationDate="2009-10-31T07:44:00.160" UserDisplayName="bert" Text="Super User says it works best with JavaScript enabled. I would change that message to:&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Super User **does not** work without JavaScript.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I dislike the JS layer, and switched it off, but then the post buttons no longer work. Can someone make the buttons work as normal HTML post buttons when JavaScript is turned off? That way the red message is more correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Strangely enough, the **Post New Question** button DOES work. Although you have to jump through a very complicated Human Being check. But the Answer buttons don't work." />
  <row Id="1230" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="694" RevisionGUID="4d38cfa0-5a1a-4295-bcf8-d5bfeb925f78" CreationDate="2009-10-31T07:44:00.160" UserDisplayName="bert" Text="Why doesn't Super User work without JavaScript?" />
  <row Id="1231" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="694" RevisionGUID="4d38cfa0-5a1a-4295-bcf8-d5bfeb925f78" CreationDate="2009-10-31T07:44:00.160" UserDisplayName="bert" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;" />
  <row Id="1232" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="694" RevisionGUID="42e3372d-c66e-4780-90a0-61bafed1ae9b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:40.520" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/27962/why-doesnt-super-user-work-without-javascript" Text="" />
  <row Id="1233" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="699" RevisionGUID="b40b9eb7-5e2d-42e2-8003-1a2f910042c9" CreationDate="2009-10-31T18:59:38.127" UserDisplayName="squillman" Text="Couple of things&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. do what you did and post here&#xD;&#xA; 2. flag the question for moderator attention and explain your case&#xD;&#xA; 3. although this doesn't apply for you just yet, those with 3K+ rep can vote to reopen" />
  <row Id="1234" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="700" RevisionGUID="56196494-725a-43e2-9369-676cb22b478f" CreationDate="2009-10-31T19:36:04.510" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="I hope you noticed that the *answers* you were getting are essentially the same as those on the original question. You may have had a different goal in mind, but because of the way you asked it folks were just answering by recommending subtitle editors.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You *probably* want to ask for specific directions for *a specific editor*...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**BTW:** it's rude to edit out the duplicate link when your post is still closed as a duplicate. All you're doing is making it harder for folks to find the question they can still answer..." />
  <row Id="1235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="701" RevisionGUID="8bb67133-3535-4d59-8e49-c5c5441a4671" CreationDate="2009-10-31T19:50:26.633" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="**I** am the moderator that closed the post and it will remain closed since the question was which software to use. The second part of the question should be posted as a **new** question since no one answering is even trying to answer the second part of the question, and the answers are the same as in the listed duplicate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The post is now locked. This means there can be no further edits or changes to the post until it is unlocked. I would recommend you ask the second part of the question as a new question which will give you much better results.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some notes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - It clearly states in the closed by reason who closed it with a link to my profile.&#xD;&#xA; - As already mentioned, please don't rollback duplicates, flag for moderator attention.&#xD;&#xA; - You only need to flag for moderator attention once." />
  <row Id="1236" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="698" RevisionGUID="c3d1dda8-d6aa-4d42-8392-4ba577d750cb" CreationDate="2009-10-31T18:56:13.407" UserDisplayName="GiH" Text="I would like to just contact the moderator who closed [this question][1] but I don't know how, so I'm posting here.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The moderator is saying that this question is a duplicate, but I specifically am asking users how to hard code subtitles into a video.  The other one is only asking how to sync the files, and just happened to receive answers that are similar to my asked question about editing.  But still, there is no answer on how to hard code the subtitles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest this gets reopened, if you disagree please tell me why, but I think this question is useful and people who have a similar problem can now easily find my question with answers.  As opposed to finding the wrong question with the right answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/63465/how-do-you-edit-a-srt-subtitles&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="1237" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="698" RevisionGUID="c3d1dda8-d6aa-4d42-8392-4ba577d750cb" CreationDate="2009-10-31T18:56:13.407" UserDisplayName="GiH" Text="How to reopen this question?" />
  <row Id="1238" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="698" RevisionGUID="c3d1dda8-d6aa-4d42-8392-4ba577d750cb" CreationDate="2009-10-31T18:56:13.407" UserDisplayName="GiH" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-declined&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="1239" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="698" RevisionGUID="e39367c7-b73f-45be-a9b3-a0f6ba548d3c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:43.960" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/27995/how-to-reopen-this-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="1240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="703" RevisionGUID="d3bee295-27dc-4759-a163-ece3675d4aae" CreationDate="2009-11-01T22:27:59.647" UserDisplayName="ChrisF" Text="Well, right at the beginning of the [faq][1] it states:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;* computer software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; … and it is **not about videogames or consoles**, then you're in the right place to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it looks like in this, hypothetical, case you're OK.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually I think questions about connecting consoles to your home network were mentioned somewhere as being OK, though I can't find the reference at the moment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/faq" />
  <row Id="1241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="704" RevisionGUID="6414d557-4e78-4b7d-b50b-4265f683cb9e" CreationDate="2009-11-01T23:09:45.923" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="Here is my take on this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- If you are using micro standard computers adapted for the mobile auto market, good question for SU.&#xD;&#xA;- If you are using a computer/laptop to interface with custom/stock car computers for engine management and have questions reguarding software and setup related materials, good question for SU.&#xD;&#xA;- If you are asking about the stock ECU car computer/control unit for engine/car management and troubleshooting, SU might not be the best place for a question in that arena. That would be more of a car forum or community question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a question uses a standard computer piece of hardware or software in some way, then it will most likely be ok for SU. Don't be afraid to ask on meta on what is appropriate question material.  Most people will gladly inform you on question guidance." />
  <row Id="1242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="702" RevisionGUID="adf7052b-7238-41dc-a184-6a9af03b23f8" CreationDate="2009-11-01T22:23:09.533" UserDisplayName="Maxim Z." Text="Most of the questions I see or ask on SuperUser are regarding computer software or hardware, but would other forms of technology that somehow connect to computing be valid questions? For example, would a question about the internal computer of a car be OK? (not that I want to ask such a question :D )" />
  <row Id="1243" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="702" RevisionGUID="adf7052b-7238-41dc-a184-6a9af03b23f8" CreationDate="2009-11-01T22:23:09.533" UserDisplayName="Maxim Z." Text="SuperUser question scope" />
  <row Id="1244" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="702" RevisionGUID="adf7052b-7238-41dc-a184-6a9af03b23f8" CreationDate="2009-11-01T22:23:09.533" UserDisplayName="Maxim Z." Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;scope&gt;" />
  <row Id="1245" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="702" RevisionGUID="8b456d32-6fc8-4faa-a62e-af648a460244" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:45.193" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/28075/superuser-question-scope" Text="" />
  <row Id="1246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="706" RevisionGUID="f2f3aa81-e91d-4e48-8764-a892f801e5a3" CreationDate="2009-11-04T21:47:56.663" UserDisplayName="AnonJr" Text="Not having sufficient rep to check, I would guess it's been deleted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Occasionally questions or answers may be removed from Super User for reasons of moderation: spam, off topic, abuse, etcetera.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Had it been closed or moved you would still be able to see it." />
  <row Id="1247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="707" RevisionGUID="557cb3ce-51d5-4918-8219-7d57de466f65" CreationDate="2009-11-04T21:48:10.003" UserDisplayName="squillman" Text="What was the question about?  Most likely it was either deleted or merged (as a duplicate) with another question.  An SU mod or someone with 10K rep could tell for sure." />
  <row Id="1248" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="708" RevisionGUID="2004f2e8-3bb9-4079-aee2-497024f0e94e" CreationDate="2009-11-04T22:10:27.123" UserDisplayName="Andrei " Text="Are you sure it hasn't been moved to a different SO site? Search for it on Super User, Server Fault, etc." />
  <row Id="1249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="709" RevisionGUID="fe652889-32d7-49d0-97c7-bf2d81886996" CreationDate="2009-11-05T09:05:55.390" Text="Sorry, I thought it was a duplicate. I undeleted it, and edited it." />
  <row Id="1250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="705" RevisionGUID="532d5864-4cbd-4b6f-bc5c-37f9d4ca6e0e" CreationDate="2009-11-04T21:40:25.647" UserDisplayName="cometbill" Text="This morning I posted two questions on superuser.com, [65438][1] and 65444. The latter, 65444, seems to have vanished. Can anyone please tell me where it's gone to?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: the question was about using Disk2VHD to clone my desktop XP multi-boot PC to VHD so that I can run it under Virtual PC on my laptop.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/65438/disk2vhd-xp-cloning" />
  <row Id="1251" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="705" RevisionGUID="532d5864-4cbd-4b6f-bc5c-37f9d4ca6e0e" CreationDate="2009-11-04T21:40:25.647" UserDisplayName="cometbill" Text="My question disappeared" />
  <row Id="1252" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="705" RevisionGUID="532d5864-4cbd-4b6f-bc5c-37f9d4ca6e0e" CreationDate="2009-11-04T21:40:25.647" UserDisplayName="cometbill" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="1253" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="705" RevisionGUID="63d6316f-5abe-46de-a915-61424720e4ff" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:55.283" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/28601/my-question-disappeared" Text="" />
  <row Id="1254" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="711" RevisionGUID="c6627d89-e720-49b5-88dd-33d5c1d49485" CreationDate="2009-11-10T20:33:25.733" Text="Not really a bug; a user inappropriately syntax highlighted an enormous block of non-code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(also worked fine in Chrome, which has an outstanding JavaScript engine -- join the power!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just un-indented it and used `&lt;pre&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;` instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;update: we don't do syntax highlighting on Super User any more, so this issue is moot." />
  <row Id="1255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="710" RevisionGUID="e27a6c19-2ce1-4175-950f-2a29e0d6cd74" CreationDate="2009-11-10T20:23:32.957" UserDisplayName="joe" Text="Just now , one user posted question : http://superuser.com/questions/68649/help-me-with-my-cisco-ios-config. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When ever i am clicking that question Browser hangs for some time and recovered and show message for unresponsive script error message &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The message is this and asking for stop script or continue &#xD;&#xA;&gt;A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding. You can stop the script now, open the script in the debugger, or let the script continue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Script: http://sstatic.net/su/js/master.js?v=5005:1" />
  <row Id="1256" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="710" RevisionGUID="e27a6c19-2ce1-4175-950f-2a29e0d6cd74" CreationDate="2009-11-10T20:23:32.957" UserDisplayName="joe" Text="Browers hangs for super user question" />
  <row Id="1257" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="710" RevisionGUID="e27a6c19-2ce1-4175-950f-2a29e0d6cd74" CreationDate="2009-11-10T20:23:32.957" UserDisplayName="joe" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-declined&gt;" />
  <row Id="1258" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="710" RevisionGUID="0e8516ab-f34e-46dc-b614-506e26b6e8b5" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:00:58.477" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/29278/browers-hangs-for-super-user-question" Text="" />
  <row Id="1259" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="713" RevisionGUID="fad3e596-ad76-4204-b5a8-a9d0a8db23b2" CreationDate="2009-11-11T19:25:31.690" UserDisplayName="Austin Salonen" Text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/about&quot;&gt;http://superuser.com/about&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Scroll all the way to the bottom. Look for the diamonds... ♦" />
  <row Id="1260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="714" RevisionGUID="6ed9786a-6f88-469f-b2ec-3539b43ce3a6" CreationDate="2009-11-11T20:04:01.403" Text="If you want things closed use the flag command to flag them for moderator attention please.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/04/raising-a-red-flag/" />
  <row Id="1261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="712" RevisionGUID="180f137d-ed0b-4fbc-bc5b-c4a04def4ae5" CreationDate="2009-11-11T19:23:56.250" UserDisplayName="joe" Text="Who are the moderators of Super User?  &#xD;&#xA;I don't see any moderator presence online right now to close out questions I want closed." />
  <row Id="1262" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="712" RevisionGUID="180f137d-ed0b-4fbc-bc5b-c4a04def4ae5" CreationDate="2009-11-11T19:23:56.250" UserDisplayName="joe" Text="Who are the moderators of Super User?" />
  <row Id="1263" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="712" RevisionGUID="180f137d-ed0b-4fbc-bc5b-c4a04def4ae5" CreationDate="2009-11-11T19:23:56.250" UserDisplayName="joe" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;moderators&gt;" />
  <row Id="1264" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="712" RevisionGUID="5cb56680-909a-4be0-8434-9787f102b322" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:01.257" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/29364/who-are-the-moderators-of-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="716" RevisionGUID="90e1e6c2-facb-4e84-93a8-94f19bc4c16c" CreationDate="2009-11-13T08:23:19.803" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I have done the following merges. I used the latter since it is the most commonly used.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;kbd&gt;virtual-machine&lt;/kbd&gt; --&gt; &lt;kbd&gt;vitualmachine&lt;/kbd&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;kbd&gt;vm&lt;/kbd&gt; --&gt; &lt;kbd&gt;virtualmachine&lt;/kbd&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I am not merging &lt;kbd&gt;virtualization&lt;/kbd&gt; since it has a different meaning to &lt;kbd&gt;virtualmachine&lt;/kbd&gt;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="715" RevisionGUID="cbce6e20-52b7-4a96-bb3c-cdda089aa59d" CreationDate="2009-11-13T07:15:39.173" UserDisplayName="GiH" Text="I noticed a similar question [here][1], but it seems nothing has been done...  On superuser there are tags for virtualmachine and virtual-machine.  I think these two at the least should be merged, if not also merge virtualization with it.  I mean first of all, virtualization is not a word haha... and second, it doesn't make sense to have two or three tags for the same thing.  Redundant and inefficient.  Please merge them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7929/change-virtualmachine-and-virtualdesktop-to-virtual-machine-and-virtual-desktop" />
  <row Id="1267" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="715" RevisionGUID="cbce6e20-52b7-4a96-bb3c-cdda089aa59d" CreationDate="2009-11-13T07:15:39.173" UserDisplayName="GiH" Text="Merge tags on superuser [virtualmachine], [virtual-machine], and [virtualization]" />
  <row Id="1268" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="715" RevisionGUID="cbce6e20-52b7-4a96-bb3c-cdda089aa59d" CreationDate="2009-11-13T07:15:39.173" UserDisplayName="GiH" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1269" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="715" RevisionGUID="38e1314b-515f-49ed-b3ed-0aa2d8273fca" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:02.343" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/29543/merge-tags-on-superuser-virtualmachine-virtual-machine-and-virtualization" Text="" />
  <row Id="1270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="718" RevisionGUID="f0912a40-2a37-4ea5-9ff3-ee7ad45ea147" CreationDate="2009-11-18T19:57:52.707" UserDisplayName="Phoshi" Text="That's google! They're giving you a result that may be relevant within the domain you searched for. It's normal, and totally not under anybody's control but google's. Sometimes it's helpful, but in fringe cases like this, maybe not so much." />
  <row Id="1271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="719" RevisionGUID="77b05162-a34b-4116-8406-c61f5539eace" CreationDate="2009-11-18T20:46:22.260" UserDisplayName="Al Everett" Text="Those are known as sitelinks and Google Webmaster tools allows one to block them. Blocking links that shouldn't be there helps their algorithm, they say.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=47334&amp;hl=en][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=47334&amp;hl=en" />
  <row Id="1272" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="720" RevisionGUID="6aa08db4-2517-4c17-9bdb-646b5f7a331e" CreationDate="2009-11-19T07:53:21.927" Text="Good point, I blocked the 3+ users that were showing up here via the [Google Webmaster Tools](https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No offense, I &amp;lt;3 all SU users, but I think we want stuff like /faq and /questions and /users in Google SiteLinks -- not individual users!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(we've done this before for SO and SF as well, so it's fairly common...)" />
  <row Id="1273" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="717" RevisionGUID="a04c27ca-e22a-445b-bf75-4e7d4bc2ce88" CreationDate="2009-11-18T18:38:27.047" UserDisplayName="Paul Sheldrake" Text="If you google &quot;superuser&quot; one of the sitelink options is a user account.  Is that suppose to happen?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/598/picture2go.png" />
  <row Id="1274" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="717" RevisionGUID="a04c27ca-e22a-445b-bf75-4e7d4bc2ce88" CreationDate="2009-11-18T18:38:27.047" UserDisplayName="Paul Sheldrake" Text="Unusual Google Sitelinks for &quot;superuser&quot;" />
  <row Id="1275" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="717" RevisionGUID="a04c27ca-e22a-445b-bf75-4e7d4bc2ce88" CreationDate="2009-11-18T18:38:27.047" UserDisplayName="Paul Sheldrake" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="1276" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="717" RevisionGUID="03c83a9b-6341-4bec-b7f6-3fffa5e3ed6b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:02.923" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/30247/unusual-google-sitelinks-for-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="722" RevisionGUID="b0c0f53f-015f-49ac-b7f2-5ec912cce19b" CreationDate="2009-11-20T19:09:00.517" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="From the thread that was closed, this is the response from Jeff Atwood:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This is specific-website related but not really computer related. We try to avoid pure &quot;support for X website&quot; questions, as they are best suited on forums that specialize in X website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**That seem to be pretty clear and &quot;official stance&quot; to me.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just because a similar post *wasn't* closed, I wouldn't interpret that as the exception that disproves the rule. It's still a community-moderated site and edge cases are still subject to the whims and mood of the day. Some posts just squeak by, despite what the *guidelines* say." />
  <row Id="1278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="723" RevisionGUID="03dcba5e-878d-4b3e-b850-f1f31522a024" CreationDate="2009-11-20T20:32:15.407" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="I think questions about specific web sites don't belong on Super User. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;As the [faq][1] states:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is for computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; enthusiasts and power users. If you&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have a question about ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; * computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; … and it is not about videogames or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; consoles, then you're in the right&#xD;&#xA;&gt; place to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The specific question you mention (http://superuser.com/questions/73214/facebook-profiles-for-non-people-okay) is definitely a no go and I voted to close it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This one (http://superuser.com/questions/61974/find-out-when-someone-defriends-me) I also voted to close. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This one (http://superuser.com/questions/4366/facebook-upload-problem-with-the-java-photo-uploader) is ok as it appears to be a problem with the OP's browser's cookies. A computer software problem, so fine with the faq.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/faq" />
  <row Id="1279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="724" RevisionGUID="f3a9720e-46bc-44a9-9f85-28e89d882a57" CreationDate="2009-12-03T04:28:52.963" Text="In addition to what I said here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This is specific-website related but not really computer related. We try to avoid pure &quot;support for X website&quot; questions, as they are best suited on forums that specialize in X website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;a clarification: *some* Facebook questions may be OK:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; we only support Facebook questions if they relate to software tools that work with Facebook, or ways to get software (or other websites) to work with Facebook.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically a mashup type argument. It can't be about Facebook alone, because we're not a Facebook website support forum; there have to be hundreds of better places for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So this is OK, **because it involves making another app/website work with Facebook:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/51972/how-to-make-facebook-notifications-feed-to-work-with-google-reader&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But this is not OK, **because it's purely about the Facebook web site alone:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/78144/how-do-i-make-someone-else-the-owner-of-a-group-on-facebook-closed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Greasemonkey stuff is obviously OK as well, since that falls under the category of &quot;tool that works with a website&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1280" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="725" RevisionGUID="acc9d707-265b-4315-8d4f-6e529f1d2007" CreationDate="2009-12-03T07:08:16.967" UserDisplayName="Joel Spolsky" Text="I think it's getting really hard to distinguish between sites and apps any more. More and more &quot;software&quot; is moving to the web. I don't think the &quot;specific website&quot; criteria is going to be clear enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How about this as a rule: questions about how to make a software/site work are OK. But questions about what to do with the software/site once you’ve got it working (i.e. strategies) are not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**OK:**  &#xD;&#xA;FACEBOOK: How do I add a friend?   &#xD;&#xA;FACEBOOK: How do I make it so that people in my group can see a particular dog photo but not all dog photos?  &#xD;&#xA;GMAIL: How to I send email to a lot of people on the BCC line without anyone on the TO line?  &#xD;&#xA;EBAY: How do I make bold text in an auction listing?  &#xD;&#xA;PHOTOSHOP: How do I create a jelly bean effect?  &#xD;&#xA;WINDOWS: How do I make Explorer show photos in order by date?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**NOT OK:**  &#xD;&#xA;FACEBOOK: This guy has been harassing me, if he sees me unfriend him I think he’ll come to my house with a bat.   &#xD;&#xA;FACEBOOK: I’m a CEO. Should I add my employees as “friends”?    &#xD;&#xA;GMAIL: I’m buried in email. What are your strategies for email/life balance?  &#xD;&#xA;EBAY: What’s a good reserve price for this comic book?  &#xD;&#xA;EBAY: What should I do about unfair negative reviews?  &#xD;&#xA;PHOTOSHOP: What’s a good way to improve this photograph?  &#xD;&#xA;PHOTOSHOP: Rate my photo composition!  &#xD;&#xA;WINDOWS: How do I use my computer to find my damn car keys?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="726" RevisionGUID="e9dda61a-d6c3-4432-9cc9-a8ea54733376" CreationDate="2010-01-25T20:05:14.477" UserDisplayName="John Saunders" Text="I think that the distinction between a desktop application and a web-based application is an arbitrary one; possibly a distinction that no longer makes a difference.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To the extent this is true, what's the distinction between a web site and a web application?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="721" RevisionGUID="7cd65851-bfad-4a24-97b4-70eb6a210b39" CreationDate="2009-11-20T18:40:58.710" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="http://superuser.com/questions/73214/facebook-profiles-for-non-people-okay&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, there are many questions that reference Facebook, but this one seems to be directly about facebook.  I need an official meta thread to point people to beyond the FAQ on Facebook questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Previous questions have been closed as not computer related:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/59692/do-facebook-group-wall-posts-appear-for-all-groups-or-only-those-you-are-a-member&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But this one was ok?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/61974/find-out-when-someone-defriends-me&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions like this to me seems good to have though:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/4366/facebook-upload-problem-with-the-java-photo-uploader&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Whats ok and not?  I thought most facebook stuff is not SU material?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is the Facebook help discussion forums.  Beyond the common questions posted in the help section, you can post any question you like in the &quot;Help Discussions&quot; section.  You pick the topic and sub topic and then post the question there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/help/?ref=pf#/help/?section=community&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1283" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="721" RevisionGUID="7cd65851-bfad-4a24-97b4-70eb6a210b39" CreationDate="2009-11-20T18:40:58.710" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="Official stance on Facebook questions on SU?" />
  <row Id="1284" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="721" RevisionGUID="7cd65851-bfad-4a24-97b4-70eb6a210b39" CreationDate="2009-11-20T18:40:58.710" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="&lt;faq&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;close-reasons&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="1285" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="721" RevisionGUID="119a4e88-5b63-4522-a22c-28ff4e84c03a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:03.707" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/30475/official-stance-on-facebook-questions-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="728" RevisionGUID="7da620e6-8199-447b-8ed4-773fc3246c4d" CreationDate="2009-11-27T22:33:53.103" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Small is the number  &#xD;&#xA;Retag done manually  &#xD;&#xA;It's all good for now." />
  <row Id="1287" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="727" RevisionGUID="be327293-a64c-4e9f-94ac-3aa1eb176ee7" CreationDate="2009-11-27T22:13:16.137" UserDisplayName="Maxim Z." Text="The 'windows-7' tag has 1752 questions, while the 'windows7' tag has only 2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep: 'windows-7'" />
  <row Id="1288" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="727" RevisionGUID="be327293-a64c-4e9f-94ac-3aa1eb176ee7" CreationDate="2009-11-27T22:13:16.137" UserDisplayName="Maxim Z." Text="Retag Request/Tag Merge Request for Super User: 'windows7' and 'windows-7'" />
  <row Id="1289" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="727" RevisionGUID="be327293-a64c-4e9f-94ac-3aa1eb176ee7" CreationDate="2009-11-27T22:13:16.137" UserDisplayName="Maxim Z." Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1290" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="727" RevisionGUID="cc474046-2800-4fa1-9574-b062795f01ad" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:05.303" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/31203/retag-request-tag-merge-request-for-super-user-windows7-and-windows-7" Text="" />
  <row Id="1291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="730" RevisionGUID="e2f245d6-c910-4063-a4ac-213901b75599" CreationDate="2009-11-29T12:44:15.663" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Click through to any one of the answers that he's updated/edited.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Most, if not all, of them have been rollbacks on posts by one particular user (now currently suspended) who changed their answer content to something along the lines of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [How do I delete a Super User account?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [How do I delete a Super User account? I'm a ROBOT.][2]&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/revisions/62971/list&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/revisions/75098/list" />
  <row Id="1292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="729" RevisionGUID="2b9281fc-98b6-4bf2-9d77-f5aedeb0632d" CreationDate="2009-11-29T12:31:06.857" UserDisplayName="Wil" Text="If you go to Superuser and scroll down a little, there are **many** entries with Splattne's name against them. I have gone in and can't see any sort of change, retag, answer or deleting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this something the system does at random? However, why is it with a mods name instead of community or similar?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I looked in the tools as well, but I saw nothing under closed or deleted and as I haven't see this before, I couldn't help but wonder!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i49.tinypic.com/x1leg3.jpg" />
  <row Id="1293" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="729" RevisionGUID="2b9281fc-98b6-4bf2-9d77-f5aedeb0632d" CreationDate="2009-11-29T12:31:06.857" UserDisplayName="Wil" Text="Superuser: mass system changes?" />
  <row Id="1294" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="729" RevisionGUID="2b9281fc-98b6-4bf2-9d77-f5aedeb0632d" CreationDate="2009-11-29T12:31:06.857" UserDisplayName="Wil" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;wtf&gt;" />
  <row Id="1295" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="729" RevisionGUID="64dee8d5-1bc1-426b-b343-89eb87e8454c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:05.537" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/31296/superuser-mass-system-changes" Text="" />
  <row Id="1296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="732" RevisionGUID="53621331-272f-4440-aa02-c854c528a499" CreationDate="2009-12-08T20:48:29.967" UserDisplayName="mmyers" Text="That tag was `belongs-on-serverfault` when the question was [on SO][1]. Apparently something went wrong with the auto-removal of `belongs-on-*` tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1868640/how-do-you-view-all-threads-running-on-linux-closed" />
  <row Id="1297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="733" RevisionGUID="83cc0c2a-82f5-4292-b919-2de82079e1cf" CreationDate="2009-12-08T20:49:25.627" UserDisplayName="Brandon" Text="Maybe Jeff is stripping out the &quot;belongs-on-&quot; tags that questions have before they get migrated which is creating an empty tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This might get fixed by the daily vote sync script." />
  <row Id="1298" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="731" RevisionGUID="770ea15f-5b2c-456e-a7b2-108a5f95d45a" CreationDate="2009-12-08T20:41:06.017" UserDisplayName="Al Everett" Text="[This question][1], as of this moment, has a &quot;null&quot; tag. There are four tag &quot;buttons&quot;: linux, tools, &quot;null&quot;, and threads.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Retag&quot; simply shows two spaces between &quot;tools&quot; and &quot;threads&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Didn't try to fix it to allow troubleshooting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/80556/how-do-you-view-all-threads-running-on-linux" />
  <row Id="1299" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="731" RevisionGUID="770ea15f-5b2c-456e-a7b2-108a5f95d45a" CreationDate="2009-12-08T20:41:06.017" UserDisplayName="Al Everett" Text="null tag bug on Super User?" />
  <row Id="1300" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="731" RevisionGUID="770ea15f-5b2c-456e-a7b2-108a5f95d45a" CreationDate="2009-12-08T20:41:06.017" UserDisplayName="Al Everett" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="1301" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="731" RevisionGUID="7fb222f1-9fb2-45cc-bdf1-14ff3327cf59" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:05.957" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/32343/null-tag-bug-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1302" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="735" RevisionGUID="159e3cf4-77a5-4314-ac09-959405363653" CreationDate="2009-12-11T12:47:34.360" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="&lt;kbd&gt;internal-hardrive&lt;/kbd&gt; merged with &lt;kbd&gt;hard-drive&lt;/kbd&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;kbd&gt;network-hard-drive&lt;/kbd&gt; merged with &lt;kbd&gt;hard-drive&lt;/kbd&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't see a need to change the others. The &lt;kbd&gt;external-harddrive&lt;/kbd&gt; change requires the tag to be created, and since it is already commonly used I am not 100% convinced that it needs to be changed at this stage.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="734" RevisionGUID="00cff8a5-1064-4644-80a6-c367783ee0b7" CreationDate="2009-12-10T14:07:03.860" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="HDD-related tags on SuperUser:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - hard-drive (291)&#xD;&#xA;  - external-harddrive (91)&#xD;&#xA;  - internal-harddrive (6)&#xD;&#xA;  - network-hard-drive (1)&#xD;&#xA;  - hard-drive-failure (28)&#xD;&#xA;  - hard-drive-image (2)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the dash-enabled `hard-drive` is a good standard, so this request is for moving&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - `external-harddrive` to `external-hard-drive`&#xD;&#xA;  - `internal-harddrive` to `internal-hard-drive`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: Actually, I don't see much reason for keeping a separate `internal-hard-drive` tag.  It should probably be merged with `hard-drive`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit 2**: Bump.  This has gotten the `status-completed` tag, but I'm not seeing any changes.  Does this mean the request was confusing, or should it have gotten a `status-declined`?" />
  <row Id="1304" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="734" RevisionGUID="00cff8a5-1064-4644-80a6-c367783ee0b7" CreationDate="2009-12-10T14:07:03.860" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="Retag request: on SuperUser, rename external-harddrive to external-hard-drive" />
  <row Id="1305" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="734" RevisionGUID="00cff8a5-1064-4644-80a6-c367783ee0b7" CreationDate="2009-12-10T14:07:03.860" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1306" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="734" RevisionGUID="a9f1c56c-0375-45a0-b416-54eab917c6f1" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:06.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/32574/retag-request-on-superuser-rename-external-harddrive-to-external-hard-drive" Text="" />
  <row Id="1307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="737" RevisionGUID="3a06582b-0a7a-42e3-a5ad-024e088432ce" CreationDate="2009-12-11T13:51:51.947" UserDisplayName="ベレアー アダム" Text="Find the link.  If he posted it here, add a response to his question or answer.  If it's on [userscripts.org][1], there's facilities there for discussion and reporting issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://userscripts.org/" />
  <row Id="1308" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="738" RevisionGUID="04c2c9f0-9204-4528-9a2c-d9d1166aa222" CreationDate="2009-12-11T17:37:52.023" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="Well, you could always email me I suppose... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Failing that, describe in a comment exactly *how* it's not working. Or, since you have this question sitting here anyway, do it here and include screenshots of a Reputation page with hand-drawn circles outlining the bit where the rep cap summary was supposed to show up but isn't." />
  <row Id="1309" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="736" RevisionGUID="c56da9a1-cbf2-4224-b9ac-abbaaa7da198" CreationDate="2009-12-11T13:33:23.353" UserDisplayName="C. Ross" Text="I'm having trouble getting one of the GreaseMonkey scripts that Shog9 wrote to work ([The DailyRepLimit][1] tracker).  Should I post the question on how to fix it here or on superuser?  GreaseMonkey in general is working, because the question dashboard is working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The issue: &#xD;&#xA;  Question marks instead of symbols.  This is in Firefox 3.5.5.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Image FAIL][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Screenshot is from my page, works the same way on everyone's page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/32087/how-close-are-you-to-an-epic-legendary-badge/32164#32164&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/1885/soshog9error.png" />
  <row Id="1310" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="736" RevisionGUID="c56da9a1-cbf2-4224-b9ac-abbaaa7da198" CreationDate="2009-12-11T13:33:23.353" UserDisplayName="C. Ross" Text="SO GreaseMonkey Support - Here or SuperUser" />
  <row Id="1311" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="736" RevisionGUID="c56da9a1-cbf2-4224-b9ac-abbaaa7da198" CreationDate="2009-12-11T13:33:23.353" UserDisplayName="C. Ross" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;meta-meta&gt;&lt;greasemonkey&gt;" />
  <row Id="1312" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="736" RevisionGUID="697514e7-8aa2-4a17-82e7-543bdeb8061a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:06.480" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/32687/so-greasemonkey-support-here-or-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1313" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="740" RevisionGUID="b09e5cb3-e285-4ac2-ae30-0d16a404367e" CreationDate="2009-12-12T23:24:22.233" UserDisplayName="Ladybug Killer" Text="According to the [FAQ][1] your question is best suited for the [WolframAlpha support forum][2]. Looks like closing it was correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/30475/official-stance-on-facebook-questions-on-su/31659#31659&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://community.wolframalpha.com/" />
  <row Id="1314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="741" RevisionGUID="82511151-d825-4a15-9b6f-84904f8924fc" CreationDate="2009-12-13T00:04:43.830" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="Macha, the question sucks. Fix it or stop whining. Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Edit:** to clarify, the question sucks because the author doesn't properly explain how his query is different from numerous other queries that produce the same result, he doesn't cite documentation that contradicts the results he's seeing, and most importantly **he doesn't back up his assertion as to the results he expects**. If he's gonna come up on to SU and whine about a problem he's having using a certain piece of software, *then he should at least tell us what he's tried* - if he's just trying to report a bug, then SU is the wrong place, since SU isn't in charge of some random website. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So again, *fix it or stop whining*. **]**" />
  <row Id="1315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="742" RevisionGUID="190e4b73-14c7-4710-aaa0-7b1275bdb813" CreationDate="2009-12-13T14:12:50.500" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="It amazes me how whenever this question comes up, people are quick to pull out samples of **old** questions that are similar that has been kept.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**These question either flew under the radar, or policy changed after they were posted**. Simply put it means we will **now** close those questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the closing questions, I run through the close list at least 2 - 3 times a day, and will close questions if I am certain that the reasons are valid. This question was in no way **computer software or hardware related**. Most websites have support forums to cover these in detail, and questions for them should be kept within their own domain. SU is not a trash can, nor is it a free-for all, every question goes site. It has a purpose, and at least 95% of the time that purpose is met.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="743" RevisionGUID="4b66c92d-c9be-431a-bb1c-ca39d9effb2c" CreationDate="2009-12-14T14:02:03.443" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="The question you pointed to is not computer related and it can't be answered by any of us; I would have voted to close as well. However, not all Wolfram|Alpha questions are strictly not computer related. I'll explain below:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Roboto][1], in a comment to Shog9's [answer][2], said:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; So my question that I posted last week&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about a Windows XP problem I was&#xD;&#xA;&gt; having should of been directed to a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Microsoft support forum? Just curious&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a completely different thing (most of the times). When you have a Windows XP problem, it can usually be solved one way or another via a workaround, a hack, some simple app or even by following a tutorial.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, when something doesn't quite work the way you want to in a web app, such as Wolfram|Alpha, you can't just edit the registry (or use a Greasemonkey script) and make it do what you want, it's a simple **support question**, something the **site owners** must fix. This is the main difference; there was absolutely nothing we could have done to help him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can be applied to software as well. For instance, if you ask a question about volume licensing, or some other legalese stuff that's not in the EULA or on a Microsoft page, it becomes a support problem that we can't fix or can't help you with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And, for reference, one of the Facebook questions Diago closed after reading your question was partly computer related. Someone asked [here][3] about exporting contacts from Facebook. Both the answers given pointed to software that was able to solve his problem, thus making the question computer related. Let's not try to blindly fit everything into categories without actually looking at the bigger picture!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/users/139168/roboto&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/32792/wolfram-alpha-not-computer-related/32799#32799&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/66143/export-facebook-contacts-as-vcard" />
  <row Id="1317" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="739" RevisionGUID="84263f53-98f2-4078-9ca4-40eb8b217f1c" CreationDate="2009-12-12T22:37:46.610" UserDisplayName="Macha" Text="On SuperUser, earlier today, Diago closed [this question](http://superuser.com/questions/82370/find-a-plane-for-four-point-by-wolframalpha) on Wolfram Alpha as not computer related. I fail to see how it isn't computer related. Or how it is different from the [several](http://superuser.com/questions/28253/how-to-automatically-duplicate-your-twitter-updates-to-facebook-and-vice-versa) [Facebook](http://superuser.com/questions/40179/facebook-asking-for-email-password-and-privacy-questions) [questions](http://superuser.com/questions/16849/facebook-as-image-hosting-service-reasonable-use-or-leeching) [on](http://superuser.com/questions/66143/export-facebook-contacts-as-vcard) [SuperUser](http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/facebook).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Or](http://superuser.com/questions/19788/can-someone-explain-the-fascination-with-twitter-com) [the](http://superuser.com/questions/75400/why-doesnt-twitter-search-work-with-the-from-operator-w-my-username) [questions](http://superuser.com/questions/2596/why-are-you-using-twitter) [on](http://superuser.com/questions/64783/understanding-the-mechanics-of-twitter-conversations) [Twitter](http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/twitter)." />
  <row Id="1318" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="739" RevisionGUID="84263f53-98f2-4078-9ca4-40eb8b217f1c" CreationDate="2009-12-12T22:37:46.610" UserDisplayName="Macha" Text="Wolfram Alpha not computer related?" />
  <row Id="1319" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="739" RevisionGUID="84263f53-98f2-4078-9ca4-40eb8b217f1c" CreationDate="2009-12-12T22:37:46.610" UserDisplayName="Macha" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="1320" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="739" RevisionGUID="77b7e6e7-5096-4f72-8d4a-ba0ccda9ccf0" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:07.123" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/32792/wolfram-alpha-not-computer-related" Text="" />
  <row Id="1321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="744" RevisionGUID="789a74bd-3d01-4fde-babd-a82daf5d95c5" CreationDate="2009-12-16T15:49:12.493" UserDisplayName="Phoshi" Text="I asked a [question](http://superuser.com/questions/83513/what-can-i-do-with-a-large-hard-drive) about external HDDs recently, and noticed the hard-drive tag and the external-harddrive tag are totally inconsistent. Any chance of a retag?" />
  <row Id="1322" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="744" RevisionGUID="789a74bd-3d01-4fde-babd-a82daf5d95c5" CreationDate="2009-12-16T15:49:12.493" UserDisplayName="Phoshi" Text="SU Retag Request: [external-harddrive] --&gt; [external-hard-drive]" />
  <row Id="1323" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="744" RevisionGUID="789a74bd-3d01-4fde-babd-a82daf5d95c5" CreationDate="2009-12-16T15:49:12.493" UserDisplayName="Phoshi" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-declined&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1324" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="744" RevisionGUID="b8871503-7f54-4b94-9c74-12d9e82c8fdd" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:09.597" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/33160/su-retag-request-external-harddrive-external-hard-drive" Text="" />
  <row Id="1325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="746" RevisionGUID="9fdd7f5e-f0a5-4451-8ffe-6802a039d83e" CreationDate="2009-12-18T11:46:22.977" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="If the questions are related to the programming APIs then the best place would be SO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it is about twitter in general, you need to use the twitter support sites, as this is outside of the scope of S[OFU]. Twitter falls under the same category as Facebook discussed [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/30475/official-stance-on-facebook-questions-on-su)" />
  <row Id="1326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="747" RevisionGUID="40babf3e-4536-440f-a46f-3cc592f9bf66" CreationDate="2009-12-18T14:05:15.253" UserDisplayName="ベレアー アダム" Text="Not all computer-related questions are covered by S[OFU] sites, and I think this topic falls in the set of things not covered (except, as Diago pointed out, Twitter programming questions).  Questions about video games are another good example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's quite arbitrary, but nobody ever claimed that all things computer-related should be covered on one of the sites." />
  <row Id="1327" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="745" RevisionGUID="fdaf8990-0ed4-4152-bee0-37d0319ad68f" CreationDate="2009-12-18T11:31:36.843" UserDisplayName="Thilo" Text="Are questions about Twitter (or other web services) on-topic for Superuser?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If not, which StackOverflow-based forum should one use?" />
  <row Id="1328" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="745" RevisionGUID="fdaf8990-0ed4-4152-bee0-37d0319ad68f" CreationDate="2009-12-18T11:31:36.843" UserDisplayName="Thilo" Text="Questions about Twitter on Superuser?" />
  <row Id="1329" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="745" RevisionGUID="fdaf8990-0ed4-4152-bee0-37d0319ad68f" CreationDate="2009-12-18T11:31:36.843" UserDisplayName="Thilo" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;twitter&gt;" />
  <row Id="1330" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="745" RevisionGUID="46e3d874-3976-47d6-b7f6-f70cb2f145d4" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:09.873" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/33321/questions-about-twitter-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="749" RevisionGUID="4c5bfbf7-1779-41e5-9703-27aecedf8ea8" CreationDate="2009-12-22T07:53:09.113" Text="Hmm, I am not sure what OS this phone is running.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_c5212_duos_preview-review-322p3.php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, you need a fairly advanced mobile web browser to use SO. I know that Windows Mobile 6+, iPhone (all versions), Android (all versions) work OK." />
  <row Id="1332" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="748" RevisionGUID="fc8c8bb8-d34d-4771-94c7-07dc661e1b7c" CreationDate="2009-12-22T00:07:31.603" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="I try to log into SuperUser from my mobile phone, but it fails. I can easily browse the pages of SuperUser, but when I click on &quot;login&quot; and then select my OpenID account provider, it doesn't work. Is it because of the phone? My mobile phone is Samsung C5212." />
  <row Id="1333" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="748" RevisionGUID="fc8c8bb8-d34d-4771-94c7-07dc661e1b7c" CreationDate="2009-12-22T00:07:31.603" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="Logging into SuperUser via mobile phone" />
  <row Id="1334" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="748" RevisionGUID="fc8c8bb8-d34d-4771-94c7-07dc661e1b7c" CreationDate="2009-12-22T00:07:31.603" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;login&gt;&lt;mobile&gt;" />
  <row Id="1335" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="748" RevisionGUID="62a78bd1-8fbe-4339-8fea-748777ec7557" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:10.337" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/33597/logging-into-superuser-via-mobile-phone" Text="" />
  <row Id="1336" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="751" RevisionGUID="e0f5b7b3-fe12-44a9-b78b-7545071c386c" CreationDate="2010-01-01T22:16:03.250" UserDisplayName="Jon Skeet" Text="According to my [rep tracker][1] it's from the [&quot;`/var/run` on debian&quot;][2] answer - that's received 5 upvotes and 2 downvotes; it shows as +46 on my tracker.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure why you're not seeing those downvotes yourself though...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://csharpindepth.com/StackOverflow/ReputationTracker.aspx?so=&amp;sf=&amp;su=6998&amp;meta=&amp;mode=today&amp;showflair=true&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/90114/90116#90116" />
  <row Id="1337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="752" RevisionGUID="f85cc31d-1b84-427f-9c85-4076fc7a618c" CreationDate="2010-01-02T01:40:46.573" UserDisplayName="Ether" Text="Your screenshot shows the &quot;summary&quot; tab of your user history; what does the &quot;reputation&quot; tab show? The former only shows the top 5 scoring &quot;recent&quot; events; the latter shows all of them (especially when you explicitly click &quot;today&quot; to be sure the time frame is correct). If you have had a number of upvotes recently, you need to select &quot;reputation&quot; to see your downvotes." />
  <row Id="1338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="753" RevisionGUID="6f75ff2e-8c06-4503-901f-0942c2b22904" CreationDate="2010-01-02T02:15:08.380" UserDisplayName="Carlos Heuberger" Text="if you narrow the time slice on the reputation graph, you can see the affected answers on the right side&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;narrowing is not really needed, but helps... sometimes looking in the future - advancing end date by 1 or 2 days - is also needed...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/547/reputation.jpg" />
  <row Id="1339" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="750" RevisionGUID="02a501b8-2284-4b3b-8873-99601d93b4ef" CreationDate="2010-01-01T22:01:25.827" UserDisplayName="Phoshi" Text="So today I've had a fair few upvotes, no downvotes - reached 6660 on SU, then went and had some tea. Came back, 6668. Damn, a downvote! Who has offended my honour so?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nobody, apparently. Now my rep is on 6666, and both my rep chart and recent activity page show no reason for this. I don't mind the rep change, but I'd love to know what's going on? Is this the fabled rep-recalc, and if so, why is it taking so much time? Are there sinister forces at work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For illustrative purposes, here's an image showing both my current rep, my no-downvotes recent user page, AND how much rep I've gained today (my, aren't you lucky)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![My reputation, it's no longer a round number][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2502059/SUR.png" />
  <row Id="1340" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="750" RevisionGUID="02a501b8-2284-4b3b-8873-99601d93b4ef" CreationDate="2010-01-01T22:01:25.827" UserDisplayName="Phoshi" Text="What is happening to my SU rep? (Or, how is my rep changing before my eyes!)" />
  <row Id="1341" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="750" RevisionGUID="02a501b8-2284-4b3b-8873-99601d93b4ef" CreationDate="2010-01-01T22:01:25.827" UserDisplayName="Phoshi" Text="&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="1342" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="750" RevisionGUID="de439a35-d369-4316-98b9-98694cf3b4aa" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:10.653" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/34299/what-is-happening-to-my-su-rep-or-how-is-my-rep-changing-before-my-eyes" Text="" />
  <row Id="1343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="755" RevisionGUID="a6efc169-3c9b-44f1-b811-764b508f3236" CreationDate="2010-04-03T09:41:10.077" UserDisplayName="random" Text="The **[torrents]** tag was phased/merged a while back. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It now no longer shows any questions tagged as such." />
  <row Id="1344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="756" RevisionGUID="08237fb2-8ada-444a-b299-ea228a697250" CreationDate="2010-05-03T14:09:38.340" UserDisplayName="Jon Seigel" Text="Since this was originally posted (TYVM Community User), 7 questions popped up with `[torrent]` on SO. I manually retagged them all to `[bittorrent]`." />
  <row Id="1345" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="754" RevisionGUID="c8189e2c-a75b-4391-a346-8a1f83740ca3" CreationDate="2010-01-03T00:07:23.933" UserDisplayName="Ether" Text="- 15 questions [tagged 'torrent' on superuser][1]&#xD;&#xA;- 48 questions [tagged 'bittorrent' on superuser][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Only 'bittorrent' is used on SO and SF.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/torrent&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/bittorrent" />
  <row Id="1346" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="754" RevisionGUID="c8189e2c-a75b-4391-a346-8a1f83740ca3" CreationDate="2010-01-03T00:07:23.933" UserDisplayName="Ether" Text="Retag request: torrent -&gt; bittorrent" />
  <row Id="1347" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="754" RevisionGUID="c8189e2c-a75b-4391-a346-8a1f83740ca3" CreationDate="2010-01-03T00:07:23.933" UserDisplayName="Ether" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1348" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="754" RevisionGUID="ac4de255-0dec-433f-9993-003f4c902152" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:11.087" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/34368/retag-request-torrent-bittorrent" Text="" />
  <row Id="1349" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="758" RevisionGUID="247192db-1cce-4040-a188-0ddcbc431b1a" CreationDate="2010-01-15T12:33:10.213" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="I think you're absolutely right Diago! This way there doesn't have to be a discussion about why Facebook questions are closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Plus it might help offering suggestions to alternative Stackexchange sites for these topics if they do exist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just on a side-note: is a smartphone a mobile device? As in iPhones?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1350" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="759" RevisionGUID="1d5ddc35-d2d5-4363-bc23-80533374ec96" CreationDate="2010-01-17T08:01:14.453" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="Great idea Diago!  I can link to the FAQ more often instead of meta discussions. I don't think it will calm people down any when their questions get closed, but at least it will be officially stated in the FAQ from now on. Thanks to Jeff for updating this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh, and congrats to Ivo on joining the SU mod team! " />
  <row Id="1351" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="757" RevisionGUID="215d39b5-146b-4f58-bad6-8753108d74c2" CreationDate="2010-01-15T12:08:48.227" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="With the changes made to the policies recently, and the amount of hits SuperUser is taking at the moment, I would like to suggest that the current FAQ is updated as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - computer hardware &#xD;&#xA; - computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;… and it is not about &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - videogames or consoles&#xD;&#xA; - websites or web services like facebook, twitter and wordpress&#xD;&#xA; - cellphones or mobile devices excluding iPhones&#xD;&#xA; - electronic devices or media players&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; then you're in the right place to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't believe it should be a big list but these are the common one's that seems to cause tension during the closing of questions. It's useful to just direct people to the FAQ rather then having to type a comment every time." />
  <row Id="1352" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="757" RevisionGUID="215d39b5-146b-4f58-bad6-8753108d74c2" CreationDate="2010-01-15T12:08:48.227" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Update the SuperUser FAQ" />
  <row Id="1353" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="757" RevisionGUID="215d39b5-146b-4f58-bad6-8753108d74c2" CreationDate="2010-01-15T12:08:48.227" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;faq-update-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1354" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="757" RevisionGUID="b3af583e-85fc-4b6b-9e2d-a6442d84f994" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:11.367" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/35733/update-the-superuser-faq" Text="" />
  <row Id="1355" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="761" RevisionGUID="6e640ba7-f4f1-4d60-b505-5766791df78a" CreationDate="2010-01-18T07:48:22.137" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="No.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only does these questions have a short lifespan, they are usually very geographically localized. I have no use what so ever for shopping tips in the US.   " />
  <row Id="1356" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="762" RevisionGUID="2989fad6-0826-419c-9f01-53626898f894" CreationDate="2010-01-18T07:48:40.590" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Recommendations on where to buy or what to buy make the trigger finger jump at the &quot;too localized&quot; option in the close menu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They may be computer related, but most of it is helping people buy things that are wholly specific to their budget, location and/or purchase whims.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not like having to work out why a router is failing or configuring an FTP client to with through SSH.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe even &quot;subjective and/or argumentative&quot; if the question is pushing it." />
  <row Id="1357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="763" RevisionGUID="59056dd4-f5a6-4cea-a91f-582b94f0a6cd" CreationDate="2010-01-18T08:06:08.147" Text="This SU question you cited is OK in my opinion&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/96934/any-cheap-and-good-mouse-with-extra-buttons&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because it's &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- somewhat timeless&#xD;&#xA;- relatively constrained in scope&#xD;&#xA;- sort of fun -- show mice with a ridiculous number of buttons!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now **in the general case, I definitely agree with you**. Highly localized, time-specific &quot;what should I buy?&quot; questions are of little value and should be strongly discouraged. (Maybe the /faq needs updating with some text here?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the question you cited is a weak example of the problem. Perhaps Diago or Splattne or Ivo can edit your question to include better examples.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: an excellent example was referenced, one in which the author re-asked in a *much better way!*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before -- bad  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/97038/which-usb-sticks-are-reliable&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After -- good  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/97035/tool-to-test-usb-sticks&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Cheers to Tony." />
  <row Id="1358" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="764" RevisionGUID="10db9ab8-3174-4021-bd06-486b026c3a04" CreationDate="2010-01-18T08:33:18.523" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="To clarify: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My problem is not keeping these questions on SU, my problem is with the **quality** of the questions being kept on SU. Jeff recently pointed out that SU has 1.2M hits a month, which is by no means a small amount, and the reach of the site is higher then SO solely because of the general purpose theme when searching on Google. These questions tend to get out of hand later one with drive by postings, and are often not well maintained.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have no issues with someone putting some effort into looking for a product, or even asking for a reasonable comparison. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Asking based on price is also a sensitive topic. To use the above example, a few of the below $50.00 mice listed on that page are way more than $50.00 in SA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Explicitly localised shopping or service questions are closed outright, and lately I have not even debated the question as to why. If a **worldwide** audience is not involved, then it doesn't belong." />
  <row Id="1359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="765" RevisionGUID="a04ea6db-b676-4ef5-a50b-5cd672b301bd" CreationDate="2010-01-18T08:34:25.713" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="In a way, you say such questions shouldn't be... and yet you answer them. Like I said on another question, more than a problem in people asking questions, you have a problem in people running to answer before checking for duplicates, or even wondering if the question is correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There was even one asking on meta for a &quot;mind-reader&quot; badge for &quot;finding the correct answer to a badly asked question, lacking details&quot;. If people are ready to jump through hoops to answer questions which are not matching, or are not describing a problem correctly, this is where we have a problem. People should encourage askers to ask good questions, precise ones, and not jump to answer anything.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I agree that some more rules on some specific kind of questions like these shopping ones wouldn't hurt, as it would make things more clear in rules. I disagree though with:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SuperUser really is heading in&#xD;&#xA;&gt; multiple directions, although no one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in the community seems to know what&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these are or whether they're good or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bad. The way things are going, I feel&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it is turning into a Trilogy Yahoo!&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Answers, despite the efforts of a lot&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of its users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion there are people, and lot of them, who know how to steer the website in the good direction. Diago typically was a good choice of moderator, as he is rarely letting borderline questions alive, he is rather known to close on sight. Other users with enough reputation to close are detecting questions to close and doing the job, too. The problem only is that people tend to complain about it, because they argue that their question was &quot;computer related&quot;, etc. What we need here is indeed a more precise FAQ, to have a reference of what should and should not be, but only as a reason to close, given to users who ask wrong questions. Because initially, people moderating are doing an acceptable job, I believe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would argue though that there are not enough moderators like Diago, as he is doing (*in my humble opinion, but it could be linked to the fact I am on SU only in the European time range*) 80% of the moderation job on SU. I hope that Ivo replacing TheTXI will help in that. Note that this is linked also to the fact we still don't have that many 3000+ users, so it's hard to get 5 votes fastly, usually it needs a moderator to come by and make the final close, with only 1 or 2 votes.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="766" RevisionGUID="56727ff8-2224-4f41-8bb4-d4bb93771454" CreationDate="2010-01-18T09:48:04.920" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="It would probably help if the FAQ would exclude certain question groups from being asked, making it easier for moderators to close them without getting complaints afterwards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though the fact that these kind of questions are being asked indicates that people do want a platform to ask them. **We need more StackExchange sites for these topics!**" />
  <row Id="1361" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="760" RevisionGUID="47175a04-cf7c-4c37-9810-2179d6278d0f" CreationDate="2010-01-18T07:36:22.570" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="I've seen a recent surge in questions asking for recommendations on buying X type of hardware (replace X with mice, GPUs, CPUs, hard drives, flash drives, you name it). Looking at TheTXI's answer [here][1], I feel these questions don't belong on SuperUser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Diago seems to at least partially agree on this one. He left the following comment on a [question][2] yesterday:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SU Is not the shopping channel.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel the same way. These questions have a very short life span; hardware is obsolete in a matter of months. People have argued that making these questions CW allows others to edit them and keep them up-to-date. I have never seen this happening. Someone wants something, he asks, gets an answer and that's the end of that question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SuperUser really is heading in multiple directions, although no one in the community seems to know what these are or whether they're good or bad. The way things are going, I feel it is turning into a Trilogy Yahoo! Answers, despite the efforts of a lot of its users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5778/help-define-superuser-com/5782#5782&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/96934/any-cheap-and-good-mouse-with-extra-buttons" />
  <row Id="1362" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="760" RevisionGUID="47175a04-cf7c-4c37-9810-2179d6278d0f" CreationDate="2010-01-18T07:36:22.570" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="Should shopping and/or hardware recommendation questions be allowed on SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="1363" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="760" RevisionGUID="47175a04-cf7c-4c37-9810-2179d6278d0f" CreationDate="2010-01-18T07:36:22.570" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="1364" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="760" RevisionGUID="a58b032b-408d-449a-af16-1a12f6e1e979" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:12.307" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/36056/should-shopping-and-or-hardware-recommendation-questions-be-allowed-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="768" RevisionGUID="aab6e51b-8745-450b-ae45-aa0a28741a8e" CreationDate="2010-01-19T14:45:24.910" UserDisplayName="Dr. Gonzo" Text="We now know what Apple had in store for today's event. It's officially dubbed the iPad, and is in fact a tablet form-factor modified iPhone-OS-running computer-like device. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am personally of the mindset that this would be completely appropriate material for Super User. (However, I'm also of the mindset that Palms, Windows Mobile devices, Google Android devices and iPod Touches should be, too. Should size and a physical keyboard be what truly defines a computer?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, ultimately, I think it should be left to the moderators at Super User to make that decision. Diamonds, we await your word!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Side note: My Moses wisecrack wasn't 100% off, but it was close. Instead of Steve himself playing the role, he used an image of Moses and the tablets, and a quote from *The Wall Street Journal:* &quot;Last time there was this much excitement about a tablet, it had some commandments written on it.&quot;)" />
  <row Id="1366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="769" RevisionGUID="492664d5-7a11-461d-803d-d15653be7883" CreationDate="2010-01-27T19:04:04.997" Text="The /faq is already pretty clear on this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and it is not about …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - videogames or consoles&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - cellphones or mobile devices, except smartphones such as iPhone that **interface with your computer**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - electronic devices or media players, **except insofar as they interface with your computer**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ahem. *INSOFAR AS THEY INTERFACE WITH YOUR COMPUTER.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, iPad should have its own specific [Stack Exchange](http://stackexchange.com) site, a community of avid iPad users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Go start one!" />
  <row Id="1367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="770" RevisionGUID="18559f43-83f9-4ea0-9c8b-f68904860938" CreationDate="2010-01-27T19:28:29.090" UserDisplayName="Pollyanna" Text="SU is not a &quot;insert company product name here&quot; support forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So general purpose iPad questions are not acceptable." />
  <row Id="1368" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="771" RevisionGUID="57272b23-ff62-4cf4-8acf-9ef7b37124d5" CreationDate="2010-04-04T20:27:26.113" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="I don't really see a difference between an iPad and an iPhone, besides the size and the lack of a phone capability for the iPad. The issues remain the same, they are particular to the device, and only this device.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really think that questions on Super User should be about computers, regular ones, the ones on which you have control over the OS you install, the application you install, and what you do with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The iPad, in my opinion, does not meet these criterias.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This remains of course my personal opinion, with no more value than that." />
  <row Id="1369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="772" RevisionGUID="2136ea1a-3e38-4380-8c8e-2702de0a609f" CreationDate="2010-04-05T08:52:23.713" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="Given that the currently highest voted answer states it should be allowed and that a diamond mod (other than Jeff I guess) should respond: voila here I am!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I went over to the [Stack Exchange Meta list][1] and quote:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Smartphones&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ===========&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; -  [AppQandA.com][2] - Your Mobile App Source. Questions, Answers, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Reviews for any mobile application on&#xD;&#xA;&gt; any device or platform.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - [EXC_BAD_ACCESS][3] - iPhone development questions.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - [Force Close][4] - Android operating system.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - [iPhoneGameDev][5] - iPhone game development questions.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - [Know.BBHACKER.com][6] - BlackBerry questions.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - [PhoneHow][7] - how to for everything smartphone, and every&#xD;&#xA;&gt; smartphone + iPad &amp; iPod Touch!&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - [Slide to Ask][8] - iPhone and iPod Touch.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So we have several iPhone and other smartphone related SE-sites. Someone explain to me why Super User needs to allow these kind of questions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problems I do see is that (currently) there is some fragmentation and you can't be sure what site will gain the most traffic, the best users and most importantly the best answers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, Super User already has higher traffic than these SE-sites, so it would be 'easier' for getting answers on you question there. Personally I'd love to see an API solution that simply let's me browse all SE and trilogy sites for interesting topics through one highly customizable portal. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That way, everyone will have their own version of the SE-sites based on what they personally like. If you're a programmer that doesn't like other topics to cloud his frontpage: good for you, go follow C# on SO alone. But that doesn't mean that there are other people who would like to follow other topics with the same ease.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As has been mentioned in similar discussions: even though someone likes Stack Overflow doesn't mean they instantly like Server Fault or Super User. However, that fact ignores all the users that do! It has been suggested by letting SF/SU question pop up to SO audience could draw a lot of SO's much larger traffic to the other sites. Now I don't want to clutter the Stack Overflow homepage, but do see potential for the API to create a medium here. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This could then also work for Super User and other SE-sites on smartphones, gaming consoles and other peripherals or web-apps. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Stop cluttering Super User with other topics and fix the problem, not the symptoms!**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4/list-of-stackexchange-sites&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.appqanda.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.excbadaccess.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://forceclose.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://iphonegamedev.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://know.bbhacker.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://phonehow.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://slidetoask.com/" />
  <row Id="1370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="773" RevisionGUID="759a3087-b2df-4c2e-814b-8081643ed60f" CreationDate="2010-06-07T16:12:23.440" UserDisplayName="Kyle Cronin" Text="I've proposed a Stack Exchange-based Apple site that you can ask iPad questions on. Just go  [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/151/apple?referrer=EmsxHuwirbI%3d) and click &quot;Follow&quot; to help get the site up and running." />
  <row Id="1371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="767" RevisionGUID="ea75101a-d460-403c-a3cb-12300251000e" CreationDate="2010-01-19T14:34:01.020" UserDisplayName="Chris W. Rea" Text="Will an Apple tablet device (iPad) be a &quot;[computery][1]&quot; enough subject for questions on Super User?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I plan to get one, and since I've never owned an iPhone or anything similar, I'm sure I'll have some questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**UPDATE:**&#xD;&#xA;Looks like a lot of iPad questions on SuperUser have been getting closed.  Is there official policy or is that just the ad hoc / organic decision making process at work, and the mods have more or less decided iPad is off-topic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/13289/is-asking-phone-questions-permitted-on-superuser/13291#13291" />
  <row Id="1372" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="767" RevisionGUID="ea75101a-d460-403c-a3cb-12300251000e" CreationDate="2010-01-19T14:34:01.020" UserDisplayName="Chris W. Rea" Text="Will iPad be acceptable subject matter for Super User?  I guess not?" />
  <row Id="1373" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="767" RevisionGUID="ea75101a-d460-403c-a3cb-12300251000e" CreationDate="2010-01-19T14:34:01.020" UserDisplayName="Chris W. Rea" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;&lt;appropriate&gt;" />
  <row Id="1374" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="767" RevisionGUID="f31372d8-35a5-41d6-8957-e8cf264c10bf" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:13.497" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/36202/will-ipad-be-acceptable-subject-matter-for-super-user-i-guess-not" Text="" />
  <row Id="1375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="775" RevisionGUID="682affcc-6277-4ec2-895c-44ee3be705b4" CreationDate="2010-01-20T09:43:02.847" UserDisplayName="random" Text="###Yes&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If they come back and they ever do get around to updating their question with relevant information or interest, then the community can then re-open them." />
  <row Id="1376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="776" RevisionGUID="9ba4c01d-68f2-4c3c-8780-a6127b8fb0fc" CreationDate="2010-01-20T10:52:16.617" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="I completely agree, BUT&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;please leave a comment as to why you don't think it's no longer relevant. Makes it easier for the moderators to judge what you think makes it so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually this should go for every closing reason" />
  <row Id="1377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="777" RevisionGUID="c30aae3c-f5f7-4398-b939-0949563bf11a" CreationDate="2010-01-20T11:03:10.883" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="The idea is nice, I kind of, sort of agree with you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's not that easy, though. There should be a way to mark such questions as being inactive. If the questions are **completely inactive** (no new answers, comments and edits) close them as being no longer relevant. The minimum time should be 2 months since the last activity on it (a long time, during which the question will surely get bumped by Community).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There should be **clear rules** for this, otherwise we're going to have big problems with angry users! Also, it should be easier to reopen such questions. Could there perhaps be a way for moderators to see both the inactive questions that are eligible for closure and the ones that have had hits on them (comments or edits)? Just have a different tab, specially for this." />
  <row Id="1378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="774" RevisionGUID="208eb108-1022-4060-8532-daf1adb37952" CreationDate="2010-01-20T09:25:28.753" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="SuperUser has a much higher ratio of &quot;personal&quot; question. I mean that many questions are linked to one user only, with his particular configuration. Of course his question can be of help to other people, when it got an answer, and given that the user was providing the correct feedback.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, there are plenty of questions which are rather abandoned, because the user only asked them and left them there, without adding more details or anything. A good example of this is when a question is migrated from SO or SF, to SU, and the author just left it like this, didn't create another account or associated it. Typically, we know that this one will never evolve, and with lacking details will never be &quot;answered&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Example of a question for which the author didn't come back since nor commented the answer: http://superuser.com/questions/71146/how-to-share-dial-up-internet-via-bluetooth&#xD;&#xA; - Other example, a migrated question never claimed back on SU: http://superuser.com/questions/72458/copied-files-using-cygwin-isnt-found-using-samba&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since these questions are not answered, they will occasionally pop to the front page, adding noise.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it's obvious that the original poster will never update his question (never took ownership back, or simply never visited since then), can we consider that he will never be interested in the answer, or maybe found it somewhere else? And in this case, should we close them as &quot;no longer relevant&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:** I talk mostly about closing the ones which pop on front page, because going for a hunt on all old questions would be taking quite some time ;-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1379" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="774" RevisionGUID="208eb108-1022-4060-8532-daf1adb37952" CreationDate="2010-01-20T09:25:28.753" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="Should we close old questions with no more feedback as &quot;no longer relevant&quot;, on SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="1380" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="774" RevisionGUID="208eb108-1022-4060-8532-daf1adb37952" CreationDate="2010-01-20T09:25:28.753" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;no-longer-relevant&gt;" />
  <row Id="1381" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="774" RevisionGUID="957062b0-4a4e-46ab-8df6-77f474e282e4" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:14.907" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/36296/should-we-close-old-questions-with-no-more-feedback-as-no-longer-relevant-on-s" Text="" />
  <row Id="1382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="779" RevisionGUID="86c9bf78-fd0a-4084-91a6-64e9b453f095" CreationDate="2010-01-21T20:39:28.050" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="&quot;Sticky&quot; doesn't really scale; I've seen far too many PHPBB systems where the first page (or more!) of each forum is completely lost to sticky posts... which are *still* ignored by new users. Even when &quot;READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!!!&quot; *is* appended to their titles...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One possibility is a [tag-specific FAQ][1], where you could link to the canonical questions. If this was expanded to give questions so linked a bit of priority in the &quot;Related&quot; lists, that could help with closing the inevitable duplicates more easily... and keep them fresh enough in the minds of users that they might have at least a shot at staying up-to-date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another possibility would be a system that [keeps track of duplicate links][2]. If this were used to increase ranking in search and related lists (PageRank-style), then again it could help promote the use of a single canonical question when closing new duplicates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/1195/allow-a-per-tag-home-faq-page&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/36366/please-provide-a-table-of-duplicates" />
  <row Id="1383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="780" RevisionGUID="4e5f3d25-8800-494d-a5eb-ae037f8db6d8" CreationDate="2010-01-22T00:19:23.223" UserDisplayName="random" Text="The problem is with the users.  Both high-rep and newcomers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's a difference betweeen not knowing how to search, and not *wanting* to search at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And then you have those with close level rep and flag/comment level rep answering what they themselves know to be dupe answers on dupe questions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But they post answers anyway, so that they can net one or two upvotes. And if someone else votes to close as dupe they'll *maybe* vote too. Maybe." />
  <row Id="1384" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="781" RevisionGUID="b645568a-f9ca-470a-a121-35cb73a4ba6a" CreationDate="2010-01-22T02:45:07.743" UserDisplayName="Pollyanna" Text="Yes, it works very well.  For example, I made this question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8401/where-can-i-ask-questions-that-arent-programming-questions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty early on for SO so that we would have a nice easy place to send people when we closed their questions.  I'd always leave a comment, &quot;Voting to close as not programming related, please see -link- for other sites where you might be able to get a better answer.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your suggestion is only slightly different, but it requires a good set of moderators that regularly close as dupe.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think SU has suffered a little bit more than the other sites due to very busy official moderators recently.  Now that SU has new official moderators, you should see fewer problem questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind that it's still a fairly 'new' site in terms of users - you've only got 54 people that can close questions.  To some degree it's a wild west.  Since there aren't that many 3k+ moderators, consider flagging questions for moderator attention that are obviously out of bounds or duplicates, as the official moderators can take action more quickly." />
  <row Id="1385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="778" RevisionGUID="1ddf4512-37be-492f-a105-097190493e7f" CreationDate="2010-01-21T20:21:56.843" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="SuperUser is haunted by repeated questions on topics as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Antivirus suggestions&#xD;&#xA;- Virus/Spyware removing&#xD;&#xA;- Best practices for troubleshooting common problems&#xD;&#xA;- Best buy guides for hardware and software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In contrast to StackOverflow and ServerFault, SuperUser visitors aren't always as computer savvy or lack the searching skills to first look for an answer on our site before creating their own version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to see that these questions get one master version that is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- community wiki  &#xD;&#xA;- gets updated (when needed)&#xD;&#xA;- easily visible to new users&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This could be done by giving them a more prominent spot (as a sticky) or by suggesting them when people use certain keywords. But at least this way we can close all these related or duplicated questions and refer them to one questions for each topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that this won't take care of all duplicates, but at least it's a start. Any suggestions for other effective solutions are more than welcome&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1386" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="778" RevisionGUID="1ddf4512-37be-492f-a105-097190493e7f" CreationDate="2010-01-21T20:21:56.843" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="&quot;One question to rule them all&quot; questions on SuperUser" />
  <row Id="1387" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="778" RevisionGUID="1ddf4512-37be-492f-a105-097190493e7f" CreationDate="2010-01-21T20:21:56.843" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;duplicates&gt;" />
  <row Id="1388" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="778" RevisionGUID="a279fccd-1c1f-4cf8-910c-001a5911559e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:16.627" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/36508/one-question-to-rule-them-all-questions-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1389" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="783" RevisionGUID="263865c7-cbf6-46d8-bd0f-2ccb8c5c980f" CreationDate="2010-01-25T12:38:21.373" UserDisplayName="Ladybug Killer" Text="This is doomed to failure. Why should the majority of the SO community care what rules are made up on SU? They are just not interested in. But they want to help this guy who asked a non-programming question. They know, if they  close it on SO he will not get any help. If they migrate it to SU the chance exists that his questions could be answered there. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can bring up the argument of the junk yard again, but complaining about that will not solve the issue. I could imagine that a special moderator view (including 10k users) for migrated questions would make it easier to close these questions (if they are inappropriate for SU). If this does not already exist, it would be worth thinking about it." />
  <row Id="1390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="784" RevisionGUID="6eaaacaa-ce0e-4a10-b525-1f5de97d65d5" CreationDate="2010-01-27T20:05:49.520" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="[I gotta agree with John here][1]... Your objective is noble, but doomed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Background: The pressing need for a SO dumping ground&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For its first year of existence, Stack Overflow faced a constant battle between users who wanted a site *dedicated* to programming questions and users who liked the format and wanted to use the site for... *any topic that interested them.* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;UserVoice, the blog, and Stack Overflow itself were filled with the anguished and often angry cries of users who had been slapped down, told that their questions about harddrives, games, office politics, and favorite peripherals weren't appropriately &quot;programming related&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It got ugly. *Really* ugly. Much uglier than any discussions surrounding bits of text should ever get. When a group of users becomes so used to being called &quot;fascists&quot; that they actually petition the site for a badge *recognizing* this dubious distinction, that's too ugly. And as the site grew more and more popular, it just kept getting worse... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Super User: a light at the end of the tunnel&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[When Super User was announced][2], there was one criteria for the questions asked there: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If your question has to do with computers, it will be allowed there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This was a welcome announcement for many. Even those of us who didn't plan on actually *using* the site, as it signed an end, at long last, to the tiring arguments, close wars, and bad-blood between users who wanted a programming site and users who wanted a &quot;computer things&quot; site. The ability to migrate questions meant that an off-topic question couldn't be easily re-opened on Stack Overflow, but could still be answered - a rare win-win for both camps. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###A site about everything is a site about nothing: the ongoing Super User lock-down&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Almost immediately, the original definition for Super User was challenged, as users of the new site attempted to come up with [more specific criteria for questions][3]. By the time [the public beta opened][4], the definition had already changed to exclude questions relating to video games or consoles. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still though, the rules for migration were simple: computer-related but not programming-related and not game-related? Move to Super User! And that's pretty much the only rules I and many other SO users bother to remember even now - although I do try to follow some of the discussion here on Meta, I wasn't really aware prior to reading this question that SU now has **an entire bullet list** of topics that *shouldn't* be asked!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Conclusion: The fresh paint on your barn wall is not my responsibility&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bad migrations *will* happen: because we aren't SU users, because we're not continually checking your FAQ for new taboos and because we're sick of fighting with people who just want answers to their computer-related questions. If you don't like it, I don't blame you - but posting a request here isn't going to accomplish much. Remember, SO was programming-specific from the very start, and *still* gets a never-ending stream of off-topic questions, many of which aren't even computer-related. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you have your work cut out for you. John's suggestion for a special &quot;migrated questions view&quot; could work... if there were enough engaged 10K users on SU to actually make use of it. As-is, I suspect such questions will continue to be the responsibility of you and your fellow moderators. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps you could use a tool that would let you [reject migrated questions][5]...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/36889/close-not-computer-related-questions-on-stackoverflow-instead-of-migrating-them-t/36905#36905&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/super-user-semi-private-beta-begins/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5778/help-define-superuser-com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/08/super-user-now-public/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/35744/allow-diamond-moderators-to-reverse-question-migrations" />
  <row Id="1391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="782" RevisionGUID="acce43fb-a5f0-48c9-b588-cf148d5484df" CreationDate="2010-01-25T10:15:26.693" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="Recently the [SuperUser FAQ][1] has been updated to be a little more strict on what questions should be asked&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is for computer enthusiasts&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and power users. If you have a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; question about …&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **and it is not about …**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - videogames or consoles&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - cellphones or mobile devices, except smartphones such as iPhone that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; interface with your computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - electronic devices or media players, except insofar as they&#xD;&#xA;&gt; interface with your computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; then you're in the right place to ask&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it would be useful if the StackOverflow users would also follow these guidelines. Thus I would request that questions that do not follow these guidelines **should be closed** on StackOverflow rather than being migrated to SuperUser and closed there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is specifically aimed at website related questions on Google services, Facebook, Twitter or Wordpress. Or iPhone/Android related questions, where they want something done on their phone rather than with their computer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Examples: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Google Reader][2] &#xD;&#xA;- [Google Docs][3]&#xD;&#xA;- [iPhone][4] &#xD;&#xA;- [Twitter][5] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or just check [this Google search for more examples...][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: could someone run a check over how many migrated questions were closed on SuperUser?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/faq&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/100019/google-reader-doesnt-update-my-feed-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/96940/is-it-possible-to-apply-formulas-and-manipulate-data-between-two-spreadsheets&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superuser.com/questions/92644/iphone-could-not-install-an-app-without-removing-all-installed&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://superuser.com/questions/92831/twitter-updates-temporarily-unavailable&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.google.be/search?hl=nl&amp;q=%22migrated%2Bfrom%2Bstackoverflow%22+site:superuser.com+%22closed+as+not+computer+related%22&amp;btnG=Zoeken&amp;meta=&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=" />
  <row Id="1392" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="782" RevisionGUID="acce43fb-a5f0-48c9-b588-cf148d5484df" CreationDate="2010-01-25T10:15:26.693" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="Close not computer related questions on StackOverflow instead of migrating them to SuperUser" />
  <row Id="1393" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="782" RevisionGUID="acce43fb-a5f0-48c9-b588-cf148d5484df" CreationDate="2010-01-25T10:15:26.693" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;migration&gt;&lt;close-reasons&gt;" />
  <row Id="1394" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="782" RevisionGUID="4510d6b6-3c50-401c-a1e3-3b3d12ea0c48" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:18.080" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/36889/close-not-computer-related-questions-on-stackoverflow-instead-of-migrating-them-t" Text="" />
  <row Id="1400" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="788" RevisionGUID="d1feef0a-afa3-4386-8176-a97a07c5fe51" CreationDate="2010-02-05T08:18:48.077" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="**We should stop rewarding unwanted behaviour**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance giving rep to duplicate questions/answers makes it worthwhile NOT to close it. If people know there are duplicates and they won't get rep for it if someone closes it as one, they might as well link to the original version instead of posting a needless answer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another issue is that people will post similar answers. Instead of deleting their duplicated version and adding their info they think is relavant to the other person's version, they will leave their version to garner some additional upvotes. Sadly, I have no idea how to reward people for not doing this, without gaming the system. Perhaps rewarding editing a little bit more?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Similar to the previous situation is when looking to answer a question and find that it has already been answered, but poorly formulated or lacking certain info. Instead of editing this answer to make it better or up-to-date, a lot of people will just leave them as they are, since there's nothing to gain.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My bottomline is: **we need better incentives for good behaviour**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1401" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="789" RevisionGUID="1b3347b4-53b9-491b-a8a1-8f69cc9d13d1" CreationDate="2010-02-05T08:41:17.350" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Cracking through the 3000 rep level to start close voting, it's really been the only fun part of visiting the site now. Blowing through the meagre 12 votes a day and watching as either Diago, Ivo or Troggy come down with their power vote to close out the dupes or off-topic questions is the only reason to even visit the site any more. Barely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first column of the users page are notorious for rarely voting to close and always, *always* making sure they get an answer in. The current top two users are the worst of the lot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dupes that are eventually closed are answered by the high rep users who also post duplicate answers knowing full well that even if the question is eventually closed, they'll stick around collecting their precious reputation points.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They don't have any problem understanding how the site works. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that they couldn't care less outside their reputation and badges.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Examples please?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [ISO on a USB drive](http://superuser.com/questions/87124/burn-iso-to-usb-flash-drive)? [Answers sound eerily familiar](http://superuser.com/questions/66948/place-a-bootable-iso-on-a-usb-drive)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Got a [problem with a drop-down list on Windows](http://superuser.com/questions/102020/edit-drop-down-desktop-list)? Enlarge [the original screenshot](http://superuser.com/questions/55731/adding-items-to-a-files-right-click-menu-in-windows-explorer). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Clearing history on Windows 7? [Two high rep users answer](http://superuser.com/questions/95964/clearing-recent-documents-list-in-windows-7) instead of casting a vote to close or a comment about [the dupe sitting in the Related list](http://superuser.com/questions/62776/clear-cache-history-in-windows-7).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Monitoring network traffic](http://superuser.com/questions/96917/how-to-look-at-inbound-bandwidth-and-outbound-bandwidth)? Split [the answers across questions](http://superuser.com/questions/68115/easy-to-use-tool-to-monitor-incoming-network-traffic)!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [7zip command line getting you down](http://superuser.com/questions/96042/7zip-cmd-line-and-unzipping)? [Post dupe questions](http://superuser.com/questions/95902/7zip-and-unzipping-from-command-line). Always gets an answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- And when a [high rep user finds out after they post a shot in the dark](http://superuser.com/questions/96743/record-streaming-audio) that there is a close vote, but all they do is comment? Don't worry, if a question is open, that brings in more eyeballs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- What if a new user finds the dupe themselves? [Post answers anyway](http://superuser.com/questions/84502/sending-many-emails)!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1402" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="790" RevisionGUID="991a3690-ae97-4b2e-aa85-75597e3ab1d9" CreationDate="2010-02-05T08:50:32.820" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="I agree with that, as mostly shown by my regular comments on such answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have indeed a bunch of people who provide good answers, and who are very active. They have an important role, because they provide a lot of quality answers. However, there is indeed &quot;too much&quot; of it, since many of them will simply answer on everything, even if they are themselves voting to close. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moderators are doing a good job, but they can't (and shouldn't have to) be behind every question. For my part, I try to encourage good behavior and comment on bad behavior, to push in the good direction. But as visible on the first example, I obviously sometimes miss correct words to make my point of view understood.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Educating high rep users is indeed the best we can do, but it won't be easy. Such a mail is already a good start, because it comes from &quot;higher&quot;. It shows that this is what the team, and moderators are suggesting as a good behavior. Other than that, I see only &quot;watching&quot; answers, and commenting under them to push to a better behavior. Unfortunately, that would be again something to be done by moderators, as they represent an authority (as opposed to a regular user like me, who is &quot;lecturing&quot; a 10k+).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also of note, I noticed that while we have some 10k+ users who are not fully respecting the rules, we have as well a growing number of 1000-3000 users who understand the rules of this site, and start posting more and more often comments explaining why such question is not adapted, or how it could be improved, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the good news is that there is indeed a base of people who are ready to help this site go on the good direction, further than only gaining rep. Let's hope that once they reach 3000, they will help closing questions without &quot;diamond&quot; power.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1403" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="791" RevisionGUID="3e6ec14b-8c37-4946-94da-d96d7860ee91" CreationDate="2010-02-05T09:00:15.463" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="This should have been done a long time ago. At this point, however, such an email would be a bit insulting for some higher-rep users; they might take it as an offense towards their work. The major problem is that the behavior we want to change today has been tolerated for way too long. This has lead to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - users not voting to close as duplicates, but rather responding over and over again,&#xD;&#xA; - few questions being closed as not a real question or not computer related (questions about websites are still answered by many, even though the FAQ says they're not SU related),&#xD;&#xA; - people giving vague answers to vague questions instead of asking for more details in comments (this leads to answers being edited a lot of times, making it a needless back and forth),&#xD;&#xA; - a complete fear of the community wiki flag. No one requests it, no one wants it, few people answer questions that are marked as such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This behavior has to be changed, but moderators need to really crack the whip on this one. Good behavior should be rewarded by having a healthier community, not by throwing badges and rep at it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thinking about it, I think the whole concept of Super User is flawed. There's no direction, there's no clear-cut niche to fill, it's a dumping ground for anything even remotely IT related. We keep adding bullet points to the FAQ in the hopes it will somehow help things out. That's why it's failing; because that's the truth, it is failing, rotting from the inside. There's been endless discussion on meta about why SU's not working. There are simply no conclusions. Jeff doesn't really care about it (he's not involved in the site or the community that much), we can't change it because we only care about our own rep, leaving it to die.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We were left with a single active moderator (Diago) for the better part of 3 months. People might claim that they were active in the background, doing unglamorous janitorial work, but that's [not true][1]. There was **one** moderator, that's it! It's unacceptable to have one person left with so much work.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using traffic as the most important metric means that we're steaming full speed ahead towards a very successful clone of Yahoo! Answers. I'd rather have a smaller, leaner, more focused Super User with users better prepared to handle the traffic that will inevitably come, than what it is today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This might come off as just a bitter rant against a whole community, but I don't want it to be that. It is my personal opinion, one that I have formed over the months I've been active in the Super User community. I am part of that community, part of both the problem and the answer. I want this site to succeed because I think the idea in it is incredible; a place where people can help and get helped out of sheer good will, not through monetary incentives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/23216/where-are-the-su-moderators" />
  <row Id="1404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="792" RevisionGUID="bc6b2254-7ab6-4b99-94b7-13ef32e46181" CreationDate="2010-02-05T10:51:38.497" Text="&lt;s&gt;Another idea: why not downvote any &quot;extra&quot; answers to duplicate, closed questions? If the only thing certain users respond to is votes, then maybe a few downvotes are in order? Or, perhaps disallow voting on closed questions entirely?&lt;/s&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After looking at the examples Diago cited, **I am not sure there is a problem.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  1. [This](http://superuser.com/questions/103961/build-quality-of-laptops/103966#103966)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; answer on a question closed as&#xD;&#xA;&gt; subjective by the community caused&#xD;&#xA;&gt; some interesting comments.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  2. [This](http://superuser.com/questions/104956/nda-and-contract-template-for-uk-closed)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; question which is not computer related&#xD;&#xA;&gt; has 1 answer. Common pattern here:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Vote to close and answer question. &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  3. [This](http://superuser.com/questions/104641/what-is-your-favourite-file-copy-manager-replacement-for-windows-closed)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; exact duplicate generated 1 high rep&#xD;&#xA;&gt; answer.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  4. [This](http://superuser.com/questions/104080/what-sorts-of-things-can-i-do-with-ssh-on-the-iphone-closed)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; question should have been closed&#xD;&#xA;&gt; outright.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  5. [This](http://superuser.com/questions/103934/free-modeling-tool-closed)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is another multiple duplicate&#xD;&#xA;&gt; question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;None of these closed questions resulted in any significant rep, and the answers did not seem harmful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The one exception is the cut-and-pasted duplicate answer on #5. In this case, I think the (answer to the) closed question *should be deleted*, primarily **because of the blatant cut-and-paste rep gain**, which means any rep gained would be removed on recalc as well." />
  <row Id="1405" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="793" RevisionGUID="7c3ba2a4-6581-4397-afc6-3a653b9a7b92" CreationDate="2010-02-05T13:34:43.847" UserDisplayName="ベレアー アダム" Text="I'm not sure there's much you can do without changing the rules to stop providing an incentive for this behavior.  And even doing that may be a bad idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your basic problem is that, unlike SO, SU has a far broader range of acceptable subject matter, while your user base is smaller (~50 users with 3k+, compare with SO where there are almost 500 users with *10k*+)... This means that the rules are more open to interpretation, and there are fewer people interested and clued enough to intepret them properly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even if you could get more of your 3k users on board with stricter interpretation,  I think you'd still have the basic problem.  The rules that work for SO do not work so well for SU.  Or, to put it another way, the problems that SO has are amplified and worsened on Superuser.  After all, if nobody were voting for inappropriate responses, then there would be no incentive for the behavior.  But this behavior *is* rewarded by the SU community, which is the root of the problem.  Having more 3k people setting a good example won't get you very far, I fear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately, I don't think you can convince your userbase to shape up this far downhill from where the site started.  I think you have to either live with the status quo, or the rules are going to have to change.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Talking about changing the rules for SU is beyond the scope of this discussion, but suffice to say that that's not exactly an attractive proposition, either.  You could end up alienating enough of your userbase to effectively kill whatever progress you've made thus far.  In fact, *any* intervention at this point carries that risk, including your proposed e-mail." />
  <row Id="1406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="794" RevisionGUID="e761edd9-ae55-4191-844d-38dc836e692f" CreationDate="2010-02-05T16:21:19.403" UserDisplayName="Ether" Text="This thread has some of the greatest discussion I've seen on meta in weeks.. awesome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a few specific recommendations, which are just a synthesis of previous feature requests that have been raised earlier, but IMHO might help to start cleaning things up on SU:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - immediately lock all closed questions&#xD;&#xA; - add the ability to flag locked questions (something we've needed for a while), so that questions can be unlocked over time by the mods and dealt with individually as needed&#xD;&#xA; - remove the reputation gained from any post that has since been closed&#xD;&#xA; - institute the change from -1/-2 to -2/-5 for downvotes (has been &quot;status-planned&quot; for many months)&#xD;&#xA; - global rep recalc&#xD;&#xA; - send Diago's letter to all users with +3000 rep, and another one (less specifically targetted towards closing questions, but still highlighting the issue of duplicates and inappropriate questions) to +200 rep users&#xD;&#xA; - put the highest rep users on notice that they are expected to uphold the highest standards on the site and they will be watched to see if they are able to help or hinder the site's goals.&#xD;&#xA; - moderators start the tiresome job of merging and deleting duplicate posts, possibly by temporarily enlisting the aid of users who have high rep on other sites but don't use SU much\*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;\*&lt;sub&gt;e.g. I have &amp;lt;200 rep on SU but 10k on SO; I do at least know a dupe when I see one and can assist with many junior janitor roles, if only helping flag posts that need attention&lt;/sub&gt;" />
  <row Id="1407" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="795" RevisionGUID="53fadf3a-09be-46c2-acdd-0c858ea6031f" CreationDate="2010-02-08T10:26:31.437" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="Answering to alex's point: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Thinking about it, I think the whole&#xD;&#xA;&gt; concept of Super User is flawed.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There's no direction, there's no&#xD;&#xA;&gt; clear-cut niche to fill, it's a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; dumping ground for anything even&#xD;&#xA;&gt; remotely IT related. We keep adding&#xD;&#xA;&gt; bullet points to the FAQ in the hopes&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it will somehow help things out.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; That's why it's failing; because&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that's the truth, it is failing,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; rotting from the inside. There's been&#xD;&#xA;&gt; endless discussion on meta about why&#xD;&#xA;&gt; SU's not working. There are simply no&#xD;&#xA;&gt; conclusions. Jeff doesn't really care&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about it (he's not involved in the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site or the community that much), we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can't change it because we only care&#xD;&#xA;&gt; about our own rep, leaving it to die.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; We were left with a single active&#xD;&#xA;&gt; moderator (Diago) for the better part&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of 3 months. People might claim that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; they were active in the background,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; doing unglamorous janitorial work, but&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that's not true. There was one&#xD;&#xA;&gt; moderator, that's it! It's&#xD;&#xA;&gt; unacceptable to have one person left&#xD;&#xA;&gt; with so much work.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Using traffic as the most important&#xD;&#xA;&gt; metric means that we're steaming full&#xD;&#xA;&gt; speed ahead towards a very successful&#xD;&#xA;&gt; clone of Yahoo! Answers. I'd rather&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have a smaller, leaner, more focused&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User with users better prepared&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to handle the traffic that will&#xD;&#xA;&gt; inevitably come, than what it is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think that the whole concept of SU is flawed. It might have been at the beginning, especially with the &quot;let's dump not programming related trash there&quot; which could have been then. But right now, there are people determined to make this site count, and this site is pretty effective. There are plenty of questions which are answered, every day, and in a high quality way. I can't even ask questions on it myself, because most of the time, a single search on it shows me the answer already.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, I agree that SU is different from other SO and SF sites, for a simple reasons, the target is wider, and wide to a range of users which doesn't really have an idea of what the site should head to, and who don't care anyway. **It is easier to have such a Q&amp;A site moderated only by its community when you cater only to programmers and sysadmins.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, if we want to keep SU clean, it will require more explicit moderation than other sites. As we target a wider audience, it is much more exposed to noise, even from its own regular users who will see their personal interest before the interest of the site. Even when there will be a lot of 3000+ users, it will still remain hard to keep it clean, because traffic will increase as well. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So yes, there should be several attempts to educate the regular users (with a mail, but also with regular comments on people's activity), but in general, Super User will require more explicit moderators**, in my opinion, to keep the site in a good direction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm aware that it might sound like giving up a bit on the community, but the facts are here, for now. When there is no moderator online, questions which should be closed remain opened. There are not enough 3000+ even for now to close them, even if they would all agree, you will rarely have 5 of them at the exact same time. So maybe for a time during which people will earn enough reputation to reach 3000, there is indeed a need for a bigger moderation, to keep the site in a clear direction." />
  <row Id="1408" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="795" RevisionGUID="53fadf3a-09be-46c2-acdd-0c858ea6031f" CreationDate="2010-02-08T10:26:31.437" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="796" RevisionGUID="fe1995dc-c616-4dcc-9653-db10aceae6c7" CreationDate="2010-02-11T06:15:47.003" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="**Current Implementation**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My current approach to the above situation as a moderator is as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - When closing a question, inform the OP via a comment that they need to review the FAQ before posting questions to check for either valid contact, and in the case of a duplicate, carefully review all duplicates before posting as they will be closed.&#xD;&#xA; - Posting a comment to the answer of 3K+ users informing them that they should review the FAQ and ensure a question meets the criteria before answering. If not they should vote.&#xD;&#xA; - Posting a comment to the answer of users under 3K+ informing them to review the FAQ before answering and flag a question for moderator attention if it does not meet the site criteria.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This slows down the closing process in my case, but will hopefully start making a dent toward resolving the above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Possible Solutions**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - High rep users continually answering questions that should be closed should be grounds for placing them in the penalty box." />
  <row Id="1410" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="796" RevisionGUID="fe1995dc-c616-4dcc-9653-db10aceae6c7" CreationDate="2010-02-11T06:15:47.003" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="797" RevisionGUID="7e1558b7-7bf6-429a-a180-f4e706db3e60" CreationDate="2010-03-13T15:02:11.933" UserDisplayName="Wil" Text="Just wanted to say my take on this after reading many of the answers here (will read them all in due course) and been told to do so a few times...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not sure if people have been directly referring to me as I am user 2/3, however after reading through some of the example links - I only saw an answer I wrote once - so I think that is a good sign.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I try to vote to close questions when I know that they are duplicates - but it is **very** hard to do so... The fact is, I do not know every question on SuperUser off by heart!... If the question says `Close (1)` I will **always** look at it and then if I agree, I will also vote.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I see a question that I know I can answer, my first instinct is to help out and answer it - not to spend five to ten minutes doing a search for a duplicate question then answering when I know it isn't a copy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also on top of this, what makes it harder is that so many questions require very similar answers - For example, I have probably copied the same spiel about dead/faulty capacitors five or more times, but the question were different enough and required it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In a [previous question][1], I made a comment and I want to say it again - `&quot;I do not want to sound bad or unappreciative for the tools - I do flag and delete/close from time to time, but at no time did I ever say I want to be a moderator - I am happy to do this when it comes up, but I am here to help people and answer questions.&quot; ` - Again, I mean no disrespect, but it is hard to say that without coming across badly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the FAQ, I did answer questions about Gmail and Wikipedia (I think it was) - but I had no idea that the FAQ was changed - It was brought to my attention and I haven't since  - personally, as internet applications become more and more important, I hope this decision is changed. ... [I just answered this][2] and I did not give it a moment of thought at the time, but right now I am thinking it is really web related... Also, [what about this one][3] from not long ago?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just have a little problem with people who have been answering here - it really feels like you are blaming the top users when I don't think that we are (well most) to blame. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, I just want to say that it is easy for many people to say these things, but as a user - it is harder than you think! I am getting on to 1,800 answers, I can not honestly remember the last few answers I have given - and if another question came up, I would probably give the same or similar answer - unless it was worded exactly the same to remind me... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I come from a forum/newsgroup background of simply answering questions - I think I have adapted and sorry if anyone thinks otherwise. In my honest opinion, this is not excluding repeat offenders but more responsibility has to be on the question asker to look for similar questions before they post...  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I was going to say, why not also display related questions on the question page... I feel like an idiot, but I just seen it is there! I will do my bit and look there in future when answering.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is much more I want to say, but I have typed and edited for the best part of two hours and this is turning in to a rant and I really do not want that. If anyone wants to address any specific points, please leave comments and I will be happy to answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;To change slightly, I wasn't sure if this deserves its own question (It is the sort of thing that I guess would of been discussed before) - but as this is about various problems on SuperUser, I thought it is best I write it here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A much bigger problem I have with Superuser is duplicate answers, I love the fact that on StackOverflow, I can get 3 duplicate answers that go in to great (different) detail. I have cancelled (or deleted) answers when I see someone else writing the exact same thing, but if I feel like I can give a detailed explanation, I think it is important to write it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;e.g. I say to use a tool along with a guide on how to use it. Whilst writing the guide, someone posts the same tool but just the name/link. I think it is ok to continue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like an official answer on this... I never really had a problem with it (I say, let the votes decide who has the best answer, and the question asker decide if he wants the quickest or detailed answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This was a real sticking point between me and another user on the site, not so much that I did it, but the fact that he/she would **always** write in comments whenever I did it... on a few times that I saw him/her do it and I would say the same, it would start with excuses and arguments... I know the arguments were annoying Diago and I felt really bad doing it...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It got to the point where I felt like leaving - in the end, I significantly cut down my time on the site... That user is now gone (after having similar arguments with other users as well), but I would still like to get other peoples opinions on this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;Edit-&#xD;&#xA;One theme I have seen many people saying is that people are doing this sort of thing just for reputation - I would like to say again, I come from forums/newsgroups and a selfless background, I would be here if there was no reputation, it is simply a very nice addition... however, to be honest, I feel rather depressed when I see the large number and then think how much work I could of got done!... but I am greatful for the breaks between calls/emails!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Now up to about 4 hours and by far, my longest answer on all the sites!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39267/account-suspension-for-answering-questions-well/39297#39297&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/118111/openid-compromised/118112#118112&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/119500/alternative-to-web-of-trust" />
  <row Id="1412" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="797" RevisionGUID="7e1558b7-7bf6-429a-a180-f4e706db3e60" CreationDate="2010-03-13T15:02:11.933" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1413" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="787" RevisionGUID="15c2fc1d-4bc0-4abf-9596-0c80cfc15bdf" CreationDate="2010-02-05T07:55:15.560" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="With about 1 million views a month at the moment, Super User is turning out to be successful, however due to the general audience the concept of a Q&amp;A vs. a forum is still something we need to deal with every day. Part of the problem is a few of the high reputation users do not understand Super User, and one idea to help improve this is to send an e-mail to all users with 3K+ reputation with the goal of explaining how Super User works, and the role these users play on the site. The content of the mail would be something along the lines of the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Dear Super User,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We would like to thank you for your contribution to the Super User website, and appreciate the time and energy you have put into being part of the site. As a high reputation user, your role on the site is &lt;strike&gt;slightly&lt;/strike&gt; more than just answering questions, and we would like to ask your help with the following:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Due to the larger audience Super User caters to, and the lack of understanding about the site, we would like to ask that you are vigilant with closing duplicate questions, and identifying questions that do not meet the criteria listed at http://superuser.com/faq. Unfortunately, there are currently a lot of these questions being answered rather than closed, which makes it hard to control the level and quality of the content on the site. Please keep in mind that the goal of Super User is to be a canonical source of information, linked by Google, with a single up-to-date question providing the most up-to-date answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; kind regards,  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User Team and Moderators&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are a few of the top users constantly answering these questions instead of closing them, and this has actually created friction, highlighted by various comments on answers. The problem is that it reflects negatively on the site as well as causing these users to stay away or even needing the diamond moderators to intervene. Honestly, the diamond moderators are just that, moderators, not psychologists. **As pointed out by the answers, some of the existing regulars have already started to leave Super User because of this.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead however of penalising users and potentially losing valuable members, there needs to be some way to encourage more positive interaction. However this can't be done unless these users are made more aware of the goals and functionality of the site, instead of it being treated as another forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Thanks to Jeff**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; So the real implied question is, how much direct coaching should be/is appropriate for the 10K+ users on a trilogy site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; And how can we do indirect coaching, that is, make the software nudge them to do the right things and nudge them away from the wrong things?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some more recent examples of where these issues occur:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [This](http://superuser.com/questions/103961/build-quality-of-laptops/103966#103966) answer on a question closed as subjective by the community caused some interesting comments.&#xD;&#xA; 2. [This](http://superuser.com/questions/104956/nda-and-contract-template-for-uk-closed) question which is not computer related has 1 answer. Common pattern here: Vote to close and answer question. &#xD;&#xA; 3. [This](http://superuser.com/questions/104641/what-is-your-favourite-file-copy-manager-replacement-for-windows-closed) exact duplicate generated 1 high rep answer.&#xD;&#xA; 4. [This](http://superuser.com/questions/104080/what-sorts-of-things-can-i-do-with-ssh-on-the-iphone-closed) question should have been closed outright.&#xD;&#xA; 5. [This](http://superuser.com/questions/103934/free-modeling-tool-closed) is another multiple duplicate question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Some more samples courtesy of [random](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/38391/high-reputation-users-having-trouble-understanding-super-user/38394#38394) with comments**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;- [ISO on a USB drive](http://superuser.com/questions/87124/burn-iso-to-usb-flash-drive)? [Answers sound eerily familiar](http://superuser.com/questions/66948/place-a-bootable-iso-on-a-usb-drive)?&#xD;&#xA;- Got a [problem with a drop-down list on Windows](http://superuser.com/questions/102020/edit-drop-down-desktop-list)? Enlarge [the original screenshot](http://superuser.com/questions/55731/adding-items-to-a-files-right-click-menu-in-windows-explorer). &#xD;&#xA;- Clearing history on Windows 7? [Two high rep users answer](http://superuser.com/questions/95964/clearing-recent-documents-list-in-windows-7) instead of casting a vote to close or a comment about [the dupe sitting in the Related list](http://superuser.com/questions/62776/clear-cache-history-in-windows-7).&#xD;&#xA;- [Monitoring network traffic](http://superuser.com/questions/96917/how-to-look-at-inbound-bandwidth-and-outbound-bandwidth)? Split [the answers across questions](http://superuser.com/questions/68115/easy-to-use-tool-to-monitor-incoming-network-traffic)!&#xD;&#xA;- [7zip command line getting you down](http://superuser.com/questions/96042/7zip-cmd-line-and-unzipping)? [Post dupe questions](http://superuser.com/questions/95902/7zip-and-unzipping-from-command-line). Always gets an answer.&#xD;&#xA;- And when a [high rep user finds out after they post a shot in the dark](http://superuser.com/questions/96743/record-streaming-audio) that there is a close vote, but all they do is comment? Don't worry, if a question is open, that brings in more eyeballs.&#xD;&#xA;- What if a new user finds the dupe themselves? [Post answers anyway](http://superuser.com/questions/84502/sending-many-emails)!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Personal Note**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do not agree with the stance &quot;I am going to answer and vote to close just in case it stays open&quot;, I also do not agree that closed questions should allow accepted answers or voting. However apart from putting the high rep users in the penalty box, which is a negative solution, I would rather find a positive way to encourage correct behaviour.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, the two items I would really like to see changed on Super User are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Diamond moderators having to intervene and close every question.&#xD;&#xA; 2. Users staying away because of the actions of high reputation users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Summary**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there currently any way apart from the suggestions already made in some very good answers on how to deal with this correctly? Is this really a problem? Currently there seems to be strong support for some sort of intervention, however is there also strong support for not doing anything?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Some Implemented Solutions**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - SVN Revision 6276: Introduced expanded closed boxes with more detailed descriptions for closing reasons, including detailed descriptions of the specific close reason once the question is closed." />
  <row Id="1414" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="787" RevisionGUID="15c2fc1d-4bc0-4abf-9596-0c80cfc15bdf" CreationDate="2010-02-05T07:55:15.560" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="High reputation users having trouble understanding Super User?" />
  <row Id="1415" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="787" RevisionGUID="15c2fc1d-4bc0-4abf-9596-0c80cfc15bdf" CreationDate="2010-02-05T07:55:15.560" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;10k&gt;" />
  <row Id="1416" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="787" RevisionGUID="15c2fc1d-4bc0-4abf-9596-0c80cfc15bdf" CreationDate="2010-02-05T07:55:15.560" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1417" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="787" RevisionGUID="5ea72358-7524-4138-82bd-49af236029f8" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:40.790" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/38391/high-reputation-users-having-trouble-understanding-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1418" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="799" RevisionGUID="88444d6d-e634-46fc-834d-efe5e41dbc69" CreationDate="2010-02-05T22:21:23.857" UserDisplayName="heavyd" Text="Close them as &quot;No longer relevant&quot;" />
  <row Id="1419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="800" RevisionGUID="6f6a280c-c575-4e49-b29e-61ef470af6ba" CreationDate="2010-02-05T22:27:08.740" UserDisplayName="Zypher" Text="I say keep them. They may be outdated to _you_ in 6 months, but i promise you someone 2, 3, 4 or more years down the line will have picked up hardware xyz off ebay or still has it running. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hardware has a surprising ability to stick around for years and years, even after most people have moved on." />
  <row Id="1420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="801" RevisionGUID="32f4b8ab-a2fa-4c62-bc30-056be9ad8f65" CreationDate="2010-02-05T22:41:24.043" UserDisplayName="perbert" Text="&gt;I like Super User, often I have only to write the title of my question on the &quot;Ask Question&quot; page and the answer shows up in the &quot;Related Questions&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Thus I want to keep it great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's great. That's the attitude that makes these sites great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Computer hardware questions is always getting outdated and doubly so when price is discussed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think that price should be discussed on SU, as that is too localized for an international audience these sites have.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;This question got closed as a dupe, but I agree with one of the comments that a dupe from six moths ago is not relevant from a computer-hardware/price question today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think that [Is it still cheaper to build your own PC?][1] is a bit more generic. In the last 15 years [Roalt's][2] and [TheTXI's][3] answers it has been true, and it is likely to continue to be true for some time (IMHO). Also, it's a community wiki question, so anybody can jump in and update it anytime.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;In my opinion it should probably have been allowed or perhaps closed as To Localized instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd have closed as too localized the original, the second one is a tad more generic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;But here is my main question:&#xD;&#xA;What should we do about old hardware questions? A search about best/$ *Frobnac* is bound to be irrelevant afer six months (or even earlier)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then close as no longer relevant in six months, update it if you have the edit powers, or/and ask it again pointing to the outdated question, letting the community decide the appropriate course of action.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/1661/is-it-still-cheaper-to-build-your-own-pc&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/1661/is-it-still-cheaper-to-build-your-own-pc/1687#1687&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/1661/is-it-still-cheaper-to-build-your-own-pc/1684#1684" />
  <row Id="1421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="802" RevisionGUID="d9505451-087e-4ad2-bce2-20145e7b130b" CreationDate="2010-02-06T00:04:08.883" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="Ideally speaking, all questions should remain live and constantly updated and kept relevant through edits and new submissions. **But that's not reality.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Many technology questions have a limited lifetime. It is simply unlikely that new answers will be add and voted up while older, out-dated answers will be voted down and pushed out of relevance. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*[As a side note, this is the very reason we should not encourage localized &quot;what's the best price/technology/etc&quot; questions unless they are posed in the context of an EXTREMELY specific situation.]*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a tough question and one that **will plague Super User sooner than Stack Overflow or Server Fault**. I think the best near-term solution is to at least attempt to close older questions as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**[closed -- no longer relevant]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They will remain in the system for archival value and users who answered the questions will not lose the reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long term...? That's another discussion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="803" RevisionGUID="da14d998-28c5-4708-b303-a462beba706a" CreationDate="2010-02-06T01:15:48.703" UserDisplayName="chris" Text="Another random opinion, since this doesn't just apply to old hardware, but can apply to software too:  rather than close, how about an [archive] tag - a special tag that wouldn't show up in any searches unless it was explicitly included.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1423" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="798" RevisionGUID="db43b43f-c230-4b9b-9ded-cf5817f02cd1" CreationDate="2010-02-05T22:19:45.857" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="I like Super User, often I have only to write the title of my question on the &quot;Ask Question&quot; page and the answer shows up in the &quot;Related Questions&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus I want to keep it great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Computer hardware questions is always getting outdated and doubly so when price is discussed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This [question][1] got closed as a dupe, but I agree with one of the comments that a dupe from six moths ago is not relevant from a computer-hardware/price question today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion it should probably have been allowed or perhaps closed as To Localized instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**But here is my main question**  &#xD;&#xA;What should we do about old hardware questions? A search about best/$ *Frobnac* is bound to be irrelevant afer six months (or even earlier)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/105221/alienware-worth-the-money-suggestions-for-a-build-up-gaming-computer-closed" />
  <row Id="1424" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="798" RevisionGUID="db43b43f-c230-4b9b-9ded-cf5817f02cd1" CreationDate="2010-02-05T22:19:45.857" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="What to do about permanently outdated questions/answers on SU" />
  <row Id="1425" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="798" RevisionGUID="db43b43f-c230-4b9b-9ded-cf5817f02cd1" CreationDate="2010-02-05T22:19:45.857" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="1426" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="798" RevisionGUID="c6400b06-3a59-4859-9913-4df56cb10a9e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:44.660" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/38491/what-to-do-about-permanently-outdated-questions-answers-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1427" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="805" RevisionGUID="f1a0cd48-dae0-4b11-a5d6-0b4a3fc75981" CreationDate="2010-02-12T02:45:38.860" Text="I periodically see issues with even Google Analytics, but they tend to be intermittent in nature." />
  <row Id="1428" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="804" RevisionGUID="6591c4c0-f4dc-4c51-b6ec-588b43738226" CreationDate="2010-02-11T22:26:55.477" UserDisplayName="Wil" Text="I have noticed this for the past few days, Many SuperUser.com pages simply do not finish loading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I refreshed the page ten times, once it was stuck on &quot;Waiting for www.gravitar.com...&quot;, but I cannot recreate that, all the other times it says &quot;Transferring data from pixel.quantserve.com...&quot; and hangs on that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just tried it at my neighbours house and on another computer and got the same result, but only in Firefox, IE seems to load just fine (or at least, doesn't show that it is waiting for/loading anything else).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Nothing has changed here and I was wondering if anyone else is getting similar results?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebv8mr.jpg" />
  <row Id="1429" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="804" RevisionGUID="6591c4c0-f4dc-4c51-b6ec-588b43738226" CreationDate="2010-02-11T22:26:55.477" UserDisplayName="Wil" Text="Superuser.com bug with pixel.quantserve.com?" />
  <row Id="1430" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="804" RevisionGUID="6591c4c0-f4dc-4c51-b6ec-588b43738226" CreationDate="2010-02-11T22:26:55.477" UserDisplayName="Wil" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;delays&gt;" />
  <row Id="1431" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="804" RevisionGUID="d7ebd2c1-584b-4210-8829-06011284a127" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:45.860" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39143/superuser-com-bug-with-pixel-quantserve-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="1432" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="807" RevisionGUID="d9e4fba7-cb46-4021-b4fd-55fb33011955" CreationDate="2010-02-12T20:01:26.380" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="Done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree with you that is should be **macbook-pro** as it follows the same convention as **macbook-air** and so forth.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For the unibody ones, I went through and modified them one by one as they each dealt with different issues and there was not many of them. One of them was specific to unibody models and HDD upgrades. " />
  <row Id="1433" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="806" RevisionGUID="dd872bb8-4627-49f6-a41f-13ec043ba7f5" CreationDate="2010-02-12T19:53:11.183" UserDisplayName="Studer" Text="On Superuser, there are two tags for the same subject : &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ***macbookpro***, with 122 hits&#xD;&#xA; - ***macbook-pro***, with 3 hits&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That would be nice is someone could merge these two tags to ***macbook-pro*** (with a hyphen) I suggest, because you can already find the tag ***macbook-air*** (with a hyphen) and because you write *MacBook Pro* in two separate words.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way the tag ***macbook-unibody*** is only used 4 times, 2 times unnecessarily.&#xD;&#xA;Moreover, this tag is ambiguous, because there are *MacBook unibody* and *MacBook Pro unibody*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if we should delete this tag or merge it with macbook or macbook-pro, but at the moment it's not useful." />
  <row Id="1434" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="806" RevisionGUID="dd872bb8-4627-49f6-a41f-13ec043ba7f5" CreationDate="2010-02-12T19:53:11.183" UserDisplayName="Studer" Text="Merging macbook* tags on SU" />
  <row Id="1435" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="806" RevisionGUID="dd872bb8-4627-49f6-a41f-13ec043ba7f5" CreationDate="2010-02-12T19:53:11.183" UserDisplayName="Studer" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1436" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="806" RevisionGUID="2c7cf154-3f94-4ecf-9cae-195db9298d9d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:46.510" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39274/merging-macbook-tags-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1437" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="809" RevisionGUID="368cebea-c211-4d40-9d25-c9231ea79fb5" CreationDate="2010-02-13T05:12:46.117" UserDisplayName="random" Text="You'd be an optimist to think that users on SO [knew what they were doing][1] when migrating questions to Super User. [That's not the case][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When the users with close vote level on SO can't work out what should and should not go on SU, why do you think they would know what should and shouldn't stick around on SU if they've not proven themselves in the mire and muck that is SU?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem lies with the [high rep users not wanting][3] to help improve the site and instead focus solely on improving their rep.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hey man, voting to close questions on Super User is the only fun to be had. And that's a privilege earned through having your mind blown at the absolute drivel and your resolve shattered at the asylum that is spending time on that site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/26305/why-dont-stack-overflow-users-still-know-how-to-close-questions-appropriately  &quot;no, not really&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/36889/close-not-computer-related-questions-on-stackoverflow &quot;death bong all along&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/38391/high-reputation-users-having-trouble-understanding-super-user/38394#38394 &quot;SU rep is farmville gold!&quot;" />
  <row Id="1438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="810" RevisionGUID="82bb6ef3-0955-4fcb-8da0-bc720aa737a7" CreationDate="2010-02-13T05:28:08.983" Text="If that's the case -- we want to redistribute rep to more avid users who are willing to help -- then interested SU users should be setting up questions with bounties of 550.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While this is a little bit like gaming the system, it is for a good cause, and as long as the questions and answers are valid, I don't really have a problem with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll start:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/82036/recovering-a-lost-website-with-no-backup&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I awarded to our pal George Stocker:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/users/1174/george-stocker&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;bam, 934 rep!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Remember, it &quot;only&quot; takes 2k rep to edit anything, so a single 550 rep bounty gets you more than 1/4 of the way there. In particular, this is very safe for moderators since the extra rep doesn't do much for them in terms of abilities anyway.)" />
  <row Id="1439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="811" RevisionGUID="51721207-598a-4439-8b1a-09b2165f947d" CreationDate="2010-02-13T05:29:15.660" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="I don't think this is a good idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps another level of moderatorship could/should be implemented.  Something lower than Diamonds -- Clubs maybe?  How does &quot;State of the Union ♣&quot; sound?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As @random points out, a high rep on SO/SF doesn't necessarily mean a user knows enough about SU to close properly.  (And yes, a high rep on SU doesn't necessarily mean a user knows enough -- but some of us are making an effort to improve.)  It's another community -- tags and close reasons don't immediately translate, and you have to make the effort to learn the ropes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SU could use more junior janitors to do editing and retagging, and some form of mini-moderatorship could provide the manpower.  I *don't* think 6k+ SO/SF/MSO users should automatically get editing privileges on SU.  But I don't have anything against someone who really wants to help the site -- if they can convince the Diamond mods they should have *editing privs*, I'd support them as a Club mod.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But not close votes.  They need to work for those.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="812" RevisionGUID="2b5bb51d-676c-4d6d-a595-e6df4e852dab" CreationDate="2010-06-30T22:04:49.743" UserDisplayName="Jon Seigel" Text="Granting vote-to-close powers is too much without being familiar with the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I really like [Quack's idea][2], although over time, many of the users on a site would end up having these privileges, so I'm not sure giving them a special symbol beside there name is necessarily a good idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think something like the following would do the trick: If you have 10k *total* rep on the Trilogy sites (including Meta), you are automatically granted 2k-level abilities on all the other sites. You would have to get to 3k actual rep before being granted vote-to-close -- this would allow for the needed experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It really pains me that a lot of the [retagging requests for ServerFault][3] in particular tend to not get done because so few people (a) have 500 rep on that site, (b) pay attention to Meta, and (c) are interested in doing the work that needs doing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are many of us that are more than willing to put in some grunt work doing retagging or basic editing. To do most of the retagging requests, we don't even need subject knowledge -- it helps, certainly -- but most of it is simply having the ability to make those edits. If there's something in there that we don't know anything about, we leave it alone. Simple.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39345/allow-so-sf-junior-janitors-equivalent-powers-on-su/39348#39348&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39345/allow-so-sf-junior-janitors-equivalent-powers-on-su/39349#39349&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/retag-request%20serverfault%20-status-completed" />
  <row Id="1441" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="813" RevisionGUID="33aede64-b206-480c-92cc-56d57f1cb535" CreationDate="2010-07-01T02:40:02.577" UserDisplayName="alexanderpas" Text="I've already seen some [good solutions](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39345/allow-so-sf-junior-janitors-equivalent-powers-on-su/55511#55511) in here, but I think the actual solution should even be stricter!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have 10k rep on 3 or more StackExchange (including the Trilogy) sites (and at least 2 of them are non-Meta), you are automatically granted 2K-level (or similar) abilities on all the other sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This'll ensure only those very familiar with the system will get the needed tools to &quot;save&quot; a site in a &quot;less optimal&quot; state." />
  <row Id="1442" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="808" RevisionGUID="bd9f6f0a-55b4-4a5c-ad4d-bbc1342c47bb" CreationDate="2010-02-13T04:54:38.743" UserDisplayName="Dr. Gonzo" Text="This is going to sound like a dupe. So let's get it out of the way right now: I don't consider this a true dupe, in that I'm proposing a highly specialized application of cross-site rep promotion. (If you read nothing else, before slamming that close button with all the fury you can muster, at *least* read the last two paragraphs. You can skip to there if you want, but read those to see why this is different than the dupes you're about to go searching out.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems there [may be][1] an [issue][2] on Super User regarding question quality, content, applicability and duplication. This is definitely a problem on SO as well, but we have many users who are interested in performing the junior janitor role -- myself included. (Indeed, I find it to be the most interesting contribution I can make these days. The questions usually get answered before I get there, so I &quot;take&quot; from SO by learning from it; I feel I can only &quot;give back&quot; by cleaning up. &amp;lt;g&amp;gt;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't go Super User often. Partially this is because most of the questions that I actually find interesting there are on topics I'm not qualified to answer -- such as Linux. The questions I am qualified to answer, I do, and some get upvoted, many don't, and in the end I don't care too much. I readily admit that I've not put forth the effort to break into the junior janitor level there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But every time -- **every time** -- I go to Super User, I see at least one question on the list that intrigues me, and I click through to read the whole question, and I instinctively go for the &quot;edit&quot; button. The &quot;edit&quot; button that isn't there because my rep on SU is (and rightfully so) in the [1300s][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not the only one with this problem. :) Although I can't find the post now to save my life, at least one other Meta regular mentioned going through that same set of motions instinctively. Indeed, as time has gone on in the Trilogy, I find that -- outside Meta -- the vast majority of the work I find interesting and fun *is* junior janitoring, and I'd like to contribute that to SU, where it seems desperately needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not proposing the &quot;1 rep to rule them all&quot; stuff we've read a dozen times. I'm proposing a single special case. I think it's very fair to say that your higher-rep Stack Overflow and Server Fault users are *more* than qualified to junior janitor Super User -- it is, by its very nature, a subset of our existing skillsets. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus, I'm proposing that if someone has attained a high-enough rep (say twice the closure threshold -- 6,000) on either Stack Overflow or Server Fault, and *is interested,* he/she be &quot;promoted&quot; to a junior janitor on SU strictly for the purpose of editing and casting close/reopen votes. (Note that &quot;is interested&quot; doesn't have to be programmatically determined. You can simply grant all 6,000+ Stack Overflow or Server Fault users the &quot;edit&quot; and &quot;close&quot;/&quot;reopen&quot; buttons, and if they choose to exercise them, they will.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39267/account-suspension-for-answering-questions-well&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/38391/high-reputation-users-having-trouble-understanding-super-user&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/users/1086/john-rudy" />
  <row Id="1443" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="808" RevisionGUID="bd9f6f0a-55b4-4a5c-ad4d-bbc1342c47bb" CreationDate="2010-02-13T04:54:38.743" UserDisplayName="Dr. Gonzo" Text="Allow SO/SF junior janitors equivalent powers on SU" />
  <row Id="1444" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="808" RevisionGUID="bd9f6f0a-55b4-4a5c-ad4d-bbc1342c47bb" CreationDate="2010-02-13T04:54:38.743" UserDisplayName="Dr. Gonzo" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;" />
  <row Id="1445" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="808" RevisionGUID="20ffe0af-9904-4015-b81b-4e3cb3e185a2" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:46.657" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39345/allow-so-sf-junior-janitors-equivalent-powers-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="815" RevisionGUID="32f30674-2c6c-45da-8b97-bb2d24f4dcdb" CreationDate="2010-02-15T16:58:35.773" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="I quite agree with that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before the [FAQ was updated][1], there were two close reasons (in this scope): **not computer related** and **videogame related** (games being the only &quot;exception&quot; then).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After this update adding more exceptions, and the refactoring of the close reasons to take away the ones which were redundant, SU was left with only &quot;not computer related&quot;, for this kind of questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree that indeed, since this is supposed to be the only one remaining about such &quot;out of scope&quot; questions, it should probably be renamed as such. Because indeed, for now, there is easily a confusion, leading to the usual comments: &quot;how come my iPhone is not a computer?&quot;, &quot;how come GMail is not software?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here is a proposition of a new close reason, with its description:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;h2&gt;closed as not Super User&#xD;&#xA;&gt; related by Diago (*just an example*)&lt;/h2&gt; Questions on Super User&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are expected to generally relate to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computer software or computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in some way, within the scope defined in the [FAQ][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other proposition, by fretje:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;h2&gt;closed as off-topic by Diago (*just an example*)&lt;/h2&gt; Questions on Super User&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are expected to generally relate to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computer software or computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in some way, within the scope defined in the [FAQ][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyone feel free to improve it by editing it directly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/35733/update-the-superuser-faq&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/faq" />
  <row Id="1447" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="815" RevisionGUID="32f30674-2c6c-45da-8b97-bb2d24f4dcdb" CreationDate="2010-02-15T16:58:35.773" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1448" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="816" RevisionGUID="db7021e7-2465-4439-8dc0-40aefe4bfd06" CreationDate="2010-02-15T17:18:46.460" UserDisplayName="Pollyanna" Text="&gt; Websites related questions (Gmail, Facebook, Twitter ...) often get closed on that basis. I just checked on Wikipedia - what they are is certanly software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just because you use a car to get to the store does not mean a Walmart question should be posted on an automobile website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;GMail is not computer related.  They use computers to run the service.  You use a computer to use the service.  But GMail usage questions in and of themselves are not *computer* questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are not software either - they are *services*." />
  <row Id="1449" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="814" RevisionGUID="14b2f6ae-cf47-4e89-93af-eaca7af69eb7" CreationDate="2010-02-15T16:46:45.560" UserDisplayName="ldigas" Text="This is a purely language issue, but imho, it deserves some thought.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know how things currently stand on Stack Overflow and Server Fault, but on Super User questions often get closed as *&lt;b&gt;non computer related&lt;/b&gt;*, for which the description stands, and I quote:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Questions on Super User are expected to generally relate to computer software or computer hardware in some way. This question is very far afield from software or hardware.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, the FAQ clearly states that SU is not about:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- videogames or consoles  &#xD;&#xA;- websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress  &#xD;&#xA;- cellphones or mobile devices, except smartphones such as iPhone that interface with your computer  &#xD;&#xA;- electronic devices or media players, except insofar as they interface with your computer  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;but it is about:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- computer hardware  &#xD;&#xA;- computer software  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Websites related questions (Gmail, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) often get closed on that basis. I just checked on Wikipedia - what they are is certanly software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I wouldn't mind a simple statement saying, &quot;Closed for not being in the scope of this site&quot;, but closing them as not being software or hardware related, or worse, not being computer related is plain silly. **Should that reason for closing be renamed to something more sensible ?**" />
  <row Id="1450" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="814" RevisionGUID="14b2f6ae-cf47-4e89-93af-eaca7af69eb7" CreationDate="2010-02-15T16:46:45.560" UserDisplayName="ldigas" Text="Terminology issue of computer related questions" />
  <row Id="1451" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="814" RevisionGUID="14b2f6ae-cf47-4e89-93af-eaca7af69eb7" CreationDate="2010-02-15T16:46:45.560" UserDisplayName="ldigas" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;terminology&gt;" />
  <row Id="1452" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="814" RevisionGUID="6575f42c-1dff-47ce-837c-b6accc97822f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:47.897" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39523/terminology-issue-of-computer-related-questions" Text="" />
  <row Id="1453" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="818" RevisionGUID="143450c3-5d76-4142-9b10-2d35b6e92e72" CreationDate="2010-02-16T01:28:18.010" UserDisplayName="Juan Manuel" Text="The font is different, are you running a GreaseMonkey script?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It obviously [a problem at your end][1], as there are thousands of people using that browser and no one is having that problem, or it would've been reported by now&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2008/03/the-first-rule-of-programming-its-always-your-fault.html" />
  <row Id="1454" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="817" RevisionGUID="37348674-77c1-4b08-a36b-3e3d0e31d1f5" CreationDate="2010-02-16T01:22:17.363" UserDisplayName="casualcoder" Text="This cannot be just my browser, Firefox 3.6, so what is causing it?  When I click to add a comment, the comment box (just after the first comment seen in the screenshot) extends beyond the center column into the text box on the right hand side.  It is frustrating to add a simple comment because there is no way to click the Add Comment button (the piece visible through the text cannot be clicked on successfully).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Screenshot][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i46.tinypic.com/2eqfgk4.png" />
  <row Id="1455" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="817" RevisionGUID="37348674-77c1-4b08-a36b-3e3d0e31d1f5" CreationDate="2010-02-16T01:22:17.363" UserDisplayName="casualcoder" Text="Why is the comments box obscured by right hand text box?" />
  <row Id="1456" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="817" RevisionGUID="37348674-77c1-4b08-a36b-3e3d0e31d1f5" CreationDate="2010-02-16T01:22:17.363" UserDisplayName="casualcoder" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;layout&gt;" />
  <row Id="1457" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="817" RevisionGUID="f0437335-dcf5-4135-b50a-826f2f39a329" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:48.640" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39570/why-is-the-comments-box-obscured-by-right-hand-text-box" Text="" />
  <row Id="1458" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="820" RevisionGUID="24bf0738-0963-4bac-8b30-c6d2a3926d02" CreationDate="2010-02-16T09:03:09.530" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="I would say &quot;like for smartphone questions&quot;: If it involves a computer, this concerns Super User.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Accessories like memory cards are even less ambiguous in my opinion, because you can't really do something with your memory card alone. Smartphones are often on a grey area because they more or less &quot;work like small computers on their own&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can find more appropriate places for a smartphone question, you can imagine something specific to it. There are StackExchange sites specialized about them. I can't, however, imagine of another place to ask questions about computer accessories than Super User. They fall under the &quot;computer hardware&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree however that memory cards could be in a grey area, as you can use them specifically with something else. But simply, if your question is generic about them, and would concern computers as well, then it is ok on SU." />
  <row Id="1459" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="819" RevisionGUID="461f0381-fc15-4e34-ab9b-39d7fb351ad3" CreationDate="2010-02-16T04:31:31.627" UserDisplayName="Isaac Waller" Text="Are questions about accessories (specifically, MicroSD cards) that may or may not be used with a computer allowed on SuperUser? &lt;!-- Even more out of SuperUser's target area, are questions about shopping for MicroSD cards (&quot;Is (blank) brand good quality?&quot;) allowed? --&gt;" />
  <row Id="1460" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="819" RevisionGUID="461f0381-fc15-4e34-ab9b-39d7fb351ad3" CreationDate="2010-02-16T04:31:31.627" UserDisplayName="Isaac Waller" Text="Could-be-computer accessories on SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="1461" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="819" RevisionGUID="461f0381-fc15-4e34-ab9b-39d7fb351ad3" CreationDate="2010-02-16T04:31:31.627" UserDisplayName="Isaac Waller" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="1462" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="819" RevisionGUID="7b15615d-8ac5-4b3d-b39f-2eb57ce1363b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:49.000" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39579/could-be-computer-accessories-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1463" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="822" RevisionGUID="dec1823d-3c61-4980-bd13-3a255a0ea7ad" CreationDate="2010-02-16T17:15:21.693" UserDisplayName="Dr. Gonzo" Text="This isn't &quot;new,&quot; per se -- it's been the case for a long time. (Later on I'll go dig up the earliest reference I've seen to web sites not being covered by SU.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I see your argument. After all, I made essentially the same argument about the iPad. Splitting hairs over the definition of a computer, or of software, is going to cause friction, especially as everything converges in this modern era of computing. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, from the team's perspective, it's pretty apparent that they're trying to gear SU towards &quot;locally-run&quot; software and &quot;traditional form-factor&quot; (laptop or keyboard/monitor/case factor) computers. Based on how they're trying to steer the community, they're in the right to shut that down -- as they are when they close iPad questions." />
  <row Id="1464" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="823" RevisionGUID="9b0cd8e7-739a-4a04-8e74-38794c9917a8" CreationDate="2010-02-16T17:25:21.053" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="I definitely think that questions about web apps are off-topic on Super User.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I agree with you that those web apps are getting more and more important. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe it's time to extend the trilogy with yet another Q&amp;A site specifically aimed at web apps? That way those off-topic question which are already on Super User could be migrated in stead of just closed (and maybe deleted in the future). I think this would really be the best option as a lot of those questions and answers have actual value!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OTOH, if Jeff and Joel don't want to consider that, there's nobody stopping you (or anybody else) to start your own wep app centric Q&amp;A site using the [StackExchange][1] platform.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just checked the [List of StackExchange Sites][2], and there doesn't seem to be something like that yet. I think there is potential there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4/list-of-stackexchange-sites" />
  <row Id="1465" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="824" RevisionGUID="3e315a4c-cd3e-459a-a883-182089ad706b" CreationDate="2010-02-18T18:36:15.773" UserDisplayName="Evan Carroll" Text="I think most people want a term to describe:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* single user applications, including configuration of (Excel, Powerpoint)&#xD;&#xA;* multi-user applications where the administration or configuration is not in question (Google Apps, Facebook)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This seems perfectly fine, because it matches quite well a mental grouping of Kids, Grandmas, and Software Enthusiast, and Businessmen. These are all subsets of `Users` that we have no reason to assume any technical knowledge of.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find this to be the least awkward way to distinguish what *I would like SU to be*. However, I can see splitting off *entertainment software* out of necessity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd take it one step further and say stuff that comes in a box (hardware) probably doesn't belong on the site all. Price-hunting on discount net-books seems totally uninteresting and out of place." />
  <row Id="1466" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="825" RevisionGUID="34d08b93-5048-43f7-bf94-99476dd68c54" CreationDate="2010-02-18T22:03:18.200" UserDisplayName="Peter Turner" Text="I think that if mods on Super User are going to be extremely aggressive about this, then Super User is not going to be the first place I go to ask any reasonable question.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I believe that if someone is willing to answer your question, it should be legit. If they want to move it to another website, that's OK too, as long as you get an answer and don't have to deal with legal positivism. " />
  <row Id="1467" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="826" RevisionGUID="4b32344c-c31c-46e3-8b0f-a4a5e7c62a75" CreationDate="2010-02-19T00:17:51.457" UserDisplayName="Arkaaito" Text="I think this is a more general policy across the SO family of sites (even if it's not official on any except SuperUser).  I had a community wiki question closed on StackOverflow because it dealt [specifically with website UI][1] and asked for examples that web developers ought to learn from (in the vein of the book Beautiful Code).  Yet the same question specifically for application UI is perfectly acceptable.  (And probably necessary, since the [general thread][2] on this has a lot of websites.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Right now web applications are in that &quot;awkward phase&quot; - they're not accepted as &quot;real programs&quot; by a lot of smart people, programmers and non-programmers alike.  Most people now in the field are probably too young to remember it, but personal computers went through the same phase.  (&quot;Real programs&quot; ran on mainframes and, later, minicomputers - someone who specialized in microcomputer programming was... well, no one was sure what, but certainly not a programmer.)  I don't think the policy will change until this does.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2167379/beautiful-web-ui-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/238180/what-is-the-best-ui-youve-ever-used" />
  <row Id="1468" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="827" RevisionGUID="568e3a7e-f582-4b7d-a025-4095b472d63f" CreationDate="2010-02-19T09:23:25.507" UserDisplayName="torpesco" Text="The &quot;closed as not computer related&quot; text should really be changed to reference the appropriate section of the policy.  I logged in to SU for the first time today and saw a couple things closed with that message, and my first thought was &quot;WTF?&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Having read this discussion, I can understand why they were closed, but that message has got to be infuriating for people.  WordPress/Gmail/whatever are not computer-related?  Good luck using them without one." />
  <row Id="1469" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="828" RevisionGUID="848af445-432f-4a36-b256-b2923176fa30" CreationDate="2010-02-19T14:09:43.337" UserDisplayName="Peter Turner" Text="Web Apps with offline modes (like those enabled by Google Gears) should be allowed to be asked on SuperUser because they have code that executes from your PC and perform the same functions as other offline programs.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, RESTful applications that interact with websites should be allowed. I'd be annoyed if anyone closed a question related to TweetDeck, but not surprised if someone closed a question related to changing your picture on Twitter." />
  <row Id="1470" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="829" RevisionGUID="88b91543-33f3-4479-944f-65ce6438d507" CreationDate="2010-02-19T20:06:47.393" UserDisplayName="ceejayoz" Text="The blurring line between web applications and desktop applications presents a major problem here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As the policy currently stands, a question of &quot;how do I set my signature in Microsoft Outlook&quot; will be acceptable, but &quot;how do I set my signature in Gmail&quot; would not be. Both involve a simple &quot;click here, then here, then type, then save&quot; answer. There's zero functional difference between them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Things get even more muddled if I'm running Gmail in an app that wraps Gmail as a desktop application with Google Gears offline support enabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How do we handle this? What happens when Microsoft Office gets an on-the-web version? What happens if Facebook gets a desktop client, or if someone asks about Facebook chat support in a Jabber client?" />
  <row Id="1471" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="830" RevisionGUID="50a594e7-dfa3-4a42-852b-3bb4f7593310" CreationDate="2010-02-19T22:07:24.913" UserDisplayName="zombies" Text="Another problem is that if a video game console is even mentioned it will get closed, that is: **not if it is related to video gaming, but instead appears to be**... For example, http://superuser.com/questions/87533/how-to-set-up-windows-7-to-stream-media-to-my-ps3-closed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this question, he could be streaming to a regular media server as opposed to a PS3, it isn't here nor there. But it gets closed by over zealous mods anyway, yet I could have benefited from further answers/follow-up. Did anyone else except that mod want to close the question? It is a pretty valid question." />
  <row Id="1472" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="831" RevisionGUID="daae4f7e-816e-47bf-8b24-33f43502dcd8" CreationDate="2010-02-20T01:54:35.383" UserDisplayName="OverloadUT" Text="This new policy is completely and totally ridiculous. Where do we draw a line at where a webapp starts and ends?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Is asking a question about MySQL not&#xD;&#xA;   allowed, because it's most often used&#xD;&#xA;   by web servers?&#xD;&#xA; - If a piece of hardware or software allows you to access it via a webpage (such as uTorrent, or any home router) is that not allowed because it serves a webpage?&#xD;&#xA; - If a piece of software runs on a webserver, *but is not accessed via a browser*, such as a stat tracker, is that allowed?&#xD;&#xA; - If an application runs via command line and outputs html log files, and then you must open those log files in your browser to see the information, is that not allowed? How is that ANY different?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The line gets blurrier and blurrier as I think of more examples." />
  <row Id="1473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="832" RevisionGUID="52b2ca42-2ba1-4f8c-adff-25ac9c781fd9" CreationDate="2010-02-20T07:14:41.250" UserDisplayName="NoCatharsis" Text="Sometimes I feel like the moderators have not read their own verbiage in a while, particular pertaining to Super User being a site for &quot;computer enthusiasts and power users.&quot; To take it one step further, I think there are logical fallacies within the first answer of the SU FAQ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I consider myself a computer enthusiast, I have many questions about the internet, which is a network exclusively made for, and accessible by, computers. In fact I cannot think of many other devices capable of accessing the internet without also having the capability of computing and interpreting the data to output media.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Under these considerations, I think I am making a logical connection between web applications run exclusively on the internet, and client-side applications run offline. Both are well within the scope of &quot;computer software&quot; and, I can only assume, are used on a daily basis by &quot;computer enthusiasts.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To address what Super User &quot;is **not about**&quot; (i.e. game consoles, social websites, mobile devices, and other electronic devices), I would certainly say the moderators have contradicted themselves by arbitrarily eliminating these topics from discussion. As soon as game consoles run off the brainpower of tiny hamsters, or Twitter devolves to telegraph (or ceases to exist - I can only hope), I believe all of these items are within the defined scope of &quot;computer hardware&quot; and &quot;computer software&quot; as stated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps before moderating potentially valuable questions from enthusiasts and super users, a certain amount of moderation should be enforced upon those who dictate the moderation. The question at hand is not *why* particular posts are closed, but *under which part* are they closed according to the FAQ stipulations - the top half of the answer, or the bottom half of the same answer?" />
  <row Id="1474" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="833" RevisionGUID="8f2a5d4b-6e17-4307-b593-b1e779927594" CreationDate="2010-02-20T10:07:39.537" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Unfortunately with this debate having gone on for some time now, and I am not sure what the answer should be I do feel I need to make a few points clear. Super User has grown with regards to visits at a considerable rate, and even on the number of questions it is 500 questions away from overtaking Server Fault and is heading towards reaching Stack Overflow proportions most likely within the next year. The site is popular due to it's wide audience, and is starting to stand on it's own. This was all achieved in just over 6 months of the site existing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To have a look at the actual numbers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Total Questions]** 28,373  &#xD;&#xA;**[Total Unanswered]** 3,845  &#xD;&#xA;**[Total Closed]** 2,280&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Drilling down further and looking at the [WordPress], [GMail], [PS3], [iPhone], [Google] and [X-Box] tags as a sample:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Total WordPress]** 125  &#xD;&#xA;**[Total GMail]** 284  &#xD;&#xA;**[Total PS3]** 27  &#xD;&#xA;**[Total X-Box]** 3  &#xD;&#xA;**[Total iPhone]** 477  &#xD;&#xA;**[Total Google]** 206  &#xD;&#xA;**[Total Closed]** 350+&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;Totals as at the time of posting this answer&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;**Please Note** I only looked at the tags on Super User since this is what we use to analyse the data with, **not Google search results**. Without adding every tag, if I do a look at anything starting with Google, you could possibly add another 200 questions to the count above, therefore the figure is still less then 1% of all Super User questions.&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Arguably I am not looking at every tag but these are the major once. Therefore we are splitting hairs over less then 1% of the questions asked on Super User, for which there is now a policy to disallow them. Therefore it is safe to assume that at least 90% of the questions asked on SuperUser does not involve a Web Application or Website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The debate about what should be allowed has come up many times, and to be fair before I became a moderator on Super User, I provided answers to the web applications and console questions. It is extremely rare that I would close a question without one of three things happening:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - The question is moderator flagged by someone with less then 3K reputation&#xD;&#xA; - The question is flagged to be closed and on the moderator tools close page&#xD;&#xA; - Jeff explicitly closes similar questions or makes a change to the policy in this regard.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The types of questions being flagged are reviewed and discussed, either on Meta (90% of the time) or otherwise between the moderators themselves. Not every flagged question is closed however this is rare, but I can say right now there is 3 questions on the close list I won't close because I don't agree that they should be. A feature I would love is for moderators to be able to clear close flags completely, but that's a different topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The gaming, web applications and iPhone question policy was put in place because the **majority** of moderator flags and close votes we have received in the past was for these questions. The problem on Meta is that the responses are slightly off since only around 1% of the registered Super Users actually participate or are even aware of Meta.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of the day, based on the figures, it doesn't make difference to the Super Users on the site whether we allow them or not. However for the moderators that have to keep the site clean, eliminating these reduces the amount of flags and questions we have to deal with regularly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lastly as pointed out by Jeff in a response to Lance via e-mail.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The moderators are following the policies set out by him, and doing what he wants&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are the bad guys because our names end up on the closed questions, but we do our best to follow the guidelines and policies set out by management. In this case management is Jeff and the developer team. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please keep in mind that the diamond moderators are elected by you, however we do not receive any compensation to do this, and participate freely. We sacrifice our time, and at times our own reputation whoring, to do this. We are human and make mistakes, and I have often re-opened questions when proven wrong. I have also got no objection to the community re-opening questions closed by a diamond moderator, since it is the best indication of what they want, unless the question directly violates the policy of the site." />
  <row Id="1475" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="834" RevisionGUID="e9c1e28a-80c1-4eb3-a3b7-e0ce1dbd8b97" CreationDate="2010-02-26T01:21:37.897" UserDisplayName="Herb Caudill" Text="This is a very shortsighted policy, and it's not one that's going to age well. Web apps are computer software. The only difference between Excel and Google Spreadsheets is the delivery mechanism. With online versions of Office apps starting to appear, are you now going to try to find out whether the user is referring to the online version or the shrink-wrapped version? The apps themselves are quite different now, but it's just a matter of time until they're identical. " />
  <row Id="1476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="835" RevisionGUID="d245d826-6947-4312-ba05-495f7e961345" CreationDate="2010-04-19T19:57:57.580" UserDisplayName="Jeff Martin" Text="I not only agree that banning questions on Web Apps or Web Services is short sighted but the description for smartphones is lacking as well.  My android phones are mini-computers that have an OS, a Keyboard, a Screen, memory and storage.  Questions about software running on those should be valid whether they are connecting to a PC or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These two branches of exclusion really are blocking of a large field of view of related technical questions that could be filled by superuser." />
  <row Id="1477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="821" RevisionGUID="4355e612-e6e0-40c5-a831-4e89b75f9d61" CreationDate="2010-02-16T17:02:17.360" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="I recently asked [this question][1] on Super User, and a big discussion arose on appropriate questions.  The issue came down to the new verbiage in the FAQ:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I had figured that the websites line was just about social networking software (which a case could be made for closing the question I asked), but Diago said that they were shutting down ALL website application questions.  So I can ask a question about Microsoft Office or OpenOffice.org, but I can't ask a question about Google Apps.  He confirmed this, and after I pointed out that 34 pages (x50) of hits when you did a SU search on &quot;google&quot;, he said that they would all be closed as they came up on the home page.  Notice that with other website type questions, you're probably looking at 20% of SuperUser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In Coding Horror, Jeff has blogged about [Web Applications][3], and has stated what we all know, that they are pervasive and replacing normal software.  His most relevant quote is &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; for an increasingly large percentage&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of users, the desktop application is&#xD;&#xA;&gt; already dead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So why is the new SuperUser moderator policy to marginalize these questions, and is it a good decision?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it will only hurt them in the long run, as they fight a software trend that is only growing more and more.  I've asked a few [website related questions][4] on Super User, and have always been pleased with the quick answers that have come forth.  I think website **application** questions are very relevant and should be allowed.  The only difference between web apps and desktop apps is what's running the interface.  They're both software that has to be used, and therefore the same type of questions come up for both.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**We don't need to be fighting the future in our quest to clean up SuperUser.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**  I just had to ask a question about the Opera Mini browser, but wasn't sure whether questions about browsers would be allowed, so I had to ask it on another site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT2:**  [Podcast #76][5] has a conversation between Joel and Jeff about this topic, from appox. 25:00 to 30:50.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT3:**  I've just received the email from Jeff that states **that the moderators are doing what he wants**.  He can edit this post if he'd like to post more information on his point of view.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**End of Bounty EDIT:**  I don't completely agree with any of these answers, but will pick Diago's since I feel it is the most complete, though I do think the percentage of web-app questions is higher than 1%.  Time will tell on all these things.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/104846/how-do-you-get-your-picture-up-on-google-wave&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/8890/superuser.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2009/08/all-programming-is-web-programming.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superuser.com/questions/14022/how-do-you-find-the-trash-in-the-latest-release-of-gmail-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/12/podcast-76/" />
  <row Id="1478" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="821" RevisionGUID="4355e612-e6e0-40c5-a831-4e89b75f9d61" CreationDate="2010-02-16T17:02:17.360" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="Super User website applications policy" />
  <row Id="1479" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="821" RevisionGUID="4355e612-e6e0-40c5-a831-4e89b75f9d61" CreationDate="2010-02-16T17:02:17.360" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;policy&gt;" />
  <row Id="1480" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="821" RevisionGUID="e8f18fed-e7aa-4e95-9767-1d29bacb7b2d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:49.310" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39615/super-user-website-applications-policy" Text="" />
  <row Id="1481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="837" RevisionGUID="304742b6-a9a4-4bb9-bea0-a3249cce8ea2" CreationDate="2010-02-19T15:12:06.880" UserDisplayName="I left my body to science" Text="Mac OS X Version 10.5.6 is Leopard (I think), so maybe [Mac] [OSX-Leopard]" />
  <row Id="1482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="838" RevisionGUID="054fd110-2803-4dd7-92cf-3b1ba428729b" CreationDate="2010-02-19T16:34:22.187" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Done, Done and Done." />
  <row Id="1483" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="836" RevisionGUID="eeee5718-7ed7-4b90-aa78-e83cc4985871" CreationDate="2010-02-19T13:39:20.430" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="There are [only three `[macosx]` questions][1] on Super User at this moment.  All of them are closed (migrated from SU to elsewhere), so I can't retag them, nominate them for deletion, or even flag them for moderator attention.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could a Diamond mod please go through and either&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - convert `[macosx]` into `[mac]` and/or `[osx]` where appropriate, or&#xD;&#xA; - just delete the durned things?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;they were all posted and migrated in November, so there's really no need to keep them around...&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[post one][2], [post two][3], [post three][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/macosx&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/66100/how-can-i-fix-xcode-compiling-everything-all-the-time-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/68408/osx-server-how-to-create-internet-sharing-with-quota-tracking-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superuser.com/questions/69160/will-setting-mysql-root-password-prevent-it-from-autostarting-closed" />
  <row Id="1484" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="836" RevisionGUID="eeee5718-7ed7-4b90-aa78-e83cc4985871" CreationDate="2010-02-19T13:39:20.430" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="SuperUser retag request: [macosx] -&gt; [mac] + [osx] (diamond mods only!)" />
  <row Id="1485" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="836" RevisionGUID="eeee5718-7ed7-4b90-aa78-e83cc4985871" CreationDate="2010-02-19T13:39:20.430" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;&lt;delete-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1486" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="836" RevisionGUID="63d33f1b-e4cb-4370-b595-1d646da39af9" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:52.430" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39929/superuser-retag-request-macosx-mac-osx-diamond-mods-only" Text="" />
  <row Id="1487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="840" RevisionGUID="768e8a87-ff76-4929-acf1-fa86b348d524" CreationDate="2010-03-05T07:38:35.543" Text="I agree, we probably don't need syntax highlighting on Super User -- it can now be disabled on a per-site basis. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(The prettify JavaScript is still served; that'd be a much deeper change.)" />
  <row Id="1488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="839" RevisionGUID="91872403-076a-4176-9c3a-a942a8939733" CreationDate="2010-02-22T23:05:25.850" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="On SU, can we remove the default syntax highlighting?  It seems that most uses for the Markdown 4-space-indent-code-block on SU are not actual code, and the syntax highlighting is more of a hindrance than a help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think what SU really needs isn't a *code block*, but a *preformatted block*, and I think the user-friendliest implemementation would simply change the 4-space-indent Markdown to render as `&lt;pre&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;` instead of `&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's [one awful example][1] (see the [first revision][2]).  The syntax highlighting was useless to the final rendering of the post, and it made the post hideously slow to load.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/114161/win7-bluescreen-irq-not-less-or-equal-athrxusb-sys&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/posts/114161/revisions" />
  <row Id="1489" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="839" RevisionGUID="91872403-076a-4176-9c3a-a942a8939733" CreationDate="2010-02-22T23:05:25.850" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="Turn Markdown &quot;code&quot; blocks into plain &quot;preformatted&quot; blocks on Super User" />
  <row Id="1490" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="839" RevisionGUID="91872403-076a-4176-9c3a-a942a8939733" CreationDate="2010-02-22T23:05:25.850" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;syntax-highlighting&gt;&lt;editor&gt;" />
  <row Id="1491" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="839" RevisionGUID="33e7653d-ecff-447e-86a0-7c4c5cef30bc" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:52.873" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/40251/turn-markdown-code-blocks-into-plain-preformatted-blocks-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1492" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="841" RevisionGUID="c3287f8e-b32a-4dba-8e15-6d8280b57abf" CreationDate="2010-02-24T21:29:38.773" UserDisplayName="Dr. Gonzo" Text="I've noticed that Super User has [granted me][1] two &quot;Nice Answer&quot; badges. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yet I can only see one answer of my own which would appear to qualify. Additionally, I seem to have a &quot;Good Answer&quot; badge on Super User which I do not appear to deserve at all. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Checking the vote counts on the other highest-voted answers I have there, it doesn't appear to be a case where I had an answer that was upvoted above 10, then downvoted below. Ditto (naturally) the 25-vote threshold for &quot;Good Answer.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do I have answers which were perhaps deleted (or on questions which were deleted/migrated) that garnered the requisite upvotes for these badges? Do I merely &quot;owe&quot; the system them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/1086/john-rudy" />
  <row Id="1493" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="841" RevisionGUID="c3287f8e-b32a-4dba-8e15-6d8280b57abf" CreationDate="2010-02-24T21:29:38.773" UserDisplayName="Dr. Gonzo" Text="Extra &quot;Nice Answer&quot; Badge and &quot;Good Answer&quot;?" />
  <row Id="1494" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="841" RevisionGUID="c3287f8e-b32a-4dba-8e15-6d8280b57abf" CreationDate="2010-02-24T21:29:38.773" UserDisplayName="Dr. Gonzo" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;badges&gt;" />
  <row Id="1495" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="841" RevisionGUID="e738a3ab-63a8-4eff-a567-f3abfd6d00dc" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:53.923" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/40472/extra-nice-answer-badge-and-good-answer" Text="" />
  <row Id="1496" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="843" RevisionGUID="391a4e07-82f3-4d67-9f5d-c9db234503b6" CreationDate="2010-02-24T23:27:51.593" UserDisplayName="Pollyanna" Text="Unfortunately I am not ensconced in SU enough to know what is and isn't acceptable.  Off the cuff I'd say that the question as currently formed is fine.  Regardless, I've posted an answer as a comment, and will include it here with additional commentary:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The power supply shall contain protection circuitry such that the application of an input voltage below the minimum specified in Section 3.1, Table 1, shall not cause damage to the power supply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From section 3.1.3 of Intel's ATX12V power supply design guide - http://www.formfactors.org/developer/specs/ATX12V_PSDG_2_2_public_br2.pdf&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Power supplies have an input section composed of a bunch of silly circuitry that, at the end of the day, provides about 308 VAC to a transformer, which then powers the regulation and conditioning circuitry.  This silly circuitry actually forms the major basis of the regulation circuitry, and if you are using less than the full wattage of the power supply may be able to manage with significant undervoltage conditions without falling out of regulation on the output side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a brownout occurs, the powersupply will attempt to deliver the rated current for as long as it can (based on the incoming voltage and current) and if it cannot maintain regulation it'll deassert the `Power Good` signal going to the motherboard.  The motherboard is responsible for deasserting the `power on` signal going to the supply, and if it does so in time, then the supply will drop all it rails and turn off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the motherboard fails to do this, the powersupply should drop its rails when it falls too far out of regulation, but that is not guaranteed, and with low quality power supplies you may find your components and motherboard receiving undervoltage conditions as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What happens at that point depends on how robust those components are, but it's generally not a good thing." />
  <row Id="1497" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="844" RevisionGUID="139b3773-90bf-459b-95d7-1114e6d42cca" CreationDate="2010-02-24T23:35:28.723" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="After reviewing the comments and with the edits made I have re-opened the question. It was moderator flagged and already had 3 re-open votes and would have been open fairly soon. I am not normally online at 1:00am so there was a slight delay in cleaning it up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for the reason it was closed. It was not voted closed but moderator flagged. You will not be able to see the moderator flags, and user without the ability to close do flag questions as well. At the time I did agree with the flagged comments.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have become fairly strict on the level of questions that cover a gray area we allow solely because of the nature of Super User. However I will say that in the last few days I have re-opened quite a few questions, which is a nice change." />
  <row Id="1498" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="842" RevisionGUID="6a9ff63c-8ab3-4294-a671-0128a94387fb" CreationDate="2010-02-24T23:02:29.307" UserDisplayName="Earlz" Text="Hello, I posted what I thought was a legitimate question on Super User at http://superuser.com/questions/113113/why-are-brownouts-so-harmful-closed &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It was closed almost immediately as not a real question with the explanation &quot;This is not a discussion site&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think if it were to be closed it'd be for not computer related, but not for &quot;not a real question.&quot; This was also closed by a moderator, without any other community request for the closing(no downvotes or close votes or even comments saying I'm stupid)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do requests for an explanation not count as a question? " />
  <row Id="1499" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="842" RevisionGUID="6a9ff63c-8ab3-4294-a671-0128a94387fb" CreationDate="2010-02-24T23:02:29.307" UserDisplayName="Earlz" Text="Reopen request for SU?" />
  <row Id="1500" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="842" RevisionGUID="6a9ff63c-8ab3-4294-a671-0128a94387fb" CreationDate="2010-02-24T23:02:29.307" UserDisplayName="Earlz" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;reopen-closed&gt;" />
  <row Id="1501" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="842" RevisionGUID="b6468a05-b9ed-497e-9956-93e7fde98dd6" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:54.267" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/40477/reopen-request-for-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="846" RevisionGUID="571dea45-7092-4acc-bbf0-5bd2eb0afaaf" CreationDate="2010-03-02T16:46:09.187" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="Good idea, we should move all the singular `driver` to the plural `drivers`." />
  <row Id="1503" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="847" RevisionGUID="53809dda-8839-45ba-84c8-250755a447a8" CreationDate="2010-03-02T20:34:40.260" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I've done the merge as requested. " />
  <row Id="1504" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="845" RevisionGUID="7c0bb449-3c80-43cf-8aa1-a3aa4cfa9e4a" CreationDate="2010-03-02T16:41:22.083" UserDisplayName="heavyd" Text="**Updated:**  driver(180) to drivers(131)" />
  <row Id="1505" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="845" RevisionGUID="7c0bb449-3c80-43cf-8aa1-a3aa4cfa9e4a" CreationDate="2010-03-02T16:41:22.083" UserDisplayName="heavyd" Text="SU retag request :  driver to drivers" />
  <row Id="1506" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="845" RevisionGUID="7c0bb449-3c80-43cf-8aa1-a3aa4cfa9e4a" CreationDate="2010-03-02T16:41:22.083" UserDisplayName="heavyd" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1507" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="845" RevisionGUID="f3f93a01-8f07-4bb4-bb5b-310eb88ef62b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:54.550" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/40907/su-retag-request-driver-to-drivers" Text="" />
  <row Id="1508" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="849" RevisionGUID="0b9e9ca1-420b-46ff-b4c5-1582f30e1b2c" CreationDate="2010-03-08T21:16:37.837" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="If an answer or comment was deleted you might see a notification of recent activity but not see what caused it.  That's happened to me, though I wouldn't think you'd still see it two days later." />
  <row Id="1509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="850" RevisionGUID="35ba6ee9-862f-4629-8621-63b877a00dbe" CreationDate="2010-03-08T21:17:37.490" UserDisplayName="Pollyanna" Text="It's a mystery.  The timeline shows the last activity was February 5th:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/posts/54108/timeline" />
  <row Id="1510" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="852" RevisionGUID="d32b2572-275e-407b-a0c1-aaef60fb9afc" CreationDate="2010-03-08T22:10:09.503" UserDisplayName="Timothy Carter" Text="I believe the [Community User][1] &quot;bumps&quot; older posts that do not have an accepted answers and I believe this changes the latest activity date without displaying any viewable changes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From the Community User's profile:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I do things like&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - Randomly poke old unanswered questions every hour so they get some attention&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/-1" />
  <row Id="1511" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="851" RevisionGUID="eca993db-54e2-41c0-a71e-29de4662c617" CreationDate="2010-03-08T21:18:45.630" UserDisplayName="Jon B" Text="Is it possible that it was retagged through a tag merge? Are those exactly the tags you used?" />
  <row Id="1512" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="848" RevisionGUID="b0dace20-6ba3-4678-8002-80887aaf6d9d" CreationDate="2010-03-08T20:55:15.017" UserDisplayName="Farseeker" Text="I just logged onto SuperUser for the first time in several weeks, and I noticed that I have &quot;activity&quot; 2 days ago on a long-un-answered question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://superuser.com/questions/54108/multi-monitor-setup-goes-crazy-after-locking-unlocking-vista-machine][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can anyone shed any light on what that activity was? I can't see any comments, edits, revisions, answers, or anything. It also said I had new answers when I hit the homepage, but I don't see it anywhere either. Could it be that an answer was deleted?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If so, is there a better way of presenting this (non-)activity to the user?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/54108/multi-monitor-setup-goes-crazy-after-locking-unlocking-vista-machine" />
  <row Id="1513" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="848" RevisionGUID="b0dace20-6ba3-4678-8002-80887aaf6d9d" CreationDate="2010-03-08T20:55:15.017" UserDisplayName="Farseeker" Text="Last activity two days ago? Where?" />
  <row Id="1514" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="848" RevisionGUID="b0dace20-6ba3-4678-8002-80887aaf6d9d" CreationDate="2010-03-08T20:55:15.017" UserDisplayName="Farseeker" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;" />
  <row Id="1515" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="848" RevisionGUID="695ff608-7761-43c9-8152-e3d0500ae4d7" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:54.773" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/41547/last-activity-two-days-ago-where" Text="" />
  <row Id="1516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="854" RevisionGUID="7cbd90b7-10db-42cf-8a6e-9791b500ceaa" CreationDate="2010-03-08T23:21:59.967" UserDisplayName="Greg Hewgill" Text="Without commenting on your particular situation, it is certainly true that *not all* computer-related questions actually have a place on the SOFU trilogy. For example, I believe questions about how to use Facebook have been discussed and deemed inappropriate for SU." />
  <row Id="1517" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="853" RevisionGUID="3fc73cee-9483-4b23-81e8-96b406e1fdb4" CreationDate="2010-03-08T23:16:30.003" UserDisplayName="joaoc" Text="Why is cloud software shunned from SuperUser, since it is an increasing portion of the things users have to deal with nowadays?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I asked a question regarding how to select/install/configure blog software, for a specific end-user purpose.&#xD;&#xA;My question was [how to publish a blog privately (to a select number of people)](http://superuser.com/questions/117276/how-to-post-a-blog-without-public-access) and a good answer could range anywhere from recommending a service, running my own server/software or that it's too hard and not possible/worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Server-fault doesn't seem like the right place since that assumes you want to run the server beforehand, and stackoverflow definitively is not related.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where should users post cloud computing questions?" />
  <row Id="1518" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="853" RevisionGUID="3fc73cee-9483-4b23-81e8-96b406e1fdb4" CreationDate="2010-03-08T23:16:30.003" UserDisplayName="joaoc" Text="SuperUser mods are closing cloud questions. Where can we post them?" />
  <row Id="1519" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="853" RevisionGUID="3fc73cee-9483-4b23-81e8-96b406e1fdb4" CreationDate="2010-03-08T23:16:30.003" UserDisplayName="joaoc" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;cloud-computing&gt;&lt;cloud&gt;&lt;end-user&gt;" />
  <row Id="1520" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="853" RevisionGUID="b9fb0efd-1db5-46d5-9374-148899c55941" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:55.343" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/41564/superuser-mods-are-closing-cloud-questions-where-can-we-post-them" Text="" />
  <row Id="1521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="856" RevisionGUID="d5e224dd-a375-4a21-b7d1-118c70ba758c" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:18:48.300" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="* [**How-To Geek**][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * &quot;We encourage you to register on our forums and post any questions you might have.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/" />
  <row Id="1522" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="856" RevisionGUID="d5e224dd-a375-4a21-b7d1-118c70ba758c" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:18:48.300" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1523" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="857" RevisionGUID="3e531108-34b8-4fb0-9465-a730b06f67c2" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:22:58.163" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="* **Domain related**:&#xD;&#xA;    * [Ask About Domains][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.askaboutdomains.com/" />
  <row Id="1524" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="857" RevisionGUID="3e531108-34b8-4fb0-9465-a730b06f67c2" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:22:58.163" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1525" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="858" RevisionGUID="74dd8af0-d637-4eec-a0ca-a5cce335343b" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:25:30.267" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="* **IT PRO**:&#xD;&#xA;    * [Server Fault][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/" />
  <row Id="1526" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="858" RevisionGUID="74dd8af0-d637-4eec-a0ca-a5cce335343b" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:25:30.267" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1527" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="859" RevisionGUID="b9bc131a-625f-486a-bb11-80142b8c2e35" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:29:18.310" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="* [**doctype**][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * &quot;You can ask questions about CSS, HTML, web design and email design.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://doctype.com/" />
  <row Id="1528" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="859" RevisionGUID="b9bc131a-625f-486a-bb11-80142b8c2e35" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:29:18.310" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="860" RevisionGUID="0ab76d53-bbc4-4c6d-828d-75ec498c5a67" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:32:19.133" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="* **Smartphones**:&#xD;&#xA;    * [Force Close][1] - Android operating system.&#xD;&#xA;    * [Slide to Ask][2] - iPhone and iPod Touch questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forceclose.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://slidetoask.com/" />
  <row Id="1530" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="860" RevisionGUID="0ab76d53-bbc4-4c6d-828d-75ec498c5a67" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:32:19.133" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1531" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="861" RevisionGUID="91ecd850-f95a-45c7-9ae4-2c9572da66e9" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:39:11.517" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="* **Photo and video**:&#xD;&#xA;    * [Home4Film][1] - Home Theatre and music equipment purchasing, setup and use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://home4film.com/" />
  <row Id="1532" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="861" RevisionGUID="91ecd850-f95a-45c7-9ae4-2c9572da66e9" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:39:11.517" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="862" RevisionGUID="821837da-ed58-4017-b517-7ae8429b9c83" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:41:05.540" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="* **Programming**:&#xD;&#xA;    * [Stack Overflow][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/" />
  <row Id="1534" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="862" RevisionGUID="821837da-ed58-4017-b517-7ae8429b9c83" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:41:05.540" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1535" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="863" RevisionGUID="9cc49481-d42e-49cd-a77f-1a8e9712d256" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:49:10.777" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="* **Site specific**&#xD;&#xA;  * [Google Help forum portal][1] - Support forums for all google services.&#xD;&#xA;  * [Wordpress Support forum][2] - Support forum for Wordpress sites.&#xD;&#xA;  * [Facebook Help][3] - Help pages for using Facebook.&#xD;&#xA;  * [Twitter Help][4] - Help pages for using Twitter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wordpress.org/support/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.facebook.com/help/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://twitter.com/help/start" />
  <row Id="1536" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="863" RevisionGUID="9cc49481-d42e-49cd-a77f-1a8e9712d256" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:49:10.777" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1537" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="864" RevisionGUID="6f9b4cde-1726-4261-9a76-7f9b2c9d1d52" CreationDate="2010-05-27T18:44:41.540" UserDisplayName="David Cary" Text="&#xD;&#xA;  - **Robots**, Electronics, Hardware Hacking, &quot;physical computing&quot;&#xD;&#xA;    - ChipHacker http://chiphacker.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These ChipHacker people have totally stolen the StackOverflow look-and-feel.&#xD;&#xA;Do we need to aggressively respond to this &quot;attack on our identity&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;Or should we be happy that they are handling the sorts of low-level 8-bit stuff that we would rather not think about? Should we move some of our more hardware-y, less software-y questions to that site? (Such questions are often tagged &quot;robot&quot;, &quot;8-bit&quot;, &quot;microcontroller&quot;, &quot;PIC&quot;, &quot;Atmel&quot;, etc. on Stack Overflow).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1538" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="864" RevisionGUID="6f9b4cde-1726-4261-9a76-7f9b2c9d1d52" CreationDate="2010-05-27T18:44:41.540" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1539" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="855" RevisionGUID="53a7ab2a-f296-414d-b1e1-7d81f7722e34" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:11:54.997" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="Thank you for your confidence in our abilities!&#xD;&#xA;----------------------------------------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But have you read this? &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/faq&quot;&gt;FAQ&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We get a lot of **not** computer related questions on here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, someone here might be able to help you, but you'll find that other forums more focused on your topic can give you a much better answer than a bunch of Super Users.  It's likely that your question will be down-voted, closed, and in some cases marked &quot;offensive&quot;.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In that vein, here are a bunch of other forums where you can get help:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* **IT PRO**&#xD;&#xA;    * [Server Fault][1]&#xD;&#xA;* **Programming**&#xD;&#xA;    * [Stack Overflow][2]&#xD;&#xA;* **Web Design/Hosting/CMS**&#xD;&#xA;    * [doctype][3]&#xD;&#xA;* **Smartphones**:&#xD;&#xA;    * [Force Close][4] - Android operating system.&#xD;&#xA;    * [Slide to Ask][5] - iPhone and iPod Touch questions.&#xD;&#xA;    * [PhoneHow][6] - any smartphone questions (iPod Touch and iPad included)&#xD;&#xA;* **Domain related**&#xD;&#xA;    * [Ask About Domains][7]&#xD;&#xA;* **Photo and video**&#xD;&#xA;    * [Home4Film][8] - Home Theatre and music equipment purchasing, setup and use.&#xD;&#xA;* **Site specific**&#xD;&#xA;    * [Google Help forum portal][9] - Support forums for all Google services.&#xD;&#xA;    * [WordPress Support forum][10] - Support forum for WordPress sites.&#xD;&#xA;    * [Facebook Help][11] - Help pages for using Facebook.&#xD;&#xA;    * [Twitter Help][12] - Help pages for using Twitter.&#xD;&#xA;* **Anything**&#xD;&#xA;    * [How-To Geek][13]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Check out the answers below for even more suggestions!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;What forums can people go to to ask the questions that are off topic here?  Please list only ONE forum per answer so votes can bring the best forums to the top. When possible, specify a category in which your suggestion should go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://serverfault.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://doctype.com&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://forceclose.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://slidetoask.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://phonehow.com&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.askaboutdomains.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://home4film.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://www.google.com/support/forum/&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://wordpress.org/support/&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://www.facebook.com/help/?section=community&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://twitter.com/help/start&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/" />
  <row Id="1540" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="855" RevisionGUID="53a7ab2a-f296-414d-b1e1-7d81f7722e34" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:11:54.997" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="Where can I ask questions that aren't Super User questions?" />
  <row Id="1541" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="855" RevisionGUID="53a7ab2a-f296-414d-b1e1-7d81f7722e34" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:11:54.997" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;faq&gt;&lt;questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="1542" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="855" RevisionGUID="53a7ab2a-f296-414d-b1e1-7d81f7722e34" CreationDate="2010-03-09T00:11:54.997" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1543" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="855" RevisionGUID="4d1671ed-f8fb-4a5c-8968-86ff1ad38637" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:56.023" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/41570/where-can-i-ask-questions-that-arent-super-user-questions" Text="" />
  <row Id="1544" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="866" RevisionGUID="966f3f41-6113-41c1-aed6-d02b883b2fec" CreationDate="2010-03-09T18:45:07.440" UserDisplayName="squillman" Text="Probably the JS is messed up in your browser cache.  Flush your browser cache and reload, see if that fixes it for you." />
  <row Id="1545" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="865" RevisionGUID="afaefa33-bfbb-4579-8002-f6f57aca1c8e" CreationDate="2010-03-09T18:42:15.477" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="I cannot seem to vote on Superuser. I can on Stackoverflow however. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Error log in Firefox says `Error: vote is not defined`." />
  <row Id="1546" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="865" RevisionGUID="afaefa33-bfbb-4579-8002-f6f57aca1c8e" CreationDate="2010-03-09T18:42:15.477" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="Cannot vote at all, but can edit / tag etc." />
  <row Id="1547" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="865" RevisionGUID="afaefa33-bfbb-4579-8002-f6f57aca1c8e" CreationDate="2010-03-09T18:42:15.477" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;voting&gt;&lt;browser-cache&gt;" />
  <row Id="1548" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="865" RevisionGUID="ccf6ab13-d5cd-45b2-a29f-fed271e1bd3e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:57.480" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/41652/cannot-vote-at-all-but-can-edit-tag-etc" Text="" />
  <row Id="1549" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="868" RevisionGUID="4236ef14-331e-43df-abb1-3447a90bbe99" CreationDate="2010-03-10T23:49:55.807" UserDisplayName="Pekka" Text="That is totally unacceptable behaviour. It would be like posting links to [Unicorns][1] in totally non-[Unicorn][2] related answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It would be even worse if he used image links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[![alt text][4]][3]&#xD;&#xA;[![alt text][5]][3]&#xD;&#xA;[![alt text][6]][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Seriously though, if there's a pattern, I would vote to close as Spam and maybe flag for moderator attention. If you're unsure, a question on Meta with links will give you feedback from the community, plus usually a moderator or two will see the issue straight away.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/37328/my-godits-full-of-unicorns&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/37328/my-godits-full-of-unicorns&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/37328/my-godits-full-of-unicorns&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/6113/51d623f33f8b83095db84ff.png&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/8789/c60d994d29c63ea5d837029.png&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/6148/43722cb1e955874a8eb721e.png" />
  <row Id="1550" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="869" RevisionGUID="15b58ffb-b7b8-47da-82b8-4965af119e71" CreationDate="2010-03-10T23:50:04.137" UserDisplayName="Ether" Text="If you think it's spam, flag it as spam and the post will be automatically deleted (and the user will be hit with -100 to reputation) if five other users agree.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you aren't sure, you can always flag anything for moderator attention. " />
  <row Id="1551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="870" RevisionGUID="d586e826-a30b-4a39-9cbd-701e1b332c45" CreationDate="2010-03-11T00:22:25.083" UserDisplayName="Kop" Text="&gt; Multiple links in almost all of his /&#xD;&#xA;&gt; her questions with less then half of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; them with accepted answers.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I can't tell if he's simply being a&#xD;&#xA;&gt; good user with lots of links in his&#xD;&#xA;&gt; questions or someone who's asking lots&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of questions trying to increase site&#xD;&#xA;&gt; traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Multiple links always to the same website or to different ones? In the former case it's probably spam, in the latter case he's just a linky person (yay I made up a new word)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**: saw the links, come up how can that be spam? Do you think he owns all of those websites?" />
  <row Id="1552" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="871" RevisionGUID="e784e785-9878-4401-9845-bdf0951909ae" CreationDate="2010-03-11T18:48:55.700" UserDisplayName="ベレアー アダム" Text="Doesn't look like spam according to the regular definition of spam.  If we have spammers that are so clever as to actually ask useful and interesting questions in order to provide links, then by definition it's no longer spam.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In other words, as long as the content is topical and informative, the user's intentions are completely irrelevant.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Contrast:  Users who genuinely want help but ask for it in such a disjointed and ungrammatical way as to be incomprehensible have their questions closed.  We don't care whether they were *trying* to be coherent or not, all that matters is that they were incoherent.  The same applies in reverse." />
  <row Id="1553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="872" RevisionGUID="22241626-aa34-4d06-8b16-835160fd7ae4" CreationDate="2010-03-11T23:14:07.607" UserDisplayName="Zypher" Text="I don't see anything spammy about those links the majority seem to be pointing back to other similar, but not quite related enough questions. The next highest number are support forums for well known vendors that have no need to have someone spam for them (roxio and apple off the top of my head) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also his listed website doesn't strike me as a spammer's at all. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me it seems like someone who has done their research, gotten stuck, and included links to what they have already found. " />
  <row Id="1554" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="867" RevisionGUID="4e19941e-6f1b-4af4-a771-b6d623b0ad42" CreationDate="2010-03-10T23:36:21.023" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="I feel that a user is asking questions without the purpose of gaining an answer, but to rather link to several other sites. Multiple links in almost all of his / her questions with less then half of them with accepted answers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't tell if he's simply being a good user with lots of links in his questions or someone who's asking lots of questions trying to increase site traffic. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From [Lazarus Form Recovery for Safari?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;I use [Lazarus][2] a lot on Chrome and FireFox. Well, not a lot, but it's great for crashing when you're writing something online in a form that doesn't automatically save what you're writing. Plus, this should be default in every browser ANYway, and not built-in any web site (such as gmail).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;So, is there any such option for Safari?&#xD;&#xA;Does [Saft][3] do that? Just by looking at the home page, it seems to me like bloatware to Safari 4.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;From [Configuring 2 disks to run at same time on Time Machine][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Ok, so rotating two disks with Time&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Machine is rather [simple][5].&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Probably simpler than [using 3rd part&#xD;&#xA;&gt; to do backups (from this worth reading&#xD;&#xA;&gt; FAQ about TM)][6] of it.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I actually like to keep half my&#xD;&#xA;&gt; macbook's disk for TM and I want to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; add an external disk.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Problem is: I can only choose one to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; backup on TM's settings.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; One possible solution is [setting up&#xD;&#xA;&gt; TM to a RAID][7], but I'm not sure&#xD;&#xA;&gt; this is a good idea, and I believe it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; would require both disks (or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; partitions) being the same size.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Currently I think it's better to just&#xD;&#xA;&gt; manually rotate, by going to settings&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and changing the selected disk daily,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; or whatever frequency.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; I think the question here is: how can&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I do this automatically?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And more:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/109885/instant-email-alerts-and-notifications-closed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/110197/new-macbooks-touchpad-customizing-middle-clicks-and-few-swipe-actions-natively&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/112027/keeping-mac-osx-up-and-sleepless-while-task-app-is-running&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/112921/how-could-i-safely-fix-my-walking-dead-pixel-bug&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/114253/backup-gmail-using-mail-app-and-imap-without-redundancy&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/116136/real-time-chat-translation-on-mac-using-either-skype-adium-or-ichat&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/116292/wheres-my-free-space-gone-on-my-mac-closed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/117621/how-to-merge-and-not-replace-folders-when-copying-on-mac&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/118424/old-leopard-expose-on-snow-leopard-for-mac&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/118463/no-reason-to-be-unable-to-mount-dmg-from-tuneup-and-no-errors-given-on-mac&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/118487/dmg-mounting-warning-message-says-it-may-make-computer-less-secure-or-cause-othe&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Again, some of these look like legitimate questions, but for the most part it looks like a lot of links to other forums and boards, applications, and developer sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20090603163307642&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1964018#25&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://forums.macosxhints.com/showpost.php?p=512788&amp;postcount=20&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/109681/lazarus-form-recovery-for-safari&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://lazarus.interclue.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://haoli.dnsalias.com/Saft/&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superuser.com/questions/109855/configuring-2-disks-to-run-at-same-time-on-time-machine" />
  <row Id="1555" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="867" RevisionGUID="4e19941e-6f1b-4af4-a771-b6d623b0ad42" CreationDate="2010-03-10T23:36:21.023" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="User spamming - intentional or not?" />
  <row Id="1556" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="867" RevisionGUID="4e19941e-6f1b-4af4-a771-b6d623b0ad42" CreationDate="2010-03-10T23:36:21.023" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;hyperlinks&gt;&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="1557" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="867" RevisionGUID="e2bdd3f7-bc0f-4f8b-b386-f0776405e5d1" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:57.683" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/41800/user-spamming-intentional-or-not" Text="" />
  <row Id="1558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="874" RevisionGUID="f7bfa6d7-c899-4c05-ad02-c79b84366faf" CreationDate="2010-03-13T16:53:39.393" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="Did you know about this one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Force Close][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Force Close is a question and answer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; site for questions about the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; open-source Android operating system&#xD;&#xA;&gt; that runs on cell phones (like the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Google Nexus One, Motorola Droid and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; more.) It's 100% free, no registration&#xD;&#xA;&gt; required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's actually one of the more active [StackExchange sites][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://forceclose.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4/list-of-stackexchange-sites" />
  <row Id="1559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="873" RevisionGUID="a09de738-8383-4a11-ba4a-59516200189f" CreationDate="2010-03-13T16:36:35.683" UserDisplayName="Mauricio Scheffer" Text="Android questions on superuser are getting closed as &quot;not computer related&quot;. Examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * http://superuser.com/questions/116579/does-terminal-emulator-work-the-same-as-android-debug-bridge-closed&#xD;&#xA; * http://superuser.com/questions/116960/htc-android-mail-imap-folders-not-synchronous-closed&#xD;&#xA; * http://superuser.com/questions/115514/on-demand-rtsp-to-android-closed&#xD;&#xA; * http://superuser.com/questions/114340/is-there-a-database-app-for-android-and-if-not-whats-the-problem-closed&#xD;&#xA; * http://superuser.com/questions/115739/android-mail-app-thread-vs-conversation-closed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lots more on http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/android, almost all of them are closed as &quot;not computer related&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [FAQ][1] states: &quot;Super User [...] is not about [...] cellphones or mobile devices, except smartphones such as iPhone that interface with your computer&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * Android per se is just a platform, an [operating system][2]. It's not a device.&#xD;&#xA; * [Android runs on lots of devices][3], [including netbooks][4] and even [standard x86 architectures][5] (any PC). Android is *fundamentally* different from iPhone because of this, so the same criteria for superuser questions cannot be applied.&#xD;&#xA; * Android devices *do* interface with other computers (via TCP/IP, HTTP, IMAP, and any standard protocol) just like any other computer, because *they are computers*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's pick one of the closed questions: http://superuser.com/questions/116960/htc-android-mail-imap-folders-not-synchronous-closed . How is this different from a question about Thunderbird or Outlook?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another: http://superuser.com/questions/115514/on-demand-rtsp-to-android-closed . How is it different from a question about any RTSP client/server on a PC or MAC ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Other similar meta questions on this topic:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; * http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/13289/is-asking-phone-questions-permitted-on-superuser&#xD;&#xA; * http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/16087/are-iphone-ipod-ipod-touch-questions-computer-related-superuser&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think either the FAQ has to be revised to be more clear about this, or the moderators need to be moderated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/faq&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_(operating_system)&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Android_devices&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://gizmodo.com/5381868/acer-aspire-one-aod250-boots-android-and-win-xp-holds-us-over-until-chrome-os-arrives&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.androidx86.org/" />
  <row Id="1560" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="873" RevisionGUID="a09de738-8383-4a11-ba4a-59516200189f" CreationDate="2010-03-13T16:36:35.683" UserDisplayName="Mauricio Scheffer" Text="Android questions on superuser getting closed as &quot;not computer related&quot;" />
  <row Id="1561" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="873" RevisionGUID="a09de738-8383-4a11-ba4a-59516200189f" CreationDate="2010-03-13T16:36:35.683" UserDisplayName="Mauricio Scheffer" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;android&gt;" />
  <row Id="1562" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="873" RevisionGUID="8c38147f-f163-4a30-b6af-33b1cfba63e8" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:58.627" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42146/android-questions-on-superuser-getting-closed-as-not-computer-related" Text="" />
  <row Id="1563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="876" RevisionGUID="dda36434-a21e-42d9-8885-51332cae3443" CreationDate="2010-03-14T16:53:02.627" UserDisplayName="John Saunders" Text="Will, the FAQ includes the following as one of the things SU is **not** about:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- electronic devices or media players, except insofar as they interface with your computer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your question is about things that take place entirely on your Zune.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, if you were asking about how to use the Zune desktop application to change the sort order of your podcasts, then, to me, that would be a different issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks to ~quack, but I missed the fact that this is happening during a sync. A sync is something between the computer and the device, and the desktop software on the computer controls it. This suggests the sort order mush be determined by the desktop, so this sounds like it should be ok on Zune.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would suggest rewording the question to make it clear that you want to change the sort order in the desktop application in order to change the order on the device.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="877" RevisionGUID="3b056a4d-9dbe-4ed4-ac46-9d95a223135f" CreationDate="2010-03-14T17:45:37.207" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="I'm having trouble deciding about the question in question.  When I originally read it, it *seemed* to be asking how to change the sort order on the device, but it was very rant-ish and I didn't read very closely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But when I read it again, this phrase caught my attention:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; As items are added to the sync list they end up sorted in some weird manner [...]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*That* sounds like a problem occurring *during the sync*, which is *explicitly allowed* by the SU FAQ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My knee-jerk response, as someone who will never own a Zune and doesn't know exactly how they work, is that the podcast sorting is possibly dependent on the files' metadata (tags).  This means fixing them depends on a) a knowledge of what tags the device looks for, and b) software on a computer to correct the tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point, *you*, Will, need to convince *us* (and especially the mods) that the question is related more to the files and the computer than the Zune.  If you can't do that, the question in question is not likely to be reopened.  I've tried to get you onto a better footing -- by editing your question to get rid of the rant, and to bring the sync issue front-and-center -- but the rest is up to you." />
  <row Id="1565" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="875" RevisionGUID="8e1e43a7-13e2-460c-a5da-c284703812c5" CreationDate="2010-03-14T16:22:06.653" UserDisplayName="Will" Text="Related bitchfest:  http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42146/android-questions-on-superuser-getting-closed-as-not-computer-related&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(am so aggravated... deleting dumb rant)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can we get some sort of official ruling on questions for the Zune on superuser?  Because closing this question I asked is bullshit. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/119566/anybody-know-how-to-get-podcasts-sorted-correctly-on-a-zune-closed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Look, I can't use my zune without a windows machine and the zune software.  So, two out of three of the components are PC related.  If we're talking about moving files from the machine to the device, it involves all three.  Saying my question is not computer related is just a joke.  Seriously?  Really?  Not computer related?  I wish it was; it would probably be much easier to deal with, as I wouldn't be stuck trying to get sorting between disk, software and player correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the question isn't hardware related with zunes then the question is computer related.  Official ruling, please.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have clarified the question on SU.  Or should I just abandon it and try again with a new, less ranty, more explanatory question?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1566" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="875" RevisionGUID="8e1e43a7-13e2-460c-a5da-c284703812c5" CreationDate="2010-03-14T16:22:06.653" UserDisplayName="Will" Text="Zune questions getting closed on superuser?" />
  <row Id="1567" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="875" RevisionGUID="8e1e43a7-13e2-460c-a5da-c284703812c5" CreationDate="2010-03-14T16:22:06.653" UserDisplayName="Will" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;&lt;zune&gt;" />
  <row Id="1568" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="875" RevisionGUID="7f164c2f-1247-4a2f-9a4f-b517a4c4d203" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:58.943" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42203/zune-questions-getting-closed-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1569" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="879" RevisionGUID="a990ee80-db03-43eb-bbb0-cdd4914c14fc" CreationDate="2010-03-15T11:10:20.893" UserDisplayName="balpha" Text="I agree with most of them. However, it needs to be checked if [bluescreen] really always refers to a BSOD. It might as well be someone asking for a program to do video matting (bluescreen/greenscreen, you know)." />
  <row Id="1570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="880" RevisionGUID="5f319011-2a30-411d-91a4-c6f0a75fca34" CreationDate="2010-03-17T04:27:17.937" UserDisplayName="George Edison" Text="I disagree with changing karmic to ubuntu-9.10.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it should be the other way around. Most beginners don't memorize version numbers but if you say 'karmic' they think 'Ah! I have that.' " />
  <row Id="1571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="881" RevisionGUID="8af3ade7-1729-4c8e-b205-92d2124b3902" CreationDate="2010-03-17T07:51:25.067" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="Ok, I finished off the xp ones I saw.  I also performed the [windows-vista] and [bittorrent] merges also as I thought those were good ones to do. The [fonts] and [hard-drive] retag's are complete.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You are correct ~quack in that the merge operations simply select a master tag and a tag to remove.  The removed tag is then replaced with the master tag and does not handle special cases.  With the vista tagged questions, I will just remove the [windows] tag where it is not needed as I go through questions.  The generic [windows] needs to stay in place though as some questions simply deal with windows in general terms.  This is where we can use anyone with the appropriate reputation to re-tag questions to properly categorize questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to hear more input on the ubuntu and bsod tags." />
  <row Id="1572" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="878" RevisionGUID="51645827-cef9-4308-8520-a499c60c34db" CreationDate="2010-03-15T09:50:01.080" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="Tags in need of automated retagging:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;strike&gt;[**[xp]**][1] (31) to [**[windows-xp]**][2] (1987)&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;strike&gt;[**[vista]**][3] (57) to [**[windows-vista]**][4] (1239)&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;strike&gt;[**[hdd]**][5] (37) to [**[hard-drive]**][6] (493)&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - [**[bluescreen]**][7] (33) to [**[bsod]**][8] (65) **[*]**&#xD;&#xA; - [**[karmic]**][9] (47) to [**[ubuntu-9.10]**][10] (268)&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;strike&gt;[**[torrent]**][11] (24) to [**[bittorrent]**][12] (60)&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - &lt;strike&gt;[**[font]**][13] (26) to [**[fonts]**][14] (117)&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is part of regular tag maintenance, and we can probably expect most of these tags back eventually.  Tag counts are reasonably current as of right now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[*]:** I don't prefer one over the other.  Tho as balpha [points out][15], *[bsod]* may be the clearer of the two.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Updated:** added **[font]** to the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With regards to the **[xp]** and **[vista]** tags, it's common that these tags are accompanied by the **[windows]** tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - If the **[windows]** tag *preceeds* and *adjoins* the **[xp]** or **[vista]** tag, I assume the proper tagging should be to merge the two tags, not to replace the second tag.&#xD;&#xA;  - I assume the automatic retag just replaces tags and has little capability to handle special requests like the above restriction.&#xD;&#xA;  - For example:&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;Original tags: **[foo] [windows] [xp] [bar]**  &#xD;&#xA;Automatic retag: **[foo] [windows] [windows-xp] [bar]**  &#xD;&#xA;Proper retag: **[foo] [windows-xp] [bar]**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With this in mind, I've retagged **[windows]+[xp]** and **[windows]+[vista]** questions manually, only when they met the requirement in the first bullet point above.  However, if my assumptions are improper, please let me know so I can refrain in the future.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/xp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows-xp&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/vista&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows-vista&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/hdd&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/hard-drive&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/bluescreen&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/bsod&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/karmic&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ubuntu-9.10&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/torrent&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/bittorrent&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/font&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/fonts&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42283/su-retag-request-hdd-bluescreen-karmic-torrent/42290#42290" />
  <row Id="1573" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="878" RevisionGUID="51645827-cef9-4308-8520-a499c60c34db" CreationDate="2010-03-15T09:50:01.080" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="SU retag request: hdd, bluescreen, karmic, torrent, ..." />
  <row Id="1574" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="878" RevisionGUID="51645827-cef9-4308-8520-a499c60c34db" CreationDate="2010-03-15T09:50:01.080" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1575" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="878" RevisionGUID="cc35c4e4-e38f-4479-a6ad-22a9bd1bc994" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:01:59.967" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42283/su-retag-request-hdd-bluescreen-karmic-torrent" Text="" />
  <row Id="1576" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="883" RevisionGUID="27b8bd1c-b54a-4138-831b-6e77d8361e8d" CreationDate="2010-03-15T17:23:04.140" UserDisplayName="Juan Manuel" Text="Works fine for me" />
  <row Id="1577" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="884" RevisionGUID="436aae1e-0da6-4ac0-8088-e845ed4f8738" CreationDate="2010-03-16T00:04:22.113" Text="We can't reproduce this -- and oddly enough I don't see any exceptions in the log for that time period, either." />
  <row Id="1578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="882" RevisionGUID="2e558744-5e09-47e1-bf5e-1f9fbbb789d8" CreationDate="2010-03-15T17:22:22.377" UserDisplayName="user144670" Text="I can't post an answer to the question.&#xD;&#xA;I get *Oops! Something Bad Happened!* page. There is the text from the webpage:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; We apologize for any inconvenience,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; but an unexpected error occurred while&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you were browsing our site.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; It's not you, it's us. This is our&#xD;&#xA;&gt; fault.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Detailed information about this error&#xD;&#xA;&gt; has automatically been recorded and we&#xD;&#xA;&gt; have been notified.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Yes, we do look at every error. We&#xD;&#xA;&gt; even try to fix some of them.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; It's not strictly necessary, but if&#xD;&#xA;&gt; you'd like to give us additional&#xD;&#xA;&gt; information about this error, do so at&#xD;&#xA;&gt; our feedback site,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; meta.stackoverflow.com.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What can I do?" />
  <row Id="1579" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="882" RevisionGUID="2e558744-5e09-47e1-bf5e-1f9fbbb789d8" CreationDate="2010-03-15T17:22:22.377" UserDisplayName="user144670" Text="SuperUser is not allowing me to post an answer" />
  <row Id="1580" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="882" RevisionGUID="2e558744-5e09-47e1-bf5e-1f9fbbb789d8" CreationDate="2010-03-15T17:22:22.377" UserDisplayName="user144670" Text="&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="1581" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="882" RevisionGUID="55b8a0a3-f07d-499b-a6a2-9d493eb7d9db" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:00.903" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42302/superuser-is-not-allowing-me-to-post-an-answer" Text="" />
  <row Id="1582" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="886" RevisionGUID="fe100251-a58a-4d2d-aebb-e107db8f6e8c" CreationDate="2010-03-17T08:44:01.110" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="I would support this change.  Off-topic would include gaming questions IMO.  I will also support anything to reduce the size of the close window in any logical way. I vote to remove the gaming close reason." />
  <row Id="1583" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="885" RevisionGUID="45b54b41-0fac-4ccf-9530-c0357a3154e9" CreationDate="2010-03-16T09:19:09.370" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="Due to [this question][1], the close reason on Super User `not computer related` has been replaced with `off-topic` now:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![close reasons][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is much better than it used to be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But isn't the close reason `gaming` a dupe of that now? `Gaming` is also considered `off-topic` by the [faq][3]. I'd vote to remove the `gaming` close-reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39523/terminology-issue-of-computer-related-questions&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imageuploading.com/ims/pic.php?u=19720qFeUy&amp;i=122378&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/faq" />
  <row Id="1584" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="885" RevisionGUID="45b54b41-0fac-4ccf-9530-c0357a3154e9" CreationDate="2010-03-16T09:19:09.370" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="Isn't the close reason &quot;gaming&quot; a dupe of &quot;off-topic&quot; on Super User?" />
  <row Id="1585" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="885" RevisionGUID="45b54b41-0fac-4ccf-9530-c0357a3154e9" CreationDate="2010-03-16T09:19:09.370" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;close-reasons&gt;" />
  <row Id="1586" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="885" RevisionGUID="b5cb9dfb-fe25-4f16-8cc1-91ded4918751" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:01.280" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42376/isnt-the-close-reason-gaming-a-dupe-of-off-topic-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1587" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="888" RevisionGUID="b221cb98-b9aa-43b3-aa95-7f3dcb153308" CreationDate="2010-03-16T19:55:38.513" UserDisplayName="Tim Post" Text="`Chrome` when discussing browsers is not at all exclusive to Google. Unfortunately, you were down voted twice without explanation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Browser Chrome][1] refers to the design and functionality of the browser itself, as it presents itself to the user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Google Chrome][2] is a brand that suggests a better browsing experience by its namesake.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While I use Google Chrome as my browser, I can only suggest that 'better, faster, etc' remain entirely subjective. The word (hence tag) 'chrome' was around prior to Google releasing a web browser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You gotta keep em separated :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.answers.com/topic/browser-chrome&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.google.com/chrome" />
  <row Id="1588" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="889" RevisionGUID="fcc62cb0-fa33-4cae-a2c7-f4c132476e51" CreationDate="2010-04-07T21:42:45.340" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="I've just looked this over again; after Lance's retagging, there were only two questions left in the **[chrome]** tag.  One was about the [*browser-chrome* concept][1]; one was about the [*Windows* UI][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There were also six *new* questions tagged **[chrome]** which all needed the **[google-chrome]** tag instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've retagged the first two with **[ui]** instead of the confusing **[chrome]**, and merged the others into **[google-chrome]**.  The tag autocomplete should suggest **[google-chrome]** to those who type &quot;chrome&quot; in manually.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unfortunately this probably won't be the last we'll see of **[chrome]**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/97500/is-there-a-quick-way-to-remove-browser-decorations&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/38687/windows-program-to-remove-titlebar-frame-etc-from-a-window" />
  <row Id="1589" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="887" RevisionGUID="7c2c437f-fc52-41f5-99c0-d8d2c32caf92" CreationDate="2010-03-16T18:58:01.983" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="On SuperUser I'm trying to clean up google tags, and I noticed that there are 266 tagged 'google-chrome' and 58 just 'chrome'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could some please do a batch retag of [`chrome`][1] to [`google-chrome`][2]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**  Since Tim has explained to me the different meaning of chrome, I'll go through all these by hand, so that nothing is tagged inappropriately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit2:**  OK, all done, there was one that needed to stay labeled chrome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged?tagnames=chrome&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged?tagnames=google-chrome" />
  <row Id="1590" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="887" RevisionGUID="7c2c437f-fc52-41f5-99c0-d8d2c32caf92" CreationDate="2010-03-16T18:58:01.983" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="'google-chrome' and 'chrome'" />
  <row Id="1591" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="887" RevisionGUID="7c2c437f-fc52-41f5-99c0-d8d2c32caf92" CreationDate="2010-03-16T18:58:01.983" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1592" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="887" RevisionGUID="b45824bb-a9ba-4443-8699-d69e3dc1201d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:44.120" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42450/google-chrome-and-chrome" Text="" />
  <row Id="1593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="891" RevisionGUID="256974d7-68ce-4e3c-bd5e-8220e542f994" CreationDate="2010-03-17T03:40:20.593" UserDisplayName="random" Text="They're all done. For now. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Until next time!" />
  <row Id="1594" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="890" RevisionGUID="7770d582-b9e4-4475-abef-b73629d36c05" CreationDate="2010-03-17T01:37:47.413" UserDisplayName="MrStatic" Text="Over on Super User the grass keeps needing a trimming. Requesting a retag  on &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [XP][2] × &lt;del&gt;30&lt;/del&gt; &lt;ins&gt;0&lt;/ins&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;to&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Windows-XP][1] × &lt;del&gt;2027&lt;/del&gt; &lt;ins&gt;2,189&lt;/ins&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows-xp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/xp" />
  <row Id="1595" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="890" RevisionGUID="7770d582-b9e4-4475-abef-b73629d36c05" CreationDate="2010-03-17T01:37:47.413" UserDisplayName="MrStatic" Text="Retag request Xp -&gt; Windows-XP on Super User" />
  <row Id="1596" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="890" RevisionGUID="7770d582-b9e4-4475-abef-b73629d36c05" CreationDate="2010-03-17T01:37:47.413" UserDisplayName="MrStatic" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1597" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="890" RevisionGUID="ff52f0e7-7422-4dc5-91cd-7c4c9d437627" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:45.100" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42493/retag-request-xp-windows-xp-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="893" RevisionGUID="853bf07c-5391-4420-a2f3-586fa65c7c49" CreationDate="2010-03-17T10:50:32.273" UserDisplayName="Tim Post" Text="That is, after all, the name of the distro. " />
  <row Id="1599" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="894" RevisionGUID="4f46154e-f1e8-4425-a2b8-35e3cea0faa2" CreationDate="2010-03-17T10:52:28.743" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Damn is at best a mild profanity.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At worse, you're being redundant with DSL-Linux.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it's called Damn Small Linux, tag it **[damn-small-linux]** and move on." />
  <row Id="1600" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="892" RevisionGUID="eca1e14a-6753-464c-bfb8-2fc796a0414b" CreationDate="2010-03-17T10:42:17.610" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="Someone posted [this question][1] on Damn Small Linux and tagged it **[dsl]**.  Once I figured out *why*, I checked the [other **[dsl]** questions][2] and found [another][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since there were only two, I retagged manually.  There doesn't seem to be a distribution-specific tag for Damn Small Linux, so I had to create one (or remove the tag).  My gut inclination was to tag them with **[damn-small-linux]**, which is correct, but ... well, impolite.  I ended up creating the tag [**[dsl-linux]**][4] instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Considering the existing [**[language-that-shall-not-be-named]**][5] tag on SO, should we throw propriety to the wind, and go ahead and use the full **[damn-small-linux]**?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/120912/defualt-root-pass&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/dsl&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/111549/few-question-about-linux-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/dsl-linux&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/brainfuck" />
  <row Id="1601" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="892" RevisionGUID="eca1e14a-6753-464c-bfb8-2fc796a0414b" CreationDate="2010-03-17T10:42:17.610" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="SU tags: recommend better tag for DSL (the linux distribution)" />
  <row Id="1602" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="892" RevisionGUID="eca1e14a-6753-464c-bfb8-2fc796a0414b" CreationDate="2010-03-17T10:42:17.610" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="1603" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="892" RevisionGUID="70aba109-4f7d-4f8e-9eec-ed06a4496fd8" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:45.327" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42521/su-tags-recommend-better-tag-for-dsl-the-linux-distribution" Text="" />
  <row Id="1604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="896" RevisionGUID="fe53f3e7-8177-4c4e-960f-919915215745" CreationDate="2010-03-22T07:56:25.850" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="Yes, ​​​​​​please​​!" />
  <row Id="1605" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="896" RevisionGUID="fe53f3e7-8177-4c4e-960f-919915215745" CreationDate="2010-03-22T07:56:25.850" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="897" RevisionGUID="99ac2c6c-8941-4e53-89ce-aba00448bf39" CreationDate="2010-03-22T07:56:35.477" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="**Yes!** He'd make an excellent moderator! He's the most prolific editor on Super User (and quite possibly Meta Stack Overflow), he's gone the extra mile to keep the site clean and he's a level-headed guy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd fully support him if he were elected as moderator. It might even help me become active again on Super User if I knew there was a moderator such as him helping out the community.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1607" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="897" RevisionGUID="99ac2c6c-8941-4e53-89ce-aba00448bf39" CreationDate="2010-03-22T07:56:35.477" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1608" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="898" RevisionGUID="f6cc3b4d-d987-4342-a130-017b6b4d08aa" CreationDate="2010-03-22T15:39:24.637" UserDisplayName="Pollyanna" Text="Random is a stand up guy, and will do very, very well.  " />
  <row Id="1609" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="898" RevisionGUID="f6cc3b4d-d987-4342-a130-017b6b4d08aa" CreationDate="2010-03-22T15:39:24.637" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1610" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="899" RevisionGUID="2d529e40-1ce8-4564-825b-8f77b79a3d92" CreationDate="2010-03-22T15:53:33.663" UserDisplayName="Juan Manuel" Text="**No!** I would not like that, I would prefer to lose another 2K reputation points in a new recalc, the world would be a far worse place should this be approved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;Actually, I **do** agree with making him a moderator, but I provide this answer for people to upvote it if they disagree, as it doesn't exist yet&lt;/sub&gt;" />
  <row Id="1611" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="899" RevisionGUID="2d529e40-1ce8-4564-825b-8f77b79a3d92" CreationDate="2010-03-22T15:53:33.663" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="900" RevisionGUID="6ec1a306-78a3-4385-a72a-2d6a5e8a11cf" CreationDate="2010-03-22T15:57:56.860" UserDisplayName="Ether" Text="Yes, but there should be an election (including a call for nominations) rather than an ad-hoc appointment with no announcement.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1613" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="900" RevisionGUID="6ec1a306-78a3-4385-a72a-2d6a5e8a11cf" CreationDate="2010-03-22T15:57:56.860" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1614" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="901" RevisionGUID="e8f80dd6-73f4-44a6-92e4-64f88d404f23" CreationDate="2010-03-22T16:18:38.410" UserDisplayName="Pollyanna" Text="&gt; Should Random be elected a moderator on Super User?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Sources say...][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~ssanty/cgi-bin/eightball.cgi?submit=Submit+Question&amp;query=Should+Random+be+elected+a+moderator+on+Super+User" />
  <row Id="1615" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="901" RevisionGUID="e8f80dd6-73f4-44a6-92e4-64f88d404f23" CreationDate="2010-03-22T16:18:38.410" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1616" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="902" RevisionGUID="7313ff16-99d4-4ea4-803c-e8228f380a49" CreationDate="2010-03-22T16:20:56.643" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="I think that easily 75% of closed questions on SU contain &quot;Eight days of Malaise&quot; in the people voting, and he is most of times the first to notice them and vote.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions badly asked usually have 10 seconds of existence, before he edits them to make them smell as good as waffles with whipped cream.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He is also not only clicking, but as well explaining, commenting and teaching users why such question should be improved, or why closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So really, **yes**, for sure yes, he should be a moderator on Super User. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;On Meta, though, that can mean only the [universe slowly collapsing over itself][1].&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/46453/is-this-the-way-a-moderator-should-handle-questions" />
  <row Id="1617" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="902" RevisionGUID="7313ff16-99d4-4ea4-803c-e8228f380a49" CreationDate="2010-03-22T16:20:56.643" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="903" RevisionGUID="ff55b17c-32d1-47ef-9f90-1ff09b64885d" CreationDate="2010-03-22T22:59:21.877" UserDisplayName="Troggy" Text="Random has been very helpful on SU and he would be one of my first choices for moderator additions.  ~quack would also get my approval. There are a few others that have proved themselves to be very helpful on SU, but those are the top two I have noticed lately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Core to this approval is not only flagging and editing questions, it is helping users understand why things happen or point them to the information they need.  When certain questions get closed or other various site &quot;features&quot;, these guys have helped people in a positive way. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On top of that, they have been very helpful finding duplicates, helping identify questions that can be merged, and pointing out places where moderator actions are needed.  They have helped make moderator tasks much easier. Random was also very helpful when the SU rules were tightened in finding older questions and content that needed to be cleaned up or closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;He has my endorsement.  If people would rather vote for a new mod, I say let the people decide. From the response here, it sounds like random would be a top choice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This message is Troggy approved and keep flagging away! " />
  <row Id="1619" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="903" RevisionGUID="ff55b17c-32d1-47ef-9f90-1ff09b64885d" CreationDate="2010-03-22T22:59:21.877" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1620" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="895" RevisionGUID="42fd949c-a65b-4d3a-a194-f8cea4751f6b" CreationDate="2010-03-22T07:53:46.307" Text="Random is very, very helpful on [Super User][1] (and of course [Meta Stack Overflow][2]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not that other users aren't, but Random goes the extra mile, and *then some*. He is often so far in the distance that I can barely see him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should Random be &lt;s&gt;penalized&lt;/s&gt;rewarded for this long-term pattern of helpfulness by being elected a Super User moderator? I realize this is sort of ad-hoc, but I wanted to get the community's opinion on this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://superuser.com/users/307/eight-days-of-malaise&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/users/9314/random&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1621" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="895" RevisionGUID="42fd949c-a65b-4d3a-a194-f8cea4751f6b" CreationDate="2010-03-22T07:53:46.307" Text="Should Random be elected a moderator on Super User?" />
  <row Id="1622" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="895" RevisionGUID="42fd949c-a65b-4d3a-a194-f8cea4751f6b" CreationDate="2010-03-22T07:53:46.307" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;moderators&gt;&lt;election&gt;" />
  <row Id="1623" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="895" RevisionGUID="42fd949c-a65b-4d3a-a194-f8cea4751f6b" CreationDate="2010-03-22T07:53:46.307" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1624" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="895" RevisionGUID="4856d1ec-e996-4dae-839a-a06ef480a4de" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:45.663" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/43378/should-random-be-elected-a-moderator-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="904" RevisionGUID="be3ab2b3-e59c-4133-9e95-136cc32717a4" CreationDate="2010-03-23T05:27:51.147" UserDisplayName="bignose" Text="On `superuser.com`, like others in the trilogy, we can mark up text in monospace. The default style on `superuser.com`, though, has very little to distinguish it from surrounding text: the font is different but the colours are identical. On a site that very often discusses commands in the middle of prose text, it seems important to have **monospace text styled to be distinct as on other trilogy sites**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A different-shaded background would be enough, but I leave it to the expert web monkeys to choose something appropriate.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1626" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="904" RevisionGUID="be3ab2b3-e59c-4133-9e95-136cc32717a4" CreationDate="2010-03-23T05:27:51.147" UserDisplayName="bignose" Text="Style for monospace is not distinctive enough on superuser.com." />
  <row Id="1627" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="904" RevisionGUID="be3ab2b3-e59c-4133-9e95-136cc32717a4" CreationDate="2010-03-23T05:27:51.147" UserDisplayName="bignose" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;user-interface&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;design&gt;" />
  <row Id="1628" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="904" RevisionGUID="3125bd64-a61d-48d3-80af-9c3d5eca6e23" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:47.940" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/43652/style-for-monospace-is-not-distinctive-enough-on-superuser-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="1629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="906" RevisionGUID="cc834f93-b250-45d7-9b07-8b5ae30b34c9" CreationDate="2010-03-23T18:15:17.773" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="It was locked due to the spam it generated. There are currently a few deleted answers which were simply Thank You or Me Too. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;High view questions that generate a lot of spam are locked periodically to ease the pressure a bit. This is done only on SU since some questions get a lot of views due to the topic being extremely popular for a period of time and they tend to attract a lot of spam answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have unlocked the question again." />
  <row Id="1630" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="906" RevisionGUID="cc834f93-b250-45d7-9b07-8b5ae30b34c9" CreationDate="2010-03-23T18:15:17.773" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1631" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="905" RevisionGUID="21a1a862-8adb-4cd0-93b8-cb01ce864807" CreationDate="2010-03-23T18:05:59.257" UserDisplayName="dggoldst" Text="After solving a puzzling problem with my new computer, I posted the issue on SuperUser.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://superuser.com/questions/72445/how-to-get-an-acer-aspire-revo-to-connect-to-the-wireless-keyboard-and-mouse&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As [recommended][1] , I answered my own question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question turned out to be popular (1k views), three people upvoted the answer I gave.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Today I returned to the question to find it locked. Searching on meta for locked questions, I cannot figure out why it is locked. There:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Were no negative reactions to the question&#xD;&#xA;- Was no excessive editing (I'm not sure if it was edited at all)&#xD;&#xA;- Was no history of closing or flagging the question&#xD;&#xA;- Was no gaming of the system (I wasn't responsible for the 1k views)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anyone have an idea of what the problem might be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/12513/should-i-answer-my-own-question-or-not" />
  <row Id="1632" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="905" RevisionGUID="21a1a862-8adb-4cd0-93b8-cb01ce864807" CreationDate="2010-03-23T18:05:59.257" UserDisplayName="dggoldst" Text="Why did this question get locked on Super User?" />
  <row Id="1633" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="905" RevisionGUID="21a1a862-8adb-4cd0-93b8-cb01ce864807" CreationDate="2010-03-23T18:05:59.257" UserDisplayName="dggoldst" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;locked&gt;" />
  <row Id="1634" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="905" RevisionGUID="08d2ce71-effb-4ef0-96d3-df616cdf1b4d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:48.220" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/43696/why-did-this-question-get-locked-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="908" RevisionGUID="4bc56fa8-bdc3-4d3d-ade3-d196d8058194" CreationDate="2010-03-24T01:08:56.080" UserDisplayName="random" Text="That's a website support question. Ruling it **out.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just because it's about support for computer parts doesn't skate the fact that yes, this is essentially, &quot;Are there tricks for this site?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="909" RevisionGUID="e919d692-db0d-478a-9491-09a3673a59ca" CreationDate="2010-03-24T01:09:17.390" UserDisplayName="waiwai933" Text="Interesting question. I'm inclined to say *no*, but I'm not active enough in SU to be able to make that judgement. However, I don't think SU is suitable, because  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Techincally, it could be interpreted as a web application. (Yes, I know this is a poor argument)&#xD;&#xA;2. The manufacturer's support web site would probably be a better place, even if the question is about that very web site. *(META)!*" />
  <row Id="1637" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="910" RevisionGUID="b7d238b8-ae46-4f43-9b15-539113cb99ca" CreationDate="2010-03-24T01:18:49.570" UserDisplayName="Pekka" Text="I'm also not active enough on Super User to make any kind of judgement, but my 2 cents: I would definitely rule it in because it is a useful resource in terms of the area that Super User is meant to cover: Hardware and Software support. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is beneficial for Super User as a whole in that it provides a resource that pre-empts questions that would be (rightly or wrongly) treated as valid ones (&quot;I reinstalled my xyz laptop, but now the abc doesn't work anymore. What do I need to download?&quot;) it would also be a great linking target in case such questions come up." />
  <row Id="1638" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="911" RevisionGUID="7b3990d0-cbc5-40d3-8f4f-3faa93497ae4" CreationDate="2010-03-24T01:36:31.930" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="We've had quite a lot of debate about Super User and the website-questions-policy.  Here are two of the more major threads:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [High reputation users having trouble understanding Super User?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/38391/high-reputation-users-having-trouble-understanding-super-user)&#xD;&#xA; - [Superuser website applications policy](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39615/superuser-website-applications-policy)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's the basis of current policy, so start there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Is it fair to ask a question at Super User about how to most efficiently access support resources (e.g. drivers, BIOS updates, tools, manuals) from a computer manufacturer's web site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, it's fair *to ask*.  But if the question is more about *how to use the manufacturer's website* than *supporting the hardware*, it may fall afoul of the website policy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Resolving this is simple: don't ask how to use the manufacturer's website; ask how to fix the problem hardware.  (Or software.  Whatever.)" />
  <row Id="1639" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="911" RevisionGUID="7b3990d0-cbc5-40d3-8f4f-3faa93497ae4" CreationDate="2010-03-24T01:36:31.930" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="907" RevisionGUID="64fd0943-396a-4e7e-bf9e-a86dad9efc11" CreationDate="2010-03-24T00:54:32.250" UserDisplayName="Chris W. Rea" Text="Is the following question on- or off-topic for Super User:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/123357/service-tag-urls&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I choose to interpret the FAQ liberally, and the question as I see it **does** relate to computer hardware and software: it's asking about computer manufacturer support resources.  When I have a problem with my computer hardware, that's the first place I go *then* Super User.  (Well actually - we go to Google first!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;@Josh K, in his comments at the question above, quotes the FAQ and points to other [meta][1] [questions][2] that seem to be talking about *web applications*.  I don't think that's the case here.  So:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is it fair to ask a question at Super User about how to most efficiently access support resources (e.g. drivers, BIOS updates, tools, manuals) from a computer manufacturer's web site?**  Many super users are de-facto support personnel for family and friends.  Wouldn't it be handy to have shortcuts to computer manufacturer resources for specific service tags?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We're on a slippery slope if any question about a web site is a target for closure.  I think the &gt;3000 community ought to be more liberal in interpretation of the FAQ when a question clearly has some on-topic content and merit.  The FAQ is *necessarily* terse and therefore vague because nobody wants it to be a 500+ page document with law-like precision.  I don't believe the FAQ is terse to justify strict interpretation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*p.s. I'd have counted myself in that &gt;3000 community but my rep got nerfed after the recent recalc. :-(*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/43639/off-topic-questions-on-super-user-some-give-and-take-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39615/superuser-website-applications-policy" />
  <row Id="1641" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="907" RevisionGUID="64fd0943-396a-4e7e-bf9e-a86dad9efc11" CreationDate="2010-03-24T00:54:32.250" UserDisplayName="Chris W. Rea" Text="Super User question about manufacturer support web site resources: on or off topic?" />
  <row Id="1642" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="907" RevisionGUID="64fd0943-396a-4e7e-bf9e-a86dad9efc11" CreationDate="2010-03-24T00:54:32.250" UserDisplayName="Chris W. Rea" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;" />
  <row Id="1643" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="907" RevisionGUID="c25fd01c-1926-47da-a100-3f2a3611c00f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:48.610" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/43741/super-user-question-about-manufacturer-support-web-site-resources-on-or-off-topi" Text="" />
  <row Id="1644" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="913" RevisionGUID="dfb2de37-13b7-4f82-b7ff-6627418d2226" CreationDate="2010-03-24T19:03:58.057" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="It's a good question.  We also have a [**[wlan]**][1] (20) tag, and [**[wifi]**][2] (219).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the wired side, we have something similar:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [**[ethernet]**][3] (68)&#xD;&#xA; - [**[lan]**][4] (81)&#xD;&#xA; - [**[wan]**][5] (2)&#xD;&#xA; - [**[network]**][6] (226)&#xD;&#xA; - [**[networking]**][7] (673)&#xD;&#xA; - [**[home-networking]**][8] (156)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My first thought is that you've asked for a good change.  But, I like having separate tags for the *concept* ([networking]) and the *thing* ([network] or [lan] or [wan]), and I don't see any reason not to do the same thing on the wireless side.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, at the very least this is a good opportunity to discuss, and keep our tags somewhat consistent.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - *Should* we get rid of the [network] and [wireless-network] tags and move them into [networking] and [wireless-networking]?&#xD;&#xA; - Should we take care to replace them with [lan], [wan], or [wlan] where appropriate?  (Or should we simply fold those into the [*networking] tags as well?)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/wlan&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/wifi&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ethernet&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/lan&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/wan&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/network&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/networking&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/home-networking" />
  <row Id="1645" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="913" RevisionGUID="dfb2de37-13b7-4f82-b7ff-6627418d2226" CreationDate="2010-03-24T19:03:58.057" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="914" RevisionGUID="8dff9dfb-7ad8-484a-9403-f6c54975649b" CreationDate="2010-04-15T06:25:47.850" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="I've gone ahead and done this merge.  The various network-related tags on SU are still a huge ugly nightmare, but at the moment I'm not coming up with a good idea for a clean fix.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to split [wireless-networking] into [wireless] and [networking], but that will mean lots of manual retagging.  Before undertaking that, I'd like to have a clear concept of what networking tags should be in use." />
  <row Id="1647" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="912" RevisionGUID="91b61804-9501-41dd-8c99-ffa821f06f1d" CreationDate="2010-03-24T17:26:23.737" UserDisplayName="heavyd" Text="Retag [wireless-network(28)][1] to [wireless-networking(349)][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, there is also the more general [wireless(222)][3], but this one may not be an exact match on all questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/wireless-network&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/wireless-network&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/wireless" />
  <row Id="1648" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="912" RevisionGUID="91b61804-9501-41dd-8c99-ffa821f06f1d" CreationDate="2010-03-24T17:26:23.737" UserDisplayName="heavyd" Text="SU retag request: [wireless-network] --&gt; [wireless-networking]" />
  <row Id="1649" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="912" RevisionGUID="91b61804-9501-41dd-8c99-ffa821f06f1d" CreationDate="2010-03-24T17:26:23.737" UserDisplayName="heavyd" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1650" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="912" RevisionGUID="31be28c9-9cae-412c-991b-285c9ca7fd15" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:49.253" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/43828/su-retag-request-wireless-network-wireless-networking" Text="" />
  <row Id="1651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="916" RevisionGUID="92cbc10e-101a-4bc2-b49f-22930b5f1622" CreationDate="2010-03-27T18:06:19.667" UserDisplayName="George Stocker" Text="Ultimately what should happen is that an answer should be created that is the sum total of everything that has been posted; and that answer should be marked as the Accepted answer. That way if someone has something new, they add it to the accepted answer, instead of having pages and pages of new answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding @Jonik's &quot;Mess&quot; Comment:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not true, [take this for example][1]. If people want to see votes, they can always link the answer in the compiled thread to its place on the thread, just so people can see the votes if they really want to. But if you're collecting information, it's superfluous.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Using the Stack Overflow engine for polls fails.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It shouldn't be used for Polls. Here's why:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Anytime anyone votes for more than one (but not all) they skew the poll. &quot;Your Favorite&quot; implies they should vote for one, but that doesn't stop anyone from voting for more than one. The poll isn't accurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Anytime anyone games the system by randomly voting up and down certain posts (for whatever reason), the voting is skewed. There's nothing in place to stop that from happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bottom line: If you're using numbers next to a post to indicate worthiness, that's not as accurate as you may think.  Not to mention: What if people are voting it up because it's already voted up?  That's possible (Look at the FGITW syndrome).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/391523/what-are-some-good-free-programming-books/392926#392926" />
  <row Id="1652" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="915" RevisionGUID="a5a4f357-3d9c-4ead-948e-90232f9a8682" CreationDate="2010-03-27T17:23:29.717" UserDisplayName="Jonik" Text="Why is this locked? Should it be unlocked? There is no apparent reason or explanation for locking it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SU: [What are some “must have” Windows programs?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fact that **no new answers can be added** sucks ([see this before saying locking doesn't do that][2]), and will decrease the usefulness of the question over time. (Aren't new Windows programs still being written and released, with some occasionally becoming popular?) &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, unlocking would mean 1) even more duplicate answers (slightly annoying, but those get voted down to the bottom quickly or deleted by observant posters after it's been pointed out), 2) the question might get closed and reopened occasionally, and 3) it might gather some more comments too. Still, all these are much lesser evils compared to stopping the community wiki from fully evolving and keeping up-to-date.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Disclaimer/rant: I know there is a sentiment among some against all these &quot;must-have software&quot; questions, or against CW polls with huge number of answers in general. But in the end of the day, doesn't it weigh more that the community overwhelmingly considers this question **useful**, as attested by its current score of +142 and 198 users having bookmarked it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/1241/what-are-some-must-have-windows-programs&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/36970/please-change-the-name-of-the-lock-feature-to-freeze/38673#38673" />
  <row Id="1653" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="915" RevisionGUID="a5a4f357-3d9c-4ead-948e-90232f9a8682" CreationDate="2010-03-27T17:23:29.717" UserDisplayName="Jonik" Text="Should this popular CW question be unlocked to allow it to evolve?" />
  <row Id="1654" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="915" RevisionGUID="a5a4f357-3d9c-4ead-948e-90232f9a8682" CreationDate="2010-03-27T17:23:29.717" UserDisplayName="Jonik" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;&lt;locked&gt;" />
  <row Id="1655" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="915" RevisionGUID="806e03b2-67cc-4752-9170-369e7074d586" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:49.470" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/44275/should-this-popular-cw-question-be-unlocked-to-allow-it-to-evolve" Text="" />
  <row Id="1656" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="918" RevisionGUID="612cfdb7-c391-48d5-b1f6-e6a1beb7cc1c" CreationDate="2010-03-29T14:44:08.393" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="Actually, I would say that the second half of your question (&quot;I could use Publisher&quot;) is matching to the duplicate, and this is probably why it got closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, the rest seems quite specific, and more than just asking for a Publisher alternative.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my opinion, this could be reopened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, remember that moderators are humans too (aside from random, who is obviously a unicorn on a sugar rush), and as such, can easily make mistakes. Don't hesitate in such case to edit your question with more details, and/or simply flag your own question for moderator attention, for a second opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess there is no need for a meta post for each closed question, such thing can be settled directly, without a &quot;call for reopen votes&quot;." />
  <row Id="1657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="919" RevisionGUID="420970a6-7916-474f-ada1-b4d5fa1f26f6" CreationDate="2010-03-29T14:51:13.773" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Yes, you're correct, that was a bad call.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Instead it should have been closed as a dupe of [Looking for software to facilitate printing of online content](http://superuser.com/questions/21541/looking-for-software-to-facilitate-printing-of-online-content). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But then that one does mention wanting web-based software. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Flip switch&#xD;&#xA;Dupe has been swapped and the annotation left as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Dupe close because while the newer one is of extremely similar premise, it does not cover just web-based software, which is outside the scope of SU." />
  <row Id="1658" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="917" RevisionGUID="97e8ca1a-bff6-40b9-882f-32cef5df8c29" CreationDate="2010-03-29T14:37:22.200" UserDisplayName="Vaccano" Text="I posted this question yesterday evening:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/125222/good-software-to-take-a-blog-and-format-it-for-printing-closed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is a question looking for a software tool that will take a blog and format it for printing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This morning I checked on it and found it had been closed as an exact duplicate for this question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/7425/what-is-a-good-alternative-to-publisher-for-desktop-publishing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is a question looking for a desktop publishing tool.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While it is true that both questions refer to Publisher in some way, I don't see that my question is answered (or asked for that matter) in the &quot;first post&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any chance I can get some re-open votes from Meta users?  (Or a good explanation as to how my question is answered by the &quot;first question&quot;.)" />
  <row Id="1659" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="917" RevisionGUID="97e8ca1a-bff6-40b9-882f-32cef5df8c29" CreationDate="2010-03-29T14:37:22.200" UserDisplayName="Vaccano" Text="SU question closed as Exact Duplicate, but it does not seem to be the same to me." />
  <row Id="1660" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="917" RevisionGUID="97e8ca1a-bff6-40b9-882f-32cef5df8c29" CreationDate="2010-03-29T14:37:22.200" UserDisplayName="Vaccano" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;support&gt;&lt;vote-to-reopen&gt;" />
  <row Id="1661" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="917" RevisionGUID="1eb8819e-dad3-463e-8f0c-428f6a1e41a1" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:50.253" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/44433/su-question-closed-as-exact-duplicate-but-it-does-not-seem-to-be-the-same-to-me" Text="" />
  <row Id="1662" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="921" RevisionGUID="d6eb7045-1cde-4d8c-a66c-27b4f601563c" CreationDate="2010-03-30T08:17:52.043" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="The problem I have is that it stretches the grey area we have on web-related questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If we give them an inch and they'll want a mile next. Claiming that if we allow your  question, theirs should be allowed as well. Only because they had a different shade of grey...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes you do control the server, but how is that different from me controlling WordPress on a hosted server somewhere? I still get to pull some strings to change whatever I want (if I knew how!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your problem is that (at the moment) there isn't another Stack Exchange site, specifically for these kind of questions. While I'd love to answer these kind of questions and even have some of them myself, I don't think these questions should clutter Super User any further." />
  <row Id="1663" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="920" RevisionGUID="54cfb90a-756c-48b4-8387-0e22d950ecde" CreationDate="2010-03-30T08:00:13.957" UserDisplayName="Bozho" Text="I was updating my blog by installing wordpress on a server of mine, and I had [a particular question](http://superuser.com/questions/125453/which-wordpress-plugin-adds-support-for-java-syntax-highlighting-closed).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As it seems, it is not allowed to ask any questions about WordPress [*the software*](http://en.support.wordpress.com/com-vs-org/), since the question was closed twice by two different moderators (Ivo Flipse and random). Let's interpret the FAQ:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * computer software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is definitely about computer software, WordPress in this case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and it is not about …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * videogames or consoles&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&gt;    * electronic devices, media players, cell phones or smart phones, except insofar as they interface with your computer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it is definitely NOT any of those; I was just givin an example of how it is configured on wordpress.com, but nothing else to do with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand one of the most common tags is Gmail (half questions closed, but still).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most questions are operation-systems related. So:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;how do I change my windows theme&quot; would be _allowed_&#xD;&#xA;- &quot;how to change my wordpress (installed on my machine) theme&quot; would be _closed_&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This hardly makes sense to me, and it appears that too many questions are being closed on Super User for allegedly being offtopic. This is definitely not welcoming for users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What could be done?  Well, don't close so many questions, and make clearer definition of what cannot be asked; let's say &quot;Everything that is on a computer of yours and is configurable by you is a proper subject to ask about&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** As per Ivo's comment ([linking to Jeff's post][1]) I'd propose explicitly mentioning in the faq that _web_-applications are out of the scope of Super User.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update2:** As limiting the scope via closing questions is not (imo) a good way to achieve &quot;purity&quot;, why not introduce __forbidden tags__. I.e. whenever you tag `wordpress`, the system will pop a message &quot;Wordpress is not allowed, see FAQ&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42373/what-sites-are-currently-missing-from-the-trilogy" />
  <row Id="1664" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="920" RevisionGUID="54cfb90a-756c-48b4-8387-0e22d950ecde" CreationDate="2010-03-30T08:00:13.957" UserDisplayName="Bozho" Text="Questions about WordPress on Super User" />
  <row Id="1665" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="920" RevisionGUID="54cfb90a-756c-48b4-8387-0e22d950ecde" CreationDate="2010-03-30T08:00:13.957" UserDisplayName="Bozho" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;off-topic&gt;" />
  <row Id="1666" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="920" RevisionGUID="7363d7bc-7f1e-47f2-986f-f8cd73e67871" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:51.230" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/44513/questions-about-wordpress-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="923" RevisionGUID="901249c0-f1bf-49d2-b76e-d0741a559660" CreationDate="2010-03-31T03:14:54.923" UserDisplayName="random" Text="If it was just a software installer problem, then it would still be open. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It was also flagged to close with a question on if it was allowed to stay open because it was a PC game. No, that's not a free pass.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is purely about the one game and [games are out][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6542/are-video-game-questions-appropriate-for-superuser &quot;don't forget that it should apply to other apps if it was to stay open&quot;" />
  <row Id="1668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="922" RevisionGUID="da235df8-453d-4522-a5f3-8404d2ff69d7" CreationDate="2010-03-31T03:01:54.363" UserDisplayName="Spiff" Text="I was surprised [this question](http://superuser.com/questions/125931/how-do-i-install-myst-4-revelation-on-os-x-10-6) on Superuser got closed as &quot;out of scope&quot;. Basically the question was, &quot;Why is this software installer crashing on my new OS, when it never crashed on my old OS?&quot;. But apparently because the content of what the problematic installer was installing happened to be a game, the question was closed as out-of-scope.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There was really nothing gaming-specific about this question. It wasn't like &quot;What hardware should I use for gaming?&quot;." />
  <row Id="1669" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="922" RevisionGUID="da235df8-453d-4522-a5f3-8404d2ff69d7" CreationDate="2010-03-31T03:01:54.363" UserDisplayName="Spiff" Text="Shouldn't software installer problems be in-scope on SU even if the software happens to be a game?" />
  <row Id="1670" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="922" RevisionGUID="da235df8-453d-4522-a5f3-8404d2ff69d7" CreationDate="2010-03-31T03:01:54.363" UserDisplayName="Spiff" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;gaming&gt;&lt;scope&gt;" />
  <row Id="1671" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="922" RevisionGUID="bbbbcdf2-f239-43e5-bc2f-cdafe14b1e05" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:52.070" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/44631/shouldnt-software-installer-problems-be-in-scope-on-su-even-if-the-software-happ" Text="" />
  <row Id="1672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="925" RevisionGUID="c1ac2d9d-86a4-48c5-bd91-900afe8ce0f8" CreationDate="2010-03-31T10:45:06.120" Text="We do have a global blacklist and anything extra-egregious goes on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you feel a term (typically, URLs are best) is occuring in evil/spam posts enough to warrant inclusion on the blacklist, please email to team@superuser.com (or the appropriate team@site email).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is something one of the developers has to do at the moment, because the global blacklist is really dangerous if you get it wrong.. like, if, say, you accidentally added a bad regex to it that blocks a common word.." />
  <row Id="1673" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="926" RevisionGUID="271cb678-da2b-4597-83dc-f51e3fc39c7d" CreationDate="2010-03-31T12:32:09.603" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Witness, the horror that is a question set up specifically for the spammers to talk to each other:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[![super spammers][1]][2] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mods do go about deleting these, but it's also good if the community flags anything they think might be spam to help the process.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/5Qgmd.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/95685/windows-7-administrator-password/ &quot;a present for when 10k&quot;" />
  <row Id="1674" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="924" RevisionGUID="a258eed9-24e7-49b9-8161-f3f451cdb4e7" CreationDate="2010-03-31T09:29:33.867" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="This morning came an advertising user for some password recovery products for Windows. It was obvious spam, and was reported as such, and deleted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, [searching for their &quot;product&quot;][1] shows that this is something frequent, that they are coming back often with anonymous accounts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could we have a massive cleaning from moderators of the existing ones?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there something else to do about it, since it seems recurring and not all of them are seen on time?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** Ok, it seems that it was cleaned each time, but the google search is not up to date, simply, as most of the links on it direct to deleted answers. The question about the recurring effect stays, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.google.fr/search?q=site%3Asuperuser.com++%22Windows+Password+Key%22&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1675" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="924" RevisionGUID="a258eed9-24e7-49b9-8161-f3f451cdb4e7" CreationDate="2010-03-31T09:29:33.867" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="Request: cleaning Super User from a particular spam for password recovery tools" />
  <row Id="1676" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="924" RevisionGUID="a258eed9-24e7-49b9-8161-f3f451cdb4e7" CreationDate="2010-03-31T09:29:33.867" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;spam&gt;" />
  <row Id="1677" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="924" RevisionGUID="1a5ed5b7-5eff-498c-b6c9-dbde4af50bd5" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:52.440" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/44657/request-cleaning-super-user-from-a-particular-spam-for-password-recovery-tools" Text="" />
  <row Id="1678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="928" RevisionGUID="87035fe3-f302-43cb-bd00-c269495c3510" CreationDate="2010-04-04T15:32:12.520" UserDisplayName="Douglas Leeder" Text="Perhaps we can ask our own 'Jeopardy' style question, which a suitable vague title, and a content that makes it clear the question applies generally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The answers could give advice for different performance levels of computers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Obviously this approach would have to be agreed with the moderators or else the question would rapidly be closed as duplicate..." />
  <row Id="1679" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="929" RevisionGUID="86c0be11-cfce-4a9e-a021-14a957d1c066" CreationDate="2010-04-04T15:36:35.287" UserDisplayName="random" Text="We could try and emulate the somewhat tame beast that is the [Free antivirus solutions for Windows][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each answer to the question would list one distro with specs at a minimum on what it takes to run listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ##Poncho Linux&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ###Minimum requirements  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Processor: Pentium III, 1GHz  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; RAM: 256MB&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or reverse it and have minimum specs listed as the lead with the answer fleshed out with a list of suitable distros.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ##Processor: Pentium III, 1GHz &#xD;&#xA;&gt; ###256MB RAM&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Poncho Linux (10MB free)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Breadbasket (15MB free)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ###512MB RAM&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Tyrell Flavour Linux (30MB)&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - Not your pappy's linux (20MB)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Who knows.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/2/free-antivirus-solutions-for-windows &quot;du la planc&quot;" />
  <row Id="1680" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="930" RevisionGUID="6fef990a-51ca-4790-843f-5969de19f105" CreationDate="2010-04-18T08:46:04.433" UserDisplayName="Douglas Leeder" Text="So I'll make another proposal - a synthesis of existing proposals.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A community wiki question, following the lead of '[What to do if my computer is infected by a virus or a malware?][1]'. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;&quot;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;Which Linux Distribution should I use?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*This question is coming back often, in slightly different forms, so this faq attempts to provide the composite answer.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I want to try Linux on my computer, which distribution should I use?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a current machine and want an easy to use distribution: links to answers - including Ubuntu :-)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a 2004 era machine (Pentium 4, 1GiB memory): links to answers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a 2000 era machine (Pentium 3, 256 MiB memory): links to answers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I want a distribution using cutting edge/bleeding edge programs: links to answers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*As it is community wiki, feel free to edit this question to improve it as well.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;&quot;&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Each answer would be a single distribution, with minimum requirements, links to the distribution vendor, and any highlights. Historical version minimum requirements could be included, where the versions are still supported.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/100360/what-to-do-if-my-computer-is-infected-by-a-virus-or-a-malware" />
  <row Id="1681" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="930" RevisionGUID="6fef990a-51ca-4790-843f-5969de19f105" CreationDate="2010-04-18T08:46:04.433" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1682" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="927" RevisionGUID="a3108d26-10c2-4c2d-9b3e-d608c6ecd6a2" CreationDate="2010-04-04T15:11:43.333" UserDisplayName="Douglas Leeder" Text="We have a number of questions on SuperUser, asking which Linux distribution to use on the poster's old PC, and giving specs of said old PC.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A number of these questions have been closed as Duplicate. Which seems reasonable except that the correct answer for a PII/128Mb machine isn't the best answer for a 1GHz P4/1Gb machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As quack quixote [notes][1], we can't leave them separate, or it would be appropriate to close them as too localized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there some better way we could handle these questions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps we need to come up with a good general question, and then redirect all the existing questions to that one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/127037/leightweight-linux-distro-to-install-on-my-old-pc&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/73912/lightweight-gui-linux-distribution-for-really-old-computer&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/64516/suggested-lightweight-linux-distro-to-run-side-by-side-windows&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/57592/best-linux-distro-for-home-usage-closed&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/10067/whats-the-quickest-distro-to-get-up-and-running-with&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/1967/good-linux-distributions-for-newbies&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/132121/easy-linux-distribution-with-newer-packages-than-ubuntu&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/136257/how-to-build-or-find-smallest-linux-with-only-lamp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/127037/leightweight-linux-distro-to-install-on-my-old-pc" />
  <row Id="1683" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="927" RevisionGUID="a3108d26-10c2-4c2d-9b3e-d608c6ecd6a2" CreationDate="2010-04-04T15:11:43.333" UserDisplayName="Douglas Leeder" Text="What to do with &quot;Which Linux Distro for my Old PC&quot; questions of super-user" />
  <row Id="1684" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="927" RevisionGUID="a3108d26-10c2-4c2d-9b3e-d608c6ecd6a2" CreationDate="2010-04-04T15:11:43.333" UserDisplayName="Douglas Leeder" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;linux&gt;" />
  <row Id="1685" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="927" RevisionGUID="2c900de0-360e-4877-b8e2-c3ef88029df9" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:53.013" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/45439/what-to-do-with-which-linux-distro-for-my-old-pc-questions-of-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1686" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="931" RevisionGUID="b8901548-f1d3-44d6-8ca9-900b23d0003a" CreationDate="2010-04-06T16:36:43.253" UserDisplayName="~liori" Text="Hello,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just asked on SuperUser about [&quot;a website to compare software/hardware/electronics&quot;][1]. I was told that questions about webapps are not appropriate for SU... I understand how questions on Facebook can be banned, but I feel that this question is somehow in a gray zone: I am only looking for a recommendation for software for a specific task. If the question was about desktop software, I guess it would be perfectly valid one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, I see that none of the websites mentioned in [the StackExchange sites list][2] cover this (small) piece of &quot;no man's land&quot;. Could you suggest a place to ask this question? Could you also point me to an explanation why all webapps are treated so distinctively?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/128030/a-website-to-compare-software-hardware-electronics&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4/list-of-stackexchange-sites" />
  <row Id="1687" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="931" RevisionGUID="b8901548-f1d3-44d6-8ca9-900b23d0003a" CreationDate="2010-04-06T16:36:43.253" UserDisplayName="~liori" Text="Where to ask about webapp recommendation?" />
  <row Id="1688" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="931" RevisionGUID="b8901548-f1d3-44d6-8ca9-900b23d0003a" CreationDate="2010-04-06T16:36:43.253" UserDisplayName="~liori" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="1689" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="931" RevisionGUID="8ad0bc0c-de80-4ad7-8926-ad3a5cb16f42" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:54.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/45684/where-to-ask-about-webapp-recommendation" Text="" />
  <row Id="1690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="933" RevisionGUID="9a020cce-a5fa-4fc6-9507-ebec235c7316" CreationDate="2010-04-07T13:46:54.450" UserDisplayName="Josh" Text="What is the URL you are taken to which produces the 404?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can edit questions I have posted without any issue..." />
  <row Id="1691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="934" RevisionGUID="41eca701-8140-4863-a9f3-45e14d4070e4" CreationDate="2010-04-07T17:57:28.083" UserDisplayName="Peter Mortensen" Text="It is an intermittent bug, on the order of 5%. It has been like that for 1-2 days.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The work-around is to save the edited content somewhere, go back to the original page, press edit, paste in the saved content and try again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="935" RevisionGUID="769669ce-d83f-49b9-87a5-659cd0570c63" CreationDate="2010-04-08T03:20:22.097" Text="We can't reproduce this." />
  <row Id="1693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="932" RevisionGUID="f15fbfd2-89d4-4adc-a4e1-841ca64be948" CreationDate="2010-04-07T10:32:04.030" UserDisplayName="Ikke" Text="When I try to edit [my question](http://superuser.com/questions/128304/), I get a page not found error.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The error:&#xD;&#xA;![Page not Found](http://ep2up.com/uploads/1270635831.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now it works again. But this wasn't the only error. I've tried to answer my own question, and it gave another error message." />
  <row Id="1694" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="932" RevisionGUID="f15fbfd2-89d4-4adc-a4e1-841ca64be948" CreationDate="2010-04-07T10:32:04.030" UserDisplayName="Ikke" Text="Submitting edit on Super User fails" />
  <row Id="1695" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="932" RevisionGUID="f15fbfd2-89d4-4adc-a4e1-841ca64be948" CreationDate="2010-04-07T10:32:04.030" UserDisplayName="Ikke" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-norepro&gt;&lt;editing&gt;&lt;http-404&gt;" />
  <row Id="1696" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="932" RevisionGUID="1d9998d4-e014-4bf1-8d99-414c79ddc459" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:54.387" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/45757/submitting-edit-on-super-user-fails" Text="" />
  <row Id="1697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="937" RevisionGUID="fe0877c5-12a2-463e-a28f-e5bd363545ab" CreationDate="2010-04-08T05:20:58.433" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="Yes, this is perfectly **legit**." />
  <row Id="1698" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="936" RevisionGUID="f5d53b70-fd99-467e-bdb6-f63e2d3f317b" CreationDate="2010-04-08T05:11:16.367" UserDisplayName="admintech" Text="Just received an email for a free superuser t-shirts, along with a form to fill out. Is this legit?" />
  <row Id="1699" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="936" RevisionGUID="f5d53b70-fd99-467e-bdb6-f63e2d3f317b" CreationDate="2010-04-08T05:11:16.367" UserDisplayName="admintech" Text="Anyone receive an email about a free t-shirt?" />
  <row Id="1700" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="936" RevisionGUID="f5d53b70-fd99-467e-bdb6-f63e2d3f317b" CreationDate="2010-04-08T05:11:16.367" UserDisplayName="admintech" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;t-shirt&gt;" />
  <row Id="1701" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="936" RevisionGUID="f711bba8-26ac-40d9-acff-ae0ef245dac1" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:54.863" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/45891/anyone-receive-an-email-about-a-free-t-shirt" Text="" />
  <row Id="1702" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="939" RevisionGUID="0e0d8ed5-179d-4817-aadf-7613ff493e75" CreationDate="2010-04-08T22:23:59.153" UserDisplayName="Gnome" Text="The full code names are too hard to remember and aren't publicly branded as strongly by Canonical, and people are less aware of even the shorter code names.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's much more prevalent to use a common prefix for OSes, and that makes sense to me.  Should also be easier for users to discover and search for.  (I'd retag the various [jaguar], [tiger], etc. to follow that too.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The LTS releases don't need that in the name, so [ubuntu-8.04] and never -lts.  It's not like there's a non-LTS release of 8.04, and dropping it should be more intuitive for most users." />
  <row Id="1703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="940" RevisionGUID="63d3a453-783e-46b1-bb83-71a991ac77e6" CreationDate="2010-04-08T22:24:55.830" UserDisplayName="heavyd" Text="I am a fan of the current convention.  It is clear, concise and pretty universal.  Personally, when I think in versions numbers and when I see something like *hardy* it makes it difficult for me to actually relate that to a version of the OS, having the numbers in the tags makes it very clear which version is being targeted." />
  <row Id="1704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="941" RevisionGUID="211095ba-c212-4f74-bbff-6e61622b6b53" CreationDate="2010-04-09T03:21:31.617" UserDisplayName="Josh" Text="I say use the version numbers, like [ubuntu-9.10]. I can never remember what the codename is, and I often forget the version. To find the version I just `cat /etc/issue` and there is it. Consistent across linux flavors. I always need google to remind me that `lsb_release -a`  tells me that 9.10 is karmac." />
  <row Id="1705" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="942" RevisionGUID="d9541057-d827-4579-90c7-7c17c140de99" CreationDate="2010-04-09T07:36:21.980" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="Like others said, the current convention it probably the best, as people refer to ubuntu by version numbers, usually (as opposed to debian).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I guess the *ubuntu-codename* (ala debian) could be tolerated, because some people do refer to it like that. Maybe we can add the *ubuntu-version* to these ones, then.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides, I think we should for sure eliminate all tags which are only about the codebase. These ones will get created anyway many times, for the simple reason that many people don't understand how tags work. And they will just type &quot;ubuntu hardy&quot;, which results in two tags. These ones should be renamed for sure. (Like we shouldn't leave &quot;vista&quot; tags alive)" />
  <row Id="1706" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="943" RevisionGUID="5db83ca7-9ba8-425c-a00a-5f2075d59298" CreationDate="2010-05-10T09:10:39.160" UserDisplayName="forget it" Text="The &quot;best&quot; solution for the problem, on the users' side, would probably be to implement &quot;alias tags&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I.e. a set of tags which all have the same meaning:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - when you enter an alias tag as a tag, the system automatically enters instead the one of that set that has been chosen as &quot;master tag&quot;&#xD;&#xA; - when an aliased tag is displayed, either below it (smaller?) or onhover appear the other aliases&#xD;&#xA; - when you search for an aliased tag, all tags of that set are returned, of course&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="938" RevisionGUID="5fd0ccb4-ce0d-4750-81b1-b14a6e8c2913" CreationDate="2010-04-08T22:11:46.953" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="&lt;sub&gt;I know I [promised to open this][1] a long time ago...&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Super User has settled into some ad-hoc, but well-established, conventions for tagging questions about operating systems and their various versions.  This post is to discuss the current conventions used for Ubuntu, and see if any change needs to be made.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, Ubuntu tags use the version number, instead of the release codename.  Codename tags occasionally get recreated and are usually replaced by hand, or occasionally get batch-retagged.  Here's a survey of Ubuntu-related tags in use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Ubuntu**: [canonical]&#xD;&#xA;   - [ubuntu], [kubuntu], [xubuntu]&#xD;&#xA;   - [ubuntu-8.04-lts], [ubuntu-8.10], [ubuntu-9.04], [ubuntu-9.10], [ubuntu-10.04-lts]&#xD;&#xA;   - [ubuntu-server]&#xD;&#xA;   - [ubuntu-netbook-remix]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people seem to prefer the codename tags, so here are the alternate conventions for version-specific tags I can think of.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Version number** &lt;sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;(current convention)&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/sub&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;   - [ubuntu-8.04-lts], [ubuntu-8.10], [ubuntu-9.04], [ubuntu-9.10], [ubuntu-10.04-lts]&#xD;&#xA; - **Short codename** &lt;sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;(occasionally get recreated)&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/sub&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;   - [hardy], [intrepid], [jaunty], [karmic], [lucid]&#xD;&#xA; - **Full codename**:&#xD;&#xA;   - [hardy-heron], [intrepid-ibex], [jaunty-jackalope], [karmic-koala], [lucid-lynx]&#xD;&#xA; - **Short codename, Ubuntu prefix** &lt;sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;(a la Debian)&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/sub&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;   - [ubuntu-hardy], [ubuntu-intrepid], [ubuntu-jaunty], [ubuntu-karmic], [ubuntu-lucid]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My aim is consistency, so that SU doesn't end up with 47 different tags that all mean *&quot;Ubuntu 9.10&quot;*.  I like the current convention, but I don't care which convention is followed.  If the community wants to settle on another convention, batch-retagging the existing questions won't be difficult, and I'll help keep it consistent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For comparison, here's how tags for Windows, OSX and Debian are currently handled:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Microsoft**: [microsoft]&#xD;&#xA;   - [windows]&#xD;&#xA;   - [windows-xp], [windows-vista], [windows-7], ...&#xD;&#xA;   - [windows-server], [windows-server-2003], [windows-server-2008]&#xD;&#xA;   - [windows-xp-embedded]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;` `&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Apple**: [apple], [mac]&#xD;&#xA;   - [osx], [mac-os]&#xD;&#xA;   - [jaguar], [tiger], [leopard], [snow-leopard]  &#xD;&#xA;   - [osx-server]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;` `&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Debian**:&#xD;&#xA;   - [debian]&#xD;&#xA;   - [debian-lenny], [debian-squeeze]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42283/su-retag-request-hdd-bluescreen-karmic-torrent/42512#42512&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1708" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="938" RevisionGUID="5fd0ccb4-ce0d-4750-81b1-b14a6e8c2913" CreationDate="2010-04-08T22:11:46.953" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="Super User tagging convention: Ubuntu and variants" />
  <row Id="1709" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="938" RevisionGUID="5fd0ccb4-ce0d-4750-81b1-b14a6e8c2913" CreationDate="2010-04-08T22:11:46.953" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;retagging&gt;" />
  <row Id="1710" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="938" RevisionGUID="4f162707-e093-4fdf-ba8b-799e5d4198cc" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:56.120" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/45966/super-user-tagging-convention-ubuntu-and-variants" Text="" />
  <row Id="1711" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="945" RevisionGUID="531b7e44-6f7f-4ce5-9096-1785021ef0c3" CreationDate="2010-04-09T13:50:52.373" Text="Yes, there is a minor server problem -- we're having the datacenter reboot that server now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Long story, but a reboot should fix it." />
  <row Id="1712" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="944" RevisionGUID="d407bd4d-88c9-437b-96f4-044ee2b6fdcf" CreationDate="2010-04-09T13:21:08.270" UserDisplayName="Peter Mortensen" Text="When will Super User be accessible again?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Super User is not accessible right now. The other three sites work (Server Fault, Stack Overflow and Meta Stack Overflow). Browser error message:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The connection was reset&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Traceroutes are listed below. Times are UTC+2.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Super User:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    2010-04-09T15:04:31.48 C:\&gt; tracert www.superuser.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Tracing route to superuser.com [69.59.196.219]&#xD;&#xA;    over a maximum of 30 hops:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      1     1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  FWT [192.168.1.1]&#xD;&#xA;      2   179 ms   149 ms   159 ms  10.66.37.66&#xD;&#xA;      3   144 ms   160 ms   159 ms  10.66.37.65&#xD;&#xA;      4     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;      5   303 ms   348 ms   358 ms  10.66.9.5&#xD;&#xA;      6   290 ms   329 ms   339 ms  10.66.11.2&#xD;&#xA;      7   277 ms   329 ms   319 ms  te7-8.ccr01.sto01.atlas.cogentco.com [149.6.168.9]&#xD;&#xA;      8   292 ms   359 ms   339 ms  te0-2-0-3.ccr22.ham01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.48.157]&#xD;&#xA;      9   298 ms   359 ms   377 ms  te3-2.ccr02.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.50.33]&#xD;&#xA;     10   388 ms   448 ms   457 ms  te3-2.ccr02.ymq02.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.0.69]&#xD;&#xA;     11   421 ms   468 ms   457 ms  te9-1.ccr01.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.30.238]&#xD;&#xA;     12   413 ms   477 ms   469 ms  te0-4-0-0.ccr21.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.6.158]&#xD;&#xA;     13   434 ms   488 ms   478 ms  te4-4.mpd02.den01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.7.130]&#xD;&#xA;     14   467 ms   498 ms   500 ms  te7-3.ccr01.smf01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.3.14]&#xD;&#xA;     15   483 ms   517 ms   518 ms  te4-1.ccr01.pdx01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.94]&#xD;&#xA;     16   463 ms   508 ms   528 ms  38.104.104.98&#xD;&#xA;     17   465 ms   528 ms   518 ms  PTLDORPBCR01.lsnetworks.net [216.110.192.209]&#xD;&#xA;     18   487 ms   538 ms   530 ms  vl16-eugnor53cr01.lsnetworks.net [216.110.192.190]&#xD;&#xA;     19   480 ms   528 ms   518 ms  206-192-226-18.lsnetworks.net [206.192.226.18]&#xD;&#xA;     20   467 ms   538 ms   519 ms  ge-0-0-0-cvo-core2.peak.org [69.59.218.197]&#xD;&#xA;     21   467 ms   517 ms   519 ms  vlan5-cvo-colo2.peak.org [69.59.218.226]&#xD;&#xA;     22     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;     23     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;     24     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;     25     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;     26     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;     27     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;     28     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;     29     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;     30     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Trace complete.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Stack Overflow:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    2010-04-09T15:08:34.12 C:\&gt; tracert www.stackoverflow.com&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Tracing route to stackoverflow.com [69.59.196.211]&#xD;&#xA;    over a maximum of 30 hops:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      1     1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  FWT [192.168.1.1]&#xD;&#xA;      2   368 ms   338 ms   330 ms  10.66.37.66&#xD;&#xA;      3   387 ms   357 ms   358 ms  10.66.37.65&#xD;&#xA;      4     *        *        *     Request timed out.&#xD;&#xA;      5  1462 ms   349 ms   357 ms  10.66.9.5&#xD;&#xA;      6   275 ms   350 ms   327 ms  10.66.11.2&#xD;&#xA;      7   286 ms   328 ms   329 ms  te7-8.ccr01.sto01.atlas.cogentco.com [149.6.168.9]&#xD;&#xA;      8   287 ms   338 ms   350 ms  te0-1-0-2.ccr22.ham01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.51.193]&#xD;&#xA;      9   317 ms   349 ms   368 ms  te3-2.ccr02.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.50.33]&#xD;&#xA;     10   396 ms   439 ms   447 ms  te4-2.ccr02.ymq02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.0.74]&#xD;&#xA;     11   405 ms   457 ms   467 ms  te8-7.ccr01.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.28.1]&#xD;&#xA;     12   413 ms   468 ms   468 ms  te0-0-0-3.ccr21.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.2.217]&#xD;&#xA;     13   740 ms   277 ms   408 ms  te4-4.mpd02.den01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.7.130]&#xD;&#xA;     14   276 ms   299 ms   298 ms  te7-3.ccr01.smf01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.3.14]&#xD;&#xA;     15   290 ms   296 ms   499 ms  te4-1.ccr01.pdx01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.94]&#xD;&#xA;     16   336 ms   338 ms   340 ms  38.104.104.98&#xD;&#xA;     17   473 ms   516 ms   539 ms  vl-12-PTLDORPBCR01.lsnetworks.net [216.110.192.21]&#xD;&#xA;     18   477 ms   537 ms   549 ms  vl16-eugnor53cr01.lsnetworks.net [216.110.192.190]&#xD;&#xA;     19   478 ms   527 ms   518 ms  206-192-226-18.lsnetworks.net [206.192.226.18]&#xD;&#xA;     20   476 ms   518 ms   539 ms  ge-0-0-0-cvo-core2.peak.org [69.59.218.197]&#xD;&#xA;     21   475 ms   529 ms   537 ms  vlan5-cvo-colo2.peak.org [69.59.218.226]&#xD;&#xA;     22   485 ms   528 ms   549 ms  stackoverflow.com [69.59.196.211]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Trace complete.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1713" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="944" RevisionGUID="d407bd4d-88c9-437b-96f4-044ee2b6fdcf" CreationDate="2010-04-09T13:21:08.270" UserDisplayName="Peter Mortensen" Text="Super User times out" />
  <row Id="1714" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="944" RevisionGUID="d407bd4d-88c9-437b-96f4-044ee2b6fdcf" CreationDate="2010-04-09T13:21:08.270" UserDisplayName="Peter Mortensen" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;site-down&gt;" />
  <row Id="1715" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="944" RevisionGUID="8b739e9d-3183-421a-8ea6-42d991b88d00" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:56.533" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/46045/super-user-times-out" Text="" />
  <row Id="1716" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="947" RevisionGUID="bb0991af-d674-480a-98be-a2d9b5e8fa74" CreationDate="2010-04-09T17:04:07.170" UserDisplayName="mmyers" Text="It was opened on [July 14, 2009][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/super-user-semi-private-beta-begins/" />
  <row Id="1717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="948" RevisionGUID="67cd4ed7-33c0-456a-96c8-0df73283af5b" CreationDate="2010-04-09T17:08:00.250" UserDisplayName="S.Mark" Text="You may check [this guy][1] age - 2009/07/12&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/-1" />
  <row Id="1718" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="946" RevisionGUID="6d1ffacd-227c-4d59-af85-31dc3a28c369" CreationDate="2010-04-09T17:01:43.150" UserDisplayName="Nano8Blazex" Text="I just went to superuser.com and noticed that the yearling badge (  Active member for a year, earning at least 200 reputation. This badge can be awarded multiple times.&#xD;&#xA;) hasn't been awarded to anyone yet. I find this hard to believe... is SuperUser.com less than a year old or something?" />
  <row Id="1719" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="946" RevisionGUID="6d1ffacd-227c-4d59-af85-31dc3a28c369" CreationDate="2010-04-09T17:01:43.150" UserDisplayName="Nano8Blazex" Text="How old is superuser.com?" />
  <row Id="1720" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="946" RevisionGUID="6d1ffacd-227c-4d59-af85-31dc3a28c369" CreationDate="2010-04-09T17:01:43.150" UserDisplayName="Nano8Blazex" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;yearling&gt;" />
  <row Id="1721" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="946" RevisionGUID="f87acf13-8be9-4bec-9143-7148a998892d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:57.083" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/46079/how-old-is-superuser-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="1722" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="950" RevisionGUID="5b3c6f55-4745-4a42-be07-2c2c99e76c87" CreationDate="2010-04-13T15:10:25.690" UserDisplayName="tvanfosson" Text="Expand one or both of them from their acronyms: `digital-light-processing` and `data-loss-prevention`.  I'd certainly do it for the latter since it's not particularly common in usage.  Perhaps, you could replace the latter with `backups` -- you might want to ask @Jeff about this.  :-)" />
  <row Id="1723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="951" RevisionGUID="bfc4a11a-0344-4ad5-bdec-1313df0b67a4" CreationDate="2010-04-13T15:41:25.303" UserDisplayName="Pollyanna" Text="DLP is *rarely* expanded when referencing the light processing technology, and few people even know what the acronym means.  They do, however, know what DLP refers to in terms of projectors, TVs, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Data Loss Prevention is ONLY ever abbreviated to DLP in literature after it's been defined once - everyone knows the full name, but the acronym isn't used without a definition first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further, anyone searching for data loss prevention isn't going to use the acronym to find related material - they will be swamped with projector information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Therefore if Data Loss Prevention doesn't have a better term ('backup' doesn't exactly cover it - backup is a subset of Data Loss Prevention) then the tag should be `data-loss-prevention`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`DLP` should continue to be used to the refer to the light processing technology used in projectors, etc." />
  <row Id="1724" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="949" RevisionGUID="68d8b031-8a2f-4ce3-823e-4102c7aa5908" CreationDate="2010-04-13T15:06:30.550" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="Over on superuser we have a tag conflict.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*[DLP][1]* is used for both for [DLP][2] &amp; [DLP][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since it's only three questions it would be easy to retag them, but I don't know what tags I should use.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any suggestions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/dlp&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Light_Processing&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Loss_Prevention" />
  <row Id="1725" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="949" RevisionGUID="68d8b031-8a2f-4ce3-823e-4102c7aa5908" CreationDate="2010-04-13T15:06:30.550" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="DLP tag renaming" />
  <row Id="1726" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="949" RevisionGUID="68d8b031-8a2f-4ce3-823e-4102c7aa5908" CreationDate="2010-04-13T15:06:30.550" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retagging&gt;" />
  <row Id="1727" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="949" RevisionGUID="f18f1134-cfcb-4a91-a0fb-02a47d7cd4a1" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:57.703" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/46469/dlp-tag-renaming" Text="" />
  <row Id="1728" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="953" RevisionGUID="edf21ee6-2327-4661-8809-13cb9faa9f24" CreationDate="2010-04-15T08:21:47.070" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="[Good idea indeed][1], as long as we limit that for only a few topics which are **really** recurring. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We don't want to turn any frequent topic into such thing, though. The purpose of Super User is to provide feedback to individual questions, not to be a farm of &quot;how to&quot; questions. There are sites dedicated to such goal, like the [how-to geek][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Such questions should be references of common steps to follow, but not the ultimate answer to all these questions. The purpose of such &quot;faq&quot; would be to post as a comment, as an initial read for the poster, and suggest him to update his question with any specific and additional details.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/faq&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.howtogeek.com/" />
  <row Id="1729" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="953" RevisionGUID="edf21ee6-2327-4661-8809-13cb9faa9f24" CreationDate="2010-04-15T08:21:47.070" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1730" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="952" RevisionGUID="dbe67db5-de87-4025-bd3f-b1d432a58c88" CreationDate="2010-04-15T08:09:11.280" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="There are certain questions that keep appearing on Super User.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should we create a few standard CW questions to point to when closing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are a few topics that could use some standard guides, feel free to add to this list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. [How to deal with a virus/malware infested computer][1]&#xD;&#xA; 2. List of free tools for point 1&#xD;&#xA; 3. [What linux distro is suitable for ...][2]&#xD;&#xA; 4. Best backup/restore tools&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; If you agree please answer with links to questions that you think might be suitable or if you'd like to create such a question. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/100360/what-to-do-if-my-computer-is-infected-by-a-virus-or-a-malware&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/45439/what-to-do-with-which-linux-distro-for-my-old-pc-questions-of-super-user" />
  <row Id="1731" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="952" RevisionGUID="dbe67db5-de87-4025-bd3f-b1d432a58c88" CreationDate="2010-04-15T08:09:11.280" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="Create go-to CW questions for recurring topics on SU?" />
  <row Id="1732" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="952" RevisionGUID="dbe67db5-de87-4025-bd3f-b1d432a58c88" CreationDate="2010-04-15T08:09:11.280" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="1733" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="952" RevisionGUID="dbe67db5-de87-4025-bd3f-b1d432a58c88" CreationDate="2010-04-15T08:09:11.280" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1734" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="952" RevisionGUID="8ca9cb6d-ce11-4a2e-b594-a2772036c745" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:58.223" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/46711/create-go-to-cw-questions-for-recurring-topics-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1735" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="955" RevisionGUID="c6b60124-bfd3-488f-8fcb-f6c3b7e2b36d" CreationDate="2010-04-17T19:14:51.060" UserDisplayName="waiwai933" Text="Not on the Trilogy, as of this time, although another site may be created in the future for website questions, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember, not every IT question in the world will belong on the SOFU trilogy." />
  <row Id="1736" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="956" RevisionGUID="2391c918-56ac-4c6c-bdce-b153468afdca" CreationDate="2010-04-17T20:17:35.683" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="Because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;superuser is for computer hardware and software related questions **only**. Websites are explicitly off topic as defined by the site scope laid out in the [FAQ](http://superuser.com/faq).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't understand why people can't read the FAQ before asking questions." />
  <row Id="1737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="957" RevisionGUID="1b4388fd-d3cb-47da-8825-2130999890a6" CreationDate="2010-04-17T20:39:34.210" UserDisplayName="Arjan" Text="See the FAQ: [Where can I ask questions that aren’t Super User questions?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/41570/where-can-i-ask-questions-that-arent-super-user-questions), keeping in mind that simply not all questions fit on one of SO, SF or SU." />
  <row Id="1738" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="954" RevisionGUID="b85f0237-ed53-4a42-bf02-b6e4c1b1b5cc" CreationDate="2010-04-17T19:10:43.410" UserDisplayName="petersohn" Text="In the Super User FAQ, the following questions are stated off-topic:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Programming, ask on Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA;- Servers, ask on Server Fault.&#xD;&#xA;- Web design and HTML/CSS layout, and your job title is &quot;designer&quot;, ask on Doctype.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Every time, when someone asks questions about websites (i.e. browsing), someone will say it's off topic. I can't see why. It is not about programming, nor server maintenance, nor web design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is, if these questions can't be asked on Super User, then where?" />
  <row Id="1739" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="954" RevisionGUID="b85f0237-ed53-4a42-bf02-b6e4c1b1b5cc" CreationDate="2010-04-17T19:10:43.410" UserDisplayName="petersohn" Text="Off-topic questions on Super User" />
  <row Id="1740" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="954" RevisionGUID="b85f0237-ed53-4a42-bf02-b6e4c1b1b5cc" CreationDate="2010-04-17T19:10:43.410" UserDisplayName="petersohn" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;off-topic&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="1741" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="954" RevisionGUID="b1157001-840f-4e1b-88ef-991d5a12dd07" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:58.460" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/47039/off-topic-questions-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1742" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="959" RevisionGUID="66684315-8dbd-432e-b345-89e4971f273c" CreationDate="2010-04-18T08:21:05.487" UserDisplayName="Maxim Z." Text="I think I see what problem you're facing. Your question about getting rid of a specific virus that sends out lots of emails automatically was closed as a duplicate, pointing to a general question, whose answers you have described as not helping you resolve your situation. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In this case, I think that, after this question is moved to Meta as it should be, you should pursue your original question being reopened, on the grounds that you alter the question to indicate that you're searching for solutions that people have for this specific problem. A great way to show this is to say that the solutions in the dupe question did not help you at all, as they are general, while your question is targeted. From my 9 months of using the Stack Overflow Trilogy, I think that such a statement would suffice to get your question re-opened and for it to stay open.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best of luck to you." />
  <row Id="1743" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="960" RevisionGUID="527cf3e7-bcd6-4540-ba67-dd3463195183" CreationDate="2010-04-18T09:11:24.530" UserDisplayName="Pekka" Text="I can understand the anger about the question getting closed, but on the other hand, if there's going to be a question for *every possible virus* out there, the site will be crammed with Virus questions within days. I think the policy of eliminating duplicates makes sense. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Imagine you have a Q&amp;A forum where people come for help when they had a break-in. In one case, the thief came through the window. In another, through the door. In another, through a neighbouring house. Is it not fair to redirect those users to one central checklist about how to clean out and secure windows, doors, and the rest of the house, because the basic procedures are always the same? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's different when you have a question about a specific lock, or how to fit a window with security glass, or whatever. But a general virus &quot;FAQ&quot; question is a good thing to have IMO. " />
  <row Id="1744" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="961" RevisionGUID="79319d9f-9c04-4d86-ab02-1fa21ebd4ae3" CreationDate="2010-04-18T11:10:21.400" UserDisplayName="fretje" Text="You have to know, there are viruses out there which break your system beyond repair. There is just no other solution other than to fully re-install your PC.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those are mostly rootkit viruses. And from the sound of your question, you might be infected with such a virus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really, I think you'll be losing much more time trying to clean a rootkit-ed PC than to totally re-install it from scratch (seriously, how long does that take nowadays? Half an hour to a couple of hours, depending on the speed of the machine and the extra software that you have to install next to Windows itself).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;OTOH, your edit suggests that you did find an answer using Google if I understand it right? If that is the case, the right course of action would be that you add an answer to the general question with how you removed this virus from your PC. This way, the general question will give future visitors the possibility to get rid of a couple of extra viruses." />
  <row Id="1745" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="962" RevisionGUID="ef637b0f-687d-49f6-9510-3cd239c20f72" CreationDate="2010-04-19T15:18:56.137" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="Let's make things clear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[The point of the &quot;FAQ&quot; questions][1], is **NOT** to close any related question as a duplicate of this one, this is only to provide a reference of steps to follow, to begin with.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Such question is to be given as a comment, as suggestion of the basic and usual &quot;what to do&quot;. But from that point, if this doesn't solve the situation, then it should be suggested as well to the OP to edit his question with more details, about what he tried, what remains unsolved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree with Aristos (at least with the main problem emerging from this long monologue) that such site should not be a forest of faqs, it's a site to handle each problem separately, if they are indeed different. Troubleshooting (including virus) is a &quot;one by one&quot; situation, you can't close any like this as a duplicate, just because they seem similar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/46711/create-go-to-cw-questions-for-recurring-topics-on-su/46712#46712" />
  <row Id="1746" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="963" RevisionGUID="2bc69a85-7e08-45ee-bab6-d78cfdf94c24" CreationDate="2010-04-19T16:35:21.017" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="Hmmm... I think the biggest problem with your question was that you were having trouble with a specific bit of malware, but didn't have enough information to identify it. Without that, it's hard (if not impossible) to give you a specific answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And so you were directed to a general-purpose &quot;how to troubleshoot a virus&quot; question. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, it would have been nice if someone had read your vague description and immediately been able to identify the specific bit of software responsible and provide you with a clean process for its removal... But that just wasn't feasible given your own confusion (problem manifested itself following updates, but you didn't know which updates; problem may have been introduced by email, or webpage or something else; files and processes responsible are completely unknown). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SU (like SO and SF) is a Q&amp;A site, not a troubleshooting forum: the expectation is that you'll do the research and present enough information in your question for an answer to be given. If you're unable to do that, then you probably need to ask some other questions first." />
  <row Id="1747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="964" RevisionGUID="865eae98-1c47-4730-b482-a76444c01c0e" CreationDate="2010-04-19T17:32:35.600" UserDisplayName="Phoshi" Text="**We cannot provide information on how to remove every virus**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SU is a community of incredibly knowledgable, intelligent (and handsome!) people, and yet we couldn't even hope to keep up with the constant flow of new viruses, each requiring a slightly different approach. The very best we can do is give general help.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you disagree, StackExchange 2.0 is just around the corner, have a go at VirusOverflow. If you solve the problem, regardless of method, add some of the steps you took to the general help question." />
  <row Id="1748" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="958" RevisionGUID="43b1205e-a621-4fd9-8d45-8f91af622f8b" CreationDate="2010-04-18T07:44:16.373" UserDisplayName="Aristos" Text="Regarding this question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/131176/a-hidden-program-virus-send-hundred-e-mail-can-you-have-any-experience-on-som&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like to see more answers on virus problems because I believe that virus can break up on 5-10 categories with very specific steps that if some one follow its can solve the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;One generic answer with our specific steps is not solving the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the generic answer the solution was to use other programs to solve it (there is also a video that give very good advices for one category of virus, for some other category its only give some head lines)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1749" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="958" RevisionGUID="43b1205e-a621-4fd9-8d45-8f91af622f8b" CreationDate="2010-04-18T07:44:16.373" UserDisplayName="Aristos" Text="I like to see more answer on virus problems - at least to break them up in 5-10 categories" />
  <row Id="1750" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="958" RevisionGUID="43b1205e-a621-4fd9-8d45-8f91af622f8b" CreationDate="2010-04-18T07:44:16.373" UserDisplayName="Aristos" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;antivirus&gt;" />
  <row Id="1751" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="958" RevisionGUID="54085bbb-4924-4f87-9201-893ccbf40af4" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:02:58.953" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/47076/i-like-to-see-more-answer-on-virus-problems-at-least-to-break-them-up-in-5-10-c" Text="" />
  <row Id="1752" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="966" RevisionGUID="0056179f-8ad6-4e55-9941-3a77514dc523" CreationDate="2009-07-02T20:16:28.653" UserDisplayName="ChrisF" Text="Interesting thought - is it because you think the site will need a large number of users with administrator level access?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even though this question is now closed I thought I'd add the idea I had this morning.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rather than give a large rep bonus to people to access the admin functions - make them admins, at least temporary admins. Open up (self) nominations and then if there's more than the desired number hold a vote. The winners get admin (&gt;10K rep) rights on SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then either after M months and/or when N users have &gt;10K rep these rights are removed from those users who still have less than 10K rep.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This gives us (the community) the number of admins needed for the new site but doesn't put people off when then go there and see some people with huge rep scores." />
  <row Id="1753" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="967" RevisionGUID="d593e0fc-0928-4ce7-a84f-9c0674486ebd" CreationDate="2009-07-02T20:19:33.763" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="This I could actually see happening, as opposed to moving rep over from SF to SO and vice versa. If you are intelligent enough to rack up massive reputation on SO and SF, you could theoretically be seen as a knowledgeable enough person to have high rep on SuperUser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Plus, with the hordes of noise that is inevitable on that site it may be a good idea to have a lot of high-level users there to help clean it up immediately.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another idea, which may be easier to swallow for some of the masses...just make it a one time synch. When you join SuperUser your rep is initially set to your total from SF and SO, but it wouldn't grow along with your other rep if you don't put in the effort on SuperUser&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: mmyers brought up a nice idea about capping the initial rep score at 10,000 if there was a one time rep score set to your SO + SF reputation. This would allow us to still start on a fairly level ground with the really big reputation scores that are already present on SO." />
  <row Id="1754" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="968" RevisionGUID="0b46a5dd-629d-4b5b-aacd-33f8cf959f85" CreationDate="2009-07-02T20:32:27.057" UserDisplayName="JP" Text="I think that would be a mistake as it would stop people who could make a big contribution to the site from feeling the *need* to do so.  People who want rep on SU should contribute to SU to get it.  Quality answers on SU from the guru's at SO and SF will help SU grow more quickly as it proves itself to be a great resource to people asking the questions." />
  <row Id="1755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="969" RevisionGUID="835a43e7-2b0d-44d2-bd71-989056d37024" CreationDate="2009-07-02T20:48:16.657" UserDisplayName="devinb" Text="If the sites are truly designed to cover separate topics, then the reputation you garner on SO and SF *should not matter*. If you are incredible at one of them, you should be able to do well on SU, but it's not guaranteed. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know people who are phenomenal programmers, but have no idea how to get the printer to stop blinking. A similar argument goes for someone who may be able to build a server from scratch, but wouldn't *necessarily* know how to change the colour of alternating excel spreadsheet rows. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The target of SO is &quot;Programmers&quot; &#xD;&#xA;The target of SF is &quot;Hardware/Server Administrators&quot;&#xD;&#xA;The target of SU is &quot;end users / anyone&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And I, for one, think that Jon Skeet is NOT the best representative of a 'typical user'." />
  <row Id="1756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="965" RevisionGUID="11886b02-3365-4a04-a0f0-813373bb3d7c" CreationDate="2009-07-02T20:14:46.833" UserDisplayName="Daniel A. White" Text="Can superuser's reputation be synchronized between the sum of SO, SF plus any SU rep? Just an idea." />
  <row Id="1757" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="965" RevisionGUID="11886b02-3365-4a04-a0f0-813373bb3d7c" CreationDate="2009-07-02T20:14:46.833" UserDisplayName="Daniel A. White" Text="Make superuser an aggregate of SO and SF Reputation" />
  <row Id="1758" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="965" RevisionGUID="11886b02-3365-4a04-a0f0-813373bb3d7c" CreationDate="2009-07-02T20:14:46.833" UserDisplayName="Daniel A. White" Text="&lt;status-declined&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="1759" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="965" RevisionGUID="6b7da6e0-ceed-46dd-909e-793af102b317" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:17.513" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/1951/make-superuser-an-aggregate-of-so-and-sf-reputation" Text="" />
  <row Id="1777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="977" RevisionGUID="70d504c5-ce3b-4a72-ae56-d409a739d70c" CreationDate="2009-09-02T19:46:50.213" UserDisplayName="TheTXI" Text="It was ruled very early on in SuperUser's beta period that questions concerning games are not acceptable questions. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this is not to your liking, you can take it up further with Jeff Atwood &amp; Co. at team@superuser.com. I should note, however, that Jeff was the one who first started bringing the hammer down." />
  <row Id="1778" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="978" RevisionGUID="0f878746-c4fe-434d-a86c-0c255b88784b" CreationDate="2009-09-02T19:47:18.920" UserDisplayName="Michael Stum" Text="The question is not if Video Game is software, but that Video Games are not considered to be appropriate on SuperUser as [stated in the FAQ][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;* computer software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;… and it is not about videogames or consoles, then you're in the right place to ask your question!&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/faq" />
  <row Id="1779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="976" RevisionGUID="8a48b937-c4ee-4da1-a02c-fdff5bd98d7f" CreationDate="2009-09-02T19:44:51.200" UserDisplayName="NoCanDo" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Are video game questions appropriate for superuser?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6542/are-video-game-questions-appropriate-for-superuser)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why was this SuperUser [post][1] about video games closed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I feel video games *are* software and that this post should be reopened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/2109/must-have&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1780" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="976" RevisionGUID="8a48b937-c4ee-4da1-a02c-fdff5bd98d7f" CreationDate="2009-09-02T19:44:51.200" UserDisplayName="NoCanDo" Text="Why was my SuperUser post about video games closed?" />
  <row Id="1781" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="976" RevisionGUID="8a48b937-c4ee-4da1-a02c-fdff5bd98d7f" CreationDate="2009-09-02T19:44:51.200" UserDisplayName="NoCanDo" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;video-games&gt;" />
  <row Id="1782" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="976" RevisionGUID="8a48b937-c4ee-4da1-a02c-fdff5bd98d7f" CreationDate="2009-09-02T19:44:51.200" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1783" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="976" RevisionGUID="7f205d32-233b-43f5-bcbe-4d0e074e021e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:19.353" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/19781/why-was-my-superuser-post-about-video-games-closed" Text="" />
  <row Id="1784" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="979" RevisionGUID="adf134c8-4292-4bd5-bbc1-678f6a153d77" CreationDate="2009-09-17T03:32:37.220" UserDisplayName="a_m0d" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Tag name not viewable when doing search on superuser](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15174/tag-name-not-viewable-when-doing-search-on-superuser)  &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;I just did a search for &quot;Excel graph&quot; on superuser, and noticed that it automatically searched for &quot;graph&quot; in the tag &lt;kbd&gt;Excel&lt;/kbd&gt; (because there are more than 50 questions tagged excel).  However, in the side bar, I noticed that there is a bug showing the &quot;excel&quot; tag - see the image below. ![Bug in tag display](http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/387/screenshotquestionscont.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mousing over the tag seems to make it work correctly, though.  &#xD;&#xA;![Correct display on mouse over](http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/387/screenshotquestionscont.png)" />
  <row Id="1785" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="979" RevisionGUID="adf134c8-4292-4bd5-bbc1-678f6a153d77" CreationDate="2009-09-17T03:32:37.220" UserDisplayName="a_m0d" Text="Tag display bug on superuser" />
  <row Id="1786" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="979" RevisionGUID="adf134c8-4292-4bd5-bbc1-678f6a153d77" CreationDate="2009-09-17T03:32:37.220" UserDisplayName="a_m0d" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="1787" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="979" RevisionGUID="7a3a36b5-6fe3-4e17-97d8-17c7bf726b14" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:19.893" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/22325/tag-display-bug-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1788" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="981" RevisionGUID="f4119870-5d88-449e-9fb8-9cd4f2ac61fa" CreationDate="2009-09-21T19:50:46.513" UserDisplayName="Jon Skeet" Text="According to my [Reputation Tracker][1], you've gained 215 today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you hit the envelope, you need to explicitly click on &quot;Today&quot; to get the real UTC day (which is what the rep limit is based on) instead of the day starting at the server's local midnight. Or you could use my reputation tracker ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://csharpindepth.com/StackOverflow/ReputationTracker.aspx?so=&amp;sf=&amp;su=4386&amp;meta=&amp;mode=today&amp;showflair=true" />
  <row Id="1789" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="982" RevisionGUID="dfdfd182-9efd-43ca-88b9-f0b248e8ba8a" CreationDate="2009-09-21T20:36:08.833" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="[This has been hashed out pretty well in previous questions][1], but since you took the time to [draw on a screenshot][2] I'll copy my comments addressing the apparent discrepancy:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bounties count toward the cap. **Everything counts toward the cap.** Bounties and &quot;accept&quot; bonuses will still be applied to your reputation after you've hit the cap, but 'till then they're just normal reputation as far as that cap is concerned.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bonuses awarded to users for an accepted answer (normally 15, additional when there's a bounty on the question) *are* immune to the daily reputation cap... however, the cap is not immune to them: you'll just hit the cap that much faster if your answers get accepted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some of the folks who *routinely* hit the rep cap [would dearly love to see this changed][3]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8272/the-rep-cap-is-200-per-day-correct&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/19478/the-many-memes-of-meta/19775#19775&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15540/award-bounties-at-the-end-of-the-day" />
  <row Id="1790" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="982" RevisionGUID="dfdfd182-9efd-43ca-88b9-f0b248e8ba8a" CreationDate="2009-09-21T20:36:08.833" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="980" RevisionGUID="b584c573-a6d5-40c9-a04b-7994744eacdb" CreationDate="2009-09-21T19:44:23.033" UserDisplayName="Wil" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [The rep cap is 200 per day, correct?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8272/the-rep-cap-is-200-per-day-correct)  &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;I love SuperUser.com and I am on it all the time, I do not do it for the reputation but it is a very nice bonus for helping people, that being said - it confuses the heck out of me!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that in the FAQ it says you can have a maximum of 200 a day (excluding the answer + bounties) however even when I account for time differences, I do not understand what is happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems that I have only got 150 reputation and it has locked me out for the day.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I love the site and would happily give help if reputation wasn't there, but as it is there, I want to understand it! I have seen other seemingly random behaviour like this recently and I just want to know if I have overlooked or done something wrong?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i35.tinypic.com/j5uq68.jpg" />
  <row Id="1792" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="980" RevisionGUID="b584c573-a6d5-40c9-a04b-7994744eacdb" CreationDate="2009-09-21T19:44:23.033" UserDisplayName="Wil" Text="I don't understand the reputation limit." />
  <row Id="1793" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="980" RevisionGUID="b584c573-a6d5-40c9-a04b-7994744eacdb" CreationDate="2009-09-21T19:44:23.033" UserDisplayName="Wil" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="1794" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="980" RevisionGUID="e411287c-040c-4c8a-b2eb-8471e8306e3e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:20.147" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/22902/i-dont-understand-the-reputation-limit" Text="" />
  <row Id="1795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="984" RevisionGUID="bb19d51b-4929-4119-851a-c9e28f4e71d0" CreationDate="2009-09-25T11:09:30.943" UserDisplayName="Ralph Rickenbach" Text="Well over 15 in just short of 10K questions - I would not call this overrun. And in an evaluation situation I would love to have a source where I can get such lists and reward the people helping me out with reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I agree with a lower tolerance from the mods - unless the OP points to his use case for the answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I want to learn more about Windows - what are the most useful shortcuts? -&gt; CW&#xD;&#xA; - In my project I need a ... to ..., what are the most useful ones -&gt; not CW, even though there is not one correct answer. But there is one that is most useful for the OP." />
  <row Id="1796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="985" RevisionGUID="1eb71308-effe-4d12-b5e0-1850c8596b23" CreationDate="2009-09-25T11:22:52.463" UserDisplayName="Ivo Flipse" Text="They are only rep gainers if people upvote, if people upvote it's useful for them, if it's useful they deserve (some) rep. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Else we just need a flag option to mark it for CW (though I expect a lot of whines then from people who lost rep because of this)" />
  <row Id="1797" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="983" RevisionGUID="f845f4a9-8d8e-42d2-9eec-18db4098323b" CreationDate="2009-09-25T10:51:08.370" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Can we please have more strictness on SU?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/15456/can-we-please-have-more-strictness-on-su)  &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;I know they're useful, but it's getting rather annoying. SU is overrun by all sorts of **most useful** questions. I wouldn't mind this that much, but nobody bothers to make them **CW** before posting. They are there only for gaining reputation; I'm not sure they even care about the answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the moment there are well over 15 questions of this kind." />
  <row Id="1798" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="983" RevisionGUID="f845f4a9-8d8e-42d2-9eec-18db4098323b" CreationDate="2009-09-25T10:51:08.370" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="Should we curb down on &quot;most useful&quot; questions?" />
  <row Id="1799" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="983" RevisionGUID="f845f4a9-8d8e-42d2-9eec-18db4098323b" CreationDate="2009-09-25T10:51:08.370" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="1800" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="983" RevisionGUID="314b703e-fc30-4753-a67c-2b6ed81fed69" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:21.127" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/23429/should-we-curb-down-on-most-useful-questions" Text="" />
  <row Id="1801" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="987" RevisionGUID="bbc2feb5-f925-4780-9ad4-d94e4f46db7d" CreationDate="2009-09-27T20:01:53.283" UserDisplayName="Rex M" Text="If you want your question to be seen again, go back and edit it to add more detail. If it's that important to you, you should have been working on it by yourself too and you have new research or information to add. Every edit will bump the question to the top of the page. Posting duplicate questions will get you blacklisted quickly.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[**Here is a much clearer way of saying it.**][1] (thanks @shog9)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7046/how-to-get-attention-for-your-old-unanswered-questions" />
  <row Id="1802" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="988" RevisionGUID="b077c898-30bd-4318-b2f9-c67686994958" CreationDate="2009-09-28T09:25:47.083" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="**2009-10-05: The user's account is no longer suspended. He was e-mailed with regards to this.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With regards to this user and the current account suspension.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*These notes are taken from the Moderator annotations on the users account and has been ongoing since early September 2009. Also all actions where discussed with the complete SU moderator team before taking said actions.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the **5th of September 2009** an e-mail was sent to the registered e-mail address, addressing the issue of multiple moderator flags by community members for the above user with regards to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Questions unrelated to Computer Hardware and Software Troubleshooting&#xD;&#xA;- Asking numerous unrelated Discussion questions&#xD;&#xA;- Posting multiple answers to single questions&#xD;&#xA;- Referring to products or companies negatively&#xD;&#xA;- Flagging all questions and answers as Community Wiki&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Numerous answers and questions had to be deleted due to the above, although in retrospect they should have been flagged as spam. &#xD;&#xA;**No response was received to this e-mail.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the **27th of September 2009** a second e-mail was sent informing the user of his 7 days account suspension due to continued abuse of the system, and being flagged again numerous times. The account was then put on 7 day suspension. **No response was received on this e-mail**. However I did happen to find this question today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In both cases it was recommended that the user read the FAQ and also contact the moderator team should they not understand the reasons for the warning and subsequent suspension. The most likely reasons for the questions not being answered is due to the above issues and therefore the community is wary to answer questions, since most of them are flagged CW.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I will state again, as previously stated many times, if any other moderator feels that I have acted incorrectly and my reasons for my actions are invalid, they are welcome to override my decision. This has been done in the past and is the purpose of there being a moderator **team***.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="986" RevisionGUID="9e1f9c60-1244-4a06-b036-51a70978f935" CreationDate="2009-09-27T19:57:02.340" UserDisplayName="user134578" Text="I had a very difficult question that I urgently needed an answer to. It got buried very quickly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Is there anyway to bump a question higher in the questions list? &#xD;&#xA;- ([possible answer][1])&#xD;&#xA; - How do I ask two related questions? Should I keep them in one question that would require two answers? Or should I split them up?&#xD;&#xA;- ([possible answer][2], [possible answer][3])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I made a second question that linked back to the first, and it was marked as spam. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There was very little feedback on what I had done wrong, and the people who did comment were **extremely** impolite and unhelpful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - What are the reasons a question can be closed for, and what do each of them mean?&#xD;&#xA;- ([possible answer][4])&#xD;&#xA; - Is there any way to report/punish users who are being abusive in comments? &#xD;&#xA;- ([possible answer][5], [possible answer][6])&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;This is a great site, but if the community attitude continues to be so discouraging, you'll find that people will migrate to a site with a more welcoming attitude instead.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/7046/how-to-get-attention-for-your-old-unanswered-questions&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10243/asking-a-follow-up-question&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8910/asking-a-similar-but-not-the-same-question&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10582/what-is-a-closed-question-in-stack-overflow-how-do-they-work/10583#10583&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/1323/flag-abusive-users&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/16077/handling-harassing-users" />
  <row Id="1804" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="986" RevisionGUID="9e1f9c60-1244-4a06-b036-51a70978f935" CreationDate="2009-09-27T19:57:02.340" UserDisplayName="user134578" Text="Very frustrating user experience" />
  <row Id="1805" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="986" RevisionGUID="9e1f9c60-1244-4a06-b036-51a70978f935" CreationDate="2009-09-27T19:57:02.340" UserDisplayName="user134578" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;moderators&gt;&lt;account-suspension&gt;" />
  <row Id="1806" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="986" RevisionGUID="464bc9ba-6f24-46c4-9f22-32994359e8d4" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:21.823" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/23654/very-frustrating-user-experience" Text="" />
  <row Id="1807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="990" RevisionGUID="d3c9abcd-95f2-41e9-b134-2a5653d004b3" CreationDate="2009-10-17T09:12:04.033" UserDisplayName="Rich Bradshaw" Text="It's not PHP, it's ASP.NET.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See here: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2008/09/what-was-stack-overflow-built-with/" />
  <row Id="1808" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="991" RevisionGUID="5c3b3ea9-8f44-4772-8b7f-eee8f82328d5" CreationDate="2009-10-17T09:32:42.587" UserDisplayName="joschi" Text="As already mentioned, StackOverflow/ServerFault/SuperUser/... uses ASP.NET and the whole Microsoft Stack.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might want to read the discussion about [SO clones][1] one meta.stackoverflow.com (which is where your question belongs IMHO).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/2267/so-clones" />
  <row Id="1809" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="992" RevisionGUID="8962e78c-9d34-4879-b5bc-e51c2e71266d" CreationDate="2009-10-17T09:34:24.207" UserDisplayName="Phoshi" Text="Complex PHP websites are made of more than one script. A website *like* SU wouldn't be very difficult with PHP and a database, but SU was made with love :3&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, you want something like SU? Get learning PHP, it'll be great fun :)" />
  <row Id="1810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="989" RevisionGUID="107db0a2-0e4f-48c7-bd90-fd4c1cbb535a" CreationDate="2009-10-17T09:09:48.403" UserDisplayName="NT" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What was Stack Overflow built with?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10369/what-was-stack-overflow-built-with)  &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;Does anybody know which PHP script Super User is using? I plan to set-up a web site for college education issues. But I want it to have a script like superuser.com. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where can I get this script?" />
  <row Id="1811" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="989" RevisionGUID="107db0a2-0e4f-48c7-bd90-fd4c1cbb535a" CreationDate="2009-10-17T09:09:48.403" UserDisplayName="NT" Text="Which PHP script does Super User use?" />
  <row Id="1812" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="989" RevisionGUID="107db0a2-0e4f-48c7-bd90-fd4c1cbb535a" CreationDate="2009-10-17T09:09:48.403" UserDisplayName="NT" Text="&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="1813" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="989" RevisionGUID="6621c7eb-9592-4d0c-9a6f-7a5494b79354" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:23.577" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/26306/which-php-script-does-super-user-use" Text="" />
  <row Id="1814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="994" RevisionGUID="aed97c74-c85f-48ad-b08d-d07470f9b7b9" CreationDate="2009-12-07T11:57:01.573" UserDisplayName="Macha" Text="Maybe they don't want to encourage people to post on low voted questions on SuperUser? After all, the average quality of questions there is regrettably lower." />
  <row Id="1815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="993" RevisionGUID="5309615e-68c8-4b66-9642-6129a7535ec3" CreationDate="2009-10-22T12:30:33.847" UserDisplayName="ChrisF" Text="I've just noticed that the Reversal badge isn't available on [Super User][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this an oversight or by design?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's available on both [Stack Overflow][2] and [Server Fault][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**7&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; November 2009**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Still not turned on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**7&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; December 2009**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Mortarboard, Epic and Legendary badges were rolled out across all the sites, but the Reversal badge is still not appearing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/badges&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/badges&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://serverfault.com/badges" />
  <row Id="1816" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="993" RevisionGUID="5309615e-68c8-4b66-9642-6129a7535ec3" CreationDate="2009-10-22T12:30:33.847" UserDisplayName="ChrisF" Text="Reversal badge not available on Super User" />
  <row Id="1817" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="993" RevisionGUID="5309615e-68c8-4b66-9642-6129a7535ec3" CreationDate="2009-10-22T12:30:33.847" UserDisplayName="ChrisF" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;badges&gt;" />
  <row Id="1818" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="993" RevisionGUID="3aead8a4-72a6-4f67-b0ae-c58d7c2f43c4" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:24.273" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/26919/reversal-badge-not-available-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="996" RevisionGUID="1ed80e8f-606b-4f97-b141-2458a6e38acd" CreationDate="2009-09-11T18:05:51.933" UserDisplayName="Kevin Panko" Text="[Yahoo! Answers](http://answers.yahoo.com/)" />
  <row Id="1820" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="997" RevisionGUID="482d5de6-4b6c-4e81-8ce8-9553d632fa6d" CreationDate="2009-09-11T18:09:15.860" UserDisplayName="Donut" Text="Here's a few (in addition to the already-mentioned Yahoo! Answers):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [AnswerBag][1] &#xD;&#xA; - [WikiAnswers][2]&#xD;&#xA; - [AskVille][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Additionally, the people behind SuperUser.com are developing [StackExchange][4], a platform that anyone can license (for a fee) and create a specialized Q&amp;A site of their own. &lt;br/&gt;They're currently beta-testing, there should be plenty of specialized SuperUser-esque sites in the coming weeks as development continues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.answerbag.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://wiki.answers.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://askville.amazon.com/Index.do&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="1821" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="998" RevisionGUID="188ba18f-d0d7-4af4-9890-63dcad4303f1" CreationDate="2009-09-11T18:45:23.680" UserDisplayName="Doug Harris" Text="Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mahalo.com/answers/&quot;&gt;Mahalo Answers&lt;/a&gt; as well." />
  <row Id="1822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="999" RevisionGUID="7f2a6117-c737-4ba6-8af2-ae4441ba5b86" CreationDate="2009-09-11T18:53:39.547" UserDisplayName="th3dude" Text="[AskReddit][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.reddit.com/r/askreddit" />
  <row Id="1823" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1000" RevisionGUID="8179051c-024a-4c11-a7bf-740beef13713" CreationDate="2009-09-11T19:19:37.840" UserDisplayName="Bonus" Text="[Ask metafilter][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://ask.metafilter.com/" />
  <row Id="1824" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="995" RevisionGUID="5b367479-70c6-4abd-a185-50401045688e" CreationDate="2009-09-11T18:04:04.963" UserDisplayName="RBA" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Where can I ask questions that aren&amp;rsquo;t programming questions?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8401/where-can-i-ask-questions-that-arent-programming-questions)  &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;I wanted to know from where i can get answers to my general questions same as this site is for General Technical Questions based site, plz share such websites?" />
  <row Id="1825" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="995" RevisionGUID="5b367479-70c6-4abd-a185-50401045688e" CreationDate="2009-09-11T18:04:04.963" UserDisplayName="RBA" Text="Sites similar to SU where I can ask general questions?" />
  <row Id="1826" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="995" RevisionGUID="5b367479-70c6-4abd-a185-50401045688e" CreationDate="2009-09-11T18:04:04.963" UserDisplayName="RBA" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="1827" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="995" RevisionGUID="5f10779d-274d-4366-80ee-0b043b4be1c5" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:24.640" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/27294/sites-similar-to-su-where-i-can-ask-general-questions" Text="" />
  <row Id="1828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1001" RevisionGUID="8434e3af-9ea6-4d1a-af8c-7771574077a5" CreationDate="2009-10-28T17:36:32.367" UserDisplayName="pkaeding" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How do we grow the Server Fault and Super User communities?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/26689/how-do-we-grow-the-server-fault-and-super-user-communities)  &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;So, I've noticed that a few questions I have asked have gotten very few views on Superuser.com, and I'm curious what other folks' experiences have been.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have been very impressed with the responses on Stackoverflow, even when it was in private beta, but I'm just not seeing that with Superuser.  I think it would be a great resource if it works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As a corollary discussion question, how can/should SuperUser reach critical mass?  Would advertising help?  Where?" />
  <row Id="1829" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1001" RevisionGUID="8434e3af-9ea6-4d1a-af8c-7771574077a5" CreationDate="2009-10-28T17:36:32.367" UserDisplayName="pkaeding" Text="Does SuperUser have critical mass?" />
  <row Id="1830" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1001" RevisionGUID="8434e3af-9ea6-4d1a-af8c-7771574077a5" CreationDate="2009-10-28T17:36:32.367" UserDisplayName="pkaeding" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="1831" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1001" RevisionGUID="8434e3af-9ea6-4d1a-af8c-7771574077a5" CreationDate="2009-10-28T17:36:32.367" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1832" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1001" RevisionGUID="13824816-96c5-4b35-8585-2d916ad8a12f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:25.390" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/27602/does-superuser-have-critical-mass" Text="" />
  <row Id="1833" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1002" RevisionGUID="e5dfc44b-4414-4121-8c99-3905c7f00310" CreationDate="2009-11-22T20:27:58.503" UserDisplayName="bobobobo" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Are video game questions appropriate for superuser?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6542/are-video-game-questions-appropriate-for-superuser)  &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;At some level games are still software and you still have to use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I asked a &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/73897/warcraft-3-replays&quot;&gt;question&lt;/a&gt; about how to &lt;b&gt;use&lt;/b&gt; a specific game (making the question belong on Super&lt;b&gt;user&lt;/b&gt;.com), but a couple of ninnies downvoted the question and want to close it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find this annoying and I don't think you should have the &quot;purely video game or console related&quot; option on the close box.  After all, games &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt; software, and you do have to &lt;b&gt;use it&lt;/b&gt; at some level." />
  <row Id="1834" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1002" RevisionGUID="e5dfc44b-4414-4121-8c99-3905c7f00310" CreationDate="2009-11-22T20:27:58.503" UserDisplayName="bobobobo" Text="Game-related questions on SU" />
  <row Id="1835" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1002" RevisionGUID="e5dfc44b-4414-4121-8c99-3905c7f00310" CreationDate="2009-11-22T20:27:58.503" UserDisplayName="bobobobo" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;software&gt;&lt;games&gt;" />
  <row Id="1836" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1002" RevisionGUID="a820aab8-a474-44cc-94f0-2ab002532267" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:25.650" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/30642/game-related-questions-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1004" RevisionGUID="5e7c9422-7fe5-473e-b865-19cf9934de89" CreationDate="2009-11-26T01:41:35.383" UserDisplayName="zarembisty" Text="I believe it's all written in ASP.NET MVC - and they all look the same because they all use the same base code, but it's not opensourced so can't use it without paying." />
  <row Id="1838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1005" RevisionGUID="cb05aa50-eb40-4246-8332-1d83cff566fc" CreationDate="2009-11-26T01:44:56.080" UserDisplayName="Sathya" Text="All are powered by [StackExchange][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="1839" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1006" RevisionGUID="473d7aa7-5913-4931-a0bb-051ea83f41ef" CreationDate="2009-11-26T01:45:10.700" UserDisplayName="ripper234" Text="The technology is a year and a half old, open to 3rd parties at [StackExchange][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="1840" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1003" RevisionGUID="52727b38-b6d4-4d91-87a1-9a3ac5fbb436" CreationDate="2009-11-26T01:37:31.333" UserDisplayName="iaddesign" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What was Stack Overflow built with?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10369/what-was-stack-overflow-built-with)  &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;what kind of site is superuser, stackoverflow, startups.com ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;they all have the same theme is this a new technology that im missing out on? how do i get a hold of it to do something myself?" />
  <row Id="1841" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1003" RevisionGUID="52727b38-b6d4-4d91-87a1-9a3ac5fbb436" CreationDate="2009-11-26T01:37:31.333" UserDisplayName="iaddesign" Text="what kind of site is superuser, stackoverflow, startups.com ?" />
  <row Id="1842" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1003" RevisionGUID="52727b38-b6d4-4d91-87a1-9a3ac5fbb436" CreationDate="2009-11-26T01:37:31.333" UserDisplayName="iaddesign" Text="&lt;blog&gt;&lt;blogging&gt;&lt;startup&gt;" />
  <row Id="1843" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1003" RevisionGUID="46f941dd-9b3b-4477-967e-915fc792b748" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:25.917" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/30996/what-kind-of-site-is-superuser-stackoverflow-startups-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="1844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1008" RevisionGUID="0201f56d-01db-45ba-9247-de8da910a73f" CreationDate="2010-01-21T19:37:03.403" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="Hit the 'Today' button in the Recent Activity page, then look at the number displayed on the Reputation tab.  That will show you the daily total you've received so far.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember that downvotes decrease the daily cap also." />
  <row Id="1845" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1009" RevisionGUID="a896ad27-dbbb-4b3a-8471-cf1631056d7a" CreationDate="2010-01-21T19:43:54.420" UserDisplayName="Pollyanna" Text="Unfortunately the definition of &quot;today&quot; is ambiguous on the site.  As Lance points out, clicking on the &quot;today&quot; link will give you everything since the rep clock reset, and should show you where the difference is." />
  <row Id="1846" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1010" RevisionGUID="43049353-4d3d-4a86-addd-b45e6029b773" CreationDate="2010-01-21T20:04:50.487" UserDisplayName="Jon Skeet" Text="My [Reputation Tracker][1] shows you getting 200 today. I suggest you compare the rep shown there with the values in the page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://csharpindepth.com/StackOverflow/ReputationTracker.aspx?so=&amp;sf=&amp;su=25472&amp;meta=&amp;mode=today&amp;showflair=true" />
  <row Id="1847" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1007" RevisionGUID="fa1afc98-6fd9-4a77-8f15-4f59ab3dc9b5" CreationDate="2010-01-21T19:33:30.743" UserDisplayName="whitequark" Text="I encountered a strange reputation cap behaviour on Super User. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got only 112 today, as reported on my recent activity page, but it has already given me the corresponding badge and stopped counting. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not funny, I even didn't got bored for now! &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why can this happen?" />
  <row Id="1848" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1007" RevisionGUID="fa1afc98-6fd9-4a77-8f15-4f59ab3dc9b5" CreationDate="2010-01-21T19:33:30.743" UserDisplayName="whitequark" Text="Real reputation cap showing wrong on my Recent activity page" />
  <row Id="1849" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1007" RevisionGUID="fa1afc98-6fd9-4a77-8f15-4f59ab3dc9b5" CreationDate="2010-01-21T19:33:30.743" UserDisplayName="whitequark" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="1850" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1007" RevisionGUID="9c0fc30d-7dfc-4e12-b7e1-5bbe373e7d89" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:26.493" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/36491/real-reputation-cap-showing-wrong-on-my-recent-activity-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="1851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1012" RevisionGUID="66ff941e-a6a4-44ae-8b82-907b833ef485" CreationDate="2010-01-24T18:29:02.763" Text="http://superuser.com/faq&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; **What kind of questions can I ask here?**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about …&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   * computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   * computer software&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and it is not about …&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   * videogames or consoles&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   * websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   * cellphones or mobile devices, except smartphones such as iPhone that interface with your computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt;   * electronic devices or media players, except insofar as they interface with your computer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I recommended that someone start a [Stack Exchange][1] site for Facebook.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="1852" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1011" RevisionGUID="9a0c2612-b5f9-4641-b68e-91c4f816fcca" CreationDate="2010-01-24T18:24:01.433" UserDisplayName="flybywire" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Official stance on Facebook questions on SU?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/30475/official-stance-on-facebook-questions-on-su)  &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;I wanted to ask a question about facebook in superuser only to discover that almost all questions tagged [facebook][1] have been closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the policy regarding asking user questions about websites (Wikipedia, Google, Gmail, etc) and social networks in particular (facebook, twitter).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand programming questions on facebook apps on StackOverflow are ok, as demonstrated by the large number of [related questions][2] there, that are actively being asked and discussed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question regards specifically user questions, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* How do I open a page?&#xD;&#xA;* How do I block a user?&#xD;&#xA;* How do I upload/delete/tag pictures/videos?&#xD;&#xA;* How do I set my privacy settings to blah, blah, blah?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/facebook&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/facebook" />
  <row Id="1853" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1011" RevisionGUID="9a0c2612-b5f9-4641-b68e-91c4f816fcca" CreationDate="2010-01-24T18:24:01.433" UserDisplayName="flybywire" Text="Asking questions about facebook in superuser" />
  <row Id="1854" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1011" RevisionGUID="9a0c2612-b5f9-4641-b68e-91c4f816fcca" CreationDate="2010-01-24T18:24:01.433" UserDisplayName="flybywire" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;support&gt;&lt;close-reasons&gt;&lt;facebook&gt;" />
  <row Id="1855" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1011" RevisionGUID="951333a9-2934-4bdd-82ec-9eafb5f82732" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:27.280" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/36839/asking-questions-about-facebook-in-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1856" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1014" RevisionGUID="d4ca005d-5281-4e2f-89e5-13dac97dde6e" CreationDate="2010-02-01T14:49:24.803" UserDisplayName="SLaks" Text="If you vote, then revert the vote, you'll still get this message.  &#xD;&#xA;Don't ask me why. " />
  <row Id="1857" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1013" RevisionGUID="e3eadd5e-4991-4a92-9020-0384f5e31ba9" CreationDate="2010-02-01T14:31:07.247" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; [&amp;ldquo;Vote too old to be changed&amp;rdquo;&amp;hellip; but I haven&amp;rsquo;t voted!](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/18360/vote-too-old-to-be-changed-but-i-havent-voted)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't vote on this question I get the &quot;Vote to old to be changed&quot; message even though I never voted on it. Clicking on the score shows no up- or down-votes at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://superuser.com/questions/103310/screen-capture-in-mac-is-all-black][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:**&#xD;&#xA;I think I understand what happened. I first saw the question and upvoted it, I then realised the owner of the question was not a member of SU (migrated from SO) and removed my vote. (I usually don't bother with questions with no owner). Later I came back and found that the user had registered and wanted to place my vote and encounter the error message.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/103310/screen-capture-in-mac-is-all-black" />
  <row Id="1858" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1013" RevisionGUID="e3eadd5e-4991-4a92-9020-0384f5e31ba9" CreationDate="2010-02-01T14:31:07.247" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="I Get &quot;Vote too old to be changed&quot; message but I have not voted on it" />
  <row Id="1859" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1013" RevisionGUID="e3eadd5e-4991-4a92-9020-0384f5e31ba9" CreationDate="2010-02-01T14:31:07.247" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;voting&gt;" />
  <row Id="1860" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1013" RevisionGUID="985ad281-8209-4b5c-abb0-835f71156923" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:27.480" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/37788/i-get-vote-too-old-to-be-changed-message-but-i-have-not-voted-on-it" Text="" />
  <row Id="1861" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1016" RevisionGUID="95e4529a-bcea-4eaf-985a-0f406faba986" CreationDate="2010-02-17T07:26:09.303" UserDisplayName="Chacha102" Text="Incase no one bothered to tell you, StackOverflow, SuperUser and Serverfault are the original implementations of this style of user interface. Doctype came afterwards, and since it is related to what we do, we linked to them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those 3 sites actually run on the same software StackExchange runs on, which makes sense because StackExchange was the product of StackOverflow's success. They took the user interface  and made it available to others for a charge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, we are the originals. And the source-code is not open source and/or buy-able (for under a couple million)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to put this under the **[generation-gap]** tag. It seems like everyone just assumes that a site is built on another site's framework or an open source project. While StackOverflow does have some OpenSource components, it was pretty much developed ground up." />
  <row Id="1862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1015" RevisionGUID="0a644cb8-feed-49ae-aea2-ede4cc420cc1" CreationDate="2010-02-17T07:01:00.530" UserDisplayName="Cawas" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What was Stack Overflow built with?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10369/what-was-stack-overflow-built-with)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Can't find it anywhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks very alike www.vark.com/community which is the uservoice I've confused it with at first, and even more to unity3d answers, which might pretty much be the same." />
  <row Id="1863" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1015" RevisionGUID="0a644cb8-feed-49ae-aea2-ede4cc420cc1" CreationDate="2010-02-17T07:01:00.530" UserDisplayName="Cawas" Text="What interface software system is used in superuser?" />
  <row Id="1864" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1015" RevisionGUID="0a644cb8-feed-49ae-aea2-ede4cc420cc1" CreationDate="2010-02-17T07:01:00.530" UserDisplayName="Cawas" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;software&gt;&lt;interface&gt;" />
  <row Id="1865" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1015" RevisionGUID="a29c2c0b-9091-463a-81ed-2a337ffaf366" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:27.837" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39669/what-interface-software-system-is-used-in-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="1866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1017" RevisionGUID="b88ac9c4-c08a-4ecc-a234-168133fd5518" CreationDate="2010-02-19T18:27:51.700" UserDisplayName="Oscar Reyes" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Superuser website applications policy](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39615/superuser-website-applications-policy)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I've asked:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[What WYSIWSG Editor is used by gMail][1] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And it was closed as &quot;not computer&quot; related. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With the message: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;*&quot;Questions [...] are expected to [..] relate to computer software [...] This [...] is very far afield from software ...&quot;*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can I know why? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Where else am I going to ask this kind of questions from now on? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What became with the &quot;be aware of the ewoks&quot; spirit by which superuser.com was created in first place?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]:  http://superuser.com/questions/110730/what-wysiwsg-editor-is-used-on-gmail-closed" />
  <row Id="1867" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1017" RevisionGUID="b88ac9c4-c08a-4ecc-a234-168133fd5518" CreationDate="2010-02-19T18:27:51.700" UserDisplayName="Oscar Reyes" Text="Not computer related on SuperUser.com" />
  <row Id="1868" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1017" RevisionGUID="b88ac9c4-c08a-4ecc-a234-168133fd5518" CreationDate="2010-02-19T18:27:51.700" UserDisplayName="Oscar Reyes" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;" />
  <row Id="1869" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1017" RevisionGUID="e28074aa-9e55-474a-8b0e-5b867ec32ca0" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:28.943" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39979/not-computer-related-on-superuser-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="1870" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1019" RevisionGUID="43da9987-0fb0-4675-8719-541ec58c2172" CreationDate="2010-02-20T01:41:45.443" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="You can't ask questions about Web Applications or anything that runs on a website.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See this [discussion][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your question didn't fall under that rule, and shouldn't have been closed, but a moderator made that ruling, so I'm not sure you'll be able to get that changed.  I put a tag on it of software-rec, which is the standard tag for those kind of requests.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39615/superuser-website-applications-policy" />
  <row Id="1871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1020" RevisionGUID="a4d7544e-41dc-4860-a100-f8fe2a5269d1" CreationDate="2010-02-20T01:45:36.760" UserDisplayName="Shog9" Text="&gt; Is asking about software that is traditionally accessed by the end user via the HTTP protocol somehow different than asking about software that executes locally on your computer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes: Facebook isn't running on your machine. Note that you can ask questions about web browsers - those *do* run on your machine. You can even ask questions involving your operating system's TCP stack. But once control leaves your box and enters that nebulous &quot;Internet&quot; thingy, who *knows* what it's running on? Your WordPress problem could be caused by some sloppy SysAdmin spilling RC Cola onto the rack, or hordes of rabid squirrels dancing the Macarena in front of the AC fans...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Point is, there's just no way of knowing! The Internet is a scary place, and best left alone. Go back to MS Word, where it's safe and warm." />
  <row Id="1872" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1021" RevisionGUID="0946b5d0-8b6c-42c4-95bd-9063ab871ae3" CreationDate="2010-02-20T01:59:20.940" UserDisplayName="random" Text="Your question mentions nothing about where you're going with the website software. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's about some forum recommendation with a couple of specs. In any case, you're asking about running a website. That is not part of Super User.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It does [matter where you're running the thing][1]. Voted to close.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you see similar questions that are still open, feel free to point them out. Would vote to close those as well.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/23573/easily-host-a-mediawiki-locally &quot;and this one fits the bill&quot;" />
  <row Id="1873" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1022" RevisionGUID="c7011add-72bb-43f9-8599-afdaebbda4ab" CreationDate="2010-02-20T20:06:59.220" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="I have re-opened this question. I closed it at 1 in the morning and will admit I made the wrong judgement call on this one and therefore apologize. The questions is valid, however I did leave a comment that it might be more suited for Server Fault based on the type of software on environment you want to use it in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have posted a detailed answer with regards to the policy [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39615/superuser-website-applications-policy/40073#40073) which I would prefer not to repeat." />
  <row Id="1874" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1023" RevisionGUID="7f91be82-9fed-4a8e-b2fb-28877455bda7" CreationDate="2010-02-21T09:04:21.450" Text="This question is problematic from a number of angles -- but most of all I think it is **too localized**, in that you're asking for such a narrow set of conditions that apply only to you, I don't think anyone else in the world would ever get any utility out of this question or any of its potential answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now if you reframed it as &quot;stack overflow clones I can run&quot; that'd actually be better, but it would probably belong here on meta." />
  <row Id="1875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1018" RevisionGUID="26a44c23-4547-4347-9464-a924150f1120" CreationDate="2010-02-20T01:36:23.320" UserDisplayName="OverloadUT" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Superuser website applications policy](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39615/superuser-website-applications-policy)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I recently had a question on Superuser closed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/104025/is-there-any-free-forum-software-that-supports-individual-wiki-posts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Those voting to close it claim that it violated a section of the Superuser FAQ. Specifically this text:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and it is **not about …**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &lt;br&gt; * websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To me, that note means that questions should not be about how to use services like those mentioned. Perhaps it can be extended to mean not to ask questions about what WordPress plugin could accomplish what you need.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But what I asked is not anything like that. I am asking for a piece of software that accomplishes a specific goal. The *only* way it is related to that FAQ entry is that I happen to be looking for a piece of software that will traditionally run on a web server. I don't see it as any different than asking for a video editing program, or a regex checker, or a good free word processor.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do not believe that my questions such as mine are what the SuperUser creators meant when they created that FAQ entry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I misunderstanding the intention of that part of the FAQ? Is asking about software that is traditionally accessed by the end user via the HTTP protocol somehow different than asking about software that executes locally on your computer?" />
  <row Id="1876" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1018" RevisionGUID="26a44c23-4547-4347-9464-a924150f1120" CreationDate="2010-02-20T01:36:23.320" UserDisplayName="OverloadUT" Text="Superuser FAQ note about &quot;websites and web services&quot; is unclear?" />
  <row Id="1877" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1018" RevisionGUID="26a44c23-4547-4347-9464-a924150f1120" CreationDate="2010-02-20T01:36:23.320" UserDisplayName="OverloadUT" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;policy&gt;" />
  <row Id="1878" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1018" RevisionGUID="058b4634-7ec9-406b-86ab-f6a907b6c98d" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:29.363" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/40048/superuser-faq-note-about-websites-and-web-services-is-unclear" Text="" />
  <row Id="1879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1025" RevisionGUID="5ddb3d01-8d88-42f2-a230-c6744c2fb8f3" CreationDate="2010-03-11T16:55:19.920" UserDisplayName="Diago" Text="Molly requested to have her account deleted, and after a cooling down period and an in depth discussion with her by Jeff and the Super User moderators she decided to have her account removed. She is welcome back at any time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;She is the first high reputation user I am aware of to have her account deleted and a definite loss to the community. However everyone needs a break at some point." />
  <row Id="1880" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1024" RevisionGUID="dd8b4ebb-8359-4e2c-9a27-cb6a6bbe2aec" CreationDate="2010-03-11T16:47:58.067" UserDisplayName="ldigas" Text="Being an irregular regular on Super User, I know most of the crew which are also usually the most knowledgeable ones, and the first on the scene, when it comes to answering questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Lately, I haven't seen Molly answering any, and upon checking the user list I find her name missing. It isn't strange for a user to go away, but I find it somewhat unusual in this case, since she was one of the highest &quot;ranking&quot; ones on Super User.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is she gone for good? Anyone?" />
  <row Id="1881" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1024" RevisionGUID="dd8b4ebb-8359-4e2c-9a27-cb6a6bbe2aec" CreationDate="2010-03-11T16:47:58.067" UserDisplayName="ldigas" Text="Where did Molly go?" />
  <row Id="1882" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1024" RevisionGUID="dd8b4ebb-8359-4e2c-9a27-cb6a6bbe2aec" CreationDate="2010-03-11T16:47:58.067" UserDisplayName="ldigas" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="1883" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1024" RevisionGUID="2d24adef-00ed-4ec4-ae8c-ac23083aec3e" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:30.413" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/41886/where-did-molly-go" Text="" />
  <row Id="1884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1026" RevisionGUID="a58756ce-9409-4303-a0da-bd61fd3701e2" CreationDate="2010-03-22T17:46:05.943" UserDisplayName="Spiff" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Slightly darker background color for code blocks](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/43171/slightly-darker-background-color-for-code-blocks)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have a 15&quot; laptop with a quality built-in LCD, but still, some very light colors wash out to where they're barely noticeable. For example the light blue background color used for the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; tag (or four-space indents) on Superuser are pretty much impossible to see.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even using the trick of tilting my screen until the color distorts somewhat, it's still very hard to see that effect. Anyone else having problems seeing the light background colors used in many places?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Clarification:** I don't consider it a duplicate because the grey backgrounds for &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; blocks in all StackExchange sites but Superuser are fine with me, and the most of the non-code blue backgrounds on Superuser are fine. It's just Superuser's &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; block background color that is a super light blue, almost not worth calling blue: #F5FDFF.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's bad enough that I feel like I can't use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; in-line in my text on Superuser because readers won't be able to tell the difference between the command-line arguments I'm referring to, and the text around it. So I'll have to make my posts uglier and less readable by formatting them so &quot;code&quot; (on Superuser, at least for me, this usually means &quot;mentions of command-line tools&quot;) are separated out to their own lines. That's too bad, because there are times when just mentioning a command or two is easier to do and more readable inline with the text." />
  <row Id="1885" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1026" RevisionGUID="a58756ce-9409-4303-a0da-bd61fd3701e2" CreationDate="2010-03-22T17:46:05.943" UserDisplayName="Spiff" Text="Is Superuser's &lt;code&gt; CSS light-blue highlight near invisible on anyone else's laptop LCD?" />
  <row Id="1886" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1026" RevisionGUID="a58756ce-9409-4303-a0da-bd61fd3701e2" CreationDate="2010-03-22T17:46:05.943" UserDisplayName="Spiff" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;css&gt;&lt;color&gt;" />
  <row Id="1887" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1026" RevisionGUID="c553761f-e77f-4ba5-b622-5f94d0b78a6f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:31.490" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/43536/is-superusers-code-css-light-blue-highlight-near-invisible-on-anyone-elses-la" Text="" />
  <row Id="1888" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1028" RevisionGUID="74c44300-d175-4cd8-b2ca-5865f8271d36" CreationDate="2010-03-23T03:24:43.720" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="There are no plans for slack on these, see [here][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39615/superuser-website-applications-policy" />
  <row Id="1889" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1029" RevisionGUID="2c0bebc2-63c3-4249-a498-00579a483dc6" CreationDate="2010-03-23T03:35:36.943" UserDisplayName="Justin 'jjnguy' Nelson" Text="I don't think that voting to close a question should bump it.  That would cause questions deemed unfit for a site to keep bubbling to the top and get more views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the current system is working alright." />
  <row Id="1890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1027" RevisionGUID="55185079-7086-4f7a-ad20-ee8a7ddee152" CreationDate="2010-03-23T03:22:01.863" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Superuser website applications policy](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39615/superuser-website-applications-policy)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;List of **[[google]][1]** or **[[google-calendar]][2]** tagged questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [getting pagerank](http://superuser.com/questions/122467/getting-pagerank)&#xD;&#xA;- [How to use fiddler to customize google search results](http://superuser.com/questions/121287/how-to-use-fiddler-to-customize-google-search-results)&#xD;&#xA;- [How do I add the gadget for Google search on my calendar view?](http://superuser.com/questions/38986/how-do-i-add-the-gadget-for-google-search-on-my-calendar-view)&#xD;&#xA;- [Is there a way to use “Quick Add” to add Tasks in Google Calendar?](http://superuser.com/questions/106839/is-there-a-way-to-use-quick-add-to-add-tasks-in-google-calendar)&#xD;&#xA;- [Copying shared Google Calendar.](http://superuser.com/questions/117748/copying-shared-google-calendar)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First off, commenting on these and issuing a close vote doesn't appear to bounce the question up on the &quot;Active&quot; question tab.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second, are these really off topic? When I think of a &quot;super user&quot; I think of someone that uses computer software, hardware, and other websites. Heck I'm using SO and SU on a daily basis. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;While it's true this is explicitly laid out in the [Super User FAQ][3], I believe some web services have a place here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/google&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/google-calendar&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/faq" />
  <row Id="1891" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1027" RevisionGUID="55185079-7086-4f7a-ad20-ee8a7ddee152" CreationDate="2010-03-23T03:22:01.863" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="Off topic questions on Super User, some give and take?" />
  <row Id="1892" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1027" RevisionGUID="55185079-7086-4f7a-ad20-ee8a7ddee152" CreationDate="2010-03-23T03:22:01.863" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;off-topic&gt;" />
  <row Id="1893" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1027" RevisionGUID="22f261d3-09d1-4465-9072-92998a9a46a8" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:31.673" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/43639/off-topic-questions-on-super-user-some-give-and-take" Text="" />
  <row Id="1894" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1030" RevisionGUID="e5398887-7af9-4ca7-ba91-63fdbc7d3b39" CreationDate="2010-03-29T09:59:40.840" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Superuser website applications policy](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39615/superuser-website-applications-policy)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I suppose that's a loaded question.  Earlier I asked a question on superuser.com about how to use the quick add text box in google calendar, and had it closed as &quot;off topic&quot;.  I do not understand why we're drawing a line between software applications we access through a web interface and apps we access through a fatter client interface.  Seems arbitrary, and not the sort of distinction a user himself would make in the cloud age.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it made good sense for the stackoverflow crew to break the collective computing knowledge pool down into domains of developers, designers, admins, and users.  But it seems to me the user site should be at least as inclusive to legitimate software usage as the original developer site is to anything remotely related to software development.  After all, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/84556/whats-your-favorite-programmer-cartoon&quot;&gt;#2&lt;/a&gt; and #3 most highly voted questions on stackoverflow are about *telling jokes*...but that doesn't inhibit that site from being the best place on the web to get serious answers to anything a developer on any platform could want to know.  To the contrary, surely that general spirit of inclusiveness has helped it become the nexus it is today.  So why are we not aspiring to the same broad goals with the user site?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To extend the point: I could ask a question about writing a smartphone app on stackoverflow, but according to the superuser.com/faq, I can't ask about using a smartphone app on superuser.  Androids are already running everything from an FTP server to a remote desktop client...do I have to hook up a bluetooth keyboard before I can call it a &quot;computer&quot;? :-P  My point is that it's a murky distinction, and ultimately, I believe, a counter-productive one." />
  <row Id="1895" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1030" RevisionGUID="e5398887-7af9-4ca7-ba91-63fdbc7d3b39" CreationDate="2010-03-29T09:59:40.840" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="What's wrong with asking questions about web-based software on Superuser.com?" />
  <row Id="1896" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1030" RevisionGUID="e5398887-7af9-4ca7-ba91-63fdbc7d3b39" CreationDate="2010-03-29T09:59:40.840" UserDisplayName="Dave" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="1897" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1030" RevisionGUID="8cceb3f3-45c0-4345-b437-83a9559f163c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:32.027" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/44404/whats-wrong-with-asking-questions-about-web-based-software-on-superuser-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="1898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1032" RevisionGUID="3c2e3277-26b4-4bb0-86bf-15e8a42e7e79" CreationDate="2010-04-05T17:49:45.210" UserDisplayName="Popular Demand" Text="This issue (and similar issues) has been heavily and thoroughly debated on Meta.  It has resulted in changes to the [faq](http://superuser.com/faq):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and it is not about …  &#xD;&#xA;    * videogames or consoles  &#xD;&#xA;    * websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress  &#xD;&#xA;    * electronic devices, media players, cell phones or smart phones, except insofar as they interface with your computer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may have looked at an old version of the faq somehow, before that was there.  Gmail is generally considered to fall under that second bullet point." />
  <row Id="1899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1033" RevisionGUID="41ff42c0-e643-4cfd-8b7f-c1d1557df807" CreationDate="2010-04-05T17:55:32.590" UserDisplayName="perbert" Text="[![](http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/8890/superuser.png)](http://superuser.com/faq)" />
  <row Id="1900" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1033" RevisionGUID="41ff42c0-e643-4cfd-8b7f-c1d1557df807" CreationDate="2010-04-05T17:55:32.590" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="1901" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1031" RevisionGUID="c851ac5c-3e79-4507-9893-b0c781d23aa0" CreationDate="2010-04-05T17:37:20.527" UserDisplayName="Jitendra" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Superuser website applications policy](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/39615/superuser-website-applications-policy)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/127516/web-cam-symbol-in-gmail-chat-window-closed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is the reason showing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; closed as off-topic by heavyd, random♦&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 5 hours ago 	Questions on Super User&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are expected to generally relate to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computer software or computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in some way, within the scope defined&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in the faq.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;on Super User&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are expected to generally relate to&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computer software or computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt; in some way&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is it means , internet, gmail etc are not comes under Computer software according to SU?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1902" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1031" RevisionGUID="c851ac5c-3e79-4507-9893-b0c781d23aa0" CreationDate="2010-04-05T17:37:20.527" UserDisplayName="Jitendra" Text="why this question get closed on SU which is related to gmail?" />
  <row Id="1903" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1031" RevisionGUID="c851ac5c-3e79-4507-9893-b0c781d23aa0" CreationDate="2010-04-05T17:37:20.527" UserDisplayName="Jitendra" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="1904" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1031" RevisionGUID="f19dc665-182a-43e7-a2e4-c4cb8fbc7c62" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:32.143" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/45556/why-this-question-get-closed-on-su-which-is-related-to-gmail" Text="" />
  <row Id="1905" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1035" RevisionGUID="6dffd900-f47f-4f33-9e2e-f0c51e967702" CreationDate="2010-04-13T20:38:43.783" UserDisplayName="lions_leash" Text="I found it on meta.stackoverflow.  It is the ratio of your questions that have answers that you accepted.  So if you have 5 questions with answers given, and you accepted 4 of them, and the 5th still has available answers you didn't choose, your rate is 80%." />
  <row Id="1906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1034" RevisionGUID="7b21c155-b195-4a5d-9d40-b6fb781db7dd" CreationDate="2010-04-13T20:29:07.127" UserDisplayName="lions_leash" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [How does accepting an answer work?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/5234/how-does-accepting-an-answer-work)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I apologize if this is stupid question or not for this board...  But I keep seeing acceptance rate on this forum.  What is this and how is it calculated?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT - how is the acceptance rate shown on profile?  or is it by default once the numbers are computed?" />
  <row Id="1907" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1034" RevisionGUID="7b21c155-b195-4a5d-9d40-b6fb781db7dd" CreationDate="2010-04-13T20:29:07.127" UserDisplayName="lions_leash" Text="What is Superuser.com acceptance rate?" />
  <row Id="1908" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1034" RevisionGUID="7b21c155-b195-4a5d-9d40-b6fb781db7dd" CreationDate="2010-04-13T20:29:07.127" UserDisplayName="lions_leash" Text="&lt;questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="1909" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1034" RevisionGUID="e31716b6-b771-43ac-b59e-85dd666d582c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:32.530" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/46523/what-is-superuser-com-acceptance-rate" Text="" />
  <row Id="1916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1040" RevisionGUID="996e38e0-46e7-4add-bbf1-514bf6e60ba1" CreationDate="2010-04-23T19:42:01.423" UserDisplayName="Earlz" Text="I hear that Jeff likes waffles.. Figure out his address and send him some waffles. Bribing is **always** the way to go" />
  <row Id="1917" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1041" RevisionGUID="b71fe8bf-cafb-4f4c-97da-edee6e49d81c" CreationDate="2010-04-23T19:43:29.113" UserDisplayName="Ólafur Waage" Text="Create or become a meme, it's a sure fire way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But jokes aside, just be consistent, friendly and helpful. The main thing is that you're there, a lot. If people can think &quot;Hey, this is a great question for X, because he helped me in the past&quot; then you're on your way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another thing. Mod != High rep user. A mod is a person that can be counted on to be there and can be trusted to do their job. So having a history of being awesome helps a lot." />
  <row Id="1918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1042" RevisionGUID="74605a50-2d6b-42b9-a843-e535c4876688" CreationDate="2010-04-23T19:44:01.283" UserDisplayName="Jon B" Text="Being active on SU is more likely to get you noticed than being active on MSO. There are relatively few of us that spend any real time here, and everyone gets just one vote for a moderator." />
  <row Id="1919" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1043" RevisionGUID="50280d0f-b235-45ab-9a7d-dc142cb24ed2" CreationDate="2010-04-23T19:44:09.877" UserDisplayName="Bill the Lizard" Text="Use what abilities you have.  Right now you can vote to close/reopen, edit, and retag.  Do those things effectively and people will start to notice.  You can also flag things for moderator attention to get noticed by the current mods.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Note:** Do these things poorly and you'll naturally be shooting yourself in the foot.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You'll also want to keep asking/answering questions to get your rep up to the 10k level so you can start using *those* tools.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, just be as generally helpful on SU as possible. " />
  <row Id="1920" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1044" RevisionGUID="0e0f0baf-bed2-4f52-84e6-3869aa7acf69" CreationDate="2010-04-23T19:52:48.493" UserDisplayName="Pavel Shved" Text="Put a beaver on your avatar." />
  <row Id="1921" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1039" RevisionGUID="d4d876b4-426a-4a65-81c2-357c73eec3c3" CreationDate="2010-04-23T19:31:44.243" UserDisplayName="th3dude" Text="I'm a pretty avid user of SU. However, I spend most of my time there rather than here in the meta discussions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be very willing and happy to become a moderator there to help even more, but I feel that lack of 'meta activity' would hinder that chance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This isn't a cry for me to become a moderator, but just a general question as to how one can be 'noticed' if they aren't heavy meta users?" />
  <row Id="1922" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1039" RevisionGUID="d4d876b4-426a-4a65-81c2-357c73eec3c3" CreationDate="2010-04-23T19:31:44.243" UserDisplayName="th3dude" Text="How to get 'noticed' to possibly become a moderator?" />
  <row Id="1923" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1039" RevisionGUID="d4d876b4-426a-4a65-81c2-357c73eec3c3" CreationDate="2010-04-23T19:31:44.243" UserDisplayName="th3dude" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;moderators&gt;" />
  <row Id="1924" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1039" RevisionGUID="c39fe226-861b-444e-a48e-e7b0b01c1a8f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:33.467" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/47668/how-to-get-noticed-to-possibly-become-a-moderator" Text="" />
  <row Id="1925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1046" RevisionGUID="da0e493f-ef1e-4d01-ac8e-aee4316027fb" CreationDate="2010-04-25T07:34:45.763" UserDisplayName="Michael Petrotta" Text=" 1. Moderators don't get reputation for closing questions. &#xD;&#xA; 2. You'll need to post links to the questions you're referencing to get any useful answers here. (EDIT: link added)&#xD;&#xA; 3. Personal messaging systems have been discussed, and declined, here before.&#xD;&#xA; 4. This &quot;question&quot; above sounds more like a rant." />
  <row Id="1926" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1047" RevisionGUID="9449880c-d365-4712-ab9a-db0550da7c0a" CreationDate="2010-04-25T07:48:42.153" Text="You are in the right place to discuss the question. Thanks for following up, I wish more users did that!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for your question, I think random was correct to close it as &quot;subjective and argumentative&quot;. It's not really answerable:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Why does Microsoft office and other office suites have their own formats, why don't all processors use HTML? It extremely universal.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can replace the word &quot;HTML&quot; here with anything. Plain text. PDF. XML. Whatever. These are also &quot;extremely universal&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second part is also problematic:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What advantages are they to saving a document as doc/docx over html?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is an invitation to a (rather opinion based) &quot;list of X&quot; question. It's not an actual *problem* you're having, it's just a discussion of people's opinions about why this might be better in some theoretical way .. just because.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bottom line, you should come with **specific questions about specific situations you have at hand** -- those are answerable questions." />
  <row Id="1927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1048" RevisionGUID="6218d6a1-f6cd-4744-bda9-a6e0b61b7f21" CreationDate="2010-04-25T08:16:08.443" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="&gt; I find it extremely annoying that the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; sites are so heavily moderated, and it&#xD;&#xA;&gt; is the biggest downfall of SO and SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moderating is necessary to avoid falling to the &quot;[anything goes][1]&quot; scheme, which in the end helps nobody. There are rules to keep things clean, and people with moderating powers to apply them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, don't take it on a particular moderator. Users with 3000+ reputation can vote to close your question as well, and in my case, I would have (as well as others), for the reasons explained in Jeff's answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Answers" />
  <row Id="1928" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1045" RevisionGUID="b8d1fa77-14ae-42fe-9c17-e05009fbbb9e" CreationDate="2010-04-25T07:25:57.253" UserDisplayName="Jon" Text="A moderator closed [my question][1] for being subjective, when I think is was not. About the differences between doc and HTML.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does he get reputation points for closing questions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I find it extremely annoying that the sites are so heavily moderated, and it is the biggest downfall of SO and SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sorry, this bit was not about Random. and the question was iphone related but then in the comments II asked about whether it was suitable to discuss the ipad on SU, because if it was then the iphone would also be suitable.&#xD;&#xA;For example I can't ask a question about the ipad on SU, as when I did it got closed, so I asked why and he said the device did not run a full OS so it couldn't be asked. But when I then asked what defines a full OS, as you can almost do anything on an iPad that you can do on a laptop, he conveniently didn't reply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some personal messaging system would be great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/134362/why-isnt-html-the-standard-for-word-processing" />
  <row Id="1929" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1045" RevisionGUID="b8d1fa77-14ae-42fe-9c17-e05009fbbb9e" CreationDate="2010-04-25T07:25:57.253" UserDisplayName="Jon" Text="Complain or message to a mod at Super User" />
  <row Id="1930" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1045" RevisionGUID="b8d1fa77-14ae-42fe-9c17-e05009fbbb9e" CreationDate="2010-04-25T07:25:57.253" UserDisplayName="Jon" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;" />
  <row Id="1931" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1045" RevisionGUID="106a2878-13de-43a9-92b8-9b7b672a8fce" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:34.147" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/47797/complain-or-message-to-a-mod-at-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="1932" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1050" RevisionGUID="d8afb0b5-968a-419a-90d7-757b89dc6c8a" CreationDate="2010-04-27T10:15:46.027" UserDisplayName="Jonas" Text="[ForceClose][1] for Android phones, at least.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.forceclose.com/" />
  <row Id="1933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1051" RevisionGUID="145ddcd5-e5d9-4cea-a906-b515a53a08c2" CreationDate="2010-04-27T12:12:30.050" UserDisplayName="Andrew Bolster" Text="It depends on what you're doing with the devices; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if you're talking about programming **for** devices such as phones or pda's, I'd say thats a SO question. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If its problems **using** phones or devices themselves, then the only possibility is the [electronic gadgets site][1]. If your question is about interfacing it with a computer (sync, data transfer, etc), then you can ask it on Super User, but this is the only case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If its problems getting USB hardware to work **with** a computer, SF is a good bet, but again, device specific forums are probably your best bet. Exception being getting data **from** a device, such as GPS, into a computer program, SO is the best place to try.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that you don't state any examples, I'd say put it where you think is apprpriate (given the above) and let the community/moderators migrate it or close it on a case-by-case basis.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope that clears things up!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gadgets.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="1934" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1049" RevisionGUID="9de3ea2c-7a9c-442a-a7ad-109c488714f0" CreationDate="2010-04-27T09:35:22.770" UserDisplayName="Ivan Petrushev" Text="I was wondering where should I post slightly off-topic questions. As I've read on SuperUser its only about computer hardware and software. Do the various USB gadgets fit in the 'hardware' category? What about mobile phones, PDAs, GPSes, etc?" />
  <row Id="1935" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1049" RevisionGUID="9de3ea2c-7a9c-442a-a7ad-109c488714f0" CreationDate="2010-04-27T09:35:22.770" UserDisplayName="Ivan Petrushev" Text="Where should questions about mobile devices, phones, gadgets, etc be asked?" />
  <row Id="1936" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1049" RevisionGUID="9de3ea2c-7a9c-442a-a7ad-109c488714f0" CreationDate="2010-04-27T09:35:22.770" UserDisplayName="Ivan Petrushev" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;" />
  <row Id="1937" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1049" RevisionGUID="87c0ebdb-fbc0-4524-9f5e-ee5d82d1aa19" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:34.757" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/47977/where-should-questions-about-mobile-devices-phones-gadgets-etc-be-asked" Text="" />
  <row Id="1938" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1053" RevisionGUID="407f001b-5d5e-42c4-bb21-16d944b7be56" CreationDate="2010-04-27T20:21:07.347" UserDisplayName="Locutus" Text="This correlates with [this post][1], right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/48013/what-do-i-do-when-a-question-cant-be-answered" />
  <row Id="1939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1054" RevisionGUID="30a9f8e8-548b-42d7-adfc-86fcd2571c10" CreationDate="2010-04-27T21:27:45.253" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="People with moderating powers are not all the time on the site, so there are some questions which are going through. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't hesitate to flag for moderator's attention if you see a question which is off-topic, but can't vote to close yet." />
  <row Id="1940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1055" RevisionGUID="b9e1cdd6-b9aa-4abb-9f6f-38153ba0af6e" CreationDate="2010-04-27T22:14:06.467" UserDisplayName="Sathya" Text="&gt; But in the last few days I have seen&#xD;&#xA;&gt; several &quot;web&quot; questions that didn't&#xD;&#xA;&gt; get closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Taking this quote, and with the example question provided in the link, the question was closed within 3 hours. I'd say that's pretty fast. FWIW I haven't seen an &quot;increase&quot; in the number of web questions being posted - might be the fact that the &quot;closed&quot; word sticks out more might make you believe that there has been a spurt in Web related questions." />
  <row Id="1941" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1052" RevisionGUID="36876a28-898b-4e75-8f80-d5c989b6dc0e" CreationDate="2010-04-27T18:59:48.727" UserDisplayName="Nathaniel" Text="I know they come in now and then, but they were definitely getting closed for a while there. But in the last few days I have seen several &quot;web&quot; questions that didn't get closed. What's going on? Fluke or policy change again?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**: Examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Freely available famous quotes database][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That's all I can find really easily, and it did get closed just now, but I know I've seen a few web questions recently that I was surprised were not closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;Personally I'd like to see a StackExchange 2.0 community spring up for these sorts of questions.&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/135269/freely-available-famous-quotes-database-closed" />
  <row Id="1942" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1052" RevisionGUID="36876a28-898b-4e75-8f80-d5c989b6dc0e" CreationDate="2010-04-27T18:59:48.727" UserDisplayName="Nathaniel" Text="What's with the recent slew of web questions on SU?" />
  <row Id="1943" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1052" RevisionGUID="36876a28-898b-4e75-8f80-d5c989b6dc0e" CreationDate="2010-04-27T18:59:48.727" UserDisplayName="Nathaniel" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;" />
  <row Id="1944" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1052" RevisionGUID="48ac9403-eb1e-4923-a3b4-4a33181a6dae" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:35.190" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/48027/whats-with-the-recent-slew-of-web-questions-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1057" RevisionGUID="bfb54102-c0ac-434b-970e-33f8688d4897" CreationDate="2010-04-30T15:52:33.447" UserDisplayName="Ether" Text="There may have been another reputation recalc instigated on your account recently. This can be triggered by a number of factors, such as someone serial upvoted or downvoted you, or you serial upvoted or downvoted someone else, two accounts were merged, etc.  An SU moderator will be able to check and see if this is the case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At any rate, your reputation report at http://superuser.com/reputation will be the *canonical* record of voting and reputation history on your account. Given that you recall hitting the reputation cap, and now the report only shows a gain of 60 reputation, it's quite possible that some erroneous upvotes were cleaned out by the system." />
  <row Id="1946" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1058" RevisionGUID="24f20ce9-a4b7-4b8a-a6c2-6a3bc9d4c75d" CreationDate="2010-04-30T15:59:23.090" UserDisplayName="Popular Demand" Text="Regarding your Mortarboard badge, here's the relevant snippet from [the official Badge FAQ](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/17853/how-do-badges-work):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;The site admin has stated multiple times that, by design, badges cannot be lost or revoked. There are two exceptions to this rule...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, what happened is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. You hit the rep cap at some point before the recalc.&#xD;&#xA;2. The mechanism for awarding badges saw that, and credited you Mortarboard.&#xD;&#xA;3. After the recalc, you dropped below the cap for that day.&#xD;&#xA;4. Since you didn't actively cheat, you get to keep that Mortarboard forever&#xD;&#xA;5. But, the day for which you were awarded that Mortarboard for will __not__ count towards the Epic or Legendary badges." />
  <row Id="1947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1059" RevisionGUID="512b299b-d352-44d4-82a7-ef4054a0cbd4" CreationDate="2010-05-01T05:51:13.547" Text="The daily vote anomaly detector has kicked in multiple times on your account; the anomalous votes were removed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(This is visible to diamond moderators only in your user history.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should email team@superuser.com for more detail if you want it." />
  <row Id="1948" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1056" RevisionGUID="67bbb144-2388-477e-a6f7-c1e5b30b3330" CreationDate="2010-04-30T15:24:17.943" UserDisplayName="nicorellius" Text="I was somewhat shocked yesterday when the re-calc dropped my rep down ~250 or so (on SU)...  OK, fine.  I read the info and started doing my business.  I hit the max cap of 200 yesterday, after the re-calc, and now today I'm back down again...  Not sure what is going on.  I was under the impression the re-calc would happen and then we could all move forward from there.  Is this not the case?  Are there recurring re-calcs?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's more...  I even got a mortarboard bronze badge...  So that sort of implies that I did hit the cap.  However, when I go to http://superuser.com/reputation it shows that I never hit the cap, and, in fact, yesterday, I only got 60.  Is it possible that the old calcs were used, and then at some point the new calcs were applied?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know, I know...  Many people will say, &quot;Who cares, it's about helping others and getting your own questions answered.&quot;  OK, I get this and I like this.  But it would be nice if I fully knew how it worked.  For a long time, my rep was steady, growing expectantly.  Now, for the last few days, each time I log in it changes +/- 200 points.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="1949" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1056" RevisionGUID="67bbb144-2388-477e-a6f7-c1e5b30b3330" CreationDate="2010-04-30T15:24:17.943" UserDisplayName="nicorellius" Text="Re-Calc Lowerd Rep, Then Activity Raised it, Got Max 200, Then Today Back Down" />
  <row Id="1950" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1056" RevisionGUID="67bbb144-2388-477e-a6f7-c1e5b30b3330" CreationDate="2010-04-30T15:24:17.943" UserDisplayName="nicorellius" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;&lt;rep-recalc&gt;" />
  <row Id="1951" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1056" RevisionGUID="3742a54f-c8a5-4029-a741-775403d4090c" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:36.140" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/48408/re-calc-lowerd-rep-then-activity-raised-it-got-max-200-then-today-back-down" Text="" />
  <row Id="1952" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1061" RevisionGUID="219a77f5-0c2e-4d26-93a7-bcc0a972d1ef" CreationDate="2010-05-05T01:38:02.883" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="Questions about programming for Android should go to [stackoverflow](http://stackoverflow.com).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Otherwise, they are off topic for superuser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42146/android-questions-on-superuser-getting-closed-as-not-computer-related&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/13289/is-asking-phone-questions-permitted-on-superuser&lt;br /&gt;&#xD;&#xA;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42164/can-we-start-a-smartphone-site" />
  <row Id="1953" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1062" RevisionGUID="42f2083d-8195-4dfc-abc2-cefbdfd230f6" CreationDate="2010-07-14T02:17:53.173" UserDisplayName="MGOwen" Text="The Android StackExchange has been around for a while and is fairly active:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://www.forceclose.com/][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.forceclose.com/" />
  <row Id="1954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1063" RevisionGUID="ebd8af86-f616-45e8-9d68-c07ebda6a174" CreationDate="2010-07-14T02:51:54.847" UserDisplayName="jaydles" Text="You're a little early, but I'd expect that this site would be darn near perfect for Android power-users:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/614/electronic-gadgets?referrer=lu78is-6UwU1&#xD;&#xA;(disclosure:  referral link)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It appears to be next in line for a private beta, so if that sort of thing interests you, you can commit now and be eligible for the private beta.   Otherwise, it should be in public beta a week later." />
  <row Id="1955" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1060" RevisionGUID="9791615d-bf87-46d1-8e5f-48ac5c39a6f9" CreationDate="2010-05-05T01:18:12.537" UserDisplayName="Arthur Ulfeldt" Text="Android phones are computers and have power-users who want to make the most of them. Except these power users have been exiled from superuser.com &lt;s&gt;by the evil-tyrant (qq)&lt;/s&gt; and left to ask their questions on inferior sites. where should they go?" />
  <row Id="1956" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1060" RevisionGUID="9791615d-bf87-46d1-8e5f-48ac5c39a6f9" CreationDate="2010-05-05T01:18:12.537" UserDisplayName="Arthur Ulfeldt" Text="where to ask questions about android" />
  <row Id="1957" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1060" RevisionGUID="9791615d-bf87-46d1-8e5f-48ac5c39a6f9" CreationDate="2010-05-05T01:18:12.537" UserDisplayName="Arthur Ulfeldt" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;smartphones&gt;" />
  <row Id="1958" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1060" RevisionGUID="b6f414ae-b4e4-4972-963e-cd282b00b57b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:36.633" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/48767/where-to-ask-questions-about-android" Text="" />
  <row Id="1959" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1065" RevisionGUID="07d826d0-60a1-425f-8846-357c6eb531e3" CreationDate="2010-05-05T03:45:24.477" UserDisplayName="Jonathan Sampson" Text="Hey may need to be warned, officially. It doesn't look like he gets *it* from your edits.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the problems persist, [*I'll greate a GUI interface using Visual Basic - see if I can track an ipaddress.*][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkDD03yeLnU" />
  <row Id="1960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1066" RevisionGUID="b3ed100b-f2fa-495b-aeb6-f9f9ea14aaf5" CreationDate="2010-05-05T06:06:19.497" UserDisplayName="George Edison" Text="This reminds me of the [Jon Skeet incident](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/46512/)." />
  <row Id="1961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1064" RevisionGUID="32676bf2-31ef-45a8-8f7a-be88305be9c9" CreationDate="2010-05-05T03:40:07.790" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="Off of [this question](http://superuser.com/questions/137661/macbook-pro-13-inch-trackpad-makes-very-annoying-sounds-when-clicked/137666#137666).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is a [user](http://superuser.com/users/36110?tab=reputationhistory#tab-top) who has now posted three questions I find offensive to the point where I edited them, and flagged for a mod.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At this point I'm beginning to wonder what he means by &quot;do some moms&quot; as mentioned in [two](http://superuser.com/posts/137666/revisions) of his [posts](http://superuser.com/posts/137662/revisions). His third (and first) [answer](http://superuser.com/posts/137663/revisions) was simply a crude comment to the user about him possibly getting his trackpad sticky after watching porn.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now he has posted a [fourth answer](http://superuser.com/questions/137661/macbook-pro-13-inch-trackpad-makes-very-annoying-sounds-when-clicked/137668#137668) while I was writing this up, and a [fifth](http://superuser.com/questions/137661/macbook-pro-13-inch-trackpad-makes-very-annoying-sounds-when-clicked/137670#137670), [sixth](http://superuser.com/questions/137661/macbook-pro-13-inch-trackpad-makes-very-annoying-sounds-when-clicked/137671#137671), and [seventh](http://superuser.com/questions/137661/macbook-pro-13-inch-trackpad-makes-very-annoying-sounds-when-clicked/137673#137673) afterwards.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**What should be done in this case?**" />
  <row Id="1962" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1064" RevisionGUID="32676bf2-31ef-45a8-8f7a-be88305be9c9" CreationDate="2010-05-05T03:40:07.790" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="Odd poster - offensive answer content - what should I do?" />
  <row Id="1963" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1064" RevisionGUID="32676bf2-31ef-45a8-8f7a-be88305be9c9" CreationDate="2010-05-05T03:40:07.790" UserDisplayName="Josh K" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;support&gt;&lt;offensive&gt;" />
  <row Id="1964" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1064" RevisionGUID="b7114e51-d5ba-48b5-9ef7-0777e4153f7a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:36.987" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/48777/odd-poster-offensive-answer-content-what-should-i-do" Text="" />
  <row Id="1965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1068" RevisionGUID="057cc716-cd32-40db-91c8-2178446ea8a9" CreationDate="2010-05-09T16:26:44.443" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="Done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[multi-boot] and [dual-boot] also need to be merged, but I'm not sure which one needs to be kept.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Much like the more-than-one-monitor tags ([dual-monitors] and [multiple-monitors], which were merged into [multiple-monitors]), we really don't need two different tags for the concept of &quot;more than one&quot;.  I think [multiple-monitors] works pretty well, and I'd prefer to keep [multi-boot] as the more general term.  But I'm afraid [dual-boot] is more common and more widely-known." />
  <row Id="1966" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1067" RevisionGUID="ab9c2aaf-12c8-45fa-8e18-a891a1cf2b29" CreationDate="2010-05-09T15:05:50.467" UserDisplayName="thepurplepixel" Text="It seems kinda redundant to have *booting* and *boot* separate; although one is a verb and one is a noun, it seems like it would be simpler to keep them under one tag (for organization's sake).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm suggesting *bootup* (3) &amp; *booting* (49) -&gt; **boot** (343)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!" />
  <row Id="1967" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1067" RevisionGUID="ab9c2aaf-12c8-45fa-8e18-a891a1cf2b29" CreationDate="2010-05-09T15:05:50.467" UserDisplayName="thepurplepixel" Text="SU Retag request: bootup &amp; booting -&gt; boot" />
  <row Id="1968" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1067" RevisionGUID="ab9c2aaf-12c8-45fa-8e18-a891a1cf2b29" CreationDate="2010-05-09T15:05:50.467" UserDisplayName="thepurplepixel" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1969" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1067" RevisionGUID="9fe2bc92-24a5-4691-80be-05e7fa4c719a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:37.700" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/49352/su-retag-request-bootup-booting-boot" Text="" />
  <row Id="1970" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1070" RevisionGUID="7e95e774-555c-4a03-a23c-e45e20e54267" CreationDate="2010-05-09T22:33:43.653" UserDisplayName="Michael Petrotta" Text="I've seen both types of tagging on SO, and in my opinion, that's just fine.  There's not a reasonable way to automate the behavior you seem to want (are you sure that all instances of `subtype-tag` imply `supertype-tag`?  What about something very specific to Windows XP, that'd not present in any other version of Windows - what help does the `windows` tag provide?).  If the poster feels that a more general tag would be helpful, they should add it, but I think that's true less often than it's not." />
  <row Id="1971" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1071" RevisionGUID="edda9e00-f12c-48ca-9edc-59a0f2ac5146" CreationDate="2010-05-09T23:57:32.557" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="It is currently intentional, though it might be worth reconsidering.  I posted [an earlier question](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/45966/super-user-tagging-convention-ubuntu-and-variants) to consider the tagging convention for Ubuntu versions; that post includes a fairly current breakdown of the major OS tags that are currently in use on SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On Super User, I think tagging questions according to *content* provides the most useful categorization.  I think it's more useful to devote as few tags to the OS as possible, unless the question is particularly about operating systems.  This leaves the other 4 tags for whatever the question is really about.  Customizing a theme?  Image editing?  Media players?  Media format conversion?  Partitioning a hard drive?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think most questions about solving a problem with an OS will be specific to the version of the OS.  Questions asking for software recommendations may be more general, but if you've got a problem with your network driver, it's pretty likely your question and its solutions will depend on what version of your OS you're using.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We certainly *could* stuff all Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows Server 2XYZ, and Windows XP tags into **[windows]** and **[windows-server]** tags, and likewise for Ubuntu, OSX, etc.  (**[osx]** is already the defacto OS tag for Mac OS X; the **[osx-codename]** variants are relatively scarce.)  It would be a simple process to batch-retag the various Windows and Ubuntu tags into their more general category; doing the opposite (splitting the OSX tag into the proper version-specific tags, or making sure everything tagged **[windows-7]** is also tagged **[windows]**) would be completely manual.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind the tag-search wildcards (eg [**[windows~]**][1] *should* allow you to search all the OS variants at once.  This doesn't seem to work quite right when you're trying to filter by a cross-reference of tags (searching for [**[windows~]+[usb]**][2] should find questions tagged **[any-windows-tag]** and **[usb]**, but doesn't)... &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows~&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows~+usb" />
  <row Id="1972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1069" RevisionGUID="5ff4e0bc-4696-4c7e-a040-5f5fce80de5d" CreationDate="2010-05-09T22:24:48.343" UserDisplayName="forget it" Text="On SO it's usual to find a generic tag (such as &quot;android&quot;) together with a more specific tag (such as &quot;android-marketplace&quot;). This, in my opinion, is the correct way to do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On SU however, there are often specific tags (such as &quot;windows-xp&quot;) without the relevant generic tag (&quot;windows&quot;). I found this pretty annoying.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could this be solved, or it's somewhat intentional? (why?)" />
  <row Id="1973" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1069" RevisionGUID="5ff4e0bc-4696-4c7e-a040-5f5fce80de5d" CreationDate="2010-05-09T22:24:48.343" UserDisplayName="forget it" Text="general OS tagging on SU" />
  <row Id="1974" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1069" RevisionGUID="5ff4e0bc-4696-4c7e-a040-5f5fce80de5d" CreationDate="2010-05-09T22:24:48.343" UserDisplayName="forget it" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1975" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1069" RevisionGUID="3f5cdf51-270b-4cf4-b23d-06ccdbae3c5f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:37.927" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/49368/general-os-tagging-on-su" Text="" />
  <row Id="1976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1073" RevisionGUID="995f5582-49f4-4c6b-a854-96385f6aff55" CreationDate="2010-05-11T08:58:00.580" Text="Alex is still working on them. Sorry for the delays.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: they are now shipping as I type this! Visual proof!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;img src=&quot;http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/6522/superuserandserverfault.jpg&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(again, we apologize for the long delay!)" />
  <row Id="1977" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1074" RevisionGUID="1d359584-45ab-44d0-986e-87efc886a0a7" CreationDate="2010-05-11T20:42:41.020" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="I talked to [Alex Papadimoulis][1] and he said there was a delay within the company we are using for fulfillment. T-shirts are going out now and we should be all caught up within the next two weeks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first priority is to get the current orders filled. After that, we are looking at ways to improve the process to make it smoother/quicker. I want my Super User t-shirt!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/users/133733/alex-papadimoulis" />
  <row Id="1978" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1077" RevisionGUID="a7ec04fd-622a-4c95-8029-59cdbe725b19" CreationDate="2010-07-20T16:38:33.750" UserDisplayName="Paolo Bergantino" Text="I'm not sure if this is the proper place, but I was told I was getting a jQuery shirt about 3-4 months now and I've yet to receive it. I did receive my SO shirt, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's hard to complain about not getting free crap, but I am wondering if it is on its way..." />
  <row Id="1979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1075" RevisionGUID="512204c9-4638-4dbc-a650-ef0fbe178c42" CreationDate="2010-05-20T15:15:32.900" UserDisplayName="Randolpho" Text="I have mine. I plan to wear it to a local dev conference in August. " />
  <row Id="1980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1076" RevisionGUID="74835a51-b2e2-4d1b-9d8a-0080e4af6d5a" CreationDate="2010-06-20T03:24:19.117" UserDisplayName="Sathya" Text="Are the T-shirts (still) lost in shipment ? I haven't gotten mine yet." />
  <row Id="1981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1072" RevisionGUID="d3998542-bb58-4675-a9d0-b7875ffb75e2" CreationDate="2010-05-11T08:46:06.350" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="I filled in the form to receive my SuperUser t-shirt on April 8th, but I haven't received it yet. It's been more than a month. Is there any way to learn if it's on its way to Istanbul?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;Today is 28th of June, and I haven't received my t-shirt yet. What took Poirot so long to solve the crime on the train from Paris to Istanbul? I want my t-shirt before the summer's gone..." />
  <row Id="1982" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1072" RevisionGUID="d3998542-bb58-4675-a9d0-b7875ffb75e2" CreationDate="2010-05-11T08:46:06.350" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="Where in the world is my SuperUser t-shirt?" />
  <row Id="1983" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1072" RevisionGUID="d3998542-bb58-4675-a9d0-b7875ffb75e2" CreationDate="2010-05-11T08:46:06.350" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;t-shirt&gt;" />
  <row Id="1984" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1072" RevisionGUID="03f46383-9042-4eed-9df5-b83267a20476" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:38.130" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/49539/where-in-the-world-is-my-superuser-t-shirt" Text="" />
  <row Id="1985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1079" RevisionGUID="298a927a-1481-482b-ad78-5a8ffebbbb23" CreationDate="2010-05-16T21:46:16.613" Text="This should only appear if JavaScript is disabled. View source to see why..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;noscript&gt; &#xD;&#xA;        &lt;div id=&quot;noscript-warning&quot;&gt;Meta Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled&lt;/div&gt; &#xD;&#xA;    &lt;/noscript&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [noscript tag][1] documentation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/interact/scripts.html#h-18.3.1" />
  <row Id="1986" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1078" RevisionGUID="a15613f0-ea14-45fe-b345-b26784edbe58" CreationDate="2010-05-16T18:36:24.047" UserDisplayName="Xavierjazz" Text="I occasionally get a message in Superuser that it works better with Java script enabled. However, when I go to Javascript, it is already enabled.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why would this happen?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm using Windows XP and Firefox version 3.6.3.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT: The same flag has now come up on Meta.&#xD;&#xA;Edit:  I have discovered that this is triggered by some program I have installed in Firefox. I notice that as I get to the end of a page, if ther is another page, a pop-up box appears at the bottom right corner and says: &quot;Loading next page&quot;. Immediately after that, I get the &quot;Javascript message." />
  <row Id="1987" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1078" RevisionGUID="a15613f0-ea14-45fe-b345-b26784edbe58" CreationDate="2010-05-16T18:36:24.047" UserDisplayName="Xavierjazz" Text="I occasionally get a message in Superuser that it works better with Java script enabled." />
  <row Id="1988" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1078" RevisionGUID="a15613f0-ea14-45fe-b345-b26784edbe58" CreationDate="2010-05-16T18:36:24.047" UserDisplayName="Xavierjazz" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;javascript&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;" />
  <row Id="1989" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1078" RevisionGUID="871f222f-65cb-406d-9907-00139ea68da9" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:38.927" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/50095/i-occasionally-get-a-message-in-superuser-that-it-works-better-with-java-script-e" Text="" />
  <row Id="1995" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1083" RevisionGUID="5376ef7d-69d4-4b2f-a4db-ad78adc4deee" CreationDate="2010-05-24T18:42:27.927" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="Actually, Super User has a multiple monitors tag: [**[multiple-monitors]**][1] (435 questions).  This is the tag to use for discussing setups where multiple monitors are being used simultaneously.  We use the [**[monitoring]**][2] tag for questions about monitoring software, but they can be easily confused so it's good to watch out for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Several of the existing **[monitors]** questions already have the **[multiple-monitors]** tag as well, and a couple of the others should have the multiple instead of the singular.  I've fixed those manually, and batch-retagged the **[monitors]** tag into [**[monitor]**][3].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks for finding this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/multiple-monitors&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/monitoring&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/monitor" />
  <row Id="1996" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1082" RevisionGUID="43712da1-2d52-48f5-b553-9509c1e9af70" CreationDate="2010-05-22T00:09:59.057" UserDisplayName="thepurplepixel" Text="Really just a cosmetic thing, I think `[monitors](19)` should be merged into `[monitor](290)`. It makes sense not to fragment the tags based on a plural. I guess, as well, this should be added to the [list of tag synonyms](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/50088/official-repository-of-tag-synonyms) (when it's implemented). Thanks in advance!" />
  <row Id="1997" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1082" RevisionGUID="43712da1-2d52-48f5-b553-9509c1e9af70" CreationDate="2010-05-22T00:09:59.057" UserDisplayName="thepurplepixel" Text="SU Tag Merge Request: [monitors] to [monitor]" />
  <row Id="1998" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1082" RevisionGUID="43712da1-2d52-48f5-b553-9509c1e9af70" CreationDate="2010-05-22T00:09:59.057" UserDisplayName="thepurplepixel" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="1999" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1082" RevisionGUID="f608e283-853a-43fe-a063-53ec4888036a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:39.573" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/50822/su-tag-merge-request-monitors-to-monitor" Text="" />
  <row Id="2000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1085" RevisionGUID="b638b7ed-701e-41ae-ae67-b7b2cb0d79d5" CreationDate="2010-05-24T21:20:30.327" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="While I'd vote for graphics-card and tuner-card, I can't see these working long-term without some kind of tag synonym system." />
  <row Id="2001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1086" RevisionGUID="fb0ee367-ff01-4414-acfc-28ed920a22a5" CreationDate="2010-05-25T03:15:20.430" UserDisplayName="Sathya" Text="video-card(s) / videocard / gpu (if any) =&gt; graphics-card&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general foo-adapter / foo-controller / foocard =&gt; foo-card&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't have the data ready with but I believe most people are likely to search as [foo card] rather than [foo adapter] or [foo controller]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;As for tv-tuner / capture-card / tuner-card -- tv-tuner is the common name and I believe questions related to those should be (re-)tagged as such" />
  <row Id="2002" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1084" RevisionGUID="5b212e76-2229-49f6-8cde-f89f17e2fb80" CreationDate="2010-05-24T21:17:17.390" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="The burning question I need the Super User community to answer is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - ***Which tag should Super User keep?*** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   - [**[videocard]**][1] (173) (if kept, should it be renamed &quot;**[video-card]**&quot;?)&#xD;&#xA;   - [**[graphics-card]**][2] (142)  &#xD;&#xA;   - [**[gpu]**][3] (35) and [**[integrated-graphics]**][4] (13) may deserve merging into whichever tag is decided on.  (Thanks to Essjaaay for the reminder.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;   - [**[tv-tuner]**][5] (41) (if kept, should it be renamed &quot;**[tuner-card]**&quot;?)&#xD;&#xA;   - [**[capture-card]**][6] (6)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Related to this is the general question of how questions about PC components are tagged on Super User.  We have:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [**[network-adapter]**][7] (68) (&quot;**[nic]**&quot; is a synonym)&#xD;&#xA; - [**[sound-card]**][8] (56)&#xD;&#xA; - [**[expansion-cards]**][9] (8)&#xD;&#xA; - [**[raid-card]**][10] (1) (maybe a more general &quot;**[storage-adapter]**&quot; or &quot;**[storage-controller]**&quot; is more useful? &quot;**[storage-card]**&quot; sounds weird.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In general, these tags divorce the type of component from particular implementation details.  I think this is a good thing.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So a question about a USB wireless dongle (w/c/sh)ould be tagged **&quot;[wireless] [usb] [network-adapter]&quot;** instead of &quot;**[usb-wireless-nic]**&quot; (or something similar).  There are already tags for the major buses: [**[isa]**][11], [**[pci]**][12], [**[pci-express]**][13], [**[expresscard]**][14], [**[pcmcia]**][15], [**[usb]**][16], [**[firewire]**][17], [**[sata]**][18], [**[pata]**][19] (there's also [**[ide]**][20] but that's generally used for development environments rather than storage technologies), etc.  (Right now the only major tag that diverges from this (to my current awareness) is [**[usb-flash-drive]**][21], which I think ought to be &quot;**[usb] [flash-drive]**&quot;, but memory storage tags may need to be another discussion.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**However**, calling these components **&quot;cards&quot;** (as in the current **[foo-card]** convention) is really a legacy terminology.  It's common but not always appropriate.  If these were USB devices, we'd probably call them **&quot;adapters&quot;** instead of &quot;cards&quot;.  More specifically, we're usually talking about the *controller chipset* that makes the device do whatever it's supposed to do, so **&quot;controller&quot;** is probably the most accurate term.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**So, in the interest of consistency**:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Should **[network-adapter]** be changed to **[network-card]**?  &#xD;&#xA; - Or should all the **[foo-card]** tags be renamed **[foo-adapter]** or **[foo-controller]**? &#xD;&#xA; - Or is there another solution that will be easy to remember and consistent? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/videocard&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/graphics-card&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/gpu&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/integrated-graphics&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/tv-tuner&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/capture-card&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/network-adapter&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/sound-card&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/expansion-cards&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/raid-card&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/isa&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/pci&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/pci-express&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/expresscard&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/pcmcia&#xD;&#xA;  [16]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/usb&#xD;&#xA;  [17]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/firewire&#xD;&#xA;  [18]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/sata&#xD;&#xA;  [19]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/pata&#xD;&#xA;  [20]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ide&#xD;&#xA;  [21]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/usb-flash-drive" />
  <row Id="2003" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1084" RevisionGUID="5b212e76-2229-49f6-8cde-f89f17e2fb80" CreationDate="2010-05-24T21:17:17.390" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="SU tagging conventions: [videocard] vs [graphics-card], general PC component tags" />
  <row Id="2004" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1084" RevisionGUID="5b212e76-2229-49f6-8cde-f89f17e2fb80" CreationDate="2010-05-24T21:17:17.390" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2005" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1084" RevisionGUID="208fab0a-53bd-4e71-815e-fe59578dd24a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:39.810" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/51041/su-tagging-conventions-videocard-vs-graphics-card-general-pc-component-tags" Text="" />
  <row Id="2006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1088" RevisionGUID="5e89f5f8-86ea-40c1-a1a7-2246e8a6dea6" CreationDate="2010-05-26T06:46:40.333" Text="The latest activity is now linked, so on large questions you can just click it to go to where the &quot;action&quot; was.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(similar to the way it's [linked on the homepage][1])&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/4391/add-link-to-most-recent-activity-of-a-question" />
  <row Id="2007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1087" RevisionGUID="96c377c6-0824-4f85-bba4-6e6f028e819b" CreationDate="2010-05-25T08:20:18.433" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="On other sites, the &quot;latest activity&quot; is a simple link, written the same way as the two previous informations.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On Super User, however, this link has a blue background (which makes it finally quite &quot;flashy&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any reason for this difference, or is it simply a bug?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![screenshot][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i48.tinypic.com/2utg8d5.png" />
  <row Id="2008" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1087" RevisionGUID="96c377c6-0824-4f85-bba4-6e6f028e819b" CreationDate="2010-05-25T08:20:18.433" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="&quot;Latest activity&quot; with a background color on Super User" />
  <row Id="2009" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1087" RevisionGUID="96c377c6-0824-4f85-bba4-6e6f028e819b" CreationDate="2010-05-25T08:20:18.433" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;css&gt;" />
  <row Id="2010" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1087" RevisionGUID="a96ddf0c-7916-4b91-826e-9e6b010ee4f7" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:40.133" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/51081/latest-activity-with-a-background-color-on-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="2011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1090" RevisionGUID="d05271cc-f1be-4377-95a6-d6357165a941" CreationDate="2010-05-30T05:42:52.500" Text="I agree with the closings. The core issue here is that **Super User is not a shopping recommendation site.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Technology questions along the lines of ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &quot;what {hardware class} should I buy now with a budget of ${dollars}?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;... have very little utility beyond the narrow window of time in which they were asked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, with your CPU question, a better formulation would be:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; What CPU characteristics are best for a server?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a much more useful question over time, since you can talk about L2 cache, # of cores, power consumption, and CPU architecture in a way that will be useful to future visitors. And you can cite *current* examples of CPUs in terms of how they may or may not meet those criteria." />
  <row Id="2012" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1091" RevisionGUID="1ae5fa75-0f86-48f1-806b-edc58b8fcb6d" CreationDate="2010-05-30T05:45:20.457" UserDisplayName="waiwai933" Text="Super User does not handle website questions, which is why the first question was closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The second question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- should probably have been on Server Fault because it deals with servers  &#xD;&#xA;- was of such nature that it was a recommendation for purchasing and was too localized in that regards&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regarding item #2, if it was a general request for recommendation (like a firewall rec), that would have been ok. But that question in particular was just a bit too detailed (hence it being closed as 'too localized')." />
  <row Id="2013" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1092" RevisionGUID="e3f83482-5316-4830-911d-c6f71cc704c6" CreationDate="2010-05-30T06:10:08.220" UserDisplayName="Gnome" Text="&quot;Newbie&quot; and &quot;dumb&quot; are [orthogonal](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthogonality#Computer_science) to &quot;too localized&quot; and &quot;off-topic&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Dumb, *on*-topic for SU, too-localized: *How can I delete the entire Windows registry to prevent my spouse from noticing I visit penisland.net?* (Though easily edited to remove the too-localized aspect in this case.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Newbie, off-topic: *Why do my friends laugh at my blonde hair and the whiteout on my screen?*&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2014" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1089" RevisionGUID="54be85d8-f8d2-4d5d-be86-6d1665f881dd" CreationDate="2010-05-30T05:22:17.497" UserDisplayName="Tony_Henrich" Text="&#xD;&#xA;I am getting fed up with some of my questions getting closed on superuser.com. Like this one&#xD;&#xA;[http://superuser.com/questions/142537/website-which-helps-a-user-pick-a-motherboard-closed][1] &amp; [http://superuser.com/questions/144117/which-cpu-for-sql-server-machine-xeon-i5-i7-amd-phenom-closed][2]. It's time to look for another site which is more open minded and have no question police in it. I am not finding superuser.com to be very helpful and it's getting annoying. I find it ironic that a site promotes &quot;no question is too newbie or too dumb&quot; for us but I see a ton of questions which get closed because they're too localized or off topic!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also when you post some kind of hardware question (server related) on serverfault, they tell you to move it to superuser. You post it on superuser, they tell it belongs to server. WELL.. MAKE UP YOUR MIND! I don't have time to follow other people's whims.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/142537/website-which-helps-a-user-pick-a-motherboard-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/144117/which-cpu-for-sql-server-machine-xeon-i5-i7-amd-phenom-closed" />
  <row Id="2015" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1089" RevisionGUID="54be85d8-f8d2-4d5d-be86-6d1665f881dd" CreationDate="2010-05-30T05:22:17.497" UserDisplayName="Tony_Henrich" Text="superuser.com getting useless for me" />
  <row Id="2016" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1089" RevisionGUID="54be85d8-f8d2-4d5d-be86-6d1665f881dd" CreationDate="2010-05-30T05:22:17.497" UserDisplayName="Tony_Henrich" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;" />
  <row Id="2017" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1089" RevisionGUID="aa4a04a3-f795-463d-b606-2d6d9e2d9c85" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:40.290" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/51726/superuser-com-getting-useless-for-me" Text="" />
  <row Id="2018" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1094" RevisionGUID="fdefc296-8f07-4bb0-a2fa-9f86e2480642" CreationDate="2010-05-30T16:42:52.663" UserDisplayName="Lance Roberts" Text="Since the hardware exists and is on the market, I don't see why it would be closed, though Quack is right that it may not get many answers on SU.  I don't think SU has enough of the 'Tom's Hardware' crowd yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it's obviously still a real question." />
  <row Id="2019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1095" RevisionGUID="288b5d6f-bc32-412d-872b-d1d442c56067" CreationDate="2010-05-30T16:44:08.483" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="I'm very suspicious of questions posted about brand-new products.  I admit yours is one of the better-written ones I've seen, but Super User gets a host of awful questions about whatever new technology was just announced, even if it won't be released for months.  Super User is not a product review site, or a discussion board, and most of these new-product questions are more appropriate for one of those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your question's title asks if the new product **&quot;performs better&quot;** than the older tech, and the question body goes on to ask why the older tech wouldn't perform as well.  It has that subjective smell to me.  In particular, you state the new tech seems *&quot;at a glance&quot;* to do what the old tech does, which sounds to me like marketing fluff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So that's my take on the overall class of questions, and why in particular I think it applies to your question.  Thanks for asking this question, though.  If the community or the other Super User moderators reopen it, I'll take this into account when reviewing questions in the future.  I'm happy to get the community's feedback on it." />
  <row Id="2020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1096" RevisionGUID="3c181278-6343-4290-b3de-b831cc20eaab" CreationDate="2010-05-30T16:55:12.470" UserDisplayName="churnd" Text="Yes, the product is new and it's likely the majority of SuperUser members have not actually tried it yet, but there are already a LOT of reviews out there on it, benchmarking it to other drives &amp; applications.  You don't have to have firsthand experience to provide an answer, just knowledge.  Could have very well been one SuperUser member had read an article they could link to &amp; summarize that would answer the question.  I do not think it should have been closed.  At the very least, changed to a wiki." />
  <row Id="2021" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1097" RevisionGUID="42c566b9-9e9b-455a-8834-8b81956ea1c7" CreationDate="2010-05-30T17:04:09.173" UserDisplayName="Robert Harvey" Text="I would certainly be interested to know if anyone has performed some *actual, real-world tests on those hard drives.*  Whether such a query actually belongs on SuperUser is another matter, though.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would think that closing the question because it is speculative is itself speculative.  I found the reason given for moderator closing to be odd.  Surely it could have been left to the community to decide for itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is my opinion that moderators should restrain their actions to those actions where there is a dispute in the community that cannot adequately be resolved by consensus." />
  <row Id="2022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1098" RevisionGUID="6e71d8e2-387d-4451-97ad-50d78f882e46" CreationDate="2010-05-31T03:05:16.107" Text="I have to say that I agree completely with Chris on this. This is a totally appropriate SU question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe what's confusing is the focus on the first specific product of this type (hybrid SSD+HDD) to be released, but .. something had to be first. The bottom line is, it's a really interesting bit of computer technology that deserves discussion.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1093" RevisionGUID="1571faac-5492-4813-9c19-5b04a04b1ea6" CreationDate="2010-05-30T16:26:59.533" UserDisplayName="Chris W. Rea" Text="Can we please discuss whether the closure of my question on SuperUser was reasonable and justified?  It was closed swiftly by a moderator, with a single vote.  Here it is:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[Do Seagate Momentus XT SSD Hybrid drives perform better than a good hard drive + flash on ReadyBoost?][1]**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;p.s. If you think my question should be re-opened, please vote at Super User above if you can.  The moderator that closed it is exercising his right to be stubborn.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;p.p.s.  While you're at it, you might also believe in voting for the following relevant `feature-request` here at meta: **[Add a way for moderators to cast a normal, non binding vote][2]**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/146949/do-seagate-momentus-xt-ssd-hybrid-drives-perform-better-than-a-good-hard-drive&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/41062/add-a-way-for-moderators-to-cast-a-normal-non-binding-vote" />
  <row Id="2024" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1093" RevisionGUID="1571faac-5492-4813-9c19-5b04a04b1ea6" CreationDate="2010-05-30T16:26:59.533" UserDisplayName="Chris W. Rea" Text="SuperUser question about performance of new hybrid HD closed:  Trigger happy mod, or justified?  Please help me re-open my question." />
  <row Id="2025" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1093" RevisionGUID="1571faac-5492-4813-9c19-5b04a04b1ea6" CreationDate="2010-05-30T16:26:59.533" UserDisplayName="Chris W. Rea" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="2026" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1093" RevisionGUID="a58de65a-6d3b-4046-bfb9-bc99ea77c5fe" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:40.890" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/51761/superuser-question-about-performance-of-new-hybrid-hd-closed-trigger-happy-mod" Text="" />
  <row Id="2027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1100" RevisionGUID="1798916b-cfe1-4ec8-9248-92cbaeeec07b" CreationDate="2010-05-31T07:23:42.903" UserDisplayName="S.Mark" Text="I don't think so, he does has comments and downvote (revoked, but from badge), accepted answers on stackoverflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/users/351784?tab=activity#tab-top&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2028" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1101" RevisionGUID="cf75afda-f945-45f1-ba7f-0d772648d7a2" CreationDate="2010-05-31T07:28:18.890" UserDisplayName="Gnome" Text="Looks like quack was very diligently retagging them (damn, good work quickly) and then noticed they were all from the same user... Yeah, it looks questionable to me, too.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Were the questions simply copy-pasted from another forum?  If so, we should definitely discourage that, even though it'd probably be okay if they were instead posted at a rate of 1/day instead of 1/30sec.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;br&gt; &lt;!-- this is an invisible HR --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The display name says it all:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## &amp;nbsp; SamSol&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;ol&quot; is a &quot;p&quot; spun around and separated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## &amp;nbsp; SamSp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now place the 5th letter before the 2nd (those being the first and third prime numbers).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;## &amp;nbsp; Spams&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And if you add up all the digits using hexavigesimal, you get 666..." />
  <row Id="2029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1102" RevisionGUID="49e1f8c7-ebb0-41d7-94d5-aebe6a1c2ca0" CreationDate="2010-07-21T16:46:43.137" UserDisplayName="SamSol" Text="First of all, I can say that I'm not spammer. And 'SamSol' is combination of my name and my surname.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I posted those questions that I could not find answers to from my 10 years of study and research.  I always have innovative questions. Currently I'm an iPhone developer. Don't doubt about me. I'm always helpful.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2030" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1099" RevisionGUID="860a8943-0c07-4b67-afc4-81bfb65f2fc7" CreationDate="2010-05-31T07:16:26.597" UserDisplayName="Sathya" Text="Is this [user][1] a Spambot? ~10 questions in a span of about 5 minutes o_0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/38742/samsol" />
  <row Id="2031" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1099" RevisionGUID="860a8943-0c07-4b67-afc4-81bfb65f2fc7" CreationDate="2010-05-31T07:16:26.597" UserDisplayName="Sathya" Text="Is this user a SpamBot?" />
  <row Id="2032" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1099" RevisionGUID="860a8943-0c07-4b67-afc4-81bfb65f2fc7" CreationDate="2010-05-31T07:16:26.597" UserDisplayName="Sathya" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="2033" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1099" RevisionGUID="0f7820d6-fa90-438e-964a-08419e6a275b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:41.810" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/51808/is-this-user-a-spambot" Text="" />
  <row Id="2034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1104" RevisionGUID="42574fa0-35af-4cad-a254-fd487afa07e0" CreationDate="2010-05-31T08:41:08.647" UserDisplayName="alex" Text="Yes, it should be added. It's hard to offer recommendations and it's almost always subjective.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are also incredibly limited in scope, because most people just want to find out if [*insert obscure product A*] is better than [*insert never-before-heard-of product B*]. These shopping questions simply clutter up the site. I'm not sure such a topic would fit even a Stack Exchange website..." />
  <row Id="2035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1105" RevisionGUID="722e94ad-fc3c-49be-a157-5067bccb9f7e" CreationDate="2010-05-31T11:02:19.957" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="I'd like to reiterate my basic acid-test for what-constitutes-an-offtopic-shopping-question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Does the question ask *where can I buy* or *how much do I spend*?  **Offtopic.**  &#xD;&#xA; (The example Gnoupi quotes in this post fails this test.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I'm still stuck on what to do with all the questions that ask for full-fledged systems or the best laptops to do web developing (or whatever) on.  Unless they fail the first test by asking where to buy or including budgetary constraints, the only reason I can give for closing these is *&quot;not a discussion forum&quot;*.   &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &lt;sup&gt;(So I usually pretend I didn't see them and leave them for @random to close...)&lt;/sup&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Does the question ask *what {hardware component, class of product, peripheral} meets this technical requirement*?  **Ontopic.**  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Especially for uncommon things.  It might be useful to restrict this to individual components, not full systems.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Some of these can be especially enlightening for computer builders or similar.  Asking about what adapter cables to use for a job, or what case mounting brackets to fit a 2.5&quot; SSD into a MiniXYZ case, seems to me to be an integral part of what Super User is for: **educating computer enthusiasts about pimping their PC**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Answers to such questions shouldn't point out where to buy, but should educate the asker about what kinds of products are out there, and what terms to look for when they do go shopping.  Listing manufacturers and model names and including product pictures is important.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Example of this kind of question:  &#xD;&#xA;   [Internal USB A Female to motherboard 4-pin that mounts internally](http://superuser.com/questions/128690/internal-usb-a-female-to-motherboard-4-pin-that-mounts-internally)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1106" RevisionGUID="5b938eea-1b09-42c4-bdea-3ea24be7168c" CreationDate="2010-06-02T05:21:16.607" Text="ok, the &quot;it is not about&quot; section now reads:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - videogames or consoles&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - electronic devices, media players, cell phones or smart phones, except insofar as they interface with your computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - a shopping or buying recommendation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2037" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1103" RevisionGUID="22e2675d-a72c-4ba2-a19e-c75a1780b818" CreationDate="2010-05-31T08:11:51.487" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="As [discussed several times][1], shopping questions are off-topic on Super User.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They are too specific, related to a particular time, a particular place, and are also open to subjectivity (advising &quot;which is best&quot; is likely to gather mostly personal opinions).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is widely accepted amongst people moderating that SU is not the shopping channel, and questions are being closed. However, we face often misunderstanding from people whose question has been closed, because it's not clearly explained why.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Should we include a new &quot;exception&quot; line, to the SU FAQ?** (with the risk of making it even more crowded):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and it is not about …&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - videogames or consoles&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - electronic devices, media players, cell phones or smart phones, except&#xD;&#xA;&gt; insofar as they interface with your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - **shopping recommendation**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(*we could add this example from Jeff, also: &quot;what {hardware class} should I buy now with a budget of ${dollars}?&quot;*)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/51726/superuser-com-getting-useless-for-me/51727#51727" />
  <row Id="2038" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1103" RevisionGUID="22e2675d-a72c-4ba2-a19e-c75a1780b818" CreationDate="2010-05-31T08:11:51.487" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="Should we add a &quot;no shopping recommendation&quot; clause to the Super User FAQ?" />
  <row Id="2039" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1103" RevisionGUID="22e2675d-a72c-4ba2-a19e-c75a1780b818" CreationDate="2010-05-31T08:11:51.487" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;faq-update-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2040" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1103" RevisionGUID="5c7cdab9-ac96-4c87-b9e6-29a180dd60a3" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:42.530" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/51813/should-we-add-a-no-shopping-recommendation-clause-to-the-super-user-faq" Text="" />
  <row Id="2046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1110" RevisionGUID="f044b68b-07aa-4659-a060-9fc127200332" CreationDate="2010-06-01T14:42:13.467" UserDisplayName="balpha" Text="[Ewoks](http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/07/super-user-semi-private-beta-begins/). &lt;!-- --&gt;" />
  <row Id="2047" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1110" RevisionGUID="f044b68b-07aa-4659-a060-9fc127200332" CreationDate="2010-06-01T14:42:13.467" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2048" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1111" RevisionGUID="bb7edeb1-8464-4d38-8df8-3c8f7e3810b0" CreationDate="2010-06-01T14:43:02.197" UserDisplayName="mmyers" Text="Super users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- --&gt;" />
  <row Id="2049" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1111" RevisionGUID="bb7edeb1-8464-4d38-8df8-3c8f7e3810b0" CreationDate="2010-06-01T14:43:02.197" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2050" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1112" RevisionGUID="4f901d4e-5310-4e13-a991-bef7ded691bd" CreationDate="2010-06-01T14:49:22.447" UserDisplayName="Gnome" Text="SUdoers&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Remember the [sudo](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudo) command grants administrative, or &quot;super&quot;, privileges." />
  <row Id="2051" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1112" RevisionGUID="4f901d4e-5310-4e13-a991-bef7ded691bd" CreationDate="2010-06-01T14:49:22.447" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1113" RevisionGUID="74f66afb-89b2-408f-8792-4eb0fc6f61c9" CreationDate="2010-06-01T14:57:44.560" UserDisplayName="Robert Cartaino" Text="*...then for consistency I have to repeat my answer:*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oh, good lord. Please, no. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The day someone starts labeling Super User user as &quot;Supee&quot; or a &quot;SU-er&quot; or a &quot;Super Badgie&quot; ... is the day I start *anonomous-izing* my account. Can you say &quot;pop-culture-burnout, jumping-the-shark&quot;?" />
  <row Id="2053" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1113" RevisionGUID="74f66afb-89b2-408f-8792-4eb0fc6f61c9" CreationDate="2010-06-01T14:57:44.560" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2054" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1114" RevisionGUID="9d19eb73-ee0f-461e-9890-32e891021d03" CreationDate="2010-06-01T15:08:02.853" UserDisplayName="Bill the Lizard" Text="Super Troopers." />
  <row Id="2055" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1114" RevisionGUID="9d19eb73-ee0f-461e-9890-32e891021d03" CreationDate="2010-06-01T15:08:02.853" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2056" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1109" RevisionGUID="4ec2cb83-192f-4905-959d-fb2a113755aa" CreationDate="2010-06-01T14:41:17.993" UserDisplayName="Popular Demand" Text="This is one of those &quot;shameless ripoff for consistency reasons&quot; questions.  Back in September 2008, someone asked [&quot;What should the users of Stack Overflow be called?&quot;][1].  In mid-2009, we got [&quot;What should contributors to Server Fault be called?&quot;][2].  There's no equivalent Super User question yet, so... here it is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Oddly, the SO question is `[discussion]` and `[fun]` while the SF question is the big red `[faq]`.  I'm not sure which direction to go with the tagging on this question... discussion on that in the comments is welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm going to try something interesting here &amp;#8212; a poll with strict requirements for answers. Here are the rules. Note &amp;#8212; posts may be edited if they are out of compliance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  - Your post must contain only your desired answer&#xD;&#xA;  - You must not duplicate an answer&#xD;&#xA;  - If you do accidentally duplicate an answer, it's your responsibility to delete it. Otherwise, it will be edited to say something along the lines of &quot;I can't follow directions.&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  - Observers should vote up the names they like&#xD;&#xA;  - Discussion should occur in the comments&#xD;&#xA;  - The answer with the highest number of votes will be accepted as the official answer&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(_Users who have not been under a rock since 2008 will note that these are the ancestors of the current_ de facto _official poll rules._)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So... what should we, the users of Super User, be called?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/6254/what-should-the-users-of-stack-overflow-be-called&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11048/what-should-contributors-to-serverfault-be-called&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2057" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1109" RevisionGUID="4ec2cb83-192f-4905-959d-fb2a113755aa" CreationDate="2010-06-01T14:41:17.993" UserDisplayName="Popular Demand" Text="What should the users of Super User be called?" />
  <row Id="2058" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1109" RevisionGUID="4ec2cb83-192f-4905-959d-fb2a113755aa" CreationDate="2010-06-01T14:41:17.993" UserDisplayName="Popular Demand" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;nomenclature&gt;" />
  <row Id="2059" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1109" RevisionGUID="4ec2cb83-192f-4905-959d-fb2a113755aa" CreationDate="2010-06-01T14:41:17.993" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2060" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1109" RevisionGUID="81caf556-f508-41f7-b5e2-258b61a03857" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:43.027" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/51956/what-should-the-users-of-super-user-be-called" Text="" />
  <row Id="2061" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1116" RevisionGUID="a383eaaa-bf1c-40bd-9633-f3513d61cb40" CreationDate="2010-06-03T06:20:37.377" UserDisplayName="Gnome" Text="### [apple-mail]&#xD;&#xA;*[company-product]* is a popular convention, and seems to work well.  However, people tend to avoid it for wide swaths of Microsofts product line, perhaps unnecessarily so.  MSFT tends to use very generic names that could be useful in other contexts; e.g. [windows], [sql-server]. Compare [google-chrome] to [chrome] (meaning a UI aspect).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Go with [apple-mail]; [apple-mail.app] could work, but is probably too long.  However, I'm not a Mac user to judge which fits in better between the two." />
  <row Id="2062" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1115" RevisionGUID="8b9dbad3-b6b9-407a-9c56-7ad4487b2db5" CreationDate="2010-06-03T05:43:27.970" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="The various email tags caught my attention and I started looking to see if the **[mail]** tag can be gotten rid of.  It seems to have a few uses:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. generic stand-in for **[email]** or **[mail-server]**;&#xD;&#xA;2. specific-name tag for Mail.app / Apple Mail / Mail, the default OS X email client; this usage also has tags **[apple-mail]** and **[mail.app]**;&#xD;&#xA;3. (well, i thought there was a snailmail question in there somewhere, but i'm missing it...)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's the tag links and numbers we're looking at:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [**[email]**][1] (557)&#xD;&#xA;- [**[mail-server]**][2] (8)&#xD;&#xA;- [**[mail]**][3] (65)&#xD;&#xA;- [**[mail.app]**][4] (67)&#xD;&#xA;- [**[apple-mail]**][5] (10)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I need to know:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. It seems obvious to me that **[mail.app]** and **[apple-mail]** are the same thing and should be merged.  I think **[apple-mail]** may be clearer.  What does the community think?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. The **[mail]** tag should be eliminated, but that's a 2-part job:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  1. First, someone needs to go through the list manually to retag **[mail]** to **[apple-mail]** or **[mail.app]** on those questions it's appropriate to.  Start with the searches [**[mail]+[osx]**][6] and [**[mail]+[mac]**][7].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     Another pass might be desirable to get questions that should be tagged **[mail-server]**, if any.  (I'm uncertain whether this tag is necessary; it isn't widely used.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  2. Once that's done, the remaining **[mail]** tag can be merged into **[email]**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thoughts?  Opinions?  ...Volunteers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/email&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/mail-server&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/mail&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/mail.app&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/apple-mail&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/mail+osx&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/mail+mac" />
  <row Id="2063" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1115" RevisionGUID="8b9dbad3-b6b9-407a-9c56-7ad4487b2db5" CreationDate="2010-06-03T05:43:27.970" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="SU retagging: [mail], [apple-mail], [mail.app]" />
  <row Id="2064" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1115" RevisionGUID="8b9dbad3-b6b9-407a-9c56-7ad4487b2db5" CreationDate="2010-06-03T05:43:27.970" UserDisplayName="quack quixote" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2065" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1115" RevisionGUID="93a11ec0-779b-451b-bb76-657e3c16ae53" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:43.740" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/52296/su-retagging-mail-apple-mail-mail-app" Text="" />
  <row Id="2076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1124" RevisionGUID="7c055887-a6c6-430f-b9e1-a0001564ce8f" CreationDate="2010-06-03T20:29:11.007" UserDisplayName="Lloyd Budd" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Questions about WordPress on Super User](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/44513/questions-about-wordpress-on-super-user)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I see a number of superuser.com WordPress threads closed as &quot;closed as off-topic&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the [FAQ](http://superuser.com/faq) I see &quot;websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That FAQ entry should be updated to &quot;WordPress.com&quot;. WordPress is ambiguous and also refers to the CMS software downloaded from [WordPress.org](http://wordpress.org/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Further, &quot;Web design and HTML/CSS layout, and your job title is &quot;designer&quot;, ask on Doctype.&quot; should be updated to include &quot;Web Design/Hosting/CMS&quot; as listed at &quot;[Where can I ask questions that aren’t Super User questions?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/41570/where-can-i-ask-questions-that-arent-super-user-questions)&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you,  &#xD;&#xA;Lloyd Budd  &#xD;&#xA;WordPress contributor" />
  <row Id="2077" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1124" RevisionGUID="7c055887-a6c6-430f-b9e1-a0001564ce8f" CreationDate="2010-06-03T20:29:11.007" UserDisplayName="Lloyd Budd" Text="WordPress is off-topic" />
  <row Id="2078" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1124" RevisionGUID="7c055887-a6c6-430f-b9e1-a0001564ce8f" CreationDate="2010-06-03T20:29:11.007" UserDisplayName="Lloyd Budd" Text="&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="2079" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1124" RevisionGUID="450fce82-6bfc-4104-a10a-a0749156fee0" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:45.683" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/52428/wordpress-is-off-topic" Text="" />
  <row Id="2080" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1126" RevisionGUID="f0e7be1b-0b6a-4960-a364-29b50db30ddd" CreationDate="2010-06-10T13:35:31.733" UserDisplayName="Gnoupi" Text="I would say that *Ubuntu* is at same time too wide and not enough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When asking about hidden features for Ubuntu, you will end with answers matching to Linux in general, or particular programs used by this or that distribution. So it's too narrow, because it should extend to whole Linux, and at same time too wide, because extending to plenty of pieces of software you can identify.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When asking about &quot;hidden features of Vista&quot;, you can't single out really parts of it. By its nature, it's a monolith: the desktop manager, the file manager, everything is included in this monolith.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As opposed to Linux, where the desktop manager is not only used by different distributions, but as well changeable for the same distribution. Same for most of parts. It's hard to give a list of &quot;hidden features&quot;, for a system on which you can potentially change all of its parts." />
  <row Id="2081" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1127" RevisionGUID="6abbf4da-95e7-49b2-84da-16bca2b6f96b" CreationDate="2010-06-10T13:36:18.640" UserDisplayName="Andy E's head" Text="As quack quixote mentioned in the comments to your question, &quot;poll&quot; questions are discouraged from the trilogy sites because there is no solid &quot;correct&quot; answer, people just vote for the ones they like the most.  Unfortunately for you, you picked a topic **that was less favourable** to the community browsing the site at the time you posted it, hence the quick close and down votes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FYI, If you look at the [revisions for the Windows Vista question](http://superuser.com/posts/12450/revisions), you'll see that it was &quot;locked&quot; and &quot;unlocked&quot; several times over. " />
  <row Id="2082" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1128" RevisionGUID="3ebd12ce-bc09-40ec-b0ac-3c77cfeae562" CreationDate="2010-06-10T13:40:23.713" UserDisplayName="squillman" Text="In addition to Andy's response, and this is just a hunch, here are a couple of other thoughts on this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. The Vista question was asked about a year ago when things were still settling down after SU was launched.  Could be that the community attitude toward these types of questions has shifted since.  The locking activity that Andy mentions could be an indication of this.&#xD;&#xA;2. The Vista question had a bounty set on it (indicated by the gold border around the accepted check mark).  Bounty questions can't be closed or deleted during the bounty period (short of mod interaction).  May be that people decided to bypass it during the bounty period and then never came back to it.  The bounty was set on it a couple of months after the question was asked, so maybe it was set to prevent it from being closed.  I've seen that strategy used before with varying success." />
  <row Id="2083" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1129" RevisionGUID="075c087b-f69d-45d7-9030-980ad4930afa" CreationDate="2010-06-10T13:41:10.120" UserDisplayName="Nifle" Text="I can only answer for my vote.  &#xD;&#xA;The secrets you had as example was **so very basic** (how tab completion works and how to copy/paste in a terminal). I could not on that basic take your question serious and felt that it had no merit being on SU." />
  <row Id="2084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1130" RevisionGUID="d178444a-5cbf-4518-823f-bc4a76261f4d" CreationDate="2010-06-10T13:49:15.893" UserDisplayName="Gnome" Text="&quot;Hidden features&quot; is a series of poll &quot;questions&quot;, without being answerable questions in the sense that Super User is a Q&amp;A site, that started on SO and is now largely discouraged.  Due to popularity, older &quot;hidden features&quot; questions are kept, even though they make poor questions, though I believe they should probably be closed and locked to avoid [copycats](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/52456/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also see the comment on your question:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; poll-style questions like this are discouraged; they are better suited to discussion forums. Super User is designed for more concrete questions. a question like superuser.com/questions/149055/… is a bit more palatable because it's restricted to the uses of a single program. as @hotei's answer points out, none of your own examples are particularly &quot;hidden features&quot; of Ubuntu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I hope everyone changes their minds, because I just posted 50 &quot;hidden features&quot; questions on Super User:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Edubuntu 10.04 LTS&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Windows for Workgroups 3.11&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Vim&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Emacs&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Geany&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Google Chrome&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Opera&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Firefox&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Mosaic&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of XChat&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Screen&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Less&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Sed&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Ed&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of the Magnetic Needle&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of Butterflys&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of parsing HTML with regex&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of insanity&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of pharmacology drug abuse&#xD;&#xA;- Hidden features of god, where does it end?" />
  <row Id="2085" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1131" RevisionGUID="db9aaf61-2dba-4314-88b5-2803ddd8ce1a" CreationDate="2010-06-11T12:52:02.743" UserDisplayName="Binoj Antony" Text="Many of the `Hidden Features` question brings out hidden gems and hence adds good view value to it.  &#xD;&#xA;Check for example the [Hidden Features of HTML][1].  &#xD;&#xA;I have been working in HTML since 1998. Still I had no idea about the first 3 answered features.  &#xD;&#xA;I am willing to bet that most of you did not know at least one of them, please comment honestly!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/954327/hidden-features-of-html&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2086" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1125" RevisionGUID="ee1ae49c-3a00-4d81-a4d0-26015c4d791b" CreationDate="2010-06-10T13:24:17.543" UserDisplayName="Tom Brito" Text="I'm asking this because a question about [hidden features of Windows Vista][1] was allowed, while mine about [hidden features of Ubuntu][2] was not. I'm wondering why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/12450/hidden-features-of-windows-vista&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/150746/hidden-features-of-ubuntu" />
  <row Id="2087" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1125" RevisionGUID="ee1ae49c-3a00-4d81-a4d0-26015c4d791b" CreationDate="2010-06-10T13:24:17.543" UserDisplayName="Tom Brito" Text="Are &quot;hidden features&quot; questions allowed in super user?" />
  <row Id="2088" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1125" RevisionGUID="ee1ae49c-3a00-4d81-a4d0-26015c4d791b" CreationDate="2010-06-10T13:24:17.543" UserDisplayName="Tom Brito" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2089" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1125" RevisionGUID="81971e33-4421-4f70-b774-5df17957b227" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:45.880" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/53180/are-hidden-features-questions-allowed-in-super-user" Text="" />
  <row Id="2090" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1133" RevisionGUID="1128a6fb-aecc-4007-bb85-56421fc91a46" CreationDate="2010-06-12T00:04:53.000" Text="Let's say Super User was a site about automobiles.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Just because you like to listen to the radio in your car, does not mean the automobile site is about radio stations.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Radio *hardware* (aka the Web Browser) is on topic, but not the radio stations (Web Sites) you tune in with them. There needs to be a separate site for radio listening enthusiasts -- there's absolutely nothing wrong with people who love to listen to the radio, and view radio listening as the primary function of their automobile -- but that's a *fundamentally different community* than car nuts.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(In other words, unless your computer effectively stops functioning when disconnected from the internet -- it's not a core function. I realize this day is coming, but until we're there, I support SU as the &quot;car nuts&quot; computer site, not the &quot;I loves tuning me in some radio stations&quot; computer site.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, I fully support [a proposal for a site about web applications][1], I think we need one -- but broadening the already-too-broad-scope of Super User is not a forumula for success.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/57/web-applications" />
  <row Id="2091" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1132" RevisionGUID="30a8163d-73cf-41a1-af8f-9ad611185d9c" CreationDate="2010-06-11T21:55:21.600" UserDisplayName="Andy White" Text="My question here has to do with the off-topic restrictions in Superuser.  It seems that any question related to web applications is closed immediately as &quot;off-topic.&quot;  I didn't realize these were off-limits until I was directed to read the FAQ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is the main purpose for restricting web-application questions from superuser?  I assume you could ask a question about Microsoft Word on Superuser, because it doesn't specifically disallow questions about desktop software, but what's the difference?  Can I ask a question about Excel, but not Google Docs Spreadsheets?  I guess the ultimate question is:  what specific community is superuser targeting with these restrictions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I asked a question about Last.fm plugins for WordPress, and it was closed immediately.  If I was asking about how to *write* a last.fm plugin for Wordpress, would that be allowed?  (In that case, I'd probably ask on Stackoverflow... but anyway)  Or are any questions related to Wordpress strictly off-limits?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My other qualm with these moderation trends is that you often get redirected to some external Q&amp;A site or forum, or are told that there might be a stack exchange site coming for that topic.  Personally, I'm not really interested in joining 10 different segmented communities, just to ask one computer-software related question.  Moreover, the more specific and segmented the stack exchange site is, the fewer users it will have, and the usefulness goes down exponentially.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, I vote to redo the FAQ for superuser to allow a broader range of computer/software questions!" />
  <row Id="2092" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1132" RevisionGUID="30a8163d-73cf-41a1-af8f-9ad611185d9c" CreationDate="2010-06-11T21:55:21.600" UserDisplayName="Andy White" Text="Superuser off-topic restrictions" />
  <row Id="2093" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1132" RevisionGUID="30a8163d-73cf-41a1-af8f-9ad611185d9c" CreationDate="2010-06-11T21:55:21.600" UserDisplayName="Andy White" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2094" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1132" RevisionGUID="c43da3d2-a7df-44ad-bac9-e340935cfb6a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:47.403" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/53386/superuser-off-topic-restrictions" Text="" />
  <row Id="2095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1135" RevisionGUID="9ff2de40-cad8-400e-a0c5-037c4e37a763" CreationDate="2010-06-16T23:23:10.653" Text="We had a little moderator ... accident ... and all the windows-xp tags were destroyed. It'll be a day or two before I have time to put together triage.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok, this is fixed. Luckily a space was left behind so I could use it to detect where the old [windows-xp] tag was supposed to go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We'll improve the moderator tools to make this more .. difficult .. to do accidentally, in the future." />
  <row Id="2096" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1134" RevisionGUID="605926f8-63e6-4626-bd2c-86b1db0549c2" CreationDate="2010-06-16T23:05:24.700" UserDisplayName="Sathya" Text="I noticed this while retagging a question, a search for questions tagged `[windows-xp]` returns [12 questions][1], so why is the tagging area indicating [that there are no questions][2] tagged `[windows-xp]` ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/ot: There are ONLY 12 questions tagged `[windows-xp]` o_0&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.imagecross.com/11/image-hosting-view-38.php?id=5423windows-xp-search.PNG&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://www.imagecross.com/11/image-hosting-view-38.php?id=5701tagged.PNG" />
  <row Id="2097" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1134" RevisionGUID="605926f8-63e6-4626-bd2c-86b1db0549c2" CreationDate="2010-06-16T23:05:24.700" UserDisplayName="Sathya" Text="Why is Windows XP tag showing zero questions ?" />
  <row Id="2098" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1134" RevisionGUID="605926f8-63e6-4626-bd2c-86b1db0549c2" CreationDate="2010-06-16T23:05:24.700" UserDisplayName="Sathya" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="2099" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1134" RevisionGUID="bc01332f-a1b0-4901-bebf-071be2c17cdb" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:48.277" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/53921/why-is-windows-xp-tag-showing-zero-questions" Text="" />
  <row Id="2100" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1137" RevisionGUID="6d682f2a-e0fb-4ebc-8e97-fbfd2c8a858c" CreationDate="2010-06-25T16:49:10.253" UserDisplayName="Bob" Text="It seems [a new site][1] for these sorts of issues is destined to come to life&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/57/web-applications" />
  <row Id="2101" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1138" RevisionGUID="126efd8a-930b-4f44-8c32-cca891ade9c2" CreationDate="2010-06-25T16:51:09.730" UserDisplayName="jaydles" Text="Here are proposals on Area51 that might cover your needs if they are launched:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Web Apps Site**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/57/web-applications?referrer=cim4F0_TQeo1&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google Site**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/1318/google?referrer=SwZU-ceNHZ41&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Disc:  Referral links)" />
  <row Id="2102" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1136" RevisionGUID="f04e4a61-8abf-4091-9a54-95438c1933ba" CreationDate="2010-06-25T16:44:44.600" UserDisplayName="mpassell" Text="I was about to ask a question on Super User about problems I've been having accessing Google Groups, but then I noticed that *a lot* of questions on that site having to do with web apps were being closed as not relevant.  If that's the case, what would be the right place to ask the question?  If there's a different site in the Stack Overflow family that would be appropriate, it would be good for the users/admins of Super User to send people to that site." />
  <row Id="2103" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1136" RevisionGUID="f04e4a61-8abf-4091-9a54-95438c1933ba" CreationDate="2010-06-25T16:44:44.600" UserDisplayName="mpassell" Text="Appropriate site for question about Google Groups?" />
  <row Id="2104" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1136" RevisionGUID="f04e4a61-8abf-4091-9a54-95438c1933ba" CreationDate="2010-06-25T16:44:44.600" UserDisplayName="mpassell" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;" />
  <row Id="2105" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1136" RevisionGUID="33b8c8b7-b613-4fbf-8256-f9a2ada94113" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:48.863" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/55039/appropriate-site-for-question-about-google-groups" Text="" />
  <row Id="2106" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1139" RevisionGUID="bb496378-496a-49d4-b594-360f611ed99f" CreationDate="2010-06-29T09:14:59.973" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="Can the following tag groups on SuperUser be merged?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [**install**] (x239), [**installation**] (x393),&#xD;&#xA;   [**installing**] (x4), [**installed**] (x1).&#xD;&#xA; - [**installer**] (x48), [**installers**] (x2).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2107" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1139" RevisionGUID="bb496378-496a-49d4-b594-360f611ed99f" CreationDate="2010-06-29T09:14:59.973" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="SU tag merge request: [install] related" />
  <row Id="2108" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1139" RevisionGUID="bb496378-496a-49d4-b594-360f611ed99f" CreationDate="2010-06-29T09:14:59.973" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2109" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1139" RevisionGUID="c4e04ab9-7150-424f-9a2d-3e9c3a88d91b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:49.147" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/55314/su-tag-merge-request-install-related" Text="" />
  <row Id="2110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1141" RevisionGUID="7dad1bb2-ca50-46e7-a81b-92d2956075cc" CreationDate="2010-07-02T20:30:22.403" UserDisplayName="Juan Manuel" Text="Because you don't have 1000 reputation yet.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;See [here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/8211/hidden-features-of-stack-overflow/31491#31491" />
  <row Id="2111" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1140" RevisionGUID="f17b9881-421c-4e3a-a531-ec863188eb08" CreationDate="2010-07-02T20:28:26.313" UserDisplayName="Thanatos" Text="On SO, if you click on a question or answer's score, you can see the number of up and down votes forming that score. I love this feature, but superuser.com doesn't appear to have it. Why not?" />
  <row Id="2112" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1140" RevisionGUID="f17b9881-421c-4e3a-a531-ec863188eb08" CreationDate="2010-07-02T20:28:26.313" UserDisplayName="Thanatos" Text="Split score into votes" />
  <row Id="2113" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1140" RevisionGUID="f17b9881-421c-4e3a-a531-ec863188eb08" CreationDate="2010-07-02T20:28:26.313" UserDisplayName="Thanatos" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;split-vote-count&gt;" />
  <row Id="2114" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1140" RevisionGUID="996258a7-db15-4941-8255-eb1203677876" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:50.110" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/55802/split-score-into-votes" Text="" />
  <row Id="2115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1143" RevisionGUID="7b7406a5-049e-4810-b05c-ec8aee9eac61" CreationDate="2010-07-05T14:59:26.717" UserDisplayName="Justin Niessner" Text="After looking at one of my posts on SuperUser, I think the blue bar is there because the background of the code/quote box is too close to that of the rest of the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I could barely tell that there was anything different about the background (other than the blue bar).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe a slightly darker background would fix the problem the blue bar was meant to solve...as well as get rid of the ugly blue bar." />
  <row Id="2116" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1142" RevisionGUID="06838512-9c50-4587-bb37-03a6c07c27e5" CreationDate="2010-07-05T14:20:19.923" UserDisplayName="Lazer" Text="SuperUser, unlike StackOverflow and Meta has a very weird code box. It has a thick blue edge on the left, which is very distracting.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would prefer a clean box like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know why this unnecessary thing was introduced on SuperUser, but with the colour combinations that SuperUser has, it looks odd and not at all nice, specially in `code` (`&quot;&quot;` are still okay).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is there any chance that these dark blue things are removed?** OR is there some very good reason to keep them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/4Mf6N.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/go33W.png" />
  <row Id="2117" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1142" RevisionGUID="06838512-9c50-4587-bb37-03a6c07c27e5" CreationDate="2010-07-05T14:20:19.923" UserDisplayName="Lazer" Text="Why the blue bar on the left edge of the code tag rectangle on superuser.com?" />
  <row Id="2118" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1142" RevisionGUID="06838512-9c50-4587-bb37-03a6c07c27e5" CreationDate="2010-07-05T14:20:19.923" UserDisplayName="Lazer" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;formatting&gt;" />
  <row Id="2119" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1142" RevisionGUID="d4f2f7f2-b59a-4be9-bf97-9caa5657a7b9" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:50.280" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/55926/why-the-blue-bar-on-the-left-edge-of-the-code-tag-rectangle-on-superuser-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="2120" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1145" RevisionGUID="5574ae29-4c98-4868-a91d-8541893fca62" CreationDate="2010-07-06T21:09:48.823" UserDisplayName="Grace Note" Text="[word] can refer to a lot of things, so I have picked out the questions where [word] is either not actually about Microsoft Word or .doc files, or it only mentions it as a tangent rather than having to deal with it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/126421/is-there-a-vim-like-word-processor (Word processing in general)&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/138798/how-to-replace-special-characters-curly-quotes-dashes-ellipses-in-osx (Not Word-exclusive and the author is restricted from using MS Word, so it doesn't even make sense as a tag)&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/85904/software-for-creating-cheat-sheets (Tangentially mentioned, doesn't look applicable as a tag)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Everything else seems to have their merging papers in order. I suggest that someone retag those 3 separately, then call in the artillery to follow up on the remaining." />
  <row Id="2121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1144" RevisionGUID="ca9be38d-fd5c-4ec0-94e5-7a4b59250e8d" CreationDate="2010-07-06T21:00:36.090" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="Can these tags on Superuser be merged into [microsoft-word] ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [**[microsoft-word]**][1]: 358 tags&#xD;&#xA; - [**[word]**][2]: 39 tags&#xD;&#xA; - [**[msword]**][3]: 1 tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/microsoft-word&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/word&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/msword" />
  <row Id="2122" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1144" RevisionGUID="ca9be38d-fd5c-4ec0-94e5-7a4b59250e8d" CreationDate="2010-07-06T21:00:36.090" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="SU tag merge request: [microsoft-word] and [word]" />
  <row Id="2123" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1144" RevisionGUID="ca9be38d-fd5c-4ec0-94e5-7a4b59250e8d" CreationDate="2010-07-06T21:00:36.090" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2124" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1144" RevisionGUID="809c8c84-5774-4364-bf06-7956da01b82f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:50.737" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/56052/su-tag-merge-request-microsoft-word-and-word" Text="" />
  <row Id="2125" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1147" RevisionGUID="1531df65-bbd9-4399-8012-5a7c34ba526a" CreationDate="2010-07-12T19:28:27.473" UserDisplayName="Stefan Lasiewski" Text="I'm the creator of [Unix &amp; Linux][1] (We're almost in the commit phase, and just need one more &quot;off-topic&quot; question).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My proposal doesn't overlap with Superuser. Your Superuser overlaps with my proposal ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I created [Unix &amp; Linux][2] for several main reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. I knew it would be a little controversial and confusing. I wanted to see what the community would do with this proposal. The SE community is omnipotent and can fix any and all conflicts ;)&#xD;&#xA; 2. SO, SF and SU all have overlap themselves. Many basic sysadmin questions could be asked on either SF or SU. If I Google for system administration questions, I'm often led to SO, because SO itself contains many system administration questions which are left over from before SF or SU existed. &#xD;&#xA; 3. [The Trilogy sites are too broad.][3], and are filled with noise. If I want to search for Linux or Unix questions, I don't want to have to wade through similar-but-irrelevant questions related to programming, Windows sysadmin questions, a PHP question which happened to be tagged 'Linux'.&#xD;&#xA; 4. I keep remembering the simple elegance of Usenet, many years ago. It was often easy to ask questions and find answers to my questions. Today we have all of these these big, broad, cluttered web-forums where you could ask many different types of question. In the Usenet days, it all felt better organized. Posters were encouraged to post the question to the appropriate forum, like comp.unix, or comp.os.ms-windows or rec.arts.disney. Maybe I want Usenet with SE's superior moderation system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps this isn't the best strategy. Perhaps Unix &amp; Linux itself is too broad, and it would be better to create smaller facets like &quot;Ubuntu&quot;, and &quot;[Shell-hackers][4]&quot; instead. However, that doesn't seem to be the direction that the community was headed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/3924/unix-linux&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/3924/unix-linux&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/52379/area51-proposals-that-overlap-stackoverflow/55711#55711&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/error?aspxerrorpath=/proposals/9386/shell-hackers" />
  <row Id="2126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1148" RevisionGUID="ce30a335-b7a9-4ab5-9ae2-167ccf6e4b62" CreationDate="2010-07-12T19:43:07.100" UserDisplayName="rlb.usa" Text="**Concerning duplicates on Area51 in general, [see here][1].**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not a StackExchange Exec, but are you familiar with SuperUser? Sure, it gets questions, but it's not doing well - for various reasons. In another Meta discussion (forget where) it was quoted that Jeff and Joel have given up and no longer care about SuperUser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;SuperUser has become a catch-all for most everything &quot;computer&quot;. As long as the proposal is viable (and if nessissary, the proposer defends it), I'm all for it, because it helps organize and undo the catch-all-ness of SuperUser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/54697/near-duplicate-or-subset-proposals-on-area51" />
  <row Id="2127" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1146" RevisionGUID="d828ddd1-b8a6-4349-86b3-b96a2db98a99" CreationDate="2010-07-07T07:57:54.257" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="There are some proposals related to computer software ([Unix &amp; Linux][1], [Ubuntu][2]) with more than 70 followers. Superuser has been already covering these topics. Is it proper to split Superuser into atoms and create lots of sites from it this way? IMHO, this is not the right direction. What do Stackexchange executives think about this?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/3924/unix-linux&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/7716/ubuntu" />
  <row Id="2128" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1146" RevisionGUID="d828ddd1-b8a6-4349-86b3-b96a2db98a99" CreationDate="2010-07-07T07:57:54.257" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="Some proposals on Area 51 are already covered on Superuser" />
  <row Id="2129" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1146" RevisionGUID="d828ddd1-b8a6-4349-86b3-b96a2db98a99" CreationDate="2010-07-07T07:57:54.257" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;area51&gt;&lt;site-proposal&gt;" />
  <row Id="2130" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1146" RevisionGUID="850dbab3-1a32-428d-bf37-44854e4fd3d2" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:51.037" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/56106/some-proposals-on-area-51-are-already-covered-on-superuser" Text="" />
  <row Id="2131" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1150" RevisionGUID="3d0aa0de-6608-4f45-9d2c-ceb81e8030cd" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:25:27.737" UserDisplayName="Ólafur Waage" Text="You asked one question that unfortunately no one was able to answer at the time. If you edit  your question to add more info, then it will get back to the top of the list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My advice, stick to it and try asking other questions if you have any." />
  <row Id="2132" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1151" RevisionGUID="7ebd1b02-bc07-4bb7-88f6-0963d4ba17a9" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:48:35.043" UserDisplayName="JRobert" Text="Persistence: Everyone has something to offer - answer other users questions.  You'll gain rep from up-votes by other readers rewarding you for teaching them something new as well as from acceptances.  Plus you'll be learning more as you think about / search for answers, and from reading other people's answers." />
  <row Id="2133" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1152" RevisionGUID="72bf97de-36b9-444d-8d71-578f724ef7dd" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:49:30.003" UserDisplayName="Dan" Text="Answering questions gets you far more reputation (10 per upvote + 15 for accepted answer, instead of just 5 per question upvote).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should look for unanswered questions (questions with no upvoted answers) with tags you have expertise in.  You can further sort that by newest so that you can answer question right away.  For example if you are a windows-7 expert you could go here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/unanswered/tagged?tagnames=windows-7&amp;tab=newest&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which is unanswered questions with the windows-7 tag and sorted by newest." />
  <row Id="2134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1149" RevisionGUID="3b58eefd-b845-4cae-a52c-7fd700c90bde" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:14:18.120" UserDisplayName="The Sasquatch" Text="I am trying to become an active user in this community, but the question I have asked has become a tumbleweed, and I don't have enough reputation to upvote any answers to other questions.  Looking through the unanswered questions, there don't really appear to be anything that relates to my area of expertise, and I don't see a lot of point in adding additional answers to questions that have already been adaquately answered.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Help?" />
  <row Id="2135" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1149" RevisionGUID="3b58eefd-b845-4cae-a52c-7fd700c90bde" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:14:18.120" UserDisplayName="The Sasquatch" Text="How do I gain reputation in SuperUser if my questions never get answered?" />
  <row Id="2136" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1149" RevisionGUID="3b58eefd-b845-4cae-a52c-7fd700c90bde" CreationDate="2010-07-14T15:14:18.120" UserDisplayName="The Sasquatch" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="2137" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1149" RevisionGUID="c142d487-a720-45e7-bc76-971c0bc6de3f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:52.003" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/57062/how-do-i-gain-reputation-in-superuser-if-my-questions-never-get-answered" Text="" />
  <row Id="2138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1154" RevisionGUID="5eb8a335-ff1b-462c-9394-49acbff80aea" CreationDate="2010-07-18T04:07:26.950" UserDisplayName="random" Text="[Super User][1] (as well as Stack Overflow and Server Fault) is not the place to gauge opinions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a problem fixin' for a solution, yer in the right place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if you want to ask for thoughts on products so you can chew on the feedback and testimonials, it's just the wrong place at the wrong time.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/faq &quot;to which we read&quot;" />
  <row Id="2139" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1153" RevisionGUID="ddd35534-b6c0-4fb5-98ed-4cebae0cf4dc" CreationDate="2010-07-18T03:29:32.553" UserDisplayName="CChriss" Text="This question:&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/164876/opinions-on-areca-backup&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was looking forward to getting people's opinions.  I haven't heard of the program before and wanted to know if others had and what they thought of it." />
  <row Id="2140" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1153" RevisionGUID="ddd35534-b6c0-4fb5-98ed-4cebae0cf4dc" CreationDate="2010-07-18T03:29:32.553" UserDisplayName="CChriss" Text="Questioning whether question deserved to be closed" />
  <row Id="2141" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1153" RevisionGUID="ddd35534-b6c0-4fb5-98ed-4cebae0cf4dc" CreationDate="2010-07-18T03:29:32.553" UserDisplayName="CChriss" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;" />
  <row Id="2142" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1153" RevisionGUID="5a08bb66-df6b-4df7-8ae2-e2d20b5faa12" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:52.670" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/57561/questioning-whether-question-deserved-to-be-closed" Text="" />
  <row Id="2143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1155" RevisionGUID="652d3e9d-9983-4f4a-b57e-6e22f74bd912" CreationDate="2010-07-20T14:26:44.263" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Where in the world is my SuperUser t-shirt?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/49539/where-in-the-world-is-my-superuser-t-shirt)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;My hope for getting my Superuser t-shirt began with the form I filled on **April 8th**, 2010. Then on **May 11th**, I asked [this][1] question. Jeff told me in his [answer][2] that the t-shirts are on their way as of **June 4th**. Now it's **July 20th**, and I almost lost my hope after a long waiting period, namely 3½ months...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Will I ever receive my Superuser t-shirt in the near future? Thanks for your response in advance.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/49539/where-in-the-world-is-my-superuser-t-shirt&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/49539/where-in-the-world-is-my-superuser-t-shirt/49540#49540" />
  <row Id="2144" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1155" RevisionGUID="652d3e9d-9983-4f4a-b57e-6e22f74bd912" CreationDate="2010-07-20T14:26:44.263" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="I'm losing my hope for my Superuser t-shirt" />
  <row Id="2145" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1155" RevisionGUID="652d3e9d-9983-4f4a-b57e-6e22f74bd912" CreationDate="2010-07-20T14:26:44.263" UserDisplayName="Mehper C. Palavuzlar" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;superuser&gt;&lt;t-shirt&gt;" />
  <row Id="2146" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1155" RevisionGUID="00fd135f-fe71-4558-bd37-1458e95b4450" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:53.073" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/57763/im-losing-my-hope-for-my-superuser-t-shirt" Text="" />
  <row Id="2147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1157" RevisionGUID="ddb8d747-31b0-48d1-a2fb-ac789a57f317" CreationDate="2010-07-22T16:30:03.063" UserDisplayName="Grace Note" Text="Maybe when the Web Apps site goes live and is no longer a Beta, it can be added to the FAQ. But I think that until that point, we should avoid updating the official documentation on the publicly live sites to reflect &quot;potentialities&quot;. It's not to say that it won't make it through, but then in the situation that it *doesn't* make it through, the team would have to revert that change. So a one-time job sounds a lot more appropriate." />
  <row Id="2148" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1156" RevisionGUID="6aac0be6-a9c5-4be9-8425-7e763b5be86a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T16:27:32.113" UserDisplayName="Rising Star" Text="May I suggest that we link to webapps.stackexchange.com on the SuperUser FAQ?  I asked a question there which was closed with the suggestion to ask there instead." />
  <row Id="2149" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1156" RevisionGUID="6aac0be6-a9c5-4be9-8425-7e763b5be86a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T16:27:32.113" UserDisplayName="Rising Star" Text="Suggestion: Link to webapps.stackexchange.com to SuperUser FAQ" />
  <row Id="2150" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1156" RevisionGUID="6aac0be6-a9c5-4be9-8425-7e763b5be86a" CreationDate="2010-07-22T16:27:32.113" UserDisplayName="Rising Star" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;stackexchange&gt;" />
  <row Id="2151" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1156" RevisionGUID="b8f3df41-3d98-400d-b459-b9b5247fc85b" CreationDate="2010-07-22T18:03:53.680" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/58080/suggestion-link-to-webapps-stackexchange-com-to-superuser-faq" Text="" />
  <row Id="2152" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1158" RevisionGUID="fcd8f8a2-4b2f-4a1b-9526-97f6e07be71f" CreationDate="2010-07-22T19:48:47.297" UserId="2394" Text="If it answers the question, then links are fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BUT it's always better if some of the details could be put in the answer, in case the link dies later." />
  <row Id="2153" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1159" RevisionGUID="4a30e770-1871-4a89-80b9-b91db5060f65" CreationDate="2010-07-22T20:53:46.360" UserId="7375" Text="I'm opposed to just having links. We should strive to at least add a few words to our answer. It makes things both more readable and providing an excerpt can allow others to easily judge how good the answer is." />
  <row Id="2154" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1160" RevisionGUID="74e2f35b-c665-435e-a7a5-098d49af9cae" CreationDate="2010-07-22T21:30:17.413" UserId="4386" Text="Don't look a gift horse in the mouth!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wouldn't mind my one either, but free is free and I am sure when they are printed / ready, we will receive them!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(I got an email a short while ago saying about problems and that they will be despatched soon)." />
  <row Id="2155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1161" RevisionGUID="a5359bb2-a8ad-4009-b86e-1357b83f8e74" CreationDate="2010-07-22T21:40:19.587" UserId="1501" Text="The site is live: [webapps.stackexchange.com][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webapps.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="2156" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1162" RevisionGUID="2258db46-366e-4419-9447-1bb448fc8dac" CreationDate="2010-07-23T01:41:20.257" UserId="4377" Text="![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I mean look at it! n votes say how many answer(s) posted ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/YcZp0.jpg" />
  <row Id="2157" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1162" RevisionGUID="2258db46-366e-4419-9447-1bb448fc8dac" CreationDate="2010-07-23T01:41:20.257" UserId="4377" Text="Can't see number of answers posted with current meta.superuser colour scheme" />
  <row Id="2158" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1162" RevisionGUID="2258db46-366e-4419-9447-1bb448fc8dac" CreationDate="2010-07-23T01:41:20.257" UserId="4377" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;colour-scheme&gt;" />
  <row Id="2159" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1163" RevisionGUID="744947dd-2297-4163-88e8-d2bcc5b80d67" CreationDate="2010-07-23T02:58:11.117" UserId="36565" Text="I say write a few words description about the link (especially for links like `http://www.my-blog.com/?article-id=123456`), or at least copy and paste the first paragraph-ish of the blog post linked." />
  <row Id="2160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1164" RevisionGUID="2bf8c83e-2074-4a49-b5dd-3f9f35049904" CreationDate="2010-07-23T06:52:22.367" UserId="2954" Text="Can we please move that link to top right? Like this &quot;log out | about | meta | faq&quot; ? Please?" />
  <row Id="2161" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1164" RevisionGUID="2bf8c83e-2074-4a49-b5dd-3f9f35049904" CreationDate="2010-07-23T06:52:22.367" UserId="2954" Text="Location of the &quot;( visit meta )&quot; link" />
  <row Id="2162" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1164" RevisionGUID="2bf8c83e-2074-4a49-b5dd-3f9f35049904" CreationDate="2010-07-23T06:52:22.367" UserId="2954" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2163" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1165" RevisionGUID="4d3ed5d1-b1c1-425b-9143-dcf977252981" CreationDate="2010-07-23T08:09:05.753" UserId="6998" Text="Links are bad. I **very strongly agree** that answers with just links in them, no matter how good the link is, are **completely useless**. Why? Yes, they answer the question, but SU isn't just about answering the questions of &quot;now&quot;. If it were, we wouldn't close as duplicate. It's about building up a knowledge base that simply doesn't exist right now, using outside links as flavour is fine, but if that's the entire answer, when that link dies suddenly it's useless, and we're back to pre-SOFU fact finding, trawling through message boards and mailing lists trying to piece together our answer, and finding little but &quot;God, this is so easy, just lycos it!&quot;. Having a link as source is fine. Having a link as &quot;(For more information, see:&quot; is fine. But unless the text in your answer does in fact answer the question, you're actually harming the site more than you're helping." />
  <row Id="2164" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1164" RevisionGUID="38637837-272a-43e0-bf56-5e779757a6f2" CreationDate="2010-07-23T09:04:13.780" UserId="1548" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2165" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1166" RevisionGUID="7b37d309-d57e-438d-a1ee-78d84801d07a" CreationDate="2010-07-23T09:07:08.267" UserId="1" Text="Unlikely, as we have a standard position for that link across the entire network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And meta *is* really important." />
  <row Id="2166" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1167" RevisionGUID="b1d88a65-850e-47b4-ab10-2fd01c77ca54" CreationDate="2010-07-23T10:41:21.300" UserId="660" Text="This should also apply to other cases where some application (in the widest sense) questions would be better.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Based on the current betas, this should include:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Gaming&#xD;&#xA;- Electronic Gadgets&#xD;&#xA;- Statistical Analysis (includes &quot;data visualisation&quot; in its description).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(And should be reviewed as more SE sites come fully on line.)" />
  <row Id="2167" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1162" RevisionGUID="fa62a67d-2a71-4c42-99cb-9bf6e4fb750a" CreationDate="2010-07-23T15:07:33.143" UserId="307" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;colour-scheme&gt;" />
  <row Id="2168" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1168" RevisionGUID="1add4b2f-f686-4a1a-98e6-2a1bfcab35ab" CreationDate="2010-07-23T16:30:21.690" UserId="36565" Text="In the Tags field for questions on SU meta, typing in &quot;discussion&quot; comes up with two suggested `discussion` tags, both with the same number of questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Edit: When submitting the question, both 'ghost' `discussion` tags get used." />
  <row Id="2169" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1168" RevisionGUID="1add4b2f-f686-4a1a-98e6-2a1bfcab35ab" CreationDate="2010-07-23T16:30:21.690" UserId="36565" Text="Two discussion tags?" />
  <row Id="2170" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1168" RevisionGUID="1add4b2f-f686-4a1a-98e6-2a1bfcab35ab" CreationDate="2010-07-23T16:30:21.690" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="2171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1169" RevisionGUID="5d5d8f6b-fc39-43cf-b025-9f0459b8fd2b" CreationDate="2010-07-23T16:33:18.967" UserId="36565" Text="Right now, there seems to be one canonical `hard-drive` tag, with 901 questions. There are also questions tagged `disk` and *shudder* `hard disk`. Yes, that's the tag `hard` and the tag `disk`. Should they all be retagged into `hard-drive`?" />
  <row Id="2172" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1169" RevisionGUID="5d5d8f6b-fc39-43cf-b025-9f0459b8fd2b" CreationDate="2010-07-23T16:33:18.967" UserId="36565" Text="Disk, disc, and hard" />
  <row Id="2173" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1169" RevisionGUID="5d5d8f6b-fc39-43cf-b025-9f0459b8fd2b" CreationDate="2010-07-23T16:33:18.967" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1170" RevisionGUID="c0313796-f139-411f-90ad-1351bd356312" CreationDate="2010-07-23T18:20:21.407" UserId="7597" Text="Yes, consistency is a good thing, and `hard-drive` looks to be the standard form in this case. I've retagged questions under `harddisk`, `hard-disk`, `hard`, and `hard-drive` as `hard-drive`. There are a good number under `disk` though, I wonder if a moderator can use their mass-retag powers on those questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`disc` seems to be used in the context of CD and DVD, not so much hard drives." />
  <row Id="2175" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1168" RevisionGUID="af1d2580-2651-4899-9411-9f601e16b46f" CreationDate="2010-07-23T22:55:10.790" UserId="2" Comment="edited tags; edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;" />
  <row Id="2176" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1169" RevisionGUID="04e85cf5-55c0-4858-b804-184133d47374" CreationDate="2010-07-23T22:55:32.320" UserId="2" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2177" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1164" RevisionGUID="8bb8659b-630e-4eaf-9f39-71898fe07080" CreationDate="2010-07-23T23:03:58.070" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1172" RevisionGUID="dfbf7029-1d48-47dc-91ae-02284e802690" CreationDate="2010-07-24T02:01:58.223" UserId="26960" Text="Hi all,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a question on SU that has 1k views. Now, I would like to know if there is a way for all question over 1k to see the exact of views that question got. I think that adding a little button or if we click on &quot;1k&quot; just like when we checked up/down votes on a question, that we can see the total of views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this question is at the good place and is accurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;David." />
  <row Id="2183" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1172" RevisionGUID="dfbf7029-1d48-47dc-91ae-02284e802690" CreationDate="2010-07-24T02:01:58.223" UserId="26960" Text="How to see the exact &quot;views&quot; on a question" />
  <row Id="2184" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1172" RevisionGUID="dfbf7029-1d48-47dc-91ae-02284e802690" CreationDate="2010-07-24T02:01:58.223" UserId="26960" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="2185" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1172" RevisionGUID="58794ac0-22b1-49ee-961c-f35059e0ceb1" CreationDate="2010-07-24T02:09:30.937" UserId="26960" Comment="added 78 characters in body" Text="Hi all,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have a question on SU that has 1k views. Now, I would like to know if there is a way for all question over 1k to see the exact of views that question got. I think that adding a little button or if we click on &quot;1k&quot; just like when we checked up/down votes on a question, that we can see the total of views.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We could have like a standard of operating for all &quot;hidden information&quot;...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope this question is at the good place and is accurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;David." />
  <row Id="2186" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1173" RevisionGUID="52db65b3-ee18-46fc-899e-2f3ba32dfcd5" CreationDate="2010-07-24T02:19:17.670" UserId="310" Text="Just hover your mouse over the &quot;1K&quot; and a tooltip will show the actual count." />
  <row Id="2187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1174" RevisionGUID="76a626a0-d327-4580-b86a-560ba7599258" CreationDate="2010-07-24T16:52:51.960" UserId="1" Text="As a matter of policy, you should always have at least a *sentence* (and ideally a quoted paragraph) explaining how this link helps or hoisting the most helpful bit of it out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Think of it like this: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;img src=&quot;http://roma.theoffside.com/files/2007/09/cliffnotes.jpg&quot;&gt;" />
  <row Id="2188" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1175" RevisionGUID="9c6ccea2-784b-4b3b-8035-861ad43eabe0" CreationDate="2010-07-24T16:54:04.280" UserId="1" Text="You can also click through to the post, the exact view count is shown in the sidebar:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; asked  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **today**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; viewed  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **8 times**&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; latest activity  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; **today**&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2189" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1176" RevisionGUID="ffd3b8d0-17cb-4173-9379-eaec8b6c7ccd" CreationDate="2010-07-24T20:19:21.247" UserId="6734" Text="Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I need a tricky idea to increase my question's visitor on superuser. sometime I ask a question in SU that the answers was really important to me but after a weak or more just have 10 to 30 visitor and have no answer how can I increase visitor of such question?" />
  <row Id="2190" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1176" RevisionGUID="ffd3b8d0-17cb-4173-9379-eaec8b6c7ccd" CreationDate="2010-07-24T20:19:21.247" UserId="6734" Text="Increase visitor of Question (No Bounty)" />
  <row Id="2191" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1176" RevisionGUID="ffd3b8d0-17cb-4173-9379-eaec8b6c7ccd" CreationDate="2010-07-24T20:19:21.247" UserId="6734" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;answers&gt;&lt;visitor&gt;&lt;suggestion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2192" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1162" RevisionGUID="80929294-b756-4c56-8e25-231f2a5ef6f0" CreationDate="2010-07-24T21:22:47.587" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4377,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Sathya&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:307,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;random&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2193" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1177" RevisionGUID="6913d207-736e-4f04-bd31-77220ae2dec4" CreationDate="2010-07-24T21:43:40.260" UserId="3119" Text="You can edit the question, which will bump it back to the recent activity list (the default list that comes up when you navigate to superuser.com).  This should put it back out there for anyone watching.  Note that your question will be bumped in this way whenever anyone answers or edits their answers as well.  " />
  <row Id="2194" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1178" RevisionGUID="39889193-48b1-4462-8441-c6b462146e7d" CreationDate="2010-07-25T01:37:39.447" UserId="1" Text="In addition to bounty, see this section of [the /faq](http://superuser.com/faq) --&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; ##What if I don't get a good answer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; In order to get good answers, you have to put some effort into your question. Edit your question to provide status and progress updates. Document your own continued efforts to answer your question. This will naturally bump your question and get more people interested in it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2195" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1155" RevisionGUID="b187948b-2517-4f52-88f6-e906331a7560" CreationDate="2010-07-25T01:38:46.607" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;t-shirt&gt;" />
  <row Id="2196" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1176" RevisionGUID="733aae8a-67b2-4f19-93bf-75a7b89311fb" CreationDate="2010-07-25T03:05:51.380" UserId="494" Comment="added 27 characters in body; edited title; edited title" Text="I need a tricky idea to increase the number of visitors to my questions on Super User. Sometimes I ask a question on SU where the answer is really important to me but after a week or more just has 10 to 30 visitors and has no answer; how can I increase the number of visitors to such questions?" />
  <row Id="2197" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1176" RevisionGUID="733aae8a-67b2-4f19-93bf-75a7b89311fb" CreationDate="2010-07-25T03:05:51.380" UserId="494" Comment="added 27 characters in body; edited title; edited title" Text="Increase number of visitors to a question (without bounty)" />
  <row Id="2199" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1180" RevisionGUID="4f5202a3-84bd-411f-b7dc-2cb43fe6ddef" CreationDate="2010-07-25T00:24:42.700" UserDisplayName="mrdenny" Text="Check out [Area 51][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="2200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1179" RevisionGUID="c487c145-e8e2-4cf8-923c-3755b70111cf" CreationDate="2010-07-24T23:55:35.310" Text="The design of SO/SU/SF is very clean and easy to use, I want to have a similar one to host the Q/A service in my local company, is it open source? or does stack overflow service inc. have the Q/A hosting service?" />
  <row Id="2201" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1179" RevisionGUID="c487c145-e8e2-4cf8-923c-3755b70111cf" CreationDate="2010-07-24T23:55:35.310" Text="Can have my own SO/SU/SF style Q/A site?" />
  <row Id="2202" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1179" RevisionGUID="c487c145-e8e2-4cf8-923c-3755b70111cf" CreationDate="2010-07-24T23:55:35.310" Text="&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;stackoverflow&gt;" />
  <row Id="2203" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1179" RevisionGUID="1d40198d-c65f-4ee1-bf67-bda29c110b5f" CreationDate="2010-07-25T06:29:39.050" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/167321/can-have-my-own-so-su-sf-style-q-a-site" Text="" />
  <row Id="2204" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1181" RevisionGUID="e5b7c500-a70d-4c7b-9d33-fa2c23ede16b" CreationDate="2010-07-25T09:24:31.647" UserId="522" Text="I'm sorry to say that no, you can't self host. And it is not open source.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But there are open source clones exist. One of the example is [cnprog][1]. You can access the source [here][2] and [here][3]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;After you have the source, you can do anything you want.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://cnprog.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://code.google.com/p/cnprog/&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://github.com/cnprog/CNPROG" />
  <row Id="2205" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1179" RevisionGUID="6cfe59c6-7368-4116-8789-d5bdd78f8783" CreationDate="2010-07-25T15:17:38.873" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;hosting&gt;&lt;stackoverflow&gt;" />
  <row Id="2206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1182" RevisionGUID="b12c982d-8b05-4888-a766-5f669f7a6523" CreationDate="2010-07-26T04:35:04.960" UserId="2182" Text="I haven't seen any other tag wiki&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; pages on SuperUser yet, so I didn't have anything to compare to as I wrote up the new [[windows-7] tag wiki page][12]. What do you think? If you can edit it, go right ahead, otherwise, please let me know what I can change!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; If you aren't aware of the tag wiki pages, [see this Meta thread][13].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Windows 7 Logo](http://a.imageshack.us/img338/7875/windows7pcsticker.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Released in October 2009, Windows 7 is Microsoft's latest operating system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###[What is Windows 7?][1]&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Your PC, simplified&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;You told us to make Windows simpler and easier to use. We listened. Windows 7 has better ways to find and manage files—like [Jump Lists][2] and improved [taskbar][3] previews—to help you speed through everyday tasks. It's designed for faster and more reliable performance, so your PC just works the way you want it to. With [64-bit][4] support, you can take full advantage of the latest powerful PCs. And great features like [HomeGroup][5], [Windows Media Center][6], and [Windows Touch][7] make new things possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Helpful Links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Microsoft's Hardware and Software Compatibility Center][8]&#xD;&#xA;- [Which version is right for me?][9]&#xD;&#xA;- [Windows 7 FAQ][10]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###[Minimum hardware requirements][11]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	Architecture	32-bit					64-bit&#xD;&#xA;	Processor		1 GHz 32-bit processor	1 GHz 64-bit processor&#xD;&#xA;	Memory (RAM)	1 GB					2 GB&#xD;&#xA;	HDD free space	16 GB free space		20 GB free space&#xD;&#xA;	Graphics card	DirectX 9 graphics processor with WDDM driver model 1.0&#xD;&#xA;	Optical drive	DVD drive (only to install from DVD media)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/what-is&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/jump-lists&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/windows-taskbar&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/64-bit-support&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/homegroup&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/windows-media-center&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/touch&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/compatibility/windows-7/en-us/default.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/compare&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/faq.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/system-requirements&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged?tagnames=windows-7&amp;sort=info&amp;pagesize=15&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/57992/so-whats-this-tag-wiki-thing" />
  <row Id="2207" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1182" RevisionGUID="b12c982d-8b05-4888-a766-5f669f7a6523" CreationDate="2010-07-26T04:35:04.960" UserId="2182" Text="Critique my [windows-7] tag wiki!" />
  <row Id="2208" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1182" RevisionGUID="b12c982d-8b05-4888-a766-5f669f7a6523" CreationDate="2010-07-26T04:35:04.960" UserId="2182" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tagging&gt;&lt;tag-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="2209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1183" RevisionGUID="9087dfe7-1e4e-4d3c-9bac-7c1272fd27ec" CreationDate="2010-07-26T12:17:10.760" UserId="36601" Text="I've seen several question related to fonts on SU. While I do believe that fonts can be considered software related, I've noticed that a subset of those questions asks superusers to **manually** identify font from provided set of letters.  &#xD;&#xA; In my opinion such questions do not belong on SuperUser. If the question was about some software which would identify fonts, then that would be OK, but I believe that questions such as ones I am complaining about here are as related to SuprUser as question where the OP would post a link to a mp3 file containing part of a song and ask us what's the name of the song.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I ask you what is your opinion on this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/56865/  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/118252/ closed as duplicate of above question  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/167760/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2210" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1183" RevisionGUID="9087dfe7-1e4e-4d3c-9bac-7c1272fd27ec" CreationDate="2010-07-26T12:17:10.760" UserId="36601" Text="Questions asking for manual identification of fonts?" />
  <row Id="2211" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1183" RevisionGUID="9087dfe7-1e4e-4d3c-9bac-7c1272fd27ec" CreationDate="2010-07-26T12:17:10.760" UserId="36601" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1184" RevisionGUID="a2a0e175-db88-4f75-9a5f-4deed18481e2" CreationDate="2010-07-26T12:55:04.827" UserId="3110" Text="I agree that fonts are originally a typography topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a question is about &quot;how to install a font&quot;, or &quot;why this font is not printing, from my computer&quot;, then this is a computer related question, and it can be asked on Super User.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, eye identification of a font has nothing to do with computers. Such questions should be closed indeed as off-topic, in my opinion." />
  <row Id="2213" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1185" RevisionGUID="5f1a8920-5571-4feb-8414-e4afe9949c4f" CreationDate="2010-07-26T16:01:13.510" UserId="123" Text="That &quot;What is Windows 7&quot; section reads like an advertisement - I think the tone should be more like wikipedia rather than microsoft.com." />
  <row Id="2214" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1182" RevisionGUID="ec3b5a2e-6820-44f7-8888-dc0706797778" CreationDate="2010-07-26T18:48:13.940" UserId="2182" Comment="Added SU question links" Text="I haven't seen any other tag wiki&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; pages on SuperUser yet, so I didn't have anything to compare to as I wrote up the new [[windows-7] tag wiki page](http://superuser.com/questions/tagged?tagnames=windows-7&amp;sort=info&amp;pagesize=15). What do you think? If you can edit it, go right ahead, otherwise, please let me know what I can change!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; If you aren't aware of the tag wiki pages, [see this Meta thread](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/57992/so-whats-this-tag-wiki-thing).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Windows 7 Logo](http://a.imageshack.us/img338/7875/windows7pcsticker.png)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Released in October 2009, Windows 7 is Microsoft's latest operating system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###What is Windows 7?&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Your PC, simplified&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;You told us to make Windows simpler and easier to use. We listened. Windows 7 has better ways to find and manage files—like [Jump Lists][2] and improved [taskbar][3] previews—to help you speed through everyday tasks. It's designed for faster and more reliable performance, so your PC just works the way you want it to. With [64-bit][4] support, you can take full advantage of the latest powerful PCs. And great features like [HomeGroup][5], [Windows Media Center][6], and [Windows Touch][7] make new things possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&lt;sub&gt;- From microsoft.com: *[What is Windows 7][1]*&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Related Super User questions:&#xD;&#xA; - [What are some &quot;must-have&quot; Windows programs?][8]&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - [Free antivirus solutions for Windows][9]&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - [Windows 7 Tips and Tricks][10]&#xD;&#xA; - [What can be done in Windows 7 that can't be done in Windows XP?][11]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; Applies to all versions of Windows, not just Windows 7&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Helpful Links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- [Microsoft's Hardware and Software Compatibility Center][12]&#xD;&#xA;- [Which version is right for me?][13]&#xD;&#xA;- [Windows 7 FAQ][14]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###[Minimum hardware requirements][15]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;	Architecture	32-bit					64-bit&#xD;&#xA;	Processor		1 GHz 32-bit processor	1 GHz 64-bit processor&#xD;&#xA;	Memory (RAM)	1 GB					2 GB&#xD;&#xA;	HDD free space	16 GB free space		20 GB free space&#xD;&#xA;	Graphics card	DirectX 9 graphics processor with WDDM driver model 1.0&#xD;&#xA;	Optical drive	DVD drive (only to install from DVD media)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/what-is&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/jump-lists&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/windows-taskbar&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/64-bit-support&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/homegroup&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/windows-media-center&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/touch&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://superuser.com/questions/1241/what-are-some-must-have-windows-programs&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://superuser.com/questions/2/free-antivirus-solutions-for-windows&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://superuser.com/questions/7622/windows-7-tips-and-tricks&#xD;&#xA;  [11]: http://superuser.com/questions/14147/what-can-be-done-in-windows-7-that-cant-be-done-in-windows-xp&#xD;&#xA;  [12]: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/compatibility/windows-7/en-us/default.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [13]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/compare&#xD;&#xA;  [14]: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/faq.aspx&#xD;&#xA;  [15]: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/system-requirements" />
  <row Id="2215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1186" RevisionGUID="9889d902-d852-4bc1-a418-93273e3cc2c5" CreationDate="2010-07-26T23:34:13.207" UserId="605" Text="Below are a few thoughts that I've had relating to a few points in the FAQ that need to be cleaned up by the site administration to prevent confusion when people move between Stack Exchange sites (especially between StackOverflow, ServerFault, and SuperUser).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The use of &quot;power user&quot; is confusing and should be clarified. I don't feel that &quot;power user&quot; encompasses enough people. There are plenty of people who use a computer on a regular basis and simply want to become more efficient. To me, these aren't &quot;power users&quot;; a true power user would be someone who you see using the command-line all the time, has automation routines for recurring tasks, and is comfortable to open the registry of a Windows OS and start hacking away. I think that the phrase &quot;enthusiast&quot; is sufficient for the scope and would bring SuperUser more in line with StackOverflow, which is designed for the professional programmer as well as the hobbyist.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The descriptions of what StackOverflow and ServerFault are need work. &quot;Server&quot; has multiple meanings, depending on if you are talking to a system administrator/network administrator or a computer scientist/software engineer. Programming also has different meanings - writing automation scripts might be appropriate on SuperUser or ServerFault and not StackOverflow, depending on the exact context of the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As new Stack Exchange sites open, I feel that it is important to potentially develop partnerships with them to offset some loads. A particular Stack Exchange that covers a subset of system administration/network administration/IT topics should be linked to in the official FAQ to ensure that people can get to the best possible venue to answer their questions. The topicality of each SE that is linked to should be described clearly (without ambiguity), but concisely.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[StackOverflow Meta Post][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[ServerFault Meta Post][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/58530/site-faq-update-suggestions&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.serverfault.com/questions/507/site-faq-update-suggestions" />
  <row Id="2216" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1186" RevisionGUID="9889d902-d852-4bc1-a418-93273e3cc2c5" CreationDate="2010-07-26T23:34:13.207" UserId="605" Text="Site FAQ Update Suggestions" />
  <row Id="2217" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1186" RevisionGUID="9889d902-d852-4bc1-a418-93273e3cc2c5" CreationDate="2010-07-26T23:34:13.207" UserId="605" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;faq-update-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2218" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1186" RevisionGUID="88059b02-da79-4deb-8271-fa825f0846d4" CreationDate="2010-07-27T00:56:45.220" UserId="605" />
  <row Id="2219" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1185" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-27T07:47:48.000" UserId="1548" />
  <row Id="2220" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1182" RevisionGUID="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" CreationDate="2010-07-27T07:47:48.000" UserId="1548" />
  <row Id="2221" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="687" RevisionGUID="ee4ff7e5-ea1e-454c-84ae-58c88edb88a5" CreationDate="2010-07-27T08:45:51.527" UserId="517" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="[gmail-not-spam-vs-move-to-inbox][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not sure it can be fixed if that's what the OP thought was the best answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now Gnoupi did give a good answer and has 21 upvotes versus zero votes the accepted answer has, so in a sense the system works.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The OP has a relatively low reputation, so maybe at the time he didn't understand how the system worked. Is there a way to give the OP feedback on the accepted answer?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should I down-vote the question because the accepted answer is not a good one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/29339/gmail-not-spam-vs-move-to-inbox/45405#45405&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1187" RevisionGUID="e2212450-7ffb-4137-b5b5-5cc64b080b1f" CreationDate="2010-07-27T08:53:23.960" UserId="3110" Text="- Super User's public is, by FAQ: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is for computer enthusiasts&#xD;&#xA;&gt; and power users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &quot;and&quot; includes both. Regular computer users, and power users. Doesn't mean you can't ask simple questions when you have such description, in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Super User's scope is: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If you have a question about … &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; and it is not about … &#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; - videogames or consoles&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - electronic devices, media players, cell phones or smart phones, except&#xD;&#xA;&gt; insofar as they interface with your&#xD;&#xA;&gt; computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt; - a shopping or buying recommendation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's probably the most specific of all sites, so far (not that this is an especially good thing). What do you suggest to improve it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About gray areas, usually, this is a &quot;case by case&quot; evaluation. Some scripting questions can be answered on SU, some on SO, some on SF. It depends on what the user wants to do with them, but in general, I don't see an issue with them. Such grey area doesn't mean we have to have a clear limit, they can exist on all sites." />
  <row Id="2223" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1187" RevisionGUID="e2212450-7ffb-4137-b5b5-5cc64b080b1f" CreationDate="2010-07-27T08:53:23.960" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2224" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="687" RevisionGUID="73ea89ab-83e7-4919-b63a-2a0c1c64d97e" CreationDate="2010-07-27T08:54:18.763" UserId="3110" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3110,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Gnoupi&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2225" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1188" RevisionGUID="60589fce-3c46-468a-9698-aa8e3acc09fc" CreationDate="2010-07-27T12:36:17.610" UserId="16871" Text="Can [this][1] be now moved to webapps.stackexchange.com?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/141017/how-can-i-delete-my-account-profile-from-http-forums-asp-net-closed" />
  <row Id="2226" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1188" RevisionGUID="60589fce-3c46-468a-9698-aa8e3acc09fc" CreationDate="2010-07-27T12:36:17.610" UserId="16871" Text="Can this question be now moved to webapps.stackexchange.com?" />
  <row Id="2227" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1188" RevisionGUID="60589fce-3c46-468a-9698-aa8e3acc09fc" CreationDate="2010-07-27T12:36:17.610" UserId="16871" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;moving-questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="2228" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1189" RevisionGUID="a1798aff-7473-4fa8-91aa-7872a45d011b" CreationDate="2010-07-27T13:42:37.633" UserId="3110" Text="There are no links currently between the existing sites, and the new ones, while they are in beta. As such, it's not possible yet to migrate your question, you will have to copy it yourself, for now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is planned, however, as you can see at this [feature request](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/52141/will-it-be-possible-to-migrate-questions-between-the-trilogy-and-the-stack-exchan) on the main Meta site." />
  <row Id="2229" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1190" RevisionGUID="ac197e42-e98d-46c4-be20-347194ff995b" CreationDate="2010-07-27T17:20:36.450" UserId="36565" Text="Should virtualization questions be tagged as both virtualbox and vmware?" />
  <row Id="2230" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1190" RevisionGUID="ac197e42-e98d-46c4-be20-347194ff995b" CreationDate="2010-07-27T17:20:36.450" UserId="36565" Text="Should virtualization questions be tagged as both virtualbox and vmware?" />
  <row Id="2231" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1190" RevisionGUID="ac197e42-e98d-46c4-be20-347194ff995b" CreationDate="2010-07-27T17:20:36.450" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="2232" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1191" RevisionGUID="0ecc7e7e-3ff8-4832-82a9-7de6ebf08466" CreationDate="2010-07-27T17:50:49.043" UserId="26960" Text="I think it should not since VMWare is a specific software but Virtualization can be more general like Virtualbox and other virtualization software." />
  <row Id="2233" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1192" RevisionGUID="8ef6abde-04f1-4e0e-b765-1302e634e8bc" CreationDate="2010-07-27T19:40:49.673" UserId="7597" Text="VMWare and VirtualBox are separate products. If specifically asking about one or the other, use the appropriate tag. No need to use both unless they are both relevant to the question. In either case, you would still use the `virtualization` tag as well." />
  <row Id="2234" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1190" RevisionGUID="c1f53dbe-9e32-42d1-b6b8-5759184fba57" CreationDate="2010-07-27T21:10:18.597" UserId="36565" Comment="added 6 characters in body" Text="Should `virtualization` questions be tagged as both `virtualbox` and `vmware`?" />
  <row Id="2235" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1193" RevisionGUID="da80a811-ac9a-4074-8ecf-856c7a748364" CreationDate="2010-07-28T09:26:10.027" UserId="20065" Text="Did they changed the answers sort order recently ? It seems that the &quot;best&quot; answer is not on the top anymore... (Or maybe is a bug ;-)" />
  <row Id="2236" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1193" RevisionGUID="da80a811-ac9a-4074-8ecf-856c7a748364" CreationDate="2010-07-28T09:26:10.027" UserId="20065" Text="Is there a change made in the sort order ?" />
  <row Id="2237" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1193" RevisionGUID="da80a811-ac9a-4074-8ecf-856c7a748364" CreationDate="2010-07-28T09:26:10.027" UserId="20065" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;feature&gt;&lt;interface&gt;" />
  <row Id="2238" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1194" RevisionGUID="2254c730-9fda-4d9c-9a55-7bee9860bb2b" CreationDate="2010-07-28T12:46:08.213" UserId="434" Text="You have the option to sort the answers however you like. It's in a series of tabs, right underneath the question." />
  <row Id="2239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1195" RevisionGUID="d5740758-90e4-4eff-b2f0-16fb27ad1cf0" CreationDate="2010-07-28T13:00:26.030" UserId="307" Text="If the accepted answer is also by the same user who asked the question, it will not be stuck at the top of the list of answers, regardless of sort option.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It will instead appear wherever it would in the ranking by votes or time given the tab you've selected." />
  <row Id="2240" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1164" RevisionGUID="fb64d2df-d2be-4d5d-bcda-85835e704a1d" CreationDate="2010-07-28T16:59:21.033" UserId="2954" Comment="fabulous screenshot" Text="Can we please move that link to top right? Like this &quot;log out | about | meta | faq&quot; ? Please?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** Here is a screenshot&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i31.tinypic.com/4gjbky.png" />
  <row Id="2241" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1164" RevisionGUID="03493e40-0aa9-4814-b690-7a2debf8240b" CreationDate="2010-07-28T17:04:42.877" UserId="2954" Comment="new screenshot" Text="Can we please move that link to top right? Like this &quot;log out | about | meta | faq&quot; ? Please?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Update:** Here is a screenshot&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i30.tinypic.com/2cd972q.png" />
  <row Id="2242" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1176" RevisionGUID="008befc2-b5ef-49ca-adda-9969594c630d" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:24:27.240" UserId="6734" Comment="added 199 characters in body" Text="I need a tricky idea to increase the number of visitors to my questions on Super User. Sometimes I ask a question on SU where the answer is really important to me but after a week or more just has 10 to 30 visitors and has no answer; how can I increase the number of visitors to such questions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.S: I think of a way that your question always suggest by google to other people who search about. but it need a tricky way to force google crawler and spider to show your question as a top 3.  " />
  <row Id="2243" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1196" RevisionGUID="5a36ed18-5c0d-43b7-898e-e83505668eb9" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:29:25.357" UserId="6734" Text="when we answer a question if some one comment on my answer ( on the next login SU show us the comment) but what if we comment on a question or other one answer how can we alert by SU that some one answer or say something about our comment." />
  <row Id="2244" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1196" RevisionGUID="5a36ed18-5c0d-43b7-898e-e83505668eb9" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:29:25.357" UserId="6734" Text="how can we understand some one answer my comment " />
  <row Id="2245" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1196" RevisionGUID="5a36ed18-5c0d-43b7-898e-e83505668eb9" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:29:25.357" UserId="6734" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;comment&gt;" />
  <row Id="2246" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1197" RevisionGUID="5a2a9740-8ce1-4f51-a7cf-a4a169adb2b1" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:31:02.950" UserId="26960" Text="I would like to know if it's possible to have a Personal Message feature in SU. Sometimes I want to email a user or even a mod but I don't think it's possible. I think it could be usefull to share more information or link, references and other stuff.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if some money's needed, we can donate like 10$ or 50$ and get access to a secret place on SU to share info with mod, admin... or a Gold badge (Donation)! And also, get a free T-shirt when it's like 50$&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2247" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1197" RevisionGUID="5a2a9740-8ce1-4f51-a7cf-a4a169adb2b1" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:31:02.950" UserId="26960" Text="Private message feature" />
  <row Id="2248" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1197" RevisionGUID="5a2a9740-8ce1-4f51-a7cf-a4a169adb2b1" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:31:02.950" UserId="26960" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2249" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1198" RevisionGUID="f80d405a-fba0-45ca-9660-3c53945e3e2d" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:35:36.777" UserId="26960" Text="You should see the envelop next to your name become blue(SU), Red(SF)... and so on." />
  <row Id="2250" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1199" RevisionGUID="2a15efd8-4658-41cc-b861-04eba73badac" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:44:46.350" UserId="36565" Text="Currently `biometrics` is the more popular tag, at 4 questions, compared to `biometric` which only has one question. Which &lt;s&gt;is&lt;/s&gt; should be the canonical tag?" />
  <row Id="2251" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1199" RevisionGUID="2a15efd8-4658-41cc-b861-04eba73badac" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:44:46.350" UserId="36565" Text="Biometric or biometrics?" />
  <row Id="2252" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1199" RevisionGUID="2a15efd8-4658-41cc-b861-04eba73badac" CreationDate="2010-07-28T18:44:46.350" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="2253" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1200" RevisionGUID="a49ecb5e-6635-476b-bb27-0953a93ff382" CreationDate="2010-07-28T19:25:25.217" UserId="307" Text="You can flag for moderator attention, if you want a mod to look at something. Anything from a reconsideration after a wrongful close, answers that aren't answers, spam (flag as spam as well), recalculating your rep, suspicious votes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you would like to &quot;message&quot; another user, you can leave a comment on their answer for clarification or such.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you want to message another user on a post, but they aren't the one's who posted, you can [prepend their username with an at sign (@example) so that they will see it][1]. But only if they've already left a comment on the post you're replying to or have recently edited said post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/43019/how-do-comment-replies-work" />
  <row Id="2254" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1197" RevisionGUID="a3589016-0497-41e3-8efa-e3b2dfd7024a" CreationDate="2010-07-28T19:25:52.177" UserId="307" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;contact&gt;&lt;messaging&gt;" />
  <row Id="2255" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1193" RevisionGUID="2a139bfc-71da-4e89-8d7d-048cce4594fb" CreationDate="2010-07-29T05:43:14.303" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;feature&gt;&lt;interface&gt;" />
  <row Id="2256" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1201" RevisionGUID="e47f75a3-5a92-47ff-839b-2de794821746" CreationDate="2010-07-29T08:56:23.380" UserId="3110" Text="You will receive a notification only if someone answers your comment by using a [`@yourname` comment reply][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not everyone uses it though, so I suggest you use it even when you don't need it. For example, even if you know the person who posted the answer you comment on will get notified, use the `@hisname` when you write your comment, to suggest it's the way he got notified, so he will use it too (not needed with a regular user though, but it can help with new ones).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/43019/how-do-comment-replies-work" />
  <row Id="2257" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1196" RevisionGUID="7522ffde-57f0-4203-bcd8-2f372046feb1" CreationDate="2010-07-29T09:48:20.373" UserId="6734" Comment="added 74 characters in body" Text="when we answer a question if some one comment on my answer ( on the next login SU show us the comment(by the blue envelope)) but what if we comment on a question or comment other one answer how can we alert by SU that some one answer or say something about our comment(in this way the envelope don't become blue)." />
  <row Id="2258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1202" RevisionGUID="eeb2fc3b-d853-4dc1-8fcb-80977740a892" CreationDate="2010-07-29T10:41:43.270" UserId="62" Text="If I ask a question that for example is closed as a duplicate before anyone has answered it I won't be able to accept an answer (obviously). Will that question then count against my accept rate, since it has no accepted answer?" />
  <row Id="2259" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1202" RevisionGUID="eeb2fc3b-d853-4dc1-8fcb-80977740a892" CreationDate="2010-07-29T10:41:43.270" UserId="62" Text="Does closed questions without an answer count against my accept rate?" />
  <row Id="2260" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1202" RevisionGUID="eeb2fc3b-d853-4dc1-8fcb-80977740a892" CreationDate="2010-07-29T10:41:43.270" UserId="62" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;&lt;accept-rate&gt;" />
  <row Id="2261" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1203" RevisionGUID="324a0aea-d61c-4e58-a05e-399004ca0efd" CreationDate="2010-07-29T12:10:49.343" UserId="27272" Text="I really want to save this video as I love the show but I have some troubles with their fast English ...  so ... I asked here [any-idea-how-to-save-video-from-this-site][1] and the question was closed as off topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I read the faq, I went through metasuperuser but still cannot get why the question was closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/163517/any-idea-how-to-save-video-from-this-site-closed" />
  <row Id="2262" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1203" RevisionGUID="324a0aea-d61c-4e58-a05e-399004ca0efd" CreationDate="2010-07-29T12:10:49.343" UserId="27272" Text="saving streaming video played in web browser is off-topic on superuser?" />
  <row Id="2263" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1203" RevisionGUID="324a0aea-d61c-4e58-a05e-399004ca0efd" CreationDate="2010-07-29T12:10:49.343" UserId="27272" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;&lt;close-reasons&gt;&lt;reopen-closed&gt;" />
  <row Id="2264" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1204" RevisionGUID="77dfeb49-afd5-4f55-ac89-7fea191e42ec" CreationDate="2010-07-29T13:29:15.213" UserId="1548" Text="I'm not sure why it got closed as off-topic, but otherwise I would have closed it as not being a real question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not that there isn't a question, but I feel that you didn't put in sufficient effort for someone else to put in any to answer it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You did not take the effort to copy paste the question header into the body, so that it actually looks like a question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; http://ten.com.au/lie-to-me.htm&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; as my favourite firefox plugin doesn't&#xD;&#xA;&gt; work :-(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What is your favorite firefox pluging? I always like to think I'm a psychic, but I'm probably not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, it might be violating copyright, in which case we shouldn't be giving you the tools to do so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    2010 Copyright Network Ten&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So there you have it. This site is simply not appropriate for your question, sorry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1205" RevisionGUID="6b1a6bb4-d72b-46c8-87d1-3a1172a0ab00" CreationDate="2010-07-29T13:30:46.743" UserId="1548" Text="No they do not, at least from what I can calculate out my own questions and the accepted percentage there." />
  <row Id="2266" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1206" RevisionGUID="6509c48d-9235-40ea-8d2c-68b870746e0a" CreationDate="2010-07-29T14:58:36.040" UserId="717" Text="I came to SuperUser today to check an old question. The question have very good answers on it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/5940/hidden-features-of-the-iphone&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it gives me a 404. I suspect that it was moved to other site, but can't find it using Google.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would be great help if the 404 of a moved question can give the link of the new site hosting the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2267" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1206" RevisionGUID="6509c48d-9235-40ea-8d2c-68b870746e0a" CreationDate="2010-07-29T14:58:36.040" UserId="717" Text="Are questions being moved to other stackExchange sites? Where is my old SuperUser question?" />
  <row Id="2268" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1206" RevisionGUID="6509c48d-9235-40ea-8d2c-68b870746e0a" CreationDate="2010-07-29T14:58:36.040" UserId="717" Text="&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="2269" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1207" RevisionGUID="e44e49e5-f988-4e20-a2a3-932b06d645eb" CreationDate="2010-07-29T17:02:52.547" UserId="1548" Text="Nope it was deleted by @random&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is due to us moderators cleaning up Super User now that there are potentially new sites that cover these topics. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, whether it was useful or not, it was off-topic and therefore correctly deleted." />
  <row Id="2270" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1208" RevisionGUID="1b7bcf2c-4296-478f-8079-8d40b2b40739" CreationDate="2010-07-29T20:49:42.570" UserId="3110" Text="You can now find all the useful answers from your Super User question copied on the electronic gadgets site, on the corresponding question: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Undocumented iPhone features][1]. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I only left out one sarcastic answer and one which was apparently wrong (downvoted 3 times).*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gadgets.stackexchange.com/questions/252/undocumented-iphone-features" />
  <row Id="2271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1209" RevisionGUID="54d9a3b4-b286-4f39-b70e-bac1f20d25b8" CreationDate="2010-07-29T21:50:02.883" UserId="2804" Text="Given that a migration feature is [planned][1], why the rush to delete questions that will qualify for this? Can we not just leave these questions closed and migrate them when this the migration feature is available? Some of these questions (yes, a few of these were mine) have a lot of good content that is being lost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/52141/will-it-be-possible-to-migrate-questions-between-the-trilogy-and-the-stack-exchan" />
  <row Id="2272" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1209" RevisionGUID="54d9a3b4-b286-4f39-b70e-bac1f20d25b8" CreationDate="2010-07-29T21:50:02.883" UserId="2804" Text="Why the rush to delete migrateable SuperUser questions?" />
  <row Id="2273" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1209" RevisionGUID="54d9a3b4-b286-4f39-b70e-bac1f20d25b8" CreationDate="2010-07-29T21:50:02.883" UserId="2804" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;migration&gt;&lt;deleted-questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="2274" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1210" RevisionGUID="f7c61c68-47c2-4f17-bc4f-a405c4e9004d" CreationDate="2010-07-29T23:45:38.613" UserId="307" Text="No rush really. Just trying to clean SU up from all the migrated out and off-topic questions that are just hanging around like a bad smell. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Been meaning to do it for a while. Timing wasn't considered beyond how long a question has been festering, so those with at least a couple of months were the first to burn.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They can later be undeleted and migrated whenever that option comes around. And seeing as there is no guarantee that any SE site currently will live, that's up in the air." />
  <row Id="2275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1211" RevisionGUID="99f1acc5-1bf7-442b-974b-6f9ce8473bf8" CreationDate="2010-07-30T00:36:13.750" UserId="4377" Text="I think it ought to be `biometrics` rather than biometric.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Google brings out `Biometrics` in the first few pages when searched for `Biometric`&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Wikipedia redirects from `Biometric` to `Biometrics` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bing says otherwise, though&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/vV0d3.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/fs5aZ.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.imgur.com/2ftPK.jpg" />
  <row Id="2276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1212" RevisionGUID="6680b80d-dc19-430d-9556-45e5338d298c" CreationDate="2010-07-30T12:50:05.413" UserId="44499" Text="The **editing-help** page does not mention the simplest types of links:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Here's a really simple link to [Google].&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;      [google]: http://www.google.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are these types of links deliberately discouraged for some reason, or was it an oversight?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://stackoverflow.com/editing-help:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Basic Links&#xD;&#xA;&gt; -----------&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; There are three ways to write links.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Each is easier to read than the last:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt;     Here's an inline link to [Google](http://www.google.com/).&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     Here's a reference-style link to [Google][1].&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     Here's a very readable link to [Yahoo!][yahoo].&#xD;&#xA;&gt;     &#xD;&#xA;&gt;       [1]: http://www.google.com/&#xD;&#xA;&gt;       [yahoo]: http://www.yahoo.com/&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; The link definitions can appear&#xD;&#xA;&gt; anywhere in the document -- before or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; after the place where you use them.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; The link definition names [1] and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [yahoo] can be any unique string, and&#xD;&#xA;&gt; are case-insensitive; [yahoo] is the&#xD;&#xA;&gt; same as [YAHOO]." />
  <row Id="2277" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1212" RevisionGUID="6680b80d-dc19-430d-9556-45e5338d298c" CreationDate="2010-07-30T12:50:05.413" UserId="44499" Text="editing-help / links" />
  <row Id="2278" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1212" RevisionGUID="6680b80d-dc19-430d-9556-45e5338d298c" CreationDate="2010-07-30T12:50:05.413" UserId="44499" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2279" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1213" RevisionGUID="7c125523-ec3b-41c9-9373-a95c81d1d1d4" CreationDate="2010-07-30T13:30:36.597" UserId="6574" Text="Officially, how are we supposed to write Super User?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - SuperUser (NO space)&#xD;&#xA; - Super User (WITH space)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm constantly wondering about this whenever I go to write Super User, etc, and I've seen all styles of writing it...what do you think?" />
  <row Id="2280" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1213" RevisionGUID="7c125523-ec3b-41c9-9373-a95c81d1d1d4" CreationDate="2010-07-30T13:30:36.597" UserId="6574" Text="Super User or SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="2281" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1213" RevisionGUID="7c125523-ec3b-41c9-9373-a95c81d1d1d4" CreationDate="2010-07-30T13:30:36.597" UserId="6574" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="2282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1214" RevisionGUID="8a8b41f5-27f3-4add-82e6-e1f99abad041" CreationDate="2010-07-30T13:47:20.407" UserId="307" Text="Super User with the space. As seen in [the About][1] and FAQ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is a Q&amp;A site for computer enthusiasts that's free.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No space usually comes up when people CamelCase the URL and it just sticks for them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/about" />
  <row Id="2283" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1210" RevisionGUID="e3a8e444-a0c2-4f5e-9c35-bd1411db073f" CreationDate="2010-07-30T16:25:24.527" UserId="307" Comment="Have no fear, the revisionists are here. And they deleted things only when you're talking from the wrong side of your mouth, while you were sleeping wide awake. Put your pants on before they come over though. That's just polite." Text="No rush really. Just trying to clean SU up from all the migrated out and off-topic questions that are just hanging around like a bad smell. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Been meaning to do it for a while. Timing wasn't considered beyond how long a question has been festering, so those with at least a couple of months were the first to burn.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They can later be undeleted and migrated whenever that option comes around. And seeing as there is no guarantee that any SE site currently will live, that's up in the air.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They can also be accessed if you download the [Creative Commons Data Dump for SU][1]. If a bulk of deletion is happening in one particular month, you should be able to download the month before that to see and reuse, with attribution, the data and posts from it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which may be handy if you want to cherry-pick through questions and answers to repost on the new Stack Exchange sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/category/cc-wiki-dump/" />
  <row Id="2284" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1216" RevisionGUID="1f40c064-8fc0-45ab-a915-8eb00702378b" CreationDate="2010-07-31T08:06:08.337" Text="I'm new as well, and discovered the site similarly to the situation you present... however I can understand the desire to limit upvoting to 'vested' accounts. Otherwise it will be gamed in ways harmful to the community.  Read the FAQ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also this topic is likely more appropriate for http://meta.superuser.com/" />
  <row Id="2285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1217" RevisionGUID="ce47c29c-aa8d-4736-a89f-5d4a2f681b5d" CreationDate="2010-07-31T08:26:00.883" Text="That's because we don't want people to simply register many accounts and start voting themselves up. " />
  <row Id="2286" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1215" RevisionGUID="d5062752-89d9-4753-a73a-a4feba065775" CreationDate="2010-07-31T07:59:54.177" UserDisplayName="user44705" Text="Situation:&#xD;&#xA;1) I am an expert software professional&#xD;&#xA;2) I recently found superuser.com from a search engine, because I found a particular Q&amp;A useful&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Desire:&#xD;&#xA;1) Vote the two answers as useful&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Problem:&#xD;&#xA;I am not allowed to because I have to EARN reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question:&#xD;&#xA;As in real life, if we assume the people we meet are reputable, then they do something that causes their reputation to sink, it's understandable when we change our attitude about them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At superuser.com, why do we have to earn the right to vote?  Why not make this same assumption on superuser.com, and if enough people think someone's reputation is bad, their votes can be removed?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2287" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1215" RevisionGUID="d5062752-89d9-4753-a73a-a4feba065775" CreationDate="2010-07-31T07:59:54.177" UserDisplayName="user44705" Text="Wouldn't it be better to reverse the reputation used by superuser.com?" />
  <row Id="2288" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1215" RevisionGUID="d5062752-89d9-4753-a73a-a4feba065775" CreationDate="2010-07-31T07:59:54.177" UserDisplayName="user44705" Text="&lt;superuser&gt;" />
  <row Id="2289" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1215" RevisionGUID="dddafc55-2377-469c-8c0b-f80a71657881" CreationDate="2010-07-31T08:28:29.680" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/170152/wouldnt-it-be-better-to-reverse-the-reputation-used-by-superuser-com" Text="" />
  <row Id="2290" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1218" RevisionGUID="280428bb-64f2-47ce-a058-223bc2adf185" CreationDate="2010-07-31T08:33:27.693" UserId="1548" Text="As @Cor and @Ngu already stated: we don't want people to game the system or use it to spam, so there's a threshold to prevent them from doing so.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, it only takes one good answer and/or question to receive enough rep to be able to upvote. If you also have a Stack Exchange or Stack Overflow account where you already have some rep, you can associate them and receive a +100 rep bonus to your Super User account (given that the original has more than 200 rep).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the end though, we want our users to participate and built up their own reputation for being competent here. I wouldn't know how to assess your worth in rep based on your current real life situation. And as long as you give high quality answers, you shouldn't have to worry either!" />
  <row Id="2291" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1219" RevisionGUID="b5c71f4b-e870-4b84-9367-7524d76c22ed" CreationDate="2010-07-31T10:07:34.463" UserId="38330" Text="There is a small reputation threshold before one can vote, which is 15. This enables most users to start voting on items very quickly, and prevents new sockpuppet accounts with no real contribution from voting a particular user up." />
  <row Id="2292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1220" RevisionGUID="a732952a-a26e-4808-b40d-672ea9aeafc1" CreationDate="2010-08-01T00:03:57.317" UserId="36565" Text="http://superuser.com/questions/148385/usb-write-protected is closed as a duplicate of&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/112401/why-would-disks-mysteriously-become-write-protected which is closed as a duplicate of&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/158083/how-to-remove-the-write-protection-from-an-usb-flash-disk which is closed as a duplicate of the first question,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/148385/usb-write-protected. Funnily enough, these questions were all closed by [random ♦][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/307/random" />
  <row Id="2293" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1220" RevisionGUID="a732952a-a26e-4808-b40d-672ea9aeafc1" CreationDate="2010-08-01T00:03:57.317" UserId="36565" Text="Close as duplicate loop" />
  <row Id="2294" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1220" RevisionGUID="a732952a-a26e-4808-b40d-672ea9aeafc1" CreationDate="2010-08-01T00:03:57.317" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2295" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="411" RevisionGUID="adfe2e19-3d5c-4c13-bda6-caeaa214fb59" CreationDate="2010-08-01T00:04:21.637" UserId="36565" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="2296" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1221" RevisionGUID="ead387a2-145c-4ec4-9ba6-ad58d6e96b89" CreationDate="2010-08-01T00:18:30.403" UserId="36565" Text="And some of these aren't even meta questions... I'd retag them all myself, but I don't want to fill the front page with old questions. http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/superuser" />
  <row Id="2297" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1221" RevisionGUID="ead387a2-145c-4ec4-9ba6-ad58d6e96b89" CreationDate="2010-08-01T00:18:30.403" UserId="36565" Text=" 14  questions tagged superuser" />
  <row Id="2298" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1221" RevisionGUID="ead387a2-145c-4ec4-9ba6-ad58d6e96b89" CreationDate="2010-08-01T00:18:30.403" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1222" RevisionGUID="9fcb0dee-a2d1-4457-9b70-c92990a55397" CreationDate="2010-08-01T02:11:20.780" UserId="307" Text="Deleted all those that were Meta related. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since there are only seven left, go ahead and retag them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It'll be a minor flooding on the front page, but it'll be quick.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They do look like they're valid uses of the **`[superuser]`** tag though." />
  <row Id="2300" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1223" RevisionGUID="d308d687-2da6-45c8-90f4-e75b887ad456" CreationDate="2010-08-01T02:17:26.667" UserId="307" Text="Could have sworn that one of them was being left open as the canonical resource on this strange flipping. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since [Remove the write protection from an USB disk][1] has two answers, and mentions more of what could happen along with the remedy, it's re-opened.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/158083/remove-the-write-protection-from-an-usb-flash-disk" />
  <row Id="2301" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1220" RevisionGUID="b272595e-b69b-4069-b58a-eb9dfc08e344" CreationDate="2010-08-01T02:18:14.077" UserId="307" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="2302" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1215" RevisionGUID="d459e089-df79-4c6c-9221-76b6dd4f4e87" CreationDate="2010-08-01T02:18:57.693" UserId="307" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;&lt;voting&gt;" />
  <row Id="2303" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="590" RevisionGUID="3984496d-3eea-4f4b-9575-44aaf835b8df" CreationDate="2010-08-01T22:55:40.807" UserId="36565" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="2304" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="182" RevisionGUID="0c10ef98-df90-4b21-983f-8c786112a21c" CreationDate="2010-08-01T22:55:58.183" UserId="36565" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;internet-explorer&gt;" />
  <row Id="2305" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="171" RevisionGUID="27c853c8-8257-4d9b-b2af-c028a93756c1" CreationDate="2010-08-01T22:56:18.307" UserId="36565" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="2306" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1182" RevisionGUID="78e13ccc-73de-4e92-bc5e-d657571e0a5a" CreationDate="2010-08-01T23:06:48.953" UserId="36565" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;tag-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="2312" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1225" RevisionGUID="1a736653-f0eb-44d4-a0d9-478564345645" CreationDate="2010-08-03T00:20:53.260" UserId="24737" Text="Some thread like [this][1] can make text looks like keyboard icon. I didn't see in the [edit help][2]. Can anyone let me know how to do that? Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/113103/how-can-i-move-around-the-bash-commandline-efficiently&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/editing-help" />
  <row Id="2313" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1225" RevisionGUID="1a736653-f0eb-44d4-a0d9-478564345645" CreationDate="2010-08-03T00:20:53.260" UserId="24737" Text="How to make the text looks like keyboard icon in SuperUser thread" />
  <row Id="2314" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1225" RevisionGUID="1a736653-f0eb-44d4-a0d9-478564345645" CreationDate="2010-08-03T00:20:53.260" UserId="24737" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1226" RevisionGUID="fef0c0e3-f0a8-4bd3-8759-ccf93a7ae2fa" CreationDate="2010-08-03T01:19:43.493" UserId="1339" Text="&amp;lt;kbd&amp;gt;ABC&amp;lt;/kbd&amp;gt; would be &lt;kbd&gt;ABC&lt;/kbd&gt; however it doesn't show up correctly on Meta.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;FWIW, a [standing question on meta.stackoverflow](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/36785/could-the-kbd-tag-be-added-to-the-stackoverflow-editing-help) has been open since January 23rd asking for it be added to the editing help." />
  <row Id="2316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1227" RevisionGUID="e6d4af8e-6a81-43ac-a165-0302d8540fad" CreationDate="2010-08-03T02:02:04.207" UserId="36565" Text="Title says it all." />
  <row Id="2317" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1227" RevisionGUID="e6d4af8e-6a81-43ac-a165-0302d8540fad" CreationDate="2010-08-03T02:02:04.207" UserId="36565" Text="Merge ram and memory?" />
  <row Id="2318" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1227" RevisionGUID="e6d4af8e-6a81-43ac-a165-0302d8540fad" CreationDate="2010-08-03T02:02:04.207" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;support&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2320" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1228" RevisionGUID="6c21c53c-bbdc-4b37-959b-76a89a20c56a" CreationDate="2010-08-03T09:42:21.070" UserId="4386" Text="I don't think this is a bad request, but I am not sure which.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think memory is more accurate but, many non techie people may get it confused with hard drive space where as RAM can only mean one thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are arguments with both, but to prevent confusion, I think it should be RAM." />
  <row Id="2321" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1229" RevisionGUID="3d09a3be-2a25-4a5c-9d5e-740e3a5c0080" CreationDate="2010-08-03T10:19:21.213" UserId="36601" Text="But let's not forget that we have non-RAM related memory questions! Like [this][1] one for example. Maybe we should encourage users somehow to use RAM tag more and leave memory for more general questions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/171196/need-help-in-analyzing-memory-dump" />
  <row Id="2322" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1230" RevisionGUID="231311df-60e7-4136-ab48-df2e6bb05076" CreationDate="2010-08-03T12:45:22.757" UserId="39366" Text="I've recently gained the rep to retag, so when I saw [this][1] question and didn't think the `energy` tag made sense (yes it's about *energy*, but really something like &quot;energy efficiency&quot; would be more relevant) I decided to change it, so went to search for the current &quot;standard&quot; tag for that type of question and found there is instead a mess of similar tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]:http://superuser.com/questions/171362/multicore-cpu-energy-requirement-and-load-balancing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I've only recently gained the rep to retag I thought I'd defer this to the community, rather than go on an unguided retagging spree.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the following tags are all used for the same purpose:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* energy (6 questions)&#xD;&#xA;* energy-saver (2)&#xD;&#xA;* power-consumption (13)&#xD;&#xA;* power-efficiency (2)&#xD;&#xA;* powersave (4)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also an `efficiency` tag with 6, but those questions seem to be more about personal / time efficenty - not electrical energy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, there is the `electricity` tag with 45, which I think is being used for the same purposes *some of the time*, but for some other purposes as well - [brownouts][2], [electrocution][3] and [preventing damage][4] for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://superuser.com/questions/131490/few-questions-on-clone-zilla&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://superuser.com/questions/127387/what-will-happen-if-i-accidentally-pour-a-bucket-of-water-inside-my-pc&#xD;&#xA;[4]: http://superuser.com/questions/133864/whats-the-best-way-to-spray-paint-the-inside-of-my-case&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think those I've bulletted need to be merged and/or have synonyms (I guess the primary tag should be `power-consumption`?), and then adjust those in `electricity` that match? Does that make sense?" />
  <row Id="2323" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1230" RevisionGUID="231311df-60e7-4136-ab48-df2e6bb05076" CreationDate="2010-08-03T12:45:22.757" UserId="39366" Text="Grouping various tags regarding energy efficiency" />
  <row Id="2324" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1230" RevisionGUID="231311df-60e7-4136-ab48-df2e6bb05076" CreationDate="2010-08-03T12:45:22.757" UserId="39366" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="2325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1231" RevisionGUID="bbe902d7-5734-4824-8b57-db7a451268b1" CreationDate="2010-08-03T14:31:52.087" UserId="5144" Text="I recently posted something and it ended up being edited. I couldn't really understand what was changed but suspect that it could help make me a better poster because nothing changed visually but it was labeled as markdown-ify and I'm sure there was something wrong with the basic structure of what I posted originally. Anyway I'd love to know what I can do to be the best member I can. Edits are at &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/posts/170201/revisions" />
  <row Id="2326" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1231" RevisionGUID="bbe902d7-5734-4824-8b57-db7a451268b1" CreationDate="2010-08-03T14:31:52.087" UserId="5144" Text="Need help understanding edits to a post." />
  <row Id="2327" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1231" RevisionGUID="bbe902d7-5734-4824-8b57-db7a451268b1" CreationDate="2010-08-03T14:31:52.087" UserId="5144" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="2328" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1232" RevisionGUID="fb7d9b68-2d1c-4407-87da-4a19508a3967" CreationDate="2010-08-03T15:00:39.563" UserId="39366" Text="It's been changed from a manual list to a markdown list.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first just becomes a set of `p`aragraph tags.  &#xD;&#xA;The latter is converted in to proper html `ol` (ordered list) element.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you've not already seen it before, have a look at the [Markdown Edit Help][1] page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://superuser.com/editing-help" />
  <row Id="2329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1233" RevisionGUID="7869df29-cb83-44f2-b352-4f92e056ffe3" CreationDate="2010-08-03T20:58:40.113" UserId="14664" Text="A couple of times recently, I've started answering a question and by the time I have posted my answer, another has appeared.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the past, I have received a notification at the top of the screen offering to show the new answer(s), but this no longer seems to be happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a bug, a deliberate act on the part of the site's owners or is it me?" />
  <row Id="2330" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1233" RevisionGUID="7869df29-cb83-44f2-b352-4f92e056ffe3" CreationDate="2010-08-03T20:58:40.113" UserId="14664" Text="Is the notification of other new answers whilst typing an answer broken?" />
  <row Id="2331" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1233" RevisionGUID="7869df29-cb83-44f2-b352-4f92e056ffe3" CreationDate="2010-08-03T20:58:40.113" UserId="14664" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="2332" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1227" RevisionGUID="18935997-cce4-40f4-ad89-b261f6f60507" CreationDate="2010-08-04T02:42:00.047" UserId="36565" Comment="happy?; added 109 characters in body; added 5 characters in body" Text="[ram] has 277 questions; [memory] has 296. Should we:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Merge the two into [ram]?&#xD;&#xA; 2. Merge the two into [memory]?&#xD;&#xA; 3. Leave both of them alone?&#xD;&#xA; 4. Retag [memory] questions that aren't about RAM into another tag, and retag [ram] into [memory]?&#xD;&#xA; 5. Retag [memory][memory] questions that aren't about RAM into another tag, and retag the remaining [memory] questions into [ram]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [ram]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ram&#xD;&#xA;  [memory]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/memory" />
  <row Id="2333" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1234" RevisionGUID="d1138f7c-ec4a-424d-b653-17b922fd15cf" CreationDate="2010-08-04T07:46:42.637" UserId="3110" Text="The notification takes some time to appear, it's not instant. So if you posted it less than a minute after, it's possible that it didn't have the time to notify you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it was a longer time like 5 minutes, then it seems more like a bug indeed." />
  <row Id="2334" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1233" RevisionGUID="b22d7e3a-d77b-4e11-b447-32b8024ddaa1" CreationDate="2010-08-04T07:47:15.753" UserId="3110" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;answers&gt;&lt;notification&gt;" />
  <row Id="2335" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1235" RevisionGUID="9e3397a4-27c2-4dcf-8888-c44ccb97f6dd" CreationDate="2010-08-04T13:50:25.843" UserId="36601" Text="Where should questions which are directly related to SuperUser problems be placed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First such question I found out about is [this][1] one. It seems to be related to Super User so SuperUser looks like a logical place to ask it, but on the other hand it's about web service and we agreed that such questions aren't welcome.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So what I'm asking is which of these four option is correct:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question is related to SuperUser and should be asked on SuperUser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question is related to SuperUser and should be asked on Meta because it's about a web-service and is off-topic on SuperUser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question is related to a webservice and is off-topic and should be closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Something else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/171876/" />
  <row Id="2336" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1235" RevisionGUID="9e3397a4-27c2-4dcf-8888-c44ccb97f6dd" CreationDate="2010-08-04T13:50:25.843" UserId="36601" Text="Where should questions which are directly related to SuperUser problems be placed?" />
  <row Id="2337" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1235" RevisionGUID="9e3397a4-27c2-4dcf-8888-c44ccb97f6dd" CreationDate="2010-08-04T13:50:25.843" UserId="36601" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1236" RevisionGUID="b36217f6-6877-4ea1-b1da-36e941ff0bde" CreationDate="2010-08-04T15:15:24.333" UserId="1548" Text="It's closed and I referred the person to our web related SE-sites" />
  <row Id="2339" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1227" RevisionGUID="422aa0f4-f6f1-4ed6-a2ae-8dae42a03a79" CreationDate="2010-08-04T18:06:08.700" UserId="36565" Comment="added 6 characters in body; added 4 characters in body" Text="[[ram]] has 277 questions; [[memory]] has 296. Should we:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Merge the two into [[ram]]?&#xD;&#xA; 2. Merge the two into [[memory]]?&#xD;&#xA; 3. Leave both of them alone?&#xD;&#xA; 4. Retag [[memory]] questions that aren't about RAM into another tag, and retag [[ram]] into [[memory]]?&#xD;&#xA; 5. Retag [[memory]] questions that aren't about RAM into another tag, and retag the remaining [[memory]] questions into [[ram]]?&#xD;&#xA;  [ram]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ram&#xD;&#xA;  [memory]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/memory" />
  <row Id="2340" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1227" RevisionGUID="cdd39e25-3ab8-4abd-9597-e68ce838a98c" CreationDate="2010-08-04T22:23:33.380" UserId="36565" Comment="added 220 characters in body" Text="[[ram]] has 277 questions; [[memory]] has 296. Should we:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. Merge the two into [[ram]]?&#xD;&#xA; 2. Merge the two into [[memory]]?&#xD;&#xA; 3. Leave both of them alone?&#xD;&#xA; 4. Retag [[memory]] questions that aren't about RAM into another tag, and retag [[ram]] into [[memory]]?&#xD;&#xA; 5. Retag [[memory]] questions that aren't about RAM into another tag, and retag the remaining [[memory]] questions into [[ram]]?&#xD;&#xA; 6. Retag [[memory]] questions that aren't about RAM into another tag, retag the remaining [[memory]] questions into [[ram]], then retag the questions that were temporarily retagged back into [[memory]]? (probably not)&#xD;&#xA;  [ram]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ram&#xD;&#xA;  [memory]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/memory" />
  <row Id="2341" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1230" RevisionGUID="03306364-ffd8-4196-bc2d-4fae70bd0600" CreationDate="2010-08-05T07:59:36.870" UserId="39366" Comment="added 145 characters in body; added 2 characters in body" Text="I've recently gained the rep to retag, so when I saw [this][1] question and didn't think the `energy` tag made sense (yes it's about *energy*, but really something like &quot;energy efficiency&quot; would be more relevant) I decided to change it, so went to search for the current &quot;standard&quot; tag for that type of question and found there is instead a mess of similar tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]:http://superuser.com/questions/171362/multicore-cpu-energy-requirement-and-load-balancing&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since I've only recently gained the rep to retag I thought I'd defer this to the community, rather than go on an unguided retagging spree.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the following tags are all used for the same purpose:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* energy (6 questions)&#xD;&#xA;* energy-saver (2)&#xD;&#xA;* power-consumption (13)&#xD;&#xA;* power-efficiency (2)&#xD;&#xA;* powersave (4)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also an `efficiency` tag with 6, but those questions seem to be more about personal / time efficenty - not electrical energy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Then, there is the `electricity` tag with 45, which I think is being used for the same purposes *some of the time*, but for some other purposes as well - [brownouts][2], [electrocution][3] and [preventing damage][4] for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://superuser.com/questions/131490/few-questions-on-clone-zilla&#xD;&#xA;[3]: http://superuser.com/questions/127387/what-will-happen-if-i-accidentally-pour-a-bucket-of-water-inside-my-pc&#xD;&#xA;[4]: http://superuser.com/questions/133864/whats-the-best-way-to-spray-paint-the-inside-of-my-case&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think those I've bulletted need to be merged and/or have synonyms (I guess the primary tag should be `power-consumption`?), and then adjust those in `electricity` that match? Does that make sense?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Edit&#xD;&#xA;Since no one's responsed, I shall go and re-tag these once I'm home this evening, unless someone decides to say otherwise before then." />
  <row Id="2342" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1164" RevisionGUID="6246f98e-eb9d-479a-a4ca-114fb3009f25" CreationDate="2010-08-05T11:32:51.190" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;" />
  <row Id="2343" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1166" RevisionGUID="71f13b0e-fc21-4ea1-95e4-a0e214cced91" CreationDate="2010-08-05T11:33:10.893" UserId="1" Comment="added 73 characters in body" Text="Unlikely, as we have a standard position for that link across the entire network.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And meta *is* really important.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: it turns out we needed that space, so this was indeed changed.." />
  <row Id="2344" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1237" RevisionGUID="e06f7768-3d37-4c97-8376-e7540187b4e9" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:45:14.463" UserId="31713" Text="Now that http://gaming.stackexchange.com/ exists, can we migrate questions that were previously closed as off-topic because they are related to gaming to it? Specifically, I'd like to move [this question][1]. I could just copy and paste it as a new question, but that somehow feels wrong to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/142981/what-games-work-well-on-macbook-pro-i7-geforce-gt-330m-within-vmware-fusion-c" />
  <row Id="2345" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1237" RevisionGUID="e06f7768-3d37-4c97-8376-e7540187b4e9" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:45:14.463" UserId="31713" Text="Migrate previously closed question to Gaming?" />
  <row Id="2346" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1237" RevisionGUID="e06f7768-3d37-4c97-8376-e7540187b4e9" CreationDate="2010-08-05T17:45:14.463" UserId="31713" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;&lt;migration&gt;&lt;gaming&gt;" />
  <row Id="2347" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1238" RevisionGUID="1767519d-f2b8-402a-949e-6121aa2cc49c" CreationDate="2010-08-05T19:49:57.603" UserId="39366" Text="Done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Result was to keep 20 as `power-consumption`, and also 7 as `powersave` (for those RE the power *settings* on machines, maybe could do with a better name...) with some shuffling between the lot." />
  <row Id="2348" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1239" RevisionGUID="9e9ad0de-26bf-418b-bfa1-26f331a24a56" CreationDate="2010-08-05T22:37:18.830" UserId="307" Text="Cannot migrate. At least not for now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best just copy and paste that sucker right into a new question o'er yonder at Gaming. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or prod the OP if you don't want to have to select the best answer in its next life." />
  <row Id="2354" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1241" RevisionGUID="6960cde9-33cc-44c9-a043-5fb5688ea1c4" CreationDate="2010-08-07T07:00:14.440" UserId="35496" Text="I have written this question: [Is there a quick key command that will switch frames in Flash?][1] and have not gotten answers for a month and only 29 views. I think that qualifies for a Tumbleweed badge, does it not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/151900/is-there-a-quick-key-command-that-will-switch-frames-in-flash" />
  <row Id="2355" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1241" RevisionGUID="6960cde9-33cc-44c9-a043-5fb5688ea1c4" CreationDate="2010-08-07T07:00:14.440" UserId="35496" Text="Shouldn't I get tumbleweed badge?" />
  <row Id="2356" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1241" RevisionGUID="6960cde9-33cc-44c9-a043-5fb5688ea1c4" CreationDate="2010-08-07T07:00:14.440" UserId="35496" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;badges&gt;" />
  <row Id="2359" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1242" RevisionGUID="7adb0277-14c8-4ef2-8a70-44c78cffc6cb" CreationDate="2010-08-08T07:51:27.427" UserId="39366" Text="Check the timeline for your question - http://superuser.com/posts/151900/timeline -&#xD;&#xA;you received a +1 vote on the day that you posted the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As random indicated in the comments, given this was in the first week it will have blocked you from getting the badge for this question." />
  <row Id="2360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1243" RevisionGUID="4c8006c0-6dc1-463d-af0e-ca25e081af0a" CreationDate="2010-08-09T03:55:32.737" UserId="310" Text="I'm getting &quot;Oops! Something Bad Happened!&quot; on the right side of some SU pages (but not other sites). It looks like part of a page header, navbar and footer with a broken image placeholder with the URL http://superuser.com/content/cso/img/error-statler-and-waldorf.jpg." />
  <row Id="2361" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1243" RevisionGUID="4c8006c0-6dc1-463d-af0e-ca25e081af0a" CreationDate="2010-08-09T03:55:32.737" UserId="310" Text="Oops! Something Bad Happened!" />
  <row Id="2362" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1243" RevisionGUID="4c8006c0-6dc1-463d-af0e-ca25e081af0a" CreationDate="2010-08-09T03:55:32.737" UserId="310" Text="&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="2363" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1244" RevisionGUID="4e30a2c7-13f1-4ca6-b9ef-38006c356618" CreationDate="2010-08-09T15:11:25.757" UserId="36565" Text="Probably, but since there are already 12 questions tagged [[windows-7-x64]], I figure I should ask first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [windows-7-x64]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows-7-x64" />
  <row Id="2364" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1244" RevisionGUID="4e30a2c7-13f1-4ca6-b9ef-38006c356618" CreationDate="2010-08-09T15:11:25.757" UserId="36565" Text="Retag windows-7-x64 to windows-7 and 64-bit?" />
  <row Id="2365" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1244" RevisionGUID="4e30a2c7-13f1-4ca6-b9ef-38006c356618" CreationDate="2010-08-09T15:11:25.757" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2366" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1245" RevisionGUID="7214c747-f9cb-480f-8439-fd51073f77eb" CreationDate="2010-08-09T18:41:26.780" UserId="15555" Text="2 request features&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1°) The number of sites is just multiplying like a rabbit. It is obvious that categories can overlap so closing a thread without automatically forwarding to the supposedly better site is really a loss in productivity. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2°) The FAQ is absolutly generic and so useless you don't even know what are the list of sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;By the way if the moderators were less pretentious one could live in a better world." />
  <row Id="2367" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1245" RevisionGUID="7214c747-f9cb-480f-8439-fd51073f77eb" CreationDate="2010-08-09T18:41:26.780" UserId="15555" Text="Too many sites, thread are closed without redirecting to other site and without any explanation" />
  <row Id="2368" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1245" RevisionGUID="7214c747-f9cb-480f-8439-fd51073f77eb" CreationDate="2010-08-09T18:41:26.780" UserId="15555" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2369" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1246" RevisionGUID="78bfc2b7-a6fc-4e65-b528-0fa30d1e6816" CreationDate="2010-08-09T19:36:57.840" UserId="307" Text="For the most part, when a question is closed off-topic, it doesn't mean it has to fit somewhere on another node on the SO/SE chain of sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But if it does, then there will often be a comment directing the OP to the better, more suited, place to ask that question. One where it will be on-topic." />
  <row Id="2370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1247" RevisionGUID="44092075-5c57-4456-bd2a-2d6e54c53423" CreationDate="2010-08-09T20:39:50.560" UserId="3110" Text="The number of sites multiplying are for now in beta. There is no guarantee they will exist, 3 months from now. This is why they are not referenced in the FAQ or why there is no way to migrate questions to them, for now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You can find them however on the [Stack Exchange link][1], on the top left.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Like Random said, however, the other sites have nothing to do with the fact a question is off-topic or not. This is per site, and defined in the FAQ. The Super User FAQ has been [defined and refined in the last year][2], to have a precise scope. It is in my opinion specific enough as of today.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you see improvements that can be done, feel free to propose them. The sites are being defined by their community, this is how it worked the past year, this is how it will keep working.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.superuser.com/questions/757/update-the-superuser-faq" />
  <row Id="2371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1249" RevisionGUID="58581943-57df-40b3-ad3d-c0a03b7b51d9" CreationDate="2010-08-09T20:17:26.213" Text="Click on your username at the top of the page, go to &quot;accounts&quot;, look for &quot;copy super user profile to related accounts&quot; (I've never tried it).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;BTW: Off topic ;-)" />
  <row Id="2372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1248" RevisionGUID="0da08e38-c144-4f85-80c0-70d113424db4" CreationDate="2010-08-09T19:46:52.340" Text="Is there a way that I can easily synchronize my profiles between the Stack Exchange websites?  It would be even better if I could just use the same profile across their websites.  Thanks." />
  <row Id="2373" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1248" RevisionGUID="0da08e38-c144-4f85-80c0-70d113424db4" CreationDate="2010-08-09T19:46:52.340" Text="Synchronization of Profiles Between Stack Exchange Webistes" />
  <row Id="2374" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1248" RevisionGUID="0da08e38-c144-4f85-80c0-70d113424db4" CreationDate="2010-08-09T19:46:52.340" Text="&lt;user-profiles&gt;&lt;stack-exchange&gt;" />
  <row Id="2375" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1248" RevisionGUID="59e7d482-9e67-4ae3-9d98-e9ba0134f590" CreationDate="2010-08-09T22:00:20.313" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/173937/synchronization-of-profiles-between-stack-exchange-webistes" Text="" />
  <row Id="2376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1250" RevisionGUID="33a51768-04fe-4f68-9e5c-b15709d1dfc2" CreationDate="2010-08-10T17:37:48.997" UserId="9666" Text="*What's next?* [windows-7-professional-x64]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think we should just retag [windows-7-x64] as [windows-7] and [64-bit]...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's suppose it's tagged [windows-7-x64], it won't show up under the tag [windows-7] or [64 bit]. *Bad...*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should all those questions be retagged to [windows-7-x64] and force users to type that? *That's wrong...*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2377" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1250" RevisionGUID="04d02e9c-c853-4569-8b6b-950b4f8d3ce3" CreationDate="2010-08-11T12:24:36.527" UserId="9666" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="*What's next?* [windows-7-professional-x64]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also think we should just retag [windows-7-x64] as [windows-7] and [64-bit]...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Let's suppose it's tagged [windows-7-x64], it won't show up under the tag [windows-7] or [64 bit]. *Bad...*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should all those questions be retagged to [windows-7-x64] and force users to type that? *That's wrong...*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2378" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1251" RevisionGUID="951a657f-4a5a-4eaa-a155-2a8b1bfce125" CreationDate="2010-08-11T16:03:04.063" UserId="9666" Text="The **Unanswered** tab at the top shows that there are more than 8,000 unanswered questions, it also seems to increase every day. I think it's a bad behavior that this keeps increasing...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Let's take a look at the oldest question...**&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;[Setting up synergy (multi-computer shared input devices) new to mac][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The user indicates that his question is answered.  &#xD;&#xA;None of the answers have been upvoted and he hasn't accepted a solution either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is an example of an unanswered question that is actually answered,  &#xD;&#xA;and I believe there are a lot more questions that tend to have the same issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**This leads me to several problems/suggestions...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I could upvote those questions, but there is a voting cap.  &#xD;&#xA;   Besides the voting cap this would also prevent me from getting the Electorate badge...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Moderators could accept solutions, and 3k and 10k users could vote/flag to accept solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Users should have a reminder to improve there question or accept an answer after a time period,  &#xD;&#xA;I suppose there is one but I still see lots of users not accept the final answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Other cases:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Users that solve their question right after they post it before others do, they leave it unanswered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just think we should find a solution for this so the history of the unanswered list gets more useful, then it's easier to go through old questions and to find answers for those and maybe even to get awarded for answering those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: Feel free to add other cases and examples that could fill the unanswered list...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/97687/setting-up-synergy-multi-computer-shared-input-devices-new-to-mac" />
  <row Id="2379" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1251" RevisionGUID="951a657f-4a5a-4eaa-a155-2a8b1bfce125" CreationDate="2010-08-11T16:03:04.063" UserId="9666" Text="Unanswered questions that are answered without upvotes or accepted answers." />
  <row Id="2380" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1251" RevisionGUID="951a657f-4a5a-4eaa-a155-2a8b1bfce125" CreationDate="2010-08-11T16:03:04.063" UserId="9666" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2381" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1251" RevisionGUID="39f0a1fc-59cf-4b14-8d3d-105724f49e7c" CreationDate="2010-08-11T16:09:58.053" UserId="9666" Comment="added 162 characters in body" Text="The **Unanswered** tab at the top shows that there are more than 8,000 unanswered questions, it also seems to increase every day. I think it's a bad behavior that this keeps increasing...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't understand me wrong, I'm not nitpicking...  &#xD;&#xA;This tab is the feature I use the most and while it works for new questions, it doesn't work for old ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Let's take a look at the oldest question...**&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;[Setting up synergy (multi-computer shared input devices) new to mac][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The user indicates that his question is answered.  &#xD;&#xA;None of the answers have been upvoted and he hasn't accepted a solution either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is an example of an unanswered question that is actually answered,  &#xD;&#xA;and I believe there are a lot more questions that tend to have the same issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**This leads me to several problems/suggestions...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I could upvote those questions, but there is a voting cap.  &#xD;&#xA;   Besides the voting cap this would also prevent me from getting the Electorate badge...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Moderators could accept solutions, and 3k and 10k users could vote/flag to accept solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Users should have a reminder to improve there question or accept an answer after a time period,  &#xD;&#xA;I suppose there is one but I still see lots of users not accept the final answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Other cases:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Users that solve their question right after they post it before others do, they leave it unanswered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just think we should find a solution for this so the history of the unanswered list gets more useful, then it's easier to go through old questions and to find answers for those and maybe even to get awarded for answering those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: Feel free to add other cases and examples that could fill the unanswered list...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/97687/setting-up-synergy-multi-computer-shared-input-devices-new-to-mac" />
  <row Id="2382" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1252" RevisionGUID="efb332b6-8737-48ea-8e7e-f17ddcfb2104" CreationDate="2010-08-11T16:29:34.440" UserId="34844" Text="Is it not an idea to inform users on how tags work and what importance they have? I'd say that raising the limits will only move the problem. As long as users don't get why they're creating tags anyway and how important uniformity is, I don't think it's going to work... As we say in the Netherlands, it'll be &quot;mopping the floor while leaving the tap open&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't disagree with the limit increase though, especially not for tag creation." />
  <row Id="2383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1253" RevisionGUID="8ac7482d-98c3-4a17-a3af-b070a817822a" CreationDate="2010-08-11T16:32:33.540" UserId="1548" Text="What is it really you have a problem with? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fact that these questions pop up as unanswered while they obviously are, so they clutter your search for new questions to answer? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because really the signal to noise ratio isn't that terrible, especially since I believe most of these questions will be fairly old, so it's not a trend or growing problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Changing the status of these questions however, will have no influence on their usefulness. If it's answered and someone stumbles on our site with the same problem, the answer will also solve his problem. Regardless of the amount of upvotes or accepted answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do agree it would be nice to filter these questions, to be able to find questions I can answer and/or that are worth trying to effort without having my results cluttered with false positives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2384" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1253" RevisionGUID="762121ff-8722-49d5-aa38-1f4f7d93043a" CreationDate="2010-08-11T17:11:41.177" UserId="1548" Comment="added 512 characters in body" Text="What is it really you have a problem with? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fact that these questions pop up as unanswered while they obviously are, so they clutter your search for new questions to answer? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because really the signal to noise ratio isn't that terrible, especially since I believe most of these questions will be fairly old, so it's not a trend or growing problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Changing the status of these questions however, will have no influence on their usefulness. If it's answered and someone stumbles on our site with the same problem, the answer will also solve his problem. Regardless of the amount of upvotes or accepted answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do agree it would be nice to filter these questions, to be able to find questions I can answer and/or that are worth trying to effort without having my results cluttered with false positives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In response to your comment:** it would be better to give you a view or app that helps you find questions that are worth answering, rather than changing some of the fundamental elements of the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only possible solution I could think off would be to allow mods to edit questions that are older than n-months and have x-answers with y-upvotes (you fill in the blanks). Though I really think we shouldn't mess with voting/accepting, as we have bounties and other elements to encourage this behavior&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2385" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1253" RevisionGUID="14e50dd5-473c-4e14-bf0c-c7659e986bf3" CreationDate="2010-08-11T17:23:22.430" UserId="9666" Comment="Indicated which comment." Text="What is it really you have a problem with? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The fact that these questions pop up as unanswered while they obviously are, so they clutter your search for new questions to answer? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Because really the signal to noise ratio isn't that terrible, especially since I believe most of these questions will be fairly old, so it's not a trend or growing problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Changing the status of these questions however, will have no influence on their usefulness. If it's answered and someone stumbles on our site with the same problem, the answer will also solve his problem. Regardless of the amount of upvotes or accepted answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I do agree it would be nice to filter these questions, to be able to find questions I can answer and/or that are worth trying to effort without having my results cluttered with false positives.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**In response to your first comment:** it would be better to give you a view or app that helps you find questions that are worth answering, rather than changing some of the fundamental elements of the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The only possible solution I could think off would be to allow mods to edit questions that are older than n-months and have x-answers with y-upvotes (you fill in the blanks). Though I really think we shouldn't mess with voting/accepting, as we have bounties and other elements to encourage this behavior&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2386" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1251" RevisionGUID="f1ffe2a0-9e11-4a6c-845e-4281cd190222" CreationDate="2010-08-11T17:37:01.457" UserId="9666" Comment="added 48 characters in body" Text="The **Unanswered** tab at the top shows that there are more than 8,000 unanswered questions, it also seems to increase every day. I think it's a bad behavior that this keeps increasing...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't understand me wrong, I'm not trying to nitpick but I'm trying to get questions answered...  &#xD;&#xA;This tab is the feature I use the most and while it works for new questions, it doesn't work for old ones.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Let's take a look at the oldest question...**&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;[Setting up synergy (multi-computer shared input devices) new to mac][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The user indicates that his question is answered.  &#xD;&#xA;None of the answers have been upvoted and he hasn't accepted a solution either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is an example of an unanswered question that is actually answered,  &#xD;&#xA;and I believe there are a lot more questions that tend to have the same issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**This leads me to several problems/suggestions...**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - I could upvote those questions, but there is a voting cap.  &#xD;&#xA;   Besides the voting cap this would also prevent me from getting the Electorate badge...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Moderators could accept solutions, and 3k and 10k users could vote/flag to accept solutions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Users should have a reminder to improve there question or accept an answer after a time period,  &#xD;&#xA;I suppose there is one but I still see lots of users not accept the final answers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Other cases:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Users that solve their question right after they post it before others do, they leave it unanswered.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just think we should find a solution for this so the history of the unanswered list gets more useful, then it's easier to go through old questions and to find answers for those and maybe even to get awarded for answering those.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: Feel free to add other cases and examples that could fill the unanswered list...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/97687/setting-up-synergy-multi-computer-shared-input-devices-new-to-mac" />
  <row Id="2387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1254" RevisionGUID="893cb974-606a-4321-a14d-e30051c1b5c5" CreationDate="2010-08-11T21:58:38.330" UserId="36565" Text="Trying to view the timeline for http://superuser.com/questions/120241/thunderbird-3-reply-to-all-also-replies-to-myself using the URI http://superuser.com/posts/120241/timeline fails with `Oops! Something Bad Happened!`. This doesn't happen with all questions, just this one." />
  <row Id="2388" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1254" RevisionGUID="893cb974-606a-4321-a14d-e30051c1b5c5" CreationDate="2010-08-11T21:58:38.330" UserId="36565" Text="Timeline broken" />
  <row Id="2389" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1254" RevisionGUID="893cb974-606a-4321-a14d-e30051c1b5c5" CreationDate="2010-08-11T21:58:38.330" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="2390" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1255" RevisionGUID="b4422504-75eb-48d5-9d29-72b3a9144f65" CreationDate="2010-08-12T01:33:19.100" UserId="9666" Text="The meta site shows the reputation of the parent site Super User at the top.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The activity of this meta sites shows I have earned reputation, are these added to the parent site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would allow one to get reputation past the daily reputation cap, is that the right behavior?" />
  <row Id="2391" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1255" RevisionGUID="b4422504-75eb-48d5-9d29-72b3a9144f65" CreationDate="2010-08-12T01:33:19.100" UserId="9666" Text="How does the reputation on parent and on meta site work?" />
  <row Id="2392" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1255" RevisionGUID="b4422504-75eb-48d5-9d29-72b3a9144f65" CreationDate="2010-08-12T01:33:19.100" UserId="9666" Text="&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="2393" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="23539b25-7d72-46e4-8339-a1aa740c4c6e" CreationDate="2010-08-12T03:08:59.337" UserId="40668" Text="Why answers or questions are converted to &quot;Community wiki&quot;? as one of my answer and one question are changed to Community Wiki." />
  <row Id="2394" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="23539b25-7d72-46e4-8339-a1aa740c4c6e" CreationDate="2010-08-12T03:08:59.337" UserId="40668" Text="Why answers or questions are converted to &quot;Community wiki&quot;?" />
  <row Id="2395" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1256" RevisionGUID="23539b25-7d72-46e4-8339-a1aa740c4c6e" CreationDate="2010-08-12T03:08:59.337" UserId="40668" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;&lt;faq-update-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2396" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1257" RevisionGUID="1f7f68c3-4d2a-4468-aa45-8f2b67726888" CreationDate="2010-08-12T03:27:27.540" UserId="1339" Text="Any question or answer edited a sufficient amount of times is automatically turned into a Community Wiki - meaning that the question or answer is now owned by the Community so the originator will no longer receive reputation points (up or down) from that answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A question and all it's answers will also turn to Community Wiki if there are too many answers. This is partly to discourage the influx of reputation caused by more vague or list style type questions. (eg. [Terminal Tips for Mac OS X](http://superuser.com/questions/52483/terminal-tips-and-tricks-for-mac-os-x))&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Community Wiki posts are there to help encourage users to edit and update the answers on the Stack Exchange site to keep it relevant and accurate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For more of the nitty gritty details (including the number of times items need to be edited) check out the Community Wiki FAQ on meta.stackoverflow.com: [What are &quot;Community Wiki&quot; posts?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11740/what-are-community-wiki-posts)" />
  <row Id="2397" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1258" RevisionGUID="570c38da-5fce-4f88-89d3-0c3d6e2d1d3d" CreationDate="2010-08-12T03:32:22.117" UserId="1339" Text="On meta.superuser.com (or any meta site with the exception of meta.stackoverflow.com) you don't actually gain or lose any reputation. Your reputation score is tied to the parent site and up or downvotes on the meta site have no bearing on your reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &gt; **Reputation is always inherited from the parent site.** You cannot gain or lose reputation* on the per-site meta. This also means that some reputation related functions like the rep graph and bounties are not enabled on the per-site meta.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Source: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/07/new-per-site-metas/" />
  <row Id="2398" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1255" RevisionGUID="1b5e40d4-8a00-4e17-a771-0db5f8c45391" CreationDate="2010-08-12T09:32:54.680" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;" />
  <row Id="2399" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1259" RevisionGUID="2f9c5799-4571-4fc3-88e1-8a48218ee606" CreationDate="2010-08-12T09:33:41.360" UserId="1" Text="problem with ad server, now resolved." />
  <row Id="2400" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1243" RevisionGUID="1db17b4e-c951-4a26-bf8d-cadae06a6169" CreationDate="2010-08-12T09:33:47.087" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;" />
  <row Id="2401" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1255" RevisionGUID="9b07b646-ed5e-441c-bb45-18ca7384626b" CreationDate="2010-08-12T11:29:13.317" UserId="9666" Comment="Fixed a small typo." Text="The meta site shows the reputation of the parent site Super User at the top.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The activity of this meta site shows I have earned reputation, are these added to the parent site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This would allow one to get reputation past the daily reputation cap, is that the right behavior?" />
  <row Id="2402" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1251" RevisionGUID="c956a1b7-0e38-4734-a660-4082c6611750" CreationDate="2010-08-12T11:32:58.563" UserId="9666" Comment="Added a tag." Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;unanswered&gt;" />
  <row Id="2403" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1254" RevisionGUID="fe156429-2f2e-4564-ab8d-f1ee2c12ccd7" CreationDate="2010-08-12T21:59:46.577" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;" />
  <row Id="2404" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1260" RevisionGUID="7933a36e-6bfe-43d3-acc2-e7753a7a7d00" CreationDate="2010-08-12T21:59:54.970" UserId="1" Text="OK, we have a fix for this checked in." />
  <row Id="2405" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1244" RevisionGUID="095ea68d-5bdd-4c1b-83f8-f198cf474d74" CreationDate="2010-08-14T03:46:03.670" UserId="307" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2406" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1261" RevisionGUID="a6bdca44-94f5-42ff-b824-33b47543702b" CreationDate="2010-08-14T18:37:59.820" UserId="36565" Text="Should questions about a specific version of something have both the general tag of it and the version tag, or just the version tag? For example: If my question is about Windows XP, do I tag it [[windows]]+[[windows-xp]], or just [[windows-xp]]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [windows]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows&#xD;&#xA;  [windows-xp]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows-xp" />
  <row Id="2407" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1261" RevisionGUID="a6bdca44-94f5-42ff-b824-33b47543702b" CreationDate="2010-08-14T18:37:59.820" UserId="36565" Text="tag + version, or just tag-version?" />
  <row Id="2408" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1261" RevisionGUID="a6bdca44-94f5-42ff-b824-33b47543702b" CreationDate="2010-08-14T18:37:59.820" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="2409" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1262" RevisionGUID="fbc60896-51d2-4a1d-81ac-10249ef34d43" CreationDate="2010-08-14T20:47:09.093" UserId="4377" Text="If the question is about a specific version, then it should be just the version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2410" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1261" RevisionGUID="d42f196b-8664-4de1-8a63-125fbeca3a8f" CreationDate="2010-08-14T23:34:46.437" UserId="36565" Comment="added 270 characters in body" Text="Should questions about a specific version of something have both the general tag of it and the version tag, or just the version tag? For example: If I'm asking &quot;How do the Home and Professional versions of Windows XP differ?&quot;, do I tag it [[windows]]+[[windows-xp]], or just [[windows-xp]]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about regular questions about Windows, i.e. If I have a certain version of Windows, but my question isn't specifically about that version, for example: &quot;I need sound editing software for Windows. I'm on Windows XP.&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [windows]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows&#xD;&#xA;  [windows-xp]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows-xp" />
  <row Id="2411" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1263" RevisionGUID="93bebb05-e2ed-4dcc-83c6-b805fc31ed8a" CreationDate="2010-08-15T11:39:02.407" UserId="13567" Text="It is 14:24 here. When I was last on Superuser around 10 hours ago, my reputation was 9147 but now it is 8788. The problem is, yesterday some person gave me votes on my questions excessively and when I checked my reputation window, I saw that there are lots of consecutive votes on my questions one coming after another. As far as I remember, the total points were 160 and I thought that the system would automatically take those points back, but now I see that I've lost more than 160 points because of someone I don't know who apparently is voting excessively for probably getting the &quot;Electorate&quot; badge. According to my calculation, I lost 199 reps because of him and I need this to be corrected.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As far as I understand, in this specific case the system is punishing me as it thinks as if I gave myself votes using a sockpuppet account; but I'm the victim here." />
  <row Id="2412" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1263" RevisionGUID="93bebb05-e2ed-4dcc-83c6-b805fc31ed8a" CreationDate="2010-08-15T11:39:02.407" UserId="13567" Text="Someone caused me to lose reputation with excessive voting on my questions" />
  <row Id="2413" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1263" RevisionGUID="93bebb05-e2ed-4dcc-83c6-b805fc31ed8a" CreationDate="2010-08-15T11:39:02.407" UserId="13567" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;&lt;voting&gt;" />
  <row Id="2414" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1264" RevisionGUID="5d06f825-7209-43f6-8bed-9b60814ef209" CreationDate="2010-08-15T12:30:48.860" UserId="39366" Text="This is probably not a punishment against you, but just a recalc of your reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visit http://superuser.com/reputation when logged in to see your full (and *accurate*) rep report (although that won't help *now*, after a recalc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some posts to check on the primary meta:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [What can cause Actual rep to differ from Shown rep?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/49467/what-can-cause-actual-rep-to-differ-from-shown-rep)&#xD;&#xA;* [Why would I lose rep overnight - could it be related to multiple upvotes from a colleague?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/56853/why-would-i-lose-rep-overnight-could-it-be-related-to-multiple-upvotes-from-a-c)&#xD;&#xA;* [rep-recalc tag](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/rep-recalc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Short Explaination&#xD;&#xA;Over time, your visible rep score begins to differ from what it should be. Some actions don't reverse their rep changes instantly - for example I know when I was a relatively new user I downvoted someone and then they deleted their answer, this was my first down-vote so I was paying it more attention than usual so had noticed the post was gone, but also that I did not get my 1 rep point back - but http://superuser.com/reputation scored me 1 point higher than the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Personal example:** At this moment I seem to have 7rep too much (1271 on site, 1264 on rep sheet). I would *guess* this is from 3 down-votes I've made on things now deleted (I know at least 2 things I've downvoted before were deleted) and maybe an up-vote on something else that has now been deleted. If/when I get a recalc, I will loose those 7 rep." />
  <row Id="2415" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1265" RevisionGUID="e704120b-07f6-4e5e-9b27-7619174693dd" CreationDate="2010-08-15T14:02:00.327" UserId="34844" Text="I always remove the &quot;windows&quot; tag if a question is tagged with &quot;windows&quot; AND &quot;windows-xp&quot;. &quot;windows-xp&quot; already makes clear it's about windows. Otherwise, if there's a question about Windows XP Home, you should tag it as. &quot;windows&quot; + &quot;windows-xp&quot; + &quot;windows-xp-home&quot; Which causes for two redundant tags in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if a question is not about a specific question, I'd tag it as &quot;windows&quot; only." />
  <row Id="2416" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1266" RevisionGUID="35cf3f86-7197-4b5d-ba73-5340ff17306f" CreationDate="2010-08-15T20:56:29.280" UserId="34844" Text="I know about the superuser.com/reputation feature, but is there a native version of this feature I can use to do the same check on other users? " />
  <row Id="2417" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1266" RevisionGUID="35cf3f86-7197-4b5d-ba73-5340ff17306f" CreationDate="2010-08-15T20:56:29.280" UserId="34844" Text="/reputation for other users" />
  <row Id="2418" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1266" RevisionGUID="35cf3f86-7197-4b5d-ba73-5340ff17306f" CreationDate="2010-08-15T20:56:29.280" UserId="34844" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="2419" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1267" RevisionGUID="84ed032c-e178-4fb4-b50c-a0410189f655" CreationDate="2010-08-15T21:15:21.247" UserId="4377" Text="AFAIK, there is no such tool. Maybe you could recreate the rep from the data dump ? " />
  <row Id="2420" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1268" RevisionGUID="90c81206-e862-435e-8f13-95d6b32f16e0" CreationDate="2010-08-15T21:20:36.030" UserId="3981" Text="**No**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not even moderators have the ability to see the reputation audit. " />
  <row Id="2421" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1269" RevisionGUID="4e4d2c2f-074a-41ae-b4e9-78de5e0cd1cf" CreationDate="2010-08-15T21:31:22.970" UserId="307" Text="When the automatic reputation recalc happens, it takes away all of the invalid votes from that other user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not only that, it will then run through the entire audit and work out your new correct reputation score.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Keep in mind, any questions since deleted between when you last had your recalc and now will not be included.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At the end of last month, many off-topic, subjective/argumentative, migrated out and duplicate questions were cleaned up as part of regular housekeeping. Most of that means deletion, merging in the case of duplicates.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Your new reputation is far lower than you expected now because of deleted questions/answers you've posted to are no longer &quot;there&quot; to account the reputation for. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is why you've noticed a far larger drop than the flurry of votes being corrected for." />
  <row Id="2422" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1270" RevisionGUID="f5ff2467-1e20-44bd-8684-7113e712c4f1" CreationDate="2010-08-15T21:43:54.337" UserId="34844" Text="I was wondering, what is it exactly that moderators do besides closing and removing questions. I know they moderate comments and such if they break the rules, but what else? And &gt;10k users are supposed to be nearly as &quot;powerful&quot; as moderators, what's the difference there?" />
  <row Id="2423" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1270" RevisionGUID="f5ff2467-1e20-44bd-8684-7113e712c4f1" CreationDate="2010-08-15T21:43:54.337" UserId="34844" Text="What can moderators do and what's difference between 10k users and moderators?" />
  <row Id="2424" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1270" RevisionGUID="f5ff2467-1e20-44bd-8684-7113e712c4f1" CreationDate="2010-08-15T21:43:54.337" UserId="34844" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;moderator&gt;" />
  <row Id="2425" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1271" RevisionGUID="2c6d2c9e-d4d7-4861-9e58-17d9197942e6" CreationDate="2010-08-15T21:49:49.157" UserId="289" Text="Moderators have an extra page where flagged posts, comments show up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There's also a page to merge questions, users and tags. They can also set up a message that appears between the title and the content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moderators can also see deleted questions and answers on people's profile pages." />
  <row Id="2426" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1272" RevisionGUID="6f88bb91-cfef-4875-8abc-f7b800d79f04" CreationDate="2010-08-15T21:55:24.820" UserId="3981" Text="The abilities available to 10K users are documented fairly well on MSO [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/4565/what-facilities-are-there-in-the-moderation-tools/4576#4576). The major difference between 10K users and Moderators are that moderators have binding votes, therefore there is no 5 user vote rule in place. Furthermore the function moderators can perform is describe on the blog [here](http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/05/a-theory-of-moderation/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moderators can also suspend users, do mass retags, and view and deal with spam users and posts. There is also some other lightning bolts available to moderators which aren't publicly mentioned since... Well where would the fun in that be?" />
  <row Id="2427" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1272" RevisionGUID="ff256835-7d2d-4ce8-8982-64e03bb89966" CreationDate="2010-08-15T22:05:42.277" UserId="3981" Comment="added 319 characters in body; added 38 characters in body" Text="The abilities available to 10K users are documented fairly well on MSO [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/4565/what-facilities-are-there-in-the-moderation-tools/4576#4576). The major difference between 10K users and Moderators are that moderators have binding votes, therefore there is no 5 user vote rule in place. Furthermore the function moderators can perform is describe on the blog [here](http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/05/a-theory-of-moderation/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moderators can also suspend users, do mass retags, and view and deal with spam users and posts including locking posts, merging posts, converting posts to CW and deleting posts instantly. The same with users where we can merge or destroy user accounts. Lastly there is small abilities like removing bounties to migrate questions and recalculate user reputation scores. We can also delete and edit comments. Oh, and lastly we can set system messages.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is also some other lightning bolts available to moderators which aren't publicly mentioned since... Well where would the fun in that be?" />
  <row Id="2428" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1265" RevisionGUID="99f1e9aa-749e-4058-9731-3e9bbbb36807" CreationDate="2010-08-16T00:03:29.690" UserId="34844" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="I always remove the &quot;windows&quot; tag if a question is tagged with &quot;windows&quot; AND &quot;windows-xp&quot;. &quot;windows-xp&quot; already makes clear it's about windows. Otherwise, if there's a question about Windows XP Home, you should tag it as. &quot;windows&quot; + &quot;windows-xp&quot; + &quot;windows-xp-home&quot; Which causes for two redundant tags in my opinion.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;if a question is not about a specific version, I'd tag it as &quot;windows&quot; only." />
  <row Id="2429" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1264" RevisionGUID="81657933-2d91-4435-bb98-3f4ab72ec5c0" CreationDate="2010-08-16T14:50:01.280" UserId="39366" Comment="spelling fix" Text="This is probably not a punishment against you, but just a recalc of your reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Visit http://superuser.com/reputation when logged in to see your full (and *accurate*) rep report (although that won't help *now*, after a recalc).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some posts to check on the primary meta:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* [What can cause Actual rep to differ from Shown rep?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/49467/what-can-cause-actual-rep-to-differ-from-shown-rep)&#xD;&#xA;* [Why would I lose rep overnight - could it be related to multiple upvotes from a colleague?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/56853/why-would-i-lose-rep-overnight-could-it-be-related-to-multiple-upvotes-from-a-c)&#xD;&#xA;* [rep-recalc tag](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/rep-recalc)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Short Explaination&#xD;&#xA;Over time, your visible rep score begins to differ from what it should be. Some actions don't reverse their rep changes instantly - for example I know when I was a relatively new user I downvoted someone and then they deleted their answer, this was my first down-vote so I was paying it more attention than usual so had noticed the post was gone, but also that I did not get my 1 rep point back - but http://superuser.com/reputation scored me 1 point higher than the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Personal example:** At this moment I seem to have 7rep too much (1271 on site, 1264 on rep sheet). I would *guess* this is from 3 down-votes I've made on things now deleted (I know at least 2 things I've downvoted before were deleted) and an up-vote on something else that has now been deleted. If/when I get a recalc, I will lose those 7 rep." />
  <row Id="2430" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1261" RevisionGUID="f7039944-31a9-459a-8c74-78216e83f450" CreationDate="2010-08-16T15:24:00.517" UserId="36565" Comment="edited title" Text="tag + tag-version, or just tag-version?" />
  <row Id="2431" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1273" RevisionGUID="f1b29a39-58c8-4f92-a02c-f2976d64343a" CreationDate="2010-08-16T16:51:03.800" UserId="36565" Text="[[command-line]] probably is/should be the canonical tag, with 782 questions. [[cmd]] is more Windows-oriented, but is still [[command-line]]. [[cli]] is about half-and-half, with half on Windows and half on Linux. Anyways, I propose that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[[cmd]] and [[cli]] are retagged into [[command-line]].**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[command-line]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/command-line&#xD;&#xA;[cmd]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/cmd&#xD;&#xA;[cli]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/cli" />
  <row Id="2432" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1273" RevisionGUID="f1b29a39-58c8-4f92-a02c-f2976d64343a" CreationDate="2010-08-16T16:51:03.800" UserId="36565" Text="Retag cmd and cli into command-line" />
  <row Id="2433" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1273" RevisionGUID="f1b29a39-58c8-4f92-a02c-f2976d64343a" CreationDate="2010-08-16T16:51:03.800" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2434" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1274" RevisionGUID="30819ecd-0662-43e5-816c-8d4883491888" CreationDate="2010-08-16T17:17:55.410" UserId="34844" Text="I think that would be a very good idea. cmd and cli are both command-line interfaces so merging them to command-line shouldn't be a problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The difference between Windows and Linux should be made by its accompanying tags... " />
  <row Id="2435" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1275" RevisionGUID="02603ed3-0a52-454d-a44e-18ae919739f9" CreationDate="2010-08-16T18:09:10.607" UserId="42084" Text="When I try to change my avatar by clicking &quot;Change Picture&quot; under my profile, I am taken to www.gravatar.com.  But I have an myOpenId account with an option to change my profile picture.  Which one actually changes my avatar?&lt;br&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Side Note:&lt;/b&gt; When I tried changing my avatar in my myOpenId preferences, nothing changes on my Stack Exchange accounts.  When I tried gravatar.com, nothing happens &lt;i&gt;except&lt;/i&gt; when I click &quot;accounts&quot; tab under my profile, under the &quot;related accounts&quot; all the avatars have changed to the one I wanted but have not changed on the actually sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Side Note 2:&lt;/b&gt; No matter what I try, my avatar is stuck on that e-mail hash code image creator.  Could it be a conflict between myOpenId and Gravatar.com?" />
  <row Id="2436" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1275" RevisionGUID="02603ed3-0a52-454d-a44e-18ae919739f9" CreationDate="2010-08-16T18:09:10.607" UserId="42084" Text="Changing Avatar trouble" />
  <row Id="2437" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1275" RevisionGUID="02603ed3-0a52-454d-a44e-18ae919739f9" CreationDate="2010-08-16T18:09:10.607" UserId="42084" Text="&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="2438" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1276" RevisionGUID="cba01b0e-0368-4fd4-9a94-28409715db59" CreationDate="2010-08-16T18:26:01.690" UserId="34844" Text="Pictures from Gravatar are used. It might take some time for changes to take effect. Currently, you're displaying the Super Mario ghost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Boo! I'm a ghost!](http://i.imgur.com/r5oYN.png &quot;Boo! I'm a ghost!&quot;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You might even want to clear your browser's cache." />
  <row Id="2439" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1277" RevisionGUID="7ae762e4-dd89-432f-9a8c-3895b02998aa" CreationDate="2010-08-16T18:47:12.717" UserId="36601" Text="I generally agree, but what about cases where problem is related to CMD.EXE itself and not any other shells on Windows? Maybe those should have separate tag." />
  <row Id="2440" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1278" RevisionGUID="b92e6cca-9be2-450d-9a6a-acfe721c5cac" CreationDate="2010-08-16T18:55:31.027" UserId="2855" Text="cli can refer to more than just Windows and Linux command line interfaces though. A lot of networking gear is all cli (Cisco IOS, ExtremeOS, JunOS, etc). I know that most of that will pop up on SF rather than SU, though it doesn't hurt to be prepared. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think cmd is appropriate for Windows, terminal is appropriate for Linux and cli is still applicable in both cases, as well as others." />
  <row Id="2441" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1275" RevisionGUID="a4b31cd5-c3d4-4255-81bd-cd2a0a72f399" CreationDate="2010-08-16T19:51:50.337" UserId="820" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;user-profiles&gt;&lt;gravatar&gt;" />
  <row Id="2442" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1273" RevisionGUID="51f8cd54-ef9f-4235-8255-a9770ee6c3d9" CreationDate="2010-08-16T23:43:57.237" UserId="36565" Comment="added 241 characters in body; edited title" Text="[[command-line]] probably is/should be the canonical tag, with 782 questions. [[cmd]] is more Windows-oriented, but is still [[command-line]]. [[cli]] is about half-and-half, with half on Windows and half on Linux. [[terminal]] is about half OSX and half Linux, and [[terminal.app]] is mostly (95%) OSX. I propose that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[[cmd]], [[cli]], [[terminal]], and [[terminal.app]] are retagged into [[command-line]].**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[command-line]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/command-line&#xD;&#xA;[cmd]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/cmd&#xD;&#xA;[cli]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/cli&#xD;&#xA;[terminal]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/terminal&#xD;&#xA;[terminal.app]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/terminal.app" />
  <row Id="2443" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1273" RevisionGUID="51f8cd54-ef9f-4235-8255-a9770ee6c3d9" CreationDate="2010-08-16T23:43:57.237" UserId="36565" Comment="added 241 characters in body; edited title" Text="Retag cmd, cli, terminal, and terminal.app into command-line" />
  <row Id="2444" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1273" RevisionGUID="844ae3a8-0236-4c33-b0e7-54a7f3fffe66" CreationDate="2010-08-17T05:12:47.087" UserId="1339" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="[[command-line]] probably is/should be the canonical tag, with 782 questions. [[cmd]] is more Windows-oriented, but is still [[command-line]]. [[cli]] is about half-and-half, with half on Windows and half on Linux. [[terminal]] is about half OS X and half Linux, and [[terminal.app]] is mostly (95%) OS X. I propose that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[[cmd]], [[cli]], [[terminal]], and [[terminal.app]] are retagged into [[command-line]].**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[command-line]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/command-line&#xD;&#xA;[cmd]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/cmd&#xD;&#xA;[cli]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/cli&#xD;&#xA;[terminal]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/terminal&#xD;&#xA;[terminal.app]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/terminal.app" />
  <row Id="2445" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1279" RevisionGUID="301a2284-e51f-457a-a182-8fbd81c364dd" CreationDate="2010-08-17T05:13:42.907" UserId="1339" Text="I don't believe `terminal.app` should be retagged as well: Terminal.app refers specifically to Apple's Terminal application part of Mac OS X - a bit of overlap but most questions I've seen tagged terminal.app have to do with settings with the program and less with the command line. If it's to do with the command line and not about the application itself it should be tagged `command-line` and not `terminal.app`" />
  <row Id="2446" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1280" RevisionGUID="bd92ecb3-d170-4e54-9934-ddcb7cd6edf8" CreationDate="2010-08-17T15:19:16.080" UserId="820" Text="I agree with *cli-&gt;command-line*, however I still think there are questions where **cmd** or **terminal/terminal.app** are valid and useful tags.  Situations where questions deal with the specific terminal/console application should have their own tag." />
  <row Id="2447" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1273" RevisionGUID="925c4ab1-4a07-4fee-9942-67e6f33d849f" CreationDate="2010-08-18T19:32:32.983" UserId="36565" Comment="added 250 characters in body" Text="[[command-line]] probably is/should be the canonical tag, with 782 questions. [[cmd]] is more Windows-oriented, but is still [[command-line]]. [[cli]] is about half-and-half, with half on Windows and half on Linux. [[terminal]] is about half OS X and half Linux, and [[terminal.app]] is mostly (95%) OS X. I propose that:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[[cmd]], [[cli]], [[terminal]], and [[terminal.app]] are retagged into [[command-line]].**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Alternatively, reading a couple of the answers here, we could:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**retag [[cmd]]/[[terminal.app]]-specific questions to temporary tags, mass retag all the others into [[command-line]], then mass retag [[cmd]] and [[terminal.app]] questions back.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[command-line]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/command-line&#xD;&#xA;[cmd]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/cmd&#xD;&#xA;[cli]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/cli&#xD;&#xA;[terminal]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/terminal&#xD;&#xA;[terminal.app]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/terminal.app" />
  <row Id="2473" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1286" RevisionGUID="040b50e5-e683-46a0-999c-bb31bf484920" CreationDate="2010-08-19T08:43:45.077" UserId="20088" Text="Is there a way to hide the anniversary celebratory notice? I'm super excited for SuperUser's birthday, and was really happy to see that, but now that I know, it's a little bit distracting having it up there everywhere I go.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;P.s. Happy Birthday SuperUser! ;)" />
  <row Id="2474" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1286" RevisionGUID="040b50e5-e683-46a0-999c-bb31bf484920" CreationDate="2010-08-19T08:43:45.077" UserId="20088" Text="Hide anniversary notice bar" />
  <row Id="2475" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1286" RevisionGUID="040b50e5-e683-46a0-999c-bb31bf484920" CreationDate="2010-08-19T08:43:45.077" UserId="20088" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2476" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1287" RevisionGUID="a8255fa1-551b-4bd2-a83b-b44321d4adb6" CreationDate="2010-08-19T10:49:36.830" UserId="25472" Text="Use a [user script](http://files.whitequark.org/hide-anniversary.user.js)?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    // ==UserScript==&#xD;&#xA;    // @name      Hide the anniversary bar on SuperUser&#xD;&#xA;    // @namespace http://whitequark.org/greasemonkey&#xD;&#xA;    // @include   http://superuser.com/*&#xD;&#xA;    // ==/UserScript==&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    var bar = document.getElementById('system-message');&#xD;&#xA;    if(bar.textContent.indexOf('anniversary') != -1)&#xD;&#xA;      bar.parentNode.removeChild(bar);" />
  <row Id="2477" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1288" RevisionGUID="dcfef296-0fad-495f-bc04-603ab75806ad" CreationDate="2010-08-19T11:36:32.323" UserId="1" Text="We *could* insert it as a message in everyone's message queue so it would be dismissable.. but the 90% of traffic that is anonymous (unregistered, no account) users would never see it then." />
  <row Id="2478" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1289" RevisionGUID="b22c00c3-4feb-40a9-aff9-f8fa7b568025" CreationDate="2010-08-20T11:31:11.830" UserId="46353" Text="Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Dreamboxes][1] are Linux-powered TV receivers. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it ok to ask questions about them on SU? If not, where should I post them?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreambox" />
  <row Id="2479" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1289" RevisionGUID="b22c00c3-4feb-40a9-aff9-f8fa7b568025" CreationDate="2010-08-20T11:31:11.830" UserId="46353" Text="Is it ok to post questions about Dreamboxes on SU?" />
  <row Id="2480" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1289" RevisionGUID="b22c00c3-4feb-40a9-aff9-f8fa7b568025" CreationDate="2010-08-20T11:31:11.830" UserId="46353" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;" />
  <row Id="2481" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1290" RevisionGUID="5c6df1db-6940-4d41-bf67-f741241800d7" CreationDate="2010-08-20T12:10:30.883" UserId="4377" Text="Questions on Dreamboxes would be closed on SU for being off-topic, since Dreamboxes are&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; a series of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Linux-powered DVB satellite,&#xD;&#xA;&gt; terrestrial and cable digital&#xD;&#xA;&gt; television receivers (set-top box)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You could ask questions about them on [Gadgets.Stackexchange][1] I guess&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://gadgets.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="2482" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1291" RevisionGUID="d7fab4bd-6469-49fb-a770-8193c046177b" CreationDate="2010-08-20T15:36:38.277" UserId="34844" Text="I agree with Sathya, except for one thing. Dreamboxes run on a lightweight version of Linux and therefore, problems that directly concern that part of the Dreambox would fall under computer software, since this could help others that have similar questions about a linux system." />
  <row Id="2483" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1291" RevisionGUID="da8de051-4d8a-42dd-b56e-9081539ccd6a" CreationDate="2010-08-20T16:13:18.793" UserId="34844" Comment="added 46 characters in body" Text="I agree with Sathya, except for one thing. Dreamboxes run on a lightweight version of Linux and therefore, problems that directly concern that part of the Dreambox would fall under computer software, since this could help others that have similar questions about a linux system. If it's just about normal linux operations..." />
  <row Id="2484" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1292" RevisionGUID="c00ddd2c-5e53-4a65-882f-6e53fb20176d" CreationDate="2010-08-20T19:59:36.083" UserId="14515" Text="Wordpress is technically computer software, but it is also programming and development. So where should I ask a question about a WP plugin on SO or SU?" />
  <row Id="2485" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1292" RevisionGUID="c00ddd2c-5e53-4a65-882f-6e53fb20176d" CreationDate="2010-08-20T19:59:36.083" UserId="14515" Text="where to ask about website CMS, like wordpress SU or SO?" />
  <row Id="2486" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1292" RevisionGUID="c00ddd2c-5e53-4a65-882f-6e53fb20176d" CreationDate="2010-08-20T19:59:36.083" UserId="14515" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;support&gt;&lt;off-topic&gt;" />
  <row Id="2487" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1293" RevisionGUID="46f61c39-ed1e-4460-b3fa-3d5333aae7d4" CreationDate="2010-08-20T20:23:55.943" UserId="4377" Text="Questions on what WP plugin to use, how to install the plugin would go to [ProWebmasters StackExchange][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions on how to program or debug a plugin would goto [StackOverflow][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question doesn't fit on SU as the SU FAQ clearly mentions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; it is not about …&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  - websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and **WordPress**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com" />
  <row Id="2488" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1294" RevisionGUID="8a313518-60d6-4fd5-86a1-16b6b01693ac" CreationDate="2010-08-20T21:20:58.663" UserId="9666" Text="As time passes by, some questions and answers are forgotten...  &#xD;&#xA;Those present people with out-dated information that needs to be updated or cleaned up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We should compile up a list with such questions and answers,  &#xD;&#xA;so that people with reputation can improve those questions or mods could clean those up...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     - [Title](Link to question/answer)  &#xD;&#xA;       Reason: Why the question should be improved or cleaned...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a question or answer progresses, we can just add an extra line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;       Status: Rejected/Unclear Reason/Done&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please keep this list in my first answer and discuss this question in the comments. &#xD;&#xA;When needed we could do a more important discussion in a separate answer to this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For those editing:&#xD;&#xA;Remember to always respect the original author and to leave an edit reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2489" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1294" RevisionGUID="8a313518-60d6-4fd5-86a1-16b6b01693ac" CreationDate="2010-08-20T21:20:58.663" UserId="9666" Text="List of questions/answers that need to be improved or cleaned." />
  <row Id="2490" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1294" RevisionGUID="8a313518-60d6-4fd5-86a1-16b6b01693ac" CreationDate="2010-08-20T21:20:58.663" UserId="9666" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;improvement&gt;&lt;list&gt;&lt;outdated&gt;&lt;clean-up&gt;" />
  <row Id="2491" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="7df48021-a0f2-46c3-89d3-be065fa14627" CreationDate="2010-08-20T21:23:36.367" UserId="9666" Text="- [Why is “127.0.0.1 localhost” needed in HOSTS file ?](http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file)  &#xD;&#xA;  Reason: The formatting needs to be improved in the whole page, there is too much in the question." />
  <row Id="2492" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1294" RevisionGUID="cf49a77b-b275-4ebe-8913-ab53b0cb58bc" CreationDate="2010-08-20T21:26:15.520" UserId="9666" Comment="added 91 characters in body" Text="As time passes by, some questions/answers are forgotten...  &#xD;&#xA;Those present people with out-dated information that needs to be updated or cleaned up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also questions/answers with bad formatting or that contain too much irrelevant information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We should compile up a list with such questions and answers,  &#xD;&#xA;so that people with reputation can improve those or mods could clean those up...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     - [Title](Link to question/answer)  &#xD;&#xA;       Reason: Why the question should be improved or cleaned...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a question or answer progresses, we can just add an extra line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;       Status: Rejected/Unclear Reason/Done&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please keep this list in my first answer and discuss this question in the comments. &#xD;&#xA;When needed we could do a more important discussion in a separate answer to this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For those editing:&#xD;&#xA;Remember to always respect the original author and to leave an edit reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2493" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1294" RevisionGUID="cf49a77b-b275-4ebe-8913-ab53b0cb58bc" CreationDate="2010-08-20T21:26:37.753" UserId="9666" />
  <row Id="2494" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="cd46633b-2d9f-4a4e-ba7a-997cd5d8c7b1" CreationDate="2010-08-20T21:30:30.983" UserId="9666" Comment="added 156 characters in body" Text=" - [Why is “127.0.0.1 localhost” needed in HOSTS file ?](http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved in the whole page, there is too much in the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [IE 8 Issues](http://superuser.com/questions/1069)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: From the first sight it's unclear what the question is about, should be clarified." />
  <row Id="2495" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="488a1c7d-862e-45ac-8ac9-e99d22fb0a76" CreationDate="2010-08-20T21:37:09.480" UserId="9666" Comment="added 186 characters in body; added 126 characters in body" Text=" - [What to do with old hard drives](http://superuser.com/questions/36340/what-to-do-with-old-hard-drives)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved, is the bold part needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Why is “127.0.0.1 localhost” needed in HOSTS file ?](http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved in the whole page, there is too much in the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Programmer Desk](http://superuser.com/questions/11391/programmer-desk)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting could be improved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [IE 8 Issues](http://superuser.com/questions/1069)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: From the first sight it's unclear what the question is about, should be clarified." />
  <row Id="2496" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="92cfa332-1fef-4aa7-a281-b49c1b3e5853" CreationDate="2010-08-20T21:47:36.307" UserId="9666" Comment="added 171 characters in body" Text=" - [What to do with old hard drives](http://superuser.com/questions/36340/what-to-do-with-old-hard-drives)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved, is the bold part needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Why is “127.0.0.1 localhost” needed in HOSTS file ?](http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved in the whole page, there is too much in the question.&#xD;&#xA;   Status: An [answer][1] still contains too much bold...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Programmer Desk](http://superuser.com/questions/11391/programmer-desk)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting could be improved.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [IE 8 Issues](http://superuser.com/questions/1069)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: From the first sight it's unclear what the question is about, should be clarified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file/178406#178406" />
  <row Id="2497" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1294" RevisionGUID="3bf1559a-bafe-4fdb-bed3-ea4858061b42" CreationDate="2010-08-20T21:50:06.080" UserId="9666" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="As time passes by, some questions/answers are forgotten...  &#xD;&#xA;Those present people with out-dated information that needs to be updated or cleaned up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also questions/answers with bad formatting or that contain too much irrelevant information.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We should compile up a list with such questions and answers,  &#xD;&#xA;so that people with reputation can improve those or mods could clean those up...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     - [Title](Link to question/answer)  &#xD;&#xA;       Reason: Why the question should be improved or cleaned...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a question or answer progresses, we can just add an extra line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;       Status: Rejected/Unclear Reason/*Done*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please keep this list in my first answer and discuss this question in the comments. &#xD;&#xA;When needed we could do a more important discussion in a separate answer to this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For those editing:&#xD;&#xA;Remember to always respect the original author and to leave an edit reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2498" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="cdaedb01-0d98-4adf-a30d-c5613f0340be" CreationDate="2010-08-20T22:55:15.723" UserId="4377" Comment="deleted 49 characters in body" Text=" - [What to do with old hard drives](http://superuser.com/questions/36340/what-to-do-with-old-hard-drives)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved, is the bold part needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Why is “127.0.0.1 localhost” needed in HOSTS file ?](http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved in the whole page, there is too much in the question.&#xD;&#xA;   Status: Done.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Programmer Desk](http://superuser.com/questions/11391/programmer-desk)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: Offtopic, voted to close.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [IE 8 Issues](http://superuser.com/questions/1069)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: From the first sight it's unclear what the question is about, should be clarified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file/178406#178406" />
  <row Id="2499" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1296" RevisionGUID="77c8dd15-7d1b-47ab-a4e6-3b9f3c7052d9" CreationDate="2010-08-20T23:23:24.663" UserId="7597" Text="There is a new SE site &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/&quot;&gt;dedicated to WordPress&lt;/a&gt;, currently in public beta. I think that, generally speaking, if your question involves WP, that site is the place to go." />
  <row Id="2500" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1294" RevisionGUID="25fdb7dc-d78c-4636-8772-ed1c98f3bf82" CreationDate="2010-08-21T00:00:35.313" UserId="9666" Comment="added 101 characters in body; added 42 characters in body" Text="As time passes by, some questions/answers are forgotten...  &#xD;&#xA;Those present people with out-dated information that needs to be updated or cleaned up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also questions/answers with bad formatting or that contain too much irrelevant information.  &#xD;&#xA;We could, for example, bring consistency in formatting in CW questions to increase readability...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We should compile up a list with such questions and answers which anyone could contribute to,  &#xD;&#xA;so that people with enough reputation can improve those or mods could clean those up...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     - [Title](Link to question/answer)  &#xD;&#xA;       Reason: Why the question should be improved or cleaned...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a question or answer progresses, we can just add an extra line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;       Status: Rejected/Unclear Reason/*Done*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please keep this list in my first answer and discuss this question in the comments.   &#xD;&#xA;When needed we could do a more important discussion in a separate answer to this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For those editing:&#xD;&#xA;Remember to always respect the original author and to leave an edit reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2501" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="42ffb67f-64cf-4ada-aca0-c348763409b0" CreationDate="2010-08-21T00:03:36.880" UserId="9666" Comment="added 20 characters in body" Text=" - [What to do with old hard drives](http://superuser.com/questions/36340/what-to-do-with-old-hard-drives)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved, is the bold part needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Programmer Desk](http://superuser.com/questions/11391/programmer-desk)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: Offtopic, voted to close.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [IE 8 Issues](http://superuser.com/questions/1069)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: From the first sight it's unclear what the question is about, should be clarified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Why is “127.0.0.1 localhost” needed in HOSTS file ?](http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved in the whole page, there is too much in the question.&#xD;&#xA;   Status: **Done**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file/178406#178406" />
  <row Id="2502" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1297" RevisionGUID="d9d5f058-5cfd-4329-82c0-37581ed3f65f" CreationDate="2010-08-21T00:17:14.313" UserId="605" Text="There are a number of exchanges that are stepping all over Super User: Web Applications, Electronic Gadgets (although rumor is that one isn't going to survive, but be replaced by more specific exchanges for Android combined with the Apple exchange), TeX, Unix &amp; Linux, Apple are all in beta. There's not that much left for Super User, except for Windows and hardware.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As it stands, in about a week, a lot of questions will have a dedicated community. Unless Super User takes an approach on Windows (which would be good - there's no Windows exchange beyond a handful of follows) or hardware (another good one - again, no exchanges) and seeks out getting both users and experts in these areas involved, there really isn't a reason to use Super User - it'll be a ghost town.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Honestly, I don't want Super User to just fold up and die unless there's a place to discuss both Windows and personal computer hardware (including home accessories, such as routers, keyboards, mice, etc.). It seems the trend, however, is for more focused exchanges. So how is Super User going to reform itself to address these changes?" />
  <row Id="2503" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1297" RevisionGUID="d9d5f058-5cfd-4329-82c0-37581ed3f65f" CreationDate="2010-08-21T00:17:14.313" UserId="605" Text="Is Super User dying?" />
  <row Id="2504" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1297" RevisionGUID="d9d5f058-5cfd-4329-82c0-37581ed3f65f" CreationDate="2010-08-21T00:17:14.313" UserId="605" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;future&gt;" />
  <row Id="2505" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1298" RevisionGUID="4c2b01c3-afb2-40d5-b240-af89733a7563" CreationDate="2010-08-21T01:59:19.037" UserId="1711" Text="I thought web applications and gadgets were outside of Super Users mandate in the first place. No?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TeX and LaTeX questions were mostly on topic, but frankly more of them were good SO material than were good SU material, and in any case that is a pretty small fraction of all users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the concern is legitimate, but not pressing just now." />
  <row Id="2506" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1299" RevisionGUID="e71f6e78-61ac-47c4-95bb-86e8a870904e" CreationDate="2010-08-21T01:59:51.270" UserId="9666" Text="I wouldn't call it dying, it's impossible that there will be enough exchanges in the near future to overlap everything on Super User. Look through the first three pages of [tags][1]... It would take quite some exchanges to cover all these, so as for completely dying? Not now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Intermezzo: Please note that the sites have 90 days to proof that they are worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what might really happen to Super User then? We would probably change to a more general than specific focus, questions that overlap multiple exchanges would thus belong on Super User. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just an example question that has no specific exchange: How many songs will fit in 1 GB?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This leaves us with: &quot;What about the increasing amount of questions that will need migration?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks like a bad idea to migrate and close more questions than usual...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/tags" />
  <row Id="2507" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1298" RevisionGUID="c458b037-994a-4562-a820-5530e0a62930" CreationDate="2010-08-21T02:28:18.733" UserId="1711" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="I thought web applications and gadgets were outside of Super User's mandate in the first place. No?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;TeX and LaTeX questions were mostly on topic, but frankly more of them were good SO material than were good SU material, and in any case that is a pretty small fraction of all users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think the concern is legitimate, but not pressing just now." />
  <row Id="2508" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="8c59b07e-ba3c-4690-b6e5-139eef5aa5d0" CreationDate="2010-08-21T07:33:52.857" UserId="1339" Comment="Update per vgv8's wonderful edit." Text=" - [What to do with old hard drives](http://superuser.com/questions/36340/what-to-do-with-old-hard-drives)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved, is the bold part needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Programmer Desk](http://superuser.com/questions/11391/programmer-desk)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: Offtopic, voted to close.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [IE 8 Issues](http://superuser.com/questions/1069)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: From the first sight it's unclear what the question is about, should be clarified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Why is “127.0.0.1 localhost” needed in HOSTS file ?](http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved in the whole page, there is too much in the question.&#xD;&#xA;   Status: Had been cleaned up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file/178406#178406" />
  <row Id="2509" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1300" RevisionGUID="de13e1d0-835b-4d63-8373-77caf1ab093b" CreationDate="2010-08-21T10:39:58.747" UserId="39366" Text="Remember it's not just the *topic* that matters but the *community*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even where the topic overlaps the community might not. Look at the discussion whether the Ubuntu and the Linux/Unix proposals should merge for a &quot;live&quot; example:  &#xD;&#xA;http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/unix-and-ubuntu-why-both/  &#xD;&#xA;http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/should-unix-linux-and-ubuntu-be-merged-vote/  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They will cover very similar topics, but likely with quite different audiences. There's the potential to have a larger user base in total even if each individual site is smaller, because there is a wider catchment for the audicence.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And does it matter if we end up with a question asked and answered on both? In my opinion - No. It's a positive because means two different types of people on the internet might be able to find that answer (and potentially join &amp; expand the relevant SE site)." />
  <row Id="2510" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="9193eb46-aeaf-447a-a0c7-9faada15d0ca" CreationDate="2010-08-21T10:54:19.197" UserId="9666" Comment="added 96 characters in body; deleted 131 characters in body" Text="**Questions that need to be improved or cleaned:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [What to do with old hard drives](http://superuser.com/questions/36340/what-to-do-with-old-hard-drives)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved, is the bold part needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Programmer Desk](http://superuser.com/questions/11391/programmer-desk)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: Offtopic, voted to close.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [IE 8 Issues](http://superuser.com/questions/1069)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: From the first sight it's unclear what the question is about, should be clarified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions that are done:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Why is “127.0.0.1 localhost” needed in HOSTS file ?](http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file)  &#xD;&#xA;   Status: Locked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file/178406#178406" />
  <row Id="2511" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1294" RevisionGUID="b095ecc3-f6db-4a3f-8e96-2a4ff07c5ef3" CreationDate="2010-08-21T13:21:44.537" UserId="9666" Comment="added 46 characters in body" Text="As time passes by, some questions/answers are forgotten...  &#xD;&#xA;Those present people with out-dated information that needs to be updated or cleaned up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are also questions/answers with bad formatting or that contain too much irrelevant information.  &#xD;&#xA;We could, for example, bring consistency in formatting in CW questions to increase readability...  &#xD;&#xA;Maybe even add screenshots where they fit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We should compile up a list with such questions and answers which anyone could contribute to,  &#xD;&#xA;so that people with enough reputation can improve those or mods could clean those up...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;     - [Title](Link to question/answer)  &#xD;&#xA;       Reason: Why the question should be improved or cleaned...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When a question or answer progresses, we can just add an extra line:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;       Status: Rejected/Unclear Reason/*Done*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please keep this list in my first answer and discuss this question in the comments.   &#xD;&#xA;When needed we could do a more important discussion in a separate answer to this question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For those editing:&#xD;&#xA;Remember to always respect the original author and to leave an edit reason.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2512" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1299" RevisionGUID="db77cbae-4b6a-409d-bc62-7a39dea7335c" CreationDate="2010-08-21T15:06:30.810" UserId="307" Comment="buried in the ears (pudding in the proof, but the strength is proven)" Text="I wouldn't call it dying. It's impossible that there will be enough exchanges in the near future to overlap everything on Super User. Look through the first three pages of [tags][1]. It would take quite some exchanges to cover all these, so as for completely dying? Not now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Intermezzo: Please note that the sites have 90 days to prove that they are worth it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what might really happen to Super User then? We would probably change to a more general than specific focus, questions that overlap multiple exchanges would thus belong on Super User. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just an example question that has no specific exchange: How many songs will fit in 1 GB?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This leaves us with: &quot;What about the increasing amount of questions that will need migration?&quot;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It looks like a bad idea to migrate and close more questions than usual...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/tags" />
  <row Id="2513" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="50dfb904-d9eb-43c2-ae2f-1be8384f8bb0" CreationDate="2010-08-21T18:22:06.460" UserId="34844" Comment="deleted 18 characters in body" Text="**Questions that need to be improved or cleaned:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [What to do with old hard drives](http://superuser.com/questions/36340/what-to-do-with-old-hard-drives)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved, is the bold part needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [IE 8 Issues](http://superuser.com/questions/1069)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: From the first sight it's unclear what the question is about, should be clarified.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions that are done:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Why is “127.0.0.1 localhost” needed in HOSTS file ?](http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file)  &#xD;&#xA;   Status: Locked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Programmer Desk](http://superuser.com/questions/11391/programmer-desk)  &#xD;&#xA;   Status: Closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file/178406#178406" />
  <row Id="2514" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="52defb3a-ac2d-4b5b-8869-af530ffedf8a" CreationDate="2010-08-21T18:29:44.573" UserId="34844" Comment="deleted 6 characters in body" Text="**Questions that need to be improved or cleaned:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [What to do with old hard drives](http://superuser.com/questions/36340/what-to-do-with-old-hard-drives)  &#xD;&#xA;   Reason: The formatting needs to be improved, is the bold part needed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions that are done:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Why is “127.0.0.1 localhost” needed in HOSTS file ?](http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file)  &#xD;&#xA;   Status: Locked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Programmer Desk](http://superuser.com/questions/11391/programmer-desk)  &#xD;&#xA;   Status: Closed.  	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [IE 8 Issues](http://superuser.com/questions/1069)  &#xD;&#xA;   Status: Improved readability and title so it's clear what the question is about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file/178406#178406" />
  <row Id="2515" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="2ea458ad-d454-4493-a2c5-fb6b64db7328" CreationDate="2010-08-21T19:07:16.750" UserId="9666" />
  <row Id="2516" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1301" RevisionGUID="61088a08-217f-48c2-9484-5e25cc4f8e07" CreationDate="2010-08-21T19:37:46.883" UserId="3110" Text="[DMA57361's answer][1] is the closest to describing the situation. (The other answers are right on what is on-topic or not, though. I really suggest you read our [FAQ][2] before posting such &quot;let's change everything it doesn't work&quot; topics.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are two important sides to keep in mind: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **The community**: the group of people coming regularly, who are running the site, and providing a good half of answers.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They need a common topic, a common &quot;reason&quot; to stick on the site. For Super User, it's the fact to have a good place to ask computer questions, instead of losing hours searching on forums. This is also the reason which caught me, a year ago, and motivated me to help the site, by answering, and helping with moderation. This site is currently the best place, in my opinion, to ask about your computer related issues.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;About the new sites, they are indeed playing this community aspect, on a closer way than Super User. There, it's really the feeling of belonging to a place where people use the same thing as you (Ubuntu, Apple, etc.). I guess your point is that since it will gather people more closely, questions related have nothing to do on Super User anymore. And this is where the second side is important to understand the whole picture:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **The people who just want an answer to their question:** the persons who are searching for a particular matter on a search engine, and find a Stack Exchange site. Or they will find an existing question, and the answers with it, or they will find the site, as a place to ask their specific question. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To these persons, it doesn't matter where they find their answer. If they search about a Ubuntu problem, they couldn't care less where they found the solution. They just want a solution. **And as long as they find it on the [Stack Exchange network][3], it means we are actually &quot;helping to make the Internet a better place&quot;™.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is why it doesn't matter if the sites overlap. Just because you have a site dedicated to Ubuntu, or Apple, doesn't mean you can't ask about them on Super User anymore. Super User welcomes all software and hardware questions (as long as they relate to your personal computer), that's the point of the site, that's its reason to be.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, to answer your question: **no, Super User is not dying, and is not even close to dying. It has a purpose, it has a community, and it attracts hundreds of new questions and answers every day.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1297/is-super-user-dying/1300#1300&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/faq&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="2518" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1011" RevisionGUID="433811e8-e1a7-418b-a09f-66610593aad2" CreationDate="2010-08-21T20:46:16.420" UserId="307" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:307,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;random&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2519" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1011" RevisionGUID="e9303555-ca3d-488f-b7df-b3f9678f9c3c" CreationDate="2010-08-21T20:46:16.607" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Official stance on Facebook questions on SU?](http://meta.superuser.com/questions/721/official-stance-on-facebook-questions-on-su)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Official stance on Facebook questions on SU?](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/30475/official-stance-on-facebook-questions-on-su)  &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;I wanted to ask a question about facebook in superuser only to discover that almost all questions tagged [facebook][1] have been closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the policy regarding asking user questions about websites (Wikipedia, Google, Gmail, etc) and social networks in particular (facebook, twitter).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand programming questions on facebook apps on StackOverflow are ok, as demonstrated by the large number of [related questions][2] there, that are actively being asked and discussed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question regards specifically user questions, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* How do I open a page?&#xD;&#xA;* How do I block a user?&#xD;&#xA;* How do I upload/delete/tag pictures/videos?&#xD;&#xA;* How do I set my privacy settings to blah, blah, blah?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/facebook&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/facebook" />
  <row Id="2520" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1011" RevisionGUID="88d1c65a-edd7-4465-aa3c-92482ce5f581" CreationDate="2010-08-21T20:46:43.017" UserId="307" Comment="edited tags" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; [Official stance on Facebook questions on SU?](http://meta.superuser.com/questions/721/official-stance-on-facebook-questions-on-su)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I wanted to ask a question about facebook in superuser only to discover that almost all questions tagged [facebook][1] have been closed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What's the policy regarding asking user questions about websites (Wikipedia, Google, Gmail, etc) and social networks in particular (facebook, twitter).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand programming questions on facebook apps on StackOverflow are ok, as demonstrated by the large number of [related questions][2] there, that are actively being asked and discussed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question regards specifically user questions, such as:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* How do I open a page?&#xD;&#xA;* How do I block a user?&#xD;&#xA;* How do I upload/delete/tag pictures/videos?&#xD;&#xA;* How do I set my privacy settings to blah, blah, blah?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/facebook&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/facebook" />
  <row Id="2521" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1302" RevisionGUID="55d3352b-e917-4a31-8d37-5c481f6f5ccc" CreationDate="2010-08-21T22:31:15.263" UserId="11546" Text="I have had an abundance of useful help and direction from users. Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I hope this is appropriate here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2522" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1302" RevisionGUID="55d3352b-e917-4a31-8d37-5c481f6f5ccc" CreationDate="2010-08-21T22:31:15.263" UserId="11546" Text="On the 1st anniversary of Superuser, I just want to say &quot;Thanks&quot;. " />
  <row Id="2523" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1302" RevisionGUID="55d3352b-e917-4a31-8d37-5c481f6f5ccc" CreationDate="2010-08-21T22:31:15.263" UserId="11546" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2524" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1302" RevisionGUID="55d3352b-e917-4a31-8d37-5c481f6f5ccc" CreationDate="2010-08-21T22:31:15.263" UserId="11546" />
  <row Id="2529" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1304" RevisionGUID="41bf3bd7-b821-48b8-b320-07a9888653b2" CreationDate="2010-08-22T04:58:30.117" UserId="4377" Text="You're welcome :)" />
  <row Id="2530" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1304" RevisionGUID="41bf3bd7-b821-48b8-b320-07a9888653b2" CreationDate="2010-08-22T04:58:30.117" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2533" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1305" RevisionGUID="9449deb0-0031-41f4-82e5-7d698f31b961" CreationDate="2010-08-22T11:24:46.720" UserId="9666" Text="I don't think that it is right that the community user is bumping [status-completed] questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What do you think?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about the other status tags?" />
  <row Id="2534" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1305" RevisionGUID="9449deb0-0031-41f4-82e5-7d698f31b961" CreationDate="2010-08-22T11:24:46.720" UserId="9666" Text="Community bumping [status-completed] on meta.SU?" />
  <row Id="2535" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1305" RevisionGUID="9449deb0-0031-41f4-82e5-7d698f31b961" CreationDate="2010-08-22T11:24:46.720" UserId="9666" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;community-user&gt;" />
  <row Id="2536" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1306" RevisionGUID="0348bfcf-2f23-4d70-b9dd-3b069e472fa4" CreationDate="2010-08-22T12:30:50.683" UserId="3981" Text="Since the questions have no accepted answer, they fall within the set of questions to be bumped. Even if an item is tagged completed, if no answer had been accepted, it is concerned an active and open question. This happens a lot when users do not come back to follow up, or do not agree that it is completed to their satisfaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are discussing with Jeff reducing the questions bumped on Meta as a whole, since the site does not generate a lot of traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A more detailed explanation of how it works can be found [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/48578/what-can-cause-my-question-to-be-bumped/48579#48579)" />
  <row Id="2537" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1305" RevisionGUID="c26c6988-03c4-47c3-965b-f6e6254d776a" CreationDate="2010-08-22T12:31:06.490" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;community-user&gt;" />
  <row Id="2538" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="465" RevisionGUID="f04a3c86-0516-452d-aeb9-7a6329101a8b" CreationDate="2010-08-22T14:25:20.677" UserId="517" Comment="Using official name of Super User -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, &quot;Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name&quot;." Text="It seems appropriate that questions concerning the usage of different software go to Super User, but there seems to be a bit of confusion as to whether or not questions asking about specific websites (generic example: &quot;Why can't I do [something] on Facebook?&quot;).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should we be condoning these types of questions? With the way the web has changed things over the past few years, web applications can be treated almost the same as desktop software (another example: Google Docs vs. Microsoft Office).&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2539" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="465" RevisionGUID="f04a3c86-0516-452d-aeb9-7a6329101a8b" CreationDate="2010-08-22T14:25:20.677" UserId="517" Comment="Using official name of Super User -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, &quot;Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name&quot;." Text="Should questions concerning specific websites be allowed on Super User?" />
  <row Id="2540" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="465" RevisionGUID="f04a3c86-0516-452d-aeb9-7a6329101a8b" CreationDate="2010-08-22T14:25:20.677" UserId="517" Comment="Using official name of Super User -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, &quot;Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name&quot;." Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2548" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1306" RevisionGUID="57b9053e-e496-4108-bde3-aa806d443da4" CreationDate="2010-08-22T15:44:25.353" UserId="3981" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="Since the questions have no accepted answer, they fall within the set of questions to be bumped. Even if an item is tagged completed, if no answer had been accepted, it is considered an active and open question. This happens a lot when users do not come back to follow up, or do not agree that it is completed to their satisfaction.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are discussing with Jeff reducing the questions bumped on Meta as a whole, since the site does not generate a lot of traffic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A more detailed explanation of how it works can be found [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/48578/what-can-cause-my-question-to-be-bumped/48579#48579)" />
  <row Id="2549" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1295" RevisionGUID="cb9441cf-ed6f-4651-9abb-affc19a0e21b" CreationDate="2010-08-22T16:12:05.290" UserId="4377" Comment="deleted 59 characters in body" Text="**Questions that need to be improved or cleaned:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions that are done:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Why is “127.0.0.1 localhost” needed in HOSTS file ?](http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file)  &#xD;&#xA;   Status: Locked.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [Programmer Desk](http://superuser.com/questions/11391/programmer-desk)  &#xD;&#xA;   Status: Closed.  	 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [IE 8 Issues](http://superuser.com/questions/1069)  &#xD;&#xA;   Status: Improved readability and title so it's clear what the question is about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - [What to do with old hard drives](http://superuser.com/questions/36340/what-to-do-with-old-hard-drives)  &#xD;&#xA;  Status: Done.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/178292/why-is-127-0-0-1-localhost-needed-in-hosts-file/178406#178406" />
  <row Id="2550" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="482" RevisionGUID="80235331-6089-4021-9754-6664635cacbe" CreationDate="2010-08-22T17:01:08.283" UserId="3110" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3110,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Gnoupi&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2551" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1307" RevisionGUID="564d2014-382e-4677-a168-6c40b75ec3ef" CreationDate="2010-08-22T19:50:07.653" UserId="3981" Text="I am not entirely sure if this question has much value for a few reasons:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 2K users have edit rights, and if they want to they can edit these questions, which is the purpose of having edit ability.&#xD;&#xA; - The mandate of the SO engine was exactly the above, to always have an up to date and correct answer to a single question, which is why we have mechanism to close as duplicate.&#xD;&#xA; - The community in due process naturally will update these questions as time goes by, and keeping a list here just adds additional overhead altogether.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As much as it may be a nice idea, this question and it's answers will simply become the same as the questions themselves. I agree with some of the comments, if you have the ability, edit it when you see, and move along.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2552" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1307" RevisionGUID="564d2014-382e-4677-a168-6c40b75ec3ef" CreationDate="2010-08-22T19:50:07.653" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2553" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1308" RevisionGUID="424033d5-d1d8-4ba1-9b62-55fd8fe2e28f" CreationDate="2010-08-23T16:47:17.517" UserId="5003" Text="If I have a question about Ubuntu, I now have 3 places I could take it to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://unix.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA; - http://ubuntu.stackexchange.com/&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It seems to me that Ubuntu is a subset of Linux/Unix which is a subset of Superuser, so if I have an Ubuntu question, I can really take it wherever I want.  What **should** I be doing?  Should we be migrating questions?  Should I be asking my questions at the narrowest level possible?  Or are some types of Ubuntu related questions more appropriate on each of these sites? Like a kernel compilation question might be best on the Unix/Linux level and things like that?" />
  <row Id="2554" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1308" RevisionGUID="424033d5-d1d8-4ba1-9b62-55fd8fe2e28f" CreationDate="2010-08-23T16:47:17.517" UserId="5003" Text="Superuser vs Unix/Linux vs Ubuntu" />
  <row Id="2555" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1308" RevisionGUID="424033d5-d1d8-4ba1-9b62-55fd8fe2e28f" CreationDate="2010-08-23T16:47:17.517" UserId="5003" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2556" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1309" RevisionGUID="4b933cc9-610f-4a15-b9f7-717646958575" CreationDate="2010-08-23T16:53:34.967" UserId="3981" Text="Until those sites come out of Beta, the option is really open at this point. Right now we still welcome Ubuntu/Linux questions, and since the sites may get merged before they are out of beta, SU will still be the most visible point since it is actively indexed and open.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please try avoiding cross posting. If the sites survive beta, we will be able to migrate questions in future." />
  <row Id="2557" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1261" RevisionGUID="5bbee091-2a1d-42a8-9958-6e001fc4072e" CreationDate="2010-08-23T18:57:49.920" UserId="36565" Comment="added 210 characters in body" Text="Should questions about a specific version of something have both the general tag of it and the version tag, or just the version tag? For example: If I'm asking &quot;How do the Home and Professional versions of Windows XP differ?&quot;, do I tag it [[windows]]+[[windows-xp]], or just [[windows-xp]]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What about regular questions about Windows, i.e. If I have a certain version of Windows, but my question isn't specifically about that version, for example: &quot;I need sound editing software for Windows. I'm on Windows XP.&quot;. On Mac OSX: &quot;I can't get printing working. I'm on OSX.&quot; Do I tag it [[mac]] and [[osx]], or just [[osx]]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [windows]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows&#xD;&#xA;  [windows-xp]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/windows-xp&#xD;&#xA;  [mac]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/mac&#xD;&#xA;  [osx]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/osx" />
  <row Id="2558" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1310" RevisionGUID="be3302af-d2be-4e44-9463-ceccfb4867d9" CreationDate="2010-08-23T20:58:30.147" UserId="1339" Text="For Mac OS X it's a bit different:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`[mac]` refers to the hardware  &#xD;&#xA;`[osx]` refers to all versions of Mac OS X in general&#xD;&#xA;`[osx-snow-leopard]` and such specify a specific version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've put more on the tag info pages: [Mac](http://superuser.com/questions/tagged?tagnames=mac&amp;sort=info&amp;pagesize=50) and [osx](http://superuser.com/questions/tagged?tagnames=osx&amp;sort=info&amp;pagesize=50)" />
  <row Id="2559" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1311" RevisionGUID="0ea4dc64-d714-481a-8ffe-f376226eeadc" CreationDate="2010-08-23T22:38:37.097" UserId="34844" Text="With the following question, http://superuser.com/questions/179135/interesting-windows-7-boot-issue-involving-raid-and-an-ssd, I'm not able to remove the quote block in which the code block is embedded. Without making it a quote, the code block won't show as illustrated here: http://superuser.com/posts/179135/revisions (Revisions 3 and 4)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What am I doing wrong here?" />
  <row Id="2560" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1311" RevisionGUID="0ea4dc64-d714-481a-8ffe-f376226eeadc" CreationDate="2010-08-23T22:38:37.097" UserId="34844" Text="Can not use code tag" />
  <row Id="2561" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1311" RevisionGUID="0ea4dc64-d714-481a-8ffe-f376226eeadc" CreationDate="2010-08-23T22:38:37.097" UserId="34844" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;markdown&gt;&lt;formatting&gt;" />
  <row Id="2562" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1312" RevisionGUID="8b082f0f-4ed4-4942-bca4-d692d856800f" CreationDate="2010-08-23T23:42:03.550" UserId="1339" Text="It's a gotcha when dealing with lists and code.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; List items may consist of multiple paragraphs. Each subsequent paragraph in a list item must be indented by either 4 spaces or one tab:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since code is also indented by 4 spaces/one tab it thinks it's a subsequent paragraph.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; To put a code block within a list item, the code block needs to be indented twice — 8 spaces or two tabs:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Markdown Syntax: List](http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#list)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Have edited the fix into the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2563" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1313" RevisionGUID="3ff5b13f-4d79-445a-a6cf-809db4db3a7a" CreationDate="2010-08-24T13:10:03.237" UserId="13567" Text="I just received my t-shirt today. Special thanks to Jeff, Robert, and Emily." />
  <row Id="2564" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1314" RevisionGUID="689561c9-f04f-47e6-a2c1-6cbdd57705e5" CreationDate="2010-08-24T19:24:59.797" UserId="3981" Text="Currently when using any of the links on the 10K+ users page the links are generating wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When clicking on Close/Delete the url is generated as &lt;kbd&gt;tag=Close&lt;/kbd&gt; instead of &lt;kbd&gt;tab=Close&lt;/kbd&gt;" />
  <row Id="2565" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1314" RevisionGUID="689561c9-f04f-47e6-a2c1-6cbdd57705e5" CreationDate="2010-08-24T19:24:59.797" UserId="3981" Text="10K Tools Page Broken on SuperUser" />
  <row Id="2566" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1314" RevisionGUID="689561c9-f04f-47e6-a2c1-6cbdd57705e5" CreationDate="2010-08-24T19:24:59.797" UserId="3981" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;interface&gt;&lt;10k&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="2567" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1314" RevisionGUID="94b45323-0a77-4964-a7cc-58434a608499" CreationDate="2010-08-25T07:02:59.907" UserId="3981" Comment="added 66 characters in body" Text="Currently when using any of the links on the 10K+ users page the links are generating wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When clicking on Close/Delete the url is generated as &lt;kbd&gt;tag=Close&lt;/kbd&gt; instead of &lt;kbd&gt;tab=Close&lt;/kbd&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Just tested Rev: 2010.8.24.5 and this is still not working**" />
  <row Id="2568" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1314" RevisionGUID="88f15dc6-673e-417f-94d0-2b7492a23789" CreationDate="2010-08-25T07:49:16.163" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;interface&gt;&lt;10k&gt;&lt;navigation&gt;" />
  <row Id="2569" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1311" RevisionGUID="90bd477b-8279-4f76-8044-d7c50754f90b" CreationDate="2010-08-25T07:49:39.283" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;markdown&gt;&lt;formatting&gt;" />
  <row Id="2570" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1315" RevisionGUID="6e62154a-c886-4b8e-9be3-da20b33bde84" CreationDate="2010-08-25T08:24:43.157" UserId="3981" Text="This has been fixed in the latest revision. [Source](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/62148/tab-links-on-recent-activity-page-dont-work/62169#62169)" />
  <row Id="2571" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1316" RevisionGUID="4c5777e3-2ebe-4cc0-baff-2a788ae074da" CreationDate="2010-08-25T12:22:29.040" UserId="34071" Text="Just got a question solved, and I selected an answer. For the sake of clarity I would like to go back to my original question and put the solution in the answer. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since my Question has multiple votes and it's favorited, will I lose those votes and favorite if I go back and edit the original question? &#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2572" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1316" RevisionGUID="4c5777e3-2ebe-4cc0-baff-2a788ae074da" CreationDate="2010-08-25T12:22:29.040" UserId="34071" Text="Do I lose all my question-votes if I go back and edit my question?" />
  <row Id="2573" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1316" RevisionGUID="4c5777e3-2ebe-4cc0-baff-2a788ae074da" CreationDate="2010-08-25T12:22:29.040" UserId="34071" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;voting&gt;" />
  <row Id="2574" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1317" RevisionGUID="186bb929-3f3d-495c-b54e-84d3051f49ff" CreationDate="2010-08-25T12:24:03.367" UserId="3110" Text="Votes are saved for the question in general, no matter of the revision.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In case a revision is really bad, people have the possibility to change their votes each time the question is edited. There is nothing automatic though, votes will stay." />
  <row Id="2575" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1318" RevisionGUID="0aef4c46-3970-4a75-8865-eb531d7b1e98" CreationDate="2010-08-25T14:42:53.177" UserId="39366" Text="I've just hit the 2000rep mark, and can now edit questions (hurrah! woot! etc, etc...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, I'm a little uneasy about editing other people's posts, as it's not something I've really experienced before (eg, I'm not a wiki user elsewhere), but at the same time would like to &quot;fix&quot; &quot;broken&quot; questions to help them along.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any guidelines? I've looked over MSO and found a few, but a lot of the relevant questions seem pretty old, and are related directly to SO. Obviously over time (and different sites) communities change, so I thought I'd ask if anyone has any important points they'd like to throw at me for the here and now?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that the golder rule of editing is **do not change the meaning**, but what else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just hoping to get a feel for what is expected and can maybe help out where relevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, would someone mind telling me if the edit I made on [this question][1] was justified and if it was within expected bounds, or maybe a bit excessive (I did play around with the grammer quite a bit...)?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://superuser.com/questions/180430/how-to-implement-a-lan-between-two-systems-without-a-modem" />
  <row Id="2576" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1318" RevisionGUID="0aef4c46-3970-4a75-8865-eb531d7b1e98" CreationDate="2010-08-25T14:42:53.177" UserId="39366" Text="Editing other's posts - guidelines / etiquette?" />
  <row Id="2577" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1318" RevisionGUID="0aef4c46-3970-4a75-8865-eb531d7b1e98" CreationDate="2010-08-25T14:42:53.177" UserId="39366" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;editing&gt;" />
  <row Id="2578" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1319" RevisionGUID="4332cda7-490a-46e7-88c6-9f32b205f2af" CreationDate="2010-08-25T15:23:13.063" UserId="307" Text="###Make the question title magic &#xD;&#xA;Spruce up vague and messy titles with keywords and clarity. Make it so it summarises as best as possible the problem at hand or what they want to achieve. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't leave tags all over the title. Leave or work in a reference to the program or OS if it reads naturally and pre-empts any possible ambiguity. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Formatting for beans&#xD;&#xA;If you spot a post and you know it can look like it's had a shower if only it was using the markdown properly, jump in and scrub it up. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That could mean setting command line entries on their own code block for clarity, fixing up a bullet list to use proper numbering and indentation (you'll spot them easy if you see number+close parenthesis) or spreading a wall of text into easier to parse paragraphs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Stories and fireside chats&#xD;&#xA;Whenever possible, try and have the first few sentences directly relate to the problem at hand. Often times you'll see people who feel the need to give us all a 10 minute life history before they even start their question. Leave those in, but after the nitty gritty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###No excess, no surrender&#xD;&#xA;An edit isn't at all excessive if the version after you've edited reads clearer and is formatted better. That helps us all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###No signatures or greetings&#xD;&#xA;Remove these as they just clutter up the question and serve no purpose. But no need to go on a spree if it's just &quot;Hi&quot; and everything else is fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Make it count&#xD;&#xA;Go in a get dirty, but make nice with the edits and really jazz up the post all you can while keeping the original intent intact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2579" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1319" RevisionGUID="4332cda7-490a-46e7-88c6-9f32b205f2af" CreationDate="2010-08-25T15:23:13.063" UserId="307" />
  <row Id="2580" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1320" RevisionGUID="ab69ad5f-fca4-4897-bf7b-c23b4eadc5d4" CreationDate="2010-08-25T16:10:18.060" UserId="2394" Text="The 'top 20 answerers' link is broken in the Tag Wiki page." />
  <row Id="2581" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1320" RevisionGUID="ab69ad5f-fca4-4897-bf7b-c23b4eadc5d4" CreationDate="2010-08-25T16:10:18.060" UserId="2394" Text="Top 20 answerers link broken" />
  <row Id="2582" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1320" RevisionGUID="ab69ad5f-fca4-4897-bf7b-c23b4eadc5d4" CreationDate="2010-08-25T16:10:18.060" UserId="2394" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;tag-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="2583" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1318" RevisionGUID="45a27abb-552a-499b-b87c-70e2cbe1b76b" CreationDate="2010-08-25T16:38:48.047" UserId="2553" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;editing&gt;&lt;etiquette&gt;" />
  <row Id="2584" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1320" RevisionGUID="73d948b0-a4f5-4e96-aad4-9a62f558a7bd" CreationDate="2010-08-26T09:18:47.777" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;tag-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="2585" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1319" RevisionGUID="63d3d280-71fc-43de-804b-989191055578" CreationDate="2010-08-26T15:06:37.167" UserId="36565" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="###Make the question title magic &#xD;&#xA;Spruce up vague and messy titles with keywords and clarity. Make it so it summarises as best as possible the problem at hand or what they want to achieve. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Don't leave tags all over the title. Leave or work in a reference to the program or OS if it reads naturally and pre-empts any possible ambiguity. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Formatting for beans&#xD;&#xA;If you spot a post and you know it can look like it's had a shower if only it was using the markdown properly, jump in and scrub it up. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That could mean setting command line entries on their own code block for clarity, fixing up a bullet list to use proper numbering and indentation (you'll spot them easy if you see number+close parenthesis) or spreading a wall of text into easier to parse paragraphs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Stories and fireside chats&#xD;&#xA;Whenever possible, try and have the first few sentences directly relate to the problem at hand. Often times you'll see people who feel the need to give us all a 10 minute life history before they even start their question. Leave those in, but after the nitty gritty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###No excess, no surrender&#xD;&#xA;An edit isn't at all excessive if the version after you've edited reads clearer and is formatted better. That helps us all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###No signatures or greetings&#xD;&#xA;Remove these as they just clutter up the question and serve no purpose. But no need to go on a spree if it's just &quot;Hi&quot; and everything else is fine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Make it count&#xD;&#xA;Go in and get dirty, but make nice with the edits and really jazz up the post all you can while keeping the original intent intact.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2590" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1322" RevisionGUID="e597990a-7de0-44cd-baf4-a870ca744354" CreationDate="2010-08-27T12:47:32.800" UserId="39366" Text="I've just spotted that, according to the [questions tab](http://superuser.com/questions), SU has now surpassed **50000 questions**!  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;sub&gt;And what's worrying is that I've posted an answer on just over ~0.2% (or 1/500&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt;) of them...&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For comparison SO is nearing 900k (wow!) and SF is just behind with 45k.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, anyway, do we get extra presents to go with the birthday competition?  &#xD;&#xA;Or do we have to reach a better milestone first?  &#xD;&#xA;Maybe 65535?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;I'm aware this is off topic, but if I'm going to post my *first ever* off topic post it might as well be for something (sort of) important. And hidden away on meta...&lt;/sup&gt;" />
  <row Id="2591" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1322" RevisionGUID="e597990a-7de0-44cd-baf4-a870ca744354" CreationDate="2010-08-27T12:47:32.800" UserId="39366" Text="SU hits 50000 questions." />
  <row Id="2592" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1322" RevisionGUID="e597990a-7de0-44cd-baf4-a870ca744354" CreationDate="2010-08-27T12:47:32.800" UserId="39366" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="2593" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1323" RevisionGUID="1b845ac2-33a3-4ef8-a320-ac2e6318fb6e" CreationDate="2010-08-27T16:21:28.650" UserId="13459" Text="Apologies if this has been asked before. But I am curious: can moderators etc. can see edits made within 5 minutes? I ask because I answered a question one minute after someone else but they they quickly changed their answer to include information from mine. But since early edits are apparently not recorded it makes it look like I am to blame for duplicating their answer. This sort of thing could become very annoying if it happens again." />
  <row Id="2594" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1323" RevisionGUID="1b845ac2-33a3-4ef8-a320-ac2e6318fb6e" CreationDate="2010-08-27T16:21:28.650" UserId="13459" Text="Can Moderators See Edits Made to Answers Within 5 Minutes?" />
  <row Id="2595" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1323" RevisionGUID="1b845ac2-33a3-4ef8-a320-ac2e6318fb6e" CreationDate="2010-08-27T16:21:28.650" UserId="13459" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;editing&gt;" />
  <row Id="2596" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1323" RevisionGUID="c5a2acc7-8342-4d43-af4d-1b47468c162b" CreationDate="2010-08-27T16:34:36.063" UserId="13459" Comment="deleted 5 characters in body" Text="Apologies if this has been asked before. But I am curious: can moderators etc. can see edits made within 5 minutes? I ask because I answered a question one minute after someone else but they quickly changed their answer to include information from mine. But since early edits are apparently not recorded it makes it look like I am to blame for duplicating their answer. This sort of thing could become very annoying if it happens again." />
  <row Id="2597" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1322" RevisionGUID="29c39796-16d3-4bbf-ad43-183ea0a550a6" CreationDate="2010-08-27T19:39:49.130" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="2" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:13567,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Mehper C. Palavuzlar&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:820,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;heavyd&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1548,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Ivo Flipse&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2598" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1324" RevisionGUID="7bb3f967-1b55-4ff2-a756-8b1458f60363" CreationDate="2010-08-27T19:49:29.603" UserId="41423" Text="I often wade fairly deep into the Unanswered Questions list, and after the first few pages I start seeing questions that were posted months ago.  If there has been steady activity since the original post, I have no qualms about jumping in with my own answer/comments.  But often these older questions have had little or no recent activity.  Worse, the original poster often seems to have abandoned the question as there is no evidence that they ever responded to answers or comments, and obviously no answer was accepted.  In these cases, I can't help wondering whether I should bother adding my own answer or comments, even if I think I can contribute meaningfully.  What's the general feeling on this?  Perhaps if there was more obvious encouragement to answer older questions it would help.  I'm not sure what that would look like, but maybe an extra point or two for contributing to older questions?" />
  <row Id="2599" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1324" RevisionGUID="7bb3f967-1b55-4ff2-a756-8b1458f60363" CreationDate="2010-08-27T19:49:29.603" UserId="41423" Text="Is there any point answering questions that have had no recent activity?" />
  <row Id="2600" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1324" RevisionGUID="7bb3f967-1b55-4ff2-a756-8b1458f60363" CreationDate="2010-08-27T19:49:29.603" UserId="41423" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2601" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1325" RevisionGUID="078e626b-61ed-464a-8787-84638c4a0792" CreationDate="2010-08-27T20:28:21.660" UserId="1048" Text="There's a question currently open, but with one vote to close as duplicate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/181510/how-to-enable-fast-user-switching-in-mac-os-x-10-6-4&quot;&gt;open question&lt;/a&gt; is about fast user switching in Mac OS 10.6.4 (aka Snow Leopard). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/questions/76388/leopard-how-to-change-user-without-closing-applications-running&quot;&gt;original question&lt;/a&gt; has an answer that does correctly answer the new question, but has &quot;leopard&quot; in the title and is explicitly tagged as `osx-leopard`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If we simply close the current question, future users might ignore the other because of its title and tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Options I see:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Leave the new one open as an answer for Snow Leopard&#xD;&#xA; - Close the new one and edit the original to either add the Snow Leopard tag or simply remove release specific wording and tags&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2602" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1325" RevisionGUID="078e626b-61ed-464a-8787-84638c4a0792" CreationDate="2010-08-27T20:28:21.660" UserId="1048" Text="Editing and retagging to make a duplicate fit?" />
  <row Id="2603" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1325" RevisionGUID="078e626b-61ed-464a-8787-84638c4a0792" CreationDate="2010-08-27T20:28:21.660" UserId="1048" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retagging&gt;&lt;duplicates&gt;" />
  <row Id="2604" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1326" RevisionGUID="dbc0b0c9-2ee0-4fcc-945b-1e4a1bf2e2d7" CreationDate="2010-08-27T20:44:09.780" UserId="34844" Text="I don't know if you should specifically award this with rep... However I do get what you mean and have only this to say:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;People with questions come looking for answers on Super User and might have exactly that same question. If you have contributed by means of a useful answer, those people may vote up your answer (As well as others, since it is shown on the front page after an answer has been added). In addition, it will help those people and they won't have to create a duplicate question which will then be closed as a duplicate! Hurray!" />
  <row Id="2605" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1327" RevisionGUID="b96ea607-043a-4725-b6ee-810d7082702f" CreationDate="2010-08-27T21:32:09.103" UserId="34844" Text="Just a little check...&#xD;&#xA;THIS IS AN EARLY EDIT.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Timeline doesn't show an edit either: http://meta.superuser.com/posts/1323/timeline... Too bad :(" />
  <row Id="2606" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1328" RevisionGUID="79efdc75-1bec-4163-be2f-b1a9052d17cc" CreationDate="2010-08-28T04:31:02.470" UserId="1" Text="No, they cannot. Edits within the grace period are the same as the original entry of the post..." />
  <row Id="2607" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1329" RevisionGUID="7eb4caee-22d8-4c29-b027-070c4d805276" CreationDate="2010-08-28T04:34:00.123" UserId="1" Text="I think yes -- if it's a good answer, I will *always* upvote it, regardless of how old the question is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this assumes the original question is interesting enough for me to click on in some way -- if it's a really bad question (title, etc) or an extremely obscure topic. However, this can sometimes be fixed with editing..&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thus, if you have the rights to edit (2k rep), I would &quot;punch up&quot; the question as well when answering to maximize the chances of people seeing both the question and your answer." />
  <row Id="2608" PostHistoryTypeId="11" PostId="1322" RevisionGUID="6735adda-5f87-46d3-8fc2-4621a2b3e111" CreationDate="2010-08-28T04:35:03.477" UserId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2609" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1330" RevisionGUID="1a4945fe-d22f-4ac3-93fd-1cf37ebf47c9" CreationDate="2010-08-28T04:38:06.917" UserId="1" Text="Indeed, and we're saying &quot;thank you&quot; to the whole community that made Super User work!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/super-user-1-year-anniversary-super-contest/" />
  <row Id="2610" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1330" RevisionGUID="1a4945fe-d22f-4ac3-93fd-1cf37ebf47c9" CreationDate="2010-08-28T04:38:06.917" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="2611" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1331" RevisionGUID="12214e10-6c39-4890-a3e0-4787f15969df" CreationDate="2010-08-28T05:01:52.500" UserId="1339" Text="I think updating the older question to fit would be the perfect fit - I would have done it at the time if I had the time." />
  <row Id="2612" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1332" RevisionGUID="34d00a93-ae95-4a96-90eb-83a5baf18a12" CreationDate="2010-08-27T17:00:44.043" UserId="33300" Text="I´m having some trouble with the [valuable flair][1] you can place on your own website. &#xD;&#xA;I want to place it into the sidebar of my blog. The poblem is, the sidebars width is only 190px. The valuable flair is 210px. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it somehow possible to smallen it? I dont want to broaden my sidebar.  &#xD;&#xA;For example display it with width 105 and height 30.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For better understandment you can look at it on [my blog][2]. i left it there although it doesn´t fit properly to show you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/flair&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://diskilla.de" />
  <row Id="2613" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1332" RevisionGUID="34d00a93-ae95-4a96-90eb-83a5baf18a12" CreationDate="2010-08-27T17:00:44.043" UserId="33300" Text="Is it possible to make the valuable flair appear smaller?" />
  <row Id="2614" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1332" RevisionGUID="34d00a93-ae95-4a96-90eb-83a5baf18a12" CreationDate="2010-08-27T17:00:44.043" UserId="33300" Text="&lt;html&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;&lt;user-flair&gt;" />
  <row Id="2615" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1332" RevisionGUID="11a482c2-463f-4d22-9b07-e74f0200eeb6" CreationDate="2010-08-28T09:06:29.187" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/181466/is-it-possible-to-make-the-valuable-flair-appear-smaller" Text="" />
  <row Id="2616" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="757" RevisionGUID="fc026255-7db3-4f08-b30d-a493e5d47430" CreationDate="2010-08-28T13:30:29.760" UserId="517" Comment="Using official name of Super User -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, &quot;Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name&quot;." Text="With the changes made to the policies recently, and the amount of hits Super User is taking at the moment, I would like to suggest that the current FAQ is updated as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about ...&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - computer hardware &#xD;&#xA; - computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;… and it is not about &#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA; - videogames or consoles&#xD;&#xA; - websites or web services like facebook, twitter and wordpress&#xD;&#xA; - cellphones or mobile devices excluding iPhones&#xD;&#xA; - electronic devices or media players&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; then you're in the right place to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't believe it should be a big list but these are the common one's that seems to cause tension during the closing of questions. It's useful to just direct people to the FAQ rather then having to type a comment every time.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2617" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="757" RevisionGUID="fc026255-7db3-4f08-b30d-a493e5d47430" CreationDate="2010-08-28T13:30:29.760" UserId="517" Comment="Using official name of Super User -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, &quot;Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name&quot;." Text="Update the Super User FAQ" />
  <row Id="2618" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1333" RevisionGUID="09fda7e6-6353-4f95-8982-3a1a12b06c43" CreationDate="2010-08-28T15:35:01.510" UserId="36565" Text="I just noticed that my question, [Windows Setup could not configure Windows to run on this computer's hardware][1] is still not Community Wiki after 11 revisions. It's odd because according to [this answer][2] on [What are “Community Wiki” posts?][3], posts are automatically converted to Community Wiki after 10 revisions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/171200/windows-setup-could-not-configure-windows-to-run-on-this-computers-hardware&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11740/what-are-community-wiki-posts/11741#11741&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11740/what-are-community-wiki-posts" />
  <row Id="2619" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1333" RevisionGUID="09fda7e6-6353-4f95-8982-3a1a12b06c43" CreationDate="2010-08-28T15:35:01.510" UserId="36565" Text="Why is this not Community Wiki?" />
  <row Id="2620" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1333" RevisionGUID="09fda7e6-6353-4f95-8982-3a1a12b06c43" CreationDate="2010-08-28T15:35:01.510" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="2621" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1318" RevisionGUID="5b3da20a-93f4-43f2-9c55-37a739930299" CreationDate="2010-08-28T17:07:07.727" UserId="20088" Comment="Fixed grammar (other's -&gt; others') and misspelling (golder -&gt; golden)" Text="I've just hit the 2000rep mark, and can now edit questions (hurrah! woot! etc, etc...).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But, I'm a little uneasy about editing other people's posts, as it's not something I've really experienced before (eg, I'm not a wiki user elsewhere), but at the same time would like to &quot;fix&quot; &quot;broken&quot; questions to help them along.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Are there any guidelines? I've looked over MSO and found a few, but a lot of the relevant questions seem pretty old, and are related directly to SO. Obviously over time (and different sites) communities change, so I thought I'd ask if anyone has any important points they'd like to throw at me for the here and now?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand that the golden rule of editing is **do not change the meaning**, but what else?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just hoping to get a feel for what is expected and can maybe help out where relevant.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, would someone mind telling me if the edit I made on [this question][1] was justified and if it was within expected bounds, or maybe a bit excessive (I did play around with the grammer quite a bit...)?  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://superuser.com/questions/180430/how-to-implement-a-lan-between-two-systems-without-a-modem" />
  <row Id="2622" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1318" RevisionGUID="5b3da20a-93f4-43f2-9c55-37a739930299" CreationDate="2010-08-28T17:07:07.727" UserId="20088" Comment="Fixed grammar (other's -&gt; others') and misspelling (golder -&gt; golden)" Text="Editing others' posts - guidelines / etiquette?" />
  <row Id="2623" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1332" RevisionGUID="2dac50f1-aeaf-4d8d-9b6f-bd14156fd52a" CreationDate="2010-08-28T19:52:28.773" UserId="33300" Comment="added 105 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I´m having some trouble with the [valuable flair][1] you can place on your own website. &#xD;&#xA;I want to place it into the sidebar of my blog. The poblem is, the sidebars width is only 190px. The valuable flair is 210px. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it somehow possible to smallen it? I dont want to broaden my sidebar.  &#xD;&#xA;For example display it with width 105 and height 30.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For better understandment you can look at it on [my blog][2]. i left it there although it doesn´t fit properly to show you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;edit: I tried defining the .valuable-flair css buit it alway gets overwritten by the Flair-default.css.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/flair&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://diskilla.de" />
  <row Id="2624" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1332" RevisionGUID="2dac50f1-aeaf-4d8d-9b6f-bd14156fd52a" CreationDate="2010-08-28T19:52:28.773" UserId="33300" Comment="added 105 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;html&gt;&lt;iframe&gt;&lt;user-flair&gt;" />
  <row Id="2625" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1334" RevisionGUID="cc3fbb0a-063b-4cc0-af22-64c4b635ba50" CreationDate="2010-08-28T20:57:12.060" UserId="4377" Text="Strange, my 12th revision didn't trigger switch to CW. Note [that answer][1] mentions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the rules outlined above are based on observations; the actual behavior of SO is subject to change without notice, and may well have done so since this was last updated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might be plausible that the limit has been increased ? &#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11740/what-are-community-wiki-posts/11741#11741" />
  <row Id="2626" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1334" RevisionGUID="4dec0c56-41ab-4dad-91a5-c5bcb55e83b4" CreationDate="2010-08-28T21:11:35.957" UserId="4377" Comment="added 207 characters in body" Text="Strange, my 12th revision didn't trigger switch to CW. Note [that answer][1] mentions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the rules outlined above are based on observations; the actual behavior of SO is subject to change without notice, and may well have done so since this was last updated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It might be plausible that the limit has been increased ? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Went digging further, and [this answer][2] got converted to CW on the 11th edit. Are the limits different for questions and answers ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11740/what-are-community-wiki-posts/11741#11741&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/posts/181722/revisions" />
  <row Id="2627" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1335" RevisionGUID="aa9d60e5-3f40-45cf-86ff-c08a4e3e415c" CreationDate="2010-08-28T23:13:48.130" UserId="34844" Text="Try using `!important` in the CSS, like:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    .valuable-flair{&#xD;&#xA;        width: 190px !important;&#xD;&#xA;    }&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Checkout the &quot;Javascript&quot; section on http://meta.superuser.com/users/flair&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Note&#xD;&#xA;&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&gt; There are a few different default&#xD;&#xA;&gt; themes you can apply to your flair&#xD;&#xA;&gt; named: clean, dark, and hotdog. To&#xD;&#xA;&gt; specify a new theme pass a querystring&#xD;&#xA;&gt; parameter of theme equal to one of&#xD;&#xA;&gt; these values. If you want to style&#xD;&#xA;&gt; your flair manually, specify a theme&#xD;&#xA;&gt; of none and add CSS to style each&#xD;&#xA;&gt; element. An example of the CSS styles&#xD;&#xA;&gt; applied to flair is below." />
  <row Id="2628" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1333" RevisionGUID="62cbd267-c327-489c-866d-98c22727d3e6" CreationDate="2010-08-29T00:51:47.427" UserId="36565" Comment="added 57 characters in body" Text="I just noticed that my question, [Windows Setup could not configure Windows to run on this computer's hardware][1] is still not Community Wiki after [11 revisions][2]. It's odd because according to [this answer][3] on [What are “Community Wiki” posts?][4], posts are automatically converted to Community Wiki after 10 revisions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/171200/windows-setup-could-not-configure-windows-to-run-on-this-computers-hardware&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/posts/171200/revisions&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11740/what-are-community-wiki-posts/11741#11741&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11740/what-are-community-wiki-posts" />
  <row Id="2629" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1336" RevisionGUID="c2ae8b25-4096-4aef-b9e0-121430913cff" CreationDate="2010-08-30T06:07:07.060" UserId="38035" Text="This question was closed as subjective and argumentative:  &#xD;&#xA;[What's your favourite “super user” Anti-boss technique][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Waiting for the &quot;[Not Programming related][2]&quot; proposal, i thought my question would fit here on SuperUser.  &#xD;&#xA;Here some other examples of questions not closed that sound like mine:&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;[What's Your Favorite Harmless Computer Practical Joke?][3]  &#xD;&#xA;[What's your favourite “super user” cartoon?][4]  &#xD;&#xA;[What's the weirdest thing you've ever seen a non-techie do to a computing device?][5] &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; so, why my question was closed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/182282/whats-your-favourite-super-user-anti-boss-technique&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/3352/not-programming-related&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/4714/whats-your-favorite-harmless-computer-practical-joke&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superuser.com/questions/554/whats-your-favourite-super-user-cartoon&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://superuser.com/questions/5321/whats-the-weirdest-thing-youve-ever-seen-a-non-techie-do-to-a-computing-device" />
  <row Id="2630" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1336" RevisionGUID="c2ae8b25-4096-4aef-b9e0-121430913cff" CreationDate="2010-08-30T06:07:07.060" UserId="38035" Text="Why this question was closed?" />
  <row Id="2631" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1336" RevisionGUID="c2ae8b25-4096-4aef-b9e0-121430913cff" CreationDate="2010-08-30T06:07:07.060" UserId="38035" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2632" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1336" RevisionGUID="f7efa877-c3f4-4a1b-8541-90aa340812ee" CreationDate="2010-08-30T06:32:52.203" UserId="38035" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="2634" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1337" RevisionGUID="2612773c-0209-4b49-a705-1d12567d8f2f" CreationDate="2010-08-30T06:59:07.663" UserId="1" Text="I think it's .. mmm .. OK. Maybe &quot;mostly harmless&quot; is the right way to describe it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This sort of thing would have definitely survived in the early days of SU but sites tend to get stricter over time in my experience.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can support re-opening it, if it is edited to meet, say, 1 or 2 other SU community mods approval." />
  <row Id="2635" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1338" RevisionGUID="f133a1c9-fbe6-4226-848e-e889e38b9c82" CreationDate="2010-08-30T07:26:07.593" UserId="3981" Text="As Jeff pointed out already communities get stricter, and because of the wide audience SU is especially strict.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Since this particular question was closed solely by the community and not by a diamond moderator, I am not convinced going against the community is a good idea.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for listing older questions that have not been closed, understand that policies change and we do not always retroactively apply changes. Some questions where posted early on, and never made the home page again, and therefore remain open. When they are highlighted, like in this question, they suddenly generate interest again, and we start a new circle of closing wars." />
  <row Id="2636" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1339" RevisionGUID="6de38e62-03ae-4126-87ac-791ae57f9bc5" CreationDate="2010-08-30T11:29:11.523" UserId="15774" Text="A new user came up with a conclusive answer to [a question of mine][1] on which I had put a bounty a few months ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to start another bounty to award the user who solved the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why is the &quot;start bounty&quot; button missing in this question? I can see it in other questions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/114321/mysterious-xyz-event-files-appearing/181459#181459" />
  <row Id="2637" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1339" RevisionGUID="6de38e62-03ae-4126-87ac-791ae57f9bc5" CreationDate="2010-08-30T11:29:11.523" UserId="15774" Text="Why can't I start another bounty for this question?" />
  <row Id="2638" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1339" RevisionGUID="6de38e62-03ae-4126-87ac-791ae57f9bc5" CreationDate="2010-08-30T11:29:11.523" UserId="15774" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="2640" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1341" RevisionGUID="9c556e6e-288b-47c2-815e-6458af3dcbdc" CreationDate="2010-08-30T15:32:41.520" UserId="307" Text="Can't see a link to add a bounty either. Doesn't matter that it already has an accepted answer, they're no longer tied to the bounty.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, the [bounty exclusion rules are][1]:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You already have an active bounty on any question (only one is allowed)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, never set a bounty in the system. That exclusion doesn't apply.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Lacking sufficient rep to start a bounty (100 is the minimum)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;At 3000+ that's not the problem in this case, some 2900+ over the 100 minimum required to set even the smallest of bounties.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Question is not yet 2 days old (the minimum age) &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;That question was asked six months ago, so that's not the problem either.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But then maybe that is the problem. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [change in the bounty system was announced two months ago][2] and may be an edge condition where the new and the old settings of bounties just aren't quite getting along.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/54726/missing-start-a-bounty-link-on-stackoverflow/54772#54772 &quot;from the main land&quot;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/06/improvements-to-bounty-system/  &quot;bloggity-blog-blog&quot;" />
  <row Id="2641" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1333" RevisionGUID="9fdb71f2-5141-47de-a73a-380e7c9bc85d" CreationDate="2010-08-30T15:45:44.463" UserId="36565" Comment="added 10 characters in body" Text="I just noticed that my question, [Windows Setup could not configure Windows to run on this computer's hardware][1] is still not Community Wiki after [&lt;s&gt;11&lt;/s&gt; 13 revisions][2]. It's odd because according to [this answer][3] on [What are “Community Wiki” posts?][4], posts are automatically converted to Community Wiki after 10 revisions.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/171200/windows-setup-could-not-configure-windows-to-run-on-this-computers-hardware&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/posts/171200/revisions&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11740/what-are-community-wiki-posts/11741#11741&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/11740/what-are-community-wiki-posts" />
  <row Id="2643" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1342" RevisionGUID="efcf90b2-5bad-4f3b-847b-28020d3f980a" CreationDate="2010-08-30T22:55:13.250" UserId="1" Text="This post is to document the **week 1** winners of the [Super User Super Contest][contest], for the week ending **Monday, August 30**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Congratulations to our winners this week!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [Best rookie][suleague] performance by [**KronoS**][rookie]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![best rookie performance week of 08-23-2010][rookiepic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. [Highest reputation][suleague] produced by [**digitxp**][toprep]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![top users week of 08-23-2010][topreppic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Best meta post:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [Is there any point answering questions that have had no recent activity?][bestmeta] by [**boot13**][bestmetauser]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Most awesome new question or answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [Should I unmount a USB drive before unplugging it?][bestweek] by [**systempuntout**][bestweekuser]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are contacting the winners now, so be sure to check your email inboxes!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[contest]:      http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/super-user-1-year-anniversary-super-contest/&#xD;&#xA;[suleague]:     http://stackexchange.com/leagues/3/week/superuser/2010-08-23&#xD;&#xA;[rookiepic]:    http://i.imgur.com/XmT2V.png&#xD;&#xA;[topreppic]:    http://i.imgur.com/3WU3v.png&#xD;&#xA;[bestweek]:     http://superuser.com/questions/180722/should-i-unmount-a-usb-drive-before-unplugging-it&#xD;&#xA;[bestweekuser]: http://superuser.com/users/38035/systempuntoout&#xD;&#xA;[bestmeta]:     http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1324/is-there-any-point-answering-questions-that-have-had-no-recent-activity&#xD;&#xA;[bestmetauser]: http://superuser.com/users/41423/boot13&#xD;&#xA;[rookie]:       http://superuser.com/users/47225/kronos&#xD;&#xA;[toprep]:       http://superuser.com/users/23420/digitxp" />
  <row Id="2644" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1342" RevisionGUID="efcf90b2-5bad-4f3b-847b-28020d3f980a" CreationDate="2010-08-30T22:55:13.250" UserId="1" Text="Super Contest Winners: Week 1" />
  <row Id="2645" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1342" RevisionGUID="efcf90b2-5bad-4f3b-847b-28020d3f980a" CreationDate="2010-08-30T22:55:13.250" UserId="1" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;super-contest&gt;" />
  <row Id="2646" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1343" RevisionGUID="89fca888-504b-447f-9818-b6f9cf3773dd" CreationDate="2010-08-30T23:01:47.270" UserDisplayName="Harpreet" Text="I guess the web related software questions can be asked in either of the websites - superuser or webapps? Am I correct?" />
  <row Id="2647" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1343" RevisionGUID="89fca888-504b-447f-9818-b6f9cf3773dd" CreationDate="2010-08-30T23:01:47.270" UserDisplayName="Harpreet" Text="How do web-software related questions differ in superuser from questions in webapps of stackexhange?" />
  <row Id="2648" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1343" RevisionGUID="89fca888-504b-447f-9818-b6f9cf3773dd" CreationDate="2010-08-30T23:01:47.270" UserDisplayName="Harpreet" Text="&lt;software&gt;&lt;web&gt;&lt;webapp&gt;&lt;stack-exchange&gt;" />
  <row Id="2649" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1343" RevisionGUID="d86eb740-7899-40b4-82fc-c6f9cee5cd62" CreationDate="2010-08-30T23:05:28.743" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/182757/how-do-web-software-related-questions-differ-in-superuser-from-questions-in-webap" Text="" />
  <row Id="2650" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1344" RevisionGUID="99b127af-33f0-4555-80ce-ae8860fdbc7f" CreationDate="2010-08-30T23:10:02.757" UserId="47225" Text="Refering to the FAQ:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt;computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt;and it is not about …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;videogames or consoles&#xD;&#xA;&gt;websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&gt;electronic devices, media players, cell phones or smart phones, except insofar as they &gt;interface with your computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt;a shopping or buying recommendation&#xD;&#xA;&gt;… then you're in the right place to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the FAQ of the weapp states:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;What kind of questions can I ask here?&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Web Apps - Stack Exchange is for expert and advanced users of web applications, so if your question generally covers …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Gmail&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Facebook&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Twitter&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt;… or any other website which behaves like an application, then you're in the right place &gt;to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With that said, it appears that interpretation allows for questions to be synonymous nature.  " />
  <row Id="2651" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1345" RevisionGUID="0a7f7537-77e8-4ab9-b4ca-ab454e92a998" CreationDate="2010-08-30T23:10:09.030" UserId="1548" Text="If it's about a problem with the browser, it belongs on Super User. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have an issue with using a website or web app, it belongs on Web Apps. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you have a question about browser plugins that interact with specific web apps, I I would encourage anyone to ask these questions on Web Apps, rather than Super User&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All website related questions are explicitly off-topic for Super User, as [you can read in our FAQ](http://superuser.com/faq)" />
  <row Id="2652" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1344" RevisionGUID="48a79102-ddc6-4576-9907-2edf9cd10467" CreationDate="2010-08-30T23:10:48.717" UserId="1548" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Refering to the FAQ:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt;computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt;and it is not about …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;videogames or consoles&#xD;&#xA;&gt;websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&gt;electronic devices, media players, cell phones or smart phones, except insofar as they &gt;interface with your computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt;a shopping or buying recommendation&#xD;&#xA;&gt;… then you're in the right place to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the FAQ of Web Apps states:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;What kind of questions can I ask here?&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Web Apps - Stack Exchange is for expert and advanced users of web applications, so if your question generally covers …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Gmail&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Facebook&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Twitter&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt;… or any other website which behaves like an application, then you're in the right place &gt;to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With that said, it appears that interpretation allows for questions to be synonymous nature.  " />
  <row Id="2653" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1344" RevisionGUID="38976005-22a4-411c-8fc5-bf92d50f0338" CreationDate="2010-08-30T23:12:28.587" UserId="47225" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="Refering to the FAQ:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Super User is for computer enthusiasts and power users. If you have a question about …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;computer hardware&#xD;&#xA;&gt;computer software&#xD;&#xA;&gt;and it is not about …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;videogames or consoles&#xD;&#xA;&gt;websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&gt;electronic devices, media players, cell phones or smart phones, except insofar as they interface with your computer&#xD;&#xA;&gt;a shopping or buying recommendation&#xD;&#xA;&gt;… then you're in the right place to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and the FAQ of Web Apps states:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;What kind of questions can I ask here?&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Web Apps - Stack Exchange is for expert and advanced users of web applications, so if your question generally covers …&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Gmail&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Facebook&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Twitter&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Google&#xD;&#xA;&gt;… or any other website which behaves like an application, then you're in the right place &gt;to ask your question!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;With that said, it appears that interpretation allows for questions to be synonymous nature.  " />
  <row Id="2654" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1342" RevisionGUID="ea0ed5a4-debc-427c-8b7f-dfe4f76ee333" CreationDate="2010-08-30T23:24:35.073" UserId="1" Comment="edited body" Text="This post is to document the **week 1** winners of the [Super User Super Contest][contest], for the week ending **Monday, August 30**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Congratulations to our winners this week!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [Best rookie][suleague] performance by [**KronoS**][rookie]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![best rookie performance week of 08-23-2010][rookiepic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. [Highest reputation][suleague] produced by [**digitxp**][toprep]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![top users week of 08-23-2010][topreppic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Best meta post:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [Is there any point answering questions that have had no recent activity?][bestmeta] by [**boot13**][bestmetauser]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Most awesome new question or answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [Should I unmount a USB drive before unplugging it?][bestweek] by [**systempuntout**][bestweekuser]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are contacting the winners now, so be sure to check your email inboxes!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[contest]:      http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/super-user-1-year-anniversary-super-contest/&#xD;&#xA;[suleague]:     http://stackexchange.com/leagues/3/week/superuser/2010-08-23&#xD;&#xA;[rookiepic]:    http://i.imgur.com/IKVEn.png&#xD;&#xA;[topreppic]:    http://i.imgur.com/3WU3v.png&#xD;&#xA;[bestweek]:     http://superuser.com/questions/180722/should-i-unmount-a-usb-drive-before-unplugging-it&#xD;&#xA;[bestweekuser]: http://superuser.com/users/38035/systempuntoout&#xD;&#xA;[bestmeta]:     http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1324/is-there-any-point-answering-questions-that-have-had-no-recent-activity&#xD;&#xA;[bestmetauser]: http://superuser.com/users/41423/boot13&#xD;&#xA;[rookie]:       http://superuser.com/users/47225/kronos&#xD;&#xA;[toprep]:       http://superuser.com/users/23420/digitxp" />
  <row Id="2655" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1346" RevisionGUID="f222ecf8-8cf4-4e91-b962-434181265577" CreationDate="2010-08-30T23:27:20.893" UserId="4377" Text="Congrats to the winners :D" />
  <row Id="2656" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1343" RevisionGUID="1bb59b1c-f896-4e6a-9431-5cf0d554fb9a" CreationDate="2010-08-30T23:27:50.690" UserId="307" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;&lt;websites&gt;" />
  <row Id="2657" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1347" RevisionGUID="628720b2-0b75-409f-841c-c06645ccf9ae" CreationDate="2010-08-31T06:46:31.063" UserId="472" Text="I realise this question - http://superuser.com/questions/15798/worst-web-site-design-ever - isn't appropriate for Super User, but did it just get deleted and that's it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;IMHO it had some decent low class entertainment value and it would be a shame to see its answers disappear forever. Has it been moved or can it be moved to a more appropriate Stack Exchange site?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2658" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1347" RevisionGUID="628720b2-0b75-409f-841c-c06645ccf9ae" CreationDate="2010-08-31T06:46:31.063" UserId="472" Text="What happened to question &quot;Worst Web Site Design Ever&quot;?" />
  <row Id="2659" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1347" RevisionGUID="628720b2-0b75-409f-841c-c06645ccf9ae" CreationDate="2010-08-31T06:46:31.063" UserId="472" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;deleted-questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="2660" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1348" RevisionGUID="570df9d5-0665-4cca-b2a3-05a69d97789b" CreationDate="2010-08-31T07:00:50.453" UserId="3981" Text="**Yes**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It has been deleted and are visible only to 10K+ users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**No**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can't be moved since none of the other sites are out of beta and we don't know when moving to these sites will be possible. It will also depend on which site survive beta.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In short. If you want to see it again on a more appropriate SE site then feel free to re-post it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As to why it was deleted, please see my answer [here](http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1336/why-this-question-was-closed/1338#1338)" />
  <row Id="2661" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1349" RevisionGUID="801604ae-62d6-4824-8fef-27d33e18502b" CreationDate="2010-08-31T11:05:02.290" UserId="39366" Text="Looking at [this][1] question, I recognise both of the two large images in the top two answers - I'm *sure* I've seen both on a Stack Exchange question *somewhere* (I suspect *not* SU), but for the life of me cannot find it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The user who posted the question *also* posted both answers, and is clearly making a lot of rep out of the question. I'm slightly worried that ***if*** this is a copy question, the user is cheating the system with plagiarised content.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've not placed this a comment on the question due to my lack of evidence, and the potential for me to have just imagined it, but the more I look at the two images the more I convince myself they're not new to SE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So thought I'd raise it for the wider audience to see if anyone else recognises them or if I am simply going mad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://superuser.com/questions/182800/explain-how-the-internet-works-to-a-complete-computer-novice" />
  <row Id="2662" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1349" RevisionGUID="801604ae-62d6-4824-8fef-27d33e18502b" CreationDate="2010-08-31T11:05:02.290" UserId="39366" Text="Is this question a copy?" />
  <row Id="2663" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1349" RevisionGUID="801604ae-62d6-4824-8fef-27d33e18502b" CreationDate="2010-08-31T11:05:02.290" UserId="39366" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;duplicates&gt;" />
  <row Id="2664" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1350" RevisionGUID="cd18aca4-943a-4804-9903-482bc63f190f" CreationDate="2010-08-31T12:48:06.043" UserId="23420" Text="I keep wondering this: if somebody with 13 rep writes an answer instead of a comment (because they can't) is it appropriate to downvote that? " />
  <row Id="2665" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1350" RevisionGUID="cd18aca4-943a-4804-9903-482bc63f190f" CreationDate="2010-08-31T12:48:06.043" UserId="23420" Text="New Users—Cutting Slack?" />
  <row Id="2666" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1350" RevisionGUID="cd18aca4-943a-4804-9903-482bc63f190f" CreationDate="2010-08-31T12:48:06.043" UserId="23420" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;new-users&gt;" />
  <row Id="2667" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1351" RevisionGUID="828dc0b0-2fff-4d3b-81d9-aaa745e1c44f" CreationDate="2010-08-31T13:15:41.193" UserId="39366" Text="Good question.  &#xD;&#xA;My answer in short - *it depends entirely on what they've posted*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I remember starting on here and being very frustrated that I couldn't comment (I'd been a reader of SO for some time, so had a pretty good understanding of how things worked before I started). Okay, 50 rep isn't a *lot*, but it's still a fair barrier against a brand new user interacting outside of the first few questions/answer that they post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a balance we need to achieve between preventing clutter/noise on the site and making sure we don't discourage new users. And it's a difficult balance to get right, particularly considering so many users can vote down, and most of them will not be involved in this conversation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*Personally*, I'm more inclined to go with a gentle reminder, where suitable, but ultimately it depends entirely on what they have posted:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* If it **adds value** then it should be kept live and therefore doesn't deserve down-voting, but nudging the user to re-post as a comment (maybe at a later time) is the way forward to keep the site tidy.&#xD;&#xA;* If their comment **adds nothing** then it *deserves deletion*, and the best way to encourage that is by a down-vote (unless it's also offensive/etc in which case flagging is better).  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Final thought&#xD;&#xA;Remember that if these users *delete* the response that they will get all lost rep back again (possibly after a recalc?), as will those who downvoted. So this is not necessarily *permanent* damage to the users rep - unless, of course, we scare them off." />
  <row Id="2668" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1352" RevisionGUID="829168d8-8a14-4ba1-8ae4-110933a59b73" CreationDate="2010-08-31T14:53:59.230" UserId="36565" Text="I believe it is because the last bounty was awarded not soon ago, meaning there is a minimum time between bounties. I couldn't see it yesterday either, but now I can." />
  <row Id="2669" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1353" RevisionGUID="33b9bc68-1581-4a07-a47f-65b9516b72e6" CreationDate="2010-08-31T15:34:36.500" UserId="3981" Text="This was a bug and has been fixed by Jarod. [Source](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/62810/no-start-a-bounty-link-on-question)" />
  <row Id="2670" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1339" RevisionGUID="288a127d-8b9e-4402-b659-20891f1d7c6a" CreationDate="2010-08-31T15:35:05.967" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="2671" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1354" RevisionGUID="e38b9b5f-b06a-4319-962d-b5f5e486c33d" CreationDate="2010-08-31T15:36:39.783" UserId="34844" Text="I don't know where they came from and I think you're right that people should credit sources where due, yet there is no no rule on the SE frame that states you have to credit source. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although of course it is not much appreciated and against the law if the work is under license that requires crediting, until one can acquire proof of such a thing (e.g. the original source or a comment by the original author) no measures can be taken. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you do find the source it originated from, don't be shy to post credit in a comment to those answers and address the author of the answer about his/her inappropriate behaviour." />
  <row Id="2672" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1355" RevisionGUID="40e87a1b-cd8c-47fa-a281-976542e78012" CreationDate="2010-09-01T08:38:25.940" UserId="40289" Text="Super User doesn't provide facility to rethrow the same question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It can only be roll-backed !&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Shouldn't there be the facility to Re-Throw the same question to top for limited no of times ? There can be condition that if question is not being answered or if it gets minimum 3 votes then, in both condition, it can be rethrown !" />
  <row Id="2673" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1355" RevisionGUID="40e87a1b-cd8c-47fa-a281-976542e78012" CreationDate="2010-09-01T08:38:25.940" UserId="40289" Text="Rethrow the Question !" />
  <row Id="2674" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1355" RevisionGUID="40e87a1b-cd8c-47fa-a281-976542e78012" CreationDate="2010-09-01T08:38:25.940" UserId="40289" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="2675" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1356" RevisionGUID="a99a730b-e57e-4165-8a81-0770703cd3d6" CreationDate="2010-09-01T09:02:22.597" UserId="39366" Text="I assume you mean the action of &quot;bumping&quot; a question back up the front page?  &#xD;&#xA;I ask because I'm not sure how your mention of rolling back fits in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has been discussed on MetaSO before, (for example [this question](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/1477/please-add-a-way-to-bump-questions-back-to-the-front-page) and those linked to it) and I'm fairly sure has been rejected but the team and many users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have a question that you want to get more attention for then I suggest that you edit it to add in additional information, and anything that you've already tried to fix your problem with, etc. This will make the question better, easier for others to answer *and* push it back up the page." />
  <row Id="2676" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1357" RevisionGUID="22f96b23-b195-49e2-b717-5c01313976d3" CreationDate="2010-09-01T09:08:52.597" UserId="39366" Text="Well, this question has almost had 24hrs and since no-one else seems to also recognise them, I shall assume that I've imagined seeing these elsewhere on SE and not worry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unless someone jumps in with something today I'll tick this post off tomorrow so this question can be discarded.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks to BloodPhilia for some valid points regarding attribution as well." />
  <row Id="2677" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1355" RevisionGUID="51578a69-8f22-43cb-8890-19222a2c97fe" CreationDate="2010-09-01T09:31:58.437" UserId="3981" CloseReasonId="20" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3981,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Diago&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2678" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1358" RevisionGUID="efca632a-542a-4385-aedc-28a24c388465" CreationDate="2010-09-02T00:10:23.567" UserId="6574" Text="I have created a **Super User** page on Facebook.  I need information such as when Super User was founded, our mission, etc...check out the page and provide insights and suggestions...and of course, *Like Super User's page!*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I also need a high-resolution image of the Super User logo (the existing is low dpi)...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.facebook.com/pages/Super-User/151566448195623?v=info#!/pages/Super-User/151566448195623 " />
  <row Id="2679" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1358" RevisionGUID="efca632a-542a-4385-aedc-28a24c388465" CreationDate="2010-09-02T00:10:23.567" UserId="6574" Text="Created Super User page on Facebook - need info..." />
  <row Id="2680" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1358" RevisionGUID="efca632a-542a-4385-aedc-28a24c388465" CreationDate="2010-09-02T00:10:23.567" UserId="6574" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="2681" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1359" RevisionGUID="9462f2d5-1c4a-4022-bb9e-dfbe6a62af76" CreationDate="2010-09-02T00:36:21.850" UserId="9666" Text="Look at [Need a hassle-free backup solution for Windows — needs to be bootable][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, look at its related questions, some of them are closed because they are a duplicate.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Should this be considered a duplicate or should the title be improved to reflect this specific request?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/183637/need-a-hassle-free-backup-solution-for-windows-needs-to-be-bootable" />
  <row Id="2682" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1359" RevisionGUID="9462f2d5-1c4a-4022-bb9e-dfbe6a62af76" CreationDate="2010-09-02T00:36:21.850" UserId="9666" Text="A lot of backup questions, duplicate or improve title?" />
  <row Id="2683" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1359" RevisionGUID="9462f2d5-1c4a-4022-bb9e-dfbe6a62af76" CreationDate="2010-09-02T00:36:21.850" UserId="9666" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;duplicates&gt;" />
  <row Id="2684" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1360" RevisionGUID="4f26b2a5-b74e-4aa7-9288-238e6b3f5d31" CreationDate="2010-09-02T06:50:18.210" UserId="3981" Text="You can find all the required information on the SO blog [here](http://blog.stackoverflow.com) under the Super User tag. For a more detailed history on the SO and the engine you look at the pod-casts tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You will need to email the team at the address at the bottom of the page for the high res logo. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, please state clearly that the page is in no way linked or managed by Super User or StackOverflow LLC but maintained by members of the site independently." />
  <row Id="2685" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1361" RevisionGUID="d64e5f99-f38c-490c-b0cf-05eafe5ed908" CreationDate="2010-09-02T08:31:38.220" UserId="34844" Text="Created an SVG file for the logo (just the left part, the entire logo is a work in progress), look below =)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.fruityjuice.nl/files/images/Superuser_Logo.svg" />
  <row Id="2686" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1361" RevisionGUID="db21e602-377f-4863-b8ef-5402014d8533" CreationDate="2010-09-02T09:04:04.717" UserId="34844" Comment="added 20 characters in body; added 2 characters in body; added 103 characters in body" Text="Created an SVG file for the logo, look below =)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.fruityjuice.nl/files/images/Superuser_Logo_Final.svg  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.fruityjuice.nl/files/images/Superuser_Logo_Complete_Final.svg&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know if this is legal, please let me know if it is not and I'll remove as soon as possible." />
  <row Id="2687" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1362" RevisionGUID="daada146-93ab-4ab5-914c-b66fcc90b651" CreationDate="2010-09-02T16:06:35.023" UserId="697" Text="I appreciate your enthusiasm for supporting Super User but, unfortunately, that page looks like it's THE official Super User Facebook page. I sounds like a nice idea, but it is going to run up against our Trademark Policy (see [Guidelines for the Use of the Stack Exchange Trademarks](http://superuser.com/legal/trademark-guidance)).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps it would work better if you can make a Super User fan page. But it would have to be visually clear that it is a fan page by a member of the community. You wouldn't be able to use the logo and name to brand the page, but you can use flair and smaller logos when you are referring to the site in the context of your content. The best thing to do is read the trademark guidelines.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know that much about Facebook; they have fan pages and they have organization pages. I don't know how these work or how you can make it so one can distinguish between &quot;Community pages&quot; and &quot;Official pages.&quot; Maybe someone here can fill in the blanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the goal is to make it clear that you are a well-meaning fan and not trying to pass the site off as being THE Super User page. Let me know if you have any questions." />
  <row Id="2688" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1363" RevisionGUID="ac44a271-3d1e-43be-95ad-af7bba7a3760" CreationDate="2010-09-02T20:09:30.743" UserId="307" Text="Tagged **[support]**, these questions are generally when you would like to know how to better squeeze the experience juice out of Super User.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Be it questions about reputation, closed questions, the bounty system or things that scratch your head and poise to pose." />
  <row Id="2689" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1364" RevisionGUID="90024b23-e277-4e9a-aa49-a5a43c95b6ec" CreationDate="2010-09-02T20:09:30.743" UserId="307" Text="Better Super User through use and working out why things are or how to better your experience here." />
  <row Id="2690" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1365" RevisionGUID="b11af21c-5524-4f03-bf09-8b51aeaac132" CreationDate="2010-09-02T20:15:02.990" UserId="307" Text="When a feature request or bug report is floated, it will find its end in one of a few ways. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**[status-completed]** is where all those tickets and questions come to their state of &quot;doneness&quot;. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This can mean:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- a bug has now been quashed with a recent development or a change in the Stack Exchange engine.&#xD;&#xA;- a requested feature or change has been deployed, or a related development in the SE engine renders this request obsolete or as good as completed." />
  <row Id="2691" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1366" RevisionGUID="381055a6-1b29-4c92-82ab-82bff20211d4" CreationDate="2010-09-02T20:15:02.990" UserId="307" Text="Bug reports marked resolved or feature requests filed as done and live." />
  <row Id="2692" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1367" RevisionGUID="107e812d-fa8c-47f0-b7d9-bc3d86222276" CreationDate="2010-09-02T20:36:54.667" UserId="307" Text="If you spot something that might be wrong or broken with the site, do report it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When you do, include your browser and maybe the operating system you were browsing from to better help us resolve your issue.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Note on beta browsers&#xD;&#xA;Beta browsers, those on nightly builds and not yet released to the public as stable releases, are not supported. If your issue only comes up when viewing the site using a beta browser, sorry, but it won't be worked around for. Best just wait it out or use another browser." />
  <row Id="2693" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1368" RevisionGUID="afe1d752-1be2-427f-8cff-f4e9923c44e6" CreationDate="2010-09-02T20:36:54.667" UserId="307" Text="Something amiss or broken with how you're working with the site? Report it." />
  <row Id="2694" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1369" RevisionGUID="67fb530b-f28f-481c-ac52-f7d4c5903553" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:07:11.207" UserId="20088" Text="Tonight I went to edit [this post][1] to fix the link, which the poster had entered in BBcode rather than Markdown. When I went to submit the edit, I got this error message, which I've never seen before:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Sorry, posts can't contain that content][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The error says that posts can't contain that content, nor that title. However, the only thing I modified was the link text, so why was I getting that error when the post obviously contained the rest of that content when it was originally posted?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/184171/how-to-extend-partition&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/Imjzk.png" />
  <row Id="2695" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1369" RevisionGUID="67fb530b-f28f-481c-ac52-f7d4c5903553" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:07:11.207" UserId="20088" Text="What content am I being blocked from editing and why?" />
  <row Id="2696" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1369" RevisionGUID="67fb530b-f28f-481c-ac52-f7d4c5903553" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:07:11.207" UserId="20088" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;editing&gt;" />
  <row Id="2697" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1370" RevisionGUID="946fecfc-1d5d-462f-bb8a-ab84c2c53680" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:11:51.350" UserId="39366" Text="Was trying to edit the following question to fix the broken URL:  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/184171/how-to-extend-partition&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Upon submitting I get the following error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  * Sorry, posts can't contain that content.   &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  * Sorry, post titles can't contain that content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I literally just fixed the URL and added tick marks around &quot;C:&quot;, and the error message doesn't make it clear **what** &quot;that&quot; content is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What happened? / What did I do wrong? / Something broken?" />
  <row Id="2698" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1370" RevisionGUID="946fecfc-1d5d-462f-bb8a-ab84c2c53680" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:11:51.350" UserId="39366" Text="Unable to edit a question because of &quot;that content&quot;?" />
  <row Id="2699" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1370" RevisionGUID="946fecfc-1d5d-462f-bb8a-ab84c2c53680" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:11:51.350" UserId="39366" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;editing&gt;&lt;error&gt;" />
  <row Id="2700" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1371" RevisionGUID="0e1d3401-54b9-4403-b432-ec92aae0d0d5" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:24:22.040" UserId="3981" Text="This particular post happens to be spam, and has been reported to the SO mods.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have removed it from SU in the meantime. The content blocker most likely picked up on the spam which prevented the editing from happening." />
  <row Id="2701" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1370" RevisionGUID="4fdb2eb8-fade-4d01-8657-333dc70cb4ab" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:24:58.467" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:39366,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;DMA57361&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:20088,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;nhinkle&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:3981,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Diago&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2702" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1370" RevisionGUID="4eab1ee5-2111-41b5-b4dd-632109d3f6c3" CreationDate="2010-09-03T08:24:58.763" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [What content am I being blocked from editing and why?](http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1369/what-content-am-i-being-blocked-from-editing-and-why)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Was trying to edit the following question to fix the broken URL:  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/184171/how-to-extend-partition&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Upon submitting I get the following error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  * Sorry, posts can't contain that content.   &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  * Sorry, post titles can't contain that content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I literally just fixed the URL and added tick marks around &quot;C:&quot;, and the error message doesn't make it clear **what** &quot;that&quot; content is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What happened? / What did I do wrong? / Something broken?" />
  <row Id="2703" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1372" RevisionGUID="2bf40829-bc6a-4c94-9be3-b3618119ee4b" CreationDate="2010-09-03T10:40:19.723" UserId="1548" Text="If the answers in the original question didn't answer his question, he should add details that make his question distinctly different, that way it's no longer a duplicate&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest you start creating an awesome tag wiki for backup solutions, that way at least it will be easier for people to spot them." />
  <row Id="2704" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1373" RevisionGUID="7dccf018-c3fd-4183-af50-4f5328e58bd1" CreationDate="2010-09-03T13:02:31.793" UserId="39559" Text="I just posted my first question on SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First attempt was vetted as it lacked tags. I understood: better not make a question without tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second attempt with tags: I went through this particularly tough captcha procedure and only after that it my question was vetted as it had too many tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Third attempt, I removed one tag, submitted the question, and realized that SU does not yet believe that I am a Human and gave me a new captcha :-(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it the way it is supposed to be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can only think of two reasonable scenaria: (i) I am only asked to prove that I am a human in the very last step before my actions are going to produce some effect on the site and generate a new question/answer/comment/whatever; (ii) I am not re-asked to prove that I am Human before I effectively make quite a few question/answer/comment/whatever." />
  <row Id="2705" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1373" RevisionGUID="7dccf018-c3fd-4183-af50-4f5328e58bd1" CreationDate="2010-09-03T13:02:31.793" UserId="39559" Text="Are-you-human broken flow for super-tagged questions" />
  <row Id="2706" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1373" RevisionGUID="7dccf018-c3fd-4183-af50-4f5328e58bd1" CreationDate="2010-09-03T13:02:31.793" UserId="39559" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;interface&gt;&lt;user-interface&gt;&lt;re-captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="2707" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1374" RevisionGUID="c99dcd92-015b-4b92-b69f-d03dc907a934" CreationDate="2010-09-03T13:49:37.947" UserId="39366" Text="Questions require 1-5 tags - no more, no less.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I occasionaly get hit by multiple captchas whenever I do a quick re-edit or three on my new posts to pick up spelling / grammer / flow / etc. I guess you triggered one by exhibiting &quot;odd&quot; question posting behaviour. However, **this makes sense**, otherwise someone with a bot would just manually answer the first captcha and switch thier bot on - multiple checks *are* needed to prevent this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, I think it makes sense for the question validation to be before the user validation - check the tag's etc before bothering with the captcha. Maybe there's a design choice in there somewhere we don't know about." />
  <row Id="2708" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1375" RevisionGUID="676d60d5-6fda-4ac4-b00f-34c7cabae580" CreationDate="2010-09-03T15:57:43.447" UserId="4377" Text="&gt; Is it the way it is supposed to be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; can only think of two reasonable scenaria: (i) I am only asked to prove that I am a human in the very last step before my actions are going to produce some effect on the site and generate a new  a new question/answer/comment/whatever; (ii) I am not re-asked to prove that I am Human before I effectively make quite a few question/answer/comment/whatever.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm sorry, but I couldn't gist of the above two sentences - they seem gibberish to me. The captcha was thrown to you because you seemingly exhibited a behaviour common to spam bots - rapid post and edits. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does this mean you're a spam bot ? No. Are you the only one facing this ? No. I encounter the same captcha a lot of times ( no surprise really, given the number of edits and at the pace at which I do them). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2709" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1373" RevisionGUID="aa38f348-7c56-4275-bbd9-26855db65653" CreationDate="2010-09-03T15:59:02.167" UserId="4377" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;interface&gt;&lt;user-interface&gt;&lt;re-captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="2710" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1376" RevisionGUID="69153e38-f781-4b71-a443-45b605c268ef" CreationDate="2010-09-03T18:45:20.130" UserId="9666" Text="[How to cancel hard disk from wanting to format and how to get my files back?](http://superuser.com/questions/184344/how-to-cancel-hard-disk-from-wanting-to-format-and-how-to-get-my-files-back)  &#xD;&#xA;This question is tagged [data] but you know it's about data from the recovery tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Best Light Software to Manage Large Amounts of Data?](http://superuser.com/questions/180036/best-light-software-to-manage-large-amounts-of-data)  &#xD;&#xA;This question is tagged both [database] and [data], but [database] inherits [data], right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[How to quicky connect to a sqlite database with OpenOffice.org Base?](http://superuser.com/questions/169963/how-to-quicky-connect-to-a-sqlite-database-with-openoffice-org-base)  &#xD;&#xA;This question is tagged [data], but shouldn't it be tagged [database] instead?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[[data]](http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/data)  &#xD;&#xA;Shows some more issues of tags that are actually multiple words and might need a hyphen:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Should [free] + [data] be [free-data] or just [free]?&#xD;&#xA; - Should [data] + [query] be [data-query] or just [query]?&#xD;&#xA; - Should [data] + [validation] be [data-validation] or just [validation]?&#xD;&#xA; - Should [data] + [file] be [file-data] or [data-file] or [file] or maybe nothing or something else?&#xD;&#xA; - ..." />
  <row Id="2711" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1376" RevisionGUID="69153e38-f781-4b71-a443-45b605c268ef" CreationDate="2010-09-03T18:45:20.130" UserId="9666" Text="Is [data] a meta tag?" />
  <row Id="2712" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1376" RevisionGUID="69153e38-f781-4b71-a443-45b605c268ef" CreationDate="2010-09-03T18:45:20.130" UserId="9666" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2713" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1376" RevisionGUID="dfb5723b-79f2-4677-b107-db8a18857493" CreationDate="2010-09-03T19:56:27.183" UserId="9666" Comment="added 14 characters in body; added 1 characters in body" Text="[How to cancel hard disk from wanting to format and how to get my files back?](http://superuser.com/questions/184344/how-to-cancel-hard-disk-from-wanting-to-format-and-how-to-get-my-files-back)  &#xD;&#xA;This question is tagged [data] but you know it's about [data] from the [hard-drive-recovery] tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Best Light Software to Manage Large Amounts of Data?](http://superuser.com/questions/180036/best-light-software-to-manage-large-amounts-of-data)  &#xD;&#xA;This question is tagged both [database] and [data], but [database] inherits [data], right?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[How to quicky connect to a sqlite database with OpenOffice.org Base?](http://superuser.com/questions/169963/how-to-quicky-connect-to-a-sqlite-database-with-openoffice-org-base)  &#xD;&#xA;This question is tagged [data], but shouldn't it be tagged [database] instead?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[[data]](http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/data)  &#xD;&#xA;Shows some more issues of tags that are actually multiple words and might need a hyphen:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Should [free] + [data] be [free-data] or just [free]?&#xD;&#xA; - Should [data] + [query] be [data-query] or just [query]?&#xD;&#xA; - Should [data] + [validation] be [data-validation] or just [validation]?&#xD;&#xA; - Should [data] + [file] be [file-data] or [data-file] or [file] or maybe nothing or something else?&#xD;&#xA; - ..." />
  <row Id="2714" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1377" RevisionGUID="21111a40-788f-4747-87d5-5570252f1c14" CreationDate="2010-09-03T21:00:11.073" UserId="3981" Text="No it's not. I could refer to the data on my drive, the data in memory or various other meanings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I **do not** consider it to be a meta tag. It is valid within the context of using a computer. Meta tags indicate something outside of the norm, like for example beginner or learning." />
  <row Id="2715" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1376" RevisionGUID="597f7ef2-a831-4a1a-b55d-89dc4ce322b4" CreationDate="2010-09-03T22:01:11.317" UserId="9666" Comment="Improved title to denote what I mean..." Text="Is [data] an useful tag? Do we really need it? What should we do with it?" />
  <row Id="2716" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1376" RevisionGUID="fe6ed39f-ce69-4527-84be-f26bbb4aea2b" CreationDate="2010-09-03T22:31:22.747" UserId="9666" Comment="Made title shorter, I hate things that wrap around... xD" Text="Is [data] an useful tag? Do we need it? What should we do?" />
  <row Id="2717" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1378" RevisionGUID="d6d63fae-2881-46b7-9480-bc64d864498c" CreationDate="2010-09-04T18:24:55.403" UserId="10131" Text="I just received a notification on the SU site that I was awarded a &quot;Taxonomist&quot; badge for the &quot;autocomplete&quot; tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is that I did not create the &quot;autocomplete&quot; tag. Actually none of the 8 questions I asked is using &quot;autocomplete&quot;?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bug in the Matrix? Something to do with an answer I made to a question that had the &quot;autocomplete&quot; tag (although I doubt it)?" />
  <row Id="2718" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1378" RevisionGUID="d6d63fae-2881-46b7-9480-bc64d864498c" CreationDate="2010-09-04T18:24:55.403" UserId="10131" Text="Wrong &quot;taxonomist&quot; badge received" />
  <row Id="2719" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1378" RevisionGUID="d6d63fae-2881-46b7-9480-bc64d864498c" CreationDate="2010-09-04T18:24:55.403" UserId="10131" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="2720" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1379" RevisionGUID="3848eadc-247b-493c-af26-1aa8bb51fda2" CreationDate="2010-09-04T19:03:29.660" UserId="34844" Text="When one opens a question and starts typing a title, a list of possible duplicate questions is shown as illustrated below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I assume that this isn't used often since some quite obvious duplicates are still created on Super User. Perhaps a &quot;I checked the list and it wasn't there&quot; checkbox could be added to solve this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover however, I'd like to be able to fetch this list when viewing the question. I think it'd allow the higher rep users to locate and assign duplicates faster and more efficient. Checking for duplicates now consists of searching a duplicate while this would be much quicker.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example: Add a link (Find possible duplicates) next to &quot;close&quot; and &quot;edit&quot; that will open an overlay div (Like the closing reasons div) and display the same list as above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/GEWsk.png" />
  <row Id="2721" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1379" RevisionGUID="3848eadc-247b-493c-af26-1aa8bb51fda2" CreationDate="2010-09-04T19:03:29.660" UserId="34844" Text="See possible duplicates in question." />
  <row Id="2722" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1379" RevisionGUID="3848eadc-247b-493c-af26-1aa8bb51fda2" CreationDate="2010-09-04T19:03:29.660" UserId="34844" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;duplicate&gt;" />
  <row Id="2723" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1380" RevisionGUID="00d18abb-4cb9-4702-8dff-e41422bd626b" CreationDate="2010-09-05T00:29:16.120" UserId="9666" Text="My guess is that this will not be implemented as the percentage of users that checks this is rather small.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As my interest lies in this and writing user scripts I decided to write one to solve this anyway:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[The user script can be obtained here][1], it works in Google Chrome, not tested on Firefox yet...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This adds a link at the top of the bar on the right which says &quot;Show Related.&quot;,  &#xD;&#xA;that links function serves as a toggle to show and hide the related questions above the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note that the related question is only fetched when clicking that link, so don't excessively click it...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tom.hsc.be/meta/related.user.js" />
  <row Id="2724" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1380" RevisionGUID="b8ee24dd-9597-4818-a9fc-bd4a70064122" CreationDate="2010-09-05T00:36:57.257" UserId="9666" Comment="deleted 9 characters in body; added 72 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body; added 79 characters in body" Text="My guess is that this will not be implemented as the percentage of users that checks this is rather small.&#xD;&#xA;As my interest lies in this and writing user scripts I decided to write one to solve this anyway:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[The user script can be obtained here][1], [the source here][2], it works for both Google Chrome and Firefox...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This adds a link at the top of the bar on the right which says &quot;Show Related.&quot;,  &#xD;&#xA;that links function serves as a toggle to show and hide the related questions above the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note that the related question is only fetched when clicking that link, so don't excessively click it...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Known bug: The title itself shows up in the list too, might fix this later...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tom.hsc.be/meta/related.user.js&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tom.hsc.be/meta/related.user.txt" />
  <row Id="2725" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1380" RevisionGUID="0676c1fc-af7e-4ecb-aec6-70b35f2c853d" CreationDate="2010-09-05T00:45:25.490" UserId="9666" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; added 47 characters in body" Text="My guess is that this will not be implemented as the percentage of users that checks this is rather small.&#xD;&#xA;As my interest lies in this and writing user scripts I decided to write one to simplify it now:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[The user script can be obtained here][1], [the source here][2],  &#xD;&#xA;it works for both Google Chrome and Firefox, also written to work on any (beta) SE site...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This adds a link at the top of the bar on the right which says &quot;Show Related.&quot;,  &#xD;&#xA;that links function serves as a toggle to show and hide the related questions above the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note that the related question is only fetched when clicking that link, so don't excessively click it...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Known bug: The title itself shows up in the list too, might fix this later...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tom.hsc.be/meta/related.user.js&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tom.hsc.be/meta/related.user.txt" />
  <row Id="2726" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1380" RevisionGUID="cbb034a5-75c8-4164-ac41-873a8414d1a0" CreationDate="2010-09-05T00:52:35.270" UserId="9666" Comment="Fixed the known bug, hiding the first one should be enough. What can be better than an exact match? My human error, probably... Jeff Atwood should punish me then. :P; deleted 6 characters in body" Text="My guess is that this will not be implemented as the percentage of users that checks this is rather small.&#xD;&#xA;As my interest lies in this and writing user scripts I decided to write one to simplify it now:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[The user script can be obtained here][1], [the source here][2],  &#xD;&#xA;it works for both Google Chrome and Firefox, also written to work on any (beta) SE site...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This adds a link &quot;Show Related.&quot; at the top of the bar on the right side,  &#xD;&#xA;that links function serves as a toggle to show and hide the related questions above the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please note that the related question is only fetched when clicking that link, so don't excessively click it...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://tom.hsc.be/meta/related.user.js&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://tom.hsc.be/meta/related.user.txt" />
  <row Id="2727" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1381" RevisionGUID="6d24eef0-fa3f-4aba-8998-08ad37a93c09" CreationDate="2010-09-05T08:52:12.913" UserId="3981" Text="Due to the legal gray area that exists with regards to building or running Hackintosh machines we have always discouraged these question on SU since it would attract unnecessary attention to the site to avoid any issues going forward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could we please add the &lt;kbd&gt;[hackintosh]&lt;/kbd&gt; tag the list of banned tags for the site." />
  <row Id="2728" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1381" RevisionGUID="6d24eef0-fa3f-4aba-8998-08ad37a93c09" CreationDate="2010-09-05T08:52:12.913" UserId="3981" Text="Banned Tag Proposal: Hackintosh" />
  <row Id="2729" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1381" RevisionGUID="6d24eef0-fa3f-4aba-8998-08ad37a93c09" CreationDate="2010-09-05T08:52:12.913" UserId="3981" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;tag&gt;&lt;tag-ban&gt;" />
  <row Id="2730" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1381" RevisionGUID="af5b5f81-2995-4cc6-9b4c-d6cb02801113" CreationDate="2010-09-05T09:06:03.243" UserId="3981" Comment="added 180 characters in body" Text="Due to the legal gray area that exists with regards to building or running Hackintosh machines we have always discouraged these question on SU since it would attract unnecessary attention to the site to avoid any issues going forward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also every time someone posts a Hackintosh question they either get down voted into oblivion or a 15 comment this is not legal battle ensues, and should be avoided if possible.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Could we please add the &lt;kbd&gt;[hackintosh]&lt;/kbd&gt; tag the list of banned tags for the site." />
  <row Id="2731" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1382" RevisionGUID="69be1239-24fb-45a7-bc6a-60d80567fda5" CreationDate="2010-09-05T11:16:16.860" UserId="30462" Text="My e-mail, at least on super user is not loger considered valid. It contains 10 letters after which is 1 number, at symbol (@) and gmail.com. It was considered valid before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea why does it happen?" />
  <row Id="2732" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1382" RevisionGUID="69be1239-24fb-45a7-bc6a-60d80567fda5" CreationDate="2010-09-05T11:16:16.860" UserId="30462" Text="My e-mail is not considered valid" />
  <row Id="2733" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1382" RevisionGUID="69be1239-24fb-45a7-bc6a-60d80567fda5" CreationDate="2010-09-05T11:16:16.860" UserId="30462" Text="&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="2734" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1382" RevisionGUID="ae48e5cc-227a-44db-a200-a5734fed848d" CreationDate="2010-09-05T11:35:44.587" UserId="3981" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="My email, at least on super user is not loger considered valid. It contains 10 letters after which is 1 number, at symbol (@) and gmail.com. It was considered valid before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea why does it happen?" />
  <row Id="2735" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1382" RevisionGUID="ae48e5cc-227a-44db-a200-a5734fed848d" CreationDate="2010-09-05T11:35:44.587" UserId="3981" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body; edited title" Text="My email is not considered valid" />
  <row Id="2736" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1382" RevisionGUID="15292e8b-7598-45f7-ae9f-b30ad472c6ca" CreationDate="2010-09-05T11:47:45.103" UserId="30462" Comment="added 423 characters in body" Text="My email, at least on super user is not loger considered valid. It contains 10 letters after which is 1 number, at symbol (@) and gmail.com. It was considered valid before.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any idea why does it happen?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT**: I get the message when I post new question (like [this one][1]). However afterwards I did not receive any error when I simply marked checkbox after posting question.&#xD;&#xA;The error was reproducable in sense that after rechecking box after error it was reported again. I haven't change the email and it was fetched from database.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/184926/winrm-what-it-is-and-how-to-use-it" />
  <row Id="2737" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1383" RevisionGUID="52d17e59-4237-4154-8911-9aac6e7af8e8" CreationDate="2010-09-05T17:49:50.973" UserId="2855" Text="In the 10k tools &quot;flagged&quot; posts tab: Once it is selected, no other tools tabs appear. This requires the user to use the browser back button or click tools again. No other 10k tools tabs exhibit this behavior.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This happens in Firefox 3.6.8 and IE8 on Windows 7 for me." />
  <row Id="2738" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1383" RevisionGUID="52d17e59-4237-4154-8911-9aac6e7af8e8" CreationDate="2010-09-05T17:49:50.973" UserId="2855" Text="10K Tools &quot;flag&quot; tab issue in revision: 2010.9.5.3" />
  <row Id="2739" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1383" RevisionGUID="52d17e59-4237-4154-8911-9aac6e7af8e8" CreationDate="2010-09-05T17:49:50.973" UserId="2855" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;10k&gt;" />
  <row Id="2740" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1384" RevisionGUID="5beb08e2-5e9d-450c-9037-92d56df4a7bf" CreationDate="2010-09-05T18:03:30.647" UserId="3981" Text="This is not a bug, it's by design.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The flags page is shared between the tools and moderation pages and therefore has no navigation apart from the top bar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Source](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/30336/tabs-missing-for-flags-page-in-the-tools-section)" />
  <row Id="2741" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1383" RevisionGUID="27e3a183-d7f7-4a33-93f5-2239d4c7c1ea" CreationDate="2010-09-05T18:03:45.717" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;10k&gt;" />
  <row Id="2742" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1385" RevisionGUID="4cd81868-9b03-44df-aeff-41eff47e2ea2" CreationDate="2010-09-05T21:39:25.297" UserId="1548" Text="I already closed these on sight, so you've got my vote" />
  <row Id="2743" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1379" RevisionGUID="94d8bdd6-c802-4fd4-80db-f688ddf559c5" CreationDate="2010-09-05T21:42:37.520" UserId="34844" Comment="added 8 characters in body" Text="When one opens a question and starts typing a title, a list of possible duplicate questions is shown as illustrated below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I assume that this isn't used often since some quite obvious duplicates are still created on Super User. Perhaps a &quot;I checked the list and it wasn't there&quot; checkbox could be added to solve this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover however, I'd like to be able to fetch this list when viewing an existing question. I think it'd allow the higher rep users to locate and assign duplicates faster and more efficient. Checking for duplicates now consists of searching a duplicate while this would be much quicker.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example: Add a link (Find possible duplicates) next to &quot;close&quot; and &quot;edit&quot; that will open an overlay div (Like the closing reasons div) and display the same list as above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/GEWsk.png" />
  <row Id="2744" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1369" RevisionGUID="266f458d-bffd-4691-9f83-9ac1793a58cc" CreationDate="2010-09-05T22:05:39.893" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;editing&gt;&lt;blacklist&gt;" />
  <row Id="2745" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1370" RevisionGUID="7f37fccd-73be-4609-8316-8e243e1c517e" CreationDate="2010-09-05T22:11:53.337" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags; added 5 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;editing&gt;&lt;blacklist&gt;" />
  <row Id="2746" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1370" RevisionGUID="7f37fccd-73be-4609-8316-8e243e1c517e" CreationDate="2010-09-05T22:11:53.337" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags; added 5 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; [What content am I being blocked from editing and why?](http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1369/what-content-am-i-being-blocked-from-editing-and-why)  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Was trying to edit the following question to fix the broken URL:  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/184171/how-to-extend-partition&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Upon submitting I get the following error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Oops! Your edit couldn't be submitted because:  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  * Sorry, posts can't contain that content.   &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  * Sorry, post titles can't contain that content. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I literally just fixed the URL and added tick marks around &quot;C:&quot;, and the error message doesn't make it clear **what** &quot;that&quot; content is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What happened? / What did I do wrong? / Something broken?" />
  <row Id="2747" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1386" RevisionGUID="cca0c52f-b3c8-4c8e-ba7d-4d5eae80eabb" CreationDate="2010-09-06T01:23:49.027" UserId="296" Text="From what I can tell, the system is giving you the badge due to this: http://superuser.com/posts/58514/revisions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However it was created earlier here: http://superuser.com/questions/40529" />
  <row Id="2748" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1386" RevisionGUID="4cfcd89d-e336-4ee2-9e69-6ece0b4a1a2e" CreationDate="2010-09-06T02:23:04.960" UserId="296" Comment="added 168 characters in body" Text="From what I can tell, the system is giving you the badge due to this: http://superuser.com/posts/58514/revisions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However it was created earlier here: http://superuser.com/questions/40529&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This was due to a bug/missing feature in earlier versions of our codebase where the tag creator was not properly tracked in the Tags table when posting a question. " />
  <row Id="2749" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1379" RevisionGUID="3fe0b079-903b-4be2-97ad-7c4930a6017f" CreationDate="2010-09-06T06:47:16.243" UserId="20088" Comment="Added another situation in which this would be useful" Text="When one opens a question and starts typing a title, a list of possible duplicate questions is shown as illustrated below.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I assume that this isn't used often since some quite obvious duplicates are still created on Super User. Perhaps a &quot;I checked the list and it wasn't there&quot; checkbox could be added to solve this.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Moreover however, I'd like to be able to fetch this list when viewing an existing question. I think it'd allow the higher rep users to locate and assign duplicates faster and more efficient. Checking for duplicates now consists of searching a duplicate while this would be much quicker. Furthermore, it might decrease situations where users answer a question without realizing that it already exists and thereby encouraging duplicate questions, which has been discussed at length [here][2].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example: Add a link (Find possible duplicates) next to &quot;close&quot; and &quot;edit&quot; that will open an overlay div (Like the closing reasons div) and display the same list as above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/GEWsk.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.superuser.com/questions/787/high-reputation-users-having-trouble-understanding-super-user" />
  <row Id="2750" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1377" RevisionGUID="90023953-2323-4cc2-af9f-1d8c0b43a789" CreationDate="2010-09-06T07:29:08.357" UserId="3981" Comment="added 75 characters in body" Text="No it's not. I could refer to the data on my drive, the data in memory or various other meanings.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I **do not** consider it to be a meta tag. It is valid within the context of using a computer. Meta tags indicate something outside of the norm, like for example beginner or learning.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Jeff has since deleted the tag and agrees it is a meta tag." />
  <row Id="2751" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1387" RevisionGUID="581bd970-84d6-41e1-975c-c6dcbf2dd7ad" CreationDate="2010-09-06T22:40:55.410" UserId="1" Text="This post is to document the **week 2** winners of the [Super User Super Contest][contest], for the week ending **Monday, September 6**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Congratulations to our winners this week!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [Best rookie][suleague] performance by [**Shogun**][rookie]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![best rookie performance week of 08-30-2010][rookiepic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. [Highest reputation][suleague] produced by [**KronoS**][toprep]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![top users week of 08-30-2010][topreppic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Best meta post:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [New Users—Cutting Slack?][bestmeta] answer by [**DMA57361**][bestmetauser]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Most awesome new question or answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [tool to find out which video card is installed on my system?][bestweek] answer by [**Wil**][bestweekuser]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are contacting the winners now, so be sure to check your email inboxes!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[contest]:      http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/super-user-1-year-anniversary-super-contest/&#xD;&#xA;[suleague]:     http://stackexchange.com/leagues/3/week/superuser/2010-08-30&#xD;&#xA;[rookiepic]:    http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/6140/topnewusers.png&#xD;&#xA;[topreppic]:    http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/1790/toprepusers.png&#xD;&#xA;[bestweek]:     http://superuser.com/questions/184803/tool-to-find-out-which-video-card-is-installed-on-my-system/184804#184804&#xD;&#xA;[bestweekuser]: http://superuser.com/users/4386/wil&#xD;&#xA;[bestmeta]:     http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1350/new-userscutting-slack/1351#1351&#xD;&#xA;[bestmetauser]: http://meta.superuser.com/users/39366/dma57361&#xD;&#xA;[rookie]:       http://superuser.com/users/48219/shogun&#xD;&#xA;[toprep]:       http://superuser.com/users/47225/kronos" />
  <row Id="2752" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1387" RevisionGUID="581bd970-84d6-41e1-975c-c6dcbf2dd7ad" CreationDate="2010-09-06T22:40:55.410" UserId="1" Text="Super Contest Winners: Week 2" />
  <row Id="2753" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1387" RevisionGUID="581bd970-84d6-41e1-975c-c6dcbf2dd7ad" CreationDate="2010-09-06T22:40:55.410" UserId="1" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;super-contest&gt;" />
  <row Id="2754" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1387" RevisionGUID="77f1cf66-faf1-4062-9254-7445368f3407" CreationDate="2010-09-06T23:07:37.630" UserId="1" Comment="added 182 characters in body" Text="This post is to document the **week 2** winners of the [Super User Super Contest][contest], for the week ending **Monday, September 6**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Congratulations to our winners this week!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [Best rookie][suleague] performance by [**Shogun**][rookie] and [**pattern86**][rookie2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![best rookie performance week of 08-30-2010][rookiepic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   (special exception this week, since both new users were worthy -- both get the prize!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. [Highest reputation][suleague] produced by [**KronoS**][toprep]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![top users week of 08-30-2010][topreppic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Best meta post:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [New Users—Cutting Slack?][bestmeta] answer by [**DMA57361**][bestmetauser]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Most awesome new question or answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [tool to find out which video card is installed on my system?][bestweek] answer by [**Wil**][bestweekuser]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are contacting the winners now, so be sure to check your email inboxes!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[contest]:      http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/super-user-1-year-anniversary-super-contest/&#xD;&#xA;[suleague]:     http://stackexchange.com/leagues/3/week/superuser/2010-08-30&#xD;&#xA;[rookiepic]:    http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/6140/topnewusers.png&#xD;&#xA;[topreppic]:    http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/1790/toprepusers.png&#xD;&#xA;[bestweek]:     http://superuser.com/questions/184803/tool-to-find-out-which-video-card-is-installed-on-my-system/184804#184804&#xD;&#xA;[bestweekuser]: http://superuser.com/users/4386/wil&#xD;&#xA;[bestmeta]:     http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1350/new-userscutting-slack/1351#1351&#xD;&#xA;[bestmetauser]: http://meta.superuser.com/users/39366/dma57361&#xD;&#xA;[rookie]:       http://superuser.com/users/48219/shogun&#xD;&#xA;[rookie2]:      http://superuser.com/users/48154/pattern86&#xD;&#xA;[toprep]:       http://superuser.com/users/47225/kronos" />
  <row Id="2755" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1388" RevisionGUID="35427f81-ab59-4ad0-9ac2-9895c590e096" CreationDate="2010-09-07T03:08:31.747" UserId="4377" Text="Congrats to the winners :D" />
  <row Id="2756" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1389" RevisionGUID="852c5072-3275-4fec-a790-e8a053654024" CreationDate="2010-09-07T18:04:03.113" UserId="48219" Text="I accidentally plugged my mouse in wrong, and won a contest: http://superuser.com/questions/183543/i-accidentally-plugged-my-usb-mouse-into-my-esata-port-it-works Cool right? Thanks SuperUser!" />
  <row Id="2757" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="814" RevisionGUID="5cf84198-33b6-41bc-b2fe-f32e82c1684b" CreationDate="2010-09-08T10:11:36.643" UserId="517" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="This is a purely language issue, but IMHO, it deserves some thought.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't know how things currently stand on Stack Overflow and Server Fault, but on Super User questions often get closed as *&lt;b&gt;non computer related&lt;/b&gt;*, for which the description stands, and I quote:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Questions on Super User are expected to generally relate to computer software or computer hardware in some way. This question is very far afield from software or hardware.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, the FAQ clearly states that Super User is not about:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- videogames or consoles  &#xD;&#xA;- websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress  &#xD;&#xA;- cellphones or mobile devices, except smartphones such as iPhone that interface with your computer  &#xD;&#xA;- electronic devices or media players, except insofar as they interface with your computer  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But it is about:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- computer hardware  &#xD;&#xA;- computer software  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Websites related questions (Gmail, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) often get closed on that basis. I just checked on Wikipedia - they are certainly software.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now, I wouldn't mind a simple statement saying, &quot;Closed for not being in the scope of this site&quot;, but closing them as not being software or hardware related, or worse, not being computer related is plain silly. **Should that reason for closing be renamed to something more sensible?**&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2758" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1390" RevisionGUID="10417506-516a-4d8e-acd0-b9e0db3abd40" CreationDate="2010-09-08T16:51:33.930" UserId="4377" Text="Can any of the mods please do a rep recalc on my account ? There's a rep difference of about 500 points between the rep on my current profile and the `/reputation` report, and I'd rather get it down now than have it climb to about 1000 points or so." />
  <row Id="2759" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1390" RevisionGUID="10417506-516a-4d8e-acd0-b9e0db3abd40" CreationDate="2010-09-08T16:51:33.930" UserId="4377" Text="Requesting rep recalc" />
  <row Id="2760" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1390" RevisionGUID="10417506-516a-4d8e-acd0-b9e0db3abd40" CreationDate="2010-09-08T16:51:33.930" UserId="4377" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;rep-recalc&gt;" />
  <row Id="2761" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1391" RevisionGUID="9f4bf3d0-3900-4550-9f78-a893ca19c60b" CreationDate="2010-09-08T16:56:13.437" UserId="3981" Text="Done. Recalculated." />
  <row Id="2762" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1390" RevisionGUID="e105f304-19fb-4026-826b-38c27c88daa8" CreationDate="2010-09-08T16:56:26.663" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;rep-recalc&gt;" />
  <row Id="2763" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1392" RevisionGUID="160d61e0-ec0f-4566-af3a-144305923ce0" CreationDate="2010-09-08T18:32:28.280" UserId="39366" Text="I ended up [here][1] because it was in the related links [of a new question][2]. The original version made be pull a face, so I've adjusted it. However, given it has been accepted and unedited for about 7 months, is this appropriate? *[Notice that someone has posted a new comment on the question because I've bumped it with my edit, for example]*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm inclined to say the answer is **yes**, as long as it improves the site, but I would like some wider community confirmation please. Are there any cases where it is instead right to leave old posts alone, even if they can be improved?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not, I should say, intending to go trawling for old posts to fix...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://superuser.com/questions/95204/what-parts-i-need-to-assemble-my-own-computer&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://superuser.com/questions/186239/are-laptops-assembled-by-hand" />
  <row Id="2764" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1392" RevisionGUID="160d61e0-ec0f-4566-af3a-144305923ce0" CreationDate="2010-09-08T18:32:28.280" UserId="39366" Text="Is it appropriate to edit &quot;very&quot; old posts?" />
  <row Id="2765" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1392" RevisionGUID="160d61e0-ec0f-4566-af3a-144305923ce0" CreationDate="2010-09-08T18:32:28.280" UserId="39366" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;editing&gt;" />
  <row Id="2766" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1392" RevisionGUID="1d716837-faa6-4f53-90b6-4460b2c3af79" CreationDate="2010-09-08T18:39:06.140" UserId="39366" Comment="added 46 characters in body" Text="I ended up [here][1] because it was in the related links [of a new question][2]. The original version made be pull a face, so I've adjusted it. However, given it has been accepted and unedited for about 7 months, is this appropriate?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm inclined to say the answer is **yes**, as long as it improves the site, but I would like some wider community confirmation please. Are there any cases where it is instead right to leave old posts alone, even if they can be improved?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Notice that someone has posted a new comment on the question because I've bumped it with my edit, for example. So are there any other potential issues here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not, I should say, intending to go trawling for old posts to fix...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://superuser.com/questions/95204/what-parts-i-need-to-assemble-my-own-computer&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://superuser.com/questions/186239/are-laptops-assembled-by-hand" />
  <row Id="2767" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1393" RevisionGUID="8e3a238f-995b-41b0-b1d9-4e7852ee28a1" CreationDate="2010-09-08T19:06:30.427" UserId="43645" Text="This is related to [this question][1] from Diago last year.  I have seen a lot of answers with either a link only, or a link with a short description copy/pasted from the developer's website.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Personally I think this is a bad practice, as it gives the Asker the impression that the person posting the answer has used the product and is endorsing when they likely have not actually used it and just found it via a Google search.  If they had used it why would they not post their own quick writeup?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question is, is it OK to downvote these answers?  As a followup, if it is OK, what should we do about users who repeatedly do this?  I have seen a couple the past few weeks that seem to make a habit of it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.superuser.com/questions/500/is-downvoting-link-only-answers-acceptable" />
  <row Id="2768" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1393" RevisionGUID="8e3a238f-995b-41b0-b1d9-4e7852ee28a1" CreationDate="2010-09-08T19:06:30.427" UserId="43645" Text="Is it OK to downvote link only or link/copy/paste answers?" />
  <row Id="2769" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1393" RevisionGUID="8e3a238f-995b-41b0-b1d9-4e7852ee28a1" CreationDate="2010-09-08T19:06:30.427" UserId="43645" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;answers&gt;&lt;down-votes&gt;&lt;hyperlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="2770" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1394" RevisionGUID="c3fcd343-926b-4952-90a7-6f234ede6d3b" CreationDate="2010-09-08T19:18:43.847" UserId="34844" Text="If you leave the meaning of the question as it is, then yes. If a question can be improved, then please do so as it will make searching easier for people that come here to look for answers. Of course, do mind the etiquette of editing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Sometimes, questions are very old and about obsolete software or hardware. In that case, for example, do mind you're not making an Windows XP question about Windows 7 just because it deals with a seemingly similar problem in MS Word." />
  <row Id="2771" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1395" RevisionGUID="949b1dcc-4232-4ab9-b0a0-79c6b5ca3d26" CreationDate="2010-09-08T19:24:55.547" UserId="34844" Text="Although I confess I do this occasionally, I do think it's bad practice to blindly copy and paste a dscription. However, I only recommend software I have actually used and if I haven't, I'll always mention this in my answer. The point is that pre-written descriptions are usually written to tell the (potentially new) user of the product much about the product's features with as little text as possible. I just see no reason why to reinvent the wheel and write yourself a similar description when you agree to what it says.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So no, I don't think this is a reason to downvote the answer. I think as more useful answers are submitted, those that aren't useful at all will submerge in upvoted answers thus solving the problem." />
  <row Id="2772" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1395" RevisionGUID="99aab244-2521-41db-93ee-269a99ffc294" CreationDate="2010-09-08T19:33:27.977" UserId="34844" Comment="added 154 characters in body; added 199 characters in body" Text="Although I confess I do this occasionally, I do think it's bad practice to blindly copy and paste a dscription. However, I only recommend software I have actually used and if I haven't, I'll always mention this in my answer. The point is that pre-written descriptions are usually written to tell the (potentially new) user of the product much about the product's features with as little text as possible. I just see no reason why to reinvent the wheel and write yourself a similar description when you agree to what it says.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So no, I don't think this is a reason to downvote the answer. I think as more useful answers are submitted, those that aren't useful at all will submerge in upvoted answers thus solving the problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course, downvoting answers that only contain the ad quoted (statements without proper arguments like &quot;It's the best, just because it is&quot;) would be proper. However if a quote contains proper arguments like &quot;It's the best because independent consumer survey pointed out that 90% of the users are more than satisfied&quot; I see no reason to downvote it." />
  <row Id="2773" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1396" RevisionGUID="58f130c0-a266-4558-976b-1b142d2b994f" CreationDate="2010-09-08T19:41:47.737" UserId="1339" Text="To add to BloodPhilia's answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm of the belief that yes it is worth down voting link only (or generally very poor quality) answers (and leave a comment of the sort saying just links aren't helpful). The answers are not useful because they are dependent on an external link and add very little to the site. Adding the summary and crediting your sources however is a good way of answering.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When it comes to copying and pasting - it depends on how much and what is being said. I don't upvote answers where it's obvious it's a copy and paste job, it's like rewarding plagiarism (and there are lots of instances where copy and paste is fine; eg. instructions)." />
  <row Id="2774" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1397" RevisionGUID="7f21b03c-7d8f-4f82-be66-d7c23546a434" CreationDate="2010-09-09T01:45:58.167" UserId="36565" Text="http://superuser.com/questions/16972/what-single-piece-of-software-do-you-most-admire-and-why/16990#16990&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If my math is correct, (and I hope it is), if there are 3 people, each with one revision, then `(1 / 3) * 100 = 33.333...%`, not `36%`. I guess it's not a huge problem, but a bug nonetheless." />
  <row Id="2775" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1397" RevisionGUID="7f21b03c-7d8f-4f82-be66-d7c23546a434" CreationDate="2010-09-09T01:45:58.167" UserId="36565" Text="Yet another Community Wiki oddity" />
  <row Id="2776" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1397" RevisionGUID="7f21b03c-7d8f-4f82-be66-d7c23546a434" CreationDate="2010-09-09T01:45:58.167" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="2777" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1398" RevisionGUID="be53406f-fa0e-4822-8038-73bec35dead5" CreationDate="2010-09-09T01:56:32.270" UserId="307" Text="There's a style to how you should interpret the numbers on a community wiki post.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 3 revs, 2 users 36%  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; T Pops&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There have been three revisions to the post. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of those, they were made by two users in total (the first user in this case is excluded, having been deleted). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of those, 36% of the bulk of editing/revisions has been done by the user T Pops." />
  <row Id="2778" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1397" RevisionGUID="36dcda11-b531-4b20-a778-3d501ad33ba6" CreationDate="2010-09-09T01:57:46.793" UserId="307" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="2779" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1399" RevisionGUID="001b3dcd-bc2f-4fa6-b68a-225f099e6250" CreationDate="2010-09-09T06:32:24.797" UserId="48851" Text="Hi,&#xD;&#xA;i got the critis badge in stackoverflow. it said it is for down voting. i did not down vote any answers. i accidentally voted and again revoked. How to fine which post i have down voted if i had accidentally done that.? Where should i ask such quesitons as this is for superuser i know this is an inappropriate question here. So please move to the specific site and i will follow it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides if this question needs to be deleted then its ok but i want to know the answer." />
  <row Id="2780" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1399" RevisionGUID="001b3dcd-bc2f-4fa6-b68a-225f099e6250" CreationDate="2010-09-09T06:32:24.797" UserId="48851" Text="what is the critics badge? i did not down vote any." />
  <row Id="2781" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1399" RevisionGUID="001b3dcd-bc2f-4fa6-b68a-225f099e6250" CreationDate="2010-09-09T06:32:24.797" UserId="48851" Text="&lt;user-interface&gt;" />
  <row Id="2782" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1399" RevisionGUID="2fdfaac3-89f2-4c42-b053-8d7fc4e80e74" CreationDate="2010-09-09T07:09:58.410" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/186423/what-is-the-critics-badge-i-did-not-down-vote-any" Text="" />
  <row Id="2783" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1400" RevisionGUID="0700de76-6501-4a69-ba2a-926107c1a6ac" CreationDate="2010-09-09T08:14:57.873" UserId="1548" Text="Actually this question should have been asked on Meta.StackOverflow.com, but don't worry, it can stay here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you (accidently) downvoted a post, you won't be able to revert it unless the post is edited. But really, it's not the end of the world, though you could leave a comment to apologize. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, since we don't have access to your voting pattern, we can't tell you were you did it. So my advice: enjoy the rest of the day and to up your karma: upvote every good question or answer you see!" />
  <row Id="2784" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1373" RevisionGUID="40b4804e-32bf-49c3-8240-a7802db35c23" CreationDate="2010-09-09T10:42:00.957" UserId="39559" Comment="added 129 characters in body; edited tags" Text="I just posted my first question on SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First attempt was vetted as it lacked tags. I understood: better not make a question without tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second attempt with tags: I went through this particularly tough captcha procedure and only after that it my question was vetted as it had too many tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Third attempt, I removed one tag, submitted the question, and realized that SU does not yet believe that I am a Human and gave me a new captcha :-(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it the way it is supposed to be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why not reject my question for excess of tags before thowing the captcha, as it did when it rejected my question for lack of tags?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can think of two reasonable scenaria: (i) I am only asked to prove that I am a human in the very last step before my actions are going to produce some effect on the site and generate a new question/answer/comment/whatever; (ii) I am not re-asked to prove that I am Human before I effectively make quite a few question/answer/comment/whatever." />
  <row Id="2785" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1373" RevisionGUID="40b4804e-32bf-49c3-8240-a7802db35c23" CreationDate="2010-09-09T10:42:00.957" UserId="39559" Comment="added 129 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;user-interface&gt;&lt;interface&gt;&lt;re-captcha&gt;" />
  <row Id="2786" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1374" RevisionGUID="6beddcdd-d08f-418c-931e-9b0cda4ee0e5" CreationDate="2010-09-09T11:00:39.947" UserId="39366" Comment="deleted 7 characters in body" Text="Questions require 1-5 tags - no more, no less.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think it makes sense for the *question* validation to be before the *user* validation - check the tag's etc before going with the captcha. Maybe there's a design choice in there somewhere we don't know about.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I occasionaly get hit by (multiple) captchas whenever I do a quick re-edit (or three) on my new posts to pick up spelling / grammer / flow / etc. I guess you triggered one by exhibiting &quot;odd&quot; question posting behaviour. However, **this makes sense**, otherwise someone with a bot would just manually answer the first captcha and switch thier bot on - multiple checks *are* needed to prevent this." />
  <row Id="2787" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1401" RevisionGUID="3d7e9fb4-6a4c-4a73-ad0c-6bdeb99f85e5" CreationDate="2010-09-09T11:19:36.530" UserId="1548" Text="If I'm trying to answer a question and I see a 'competing' answer already linked the solution I was planning on suggesting, I edit his answer to add the info I think should be included.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why? Because I don't want to go duplicating answers, because technically his answer might be correct. Now I understand that not everyone has the ability to edit every post, but if you can I personally recommend it. (Leave a comment as to why you did it though!)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My experience is that afterwards, the answer is better rewarded by others, so the user will hopefully notice that adding value to his answers is worth the effort!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would only consider downvoting when the answer is wrong, not just incomplete or above answers you think are much better. But generally, I don't think your downvotes will lead to better answers, so why bother?" />
  <row Id="2788" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1373" RevisionGUID="60c750d7-23f9-4f86-b702-09f7a8c5cedb" CreationDate="2010-09-09T11:25:23.180" UserId="39559" Comment="added 27 characters in body" Text="I just posted my first question on SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First attempt was vetted as it lacked tags. I understood: better not make a question without tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Second attempt with tags: I went through this particularly tough captcha procedure and only after that it my question was vetted as it had too many tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Third attempt, I removed one tag, submitted the question, and realized that SU does not yet believe that I am a Human and gave me a new captcha :-(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is it the way it is supposed to be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why not reject my question for excess of tags before throwing the captcha, just as it did when it rejected my question for lack of tags?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*&lt;strike&gt;I can think of two reasonable scenaria: (i) I am only asked to prove that I am a human in the very last step before my actions are going to produce some effect on the site and generate a new question/answer/comment/whatever; (ii) I am not re-asked to prove that I am Human before I effectively make quite a few question/answer/comment/whatever.&lt;/strike&gt;*" />
  <row Id="2789" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1399" RevisionGUID="92083533-ba05-41df-a0df-f58b985efda0" CreationDate="2010-09-09T12:26:50.617" UserId="4377" Comment="edited tags; added 2 characters in body" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;down-votes&gt;" />
  <row Id="2790" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1399" RevisionGUID="92083533-ba05-41df-a0df-f58b985efda0" CreationDate="2010-09-09T12:26:50.617" UserId="4377" Comment="edited tags; added 2 characters in body" Text="Hi,&#xD;&#xA; I got the Critic badge in Stack Overflow. It said it is for down voting. i did not down vote any answers. i accidentally voted and again revoked. How to fine which post i have down voted if i had accidentally done that.? Where should i ask such quesitons as this is for superuser i know this is an inappropriate question here. So please move to the specific site and i will follow it. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides if this question needs to be deleted then its ok but i want to know the answer." />
  <row Id="2791" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1402" RevisionGUID="eba561af-7f53-4f27-983f-2f752796b877" CreationDate="2010-09-09T12:50:32.997" UserId="39559" Text="You can undo a vote, but after a minute or so you can't any more.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe you downvoted by accident and reverted, and you got a badge for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have the Critics badge in SuperUser Meta for this reason, I got it by accident, but my downvote withdrawal was done." />
  <row Id="2792" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1403" RevisionGUID="0188e943-dba5-4749-b6b0-8f0b14426f1c" CreationDate="2010-09-09T13:35:55.677" UserId="39366" Text="Just a nosey thought while I'm edging towards the 3k mark.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How many of the &quot;top&quot; users are still active on the site?  &#xD;&#xA;How many of have climbed to the heady heights of the 3k mark, to only then (at some point) leave the site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact, while I'm asking, what's the retention rate like accross the entire rep spectrum?  " />
  <row Id="2793" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1403" RevisionGUID="0188e943-dba5-4749-b6b0-8f0b14426f1c" CreationDate="2010-09-09T13:35:55.677" UserId="39366" Text="How many of the &quot;top&quot; users (by rep) are still active?" />
  <row Id="2794" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1403" RevisionGUID="0188e943-dba5-4749-b6b0-8f0b14426f1c" CreationDate="2010-09-09T13:35:55.677" UserId="39366" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="2795" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1404" RevisionGUID="c4f701e8-378d-46ef-bba5-c977a2cab539" CreationDate="2010-09-09T14:41:47.877" UserId="4377" Text="Barring one or two people, all of them are very much active. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This [Data Explorer query][1] confirms it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://odata.stackexchange.com/superuser/s/502/list-of-users-with-rep-3000-and-their-last-accessed-dates" />
  <row Id="2796" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1405" RevisionGUID="3a58780b-e69c-44b2-8709-1fa2c0a7669f" CreationDate="2010-09-09T22:40:43.410" UserId="34844" Text="Might be a silly question, but I'm wondering, when do you consider a user a high rep user? Has the user to be in the top 10?/50? or does he need 10000+ rep, etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Just being curious..." />
  <row Id="2797" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1405" RevisionGUID="3a58780b-e69c-44b2-8709-1fa2c0a7669f" CreationDate="2010-09-09T22:40:43.410" UserId="34844" Text="When are you a high rep user?" />
  <row Id="2798" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1405" RevisionGUID="3a58780b-e69c-44b2-8709-1fa2c0a7669f" CreationDate="2010-09-09T22:40:43.410" UserId="34844" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="2799" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1406" RevisionGUID="5ca4fdd6-25ae-4c3b-9b63-8e3ce6894e64" CreationDate="2010-09-09T23:46:06.707" UserId="2553" Text="There is not really a defined &quot;greater than X reputation = high rep user.&quot;  If a username is in the top one or two pages of SU users, then they are usually higher reputation users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is also relative to each site and the time it has been active.  SO for example has 17k rep users on page 10 of the Users rankings. There are only 4 users currently that have &gt; 17k rep on SU for comparison." />
  <row Id="2800" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1407" RevisionGUID="a2e66aa7-98bb-4130-9fd8-1bc2e349072d" CreationDate="2010-09-10T08:03:45.757" UserId="39366" Text="I'd like to add one more criterion to the conversation, so that a &quot;high rep&quot; user is anyone who:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Meets some expected rep score / percentile / ranking / etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Makes use of **all** their &quot;powers&quot;, and does so correctly.  &#xD;&#xA;(ie, doesn't just use the basic &quot;low-level&quot; &quot;powers&quot;, but *actively* acts as a high rep user)." />
  <row Id="2801" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1406" RevisionGUID="1509f063-a1ed-47f6-aed2-85c039ea98ab" CreationDate="2010-09-10T09:09:57.470" UserId="2553" Comment="added 346 characters in body" Text="There is not really a defined &quot;greater than X reputation = high rep user.&quot;  If a username is in the top one or two pages of SU users, then they are usually higher reputation users.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is also relative to each site and the time it has been active.  SO for example has 17k rep users on page 10 of the Users rankings. There are only 4 users currently that have &gt; 17k rep on SU for comparison.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;EDIT:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I like what DMA57361 was mentioning there in his second point.  Any user that uses the new abilities given to them at certain rep levels and uses them to advance and improve the site would be ideal.  Super User can always use more people to help edit and improve questions throughout the site.  Of course, we need great answers also." />
  <row Id="2802" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1407" RevisionGUID="b31831d1-1e89-47be-a84d-dd474ae4d16d" CreationDate="2010-09-10T11:43:44.037" UserId="39366" Comment="added 130 characters in body" Text="![The question owner (didn't really) accept this answer as the best at some point][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'd like to add one more criterion to the conversation, so that a &quot;high rep&quot; user is anyone who:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Meets some expected rep score / percentile / ranking / etc.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. Makes use of **all** their &quot;powers&quot;, and does so correctly.  &#xD;&#xA;(ie, doesn't just use the basic &quot;low-level&quot; &quot;powers&quot;, but *actively* acts as a high rep user).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/cCrdn.png" />
  <row Id="2803" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1408" RevisionGUID="3cd8de09-287e-446f-bf2e-dfd310bac1e6" CreationDate="2010-09-10T14:59:06.843" UserId="26960" Text="I had a short email with Diago regarding stats on SU. He suggested me to write my question here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I would like to see my personal stats on SU. I mean by that, how many entried I've edited, on how many questions I've upvote. This is to compare on how many votes, editions or anything I miss to get a new badge by example...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Diago sent me this link: http://odata.stackexchange.com/ but I only see an xml file...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope my question was clear enough!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kind regards,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;David." />
  <row Id="2804" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1408" RevisionGUID="3cd8de09-287e-446f-bf2e-dfd310bac1e6" CreationDate="2010-09-10T14:59:06.843" UserId="26960" Text="How to see personal stats on SU." />
  <row Id="2805" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1408" RevisionGUID="3cd8de09-287e-446f-bf2e-dfd310bac1e6" CreationDate="2010-09-10T14:59:06.843" UserId="26960" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2806" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1409" RevisionGUID="9774d737-03c5-4232-99ec-2e7b2c9592d0" CreationDate="2010-09-10T15:18:53.377" UserId="4377" Text="Some of the basic stats are already on your [user profile page][1]. If you want some more stats - and if you have some knowledge of SQL - then you can use the [Data Explorer][2] find out. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;There are some [pretty good queries][3] that have been composed by users. Else you can probably post a new question asking for what is it that you want, and we could probably write the relevant query and help you out.&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/26960/r0ca&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://odata.stackexchange.com/superuser/queries&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://odata.stackexchange.com/superuser/queries?order_by=featured" />
  <row Id="2807" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1410" RevisionGUID="c2d2af37-6e4f-4656-8150-0be1081f6f7f" CreationDate="2010-09-10T15:34:03.637" UserId="43645" Text="Is  there a fast way for someone with 3k+ rep to find questions nominated for closing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there's not, can we make one?  I think this would prevent a lot of redundant effort, i.e. 5 different highish rep users having to find a duplicate question, or happen to read a question and notice that it has been nominated for closing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A workaround(hack?) for this would be a tag that the nominating user puts on a question, which would allow easy scanning.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think we could get a lot more questions closed and cleaned if there were an easy list to check often, and see what other users have nominated for closure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I apologize if one exists that I don't know about!" />
  <row Id="2808" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1410" RevisionGUID="c2d2af37-6e4f-4656-8150-0be1081f6f7f" CreationDate="2010-09-10T15:34:03.637" UserId="43645" Text="Quick way to find questions nominated for closing?" />
  <row Id="2809" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1410" RevisionGUID="c2d2af37-6e4f-4656-8150-0be1081f6f7f" CreationDate="2010-09-10T15:34:03.637" UserId="43645" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;&lt;duplicates&gt;&lt;vote-to-close&gt;" />
  <row Id="2810" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1411" RevisionGUID="e7c93731-32a6-4527-a8ff-30b957c1a72d" CreationDate="2010-09-10T15:38:04.160" UserId="47225" Text="I'm just wanting some clarity of why this [question](http://superuser.com/questions/187032/what-is-the-differences-between-sli-and-crossfire-closed) was closed.  It states that the question is &quot;ambiguous, vague, incomplete, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form&quot;, however I feel that the question is pretty clear:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What are the differences?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why are some motherboard supported of one type?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to have both work?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm just wanting some clarity of this so that I can write better question further on.  " />
  <row Id="2811" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1411" RevisionGUID="e7c93731-32a6-4527-a8ff-30b957c1a72d" CreationDate="2010-09-10T15:38:04.160" UserId="47225" Text="How was this question not a real question?" />
  <row Id="2812" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1411" RevisionGUID="e7c93731-32a6-4527-a8ff-30b957c1a72d" CreationDate="2010-09-10T15:38:04.160" UserId="47225" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="2813" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1410" RevisionGUID="4e285904-c0eb-430c-a56f-4e23c5cf631f" CreationDate="2010-09-10T16:02:02.843" UserId="43645" Comment="deleted 55 characters in body" Text="Is  there a fast way for someone with 3k+ rep to find questions nominated for closing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If there's not, can we make one?  I think this would prevent a lot of redundant effort, i.e. 5 different highish rep users having to find a duplicate question, or happen to read a question and notice that it has been nominated for closing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think we could get a lot more questions closed and cleaned if there were an easy list to check often, and see what other users have nominated for closure.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I apologize if one exists that I don't know about!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**EDIT:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Removed the part that Sathya (correctly) objected to." />
  <row Id="2814" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1412" RevisionGUID="c955d52d-aa4b-40f9-8616-88a4ae491e16" CreationDate="2010-09-10T16:02:14.247" UserId="3981" Text="Simple. It's a debate and a discussion. It's trying to compare Intel to AMD. It is not a specific question. Better known as flame bait.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That question will lead to:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - Trolls, because it's going to come up in google and every person with an opinion is going to post&#xD;&#xA; - Makes no technical sense, comparing apples to oranges.&#xD;&#xA; - It's a discussion. This is not a forum.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Being around on the site for a while makes us very aware of what type of questions attracts what audiences, and that question was going to end up becoming a major problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Be aware. The moderators close based on history and the overall good of the site. Experience has taught us how google etc. reacts to questions and the results, and therefore we have very very strict closing policies**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*(I was opting to close it as not a real question based on the second point above, however it's a very thin line)*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2815" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1413" RevisionGUID="3f261428-8ddc-4eb0-894a-05960e49fbe4" CreationDate="2010-09-10T16:09:17.043" UserId="3981" Text="There is a page available once you reach 10K. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before then, no, and past request for this has been declined. The page for seeing proposed closed questions is one of the features you can unlock by gaining reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So in short. Keep giving good input and gaining reputation, and you will score :)" />
  <row Id="2816" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1408" RevisionGUID="8125b983-1f3d-4af9-8426-714e9e2b61cf" CreationDate="2010-09-10T16:12:54.930" UserId="3981" Comment="Please try and not divulge correspondence with moderators" Text="I would like to see my personal stats on SU. I mean by that, how many entried I've edited, on how many questions I've upvote. This is to compare on how many votes, editions or anything I miss to get a new badge by example...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to do that?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I saw this: [OData Explorer](http://odata.stackexchange.com/) but I only see an xml file.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Hope my question was clear enough!" />
  <row Id="2817" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1408" RevisionGUID="c1f7ecfd-f935-47df-a158-c0e040664323" CreationDate="2010-09-10T17:26:17.033" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="2819" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1414" RevisionGUID="bb4f901b-6b03-4dc3-94e2-f22b9e03f886" CreationDate="2010-09-11T00:21:06.560" UserId="11546" Text="Today, again, for some reason I was logged out of Superuser and, Indeed Meta. I didn't log out! Why am I logged out?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This has happened at least twice that I am aware of.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Regards,&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2820" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1414" RevisionGUID="bb4f901b-6b03-4dc3-94e2-f22b9e03f886" CreationDate="2010-09-11T00:21:06.560" UserId="11546" Text="Today, again, for some reason I was logged out of Superuser and, Indeed Meta. I didn't log out! Why am I logged out?" />
  <row Id="2821" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1414" RevisionGUID="bb4f901b-6b03-4dc3-94e2-f22b9e03f886" CreationDate="2010-09-11T00:21:06.560" UserId="11546" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;superusr&gt;&lt;logout&gt;" />
  <row Id="2822" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1415" RevisionGUID="7b29bacf-1e01-41c8-9ac9-178806ae259d" CreationDate="2010-09-11T01:25:55.763" UserId="49024" Text="I think there should be some way to make any &quot;incorrectly answered question&quot; have &quot;unanswered&quot; status.  Just because someone has responded to a question doesn't mean that it is worthwhile.  In fact, many such &quot;quick&quot; answers are not well thought out.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(Or have I misunderstood?  Do questions remain &quot;unanswered&quot; until an answer is accepted.  If so, it would be good to have a flag that the answer was, shall we say, &quot;insufficient&quot;.)&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2823" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1415" RevisionGUID="7b29bacf-1e01-41c8-9ac9-178806ae259d" CreationDate="2010-09-11T01:25:55.763" UserId="49024" Text="make incorrectly answered question have unanswered status" />
  <row Id="2824" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1415" RevisionGUID="7b29bacf-1e01-41c8-9ac9-178806ae259d" CreationDate="2010-09-11T01:25:55.763" UserId="49024" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2825" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1416" RevisionGUID="17745a43-2072-4c39-9779-12aaa973e8e1" CreationDate="2010-09-11T03:15:53.387" UserId="20088" Text="Questions you see in the &quot;unanswered&quot; list are questions with **no upvoted answers**. If an answer is incorrect, chances are that it will be either voted down or at least not voted up; as such, those questions will remain in the unanswered list." />
  <row Id="2826" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1417" RevisionGUID="a806461c-1df9-4b3d-9cc9-97929aa2d6a6" CreationDate="2010-09-11T08:09:06.640" UserId="3981" Text="Please read the blog [here](http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/09/global-network-auto-login/)" />
  <row Id="2827" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1414" RevisionGUID="fa33076a-bcb7-4e0c-8076-bce344a70f44" CreationDate="2010-09-11T08:09:20.027" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;superusr&gt;&lt;logout&gt;" />
  <row Id="2828" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1418" RevisionGUID="f8220c66-4ee4-4a35-9b36-6b073e0f5a48" CreationDate="2010-09-11T13:42:57.207" UserId="49024" Text="I had an account on StackOverflow and another here on SuperUser.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yesterday, I saw an option on StackOverflow to merge accounts, and I tried to do so.  Unfortunately, I probably did something wrong, and the result was a duplicate account here on SuperUser.  There are now two virtually identical users named &quot;Mark T&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;How can I merge these two accounts (or get rid of the one not tied to StackOverflow)?&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2829" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1418" RevisionGUID="f8220c66-4ee4-4a35-9b36-6b073e0f5a48" CreationDate="2010-09-11T13:42:57.207" UserId="49024" Text="how to merge duplicate accounts" />
  <row Id="2830" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1418" RevisionGUID="f8220c66-4ee4-4a35-9b36-6b073e0f5a48" CreationDate="2010-09-11T13:42:57.207" UserId="49024" Text="&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="2831" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1419" RevisionGUID="f07f4e3d-a15a-4f7c-93df-d3de26cc161b" CreationDate="2010-09-11T15:04:31.870" UserId="3981" Text="Please flag a post by one of the accounts with both User Id's and it will be merged for you. Also specify which one is the primary account." />
  <row Id="2832" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="44eed72d-c5f2-403e-b5ff-be9bc310e4ba" CreationDate="2010-09-11T15:22:27.810" UserId="46669" Text="A min ago i reached fast  1512 in 5 mins from 1474, now i am back to 1474 in just 5 mins , how is this possible . Please if there moderator seeing this please specify where i lost my rep" />
  <row Id="2833" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="44eed72d-c5f2-403e-b5ff-be9bc310e4ba" CreationDate="2010-09-11T15:22:27.810" UserId="46669" Text="Sudden Lost of Reputation." />
  <row Id="2834" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="44eed72d-c5f2-403e-b5ff-be9bc310e4ba" CreationDate="2010-09-11T15:22:27.810" UserId="46669" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="2835" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="d91aa0ff-1f12-4892-b17a-859bb8a21701" CreationDate="2010-09-11T15:38:23.827" UserId="46669" Comment="deleted 8 characters in body; added 10 characters in body" Text="A minute ago I reached 1,512 in 5 minutes from 1,474. Now i am back to 1,474 in just 5 minutes. How is this possible . Please any moderator tell  me where i lost my rep. What is happening." />
  <row Id="2836" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="80addc09-f025-41af-8bfd-f6c88f3e3a9e" CreationDate="2010-09-11T16:17:04.807" UserId="46669" Comment="added 61 characters in body" Text="A minute ago I reached 1,512 in 5 minutes from 1,474. Now i am back to 1,474 in just 5 minutes. How is this possible . Please any moderator tell  me where i lost my rep. What is happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/OtgYy.jpg" />
  <row Id="2837" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1421" RevisionGUID="701d2615-a6f7-4c0f-a270-ba9825b14518" CreationDate="2010-09-11T16:26:23.917" UserId="4386" Text="If you received a lot of reputation in 5 minutes, most likely the system thought someone was cheating or raising your reputation and corrected it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If it wasn't automatic, it was probably just a recalc which happens when a mod wants it or periodically.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2838" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1422" RevisionGUID="cd5f03eb-f32e-44dc-bb89-39e871ee0a8a" CreationDate="2010-09-11T16:37:54.807" UserId="33300" Text="I´ve got a strange thing going on here. My reputation showed in the bar on top of the site is 714.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![reputaion1][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was happy with it until i looked at `http://superuser.com/reputation` yesterday.&#xD;&#xA;The reputation score there is 717.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![reputation2][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which score is the correct one and how is this possible? I assumed something like an automatic recalculation, but it has been this way foor two days now and I guess it issn´t a recalc at all. So, can anybody tell me if what´s going on here? I don´t care about the three points but I really would appreciate the knowledge how something like this is possible. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/GnEXj.png&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/5nOc0.png" />
  <row Id="2839" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1422" RevisionGUID="cd5f03eb-f32e-44dc-bb89-39e871ee0a8a" CreationDate="2010-09-11T16:37:54.807" UserId="33300" Text="Different Reputation showed. Which one is correct?" />
  <row Id="2840" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1422" RevisionGUID="cd5f03eb-f32e-44dc-bb89-39e871ee0a8a" CreationDate="2010-09-11T16:37:54.807" UserId="33300" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="2841" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1423" RevisionGUID="14760d9c-7e75-4516-8cd9-e60336bb4c6f" CreationDate="2010-09-11T16:44:38.827" UserId="3981" Text="I deleted one of your posts because of it violating copyright. As there was quite a few deleted posts on your account I also did a reputation recalculation to ensure that your rep shows correctly for the rep leagues and the current competition. During a reputation recalculation and votes received for any of the following is removed:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Deleted Posts&#xD;&#xA;- CW Posts&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2842" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="d289cca9-fd51-46a9-aa7a-19b597329a01" CreationDate="2010-09-11T16:45:54.737" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;&lt;users&gt;" />
  <row Id="2843" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1422" RevisionGUID="c78e4690-933a-4508-af60-ae1f71a49060" CreationDate="2010-09-11T16:49:26.960" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="2844" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1424" RevisionGUID="b8b4486d-6f50-4b53-9e04-b232b868fa96" CreationDate="2010-09-11T16:49:59.830" UserId="3981" Text="I have done a reputation recalculation on your account and this should now show correctly. For future reference, the reputation report is always the most correct.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please see my answer [here](http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1420/sudden-lost-of-reputation/1423#1423) for why this would happen. It is rare however for reputation to be higher then the report, but it has happened at times, where question where deleted and then undeleted for example." />
  <row Id="2845" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1422" RevisionGUID="63a972e9-b3a7-46bc-9c13-1506eea5fda9" CreationDate="2010-09-11T16:50:17.440" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="2846" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="6737c2b4-f92f-484e-899e-a46932680013" CreationDate="2010-09-11T17:56:30.637" UserId="46669" Comment="added 143 characters in body; added 82 characters in body; added 7 characters in body; added 4 characters in body" Text="A minute ago I reached 1,512 in 5 minutes from 1,474. Now i am back to 1,474 in just 5 minutes. How is this possible . Please any moderator tell  me where i lost my rep. What is happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt; &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I lost my Rep again this time I was 1534 now i am 1519**&#xD;&#xA;but meta shows i have 1529&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But in meta it shows &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/OtgYy.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/hoknd.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.imgur.com/bHywt.jpg" />
  <row Id="2847" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="fad0e7e0-1ce5-428c-a8ec-d04fd8978346" CreationDate="2010-09-11T20:11:55.563" UserId="46669" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:46669,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;subanki&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2848" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="a6e174ee-67aa-4010-aa73-972fd34f3840" CreationDate="2010-09-11T21:18:24.577" UserId="3981" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:3981,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Diago&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2849" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="59dbd57c-0c8f-49ab-9fa0-a193a0b1aba9" CreationDate="2010-09-12T03:16:43.867" UserId="4377" Comment="Removed images no longer relevant" Text="A minute ago I reached 1,512 in 5 minutes from 1,474. Now i am back to 1,474 in just 5 minutes. How is this possible . Please any moderator tell  me where I lost my rep. What is happening.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Ed:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I lost my Rep again this time I was 1534, now I am 1519 - but meta shows I have 1529.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But in meta it shows &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/hoknd.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.imgur.com/bHywt.jpg" />
  <row Id="2850" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="59dbd57c-0c8f-49ab-9fa0-a193a0b1aba9" CreationDate="2010-09-12T03:16:43.867" UserId="4377" Comment="Removed images no longer relevant" Text="Sudden Loss of Reputation" />
  <row Id="2851" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1425" RevisionGUID="45954a91-3a9c-4e24-936a-a3b40c4a5ab4" CreationDate="2010-09-12T05:37:09.353" UserId="20088" Text="Is there a comprehensive list of what markdown elements can be used in comment boxes? I only recently discovered that the shorter format for links actually works (whereas the longer format doesn't), and now I'm wondering what else we can put in comment boxes. Here's what I've gotten so far, is there more?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Links:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [link text](http://example.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bold/italic**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **bold**  _italic_&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It doesn't seem like there's any way to get bulleted lists, etc. but I feel like I might be missing something, since I lived for months thinking you could only paste links as-is without being able to specify the text displayed." />
  <row Id="2852" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1425" RevisionGUID="45954a91-3a9c-4e24-936a-a3b40c4a5ab4" CreationDate="2010-09-12T05:37:09.353" UserId="20088" Text="More comprehensive documentation of markdown available for comment boxes" />
  <row Id="2853" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1425" RevisionGUID="45954a91-3a9c-4e24-936a-a3b40c4a5ab4" CreationDate="2010-09-12T05:37:09.353" UserId="20088" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;markdown&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="2855" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1427" RevisionGUID="42441633-e836-450e-9701-46d6d8937b04" CreationDate="2010-09-12T09:53:40.027" UserId="14827" Text="See [Text Formatting Now Allowed In Comments (List of Proven and Disproven Abilities)](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/2115/text-formatting-now-allowed-in-comments-list-of-proven-and-disproven-abilities) on MSO for a list of formatting that works in comments." />
  <row Id="2856" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1420" RevisionGUID="702c6010-0690-41b4-b0f7-b7bdb57d044f" CreationDate="2010-09-12T21:04:41.593" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="7" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:46669,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;subanki&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:4386,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Wil&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:4377,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Sathya&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:289,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;ChrisF&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:1339,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Chealion&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="2858" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1428" RevisionGUID="44222814-ac09-489b-82ac-86528d75f6eb" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:12:11.553" UserDisplayName="fizzy" Text="Superuser OpenID login sends a request like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    telnet phor.net 80&#xD;&#xA;    GET /professional HTTP/1.0&#xD;&#xA;    Accept:text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xrds+xml` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And my Apache server gives the error:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    406 Not Acceptable: &#xD;&#xA;    An appropriate representation of the requested resource /professional &#xD;&#xA;    could not be found on this server. Available variants: &#xD;&#xA;    professional.php, type  application/x-httpd-php&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a normal web browser hits the site, content negotiation correctly selects professional.php as the resource for this request. Is it possible to serve this same file to superuser?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2859" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1428" RevisionGUID="44222814-ac09-489b-82ac-86528d75f6eb" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:12:11.553" UserDisplayName="fizzy" Text="Error from superuser OpenID login with content negotiation" />
  <row Id="2860" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1428" RevisionGUID="44222814-ac09-489b-82ac-86528d75f6eb" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:12:11.553" UserDisplayName="fizzy" Text="&lt;php&gt;&lt;apache&gt;" />
  <row Id="2861" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1428" RevisionGUID="97d46f8a-9f70-47c1-aec2-41799132ce2a" CreationDate="2010-09-13T14:18:09.073" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/188102/error-from-superuser-openid-login-with-content-negotiation" Text="" />
  <row Id="2862" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1429" RevisionGUID="7a3df1d4-3af9-4add-9af3-0018369ab54a" CreationDate="2010-09-13T15:59:36.017" UserId="11133" Text="I would like to see how many close/reopen votes my question currently has (so I can decide how much effort I'm going to put into it, how many people think the same as the closers, etc...). " />
  <row Id="2863" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1429" RevisionGUID="7a3df1d4-3af9-4add-9af3-0018369ab54a" CreationDate="2010-09-13T15:59:36.017" UserId="11133" Text="Please show close votes state for questioner" />
  <row Id="2864" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1429" RevisionGUID="7a3df1d4-3af9-4add-9af3-0018369ab54a" CreationDate="2010-09-13T15:59:36.017" UserId="11133" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2865" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1430" RevisionGUID="c76cd8e6-0a7b-4077-ab2b-d48c0a96eab6" CreationDate="2010-09-13T17:59:42.913" UserId="20088" Text="According to the [SuperUser FAQ][1] section on Reputation, once you reach 250 points of rep, you have the ability to vote to close, reopen or migrate your own question. That also means that you will be able to see other people's close votes as well. The functionality you're looking for already exists, you'll just need to earn some more rep before you can use it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/faq#reputation" />
  <row Id="2866" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1431" RevisionGUID="9394698c-7516-4cfa-a036-b7e2988d4665" CreationDate="2010-09-13T18:07:51.007" UserId="4377" Text="If the question is your own, the [FAQ][1] states that you can vote to open/close and you can see the close reasons ( look below)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![FAQ][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If the question is not yours, and you're a 3k+ user, you can see the number of close votes on the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Clicking on the close link will tell you the reason for the same&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![close reason][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, the system does have the features that you request for, just you will need to earn the required rep before accessing them. Having said that, as JNK mentioned, most of the times, the people voting to close will leave a comment as to why the question may/will be closed. &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Do note that even if your question is closed, you **can** revise it and maybe change it to a state is acceptable according to the FAQ. once you feel that you've revised it enough use the option to flag for moderator attention and drop a message stating that you feel the question is now in a state that can be answered by the community. Note that even if the moderator re-opens it, the community may vote to close again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/faq&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/QnyGs.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.imgur.com/INvaR.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.imgur.com/uhn0x.png" />
  <row Id="2867" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1429" RevisionGUID="f838cb65-8684-4168-99ea-9b2129a04dfb" CreationDate="2010-09-13T18:21:14.703" UserId="4377" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;&lt;vote-to-close&gt;" />
  <row Id="2868" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1432" RevisionGUID="d13529fb-a1d8-40f3-8144-7b1babd4c019" CreationDate="2010-09-13T18:30:02.373" UserId="42672" Text="I see it tells me very recent changes to any of them and how many. Today, this week, last month e.t.c.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But I don't  want to see changes and I don't want to see just as far as last month. &#xD;&#xA;Or rather.. I don't mind but i'm not looking for that.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I just want a list of my favorites. From the  perspective of archiving useful info. Not for monitoring.  A list of the threads that I favorited." />
  <row Id="2869" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1432" RevisionGUID="d13529fb-a1d8-40f3-8144-7b1babd4c019" CreationDate="2010-09-13T18:30:02.373" UserId="42672" Text="list favorites?" />
  <row Id="2870" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1432" RevisionGUID="d13529fb-a1d8-40f3-8144-7b1babd4c019" CreationDate="2010-09-13T18:30:02.373" UserId="42672" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;support&gt;&lt;profile-page&gt;&lt;favorites&gt;" />
  <row Id="2871" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1433" RevisionGUID="2a7b78cb-a18c-48ea-a3ef-b9e15b212d56" CreationDate="2010-09-13T18:47:04.003" UserId="4377" Text="It's there on your [profile page][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Profile favs][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/42672&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/vvcO9.png" />
  <row Id="2872" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1434" RevisionGUID="6d106cb5-9a61-443c-91bf-052c63a827bd" CreationDate="2010-09-13T22:48:55.860" UserId="1" Text="This post is to document the **week 3** winners of the [Super User Super Contest][contest], for the week ending **Monday, September 13**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Congratulations to our winners this week!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [Best rookie][suleague] performance by [**Brad**][rookie]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![best rookie performance week of 08-30-2010][rookiepic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. [Highest reputation][suleague] produced by [**Subanki**][toprep]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![top users week of 08-30-2010][topreppic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Best meta post:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [Is it OK to downvote link only or link/copy/paste answers?][bestmeta] by [**JNK**][bestmetauser]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Most awesome new question or answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [What is the origin of the hard drive light?][bestweek] by [**RCIX**][bestweekuser]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are contacting the winners now, so be sure to check your email inboxes!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[contest]:      http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/super-user-1-year-anniversary-super-contest/&#xD;&#xA;[suleague]:     http://stackexchange.com/leagues/3/week/superuser/2010-09-06&#xD;&#xA;[rookiepic]:    http://imgur.com/J353T.png&#xD;&#xA;[topreppic]:    http://imgur.com/JNi91.png&#xD;&#xA;[bestweek]:     http://superuser.com/questions/185980/what-is-the-origin-of-the-hard-drive-light&#xD;&#xA;[bestweekuser]: http://superuser.com/users/2130/rcix&#xD;&#xA;[bestmeta]:     http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1393/is-it-ok-to-downvote-link-only-or-link-copy-paste-answers&#xD;&#xA;[bestmetauser]: http://meta.superuser.com/users/43645/jnk&#xD;&#xA;[rookie]:       http://superuser.com/users/48624/brad&#xD;&#xA;[toprep]:       http://superuser.com/users/46669/subanki" />
  <row Id="2873" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1434" RevisionGUID="6d106cb5-9a61-443c-91bf-052c63a827bd" CreationDate="2010-09-13T22:48:55.860" UserId="1" Text="Super Contest Winners: Week 3" />
  <row Id="2874" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1434" RevisionGUID="6d106cb5-9a61-443c-91bf-052c63a827bd" CreationDate="2010-09-13T22:48:55.860" UserId="1" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;super-contest&gt;" />
  <row Id="2875" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1435" RevisionGUID="47904828-4506-46c4-b369-42857fd94b07" CreationDate="2010-09-13T22:56:16.993" UserId="4377" Text="Congrats to the winners :D&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![close][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://i.imgur.com/1whAE.png" />
  <row Id="2876" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1388" RevisionGUID="74aa9f5b-f1fb-4b03-ad19-12a5ba5f6ecb" CreationDate="2010-09-13T23:24:25.733" UserId="4377" Comment="added 52 characters in body" Text="Congrats to the winners :D&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![close][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://i.imgur.com/1whAE.png" />
  <row Id="2877" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1436" RevisionGUID="38b5d0dc-ca7c-4585-a76c-656034d8566e" CreationDate="2010-09-14T01:37:31.060" UserId="36565" Text="Apparently after 18 revisions by 3 different users, it finally got converted to Community Wiki." />
  <row Id="2878" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1425" RevisionGUID="e202b942-d393-4074-b0ad-68e852b5df19" CreationDate="2010-09-14T04:28:36.560" UserId="20088" Comment="Added `code`" Text="Is there a comprehensive list of what markdown elements can be used in comment boxes? I only recently discovered that the shorter format for links actually works (whereas the longer format doesn't), and now I'm wondering what else we can put in comment boxes. Here's what I've gotten so far, is there more?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Links:**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [link text](http://example.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Bold/italic**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    **bold**  _italic_&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Code snippets**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `code`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It doesn't seem like there's any way to get bulleted lists, etc. but I feel like I might be missing something, since I lived for months thinking you could only paste links as-is without being able to specify the text displayed." />
  <row Id="2879" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1437" RevisionGUID="736b7154-7c9d-4e64-a999-c9861c5e1b50" CreationDate="2010-09-14T12:33:45.030" UserId="42672" Text="hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;my username has changed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can still log in with my openid and pswd. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;could be a technical glitch?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;how do I restore my username?" />
  <row Id="2880" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1437" RevisionGUID="736b7154-7c9d-4e64-a999-c9861c5e1b50" CreationDate="2010-09-14T12:33:45.030" UserId="42672" Text="my username changed! how do I restore it?" />
  <row Id="2881" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1437" RevisionGUID="736b7154-7c9d-4e64-a999-c9861c5e1b50" CreationDate="2010-09-14T12:33:45.030" UserId="42672" Text="&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="2882" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1438" RevisionGUID="78dc20f1-4ef5-4255-addc-b8d0375b9e34" CreationDate="2010-09-14T13:17:12.993" UserId="39366" Text="If you click your username on the top-bar, to get up your profile, there's an edit button just to the right of the words &quot;Registered User&quot;, this will let you change your username (and other details, obviously).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for *why* it changed, I don't know - anyone?" />
  <row Id="2883" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1439" RevisionGUID="e1500a9a-d765-4377-b61e-67d5ff2aae9f" CreationDate="2010-09-14T14:18:21.220" UserId="42672" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;apparently a solution here&#xD;&#xA;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/64433/username-missing-from-launchpad-openid-replaced-with-usernumber/64434#64434&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;related-http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/64439/my-profile-just-went-blank&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2884" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1440" RevisionGUID="06470a0a-4e45-4fdc-b012-f295e7de35b0" CreationDate="2010-09-14T16:35:07.693" UserId="39366" Text="I thought this was too funny to not share with everyone...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My t-shirt and stickers have arrived (thanks btw!). Along with an *interesting* post-it note:  &#xD;&#xA;![Stack Exchange stickers  with interesting post-it note][1]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And here's a close-up:  &#xD;&#xA;![Interesting post-it note close up][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's a proper post-it type note as well, with a little sticky across the top of the back. The ink has seeped through it a little. Nothing else in here to explain why it's there, just shows the humour of the SE team, I guess, which is great.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I think I shall make it my gravatar, at least for a while. :)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/2UFPt.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/AmtjX.jpg" />
  <row Id="2885" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1439" RevisionGUID="b0af8178-7ab3-4d36-aadd-f4d7351a31bf" CreationDate="2010-09-14T19:54:38.767" UserId="289" Comment="typo" Text="&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;apparently a solution here&#xD;&#xA;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/64433/username-missing-from-launchpad-openid-replaced-with-usernumber/64434#64434&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;related http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/64439/my-profile-just-went-blank&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2886" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1441" RevisionGUID="383b3edf-626d-47c8-a702-59b7a02ea709" CreationDate="2010-09-14T23:25:51.880" UserId="6512" Text="I stumbled across this question on [Which HDD brand do you ..trust][1] which was closed due to the subjective nature of it. While I agree it is subjective, I can't help but wonder where so valuable a question such as this would fit in the Stack Exchange network of sites? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Despite the subjectivity of the above question, it is still a very legitimate concern for anyone constructing a computer, because let's be honest, some hardware manufacturers really do suck- and with something so crucial as a disk drive it pays to be informed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not proposing that subjective questions like these be allowed, I'd just like to know if there is anywhere they would be allowed. Is this sort of question a better candidate for a separate Area 51 site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/146939/which-hdd-brand-do-you-trust-closed" />
  <row Id="2887" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1441" RevisionGUID="383b3edf-626d-47c8-a702-59b7a02ea709" CreationDate="2010-09-14T23:25:51.880" UserId="6512" Text="Subjective but still valuable questions" />
  <row Id="2888" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1441" RevisionGUID="383b3edf-626d-47c8-a702-59b7a02ea709" CreationDate="2010-09-14T23:25:51.880" UserId="6512" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;" />
  <row Id="2889" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1441" RevisionGUID="2b479d62-e610-4b01-95ac-d179c5b0781b" CreationDate="2010-09-15T03:00:47.707" UserId="6512" Comment="added 14 characters in body" Text="I stumbled across this question on [Which HDD brand do you ..trust][1] which was closed due to the subjective nature of it. While I agree it is subjective, I can't help but wonder where so valuable a question such as this would fit in the Stack Exchange network of sites? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Despite the subjectivity of the above question, it is still a very legitimate concern for anyone constructing a computer, because let's be honest, some hardware manufacturers really do suck- and with something so crucial as a disk drive it pays to be informed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not proposing that subjective questions like these be allowed on Super User, I'd just like to know if there is anywhere they would be allowed. Is this sort of question a better candidate for a separate Area 51 site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/146939/which-hdd-brand-do-you-trust-closed" />
  <row Id="2890" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1442" RevisionGUID="abf8841f-2cb3-4b32-a51a-f64628a70758" CreationDate="2010-09-15T04:10:46.610" UserId="4377" Text="It's a legitimate concern, yes, but what would you consider as an accepted answer ? Half the folks say WD is reliable, other say WD is bad ( taking WD as an example). &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Back on your question, Stack Engine series of sites are not meant for extended discussion - I see that you have put [forward a proposal][1]. I'd also recommend you have a look at [Technology Recommendations Proposal][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/20747/consumer-reviews&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/20084/technology-recommendations" />
  <row Id="2891" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1443" RevisionGUID="a1d1012d-6398-4a80-8a28-120ba72fa399" CreationDate="2010-09-15T11:46:47.437" UserId="289" Text="In this case it *might* be possible to restructure the question to minimise the subjectiveness, but ultimately it's going to be a list of anecdotes ranging from &quot;don't buy I had 5 fail in 5 minutes&quot; to &quot;go for this one, it's worked 24/7 for the past 10 years&quot;." />
  <row Id="2892" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1444" RevisionGUID="18eb2a26-1ad1-436e-be1a-3b154d03ced3" CreationDate="2010-09-15T11:58:02.277" UserId="43645" Text="To add on to the other answers:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideally all the questions here and in the other Stack Exchange sites would address a specific **issue or problem**.  You need to have something with an unequivocal answer that WORKS. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&quot;What is the best widget?&quot; type questions have no real answer." />
  <row Id="2893" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1445" RevisionGUID="a15673bc-8d39-488d-8fee-41c03bc7c742" CreationDate="2010-09-15T14:12:59.863" UserId="41423" Text="To put it another way: can we assume that someone who asks a question on Superuser has tried to find the answer elsewhere first?  For many (most?) people, the first step in finding an answer to just about any question is Google.  If an answer can be found easily on Google, does that make it **too** easy for Superuser?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do we want Superuser to become the first place people go for answers to questions related to computer use?  Does SU 'compete' with Google in that sense?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Certainly, the quality of the answers on SU often exceeds what can be found elsewhere, and the idea of SU being more relevant than Google for finding answers in itself sounds appealing.  But in practice, if SU becomes everyone's first stop for solving computer use problems, we're going to see a lot of questions that are incredibly basic.  Is that a problem?  Perhaps not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question comes down to this: are there questions that are too easy for Superuser?  If so, how should such questions be handled?  If not, then it should be interesting to see what happens to the quality of SU questions as the site becomes more popular.  If the SU moderators spend all their time reframing Google search results in easy-to-consume packages, the task might grow wearisome." />
  <row Id="2894" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1445" RevisionGUID="a15673bc-8d39-488d-8fee-41c03bc7c742" CreationDate="2010-09-15T14:12:59.863" UserId="41423" Text="Are some questions too easy for Superuser?" />
  <row Id="2895" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1445" RevisionGUID="a15673bc-8d39-488d-8fee-41c03bc7c742" CreationDate="2010-09-15T14:12:59.863" UserId="41423" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;google&gt;" />
  <row Id="2896" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1446" RevisionGUID="8a8f64ad-bf40-44e4-bc7d-1a962bbb1268" CreationDate="2010-09-15T15:28:03.300" UserId="3981" Text="This is going to be a short answer since this topic gets hashed and rehashed a thousand times however:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Google is the Super User/Server Fault/Stack Overflow home page**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The Trilogy and SE is attempting to be a canonical source of information regarding each topic it represents.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as the question is phrased and meets the criteria of the site, it should be answered, correctly, without a link back to a Google source, apart from potentially the search terms used to assist users. " />
  <row Id="2897" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1447" RevisionGUID="e5dfb8cf-fa71-4e20-ac65-fde3d602c9e6" CreationDate="2010-09-15T21:22:49.770" UserId="17300" Text="Also there may be a &quot;Not Exact Answer&quot; or &quot;Unrelated Answer&quot;, etc. For example there is an answer to this question http://superuser.com/questions/16388/is-there-a-way-to-move-taskbar-items-to-the-system-tray : http://superuser.com/questions/16388/is-there-a-way-to-move-taskbar-items-to-the-system-tray/16445#16445" />
  <row Id="2898" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1448" RevisionGUID="882f0647-68b0-46a9-ab9c-03d0e2022368" CreationDate="2010-09-15T23:58:01.823" UserId="23420" Text="I think it's safe to assume that people who don't know what a terminal is will probably end up on a forum like the [Windows 7 Forums](http://www.sevenforums.com/) anyway. Why can I assume this? Here are two prime examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Exhibit A&#xD;&#xA;=&#xD;&#xA;![I love the Welcome banner](http://desmond.yfrog.com/Himg201/scaled.php?tn=0&amp;server=201&amp;filename=selection001j.png&amp;xsize=640&amp;ysize=640)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Exhibit B&#xD;&#xA;=&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  **Person 1**: Hey bud, I was wondering if you could help me change the wallpaper on my new laptop thing?&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  **Person 2**: Yikes, I'm gonna have to say you're going toI'd like to think that the more basic questions belong with someone's tech support or on a separate forum, like the have to check SuperUser, it's pretty tough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;v.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  **Person 1**: HELP ME FRIEND!!! MY MOUSE REACHED THE END OF THE MOUSEPAD AND NOW I CAN'T USE IT!!! HELP!!!&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  **Person 2**: Calm down, we'll do this quickly and swiftly. I'll check on Google. (20 seconds later) Apparently all you have to do is *pick up* the mouse and put it back on the mousepad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which one is more realistic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, more complicated questions that are still Googleable (e.g. finding the best antivirus), they should be answered anyway because SuperUser is also part wiki." />
  <row Id="2899" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1449" RevisionGUID="aa961972-0876-47d5-9746-82652ee826d6" CreationDate="2010-09-16T03:53:28.760" UserId="4377" Text="You have provided answers which have  &gt;10 [upvotes][1], which matches the badge qualification&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![answers][2]&#xD;&#xA;![badges][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;As for Good answer, the answer had probably been migrated/deleted. Badges awarded generally [are not revoked][4] .&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/users/1086/john-rudy#qpage_1-apage_1-qsort_votes-asort_votes&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/NeQja.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.imgur.com/NIDZ3.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/17853/how-do-badges-work" />
  <row Id="2900" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1450" RevisionGUID="0cba521f-07ba-451d-86d9-9885779f33ae" CreationDate="2010-09-16T04:01:35.407" UserId="4377" Text="&#xD;&#xA;[This question][1] has been tagged twice with [windows-7-x64]. Oddly, the same tag shows up twice, with different counts. Clicking on each of those tags, brings the same questions, although one less than the actual count. What's happening ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![tags][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![tags-on-question][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![search-for-tags][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/189172/cant-install-chromium-x64-error-o&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/C9vjE.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.imgur.com/4Nyxf.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.imgur.com/lXASW.png" />
  <row Id="2901" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1450" RevisionGUID="0cba521f-07ba-451d-86d9-9885779f33ae" CreationDate="2010-09-16T04:01:35.407" UserId="4377" Text="Why is the question tagged twice with the same tag and yet the question count does not match ?" />
  <row Id="2902" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1450" RevisionGUID="0cba521f-07ba-451d-86d9-9885779f33ae" CreationDate="2010-09-16T04:01:35.407" UserId="4377" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="2903" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1451" RevisionGUID="704bb2d8-7e55-40e2-8b48-e888f5e4525c" CreationDate="2010-09-16T04:17:16.200" UserId="2054" Text="Clicking on a tag that has no tag wiki shows the following message atop all questions (except the tag name might differ, obviously):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, clicking on it greets one with&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Tag wikis can be edited by users with more than 2000 reputation, provided:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * They are in the top 20 answerers for this tag or&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * They have a total score of 100 or more for this tag&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm quite obviously not in that category for a tag that has a mere three questions, but anyway: Providing the link to create the tag wiki is only helpful in the first place if the user *is actually allowed to create anything*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://hypftier.de/dump/su-tag-wiki-create.png" />
  <row Id="2904" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1451" RevisionGUID="704bb2d8-7e55-40e2-8b48-e888f5e4525c" CreationDate="2010-09-16T04:17:16.200" UserId="2054" Text="The suggestion to create a Tag wiki should be only there if the user can actually create one" />
  <row Id="2905" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1451" RevisionGUID="704bb2d8-7e55-40e2-8b48-e888f5e4525c" CreationDate="2010-09-16T04:17:16.200" UserId="2054" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;ui&gt;" />
  <row Id="2906" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1452" RevisionGUID="a0fc958a-d2b7-41bf-a6ac-f91cf87fd66f" CreationDate="2010-09-16T12:16:40.510" UserId="1" Text="it means a moderator renamed a tag. renames don't protect against dupes." />
  <row Id="2907" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1453" RevisionGUID="ed5c2652-aa42-4b59-88ee-da4d26491e5a" CreationDate="2010-09-16T18:36:27.400" UserId="39366" Text="[This][1] question is showing as migrated, but doesn't display where from.&#xD;&#xA;Seen by at least me and KronoS (see [chat][4]).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As per [the same chat][2] Diago♦ has identified it as having come from Server Fault.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Screenshot&#xD;&#xA;![Shot of migrated question that doesn't show a source][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/189465/usb-ps2-usb-thumb-drive-wtf&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://chat.superuser.com/transcript/message/6204&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://i.imgur.com/8hDIs.png&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://chat.superuser.com/transcript/message/6195" />
  <row Id="2908" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1453" RevisionGUID="ed5c2652-aa42-4b59-88ee-da4d26491e5a" CreationDate="2010-09-16T18:36:27.400" UserId="39366" Text="Migrated question missing it's &quot;source&quot;" />
  <row Id="2909" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1453" RevisionGUID="ed5c2652-aa42-4b59-88ee-da4d26491e5a" CreationDate="2010-09-16T18:36:27.400" UserId="39366" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="2910" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1453" RevisionGUID="be06fffb-b79a-4749-af29-4f7bc2d22f28" CreationDate="2010-09-16T18:39:04.443" UserId="43645" Comment="edited title" Text="Migrated question missing its &quot;source&quot;" />
  <row Id="2911" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1453" RevisionGUID="f7b10a5d-0117-4027-b07a-ac31484da6c1" CreationDate="2010-09-16T18:45:14.493" UserId="4377" Comment="added 86 characters in body" Text="[This][1] question is being shown as migrated, but it doesn't display from where it was migrated.&#xD;&#xA;KronoS and Me [spotted this][2], and [Diago♦][3] confirmed that it come from [Server Fault][4].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;##Screenshot&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Shot of migrated question that doesn't show a source][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/189465/usb-ps2-usb-thumb-drive-wtf&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://chat.superuser.com/transcript/message/6195&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://chat.superuser.com/transcript/message/6204&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://serverfault.com/questions/181919/usb-ps2-usb-thumb-drive-wtf-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://i.imgur.com/8hDIs.png" />
  <row Id="2912" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1454" RevisionGUID="d283dc97-2fce-4fcb-bcb2-9a80bcb3745c" CreationDate="2010-09-16T20:26:06.073" UserId="4386" Text="Not sure if this should just be here or if I should post of Meta.Stackoverflow - please can a mod move if you think it should be there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When writing answers, one of the items that takes me the longest is to type the keyboard code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;kbd&gt; &lt;/kbd&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not saying it takes hours, or is a major problem, but it is an inconvenience and &#xD;&#xA; I think that this would make an excellent addition." />
  <row Id="2913" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1454" RevisionGUID="d283dc97-2fce-4fcb-bcb2-9a80bcb3745c" CreationDate="2010-09-16T20:26:06.073" UserId="4386" Text="Please add a toolbar button or keyboard shortcut for the Keyboard style." />
  <row Id="2914" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1454" RevisionGUID="d283dc97-2fce-4fcb-bcb2-9a80bcb3745c" CreationDate="2010-09-16T20:26:06.073" UserId="4386" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2915" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1454" RevisionGUID="12d5bd09-6190-4157-9975-b01c21184104" CreationDate="2010-09-16T21:02:34.993" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;editor&gt;&lt;shortcut&gt;" />
  <row Id="2916" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1455" RevisionGUID="d4048c5b-0f3c-45f1-94e5-be9ce163f4f2" CreationDate="2010-09-17T02:00:14.113" UserId="49369" Text="I so agree. &lt;u&gt;And&lt;/u&gt; I'm in the same situation. Being new here, I don't have enough rep yet to amost anything :-(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;/s/ BezantSoft" />
  <row Id="2917" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1455" RevisionGUID="236c328d-3d9e-40e1-a3ff-11aeda5744e5" CreationDate="2010-09-17T02:49:00.310" UserId="4377" Comment="deleted 14 characters in body" Text="I so agree. &lt;u&gt;And&lt;/u&gt; I'm in the same situation. Being new here, I don't have enough rep yet to amost anything :-(&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2918" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1456" RevisionGUID="c3ea8dcd-397e-462b-8872-ab2c93b1210a" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:39:57.343" UserDisplayName="flpgdt" Text="Hi guys,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I work in a small startup and now is the time for creating the company's culture. Having been using superuser/stackoverflow/serverfault fow a while now, it is clear for me how awesome this sites are for sharing knowledge, and hey, *I want one* ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if the superuser/* sites are based in any open/free projects I could implement in my own servers to help us managing our knowledge base.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know, I know, there are plenty of free systems out there to that end. We already have a Wiki, support page, etc... I'm asking if is it possible to have my own *superuser like page*. I think this would be perfect to share products and proprietary technology knowledge among employees as the company grows...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;f." />
  <row Id="2919" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1456" RevisionGUID="c3ea8dcd-397e-462b-8872-ab2c93b1210a" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:39:57.343" UserDisplayName="flpgdt" Text="Install my own superuser page" />
  <row Id="2920" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1456" RevisionGUID="c3ea8dcd-397e-462b-8872-ab2c93b1210a" CreationDate="2010-09-17T08:39:57.343" UserDisplayName="flpgdt" Text="&lt;wiki&gt;&lt;forum&gt;&lt;knowledge-management&gt;" />
  <row Id="2921" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1456" RevisionGUID="64321f2d-2a4b-48cf-bcd7-4cf8cf5c5e64" CreationDate="2010-09-17T09:51:32.093" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/189667/install-my-own-superuser-page" Text="" />
  <row Id="2922" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1457" RevisionGUID="43b27549-c79f-4e11-8c33-441bfc33cb9c" CreationDate="2010-09-17T09:56:29.887" UserId="1548" Text="The only official way to get this is by proposing [an Area51 proposal](http://area51.stackexchange.com)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Given that you probably won't get enough followers (with sufficient rep) to reach Beta through that, your only options are the open source alternatives" />
  <row Id="2923" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1458" RevisionGUID="05bb9aea-fa94-490a-a65f-40d4be5f77a2" CreationDate="2010-09-17T10:38:53.363" UserId="42245" Text="see http://www.osqa.net/" />
  <row Id="2924" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1459" RevisionGUID="a5827ca7-1a9f-4cfc-8c35-7123469fcc44" CreationDate="2010-09-17T11:38:22.810" UserId="10342" Text=" 1. This is not related to the&#xD;&#xA;    &quot;easiness&quot; of the question, but&#xD;&#xA;    related to the general rule that you&#xD;&#xA;    should always search for an answer&#xD;&#xA;    first, before you ask it. If it is an &quot;advanced&quot; question, but is &#xD;&#xA;    a common problem and answered before, it is still wrong to ask it again... &#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA; 2.  From the faq:  &#xD;&#xA;     &gt;  Super User is a Q&amp;A site for computer enthusiasts...&#xD;&#xA;    &#xD;&#xA;    I think that if someone is not a&#xD;&#xA;    computer enthusiast, they would not&#xD;&#xA;    bother to ask a question here if&#xD;&#xA;    he/she had some problems.&#xD;&#xA;    Non-computer enthusiasts will just&#xD;&#xA;    bang the keyboard an swear a bit,&#xD;&#xA;    and go ask a co-worker or a friend&#xD;&#xA;    that _is_ a computer enthusiast. If the enthusiast friend does not know how to answer it, it will probably not be too &quot;easy&quot; to ask here anyway." />
  <row Id="2925" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1460" RevisionGUID="edbb779f-888e-4443-9fd6-c1fa1e44e562" CreationDate="2010-09-17T12:54:20.103" UserId="45990" Text="This is far the best shot:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/2267/stack-overflow-clones&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;cheers,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;f.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ps.: Can't I mark answer nor comment my own questions? o.O" />
  <row Id="2926" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1456" RevisionGUID="e0b17ac6-fafc-496f-a729-eee9fdab346a" CreationDate="2010-09-17T21:19:47.927" UserId="2553" Comment="deleted 33 characters in body" Text="I work in a small startup and now is the time for creating the company's culture. Having been using superuser/stackoverflow/serverfault for a while now, it is clear to me how awesome these sites are for sharing knowledge, and hey, *I want one* ;)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I was wondering if the superuser/* sites are based in any open/free projects I could implement in my own servers to help us managing our knowledge base.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know, I know, there are plenty of free systems out there to that end. We already have a Wiki, support page, etc. I'm asking if is it possible to have my own *superuser like page*. I think this would be perfect to share products and proprietary technology knowledge among employees as the company grows." />
  <row Id="2927" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1461" RevisionGUID="05cf30c3-bd44-4146-9fa6-ba1aa5545d46" CreationDate="2010-09-19T01:23:42.890" UserId="20088" Text="I often see questions which have one or more answers that are comprehensive, correct, helpful, and have many upvotes, and yet the question remains without a marked answer. Generally, it seems like the asker either forgot about it, solved it on their own and never updated the question, or something else like that. I occasionally leave a comment reminding people to mark an accepted answer if their problem has been solve, which usually is enough to encourage them to do so, but I feel kind of awkward doing that, especially if it's a question in which my answer was one of the higher-voted ones, since it feels sort of like fishing for &quot;compliments&quot; (or in this case reputation or badges), even though that's not my intent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there an automatic reminder to question-askers if they have answers and they haven't accepted one after a given amount of time? If not, could this be implemented? Perhaps having a notification show up in the user's queue if there are 1 or more answers with 5 or more votes after a week, saying &quot;It looks like your question 'blah blah' still hasn't been answered&quot; and linking to the question might work. Or, should I just continue to leave polite comments about it and hope that works for people?" />
  <row Id="2928" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1461" RevisionGUID="05cf30c3-bd44-4146-9fa6-ba1aa5545d46" CreationDate="2010-09-19T01:23:42.890" UserId="20088" Text="Gentle reminders to mark an answer as accepted?" />
  <row Id="2929" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1461" RevisionGUID="05cf30c3-bd44-4146-9fa6-ba1aa5545d46" CreationDate="2010-09-19T01:23:42.890" UserId="20088" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2930" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1462" RevisionGUID="45c3dc60-8512-46c9-b818-da162217d98c" CreationDate="2010-09-19T07:04:21.470" UserId="20088" Text="While editing a post tonight I noticed this bug with the tags. There were two of the same tag (windows-7-x64), and several tags with 0 uses but still showing up. Seems broken, unless I'm missing something.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![double tags][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://c0848462.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/0d97cf189dd1ccc237d8b790fc3b3c3a.png" />
  <row Id="2931" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1462" RevisionGUID="45c3dc60-8512-46c9-b818-da162217d98c" CreationDate="2010-09-19T07:04:21.470" UserId="20088" Text="Bugs with tagging questions" />
  <row Id="2932" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1462" RevisionGUID="45c3dc60-8512-46c9-b818-da162217d98c" CreationDate="2010-09-19T07:04:21.470" UserId="20088" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="2933" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1463" RevisionGUID="1577d2ef-684f-4d1f-80a9-95bf0d7e158b" CreationDate="2010-09-19T13:51:24.207" UserId="25890" Text="For example, if the problem was resolved without answering the question, how do you deal with the question so that it doesn't remain opened. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps a device was replaced, or a different software was used in the end, and the question is now meaningless, yet the problem resolved. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's [an example][1] on superuser. Here's [another one][2] on stackoverflow, where the problem was in the question itself. How do you deal with those kind of questions? leaving them opened seems the wrong thing to do...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/189963/linux-network-speed-is-abysmally-slow-while-winxp-is-ok-why&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3447359/how-to-dynamically-compile-and-load-a-java-class-that-complies-to-an-interface-at" />
  <row Id="2934" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1463" RevisionGUID="1577d2ef-684f-4d1f-80a9-95bf0d7e158b" CreationDate="2010-09-19T13:51:24.207" UserId="25890" Text="how to deal with an answer that is resolved, but not answered?" />
  <row Id="2935" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1463" RevisionGUID="1577d2ef-684f-4d1f-80a9-95bf0d7e158b" CreationDate="2010-09-19T13:51:24.207" UserId="25890" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;close-reasons&gt;&lt;questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="2936" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1464" RevisionGUID="51a386c9-6b7f-498e-88b5-64a13524208a" CreationDate="2010-09-19T14:30:02.700" UserId="4386" Text="If it was resolved, write your own answer and mark it as the valid answer!" />
  <row Id="2937" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1465" RevisionGUID="85024e87-b7f6-46e7-b9c8-13921699403f" CreationDate="2010-09-19T19:31:35.210" UserId="4377" Text="In [this case][1] you can post the resolution as an answer and mark it as accepted.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you had to get it replaced, probably vote to close the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/189963/linux-network-speed-is-abysmally-slow-while-winxp-is-ok-why" />
  <row Id="2938" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1453" RevisionGUID="9e643377-9e9f-4e0f-b108-4603df40d3b0" CreationDate="2010-09-20T07:18:24.123" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="2939" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1466" RevisionGUID="c5c675e5-c597-4b5f-b55b-da54bc601938" CreationDate="2010-09-20T07:43:55.527" UserId="1" Text="This is covered a bit in [Podcast #58][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Joel says that the only bad simple question is a *duplicate* simple question. I say simple questions are OK as long as they’re actually interesting (in some way) for other users to consider and answer. To prove his point, Joel actually asks the question on Stack Overflow: How do I move the turtle in LOGO? Do you think this question adds value?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Naturally, I stand by my viewpoint: simple questions are only good if they're interesting to the people who will be answering them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Though in a way we are both correct, since almost by definition **a simple duplicate question is never interesting** , but I think it goes deeper than that -- what makes a question interesting? what's the difference between a simple *interesting* question and a simple *boring* question?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/06/podcast-58/" />
  <row Id="2940" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1467" RevisionGUID="cd34585c-c292-43c4-b696-37fd4c5836f1" CreationDate="2010-09-20T07:47:12.890" UserId="1" Text="This is temporary -- tags are cleaned up every 24 hours so it is possible for bad (not used, recently destroyed) tags to be in the system for a bit.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Notice that none of those [windows7-hide*] tags are present now.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The (s) tag you are seeing is a synonym, so people who insist on using the &quot;wrong&quot; form of a tag can find it; that tag will be auto-remapped to the synonym." />
  <row Id="2941" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1462" RevisionGUID="511097a6-cca2-4b7b-a6d4-5be29fb4fee7" CreationDate="2010-09-20T07:47:19.970" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="2942" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1450" RevisionGUID="4ffc8126-8e73-4056-8f51-0945355ac0a7" CreationDate="2010-09-20T07:48:08.163" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="2943" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1452" RevisionGUID="4c659617-2217-43ce-ba8d-f138fe6431e8" CreationDate="2010-09-20T07:48:28.287" UserId="1" Comment="added 84 characters in body" Text="it means a moderator renamed a tag. renames don't protect against dupes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In the future just flag this and I can run the global tag deduplication routine." />
  <row Id="2944" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1468" RevisionGUID="9987634a-c694-44eb-a62a-b11b6af0e8cf" CreationDate="2010-09-20T07:51:02.803" UserId="1" Text="&gt; I stumbled across this question on Which HDD brand do you ..trust which was closed due to the subjective nature of it. While I agree it is subjective, I can't help but wonder where so valuable a question such as this would fit in the Stack Exchange network of sites?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I simply cannot agree that this is a  &quot;valuable question&quot;, at all.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's like asking what politicians you trust, or what your favorite football team is.. just a bunch of personal opinion and anecdotes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps a better question might be &quot;how do I gather data to determine the reliability of hard drive brands?&quot; (and FYI the answer is largely that you can't, since models change so frequently and often have completely different reliability levels.)" />
  <row Id="2945" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1469" RevisionGUID="2256feae-3f21-4041-8668-0d8ecf1b0f68" CreationDate="2010-09-20T08:59:15.280" UserId="1" Text="We are no longer inferring display names from openids; if you want a display name you must set one.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is by design and will remain this way from this point onward.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. without a display name set nobody can @reply to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. it exposes part of your openid identifier." />
  <row Id="2946" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1437" RevisionGUID="669ebdd1-80bd-4ce7-8be1-1270b12256cb" CreationDate="2010-09-20T08:59:31.830" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;" />
  <row Id="2947" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1470" RevisionGUID="17f6dc8b-7870-4f08-a099-8e43dab92098" CreationDate="2010-09-20T12:01:31.130" UserId="39366" Text="Looking at the first version of [this](http://superuser.com/q/190663) question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The image link provided in the question points to an igmur URL, so probably was uploaded using the magic now built in to the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, should this be edited to show the image inline with the question?  &#xD;&#xA;I'm interesting generally, not just this specific question, so I can edit more effectively in the future." />
  <row Id="2948" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1470" RevisionGUID="17f6dc8b-7870-4f08-a099-8e43dab92098" CreationDate="2010-09-20T12:01:31.130" UserId="39366" Text="Should questions be edited to show images in-line?" />
  <row Id="2949" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1470" RevisionGUID="17f6dc8b-7870-4f08-a099-8e43dab92098" CreationDate="2010-09-20T12:01:31.130" UserId="39366" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;editing&gt;&lt;images&gt;" />
  <row Id="2950" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="11" RevisionGUID="5635bb02-6256-4f60-8236-1be1746ff896" CreationDate="2010-09-20T12:37:48.253" UserId="517" Comment="Using official name of the sites -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, &quot;Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name&quot;." Text="Stack Overflow and Server Fault are both clearly for problems in their respective fields. As such, why is Super User to be called Super User? Is it because it too begins with an S? What were other names that were under consideration?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2951" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="11" RevisionGUID="5635bb02-6256-4f60-8236-1be1746ff896" CreationDate="2010-09-20T12:37:48.253" UserId="517" Comment="Using official name of the sites -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, &quot;Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name&quot;." Text="Why call It Super User?" />
  <row Id="2952" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="11" RevisionGUID="5635bb02-6256-4f60-8236-1be1746ff896" CreationDate="2010-09-20T12:37:48.253" UserId="517" Comment="Using official name of the sites -see http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance, &quot;Proper Use of the Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange Name&quot;." Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="2953" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1470" RevisionGUID="bdffba91-8b55-4adc-8736-97b923d6e818" CreationDate="2010-09-20T13:17:49.713" UserId="39366" Comment="added 13 characters in body" Text="Looking at the first version of [this](http://superuser.com/q/190663) question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The image link provided in the question points to an igmur URL, so probably was uploaded using the magic now built in to the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, should this be edited to show the image inline with the question?  &#xD;&#xA;I'm interested in a general answer, not just for this specific question, so I can edit more effectively in the future." />
  <row Id="2954" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1471" RevisionGUID="5dcbdba4-34a8-4f01-b271-72749612f034" CreationDate="2010-09-20T15:38:22.483" UserId="20608" Text="I've seen questions about pirating software down voted and closed. I'm wondering if Hackintosh questions are also disallowed? If so, why?" />
  <row Id="2955" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1471" RevisionGUID="5dcbdba4-34a8-4f01-b271-72749612f034" CreationDate="2010-09-20T15:38:22.483" UserId="20608" Text="Are &quot;Hackintosh&quot; questions allowed?" />
  <row Id="2956" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1471" RevisionGUID="5dcbdba4-34a8-4f01-b271-72749612f034" CreationDate="2010-09-20T15:38:22.483" UserId="20608" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;&lt;hacking&gt;&lt;apple&gt;" />
  <row Id="2957" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1472" RevisionGUID="8474c6be-54ee-49ce-abf4-747cba790a7a" CreationDate="2010-09-20T16:24:40.327" UserId="6442" Text="Meta Super User never went through a painful creation process. Like Athena, it just popped into the world fully formed and ready for business. (Yes, Jeff Atwood is basically Zeus in this analogy. No, we're not going to pursue that thought.)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;MSU still has a &quot;Beta&quot; badge listed on its badge page, but nobody has ever earned such a badge, and nobody ever will. I request that it be stricken.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have submitted a similar request for Server Fault [here](http://meta.serverfault.com/questions/817/remove-msf-beta-badge).  &#xD;&#xA;It seems that [a similar request](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10931/wrong-text-for-beta-badge-on-meta/11027#11027) for Meta Stack Overflow was granted last year." />
  <row Id="2958" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1472" RevisionGUID="8474c6be-54ee-49ce-abf4-747cba790a7a" CreationDate="2010-09-20T16:24:40.327" UserId="6442" Text="Remove MSU Beta badge" />
  <row Id="2959" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1472" RevisionGUID="8474c6be-54ee-49ce-abf4-747cba790a7a" CreationDate="2010-09-20T16:24:40.327" UserId="6442" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;badges&gt;" />
  <row Id="2960" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1473" RevisionGUID="7282c775-549f-40a8-a129-ae6b201f6d62" CreationDate="2010-09-20T16:43:33.500" UserId="3981" Text="Simple. It's a legal grey area. Super User doesn't want to build a reputation for encouraging something that may or may not be illegal, so it was decided to stay safe rather then sorry.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I have actually proposed to have the tag banned [here](http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1381/banned-tag-proposal-hackintosh) and given some more reasons why." />
  <row Id="2961" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1474" RevisionGUID="8cd51567-c7e3-44f3-b56e-22c2191ad047" CreationDate="2010-09-20T16:48:44.830" UserId="4377" Text="Yes. I generally make it a point to ensure that if a question has an image link, then a preview/thumbnail of it is available. More often than not, it's enough to tell what's going on." />
  <row Id="2962" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1470" RevisionGUID="b6e4f6bd-81d9-47be-b1cf-10c306b3fee7" CreationDate="2010-09-20T16:51:52.123" UserId="4377" Comment="igmur ? no it's imgur!" Text="Looking at the first version of [this](http://superuser.com/q/190663) question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The image link provided in the question points to an imgur URL, so probably was uploaded using the magic now built in to the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, should this be edited to show the image inline with the question?  &#xD;&#xA;I'm interested in a general answer, not just for this specific question, so I can edit more effectively in the future." />
  <row Id="2963" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="12" RevisionGUID="5dd21cea-af98-40cd-bf8e-de89b29d2adb" CreationDate="2010-09-20T16:54:35.333" UserId="34844" Comment="added 53 characters in body" Text="I think it might have to do with the [other name for root][1]. I suppose they could have called it root...but that would have sucked, IMO.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That, and yes, it begins with an S and has a nice acronym (SU). IIRC, the su in the nix [sudo command][2] used to mean superuser (today it's an acronym for &quot;substitute user&quot;)...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So it's just nice all around.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_user&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudo" />
  <row Id="2964" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1448" RevisionGUID="1fce03c1-11d3-41ae-a3fe-a916decabc60" CreationDate="2010-09-20T21:16:49.993" UserId="23420" Comment="fixed some random pasting" Text="I think it's safe to assume that people who don't know what a terminal is will probably end up on a forum like the [Windows 7 Forums](http://www.sevenforums.com/) anyway. Why can I assume this? Here are two prime examples:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Exhibit A&#xD;&#xA;=&#xD;&#xA;![I love the Welcome banner](http://desmond.yfrog.com/Himg201/scaled.php?tn=0&amp;server=201&amp;filename=selection001j.png&amp;xsize=640&amp;ysize=640)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Exhibit B&#xD;&#xA;=&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  **Person 1**: Hey bud, I was wondering if you could help me change the wallpaper on my new laptop thing?  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  **Person 2**: Yikes, I'm gonna have to say you're going to have to check SuperUser, it's pretty tough.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;v.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;  **Person 1**: HELP ME FRIEND!!! MY MOUSE REACHED THE END OF THE MOUSEPAD AND NOW I CAN'T USE IT!!! HELP!!!  &#xD;&#xA;&gt;  **Person 2**: Calm down, we'll do this quickly and swiftly. I'll check on Google. (20 seconds later) Apparently all you have to do is *pick up* the mouse and put it back on the mousepad.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Which one is more realistic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That said, more complicated questions that are still Googleable (e.g. finding the best antivirus), they should be answered anyway because SuperUser is also part wiki." />
  <row Id="2965" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1475" RevisionGUID="b9621e37-d969-480b-b97b-036842376788" CreationDate="2010-09-20T22:13:00.503" UserId="1" Text="This post is to document the **week 4** winners of the [Super User Super Contest][contest], for the week ending **Monday, September 13**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Congratulations to our winners this week!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [Best rookie][suleague] performance by [**Linker3000**][rookie]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. [Highest reputation][suleague] produced by [**Wil**][toprep]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![top users week of 08-30-2010][topreppic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Best meta post:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [how to deal with an answer that is resolved, but not answered?][bestmeta] by [**brice**][bestmetauser]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Most awesome new question or answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [SSH: Why doesn't &quot;get&quot; command work?][bestweek] answer by [**Spiff**][bestweekuser]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are contacting the winners now, so be sure to check your email inboxes!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[contest]:      http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/super-user-1-year-anniversary-super-contest/&#xD;&#xA;[suleague]:     http://stackexchange.com/leagues/3/week/superuser/2010-09-13&#xD;&#xA;[topreppic]:    http://imgur.com/6Fp3Y.png&#xD;&#xA;[bestweek]:     http://superuser.com/questions/188411/ssh-why-doesnt-get-command-work/188433#188433&#xD;&#xA;[bestweekuser]: http://superuser.com/users/2130/rcix&#xD;&#xA;[bestmeta]:     http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1463/how-to-deal-with-an-answer-that-is-resolved-but-not-answered&#xD;&#xA;[bestmetauser]: http://meta.superuser.com/users/25890/brice&#xD;&#xA;[rookie]:       http://superuser.com/users/49199/linker3000&#xD;&#xA;[toprep]:       http://superuser.com/users/4386/wil" />
  <row Id="2966" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1475" RevisionGUID="b9621e37-d969-480b-b97b-036842376788" CreationDate="2010-09-20T22:13:00.503" UserId="1" Text="Super Contest Winners: Week 4" />
  <row Id="2967" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1475" RevisionGUID="b9621e37-d969-480b-b97b-036842376788" CreationDate="2010-09-20T22:13:00.503" UserId="1" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;super-contest&gt;" />
  <row Id="2968" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1475" RevisionGUID="abe29be3-7f9c-4af5-95d6-bf40ca4bc64c" CreationDate="2010-09-20T22:22:00.687" UserId="1" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="This post is to document the **week 4** winners of the [Super User Super Contest][contest], for the week ending **Monday, September 13**.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Congratulations to our winners this week!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;1. [Best rookie][suleague] performance by [**Linker3000**][rookie]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. [Highest reputation][suleague] produced by [**Wil**][toprep]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   ![top users week of 08-30-2010][topreppic]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;3. Best meta post:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [how to deal with an answer that is resolved, but not answered?][bestmeta] by [**brice**][bestmetauser]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;4. Most awesome new question or answer:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;   [SSH: Why doesn't &quot;get&quot; command work?][bestweek] answer by [**Spiff**][bestweekuser]  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We are contacting the winners now, so be sure to check your email inboxes!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[contest]:      http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/super-user-1-year-anniversary-super-contest/&#xD;&#xA;[suleague]:     http://stackexchange.com/leagues/3/week/superuser/2010-09-13&#xD;&#xA;[topreppic]:    http://imgur.com/6Fp3Y.png&#xD;&#xA;[bestweek]:     http://superuser.com/questions/188411/ssh-why-doesnt-get-command-work/188433#188433&#xD;&#xA;[bestweekuser]: http://superuser.com/users/30792/spiff&#xD;&#xA;[bestmeta]:     http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1463/how-to-deal-with-an-answer-that-is-resolved-but-not-answered&#xD;&#xA;[bestmetauser]: http://meta.superuser.com/users/25890/brice&#xD;&#xA;[rookie]:       http://superuser.com/users/49199/linker3000&#xD;&#xA;[toprep]:       http://superuser.com/users/4386/wil" />
  <row Id="2969" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1476" RevisionGUID="77ffe6dc-0313-40ce-8619-70855ae2283c" CreationDate="2010-09-20T23:43:13.100" UserId="1" Text="On chat.meta.stackoverflow, there's a little easter egg where text entered as&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; [status-blah]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;will be rendered as a moderator only tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We'd like to do something similar, but specific to superuser -- namely, **when you type a magic string, something amusing and in-joke-y for *superuser.com* happens**, and it's visible to the entire chat room.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do you have any ideas for anything super-user-y we can do as an easter egg in chat.superuser.com ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Answer here, or in the dedicated chat room for this topic at http://chat.superuser.com/rooms/14/pick-a-meme" />
  <row Id="2970" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1476" RevisionGUID="77ffe6dc-0313-40ce-8619-70855ae2283c" CreationDate="2010-09-20T23:43:13.100" UserId="1" Text="Pick an easter egg for chat.superuser!" />
  <row Id="2971" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1476" RevisionGUID="77ffe6dc-0313-40ce-8619-70855ae2283c" CreationDate="2010-09-20T23:43:13.100" UserId="1" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;chat&gt;" />
  <row Id="2972" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1477" RevisionGUID="b200ef5e-b229-4c22-97a6-c50c0e854f95" CreationDate="2010-09-20T23:54:24.757" UserId="4377" Text="Just to ensure the discussions on chat are not lost.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;via @Ivo Links: [1], [2], [3], [4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; yeah it's pretty universal.&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Anyone who dares press the send button in the interface&#xD;&#xA;&gt; should get an error with [this comic][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://chat.superuser.com/transcript/message/9786&#xD;&#xA; [2]: http://chat.superuser.com/transcript/message/9789&#xD;&#xA; [3]: http://chat.superuser.com/transcript/message/9790&#xD;&#xA; [4]: http://chat.superuser.com/transcript/message/9793&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://geeksaresexy.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/computeruse2.gif&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2973" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1477" RevisionGUID="b200ef5e-b229-4c22-97a6-c50c0e854f95" CreationDate="2010-09-20T23:54:24.757" UserId="4377" />
  <row Id="2974" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1478" RevisionGUID="3b108fe4-e1df-4074-9a11-e40fbefe4240" CreationDate="2010-09-20T23:54:55.973" UserId="4377" Text="via [@JNK][6]&#xD;&#xA;  &gt; AIt would be funny if anytime anyone said recursion it linked to the google search for recursion, which is in itself hilarious&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [6]: http://chat.superuser.com/transcript/message/7119" />
  <row Id="2975" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1478" RevisionGUID="3b108fe4-e1df-4074-9a11-e40fbefe4240" CreationDate="2010-09-20T23:54:55.973" UserId="4377" />
  <row Id="2976" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1479" RevisionGUID="ad3e99ed-3f40-41ab-b49d-42c563b6c740" CreationDate="2010-09-20T23:55:56.733" UserId="4377" Text="via [@balpha][7]:&#xD;&#xA; &gt; how about this: When the message matches /^how (?:can|do) I (.+)\?/i, a talking paper clip appears with a speech bubble saying &quot;It looks like you're trying to \1. Do you want some help?&quot; and a link to SU&#xD;&#xA; [7]: http://chat.superuser.com/transcript/message/7326&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2977" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1479" RevisionGUID="ad3e99ed-3f40-41ab-b49d-42c563b6c740" CreationDate="2010-09-20T23:55:56.733" UserId="4377" />
  <row Id="2978" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1479" RevisionGUID="2dd9371a-b210-45ec-acfc-3ec163604930" CreationDate="2010-09-21T02:25:37.223" UserId="1" Comment="added 189 characters in body" Text="via [@balpha][7]:&#xD;&#xA; &gt; how about this: When the message matches /^how (?:can|do) I (.+)\?/i, a talking paper clip appears with a speech bubble saying &quot;It looks like you're trying to \1. Do you want some help?&quot; and a link to SU&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;ala&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;img src=&quot;http://codinghorror.typepad.com/.a/6a0120a85dcdae970b0128777020a7970c-pi&quot;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;from:  &#xD;&#xA;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/11/dont-forget-to-lock-your-computer.html&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [7]: http://chat.superuser.com/transcript/message/7326&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2979" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1480" RevisionGUID="6b986f1d-0c9b-4085-a234-d0478dc41f8f" CreationDate="2010-09-21T02:43:32.887" UserId="23420" Text="For anyone who wants a lame one: &#xD;&#xA;!!!! -&gt; Crazy seizure-inducing banner ad." />
  <row Id="2980" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1481" RevisionGUID="d7cfac74-9b66-410a-9a82-dc70b86df173" CreationDate="2010-09-21T10:47:05.537" UserId="37629" Text="How about involving the term&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Have you tried turning it off and on again?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;.. for random questions? Not sure if it would work, but that quote solves about 90% of the questions right? :-)  &#xD;&#xA;(perhaps it would fit better on [serverfault][1] though)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://www.serverfault.com" />
  <row Id="2981" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1482" RevisionGUID="d1cc3a25-f561-4660-a358-d8be26108801" CreationDate="2010-09-21T11:59:47.537" UserId="33300" Text="How about something I am using in subversion comments for a long time:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Bunny appreciates this code  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; (\ /)  &#xD;&#xA;&gt; (O.o)   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; (&gt; &lt;)   &#xD;&#xA;&gt; Don´t mess with bunny!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It is editable so bunny can appreciate everything you do ;-)" />
  <row Id="2982" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1483" RevisionGUID="3dad54f9-53e8-43f9-9bd6-9d77eeaae781" CreationDate="2010-09-21T12:30:07.207" UserId="4377" Text="Congrats to the winners :D&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![close][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://i.imgur.com/1whAE.png" />
  <row Id="2983" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1435" RevisionGUID="59896b22-5e0a-4ada-90d2-54931c79651c" CreationDate="2010-09-21T12:33:05.250" UserId="4377" Comment="added 10 characters in body; deleted 10 characters in body" Text="Congrats to the winners :D&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![close][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://i.imgur.com/1whAE.png" />
  <row Id="2984" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1445" RevisionGUID="9d0cba91-4402-4600-b10d-28028b1894c6" CreationDate="2010-09-21T15:35:18.690" UserId="41423" Comment="added 18 characters in body; deleted 18 characters in body" Text="To put it another way: can we assume that someone who asks a question on Superuser has tried to find the answer elsewhere first?  For many (most?) people, the first step in finding an answer to just about any question is Google.  If an answer can be found easily on Google, does that make it **too** easy for Superuser?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Do we want Superuser to become the first place people go for answers to questions related to computer use?  Does SU 'compete' with Google in that sense?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Certainly, the quality of the answers on SU often exceeds what can be found elsewhere, and the idea of SU being more relevant than Google for finding answers in itself sounds appealing.  But in practice, if SU becomes everyone's first stop for solving computer use problems, we're going to see a lot of questions that are incredibly basic.  Is that a problem?  Perhaps not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my question comes down to this: are there questions that are too easy for Superuser?  If so, how should such questions be handled?  If not, then it should be interesting to see what happens to the quality of SU questions as the site becomes more popular.  If the SU moderators spend all their time reframing Google search results in easy-to-consume packages, the task might grow wearisome." />
  <row Id="2985" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1484" RevisionGUID="15d805a0-1d5b-4883-8451-878fb9d53e82" CreationDate="2010-09-21T15:58:09.407" UserDisplayName="or100" Text="Why am I getting the following message in stackoverflow ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Oops! Your question couldn't be submitted because:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Sorry, we are no longer accepting questions from this account. " />
  <row Id="2986" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1484" RevisionGUID="15d805a0-1d5b-4883-8451-878fb9d53e82" CreationDate="2010-09-21T15:58:09.407" UserDisplayName="or100" Text="Sorry, we are no longer accepting questions from this account message in stackoverflow" />
  <row Id="2987" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1484" RevisionGUID="15d805a0-1d5b-4883-8451-878fb9d53e82" CreationDate="2010-09-21T15:58:09.407" UserDisplayName="or100" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;questions-and-answers&gt;" />
  <row Id="2988" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1484" RevisionGUID="9e328521-8921-495f-b37b-1bcd8b593c11" CreationDate="2010-09-21T18:19:57.560" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/191150/sorry-we-are-no-longer-accepting-questions-from-this-account-message-in-stackove" Text="" />
  <row Id="2989" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1485" RevisionGUID="d23aa701-08b3-498f-845a-bab8f58f3ac2" CreationDate="2010-09-22T13:52:05.937" UserId="43645" Text="Not sure if this should be here or meta.SO, but...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A really handy feature for me, and I assume others, would be the option to see **ONLY** questions tagged with your tags, but in chronological order." />
  <row Id="2990" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1485" RevisionGUID="d23aa701-08b3-498f-845a-bab8f58f3ac2" CreationDate="2010-09-22T13:52:05.937" UserId="43645" Text="Newest questions with YOUR TAGS only" />
  <row Id="2991" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1485" RevisionGUID="d23aa701-08b3-498f-845a-bab8f58f3ac2" CreationDate="2010-09-22T13:52:05.937" UserId="43645" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="2992" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1486" RevisionGUID="a22d1ec2-17cc-4423-babe-03a434862adc" CreationDate="2010-09-22T15:42:03.403" UserId="5003" Text="The new Announcer badge says:&#xD;&#xA;Shared a link to a question that was visited by 50 unique IP addresses in 2 days&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But how do they know who posted the link?  If I post a Superuser link to reddit.com how do they know that it was me who posted it and that I should get the credit?  There isn't really a referral system." />
  <row Id="2993" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1486" RevisionGUID="a22d1ec2-17cc-4423-babe-03a434862adc" CreationDate="2010-09-22T15:42:03.403" UserId="5003" Text="How do you get the new Announcer Badge?" />
  <row Id="2994" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1486" RevisionGUID="a22d1ec2-17cc-4423-babe-03a434862adc" CreationDate="2010-09-22T15:42:03.403" UserId="5003" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;badges&gt;" />
  <row Id="2995" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1486" RevisionGUID="59bf7cc3-31bd-4d8e-b242-bd787d0f5f36" CreationDate="2010-09-22T15:51:30.940" UserId="5003" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; edited title; added 10 characters in body" Text="The Announcer badge says:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Shared a link to a question that was visited by 50 unique IP addresses in 2 days&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But how do they know who posted the link?  If I post a Superuser link to reddit.com how do they know that it was me who posted it and that I should get the credit?  There isn't really a referral system.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="2996" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1486" RevisionGUID="59bf7cc3-31bd-4d8e-b242-bd787d0f5f36" CreationDate="2010-09-22T15:51:30.940" UserId="5003" Comment="deleted 2 characters in body; edited title; added 10 characters in body" Text="How do you get the Announcer Badge?" />
  <row Id="2997" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1487" RevisionGUID="50185521-dece-4cb3-91ff-c165a2db7031" CreationDate="2010-09-22T16:16:37.883" UserId="4377" Text="Announcer badge is not applicable to Super User." />
  <row Id="2998" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1485" RevisionGUID="c9072c7c-a1d2-494b-8252-e4cdf4a11729" CreationDate="2010-09-22T19:35:07.707" UserId="4527" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;interesting-tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="2999" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1488" RevisionGUID="9c9378ff-cf50-4407-950b-484be6837a23" CreationDate="2010-09-22T20:14:37.937" UserId="307" Text="When you're logged in you'll see that the actual link for questions is a shortened version.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On this question, it looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://meta.superuser.com/q/1486/307&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Grab and post that link to other sites and when you hit the necessary levels of referrals, you'll get your badges. The referral ID is your UserId.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You don't have to be logged in to get that link. Just know your user ID (it's the first number on your profile URI) and swap out the question ID.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basic format of the link you'll want to share if you want that Announcer/Booster/Publicist badge.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://superuser.com/q/[QuestionId]/[UserId]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's another example:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    http://superuser.com/q/2/5003&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Sidenote: &#xD;&#xA;- You can't get Booster until you've already gotten Announcer. &#xD;&#xA;- You can't get Publicist unless you've already gotten Booster. &#xD;&#xA;- You can't get these badges for the same question.&#xD;&#xA;- Only applies to questions, doesn't work for answers.&#xD;&#xA;- Does not come with fur coat, cane or fedora." />
  <row Id="3000" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1489" RevisionGUID="f2ab9829-0bb7-4ff1-bd55-033b8649f5b3" CreationDate="2010-09-22T20:23:06.153" UserId="1156" Text="I think maybe a more persuasive approach, such as banning a user may be called for. I have viewed several profiles where multiple questions have been asked without a single accepted answer. Accepting answers not only rewards those providing the answer, but allows visitors to the questions to quickly see the solution. Users that repeatedly ask questions without accepting correct answers are not maintaining their responsibilities to the forum." />
  <row Id="3001" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1490" RevisionGUID="58f1203b-3331-4097-b095-477d275aa831" CreationDate="2010-09-22T22:23:28.723" UserId="36565" Text="![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is all we have at the moment, a small notice on the user profile, which a user that doesn't understand the accept system probably wouldn't look at anyways.&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/DcgK0.png" />
  <row Id="3002" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1487" RevisionGUID="967626fd-7cf9-4546-8c16-ecee9a155d46" CreationDate="2010-09-22T23:02:40.923" UserId="4377" Comment="added 55 characters in body" Text="&lt;s&gt;Announcer badge is not applicable to Super User.&lt;/s&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Apparently, it is applicable, just hidden :P" />
  <row Id="3003" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1491" RevisionGUID="78db2ae6-f711-43b6-934d-885d1a32d9d3" CreationDate="2010-09-23T08:11:31.910" UserId="49981" Text="Some days ago, I posted [this question](http://superuser.com/questions/191028/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is a cross-post from Ubuntu SE. [The question](http://ubuntu.stackexchange.com/questions/4422/) has also been answered. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I now know that cross-posting is discouraged. However, _I think_ it belongs here. IMO, The options for dealing with are as follows:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;2. Close the question as being exact duplicate of the Ubuntu SE question.&#xD;&#xA;1. Answer the question with link to the Ubuntu SE answer and accept it.&#xD;&#xA;3. Migrate from Ubuntu SE into SU.&#xD;&#xA;4. Close / delete this question and let the question+answer remain in Ubuntu SE. This is the preferred option is consensus opinion is that it belongs more in Ubuntu SE than SU.&#xD;&#xA;5. Anything else ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can u pls help me decide what the next step should be ?&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3004" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1491" RevisionGUID="78db2ae6-f711-43b6-934d-885d1a32d9d3" CreationDate="2010-09-23T08:11:31.910" UserId="49981" Text="How to deal with a cross-posted question which belongs to SU ?" />
  <row Id="3005" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1491" RevisionGUID="78db2ae6-f711-43b6-934d-885d1a32d9d3" CreationDate="2010-09-23T08:11:31.910" UserId="49981" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;migration&gt;&lt;duplicates&gt;" />
  <row Id="3006" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1492" RevisionGUID="0e45d636-098d-4e3b-aa23-e7ded9e06fcf" CreationDate="2010-09-23T09:11:58.667" UserId="1548" Text="Until new SE-site are out of beta, there's no way to migrate or refer to them, so all those options are off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Referring to the current url might create dead links over time, so I wouldn't encourage that either. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also remember that our main access point is Google, so it doesn't on what site it's at, as long as there's a great answer to the question **somewhere** on our network of sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So my advice, don't worry and have fun over at Ubuntu SE :-)" />
  <row Id="3007" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1493" RevisionGUID="bc8401c9-9b76-4ad3-a7f4-dd6b8a1f5c8e" CreationDate="2010-09-23T13:19:03.317" UserId="1686" Text="[This question](http://superuser.com/questions/191750/) has been migrated from StackOverflow - and apparently back. Both sites show the question as closed, but the close reason is not displayed anywhere.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![Question](http://imgur.com/gqEu7.jpg)" />
  <row Id="3008" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1493" RevisionGUID="bc8401c9-9b76-4ad3-a7f4-dd6b8a1f5c8e" CreationDate="2010-09-23T13:19:03.317" UserId="1686" Text="Close reason not shown?" />
  <row Id="3009" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1493" RevisionGUID="bc8401c9-9b76-4ad3-a7f4-dd6b8a1f5c8e" CreationDate="2010-09-23T13:19:03.317" UserId="1686" Text="&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="3010" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1493" RevisionGUID="9acb8475-33ca-4c87-8d08-a92f99d9d761" CreationDate="2010-09-23T17:01:25.347" UserId="307" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;close-reasons&gt;" />
  <row Id="3011" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1494" RevisionGUID="8e8a1d3c-edd9-4a13-8eba-d36802f74e83" CreationDate="2010-09-23T19:56:57.893" UserId="36601" Text="Hi!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question 192061 won't open in Firefox 3.6.10 on windows 7 64 bit. It works fine in Internet Explorer and Safari 4.0.5 (531.22.7)" />
  <row Id="3012" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1494" RevisionGUID="8e8a1d3c-edd9-4a13-8eba-d36802f74e83" CreationDate="2010-09-23T19:56:57.893" UserId="36601" Text="Question 192061 won't open in Firefox 3.6.10 on windows 7 64 bit." />
  <row Id="3013" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1494" RevisionGUID="8e8a1d3c-edd9-4a13-8eba-d36802f74e83" CreationDate="2010-09-23T19:56:57.893" UserId="36601" Text="&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="3014" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1494" RevisionGUID="03d82f6c-8bd5-4b24-99ef-0417cb0f1b92" CreationDate="2010-09-23T20:03:17.127" UserId="36601" Comment="added 32 characters in body; added 55 characters in body" Text="Hi!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Question [192061][1] won't open in Firefox 3.6.10 on windows 7 64 bit. It seems to be loading forever. It works fine in Internet Explorer and Safari 4.0.5 (531.22.7)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/192061" />
  <row Id="3015" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1495" RevisionGUID="6d34169e-e10d-4cf2-a97c-bcf55b5304b3" CreationDate="2010-09-23T21:15:43.730" UserId="1548" Text="My guess is that is was migrated back to SO, but this normally shouldn't happen, so it's displaying the first migration rather than the most recent one" />
  <row Id="3016" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1496" RevisionGUID="eaa29173-6e11-4969-b7e0-85faaeb4884f" CreationDate="2010-09-23T23:04:33.420" UserId="23420" Text="What exactly is the point of the &lt;kbd&gt;Add Another Answer&lt;/kbd&gt; button? What would we need to do with it that we can't do buy adding another clause to our already existing answer?" />
  <row Id="3017" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1496" RevisionGUID="eaa29173-6e11-4969-b7e0-85faaeb4884f" CreationDate="2010-09-23T23:04:33.420" UserId="23420" Text="Add Another Answer—Why?" />
  <row Id="3018" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1496" RevisionGUID="eaa29173-6e11-4969-b7e0-85faaeb4884f" CreationDate="2010-09-23T23:04:33.420" UserId="23420" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;answers&gt;" />
  <row Id="3019" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1497" RevisionGUID="f972d674-0603-4f42-aa0e-f12e90a7dc9e" CreationDate="2010-09-23T23:10:01.217" UserId="40218" Text="I believe it is there to remind answerers that they already have answered that question. On questions with lots of answers, or questions with lots of answers that have been revived after a multi-month fallow period, it's not impossible to forget you've already answered a question. It happened to me once :}" />
  <row Id="3020" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1498" RevisionGUID="4dc8e5bd-3b94-420b-a5f9-495a12dc8929" CreationDate="2010-09-24T01:31:15.553" UserId="36565" Text="Working for me:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; **Windows NT 6.1**; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100914 **Firefox/3.6.10**" />
  <row Id="3021" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1496" RevisionGUID="fbce44ed-3a7b-4eb8-8359-5b72d050c8bf" CreationDate="2010-09-24T06:27:09.760" UserId="34844" Comment="deleted 1 characters in body" Text="What exactly is the point of the &lt;kbd&gt;Add Another Answer&lt;/kbd&gt; button? What would we need to do with it that we can't do by adding another clause to our already existing answer?" />
  <row Id="3022" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1499" RevisionGUID="996c6421-7399-47e6-942f-47a09ef3c20f" CreationDate="2010-09-24T06:43:22.567" UserId="1548" Text="If you have a really different approach to solve something, you can given another answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Why? Because our engine is designed to let the best answers float to the top. If you have two answers in one, it's unclear for others seeing the question which of the two solutions is the best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So **if** you have a better solution than you previously had: answer it again" />
  <row Id="3023" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1500" RevisionGUID="2b278793-8ce2-4e50-b46b-f4ac0dec479d" CreationDate="2010-09-24T06:50:26.360" UserId="2013" Text="Sometimes you see a question &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; How do I do ***$thing*** using ***$app***.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;First you answer the question.  &#xD;&#xA;A while later you think to yourself *Why is he using **$app** to do **$thing**, he should be using **$otherapp** instead.* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So you add another answer and let the other users decide witch is best.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3024" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1501" RevisionGUID="14e6d689-ceb1-4630-9cda-bf71f20c3d84" CreationDate="2010-09-24T18:01:21.193" UserId="7597" Text="I've been thinking about getting a netbook as a supplement to my laptop, which would be my primary computer. I have some criteria for the netbook, but am not too fixated on brand or model. I browsed the netbook tag on SuperUser, and noticed a number of similar questions have been closed, indicating that SuperUser is not for shopping advice.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There are some number of questions with responses, but seem to be a bit old. I imagine the netbook market has changed some since then, so was poised to ask a question with my specific criteria. But if SuperUser is not the place for it, where should I go for feedback on my needs?" />
  <row Id="3025" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1501" RevisionGUID="14e6d689-ceb1-4630-9cda-bf71f20c3d84" CreationDate="2010-09-24T18:01:21.193" UserId="7597" Text="Asking for netbook recommendation" />
  <row Id="3026" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1501" RevisionGUID="14e6d689-ceb1-4630-9cda-bf71f20c3d84" CreationDate="2010-09-24T18:01:21.193" UserId="7597" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="3027" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1502" RevisionGUID="a59da05a-becf-42b2-b6f6-1482e38c47dc" CreationDate="2010-09-24T23:16:35.593" UserId="820" Text="You are correct in being hesitant in asking your question.  It is off-topic and would be closed, much like the others you have already found.  As for where to ask your question, we may not be able to help you.  You can look around over at http://stackexchange.com, but AFAIK there are no shopping recommendation sites there." />
  <row Id="3029" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1504" RevisionGUID="bf29868b-7616-4bd8-a084-0035c3ed6f2b" CreationDate="2010-09-25T21:26:49.190" UserId="307" Text="When an account has been posting low quality content, this warning will appear.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions from the account have been downvoted by the community due to their overall poor quality, lack of effort or variants thereof.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To rectify this you can try and edit your earlier questions to be more clear, include more and relevant information or less inflammatory. " />
  <row Id="3030" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1484" RevisionGUID="56fd6203-7f97-4075-9335-94ed585778c0" CreationDate="2010-09-25T21:27:26.910" UserId="307" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;new-users&gt;" />
  <row Id="3031" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1505" RevisionGUID="7c1aaec6-45e3-4c73-b3ed-86d091a9313d" CreationDate="2010-09-26T07:47:08.210" UserId="265" Text="The [[homework]][2] tag is a meta-tag, which is [explicitly discouraged][2].  Should we delete the homework tag from all questions?  Although a question may be about homework, there's nothing useful gained by tagging a question &quot;homework&quot;.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/homework" />
  <row Id="3032" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1505" RevisionGUID="7c1aaec6-45e3-4c73-b3ed-86d091a9313d" CreationDate="2010-09-26T07:47:08.210" UserId="265" Text="Should we delete the [homework] tag?" />
  <row Id="3033" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1505" RevisionGUID="7c1aaec6-45e3-4c73-b3ed-86d091a9313d" CreationDate="2010-09-26T07:47:08.210" UserId="265" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="3034" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1506" RevisionGUID="5b9584a4-7ee3-4e79-b32d-f683c8c57046" CreationDate="2010-09-26T08:48:36.983" UserId="3981" Text="**No**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The [homework] tag is one of the few meta tags still allowed since we welcome homework question on the Trilogy.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More on the [homework] tag on MSO [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/60422/is-homework-an-exception).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More on the homework topic on MSO [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/10811/how-to-ask-and-answer-homework-questions)." />
  <row Id="3035" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1507" RevisionGUID="9033febb-194a-4167-bdf5-7da0da3aa476" CreationDate="2010-09-26T21:56:24.420" UserId="2013" Text="Yes. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;More on why to remove it on [MSO][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/60422/is-homework-an-exception/60429#60429" />
  <row Id="3036" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1508" RevisionGUID="a4df41ce-c588-4327-ad58-e2aab4f9e4bc" CreationDate="2010-09-27T03:57:44.577" UserId="7493" Text="Seems like more or less the same thing, 3 questions on one and 10 questions on the other.  I can manually merge if no one objects." />
  <row Id="3037" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1508" RevisionGUID="a4df41ce-c588-4327-ad58-e2aab4f9e4bc" CreationDate="2010-09-27T03:57:44.577" UserId="7493" Text="Tag merge - [disconnect] and [disconnects]" />
  <row Id="3038" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1508" RevisionGUID="a4df41ce-c588-4327-ad58-e2aab4f9e4bc" CreationDate="2010-09-27T03:57:44.577" UserId="7493" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="3044" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1512" RevisionGUID="6171765d-56bd-4e7c-8deb-116243c9ba09" CreationDate="2010-09-27T15:23:02.380" UserId="36601" Text="  &#xD;&#xA;Interesting thing is that after I answered from IE, it started to work fine in Firefox. " />
  <row Id="3045" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1508" RevisionGUID="6a02464a-73c0-423b-9d03-2f391368a087" CreationDate="2010-09-27T20:00:12.713" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;retag-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="3046" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1513" RevisionGUID="9fa41de9-ef7e-420f-b6ec-128480e901d3" CreationDate="2010-09-27T23:48:22.450" UserId="2573" Text="I have noticed a lot of questions that are answered correctly and abandoned by the OP (i.e. they are not marked as accepted by the OP)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can we have a voting system, where users above a particular reputation *(say 1000-2000 or whatever suitable)* can vote to accept such answers, maybe with a reason as to why they think that it would be the correct resolution the that particular problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm just thinking out loud here, we can add to this suggestion if wanted." />
  <row Id="3047" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1513" RevisionGUID="9fa41de9-ef7e-420f-b6ec-128480e901d3" CreationDate="2010-09-27T23:48:22.450" UserId="2573" Text="Community Voting System to accept answers not accepted by the OP" />
  <row Id="3048" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1513" RevisionGUID="9fa41de9-ef7e-420f-b6ec-128480e901d3" CreationDate="2010-09-27T23:48:22.450" UserId="2573" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;users&gt;&lt;voting&gt;&lt;accepted-answer&gt;" />
  <row Id="3049" PostHistoryTypeId="10" PostId="1513" RevisionGUID="b95acdd4-32e2-403f-86bc-de737949d7cd" CreationDate="2010-09-28T08:49:40.213" UserId="-1" CloseReasonId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:4377,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Sathya&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:820,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;heavyd&quot;},{&quot;Id&quot;:3981,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Diago&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3050" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1513" RevisionGUID="fe11cad6-1763-406c-b07a-7c348d2ced76" CreationDate="2010-09-28T08:49:40.387" UserId="-1" Comment="insert duplicate link" Text="&gt; **Possible Duplicate:**  &#xA;&gt; [Community bumping [status-completed] on meta.SU?](http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1305/community-bumping-status-completed-on-meta-su)  &#xA;&#xA;&lt;!-- End of automatically inserted text --&gt;&#xA;&#xA;I have noticed a lot of questions that are answered correctly and abandoned by the OP (i.e. they are not marked as accepted by the OP)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Can we have a voting system, where users above a particular reputation *(say 1000-2000 or whatever suitable)* can vote to accept such answers, maybe with a reason as to why they think that it would be the correct resolution the that particular problem.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm just thinking out loud here, we can add to this suggestion if wanted." />
  <row Id="3052" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1514" RevisionGUID="1062c2da-6293-4c33-8c71-54464e129926" CreationDate="2010-09-29T10:13:46.750" UserId="36601" Text="In my answer [here][1], I was explaining about [Internationalized country code top-level domains][2]. Unfortunately, standard links for some reason do not allow users to click on such links. Such addresses are valid, so I believe that this is a bug which needs to be fixed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/193931/how-do-people-type-different-languages-into-computer/193959#193959&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_country_code_top-level_domain" />
  <row Id="3053" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1514" RevisionGUID="1062c2da-6293-4c33-8c71-54464e129926" CreationDate="2010-09-29T10:13:46.750" UserId="36601" Text="Super User does not decets links which use internationalized domain names." />
  <row Id="3054" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1514" RevisionGUID="1062c2da-6293-4c33-8c71-54464e129926" CreationDate="2010-09-29T10:13:46.750" UserId="36601" Text="&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="3055" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1514" RevisionGUID="4e837509-282b-4ec0-a4e1-d4f246f0251e" CreationDate="2010-09-29T10:21:44.757" UserId="36601" Comment="edited title" Text="Super User does not detect links which use internationalized domain names." />
  <row Id="3057" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1514" RevisionGUID="90417cfd-53d0-4b2a-8b1b-271ecb10b09b" CreationDate="2010-09-29T18:21:34.573" UserId="4377" Comment="added 12 characters in body; edited tags" Text="In my answer [here][1], I was explaining about [Internationalized country code top-level domains][2]. Unfortunately, standard links for some reason do not allow users to click on such links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Such addresses are valid, so I believe that this is a bug which needs to be fixed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/193931/how-do-people-type-different-languages-into-computer/193959#193959&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_country_code_top-level_domain&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="3058" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1514" RevisionGUID="90417cfd-53d0-4b2a-8b1b-271ecb10b09b" CreationDate="2010-09-29T18:21:34.573" UserId="4377" Comment="added 12 characters in body; edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;hyperlinks&gt;&lt;unicode&gt;" />
  <row Id="3059" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1515" RevisionGUID="12ae4d86-1175-4495-8422-67b7abedbaff" CreationDate="2010-09-30T15:21:44.633" UserId="4377" Text="It's unbelievable that Super User is used as a dumping ground especially from for questions not on-topic on Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Latest example:&#xD;&#xA; http://superuser.com/questions/194442/recommended-spam-best-practices&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**Recommended Spam Best Practices**&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Are there any recommended admin tools or interfaces for reviewing and moderating spam on a community-driven UGC site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't see what's the point in bringing them over to here and then closing it and have it cleaned by the mods/10k users. Why not just close it as off-topic in Stack Overflow itself ?" />
  <row Id="3060" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1515" RevisionGUID="12ae4d86-1175-4495-8422-67b7abedbaff" CreationDate="2010-09-30T15:21:44.633" UserId="4377" Text="Why are questions off-topic for Super User being migrated from other trilogy sites?" />
  <row Id="3061" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1515" RevisionGUID="12ae4d86-1175-4495-8422-67b7abedbaff" CreationDate="2010-09-30T15:21:44.633" UserId="4377" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="3062" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1515" RevisionGUID="e8b18049-8dec-44b7-ae5c-71ea38a0d398" CreationDate="2010-09-30T16:31:44.163" UserId="4377" Comment="added 7 characters in body" Text="It's unbelievable that Super User is still being used as a dumping ground especially for questions not on-topic on Stack Overflow.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Latest example:&#xD;&#xA; http://superuser.com/questions/194442/recommended-spam-best-practices&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;**Recommended Spam Best Practices**&#xD;&#xA;	&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Are there any recommended admin tools or interfaces for reviewing and moderating spam on a community-driven UGC site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't see what's the point in bringing them over to here and then closing it and have it cleaned by the mods/10k users. Why not just close it as off-topic in Stack Overflow itself ?" />
  <row Id="3063" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1516" RevisionGUID="957e954e-5963-49be-8215-446ae437006b" CreationDate="2010-09-30T20:19:51.830" UserId="289" Text="It's because the users with close rights on the other sites haven't read the FAQ recently.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps a link to the target site's FAQ should be included on the close dialog." />
  <row Id="3064" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1517" RevisionGUID="d49254e3-f030-4bd8-831e-75ff1a644fea" CreationDate="2010-09-30T20:24:10.197" UserId="289" Text="Now that [Nothing To Install](http://nothingtoinstall.com/) (Web App as was) is live, the Super User FAQ should be updated to read:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If your question is about …&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * **Programming**, ask on [Stack Overflow](http://stackoverflow.com/).&#xD;&#xA;* **Servers**, ask on [Server Fault](http://serverfault.com/).&#xD;&#xA;* **Web design and HTML/CSS layout**, and your job title is &quot;designer&quot;, ask on [Doctype](http://doctype.com/).&#xD;&#xA;* **Web Applications** ask on [Nothing To Install](http://nothingtoinstall.com/)" />
  <row Id="3065" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1517" RevisionGUID="d49254e3-f030-4bd8-831e-75ff1a644fea" CreationDate="2010-09-30T20:24:10.197" UserId="289" Text="Update Super User FAQ with a link to Nothing To Install." />
  <row Id="3066" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1517" RevisionGUID="d49254e3-f030-4bd8-831e-75ff1a644fea" CreationDate="2010-09-30T20:24:10.197" UserId="289" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;faq-update-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="3067" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1518" RevisionGUID="c60e91dc-d8af-4a87-9d44-623a5a94d948" CreationDate="2010-09-30T20:27:05.693" UserId="289" Text="The title says it all really.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now that [Nothing To Install](http://nothingtoinstall.com/) is live, will it be added to the close dialog?" />
  <row Id="3068" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1518" RevisionGUID="c60e91dc-d8af-4a87-9d44-623a5a94d948" CreationDate="2010-09-30T20:27:05.693" UserId="289" Text="Will an option to migrate to Nothing To Install be added to Super User's Close dialog?" />
  <row Id="3069" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1518" RevisionGUID="c60e91dc-d8af-4a87-9d44-623a5a94d948" CreationDate="2010-09-30T20:27:05.693" UserId="289" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;close-reasons&gt;" />
  <row Id="3070" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1519" RevisionGUID="32d97c11-9cc0-4df8-9019-816713b59419" CreationDate="2010-10-01T01:39:10.150" UserId="820" Text="Now, don't get me wrong, I get annoyed by this to, but in the end, we cannot expect users who are not regulars on Super User to know exactly which questions fit SU and which are off-topic.  Granted, they should have a basic idea,  but I can see how a spam related question might get mistaken and sent here, especially since it only takes 5 of the ~3500 3K users on Stack Overflow to send a question our way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can foresee this problem growing even larger as the Stack Exchange network continues to grow.  It is something that we as 3K+ users will have to keep an eye out for and just close the questions as the come in.  There really shouldn't be a distinction between migrated and new questions.  If they're off-topic, they need to be closed." />
  <row Id="3071" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="938" RevisionGUID="a83ce5cd-3085-4776-a90c-078ed29d326e" CreationDate="2010-10-01T12:15:52.663" UserId="517" Comment="added 5 characters in body" Text="&lt;sub&gt;I know I [promised to open this][1] a long time ago...&lt;/sub&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Super User has settled into some ad-hoc, but well-established, conventions for tagging questions about operating systems and their various versions.  This post is to discuss the current conventions used for Ubuntu, and see if any change needs to be made.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Currently, Ubuntu tags use the version number, instead of the release codename.  Codename tags occasionally get recreated and are usually replaced by hand, or occasionally get batch-retagged.  Here's a survey of Ubuntu-related tags in use:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Ubuntu**: [canonical]&#xD;&#xA;   - [ubuntu], [kubuntu], [xubuntu]&#xD;&#xA;   - [ubuntu-8.04-lts], [ubuntu-8.10], [ubuntu-9.04], [ubuntu-9.10], [ubuntu-10.04-lts]&#xD;&#xA;   - [ubuntu-server]&#xD;&#xA;   - [ubuntu-netbook-remix]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some people seem to prefer the codename tags, so here are the alternate conventions for version-specific tags I can think of.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Version number** &lt;sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;(current convention)&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/sub&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;   - [ubuntu-8.04-lts], [ubuntu-8.10], [ubuntu-9.04], [ubuntu-9.10], [ubuntu-10.04-lts]&#xD;&#xA; - **Short codename** &lt;sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;(occasionally get recreated)&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/sub&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;   - [hardy], [intrepid], [jaunty], [karmic], [lucid]&#xD;&#xA; - **Full codename**:&#xD;&#xA;   - [hardy-heron], [intrepid-ibex], [jaunty-jackalope], [karmic-koala], [lucid-lynx]&#xD;&#xA; - **Short codename, Ubuntu prefix** &lt;sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;(a la Debian)&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/sub&gt;:&#xD;&#xA;   - [ubuntu-hardy], [ubuntu-intrepid], [ubuntu-jaunty], [ubuntu-karmic], [ubuntu-lucid]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My aim is consistency, so that SU doesn't end up with 47 different tags that all mean *&quot;Ubuntu 9.10&quot;*.  I like the current convention, but I don't care which convention is followed.  If the community wants to settle on another convention, batch-retagging the existing questions won't be difficult, and I'll help keep it consistent.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For comparison, here's how tags for Windows, Mac OS X and Debian are currently handled:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Microsoft**: [microsoft]&#xD;&#xA;   - [windows]&#xD;&#xA;   - [windows-xp], [windows-vista], [windows-7], ...&#xD;&#xA;   - [windows-server], [windows-server-2003], [windows-server-2008]&#xD;&#xA;   - [windows-xp-embedded]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;` `&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Apple**: [apple], [mac]&#xD;&#xA;   - [osx], [mac-os]&#xD;&#xA;   - [jaguar], [tiger], [leopard], [snow-leopard]  &#xD;&#xA;   - [osx-server]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;` `&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - **Debian**:&#xD;&#xA;   - [debian]&#xD;&#xA;   - [debian-lenny], [debian-squeeze]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42283/su-retag-request-hdd-bluescreen-karmic-torrent/42512#42512&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3072" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1520" RevisionGUID="f351b23f-0e12-4084-91c4-7865e8edcd46" CreationDate="2010-10-01T13:22:12.607" UserId="289" Text="This has now been added." />
  <row Id="3073" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1517" RevisionGUID="59600329-4ab8-42ee-b29e-9f6463463764" CreationDate="2010-10-01T13:23:12.137" UserId="289" Comment="now with added link" Text="Now that [Nothing To Install](http://nothingtoinstall.com/) (Web App as was) is live, the Super User [FAQ](http://superuser.com/faq) should be updated to read:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If your question is about …&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * **Programming**, ask on [Stack Overflow](http://stackoverflow.com/).&#xD;&#xA;* **Servers**, ask on [Server Fault](http://serverfault.com/).&#xD;&#xA;* **Web design and HTML/CSS layout**, and your job title is &quot;designer&quot;, ask on [Doctype](http://doctype.com/).&#xD;&#xA;* **Web Applications** ask on [Nothing To Install](http://nothingtoinstall.com/)" />
  <row Id="3074" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1518" RevisionGUID="3f55a395-e084-40ef-b75f-4683f17fcfeb" CreationDate="2010-10-01T15:21:57.330" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;close-reasons&gt;" />
  <row Id="3075" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1514" RevisionGUID="510cb8c3-7f77-4a4e-b33f-a1b0c4e55767" CreationDate="2010-10-01T17:32:08.927" UserId="36601" Comment="added 169 characters in body" Text="In my answer [here][1], I was explaining about [Internationalized country code top-level domains][2]. Unfortunately, standard links for some reason do not allow users to click on such links.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; Such addresses are valid, so I believe that this is a bug which needs to be fixed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Link to question on SO meta [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/66353/).&#xD;&#xA;Related SO meta question [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/41644/).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/193931/how-do-people-type-different-languages-into-computer/193959#193959&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_country_code_top-level_domain&#xD;&#xA;  " />
  <row Id="3076" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1521" RevisionGUID="7ba6bdf3-97e5-4afc-8145-148c7acda237" CreationDate="2010-10-01T18:59:39.560" UserId="2013" Text="I noticed that `command-line` had no tag-wiki. So I thought I might try to add one. Unfortunately I wasn't among the top 20 answerers in that tag so I couldn't do it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I then thought about the `bash` tag(*). I think I could add the command-line tag to most (if not all) of the questions there without being wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But the command-line tag also deals with the windows command line and there is no way to know the difference without the help of other tags.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So we have a tag that can't stand on it's own.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Should we split it** to `command-line-win` and `command-line-nix` (Feel free to come up with better names)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or should I just add the `command-line` tag to bash and other shell questions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;sup&gt;**(*)**&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;where I can edit the tag-wiki&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3077" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1521" RevisionGUID="7ba6bdf3-97e5-4afc-8145-148c7acda237" CreationDate="2010-10-01T18:59:39.560" UserId="2013" Text="Is command-line a meta tag?" />
  <row Id="3078" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1521" RevisionGUID="7ba6bdf3-97e5-4afc-8145-148c7acda237" CreationDate="2010-10-01T18:59:39.560" UserId="2013" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;retagging&gt;" />
  <row Id="3079" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1522" RevisionGUID="0df13458-a88c-4db2-9d2a-365844509d4e" CreationDate="2010-10-01T19:55:15.093" UserId="4377" Text="&gt; Should we split it to command-line-win and command-line-nix `&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Not really, IMO `[command-line]` should be left as it is. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Or should I just add the command-line tag to bash and other shell questions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;That seems reasonable&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3084" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1524" RevisionGUID="33df2bac-550f-42ba-8e17-206f35a887e6" CreationDate="2010-10-02T22:53:15.963" UserId="2013" Text="A new question about [computer building][1] was recently closed with the &quot;Off Topic&quot; reason. But the close text is a bit misleading:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;Questions on Super User are expected to generally relate to computer software or computer hardware in some way, within the scope defined in the faq.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This question is undoubtedly about computer hardware so any newcomers might wonder what's going on. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My suggestion is that:  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  1. Explain that questions about building a computer is not wanted and [why][2] in the faq&#xD;&#xA;  2. Add something about this in the `close as OT` text. (Not sure about this)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/195203/what-are-some-good-ways-to-convert-this-old-extended-ata-system-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://meta.superuser.com/questions/665/superuser-organization-for-new-computer-build-questions" />
  <row Id="3085" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1524" RevisionGUID="33df2bac-550f-42ba-8e17-206f35a887e6" CreationDate="2010-10-02T22:53:15.963" UserId="2013" Text="Computer build question" />
  <row Id="3086" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1524" RevisionGUID="33df2bac-550f-42ba-8e17-206f35a887e6" CreationDate="2010-10-02T22:53:15.963" UserId="2013" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;faq-update-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="3087" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1525" RevisionGUID="91053d1d-5d84-4cf6-9d71-758814b9c5f2" CreationDate="2010-10-03T01:15:25.193" UserId="307" Text="Forgot the note about it being akin to walking down the aisle trying to ask everybody around you which part is best for the new machine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; This is the same as asking for shopping advice, which is off-topic&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's that &quot;generally relate to&quot; part which makes many users with closed questions scratch. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Of course it's all related. But it's not on-topic or on-focus for the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Really should be changed to be more explicit along the lines of:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; Questions on Super User are expected to help you find fixes to computer software or computer hardware in some way, within the scope defined in the faq.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3088" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1526" RevisionGUID="2faf1f31-00d5-43a4-b85e-b0310ad869c5" CreationDate="2010-10-03T04:27:38.587" UserId="11402" Text="This question deals with a basic aspect of human behaviour, in my opinion [best described by Douglas Adams][1].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question is pretty much answered by ChrisF and heavyd already;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; 1. SO users come across a question they don't quite know what to do with&#xD;&#xA; 2. It's not a SO question, but it's not stupid either&#xD;&#xA; 3. It's not about networking or servers&#xD;&#xA; 4. Then it probably belongs on SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The bigger the community (or corporation) gets, the easier it gets to pass along a problem rather than deal with it yourself, because you're not in direct contact with the recipients of the problem. And if you have to read a lot of different faq's before you choose whom to pass the problem to, it gets worse.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We like to deal with problems as quickly as possible, and unimportant problems even quicker. So, bottom line, it should somehow be made *almost as easy* to pass a question that's irrelevant to one stack exchange site *correctly* on to another as it is to pass it randomly. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe the faq's for the site in question should show up each time a user tries to pass along a question? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somebody_Else%27s_Problem" />
  <row Id="3092" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1528" RevisionGUID="2b6d5ade-49bc-422b-afdf-b322fff7bf0f" CreationDate="2010-10-03T13:57:46.093" UserId="2013" Text="My tag crusade continues&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next tag I want to banish becaus I think it is a [meta-tag][1] is `old` &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a good idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/" />
  <row Id="3093" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1528" RevisionGUID="2b6d5ade-49bc-422b-afdf-b322fff7bf0f" CreationDate="2010-10-03T13:57:46.093" UserId="2013" Text="Should we bury the old tag?" />
  <row Id="3094" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1528" RevisionGUID="2b6d5ade-49bc-422b-afdf-b322fff7bf0f" CreationDate="2010-10-03T13:57:46.093" UserId="2013" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="3095" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1529" RevisionGUID="dc8ab0fd-9da7-450f-8a34-72e345f50904" CreationDate="2010-10-03T15:10:30.637" UserId="4377" Text="I'd say yes. At first glance, I have no clue what a question tagged as `[old]` means, and as such  it's a useless tag to have." />
  <row Id="3096" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1528" RevisionGUID="48cda138-3d84-4bde-8334-a55aa187b4ba" CreationDate="2010-10-03T15:11:48.687" UserId="4377" Comment="added 43 characters in body" Text="My tag crusade continues&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The next tag I want to banish becaus I think it is a [meta-tag][1] is [`old` ][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this a good idea?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/tags/old" />
  <row Id="3097" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1530" RevisionGUID="085569be-b841-4742-867a-c066ffe753f8" CreationDate="2010-10-03T16:32:57.293" UserId="2013" Text="I have found synonyms to all these tags, please vote up or down if you are eligible on to do so (2000 rep), 4 votes creates the association -2 votes kills it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/bittorrent/synonyms&quot;&gt;bittorrent&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/colors/synonyms&quot;&gt;colors&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/shell-script/synonyms&quot;&gt;shell-script&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/virtual-machine/synonyms&quot;&gt;virtual-machine&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/networking/synonyms&quot;&gt;networking&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/wireless-networking/synonyms&quot;&gt;wireless-networking&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/operating-systems/synonyms&quot;&gt;operating-systems&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/mac/synonyms&quot;&gt;mac&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/memory/synonyms&quot;&gt;memory&lt;/a&gt; (not sure about this)  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/microsoft-access/synonyms&quot;&gt;microsoft-access&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/hard-drive/synonyms&quot;&gt;hard-drive&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/applications/synonyms&quot;&gt;applications&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/graphics-card/synonyms&quot;&gt;graphics-card&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/freeze/synonyms&quot;&gt;freeze&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3098" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1530" RevisionGUID="085569be-b841-4742-867a-c066ffe753f8" CreationDate="2010-10-03T16:32:57.293" UserId="2013" Text="Call to vote: Synonyms" />
  <row Id="3099" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1530" RevisionGUID="085569be-b841-4742-867a-c066ffe753f8" CreationDate="2010-10-03T16:32:57.293" UserId="2013" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tag-synonyms&gt;" />
  <row Id="3100" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1530" RevisionGUID="085569be-b841-4742-867a-c066ffe753f8" CreationDate="2010-10-03T16:32:57.293" UserId="2013" />
  <row Id="3103" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1517" RevisionGUID="f664b601-ae01-4dfb-979b-d09e1bc4308e" CreationDate="2010-10-03T18:54:58.977" UserId="4377" Comment="Shit happened." Text="Now that &lt;s&gt;Web Apps&lt;/s&gt; &lt;s&gt;Nothing To Install&lt;/s&gt; [Web Apps][1] is live, the Super User [FAQ](http://superuser.com/faq) should be updated to read:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If your question is about …&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * **Programming**, ask on [Stack Overflow](http://stackoverflow.com/).&#xD;&#xA;* **Servers**, ask on [Server Fault](http://serverfault.com/).&#xD;&#xA;* **Web design and HTML/CSS layout**, and your job title is &quot;designer&quot;, ask on [Doctype](http://doctype.com/).&#xD;&#xA;* **Web Applications** ask on [Web Apps](http://webapps.stackexchange.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webapps.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="3104" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1517" RevisionGUID="f664b601-ae01-4dfb-979b-d09e1bc4308e" CreationDate="2010-10-03T18:54:58.977" UserId="4377" Comment="Shit happened." Text="Update Super User FAQ with a link to WebApps" />
  <row Id="3105" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1518" RevisionGUID="b4532ee9-7461-4b14-acca-ac563b36c4f7" CreationDate="2010-10-03T18:57:41.747" UserId="4377" Comment="Shit happened." Text="The title says it all really.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Now that &lt;s&gt;Nothing To Install&lt;/s&gt; [WebApps](http://webapps.stackexchange.com/) is live, will it be added to the close dialog?" />
  <row Id="3106" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1518" RevisionGUID="b4532ee9-7461-4b14-acca-ac563b36c4f7" CreationDate="2010-10-03T18:57:41.747" UserId="4377" Comment="Shit happened." Text="Will an option to migrate to Web Apps be added to Super User's Close dialog?" />
  <row Id="3107" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1531" RevisionGUID="3befbc67-3b4c-4877-9dc8-fcfa65b6f542" CreationDate="2010-10-04T04:27:51.737" UserId="16455" Text="Looks to me like he's somewhat abusive of his powers.  " />
  <row Id="3108" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1531" RevisionGUID="3befbc67-3b4c-4877-9dc8-fcfa65b6f542" CreationDate="2010-10-04T04:27:51.737" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3109" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1530" RevisionGUID="93144c39-1dc3-4d72-bc07-b49f70608c99" CreationDate="2010-10-04T12:20:50.783" UserId="2013" Comment="added 11 characters in body" Text="I have found synonyms to all these tags, please vote up or down if you are eligible on to do so (2000 rep), 4 votes creates the association -2 votes kills it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/bittorrent/synonyms&quot;&gt;bittorrent&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/colors/synonyms&quot;&gt;colors&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/shell-script/synonyms&quot;&gt;shell-script&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/virtual-machine/synonyms&quot;&gt;virtual-machine&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/networking/synonyms&quot;&gt;networking&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/wireless-networking/synonyms&quot;&gt;wireless-networking&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/operating-systems/synonyms&quot;&gt;operating-systems&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/mac/synonyms&quot;&gt;mac&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/memory/synonyms&quot;&gt;memory&lt;/a&gt; (not sure about this)  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/microsoft-access/synonyms&quot;&gt;microsoft-access&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/hard-drive/synonyms&quot;&gt;hard-drive&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/applications/synonyms&quot;&gt;applications&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/graphics-card/synonyms&quot;&gt;graphics-card&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/freeze/synonyms&quot;&gt;freeze&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;!- bump -&gt;" />
  <row Id="3110" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1532" RevisionGUID="2076b1e4-2c61-4f3c-9923-4b6072e43730" CreationDate="2010-10-04T11:22:52.907" UserDisplayName="benjisail" Text="Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question is in the title. I don't understand why we have to make our reputation separately in stackoverflow, serverfault and superuser even if the accounts are linked?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Benjamin" />
  <row Id="3111" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1532" RevisionGUID="2076b1e4-2c61-4f3c-9923-4b6072e43730" CreationDate="2010-10-04T11:22:52.907" UserDisplayName="benjisail" Text="Why reputation is not passed between superuser, stackoverflow and serverfault?" />
  <row Id="3112" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1532" RevisionGUID="2076b1e4-2c61-4f3c-9923-4b6072e43730" CreationDate="2010-10-04T11:22:52.907" UserDisplayName="benjisail" Text="&lt;stackoverflow&gt;&lt;stack-exchange&gt;" />
  <row Id="3113" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1532" RevisionGUID="6053c785-3baf-4e6b-8a5b-84f7773f0f71" CreationDate="2010-10-04T12:53:54.870" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/195609/why-reputation-is-not-passed-between-superuser-stackoverflow-and-serverfault" Text="" />
  <row Id="3114" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1530" RevisionGUID="edf455d6-7570-43f4-92df-6884b75c88a1" CreationDate="2010-10-04T12:55:54.647" UserId="2013" Comment="added 119 characters in body; added 17 characters in body" Text="I have found synonyms to all these tags, please vote up or down if you are eligible on to do so (2000 rep), 4 votes creates the association -2 votes kills it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/bittorrent/synonyms&quot;&gt;bittorrent&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/colors/synonyms&quot;&gt;colors&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/shell-script/synonyms&quot;&gt;shell-script&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/virtual-machine/synonyms&quot;&gt;virtual-machine&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/networking/synonyms&quot;&gt;networking&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/wireless-networking/synonyms&quot;&gt;wireless-networking&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/operating-systems/synonyms&quot;&gt;operating-systems&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/mac/synonyms&quot;&gt;mac&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/memory/synonyms&quot;&gt;memory&lt;/a&gt; (not sure about this)  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/microsoft-access/synonyms&quot;&gt;microsoft-access&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/hard-drive/synonyms&quot;&gt;hard-drive&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/applications/synonyms&quot;&gt;applications&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/graphics-card/synonyms&quot;&gt;graphics-card&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/freeze/synonyms&quot;&gt;freeze&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Or go to the [full list of synonyms][1] and see all synonyms to vote on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/tags/synonyms?filter=suggested&amp;tab=newest" />
  <row Id="3115" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1533" RevisionGUID="ceee0dfb-650b-45c5-b430-3afabfe38a02" CreationDate="2010-10-04T13:22:48.110" UserId="34844" Text="Imagine this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You're a professional baseball player and are considered the very best in the world, now would that also automatically make you a good chess player, a proper teacher or a physicist?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The same goes for the SE quartet, your expertise on one of the four subjects doesn't necessarily make you an expert on the other three subjects. Therefore, reputation or &quot;trust by the community&quot; on each subject should be earned separately.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Even though it's not always just, deep down inside you will probably trust a 10k rep user over a 1 rep user.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Imagine this (unreal) example: an incredible programmer from Stack Overflow who knows nothing about viruses recommends to never install virus protection because it will slow down his development kit... He has 50k rep on SO and therefore will also have 50k on SU... would you want a 50k rep user to give answers like that on SU?" />
  <row Id="3116" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1532" RevisionGUID="13dd103c-1862-44e3-932d-9046d52c044a" CreationDate="2010-10-04T13:41:11.917" UserId="34844" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;&lt;stackoverflow&gt;&lt;stack-exchange&gt;" />
  <row Id="3117" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1530" RevisionGUID="a8a25a76-8933-4e37-aaa9-31e432161865" CreationDate="2010-10-04T13:52:15.510" UserId="4377" Comment="added 107 characters in body" Text="I have found synonyms to all these tags, please vote up or down if you are eligible on to do so (2000 rep), 4 votes creates the association -2 votes kills it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/bittorrent/synonyms&quot;&gt;bittorrent&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/colors/synonyms&quot;&gt;colors&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/shell-script/synonyms&quot;&gt;shell-script&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/virtual-machine/synonyms&quot;&gt;virtual-machine&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/networking/synonyms&quot;&gt;networking&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/wireless-networking/synonyms&quot;&gt;wireless-networking&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/operating-systems/synonyms&quot;&gt;operating-systems&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/mac/synonyms&quot;&gt;mac&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/memory/synonyms&quot;&gt;memory&lt;/a&gt; (not sure about this)  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/microsoft-access/synonyms&quot;&gt;microsoft-access&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/hard-drive/synonyms&quot;&gt;hard-drive&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/applications/synonyms&quot;&gt;applications&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/graphics-card/synonyms&quot;&gt;graphics-card&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superuser.com/tags/freeze/synonyms&quot;&gt;freeze&lt;/a&gt;  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;[defragmentation][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;------&#xD;&#xA;Or go to the [full list of synonyms][2] and see all synonyms to vote on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/tags/defragmentation/synonyms&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/tags/synonyms?filter=suggested&amp;tab=newest" />
  <row Id="3118" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1534" RevisionGUID="e1bfadcf-0764-41cb-b535-166df747a301" CreationDate="2010-10-04T15:03:05.610" UserId="3981" Text="I have merged most of these. The one's that aren't merged and approved are one's with negative votes and I would prefer the community to confirm. Most of the others had enough votes to justify merging." />
  <row Id="3119" PostHistoryTypeId="16" PostId="1534" RevisionGUID="e1bfadcf-0764-41cb-b535-166df747a301" CreationDate="2010-10-04T15:03:05.610" UserId="-1" />
  <row Id="3120" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1530" RevisionGUID="1fc51315-8194-48d4-92e3-3ced17ef756f" CreationDate="2010-10-04T15:03:19.010" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;tag-synonyms&gt;" />
  <row Id="3121" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1535" RevisionGUID="fd25812e-7868-4bce-9cd1-b6a6603da390" CreationDate="2010-10-04T18:22:31.243" UserId="266" Text="I suggest that marking a question as favorite should give at least as much reputation to the writer than upvoting the question...  After all, if the user intends to come back to the question later, it must be that this question is interesting, no?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Comments?" />
  <row Id="3122" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1535" RevisionGUID="fd25812e-7868-4bce-9cd1-b6a6603da390" CreationDate="2010-10-04T18:22:31.243" UserId="266" Text="Shouldn't 'mark favorite' give the same reputation as an up vote? Or even more?" />
  <row Id="3123" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1535" RevisionGUID="fd25812e-7868-4bce-9cd1-b6a6603da390" CreationDate="2010-10-04T18:22:31.243" UserId="266" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;&lt;favorites&gt;&lt;vote&gt;" />
  <row Id="3124" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1536" RevisionGUID="4d1927ff-30c5-4b77-a17e-72700a42f2cf" CreationDate="2010-10-04T18:34:38.470" UserId="3981" Text="**No**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I use favourites as bookmarks for questions I still want to answer, and once I have done so I remove the favourite flagged. The purpose of favourites is not to gain reputation, and I can't see doing so adding any value except opening up a massive avenue of abuse." />
  <row Id="3125" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1532" RevisionGUID="e3b0d879-5a00-4058-bd05-fef2946a8a17" CreationDate="2010-10-04T21:01:22.320" UserId="34844" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;&lt;stack-exchange&gt;" />
  <row Id="3126" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1537" RevisionGUID="18ccd4c2-635e-4797-b0d8-cef515dfe426" CreationDate="2010-10-05T02:38:54.623" UserId="5501" Text="I can't see [webapps][1] link in super user screen bottom section.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Same link is present SO, API/Apps. Even serverfault doesn't have this link?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure about bug tag, still i'm making this question tag as bug.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Please retag if required.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webapps.stackexchange.com/" />
  <row Id="3127" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1537" RevisionGUID="18ccd4c2-635e-4797-b0d8-cef515dfe426" CreationDate="2010-10-05T02:38:54.623" UserId="5501" Text="Webapps link missing in SU" />
  <row Id="3128" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1537" RevisionGUID="18ccd4c2-635e-4797-b0d8-cef515dfe426" CreationDate="2010-10-05T02:38:54.623" UserId="5501" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;hyperlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="3129" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1538" RevisionGUID="a7db9c97-b5ca-4e60-991f-b5e639c9b044" CreationDate="2010-10-05T04:12:03.303" UserId="4377" Text="I'd have thought since Webapps is not part of the &quot;Trilogy&quot;, the links are not available. SO &amp; SU are on the same SVN revision, so I'm not exactly sure why Webapps link is not available.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3130" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1539" RevisionGUID="c0e7b6f8-8789-4412-ae11-572cd382478f" CreationDate="2010-10-05T07:46:22.843" UserId="24760" Text="When I log in into another stack exchange website, I got 100 reputation bonus. I join superuser since the website started, and that time, there is no reputation bonus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My question, will I be able to get reputation bonus in here, or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;PS: My reason to get reputation bonus is to vote up the answers that really helpful that I found in this site. Most of my needs already asked and answered, so I'm stuck with 1 reputation, cannot vote up, even cannot ask question in meta.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thanks." />
  <row Id="3131" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1539" RevisionGUID="c0e7b6f8-8789-4412-ae11-572cd382478f" CreationDate="2010-10-05T07:46:22.843" UserId="24760" Text="Reputation bonus (please move this to meta because I cannot ask question in meta)" />
  <row Id="3132" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1539" RevisionGUID="c0e7b6f8-8789-4412-ae11-572cd382478f" CreationDate="2010-10-05T07:46:22.843" UserId="24760" Text="&lt;meta&gt;" />
  <row Id="3134" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1540" RevisionGUID="e107c6b0-f04d-4391-8f42-de73edcaf0dc" CreationDate="2010-10-05T07:56:45.573" UserId="3981" Text="You get the reputation bonus when you have more then 200 reputation on one of the SO sites. Since you created your SU account before you had 200 rep on SO, you never initially got the bonus.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, if you un-associate and re-associate your accounts in the accounts tab under you profile, it should pick up your SO reputation and give you the bonus this time round." />
  <row Id="3135" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1539" RevisionGUID="924180ff-13f5-4d24-a8d3-18404dcf6a3a" CreationDate="2010-10-05T07:57:08.087" UserId="3981" Comment="edited title" Text="Reputation Bonus" />
  <row Id="3136" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1539" RevisionGUID="12bb9738-98e6-4dda-ace1-e5181dc68f08" CreationDate="2010-10-05T12:31:25.170" UserId="4377" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;association&gt;&lt;user-accounts&gt;" />
  <row Id="3137" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1541" RevisionGUID="9291c95c-eaf9-4605-adbc-aa9ff1660007" CreationDate="2010-10-06T10:39:21.073" UserId="39366" Text="This is obviously now fixed. Accepting to make sure the question fades away..." />
  <row Id="3138" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1542" RevisionGUID="29c71db6-d1c8-4acc-819a-78e91848a568" CreationDate="2010-10-06T15:43:49.787" UserId="39366" Text="[This][1] question brought to my attention the [`[crapware]`][2] tag, in this context being used to refer to IE9.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In fact there are 6 tagged questions this way, so it's hardly a widespread issue, but it's better to bring these things up sooner than later, right? Anyway, in the other cases it seems to be used to refer to pre-installed software, which I think is the &quot;correct&quot; usage of the term.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I personally think the term &quot;crapware&quot; is itself a little argumentative/subjective, especially if people start using it to refer to IE, for example.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Basically, I'm calling a close vote on a tag; what does everyone else think?  &#xD;&#xA;Kill the tag? Replace the tag? Update just this question? Do nothing?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://superuser.com/questions/196558/uninstalling-ie9&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/crapware" />
  <row Id="3139" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1542" RevisionGUID="29c71db6-d1c8-4acc-819a-78e91848a568" CreationDate="2010-10-06T15:43:49.787" UserId="39366" Text="Do we need the [crapware] tag?" />
  <row Id="3140" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1542" RevisionGUID="29c71db6-d1c8-4acc-819a-78e91848a568" CreationDate="2010-10-06T15:43:49.787" UserId="39366" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="3141" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1543" RevisionGUID="d7afbe00-f06a-46bf-bed3-4f446a88f6b4" CreationDate="2010-10-06T19:47:04.173" UserId="289" Text="I've vote to kill the tag - but I think we might need to come up with a tag that describes the stuff that gets loaded onto PCs (particularly laptops) by the big manufacturers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We could then make `[crapware]` a synonym for that so it won't get created again." />
  <row Id="3142" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1544" RevisionGUID="f69c0dfc-3356-4c6c-acf6-5796c577ded6" CreationDate="2010-10-06T19:48:28.177" UserId="2013" Text="I say leave it, it seems to low volume to be a problem.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I created it's wiki so hopefully it easier to see it's proper use." />
  <row Id="3143" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1545" RevisionGUID="a2b1ec9e-a1f3-4863-8f78-0abdb9df3334" CreationDate="2010-10-06T23:39:06.477" UserId="3981" Text="After some searching I have merged it with bloatware. I have also made bloat a synonym to bloatware to make it simpler in future." />
  <row Id="3144" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1546" RevisionGUID="5c0c1179-7915-4f63-b569-4174bb787ba1" CreationDate="2010-10-07T11:30:10.257" UserId="289" Text="SO now has Web Apps and Gaming links, but SU (which would be the largest source of questions from the original trilogy sites) doesn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Server Fault doesn't either." />
  <row Id="3145" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1517" RevisionGUID="2bfcc488-4bf8-4043-a126-a8f07b5fc24c" CreationDate="2010-10-07T11:32:23.153" UserId="289" Comment="more info" Text="Now that &lt;s&gt;Web Apps&lt;/s&gt; &lt;s&gt;Nothing To Install&lt;/s&gt; [Web Apps][1] and [Gaming][2] are live, the Super User [FAQ](http://superuser.com/faq) should be updated to read:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; If your question is about …&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; * **Programming**, ask on [Stack Overflow](http://stackoverflow.com/).&#xD;&#xA;* **Servers**, ask on [Server Fault](http://serverfault.com/).&#xD;&#xA;* **Web design and HTML/CSS layout**, and your job title is &quot;designer&quot;, ask on [Doctype](http://doctype.com/).&#xD;&#xA;* **Web Applications** ask on [Web Apps](http://webapps.stackexchange.com/)&#xD;&#xA;* **Games and Consoles** ask on [Gaming](http://gaming.stackexchange.com/)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://webapps.stackexchange.com&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://gaming.stackexchange.com" />
  <row Id="3146" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1517" RevisionGUID="2bfcc488-4bf8-4043-a126-a8f07b5fc24c" CreationDate="2010-10-07T11:32:23.153" UserId="289" Comment="more info" Text="Update Super User FAQ with a link to WebApps and Gaming" />
  <row Id="3147" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1547" RevisionGUID="4f8430d9-6552-4fe4-9d92-96a23dbd78b3" CreationDate="2010-10-07T11:34:24.007" UserId="289" Text="The same request as [this question][1] but for the gaming site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1518/will-an-option-to-migrate-to-web-apps-be-added-to-super-users-close-dialog" />
  <row Id="3148" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1547" RevisionGUID="4f8430d9-6552-4fe4-9d92-96a23dbd78b3" CreationDate="2010-10-07T11:34:24.007" UserId="289" Text="Will an option to migrate to gaming be added to Super User's close dialog?" />
  <row Id="3149" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1547" RevisionGUID="4f8430d9-6552-4fe4-9d92-96a23dbd78b3" CreationDate="2010-10-07T11:34:24.007" UserId="289" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="3150" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1546" RevisionGUID="1eae3197-9294-4248-981e-bd1d1d8bd8cb" CreationDate="2010-10-07T11:39:15.027" UserId="289" Comment="more info" Text="SO now has Web Apps and Gaming links, but SU (which would be the largest source of questions from the original trilogy sites) doesn't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The new sites have the &quot;full&quot; footer with all the non-beta sites listed.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Server Fault hasn't been updated either." />
  <row Id="3151" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1548" RevisionGUID="72c66f01-9a44-4a75-ae88-13ed304c5afe" CreationDate="2010-10-07T12:30:57.043" UserId="46542" Text="Let the pictures do the talking&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;Not necessarily a bug, but could be fixed nevertheless.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/3w8K7.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/a6nUv.jpg" />
  <row Id="3152" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1548" RevisionGUID="72c66f01-9a44-4a75-ae88-13ed304c5afe" CreationDate="2010-10-07T12:30:57.043" UserId="46542" Text="You can select an answer prompt shown before you really can" />
  <row Id="3153" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1548" RevisionGUID="72c66f01-9a44-4a75-ae88-13ed304c5afe" CreationDate="2010-10-07T12:30:57.043" UserId="46542" Text="&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="3154" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1537" RevisionGUID="e9f9658a-d1a3-4781-831e-ad97da25605d" CreationDate="2010-10-07T13:33:26.113" UserId="2" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;hyperlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="3155" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1549" RevisionGUID="0637998a-7b49-4567-8d3d-60d66078d966" CreationDate="2010-10-07T19:26:12.500" UserId="2013" Text="Probably not until it's out of beta" />
  <row Id="3156" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1543" RevisionGUID="1d4d2f85-02ac-422d-920e-d5702e685396" CreationDate="2010-10-07T20:42:25.497" UserId="289" Comment="fixed grammar" Text="I'd vote to kill the tag - but I think we might need to come up with a tag that describes the stuff that gets loaded onto PCs (particularly laptops) by the big manufacturers.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We could then make `[crapware]` a synonym for that so it won't get created again." />
  <row Id="3157" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1550" RevisionGUID="12396983-4a4a-44a0-af65-ddac3c48903e" CreationDate="2010-10-08T02:14:59.193" UserId="11546" Text="Will Meta Superuser consider adding a &quot;# of views&quot; sort function to the Superuser main page?" />
  <row Id="3158" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1550" RevisionGUID="12396983-4a4a-44a0-af65-ddac3c48903e" CreationDate="2010-10-08T02:14:59.193" UserId="11546" Text="Will Meta Superuser consider adding a &quot;# of views&quot; sort function to the Superuser main page?" />
  <row Id="3159" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1550" RevisionGUID="12396983-4a4a-44a0-af65-ddac3c48903e" CreationDate="2010-10-08T02:14:59.193" UserId="11546" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;superusr&gt;" />
  <row Id="3160" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1551" RevisionGUID="a8b52e53-0ab6-4552-a53b-e21ad1cab7fa" CreationDate="2010-10-08T03:08:54.093" UserId="5501" Text="Since yesterday i.e October 8th, 2010, I unable to see meta site link for SU and SF.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have meta community link in SF and SU but both points to SO meta Community.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I missing anything here?" />
  <row Id="3161" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1551" RevisionGUID="a8b52e53-0ab6-4552-a53b-e21ad1cab7fa" CreationDate="2010-10-08T03:08:54.093" UserId="5501" Text="SU Meta Communilty Link Missing" />
  <row Id="3162" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1551" RevisionGUID="a8b52e53-0ab6-4552-a53b-e21ad1cab7fa" CreationDate="2010-10-08T03:08:54.093" UserId="5501" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;bug&gt;&lt;hyperlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="3163" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1551" RevisionGUID="7dbf7276-307d-4901-8205-74a05571484f" CreationDate="2010-10-08T08:10:13.270" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;hyperlinks&gt;" />
  <row Id="3164" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1552" RevisionGUID="4684c479-e652-4f7b-bb4a-2c1d8b7a50a8" CreationDate="2010-10-08T08:11:52.523" UserId="3981" Text="I doubt it. This is currently only valid for Beta sites, and once they leave beta the stats are removed. The easiest way to see stats for a specific non beta site is to use [StackExchange](http://www.stackexchange.com)" />
  <row Id="3165" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1414" RevisionGUID="a9e1c1ce-32da-4213-93e2-0f62b39223cd" CreationDate="2010-10-08T08:15:23.210" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;firefox&gt;&lt;logout&gt;" />
  <row Id="3166" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1550" RevisionGUID="63e6b69f-4d61-4dd5-9f93-723787e99f7a" CreationDate="2010-10-08T08:17:03.787" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;statistics&gt;" />
  <row Id="3167" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1551" RevisionGUID="542e6df2-6efc-4775-8a9f-3a6a0c5422a5" CreationDate="2010-10-08T08:36:29.310" UserId="5501" Comment="added 87 characters in body; edited title" Text="Since yesterday i.e October 8th, 2010, I unable to see meta site link for SU and SF.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;We have meta community link in SF and SU but both points to SO meta Community.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I missing anything here?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Please see screen shot**&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/y7vyd.jpg" />
  <row Id="3168" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1551" RevisionGUID="542e6df2-6efc-4775-8a9f-3a6a0c5422a5" CreationDate="2010-10-08T08:36:29.310" UserId="5501" Comment="added 87 characters in body; edited title" Text="SU Meta Communilty Link pointing to SO Meta Community" />
  <row Id="3169" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1553" RevisionGUID="49978033-984f-414d-a287-e82f033f4216" CreationDate="2010-10-08T14:04:27.507" UserId="3981" Text="It seems like this was changed by the team, and to be honest makes sense since there is already a meta link to the SE meta in the top link list. I personally have found it irritating that there is no way to get to MSO from the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't seem to find any official confirmation of this anywhere on MSO itself, however I am not convinced it is a bug." />
  <row Id="3170" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1551" RevisionGUID="76e0b13e-00d3-4edb-bcb2-661ce23d8382" CreationDate="2010-10-08T16:42:36.870" UserId="34844" Comment="edited title" Text="SU Meta Community Link pointing to SO Meta Community" />
  <row Id="3171" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1554" RevisionGUID="0a935da7-eaca-4243-8328-944b4cab7b30" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:39:52.880" UserId="47225" Text="I've been looking though some of my questions and answers and realized that some of them are the highest quality that I want them to be at.  Is it bad protocol to go back and cleanup questions and answers to make them a higher quality?  For example a question with multiple edits/updates cleaned up to a single question, but with the same material.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Here is one of my questions](http://superuser.com/questions/184868/system-critical-error-kernel-power-and-crash) as a reference." />
  <row Id="3172" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1554" RevisionGUID="0a935da7-eaca-4243-8328-944b4cab7b30" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:39:52.880" UserId="47225" Text="Is it ok to go back and &quot;cleanup&quot; questions and answers that I've asked/answered?" />
  <row Id="3173" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1554" RevisionGUID="0a935da7-eaca-4243-8328-944b4cab7b30" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:39:52.880" UserId="47225" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;answers&gt;&lt;asking-questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="3174" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1555" RevisionGUID="ff9046eb-2784-4982-9f7f-d04912f17ac0" CreationDate="2010-10-11T16:53:46.477" UserId="4377" Text="&gt; Is it bad protocol to go back and cleanup questions and answers to make them a higher quality&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, that's actually a good thing." />
  <row Id="3175" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1556" RevisionGUID="bb7cf7b8-efc8-4f77-906b-0cac24dd3c97" CreationDate="2010-10-11T20:33:52.983" UserId="42315" Text="[This question](http://superuser.com/questions/198211/latex-beamer-how-to-get-distinct-page-numbers-when-using-overlays-closed) was closed as off-topic. Yet it fits squarely within the topic of Super User as defined by the FAQ (it's a question about the beamer plug-in for the TeX program, to put it into general terms).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It's true that asking on the [TeX site](http://tex.stackexchange.com/) is likely to elicit a better response, but how is a new user who may not even be aware of its existence (ok, not the case in the particular instance I cited above) supposed to guess that? Could we have&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* a policy for users to decide whether to flag or close such questions&#xD;&#xA;* a way for new users to know whether TeX questions are allowed/recommended/not-recommended/forbidden at Super User&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3176" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1556" RevisionGUID="bb7cf7b8-efc8-4f77-906b-0cac24dd3c97" CreationDate="2010-10-11T20:33:52.983" UserId="42315" Text="Are TeX/LaTeX questions off-topic?" />
  <row Id="3177" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1556" RevisionGUID="bb7cf7b8-efc8-4f77-906b-0cac24dd3c97" CreationDate="2010-10-11T20:33:52.983" UserId="42315" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;&lt;close-reasons&gt;" />
  <row Id="3178" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1557" RevisionGUID="8d91010e-4e9d-42ff-a007-2c3f2fabf59f" CreationDate="2010-10-11T21:21:45.460" UserId="48624" Text="I've seen a small handful of questions here marked as off topic that just baffle me.  Here is the latest:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/197939/best-host-for-vmware-workstation/197942&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;How is that remotely off topic?  Just to make sure, I went back and read the rules, and I see nothing in them that says questions about which OS is best for VM Ware could be off topic?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Folks, aren't we here to be helpful?  I love the organization of StackExchange sites, and I think that having very active mods helps keep that running.  Their work is generally excellent.  However, I think it is going too far in some cases, and I am really interested in knowing why this question in particular was flagged as off topic by two separate individuals." />
  <row Id="3179" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1557" RevisionGUID="8d91010e-4e9d-42ff-a007-2c3f2fabf59f" CreationDate="2010-10-11T21:21:45.460" UserId="48624" Text="Too liberal use of the &quot;off topic&quot; button" />
  <row Id="3180" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1557" RevisionGUID="8d91010e-4e9d-42ff-a007-2c3f2fabf59f" CreationDate="2010-10-11T21:21:45.460" UserId="48624" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;moderators&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;off-topic&gt;" />
  <row Id="3181" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1558" RevisionGUID="4cbf578d-8618-4918-84df-cda0ed5849c9" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:15:05.140" UserId="34844" Text="I agree... and if every question that is also on topic on an area51/other SE site would automatically be off topic on Superuser, we'd better close the whole damn site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All Ubuntu/Apple or Android syncing/Unix/Linux should then be closed as off topic on Superuser..." />
  <row Id="3182" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1559" RevisionGUID="50280564-8e27-495d-8917-49c47b2fb9e8" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:16:11.913" UserId="34844" Text="My bet is they thought it was asking for a shopping recommendation." />
  <row Id="3183" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1558" RevisionGUID="941ffee5-deb2-48d4-8598-99db8f48e9c2" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:20:22.337" UserId="34844" Comment="added 137 characters in body" Text="I agree... and if every question that is also on topic on an area51/other SE site would automatically be off topic on Superuser, we'd better close the whole damn site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All Ubuntu/Apple or Android syncing/Unix/Linux questions should then be closed as off topic on Superuser...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A quick count from the Superuser homepage reveals that at least 14 currently featured questions should be closed off topic." />
  <row Id="3184" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1558" RevisionGUID="ff1641a5-d90b-4634-99e6-a85f81dc1c22" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:25:33.087" UserId="34844" Comment="added 234 characters in body" Text="I agree... and if every question that is also on topic on an area51/other SE site would automatically be off topic on Superuser, we'd better close the whole damn site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;All Ubuntu/Apple or Android syncing/Unix/Linux questions should then be closed as off topic on Superuser...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A quick count from the Superuser homepage reveals that at least 14 currently featured questions should be closed off topic.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, should we even close question as off topic when they are on topic on Superuser but an in beta SE site on the topic is online? Especially since I don't see an in beta SE site as fully operational. (*careful: &quot;worthy&quot;*)" />
  <row Id="3185" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1560" RevisionGUID="a0e90eb8-5e8d-4269-ad9b-3691a188d96b" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:43:39.247" UserId="4377" Text="I could've sworn I voted it as Subjective. Coming to the question: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; I just purchased vmware workstation 7 and I am trying to decide what the best host is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't see how anyone can *objectively* answer this question. Before the question was closed, I see that there's an answer by your stating you run majority of today's operating systems fine. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Another n persons might post that &lt;y&gt; host the teh best! How do you quantify &quot;best&quot; ? How will 5 OS recommendations from 5 different people help the person who's trying to the find the &quot;best&quot; for his needs. Never mind that OP has not mentioned what his understanding of best is - or the fact that what's best to you might be worst to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Pretty much why I voted to close. I don't see any re-open votes on it either, so I'm assuming the community feels that it was perhaps best to close. " />
  <row Id="3186" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1555" RevisionGUID="1490046c-7e0e-4e76-98a9-5c2bd00a183d" CreationDate="2010-10-11T22:49:29.970" UserId="4377" Comment="clarified my answer" Text="&gt; Is it bad protocol to go back and cleanup questions and answers to make them a higher quality&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, that's actually a good thing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The point of a continuously edited questions and answers site is that the people seeking the information can find it right away, without having to jump through hoops and pages long discussions. Consolidating and cleaning will help not only others who are seeking the same, it will help you in the future. &#xD;&#xA;(Yes I'm speaking from personal experience).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3187" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1561" RevisionGUID="e41c3450-ab8b-41b8-8a8e-607dbe780d27" CreationDate="2010-10-12T17:49:55.290" UserId="35950" Text="Is there a place where useful information can be posted without actually asking a question?  For example, while doing some research, just prior to asking a question on SuperUser, I found the answer.  It isn't something very obvious or intuitive though, and it'd be nice to post it somewhere, so others (or myself) can find it in the future.  I've seen the check-boxes for the &quot;community wiki,&quot; but I've never seen it.  What/Where is it?" />
  <row Id="3188" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1561" RevisionGUID="e41c3450-ab8b-41b8-8a8e-607dbe780d27" CreationDate="2010-10-12T17:49:55.290" UserId="35950" Text="Posting Useful Information" />
  <row Id="3189" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1561" RevisionGUID="e41c3450-ab8b-41b8-8a8e-607dbe780d27" CreationDate="2010-10-12T17:49:55.290" UserId="35950" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="3190" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1562" RevisionGUID="0c4353bd-5dec-4323-a4f3-f4682447bc7e" CreationDate="2010-10-12T18:12:40.137" UserId="2013" Text="Ask the question as if you hadn't found the answer, then answer the question yourself. This behaviour is in fact encouraged.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you are lucky you may even get an answer that is better than the one you found. But if this does not happen you can accept your own answer after 48 hours.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You should **NOT** make it a wiki, if the question and the answer are good you deserve the up votes.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3191" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1561" RevisionGUID="4f8e63a6-07a6-40f7-bc04-577a32de107c" CreationDate="2010-10-12T18:23:26.797" UserId="4377" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;&lt;jeopardy&gt;" />
  <row Id="3192" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1563" RevisionGUID="7b7e023d-52e2-481d-9407-90853ad7ff65" CreationDate="2010-10-13T06:27:57.960" UserId="51353" Text="Hi,&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there a way to &quot;subscribe&quot;/ follow an interesting question without replying to it?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Best regards," />
  <row Id="3193" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1563" RevisionGUID="7b7e023d-52e2-481d-9407-90853ad7ff65" CreationDate="2010-10-13T06:27:57.960" UserId="51353" Text="Following a question" />
  <row Id="3194" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1563" RevisionGUID="7b7e023d-52e2-481d-9407-90853ad7ff65" CreationDate="2010-10-13T06:27:57.960" UserId="51353" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;" />
  <row Id="3195" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1564" RevisionGUID="ac593ee9-7658-4a61-ae1c-05698ce563b1" CreationDate="2010-10-13T07:39:40.600" UserId="39366" Text="You can click the star icon to tag it as a &quot;favorite&quot;, it will then appear on your favorites list on your profile page where you can access them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I know some users do this, but I personally prefer to just bookmark them." />
  <row Id="3196" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1565" RevisionGUID="dd355914-8ab9-4976-b50e-250a91bafd27" CreationDate="2010-10-13T08:15:21.210" UserId="3981" Text="Just a side-note.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Although there are overlap, it is up to the more mature sites to assist and help other SE sites grow and reach potential. This question was closed because it had a better chance of getting answers from a site focussed on Latex. As a norm based on the **level** of the question, if the community believes it will get a better response from a more specific target audience, it will be done. That question was around a few hours before migration, and didn't gain a single answer. It made sense to migrate, and in this case close and manually move the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some questions are rated on individual basis, and sometimes a decision will be made to best assist the user that posted the question. It doesn't mean it is going to become the rule. As with everything, there are edge cases, and this happened to be one of them." />
  <row Id="3197" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1566" RevisionGUID="1095fc7a-253c-4946-955c-694fe8866ec1" CreationDate="2010-10-13T13:57:55.283" UserId="51382" Text="This functionality might be here already but I could not figure it out. If not, i feel that sometimes you want to ask people questions or defend a question. Without spamming the comments would it be worth having the ability to send private messages? Thought?" />
  <row Id="3198" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1566" RevisionGUID="1095fc7a-253c-4946-955c-694fe8866ec1" CreationDate="2010-10-13T13:57:55.283" UserId="51382" Text="SHould we be able to send users private messages?" />
  <row Id="3199" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1566" RevisionGUID="1095fc7a-253c-4946-955c-694fe8866ec1" CreationDate="2010-10-13T13:57:55.283" UserId="51382" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;messaging&gt;" />
  <row Id="3200" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1567" RevisionGUID="91f74252-4fab-4f24-b610-a5fd747a46b5" CreationDate="2010-10-13T14:20:00.017" UserId="3981" Text="You can. Click on the chat link in the top menu of links. It's not private but you can interact with users real time. Otherwise comments are the only way.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Any other forms of private messaging has always been declined, and this would be no exception, especially with the chat officially available." />
  <row Id="3201" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1563" RevisionGUID="9196df2b-a943-40c6-9a98-9b0f631167a4" CreationDate="2010-10-13T17:38:02.593" UserId="4377" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="3202" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1548" RevisionGUID="22913cc3-a37b-481e-8e6a-f19b024a4d88" CreationDate="2010-10-14T07:41:17.583" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-declined&gt;" />
  <row Id="3203" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1568" RevisionGUID="c7500a7f-8205-4f23-938c-d61d27e66c68" CreationDate="2010-10-14T07:45:58.790" UserId="1" Text="- this reminder only happens for users with low-ish reputation&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- we'd rather let someone attempt to do something, and explain why they can't, then just make it invisible or disabled." />
  <row Id="3204" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1333" RevisionGUID="ea8ef715-4c15-4313-9cd0-532ac0270590" CreationDate="2010-10-14T07:46:32.283" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;community-wiki&gt;" />
  <row Id="3205" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1569" RevisionGUID="284d6712-fc22-4ce9-87de-ec4148cacf3c" CreationDate="2010-10-14T08:19:58.410" UserId="289" Text="This has now been implemented with a mechanism for all sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/63961/adapt-close-dialog-ui-for-upcoming-avalanche-of-stackexchange-2-0-graduates" />
  <row Id="3206" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1570" RevisionGUID="8931c885-5c35-4b5a-be44-459031e7e5b2" CreationDate="2010-10-14T08:57:26.077" UserId="13567" Text="He [answered][1] one of my questions and then I browsed his [answers][2] only to find out that he is a spammer. All answers are the same and are commending a shareware. I demand deletion of his account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;name: [bencody01][3]  &#xD;&#xA;member for: 3 days&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/56122/transferring-videos-from-sony-video-camera-to-pc-via-usb-connection/199336#199336&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/users/52057/bencody01&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/users/52057/bencody01" />
  <row Id="3207" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1570" RevisionGUID="8931c885-5c35-4b5a-be44-459031e7e5b2" CreationDate="2010-10-14T08:57:26.077" UserId="13567" Text="I found a 3-day-old spammer" />
  <row Id="3208" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1570" RevisionGUID="8931c885-5c35-4b5a-be44-459031e7e5b2" CreationDate="2010-10-14T08:57:26.077" UserId="13567" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;user-accounts&gt;" />
  <row Id="3209" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1571" RevisionGUID="ebfb1707-7786-4dfb-b850-5d6a778aab35" CreationDate="2010-10-14T09:09:27.997" UserId="3981" Text="What? Where? Can't be?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no such thing as spammers on Super User." />
  <row Id="3210" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1570" RevisionGUID="89b908ec-ad0e-4fb9-9115-0fd6d36ac04b" CreationDate="2010-10-14T09:09:52.020" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;spam&gt;&lt;user-accounts&gt;" />
  <row Id="3211" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1547" RevisionGUID="c81a789e-0904-465e-8213-5f304522ae05" CreationDate="2010-10-14T09:51:23.590" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="3212" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1572" RevisionGUID="8485a265-ecd7-4d84-bd4b-4a0fc6bff307" CreationDate="2010-10-14T10:14:48.363" UserId="289" Text="With 3341+ questions tagged [ubuntu](http://superuser.com/tagged/ubuntu) this would seem a good migration option." />
  <row Id="3213" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1572" RevisionGUID="8485a265-ecd7-4d84-bd4b-4a0fc6bff307" CreationDate="2010-10-14T10:14:48.363" UserId="289" Text="Can we have an option to migrate to AskUbuntu?" />
  <row Id="3214" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1572" RevisionGUID="8485a265-ecd7-4d84-bd4b-4a0fc6bff307" CreationDate="2010-10-14T10:14:48.363" UserId="289" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="3215" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1573" RevisionGUID="ec1d68ee-f58f-400b-9b85-1d0ec5d749ce" CreationDate="2010-10-14T10:34:25.213" UserId="34844" Text="True and I agree, yet I'm against migrating all already existent questions to AskUbuntu." />
  <row Id="3216" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1573" RevisionGUID="35622d8f-6f9f-4b55-8851-97b5d07e3662" CreationDate="2010-10-14T10:52:51.710" UserId="34844" Comment="added 128 characters in body" Text="True and I agree, yet I'm against migrating all already existent questions to AskUbuntu.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, check out this blogpost http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/10/new-question-migration-paths/ about new migration paths." />
  <row Id="3217" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1572" RevisionGUID="b8f384d2-fa14-4f47-b2b8-be6df6c22121" CreationDate="2010-10-14T11:40:40.560" UserId="289" Comment="more info" Text="With 3341+ questions tagged [ubuntu](http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ubuntu) this would seem a good migration option?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most recent ones are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/199366/how-can-i-change-my-uid-without-opening-another-user-account  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/199365/vmware-linux-headers-not-found-for-ubuntu-10-10  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/199285/copy-image-to-clipboard-in-ubuntu&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3218" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1572" RevisionGUID="ce2c832d-7972-4494-b18d-39e846f27c2d" CreationDate="2010-10-14T12:01:19.497" UserId="289" Comment="changed tone of question" Text="With 3341+ questions tagged [ubuntu](http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/ubuntu) would this seem a good migration option?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The most recent ones are:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/199366/how-can-i-change-my-uid-without-opening-another-user-account  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/199365/vmware-linux-headers-not-found-for-ubuntu-10-10  &#xD;&#xA;http://superuser.com/questions/199285/copy-image-to-clipboard-in-ubuntu&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3219" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1572" RevisionGUID="ce2c832d-7972-4494-b18d-39e846f27c2d" CreationDate="2010-10-14T12:01:19.497" UserId="289" Comment="changed tone of question" Text="Do we want to have an option to migrate to AskUbuntu?" />
  <row Id="3220" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1574" RevisionGUID="accec835-4f7b-40c9-a0d7-12b1a05cdebd" CreationDate="2010-10-14T12:29:45.957" UserId="3981" Text="I don't see any harm in doing so. My biggest concern is educating the community that not every question needs to be migrated, and although Super User moderators are known for having a very strict closing policy, some questions have their merits on Super User rather then AskUbuntu. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I do think the close reason would be useful." />
  <row Id="3221" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1575" RevisionGUID="2b406d82-c9e8-45f0-b4fe-923b54e359f5" CreationDate="2010-10-14T16:10:04.173" UserId="4377" Text="This is bit of a yes-and-no situation. The option to migrate would be handy, but this might result in *all* questions being migrated. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What I suggest is to let the question remain on Super User. If the question seems a bit tricky/convoluted , perhaps leave a comment stating that the OP might get better answers on Ubuntu ?" />
  <row Id="3222" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1576" RevisionGUID="575d7ef4-d6fa-4a07-85f5-54ae8f7582c0" CreationDate="2010-10-14T17:47:26.333" UserId="1100" Text="Every question also has an RSS feed. You can follow in whatever your favorite feed reader is.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For instance, the RSS feed for this question is&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;`http://meta.superuser.com/feeds/question/1563`" />
  <row Id="3223" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1574" RevisionGUID="be4a4581-d9a5-4928-8d7b-bdc09ea84493" CreationDate="2010-10-14T18:20:59.290" UserId="3981" Comment="added 132 characters in body" Text="I don't see any harm in doing so. My biggest concern is educating the community that not every question needs to be migrated, and although Super User moderators are known for having a very strict closing policy, some questions have their merits on Super User rather then AskUbuntu. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However I do think the close reason would be useful.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*There is an expanded discussion of what I meant with this in the comments. It might add more value then my actual answer does.*" />
  <row Id="3224" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1577" RevisionGUID="41144ea9-5bfe-4bc6-a110-a53e198dac8b" CreationDate="2010-10-15T16:14:48.260" UserId="34523" Text="**Just asked my first question on SuperUser**, and found it to be the most appropriate category among the stack exchange sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**However, it was immediately migrated to &quot;webapps&quot;**, an unrelated and not really popular stack exchange partner site. There is apparently no way to comment upon its transfer, or question to the moderators.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Assuming this is going to happen again if I embark upon a forums career here at superuser, so: &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Is there a way I can appeal to the moderators to have a question untransferred?**" />
  <row Id="3225" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1577" RevisionGUID="41144ea9-5bfe-4bc6-a110-a53e198dac8b" CreationDate="2010-10-15T16:14:48.260" UserId="34523" Text="Possible to &quot;protest&quot; the transfer of a question to another forum?" />
  <row Id="3226" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1577" RevisionGUID="41144ea9-5bfe-4bc6-a110-a53e198dac8b" CreationDate="2010-10-15T16:14:48.260" UserId="34523" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;migration&gt;&lt;moderators&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;stack-exchange&gt;" />
  <row Id="3227" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1578" RevisionGUID="59c69aee-10d7-45cb-92e8-b9d9811c27fc" CreationDate="2010-10-15T16:42:02.550" UserId="3981" Text="If you are referring to [this](http://superuser.com/questions/199199/limit-search-among-a-set-of-websites-with-google-chrome-closed) question, it was migrated because it does not meet the requirements for Super User, as described in the [FAQ](http://superuser.com). It is related to a website, albeit the SE network itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, I don't really consider that a question, since you answered it yourself, and it was more a tip, since you don't need to create the search yourself in Chrome as it is automatically added to the search list the first time you visit the site with Chrome, as are all the other sites in the SE network. Why not just create a blog post about? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It was either going to be migrated to [Web Apps](http://webapps.stackexchange.com), or it could as a long shot belongs on [MSO](http://meta.stackoverflow.com) if anywhere on the SE network, however it would most likely have been closed on the latter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; an unrelated and not really popular stack exchange partner site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually, Web Apps is a just launched official Stack Exchange site, and it's purpose is to take exactly the type of questions you asked. It's the first site to ever leave Beta and should by no means be underestimated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before posting questions on Super User please read the [FAQ](http://superuser.com/faq]. Once done spend some time learning how the site works. The first and most important thing to understand is **Super User is not a forum**. It is a Q&amp;A site and has a very strict closing and moderation policy, which encourages high quality questions and answers." />
  <row Id="3228" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1577" RevisionGUID="bf26862d-6e7d-439b-b502-3b403d1ec3d6" CreationDate="2010-10-15T16:44:35.810" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-declined&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;migration&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="3229" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1578" RevisionGUID="886899ea-28d5-471a-9db3-70e134de3588" CreationDate="2010-10-15T16:48:24.953" UserId="39366" Comment="fixed link" Text="If you are referring to [this](http://superuser.com/questions/199199/limit-search-among-a-set-of-websites-with-google-chrome-closed) question, it was migrated because it does not meet the requirements for Super User, as described in the [FAQ](http://superuser.com). It is related to a website, albeit the SE network itself.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, I don't really consider that a question, since you answered it yourself, and it was more a tip, since you don't need to create the search yourself in Chrome as it is automatically added to the search list the first time you visit the site with Chrome, as are all the other sites in the SE network. Why not just create a blog post about? &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;It was either going to be migrated to [Web Apps](http://webapps.stackexchange.com), or it could as a long shot belongs on [MSO](http://meta.stackoverflow.com) if anywhere on the SE network, however it would most likely have been closed on the latter.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; an unrelated and not really popular stack exchange partner site&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Actually, Web Apps is a just launched official Stack Exchange site, and it's purpose is to take exactly the type of questions you asked. It's the first site to ever leave Beta and should by no means be underestimated.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Before posting questions on Super User please read the [FAQ](http://superuser.com/faq). Once done spend some time learning how the site works. The first and most important thing to understand is **Super User is not a forum**. It is a Q&amp;A site and has a very strict closing and moderation policy, which encourages high quality questions and answers." />
  <row Id="3237" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1581" RevisionGUID="504f5c47-c394-49ee-be9b-627a5d925cbb" CreationDate="2010-10-15T22:17:21.460" UserId="42315" Text="If you feel your question has been unjustly migrated, you can ask another question, putting things in a different light that avoid the reason for the migration. For example, since part of the Super User community strongly rejects web application questions, SU questions that tangentially relate to web applications need to be formulated in a way that makes it clear that you want a local solution.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For example, in the [specific question you allude to](http://superuser.com/questions/199199), if you care about an answer that doesn't depend on a web application, you could replace the Stack Exchange example by an example involving an intranet or Google Desktop as part of the search locations to combine.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3238" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1454" RevisionGUID="3f872700-74f4-46a3-ad98-2b36a9b58698" CreationDate="2010-10-16T03:49:07.693" UserId="4377" Comment="added 47 characters in body" Text="Not sure if this should just be here or if I should post on [Meta.Stackoverflow][1] - please can a mod move if you think it should be there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When writing answers, one of the items that takes me the longest is to type the keyboard code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;      &lt;kbd&gt; &lt;/kbd&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I am not saying it takes hours, or is a major problem, but it is an inconvenience and &#xD;&#xA; I think that this would make an excellent addition.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com" />
  <row Id="3239" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1582" RevisionGUID="54f906d5-83d2-476f-a7a7-9da2662ba792" CreationDate="2010-10-16T05:08:25.133" UserId="4377" Text="`[status-complete]` + there's a synonym mapping for `[disconnect]` -&gt; `[disconnects]`" />
  <row Id="3240" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1583" RevisionGUID="2d816f78-ffd0-48a4-ab3e-3e97b2474154" CreationDate="2010-10-16T05:43:04.373" UserId="1" Text="Summary: no, I don't think we should unlock this migration path.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As with all things unix, that to me is a bit of a special case.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I view it thusly:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Super User is for computer enthusiasts, who love OS X, Windows and Linux — and for that matter, all software and hardware — equally.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Unix/Linux is for people who love unixes of all flavors and types.. but probably hate Windows and only begrudgingly use Macs now that they are unix-y.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ubuntu is for people who love just one type of unix: Ubuntu. They are on a holy mission to create the “unix for the rest of us”.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;These audiences are really quite different in their approach, goals, and what they love and hate. I’m disinclined to allow a lot of arbitrary migration between them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But in GENERAL, yes, we don’t want that kind of serious topic overlap between sites. Unix is just .. special.. in this regard. See Joel’s post: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/09/fork-it/" />
  <row Id="3241" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1584" RevisionGUID="88f0a2ae-0c4c-4a04-818e-7030ae19f739" CreationDate="2010-10-16T05:52:02.203" UserId="1" Text="This question sort of falls between two worlds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On one hand it is about the Google Chrome web browser (kind of) and that is on-topic for SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;On the other hand it's about doing a Google search, which is on-topic for Webapps.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Bit of a borderline case. I would argue the question is *more* about the cleverness of constructing a google search that does what you want instead of the browser itself, though.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So I support the closing but I don't feel strongly about it." />
  <row Id="3242" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1585" RevisionGUID="bf752c0a-f008-43f8-bfd1-53d561ba1180" CreationDate="2010-10-16T17:18:33.207" UserId="47225" Text="Having just recieved the ability to vote-to-close questions I have seen the option of &quot;Too localized&quot;.  My question is at what point is the question too localized?  I personally have asked questions that are specific to my needs and conditions.  The answers could in some ways help a few down the road, but not to the general public.  [For example.](http://superuser.com/questions/184868/system-critical-error-kernel-power-and-crash)" />
  <row Id="3243" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1585" RevisionGUID="bf752c0a-f008-43f8-bfd1-53d561ba1180" CreationDate="2010-10-16T17:18:33.207" UserId="47225" Text="What does &quot;too localized&quot; really entail?" />
  <row Id="3244" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1585" RevisionGUID="bf752c0a-f008-43f8-bfd1-53d561ba1180" CreationDate="2010-10-16T17:18:33.207" UserId="47225" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;&lt;voting&gt;" />
  <row Id="3245" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1586" RevisionGUID="f571f6e9-487e-4fdc-983b-a4887a38b848" CreationDate="2010-10-16T18:25:43.880" UserId="3981" Text="As the description states, it is a question that has too narrow a focus. For example, asking what the best Service Provider is in the UK, or asking about a particular product which is specific to a certain company and not well known.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is not often used, and when it does moderators normally intervene to ensure it is used for the correct purpose. There is enough cases where it is the only close reason that make sense and therefore it was added to the list." />
  <row Id="3246" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="927" RevisionGUID="2a115caf-0f66-4600-af5f-4b84eb9d74d6" CreationDate="2010-10-16T21:01:56.363" UserId="2013" Comment="added 1 characters in body" Text="We have a number of questions on SuperUser, asking which Linux distribution to use on the poster's old PC, and giving specs of said old PC. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;A number of these questions have been closed as Duplicate. Which seems reasonable except that the correct answer for a PII/128Mb machine isn't the best answer for a 1GHz P4/1Gb machine.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As quack quixote [notes][1], we can't leave them separate, or it would be appropriate to close them as too localized.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is there some better way we could handle these questions?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Perhaps we need to come up with a good general question, and then redirect all the existing questions to that one?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Questions:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/127037/leightweight-linux-distro-to-install-on-my-old-pc&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/73912/lightweight-gui-linux-distribution-for-really-old-computer&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/64516/suggested-lightweight-linux-distro-to-run-side-by-side-windows&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/57592/best-linux-distro-for-home-usage-closed&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/10067/whats-the-quickest-distro-to-get-up-and-running-with&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/1967/good-linux-distributions-for-newbies&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/132121/easy-linux-distribution-with-newer-packages-than-ubuntu&#xD;&#xA; - http://superuser.com/questions/136257/how-to-build-or-find-smallest-linux-with-only-lamp&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/127037/leightweight-linux-distro-to-install-on-my-old-pc" />
  <row Id="3247" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1587" RevisionGUID="591e970a-393b-4d7e-bffe-7ecbe024de4b" CreationDate="2010-10-17T03:37:32.173" UserId="32592" Text="As you might guess, I'm asking because it recently happened. I wasn't too sure if I was better to ask it here or on the Stack Overflow meta (since it also serves as the Stack Exchange meta site), but after reading the accepted answer of [this similar question on Meta Stack Overflow][1], I thought I should ask here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got into a (relatively calm) argument with Diago, who's probably an all-around great guy, since he's a moderator on both Super User and Meta Stack Overflow. However, I believe he's pushed the envelope a little when it came to my question, that I'll expose here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my question [What's the difference between i5 and i7 in MacBook Pros?][2], I exchanged several comments with him. He decided to close it because it appeared subjective and argumentative to him, and that there is no way to answer the question objectively.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I disagreed, he told me I should read the FAQ; which I did, and I did not find any offending point. My question is about computer hardware, and is not a shopping or buying recommendation since I already own a MacBook Pro with an i7 processor. I did not realize this could be in question until he mentioned it a few comments later, after I rephrased the question in a comment that could indeed induce confusion about if my question was a shopping recommendation or not (though, I can assure you, it's not: as I have already mentioned, I already own an i7 MacBook Pro).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As of the subjective side of the question, I suppose the subjectiveness of a question is indeed subjective, because I still don't see it. I mean, what I asked for could be (and was) answered in terms of raw data–where's subjectivity when all there is to do is to compare numbers? It wasn't even about prices.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides having my question closed, I was also accused of misleading readers into believing the i5 processors offered in MacBook Pros are hyperthreaded–which I actually genuinely believe, as does [MacWorld][3], [MacWorld UK][4], [The Mac Observer][5], [PCWorld][6], [Tech Radar][7], [Apple][8] themselves (scroll down to the _Hyper-threading_ paragraph) and probably a myriad of other sites I'd know if I visited more than the first page of Google results for `macbook pro i5 hyperthreading`. Intel does [list mobile i5 processors with hyperthreading][9], so it clearly is possible that Apple uses them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is even the actual reason of my question: I was surprised that i5 had hyperthreading, and I was left wondering what i7 had better than i5 since both are hyperthreaded dual-cores.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what should I do? Was I being subjective, wrong and stubborn from the beginning, or was there really a misunderstanding and the question deserves to be reopened (even though it's already answered)? How can you determine if a question is subjective, even before trying to decide if it's a &quot;good subjective question&quot;? Is there a way I could edit my question that would leave out any kind of subjectivity there could have been? (I've already edited it a few times, even after it's been closed; if you're curious you should [have a look at its history][10].)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/29994/disagreeing-with-a-decision-to-close-a-question&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/200150/whats-the-difference-between-i5-processors-and-i7-processors-in-macbook-pros&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.macworld.com/article/150589/2010/04/corei5i7_mbp.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/reviews/index.cfm?reviewid=3224196&amp;pn=1&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/the_new_macbook_pros_1517-inch_are_not_quad_core/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/194443/benchmarks_15inch_24ghz_core_i5_macbook_pro.html&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.techradar.com/reviews/pc-mac/laptops-portable-pcs/laptops-and-netbooks/apple-macbook-pro-17-core-i5-2-53ghz--691078/review&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/performance.html&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=43483&amp;MarketSegment=MBL&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://superuser.com/posts/200150/revisions" />
  <row Id="3248" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1587" RevisionGUID="591e970a-393b-4d7e-bffe-7ecbe024de4b" CreationDate="2010-10-17T03:37:32.173" UserId="32592" Text="What can you do when you disagree with a moderator?" />
  <row Id="3249" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1587" RevisionGUID="591e970a-393b-4d7e-bffe-7ecbe024de4b" CreationDate="2010-10-17T03:37:32.173" UserId="32592" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;" />
  <row Id="3250" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1587" RevisionGUID="f0f4527d-030e-483c-aa7a-b17a990270be" CreationDate="2010-10-17T04:29:01.880" UserId="32592" Comment="Fixed all kinds of grammar errors, ugly phrasings and more stuff. Sorry guys, English is my second language." Text="As you might guess, I'm asking because it recently happened. I wasn't too sure if I was better to ask here or on the Stack Overflow meta (since it also serves as the Stack Exchange meta site), but after reading the accepted answer of [this similar question on Meta Stack Overflow][1], I thought I should ask here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got into a (rather calm) argument with Diago, who's probably an all-around great guy, since he's a moderator on both Super User and Meta Stack Overflow (and here; hello Diago!) The problem, I suppose, is that he more readily sees subjectivity where I don't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my question [What's the difference between i5 and i7 in MacBook Pros?][2], I exchanged several comments with him. He decided to close it because it appeared subjective and argumentative to him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I disagreed, he told me I should read the FAQ. I did, and I did not find any offending point. My question was about computer hardware, and was not a shopping or buying recommendation since I already own a MacBook Pro with an i7 processor. I did not realize this could be in question until he mentioned it a few comments later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As of the subjective side of the question, as I wrote above, I still don't see it. I mean, what I asked for could be (and was) answered in terms of numerical facts–where's subjectivity when all there is to do is to compare numbers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides having my question closed, I was also accused of misleading readers into believing the i5 processors offered in MacBook Pros are hyperthreaded. However, I genuinely believe they are, as does [MacWorld][3], [MacWorld UK][4], [The Mac Observer][5], [PCWorld][6], [Tech Radar][7], [Apple][8] themselves (scroll down to the _Hyper-threading_ paragraph) and probably a myriad of other sites I'd know if I visited more than the first page of Google results for `macbook pro i5 hyperthreading`. Intel does [list mobile i5 processors with hyperthreading][9], so it seems possible that Apple uses them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is even the actual reason of my question: I was surprised that i5 had hyperthreading, and I was left wondering what i7 had better than i5 since both are hyperthreaded dual-cores.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what should I do? Was I being subjective, wrong and stubborn from the beginning, or was there a misunderstanding and the question deserves to be reopened (even though it's already answered)? How can you determine if a question is subjective, even before trying to decide if it's a &quot;good subjective question&quot;? Is there a way I could edit my question that would leave out any kind of subjectivity there could have been? (I've already edited it a few times, even after it's been closed; if you're curious you should [have a look at its history][10].)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/29994/disagreeing-with-a-decision-to-close-a-question&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/200150/whats-the-difference-between-i5-processors-and-i7-processors-in-macbook-pros&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.macworld.com/article/150589/2010/04/corei5i7_mbp.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/reviews/index.cfm?reviewid=3224196&amp;pn=1&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/the_new_macbook_pros_1517-inch_are_not_quad_core/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/194443/benchmarks_15inch_24ghz_core_i5_macbook_pro.html&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.techradar.com/reviews/pc-mac/laptops-portable-pcs/laptops-and-netbooks/apple-macbook-pro-17-core-i5-2-53ghz--691078/review&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/performance.html&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=43483&amp;MarketSegment=MBL&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://superuser.com/posts/200150/revisions" />
  <row Id="3251" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1588" RevisionGUID="df0148ff-2400-44ff-bf49-747407b58458" CreationDate="2010-10-17T05:59:18.810" UserId="47225" Text="As parts of this question may have already been answered in the above commented link, I will only add a few things to what they have said.  First off if a moderator closes a question and other feel that it was closed for the wrong reasons, those with voting power can reopen the question.  Yes some moderation can be &quot;subjective&quot; itself, but also realize that most if not all moderators are doing their best to keep Super User and the SU users best interests in mind.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Subjective questions are **highly** moderated for the reason of keeping the SU environment a clean and clear question/answering site.  Opinionated questions not only clutter the site, but can also misdirect the those asking the question with differing and almost endless opinions.  In your case the simple question &quot;_what makes the i7 better_&quot; is where I feel it makes the question subjective.  Possibly rewording the question would help the overall goal of yourself and the SU community.  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As I am not Diago and cannot speak for the exact reasons of why he closed the question and so therefore this is my personal understanding of the situation.  " />
  <row Id="3252" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1589" RevisionGUID="cfd15df6-e26c-48fa-9659-047984e69bb7" CreationDate="2010-10-17T09:00:58.450" UserId="3981" Text="*For the record. This question is now deleted.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kronos already made it fairly clear why I closed it, asking for opinions or why something vs something else is better is by nature, subjective. This means that at some point someone is going to find it on a Google search, which incidentally is pretty much within an hour of it being asked with regards to SU, and it is going to start a flamewar. Whether a question has an accepted answer or not is irrelevant. *The point is that the question will be found by a group of users we do not **want** on SU*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our role as moderators is simple. Do what is best for the community and the site as a whole. In some cases, some questions get closed because they will attract the wrong target audience for the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may not agree that comparisons are discussions, but I have yet to see a single question on SU that hasn't turned into one, and they are considered not acceptable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is your made a few assumptions posting the question that was incorrect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Super User is not a discussion forum.&#xD;&#xA;- Because there is an accepted answer no one will view the question again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for my personal comments, they were just that my personal comments, and in themselves proves that the question was subjective, as I did not believe the finding where correct or even complete." />
  <row Id="3253" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1589" RevisionGUID="e428f48b-7500-43d0-9671-f4196058e502" CreationDate="2010-10-17T09:07:05.957" UserId="3981" Comment="added 248 characters in body" Text="*For the record. This question is now deleted.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kronos already made it fairly clear why I closed it, asking for opinions or why something vs something else is better is by nature, subjective. This means that at some point someone is going to find it on a Google search, which incidentally is pretty much within an hour of it being asked with regards to SU, and it is going to start a flamewar. Whether a question has an accepted answer or not is irrelevant. *The point is that the question will be found by a group of users we do not **want** on SU*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our role as moderators is simple. Do what is best for the community and the site as a whole. In some cases, some questions get closed because they will attract the wrong target audience for the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may not agree that comparisons are discussions, but I have yet to see a single question on SU that hasn't turned into one, and they are considered not acceptable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is your made a few assumptions posting the question that was incorrect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Super User is not a discussion forum.&#xD;&#xA;- Because there is an accepted answer no one will view the question again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for my personal comments, they were just that my personal comments, and in themselves proves that the question was subjective, as I did not believe the finding where correct or even complete. Here is another personal comment:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I have yet to find a user that will ever agree that their own question is subjective, and as much as I respect their opinion, in some cases what is better for the community and the site is much more important*" />
  <row Id="3254" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1589" RevisionGUID="f4c2d6dc-bad3-4261-b1b6-07a6a8073216" CreationDate="2010-10-17T11:30:24.590" UserId="3981" Comment="added 391 characters in body" Text="*For the record. This question is now deleted.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**To answer your direct question**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you disagree with a moderator you can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Email moderators directly. Their contact info is normally in their profiles.&#xD;&#xA;- Post on the meta specific website, in this case here. *(Which you have done)*&#xD;&#xA;- Email team@superuser.com if it is a case of abuse or more serious not resolved from the above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**With regards to the particular question**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kronos already made it fairly clear why I closed it, asking for opinions or why something vs something else is better is by nature, subjective. This means that at some point someone is going to find it on a Google search, which incidentally is pretty much within an hour of it being asked with regards to SU, and it is going to start a flamewar. Whether a question has an accepted answer or not is irrelevant. *The point is that the question will be found by a group of users we do not **want** on SU*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our role as moderators is simple. Do what is best for the community and the site as a whole. In some cases, some questions get closed because they will attract the wrong target audience for the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may not agree that comparisons are discussions, but I have yet to see a single question on SU that hasn't turned into one, and they are considered not acceptable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is your made a few assumptions posting the question that was incorrect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Super User is not a discussion forum.&#xD;&#xA;- Because there is an accepted answer no one will view the question again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for my personal comments, they were just that my personal comments, and in themselves proves that the question was subjective, as I did not believe the finding where correct or even complete. Here is another personal comment:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I have yet to find a user that will ever agree that their own question is subjective, and as much as I respect their opinion, in some cases what is better for the community and the site is much more important*" />
  <row Id="3255" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1590" RevisionGUID="a5b2448f-867e-4d4e-9e6e-2153c2867c89" CreationDate="2010-10-17T11:53:14.207" UserId="42315" Text="Why was [this question](http://superuser.com/questions/200337/access-laptop-hard-drive-via-usb) closed?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![access laptop hard drive via USB? closed as off-topic by Nifle, Diago♦][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I can't see how it does not relate to computer hardware.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://i.imgur.com/2etN1.png" />
  <row Id="3256" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1590" RevisionGUID="a5b2448f-867e-4d4e-9e6e-2153c2867c89" CreationDate="2010-10-17T11:53:14.207" UserId="42315" Text="Why was this question about computer hardware closed as off-topic?" />
  <row Id="3257" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1590" RevisionGUID="a5b2448f-867e-4d4e-9e6e-2153c2867c89" CreationDate="2010-10-17T11:53:14.207" UserId="42315" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;close-reasons&gt;" />
  <row Id="3258" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1591" RevisionGUID="fae191c9-60cf-4696-a341-e40a64793c33" CreationDate="2010-10-17T15:12:54.230" UserId="3981" Text="To be honest I should have closed it as Not a real question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Both the answers it attracted specified that a google search for that exact term provided answers, and to be honest, the way it is phrased it really is just a Yes question. Although AndrejaKo's answer expands a little, it still provides a Google search.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Considering how quickly Super User is growing, the quality of questions are also as important. Basically the question answer would be Yes and the a list of casings to purchase, which makes it a shopping recommendation. " />
  <row Id="3259" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1589" RevisionGUID="3e590b11-bbca-4bdb-90a8-4ee157d9c6b1" CreationDate="2010-10-17T16:01:54.750" UserId="47225" Comment="Changed &quot;your&quot; to &quot;you&quot;" Text="*For the record. This question is now deleted.*&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**To answer your direct question**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you disagree with a moderator you can:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Email moderators directly. Their contact info is normally in their profiles.&#xD;&#xA;- Post on the meta specific website, in this case here. *(Which you have done)*&#xD;&#xA;- Email team@superuser.com if it is a case of abuse or more serious not resolved from the above.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**With regards to the particular question**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Kronos already made it fairly clear why I closed it, asking for opinions or why something vs something else is better is by nature, subjective. This means that at some point someone is going to find it on a Google search, which incidentally is pretty much within an hour of it being asked with regards to SU, and it is going to start a flamewar. Whether a question has an accepted answer or not is irrelevant. *The point is that the question will be found by a group of users we do not **want** on SU*.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Our role as moderators is simple. Do what is best for the community and the site as a whole. In some cases, some questions get closed because they will attract the wrong target audience for the site. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You may not agree that comparisons are discussions, but I have yet to see a single question on SU that hasn't turned into one, and they are considered not acceptable. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The problem is you made a few assumptions posting the question that was incorrect.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Super User is not a discussion forum.&#xD;&#xA;- Because there is an accepted answer no one will view the question again.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As for my personal comments, they were just that my personal comments, and in themselves proves that the question was subjective, as I did not believe the finding where correct or even complete. Here is another personal comment:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;*I have yet to find a user that will ever agree that their own question is subjective, and as much as I respect their opinion, in some cases what is better for the community and the site is much more important*" />
  <row Id="3260" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1592" RevisionGUID="7ac93637-fd5e-420a-829f-f23ddbb0fb89" CreationDate="2010-10-18T00:39:53.323" UserId="51597" Text="I have recently decided to change the email address that my Gravatar is associated with. In the end, I had to create a new Gravatar account with the different email address. After doing this, I successfully changed my email address for my StackOverflow, ServerFault, and AskUbuntu accounts. However, when I attempt to change my SuperUser email address, I get an error saying &quot;Oops! ... Email is already registered&quot;. If the email worked int eh other accounts, why is it not working here? " />
  <row Id="3261" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1592" RevisionGUID="7ac93637-fd5e-420a-829f-f23ddbb0fb89" CreationDate="2010-10-18T00:39:53.323" UserId="51597" Text="Why can I not change my email address in my profile?" />
  <row Id="3262" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1592" RevisionGUID="7ac93637-fd5e-420a-829f-f23ddbb0fb89" CreationDate="2010-10-18T00:39:53.323" UserId="51597" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;user-profiles&gt;&lt;gravatar&gt;" />
  <row Id="3263" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1593" RevisionGUID="8a7e4c58-3f74-401f-b951-d70c341f2622" CreationDate="2010-10-18T07:34:18.793" UserId="39366" Text="It looks like you've accidentally created two accounts on SU.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The one you've used to post this question - [51597][1] - is linked to accounts on the other sites and so is presumably your &quot;main&quot; account.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But there is another account ([51596][2]) which has your name and matches your gravatar (implying it is using your email address) of the accounts linked to the first.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;You need to get the two accounts merged, I believe the simplest way to do that is to flag one of your own posts of moderator attention asking for a merge and providing *both* your user IDs.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://superuser.com/users/51597&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://superuser.com/users/51596" />
  <row Id="3264" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1592" RevisionGUID="36c5ba24-650a-4516-b136-f57b5cf2c4d1" CreationDate="2010-10-18T09:14:12.507" UserId="3981" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;user-profiles&gt;&lt;gravatar&gt;" />
  <row Id="3265" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1594" RevisionGUID="462622e5-0c3b-4c9e-b872-5fce1cd7f0e9" CreationDate="2010-10-18T09:14:46.953" UserId="3981" Text="I have merged the two account DMA found into one here:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Ani Dev](http://superuser.com/users/51596)" />
  <row Id="3266" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1587" RevisionGUID="342671cb-7447-4c74-a366-2bdd6b9b123a" CreationDate="2010-10-18T15:34:29.543" UserId="32592" Comment="Rephrased the title so it doesn't look like I'm asking for the generic case." Text="I wasn't too sure if I was better to ask here or on the Stack Overflow meta (since it also serves as the Stack Exchange meta site), but after reading the accepted answer of [this similar question on Meta Stack Overflow][1], I thought I should ask here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I got into a (rather calm) argument with Diago, who's probably an all-around great guy, since he's a moderator on both Super User and Meta Stack Overflow (and here; hello Diago!) The problem, I suppose, is that he more readily sees subjectivity where I don't.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;In my question [What's the difference between i5 and i7 in MacBook Pros?][2], I exchanged several comments with him. He decided to close it because it appeared subjective and argumentative to him.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I disagreed, he told me I should read the FAQ. I did, and I did not find any offending point. My question was about computer hardware, and was not a shopping or buying recommendation since I already own a MacBook Pro with an i7 processor. I did not realize this could be in question until he mentioned it a few comments later.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As of the subjective side of the question, as I wrote above, I still don't see it. I mean, what I asked for could be (and was) answered in terms of numerical facts–where's subjectivity when all there is to do is to compare numbers?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Besides having my question closed, I was also accused of misleading readers into believing the i5 processors offered in MacBook Pros are hyperthreaded. However, I genuinely believe they are, as does [MacWorld][3], [MacWorld UK][4], [The Mac Observer][5], [PCWorld][6], [Tech Radar][7], [Apple][8] themselves (scroll down to the _Hyper-threading_ paragraph) and probably a myriad of other sites I'd know if I visited more than the first page of Google results for `macbook pro i5 hyperthreading`. Intel does [list mobile i5 processors with hyperthreading][9], so it seems possible that Apple uses them.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;This is even the actual reason of my question: I was surprised that i5 had hyperthreading, and I was left wondering what i7 had better than i5 since both are hyperthreaded dual-cores.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what should I do? Was I being subjective, wrong and stubborn from the beginning, or was there a misunderstanding and the question deserves to be reopened (even though it's already answered)? How can you determine if a question is subjective, even before trying to decide if it's a &quot;good subjective question&quot;? Is there a way I could edit my question that would leave out any kind of subjectivity there could have been? (I've already edited it a few times, even after it's been closed; if you're curious you should [have a look at its history][10].)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/29994/disagreeing-with-a-decision-to-close-a-question&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/200150/whats-the-difference-between-i5-processors-and-i7-processors-in-macbook-pros&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://www.macworld.com/article/150589/2010/04/corei5i7_mbp.html&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/reviews/index.cfm?reviewid=3224196&amp;pn=1&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/the_new_macbook_pros_1517-inch_are_not_quad_core/&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/194443/benchmarks_15inch_24ghz_core_i5_macbook_pro.html&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://www.techradar.com/reviews/pc-mac/laptops-portable-pcs/laptops-and-netbooks/apple-macbook-pro-17-core-i5-2-53ghz--691078/review&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/performance.html&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=43483&amp;MarketSegment=MBL&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://superuser.com/posts/200150/revisions" />
  <row Id="3267" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1587" RevisionGUID="342671cb-7447-4c74-a366-2bdd6b9b123a" CreationDate="2010-10-18T15:34:29.543" UserId="32592" Comment="Rephrased the title so it doesn't look like I'm asking for the generic case." Text="My question was closed and I find it unfair." />
  <row Id="3268" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1595" RevisionGUID="4fb94f12-12b9-4046-b1d1-7ee17ca1ede1" CreationDate="2010-10-19T03:26:42.827" UserId="4377" Text="As of now we have &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 39 questions tagged [cms][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 14 questions tagged [joomla][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 21 questions tagged [drupal][5]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][6]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - 22 questions tagged [wordpress][7]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][8]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And the questions on the above and other web master related keep coming it. Right now, the questions are either closed as off topic - or migrated to Web Apps and then the folks there  migrate then them over to Pro Web Masters. This really isn't the best approach, and I really don't like any of the SE2.0 sites being [considered as a dumpyard][9], I suggest the team to add an option for migration path to Pro Web Masters&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/tags/cms/synonyms&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/L1lLr.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/tags/joomla/synonyms&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.imgur.com/9FSXS.png&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://superuser.com/tags/drupal/synonyms&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://i.imgur.com/z6YAQ.png&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://superuser.com/tags/wordpress/synonyms&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://i.imgur.com/sjxAC.png&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1515/why-are-questions-off-topic-for-super-user-being-migrated-from-other-trilogy-site" />
  <row Id="3269" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1595" RevisionGUID="4fb94f12-12b9-4046-b1d1-7ee17ca1ede1" CreationDate="2010-10-19T03:26:42.827" UserId="4377" Text="Add a migration path to Pro Web Masters from Super User" />
  <row Id="3270" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1595" RevisionGUID="4fb94f12-12b9-4046-b1d1-7ee17ca1ede1" CreationDate="2010-10-19T03:26:42.827" UserId="4377" Text="&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;migration&gt;" />
  <row Id="3271" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1596" RevisionGUID="e77d659c-bb09-4982-82a7-3d7674e17c10" CreationDate="2010-10-19T05:40:43.850" UserId="47225" Text="With, what appears to me, an outbreak of questions regarding torrents, torrent downloads, and torrent download optimization I am wondering what we should do with these sort of questions.  Most torrent downloads are, in my opinion, used for illegal purposes.  There are some distributions of linux (ubunutu) that do use torrent downloads, but I feel that these are fewer and farther in between.  Therefore, should we automatically flag and vote to close questions that are torrent related?  If so, should the FAQ be updated with a specific mention of this?  If not, should we make sure that these questions are within the bounds of legality?" />
  <row Id="3272" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1596" RevisionGUID="e77d659c-bb09-4982-82a7-3d7674e17c10" CreationDate="2010-10-19T05:40:43.850" UserId="47225" Text="What to do about torrents?" />
  <row Id="3273" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1596" RevisionGUID="e77d659c-bb09-4982-82a7-3d7674e17c10" CreationDate="2010-10-19T05:40:43.850" UserId="47225" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;moderation&gt;&lt;vote-to-close&gt;" />
  <row Id="3274" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1596" RevisionGUID="4cad7992-ebeb-4e4f-b932-827dbd620617" CreationDate="2010-10-19T05:50:57.163" UserId="47225" Comment="added 798 characters in body" Text="With, what appears to me, an outbreak of questions regarding torrents, torrent downloads, and torrent download optimization I am wondering what we should do with these sort of questions.  Most torrent downloads are, in my opinion, used for illegal purposes.  There are some distributions of linux (ubunutu) that do use torrent downloads, but I feel that these are fewer and farther in between.  Therefore, should we automatically flag and vote to close questions that are torrent related?  If so, should the FAQ be updated with a specific mention of this?  If not, should we make sure that these questions are within the bounds of legality?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here are some examples that I can see from simply searching (many other have been deleted I'm sure):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/17904/how-to-download-torrents-from-the-office&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/24225/increasing-download-speed-for-torrents&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/20997/web-torrent-client-that-supports-monthly-traffic-limit&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/115807/why-has-my-torrent-slowed-down&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/31212/torrent-uploading-on-a-college-network&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Questions that I feel are OK**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/163959/how-can-i-make-upload-torrent-file&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;(This one kinda) http://superuser.com/questions/46903/downloading-movies-with-bit-torrent&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;http://superuser.com/questions/163920/in-torrent-what-is-seed-feed-peer" />
  <row Id="3275" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1597" RevisionGUID="9108b5a6-671b-4b7b-8ac8-ae50710c9e24" CreationDate="2010-10-19T07:43:50.493" UserId="289" Text="Torrents are a grey area.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;They have legitimate uses as well as the more common illegitimate ones so we have to treat each question on it's own merits." />
  <row Id="3276" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1598" RevisionGUID="cff5bae4-6943-4064-bf78-df479c1509f1" CreationDate="2010-10-20T15:35:40.660" UserId="46516" Text="Torrent URLs (like sites with warez and haxor in their URL) are an easy way to get Stack Exchange listed as NSFW in the Netnanny sense.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;My concern is that, all Legal Disclaimers aside, if the SuperUser site delves too much into Torrent functionality, even legal, it will be flagged for keywording torrent too much. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(...admittedly Slippery Slope argument) This will result in otherwise completely legitimate access of the site and community being blocked. I think that torrent software questions are likely to lead to torrent search engine questions, which needless to say is highly questionable on a legitimate site like this. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As such, torrent questions should not be acceptable outside of a specific protocol. For instance, if a user has a question about setting up a LAFS-Tahoe sharing cluster it would be permissible; if it is about somethig vague enough to need to use the term torrent it should be subject to strict moderator attention." />
  <row Id="3277" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1599" RevisionGUID="edd78eef-a909-4a28-9f40-3c9189fdefcf" CreationDate="2010-10-20T15:36:47.170" UserId="42315" Text="I can't see anything legally or morally objectionable in the questions you cite. The “kinda”&#xD;&#xA;one is a bit of an exception, but it asks about the legality.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mentions of specific torrent-related websites or communities that are known to practice copyright infringement would be a different matter. But such questions would tend to be off-topic here anyway, they're [Webapps.SE](http://webapps.stackexchange.com/)'s problem. Furthermore this wouldn't really be a matter for the community to decide, as the SE team must follow US legislation (since SE is hosted in the US) — it's up to them to edict a policy on US-legally dodgy topics. But again, questions purely about the technology are not concerned here.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There is no such thing as an intrinsically illegal or immoral technology. (I mean, there are mass mailing questions on SO and SF...) Please do not close or flag questions just because you think the answer may perhaps be used for illegal purposes.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3278" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1600" RevisionGUID="d55ba0c4-5825-4f50-b75b-52b5afebf161" CreationDate="2010-10-20T18:05:46.107" UserId="48198" Text="Saw that there were some contests a while ago and I would love to be able to purchase my own shirt as I was not a member of the community when the contests took place.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Does anybody know where I can buy one?" />
  <row Id="3279" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1600" RevisionGUID="d55ba0c4-5825-4f50-b75b-52b5afebf161" CreationDate="2010-10-20T18:05:46.107" UserId="48198" Text="Where can I purchase a superuser t-shirt?" />
  <row Id="3280" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1600" RevisionGUID="d55ba0c4-5825-4f50-b75b-52b5afebf161" CreationDate="2010-10-20T18:05:46.107" UserId="48198" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;super-contest&gt;&lt;t-shirt&gt;" />
  <row Id="3281" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1601" RevisionGUID="685a7231-5aac-43fd-a2cf-a8b857285ad6" CreationDate="2010-10-20T21:20:22.737" UserId="3981" Text="The only way to get a hold of one as far as I am aware is through competitions. On occasion the team will also send T-Shirts to users on Page 1 of the users list. Also keep your eye on the [blog](http://blog.stackexchange.com), Jeff on occasion will send T-Shirts to users who give good comments. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;There will be more contests in future. Continue being a positive and noticeable member and a T-Shirt will eventually find it's way to you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The T-Shirts aren't available for purchase. It makes them more exclusive that way." />
  <row Id="3282" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1602" RevisionGUID="48225e47-d776-411e-8b58-19a53a992333" CreationDate="2010-10-20T23:07:02.587" UserId="16582" Text="After checking out all the other StackExchange sites, CAD questions do not seem to fit into any category except maybe superuser. In the FAQ, superuser is described as encompassing general software or hardware troubleshooting, which is the closest fit to an application such as AutoCAD.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Mainly I'm asking this question because I searched for &quot;autocad&quot; and &quot;cad&quot; tags, of which there are very few, and neither have a tag wiki." />
  <row Id="3283" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1602" RevisionGUID="48225e47-d776-411e-8b58-19a53a992333" CreationDate="2010-10-20T23:07:02.587" UserId="16582" Text="Is superuser the proper channel to ask AutoCAD-related questions?" />
  <row Id="3284" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1602" RevisionGUID="48225e47-d776-411e-8b58-19a53a992333" CreationDate="2010-10-20T23:07:02.587" UserId="16582" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;&lt;appropriate&gt;" />
  <row Id="3285" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1603" RevisionGUID="9489a702-2985-42f9-a095-417506013ac8" CreationDate="2010-10-21T00:55:51.090" UserId="4377" Text="You can ask for questions on CAD provided it's not about recommended configurations/digitizers et al - although the response may *not* be like the others due to the niche category that CAD software belongs to" />
  <row Id="3286" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1602" RevisionGUID="eaf9e731-5c68-4abb-b6d1-bcfbf752ae1f" CreationDate="2010-10-21T00:56:05.177" UserId="4377" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;" />
  <row Id="3287" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1602" RevisionGUID="d434c6c1-166a-41f1-8994-5bb42ba0a409" CreationDate="2010-10-21T00:56:15.753" UserId="4377" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;allowed-topics&gt;" />
  <row Id="3288" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1604" RevisionGUID="bef4347a-1925-4c27-a189-d749b9c72c43" CreationDate="2010-10-21T12:40:52.680" UserId="12567" Text="I don't see a problem with questions about torrents what-so-ever. How the tools are used, does not matter (as long as it is not stated in the question). Otherwise we would have to engage the same rules to Cloning-Tools of all kind (including `dd`, because it could be used to make a clone of a copy-protected CD/DVD).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As long as the question goes like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &gt; How can I make my Torrent-Downloads faster?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;and not like this&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; &gt; I want to download $latest_movie_here, but it's so slow, why?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't see a problem with them. Sure, certain industries would like to see P2P sharing banned and criminalized completely without exceptions, but that's not the case." />
  <row Id="3289" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1605" RevisionGUID="fa62d057-3197-4450-b3bb-ccefa13da791" CreationDate="2010-10-21T16:29:05.733" UserId="49528" Text="If a user is new and receives down votes, they cannot get negative reputation (or even non-positive, i.e., 0) right? So if that user gets down votes, then earns reputation, does the loss of rep they would have earned from the down votes continue, effectively preventing them from earning rep until they have made up for those down votes, or is it simply lost when they are at 1?" />
  <row Id="3290" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1605" RevisionGUID="fa62d057-3197-4450-b3bb-ccefa13da791" CreationDate="2010-10-21T16:29:05.733" UserId="49528" Text="What is the effect of down votes on a low-rep user?" />
  <row Id="3291" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1605" RevisionGUID="fa62d057-3197-4450-b3bb-ccefa13da791" CreationDate="2010-10-21T16:29:05.733" UserId="49528" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;&lt;new-users&gt;" />
  <row Id="3292" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1606" RevisionGUID="5e955eae-5b2a-4e2c-bfe0-a06cc9bcfceb" CreationDate="2010-10-21T16:50:47.757" UserId="39366" Text="My understanding is that their normalised rep will not show any effect (as you say, that cannot drop below 1) but that it will effect their actual reputation. That is to say until their account's reputation is recalculated the effect will not be *seen* on the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if someone on 1 rep has 5 downvotes they will be on 1. An upvote will up them on 11. After a rep-recalc they will *really* be on 6.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not aware your actual rep can be see at http://superuser.com/reputation, although you can only see your own not others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some events (such as I describe here, but also deleted or migrated questions/answers among other things) cause the normalised rep stored and shown on the site to deviate from the actual value for the user." />
  <row Id="3297" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1608" RevisionGUID="a0c99d2f-4933-44f5-9335-753b2bdd5f1f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T08:11:57.503" UserId="289" Text="No.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Votes are always applied in order. So any down-vote after the user hits 1 has no effect on the users reputation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If a new user gets 5 down-votes followed by 1 up vote they'll have 11 points. This will be true even after a recalculation." />
  <row Id="3298" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1606" RevisionGUID="de79b244-0434-4e89-b7c9-cd61c28fa3a9" CreationDate="2010-10-22T08:40:36.160" UserId="39366" Comment="added 62 characters in body" Text="##Retracted due to inaccuracy; see comments&#xD;&#xA;&lt;strike&gt;My understanding is that their normalised rep will not show any effect (as you say, that cannot drop below 1) but that it will effect their actual reputation. That is to say until their account's reputation is recalculated the effect will not be *seen* on the site.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So if someone on 1 rep has 5 downvotes they will be on 1. An upvote will up them on 11. After a rep-recalc they will *really* be on 6.&lt;/strike&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you're not aware your actual rep can be see at http://superuser.com/reputation, although you can only see your own not others.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Some events (such as I describe here, but also deleted or migrated questions/answers among other things) cause the normalised rep stored and shown on the site to deviate from the actual value for the user." />
  <row Id="3299" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1609" RevisionGUID="c1ef636d-3460-4cb5-9fb1-9c75309df8cb" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:24:51.483" UserId="12567" Text="I just stumbled upon [this answer which suggest to use &quot;Windows XP Ultimate&quot;][1], which is in fact a Windows XP System modified by a Third-Party (read: Not Microsoft).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure about possible implications, since I don't know as what such Third-Party-Builds are considered if it comes to 'Warez'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ideas?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/145366/windows-repair-console-impossible/145442#145442" />
  <row Id="3300" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1609" RevisionGUID="c1ef636d-3460-4cb5-9fb1-9c75309df8cb" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:24:51.483" UserId="12567" Text="How to deal with an answer whcih suggest &quot;Windows XP Ultimate&quot; by Third-Party?" />
  <row Id="3301" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1609" RevisionGUID="c1ef636d-3460-4cb5-9fb1-9c75309df8cb" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:24:51.483" UserId="12567" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;software&gt;" />
  <row Id="3302" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1609" RevisionGUID="057e3810-b888-440d-8ab3-3c17fb61454b" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:31:25.777" UserId="12567" Comment="edited title" Text="How to deal with an answer which suggest &quot;Windows XP Ultimate&quot; by Third-Party?" />
  <row Id="3303" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1610" RevisionGUID="d128467b-1a0a-48d2-ad3b-9124007c4bce" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:36:29.047" UserId="118" Text="Specifically *my* [question][1]'s closure. It's not about mobile phones at all, it's just that I didn't know it was being closed at the time so I had no chance to &quot;defend&quot; it.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Thank you.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/183446/how-do-i-get-emoji" />
  <row Id="3304" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1610" RevisionGUID="d128467b-1a0a-48d2-ad3b-9124007c4bce" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:36:29.047" UserId="118" Text="How do you appeal a close decision?" />
  <row Id="3305" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1610" RevisionGUID="d128467b-1a0a-48d2-ad3b-9124007c4bce" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:36:29.047" UserId="118" Text="&lt;support&gt;" />
  <row Id="3306" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1611" RevisionGUID="a8a7edee-5514-412b-b378-4eb6280e4cc8" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:46:44.400" UserId="118" Text="**I've found the &quot;Flag&quot; link.**&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm assuming this is the correct avenue." />
  <row Id="3307" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1612" RevisionGUID="ce6c8c65-5c17-4ea5-8655-c64ad760a0fd" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:48:54.650" UserId="4377" Text="Flag it as spam. When it reaches 6 flags ( HEH! ) the answer will be auto deleted and the user will get a -100 rep punishment.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If you have enough [privileges][1], you can also edit out the offending link.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/privileges" />
  <row Id="3308" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1609" RevisionGUID="0064242d-9bd4-47b3-82b9-b7593037eb8a" CreationDate="2010-10-22T13:56:32.917" UserId="12567" Comment="Tried to clarify my question...I think I suck at english..." Text="I just stumbled upon [this answer which suggest to use &quot;Windows XP Ultimate&quot;][1], which is in fact a Windows XP System modified by a Third-Party (read: Not Microsoft).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure about possible implications, since I don't know as what such Third-Party-Builds are considered if it comes to 'Warez'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what to do with it? I know that illegal actions of any kind should be flagged and punished...but I have no idea where to place this nor if it is an illegal or off-topic action. So the basic question is, are Third-Party-Builds of Windows/MacOSX are considered illegal, or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/145366/windows-repair-console-impossible/145442#145442" />
  <row Id="3309" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1609" RevisionGUID="054ebc2f-9a6d-46d9-a909-da99df623599" CreationDate="2010-10-22T14:34:42.483" UserId="12567" Comment="Added some toughts." Text="I just stumbled upon [this answer which suggest to use &quot;Windows XP Ultimate&quot;][1], which is in fact a Windows XP System modified by a Third-Party (read: Not Microsoft).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure about possible implications, since I don't know as what such Third-Party-Builds are considered if it comes to 'Warez'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what to do with it? I know that illegal actions of any kind should be flagged and punished...but I have no idea where to place this nor if it is an illegal or off-topic action. So the basic question is, are Third-Party-Builds of Windows/MacOSX are considered illegal, or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** It seems like that is considered illegal because WPA and CD-Key-Activation was removed, though, that's a little thin because my arguments [about torrents come to mind][2]. You can still install Windows XP Ultimate and *own* Windows XP, so technically it wouldn't be illegal...difficult.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/145366/windows-repair-console-impossible/145442#145442&#xD;&#xA; [2]: http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1596/what-to-do-about-torrents/1604#1604" />
  <row Id="3310" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1613" RevisionGUID="64281c8a-c691-4563-bfcb-a9e7c1b4839e" CreationDate="2010-10-22T14:58:01.273" UserId="47225" Text="Think of it as your own software for a moment. After spending thousands of hours of software that you have perfected through coding and testing and coding and testing would you want someone to be altering that software at will?  More than that though, would you want someone to be distributing the software for free?  This is why the issue should be flagged or edited out as Sathya suggested. Taking away any legality issues it's just morally wrong  and Super User is dedicated to the promotion of useful and moral answers to today's (and yesterdays) issues. " />
  <row Id="3311" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1614" RevisionGUID="dd95eb97-1154-4c6e-92f3-0cf02c683b3c" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:38:07.153" UserId="14390" Text="When a question is closed by a moderator as a duplicate, I believe that a reference should be made within the area below that states where the original Q/A resides.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&lt;h2&gt;closed as exact duplicate by Fred, Wilma, Barney♦ 1 hour ago&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;This question covers exactly the same ground as earlier questions on this topic; its answers may be merged with another identical question.&#xD;&#xA;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;[Link to original question goes here][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.superuser.com" />
  <row Id="3312" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1614" RevisionGUID="dd95eb97-1154-4c6e-92f3-0cf02c683b3c" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:38:07.153" UserId="14390" Text="&quot;closed as exact duplicate by&quot; - suggestion" />
  <row Id="3313" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1614" RevisionGUID="dd95eb97-1154-4c6e-92f3-0cf02c683b3c" CreationDate="2010-10-22T15:38:07.153" UserId="14390" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;feature-request&gt;&lt;duplicates&gt;&lt;hyperlinks&gt;&lt;reference&gt;" />
  <row Id="3314" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1615" RevisionGUID="1fe2700b-4c94-4772-aba6-e9215774e1d4" CreationDate="2010-10-22T16:02:19.997" UserId="307" Text="The close reason is key. Editing for clarity and focus is the major option to look at.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Off-topic&#xD;&#xA;Edit the question to be relevant to the accepted topics for Super User. If it's about mobiles, eReaders or other electronic devices, but are not connected to the desktop or laptop, it's not on.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Subjective and argumentative&#xD;&#xA;If it was closed as subjective and argumentative, either trim the fat and boil it down to a specific problem that needs fixing or give it up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;###Not  a real question&#xD;&#xA;Edit in plenty of details and narrow the question scope to less than a grab bag of thoughts plucked from the clouds.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Comments are helpful, but the question content is the most vital aspect." />
  <row Id="3315" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1616" RevisionGUID="732d5e71-dc93-4313-abff-3a31dcb26e3e" CreationDate="2010-10-22T17:26:33.623" UserId="2013" Text="Do you mean like [this][1]  &#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or like [this][3]?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/202053/portable-virtual-machine-without-admin-priviliges-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/dFqUQ.jpg&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/201990/windows-keyboard-for-mac-closed&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.imgur.com/ScYKO.jpg" />
  <row Id="3316" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1617" RevisionGUID="074a019b-b7f0-4a04-a867-af20f653e54f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T21:02:25.453" UserId="22317" Text="I've been in the situation that I answered questions with more than one-liners, and the original poster didn't follow up at all (commenting what was wrong with the answers provided by me and others, etc.), and didn't accept an answer (not mine, not others').&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If I'm confident with my answers, I added comments to their question, suggesting they add to their questions, explaining why the answers don't satisfy them, or that they should accept an answer.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I've received a few accepted answers this way. It seems many just forget about their questions. Reminding them to accept or follow up on the answers improves question/answer quality and prevents them from being bumped up unnecessarily. Otoh, they might just accept to shut me up.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Is this abuse of the comment functionality? It's not mentioned in the `/privileges` explanation, so I'm asking here." />
  <row Id="3317" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1617" RevisionGUID="074a019b-b7f0-4a04-a867-af20f653e54f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T21:02:25.453" UserId="22317" Text="Following up using comments" />
  <row Id="3318" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1617" RevisionGUID="074a019b-b7f0-4a04-a867-af20f653e54f" CreationDate="2010-10-22T21:02:25.453" UserId="22317" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;comments&gt;" />
  <row Id="3319" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1618" RevisionGUID="7abd0535-e266-4b0f-8d10-098b0efe3b57" CreationDate="2010-10-22T21:41:05.890" UserId="4377" Text="&gt; Is this abuse of the comment functionality ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think so. The comments box are provided specifcally for this - for follow ups /clarifications and for the odd nudge." />
  <row Id="3320" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1609" RevisionGUID="dd5222b2-3972-412d-b7fc-9504f61f2885" CreationDate="2010-10-22T23:20:06.607" UserId="12567" Comment="added 41 characters in body" Text="I just stumbled upon [this answer which suggest to use &quot;Windows XP Ultimate&quot;][1], which is in fact a Windows XP System modified by a Third-Party (read: Not Microsoft).&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'm not sure about possible implications, since I don't know as what such Third-Party-Builds are considered if it comes to 'Warez'.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, what to do with it? I know that illegal actions of any kind should be flagged and punished...but I have no idea where to place this nor if it is an illegal or off-topic action. So the basic question is, are Third-Party-Builds of Windows/MacOSX are considered illegal, or not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit:** It seems like that is considered illegal because WPA and CD-Key-Activation was removed, though, that's a little thin because my arguments [about torrents come to mind][2]. You can still install Windows XP Ultimate and *own* Windows XP, so technically it wouldn't be illegal...difficult.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Edit2:** The linked answer is gone.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/145366/windows-repair-console-impossible/145442#145442&#xD;&#xA; [2]: http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1596/what-to-do-about-torrents/1604#1604" />
  <row Id="3325" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1620" RevisionGUID="6ab01022-ec3d-4825-b030-02c9aa552b2f" CreationDate="2010-10-25T18:53:54.837" UserId="12567" Text="As [Hello71][1] pointed out, it helps in such cases to read the EULA.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Microsoft Windows Home EULA][2], Section 1.2:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; There are technological measures in this Software that are designed to prevent unlicensed use of the Software. Microsoft will use those measures to confirm you have a legally licensed copy of the Software. If you are not using a licensed copy of the Software, you are not allowed to install the Software or future Software updates. Microsoft will not collect any personally identifiable information from your Workstation Computer during this process. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Section 4:&#xD;&#xA;&gt; You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, yes, Windows XP Ultimate is with a pretty good possibility a violation of the EULA and there for off-limits on SE.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; [1]: http://meta.superuser.com/users/36565/hello71&#xD;&#xA; [2]: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/eula/home.mspx" />
  <row Id="3326" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1621" RevisionGUID="20bfbdf7-7ba0-46d8-88eb-766c7c7a714b" CreationDate="2010-10-25T19:29:55.290" UserId="47225" Text="I've on occasion come across the answer to my [question](http://superuser.com/questions/203186/laptop-battery-technology), and feel that it's the best answer, but do not want to &quot;rob&quot; anyone of rightfully earned rep... What do I do?  Also I'm assuming that I do NOT receive rep for my acceptance of my own answer.  " />
  <row Id="3327" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1621" RevisionGUID="20bfbdf7-7ba0-46d8-88eb-766c7c7a714b" CreationDate="2010-10-25T19:29:55.290" UserId="47225" Text="Is it kosher to accept your answer on your own question?" />
  <row Id="3328" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1621" RevisionGUID="20bfbdf7-7ba0-46d8-88eb-766c7c7a714b" CreationDate="2010-10-25T19:29:55.290" UserId="47225" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;questions&gt;&lt;accepted-answer&gt;" />
  <row Id="3329" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1622" RevisionGUID="166aa456-9bc3-4471-b8a5-dbb1cb4bce0d" CreationDate="2010-10-25T19:38:02.237" UserId="1548" Text="Yes it is, but generally I recommend you gives others at least 24 or 48 hours to try and get an answer in.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Who knows? Perhaps someone else even has a better answer, but they might be scared away if you already provided and accepted one!" />
  <row Id="3330" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1623" RevisionGUID="c135e643-4e2d-43e1-98df-aa09f7c45508" CreationDate="2010-10-25T19:47:58.947" UserId="4377" Text="There's nothing wrong with accepting your own answer as such I've done it [before][1]. The caveats being &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA; - If you're going to answer your own question - it would be wise to leave a comment stating the same lest someone gets offended ( I'm not saying they will )&#xD;&#xA; - Wait for a while before posting - as Ivo mentioned - who knows! Somebody might come with a better solution!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/47875/itunes-limitations-with-respect-to-filetypes" />
  <row Id="3331" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1624" RevisionGUID="9eff1481-7193-47ca-b3a6-25271921e5d3" CreationDate="2010-10-27T01:46:44.093" UserId="48807" Text="I see people use it but I do not see it listed in the [markdown help][1] nor in the toolbar.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Looks like this:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.superuser.com/editing-help&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/QtdnL.png" />
  <row Id="3332" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1624" RevisionGUID="9eff1481-7193-47ca-b3a6-25271921e5d3" CreationDate="2010-10-27T01:46:44.093" UserId="48807" Text="What kind of syntax is used to specify a button?" />
  <row Id="3333" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1624" RevisionGUID="9eff1481-7193-47ca-b3a6-25271921e5d3" CreationDate="2010-10-27T01:46:44.093" UserId="48807" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;markdown&gt;" />
  <row Id="3334" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1625" RevisionGUID="b3eabad4-c799-4aae-884a-4fb5fb5bf175" CreationDate="2010-10-27T01:50:30.393" UserId="48807" Text="I was trying to figure out [how users markdown a button][1] but I do not see a &quot;view source&quot; button. I could of **sworn** I've been able to see the source of a post before... somehow. Am I bugging out?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Maybe it is not available in some posts? If so, why not?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1624/what-kind-of-syntax-is-used-to-specify-a-button" />
  <row Id="3335" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1625" RevisionGUID="b3eabad4-c799-4aae-884a-4fb5fb5bf175" CreationDate="2010-10-27T01:50:30.393" UserId="48807" Text="How do I view the markdown source for a post?" />
  <row Id="3336" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1625" RevisionGUID="b3eabad4-c799-4aae-884a-4fb5fb5bf175" CreationDate="2010-10-27T01:50:30.393" UserId="48807" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;markdown&gt;" />
  <row Id="3337" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1626" RevisionGUID="727e2029-505a-4a22-b6ee-3d5a791b44a9" CreationDate="2010-10-27T01:59:09.023" UserId="14827" Text="That is probably the `&lt;kbd&gt;` HTML tag:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* code:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;        &lt;kbd&gt;Compose&lt;/kbd&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;* result:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    &lt;kbd&gt;Compose&lt;/kbd&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The outline part of the formatting is [disabled on MSO](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/1939/kbd-elements-are-way-intrusive/23571#23571) (and MSU, is seems) due to people abusing it to draw pictures and such." />
  <row Id="3338" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1627" RevisionGUID="e7c1cf61-bb3b-4dae-896e-811275b66ecb" CreationDate="2010-10-27T02:29:34.327" UserId="4377" Text="Kinda tricky, but from the permalink of the question [ `http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1625/how-do-i-view-the-markdown-source-for-a-post` ] replace `questions` with posts and replace the part after the number ( ie, `/how-do-i-view-the-markdown-source-for-a-post`) with `/revisions`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the link becomes http://meta.superuser.com/posts/1625/revisions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, in general, `http://&lt;site&gt;/questions/&lt;n&gt;/&lt;blargh&gt;` becomes `http://&lt;site&gt;/posts/&lt;n&gt;/revisions`" />
  <row Id="3339" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1627" RevisionGUID="6e9ae607-e78b-4fd4-a75e-93f009d14519" CreationDate="2010-10-27T02:37:16.583" UserId="4377" Comment="added 794 characters in body; added 47 characters in body" Text="Kinda tricky, but from the permalink of the question [ `http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1625/how-do-i-view-the-markdown-source-for-a-post` ] replace `questions` with posts and replace the part after the number ( ie, `/how-do-i-view-the-markdown-source-for-a-post`) with `/revisions`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the link becomes http://meta.superuser.com/posts/1625/revisions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, in general, `http://&lt;site&gt;/questions/&lt;n&gt;/&lt;blargh&gt;` becomes `http://&lt;site&gt;/posts/&lt;n&gt;/revisions`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For answers, the concept remains the same, except you'll have to replace &lt;n&gt; in the above link with the post number for the answer, which is the number appended **after** the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, this answer link is http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1625/how-do-i-view-the-markdown-source-for-a-post/1627#1627 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get the revisions view, the link is  http://meta.superuser.com/posts/1627/revisions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you get the revisions view just click on `View Source`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AFAIR, the view source link was available only on Revisions view - which is available on a single click if the question/answer has been edited. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For others, the above link will open the revisions view and you can select the source from there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://i.imgur.com/pdT1N.png&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://i.imgur.com/kkPZ9.png" />
  <row Id="3340" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1627" RevisionGUID="8aeef9c7-b511-4734-9319-38a6b76a3f84" CreationDate="2010-10-27T02:43:22.587" UserId="4377" Comment="Nothing in meta is complete without 'em freehand circles!" Text="Kinda tricky, but from the permalink of the questions [ `http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1625/how-do-i-view-the-markdown-source-for-a-post` ] replace `questions` with posts and replace the part after the number ( ie, `/how-do-i-view-the-markdown-source-for-a-post`) with `/revisions`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So the link becomes http://meta.superuser.com/posts/1625/revisions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, in general, `http://&lt;site&gt;/questions/&lt;n&gt;/&lt;blargh&gt;` becomes `http://&lt;site&gt;/posts/&lt;n&gt;/revisions`&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;-----&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For answers, the concept remains the same, except you'll have to replace &lt;n&gt; in the above link with the post number for the answer, which is the number appended **after** the question.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;So, this answer link is http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1625/how-do-i-view-the-markdown-source-for-a-post/1627#1627 &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;To get the revisions view, the link is  http://meta.superuser.com/posts/1627/revisions&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;---&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Once you get the revisions view just click on `View Source`.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;AFAIR, the view source link was available only on Revisions view - which is available on a single click if the question/answer has been edited. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;For others, the above link will open the revisions view and you can select the source from there.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://i.imgur.com/pdT1N.png&#xD;&#xA;[2]: http://i.imgur.com/kkPZ9.png" />
  <row Id="3343" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1628" RevisionGUID="b8e04364-84fa-493a-991c-bc8d82c4dc9d" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:34:01.013" UserId="17199" Text="Maybe I stupidly missed the explanation somewhere...   When I set some ignored tag (under &quot;interesting tags&quot;) - just how does this affect my experience on SuperUser?" />
  <row Id="3344" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1628" RevisionGUID="b8e04364-84fa-493a-991c-bc8d82c4dc9d" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:34:01.013" UserId="17199" Text="Exactly what does &quot;ignored tags&quot; do?" />
  <row Id="3345" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1628" RevisionGUID="b8e04364-84fa-493a-991c-bc8d82c4dc9d" CreationDate="2010-10-28T02:34:01.013" UserId="17199" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="3346" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1629" RevisionGUID="efafd330-dead-4a98-ac1f-479e42fed904" CreationDate="2010-10-28T03:50:28.320" UserId="4377" Text="Questions on ignored tags are a bit faded out&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The first question contains one of my &quot;interesting&quot; tags, the last one contains one of my ignored tags. The ones in between are &quot;normal&quot;, in the sense that I haven't mentioned whether I find the tags interesting or not.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[1]: http://i.imgur.com/9ts7j.png" />
  <row Id="3347" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1494" RevisionGUID="7695d9e9-42f3-4c01-a3dd-534522f13143" CreationDate="2010-10-28T06:19:57.590" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-norepro&gt;" />
  <row Id="3348" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1378" RevisionGUID="2325a404-73b9-4ef5-8469-471481233824" CreationDate="2010-10-28T06:20:41.210" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="3349" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1233" RevisionGUID="eda2dca3-fa3a-4a0b-9fc3-06bc8eeca265" CreationDate="2010-10-28T06:20:56.763" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;answers&gt;&lt;notification&gt;" />
  <row Id="3350" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="817" RevisionGUID="9232e3b6-24b0-46ef-a8d8-68d783fc9d7f" CreationDate="2010-10-28T06:21:49.930" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-norepro&gt;&lt;layout&gt;" />
  <row Id="3351" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1013" RevisionGUID="b8731349-fdca-45ce-87a7-4374bfc41108" CreationDate="2010-10-28T06:22:10.087" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;voting&gt;" />
  <row Id="3352" PostHistoryTypeId="12" PostId="607" RevisionGUID="ebb2230f-968f-42d8-a286-fcb08b632583" CreationDate="2010-10-28T06:22:18.557" UserId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3353" PostHistoryTypeId="13" PostId="607" RevisionGUID="4e6ad95b-0fa7-44b5-b25b-9b0377dcaef9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T06:22:25.953" UserId="1" Text="[{&quot;Id&quot;:1,&quot;DisplayName&quot;:&quot;Jeff Atwood&quot;}]" />
  <row Id="3354" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1007" RevisionGUID="67e9963e-9adc-4b69-9703-ae23bec3986d" CreationDate="2010-10-28T06:34:14.193" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-bydesign&gt;&lt;reputation&gt;" />
  <row Id="3355" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="731" RevisionGUID="5320a678-12f2-4fc6-aeec-7e71b7eb9fd0" CreationDate="2010-10-28T06:34:51.337" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;bug&gt;&lt;status-completed&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="3356" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="607" RevisionGUID="f975a5fb-ada3-46e5-9afc-d66724af6cd6" CreationDate="2010-10-28T06:35:15.377" UserId="1" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;openid&gt;&lt;login&gt;" />
  <row Id="3357" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1630" RevisionGUID="d68994cf-4cf4-4ce4-a05f-e6e6fd6c333a" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:35:58.923" UserId="52492" Text="I commented on a question some days ago.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Recently the StackExchange widget showed a red icon, clicking it showed&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; comment on &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; grep results in putty&#xD;&#xA;&gt; (windows 7) terminal change depending&#xD;&#xA;&gt; on width of terminal &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; i guarantee that&#xD;&#xA;&gt; the lines are different, not just&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;When I click on this I am taken to a SuperUser &quot;page not found&quot; page.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Has the Q been moved? If so, why is stack exchange directing me to the wrong place?" />
  <row Id="3358" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1630" RevisionGUID="d68994cf-4cf4-4ce4-a05f-e6e6fd6c333a" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:35:58.923" UserId="52492" Text="Disappearing question" />
  <row Id="3359" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1630" RevisionGUID="d68994cf-4cf4-4ce4-a05f-e6e6fd6c333a" CreationDate="2010-10-28T09:35:58.923" UserId="52492" Text="&lt;bug&gt;" />
  <row Id="3360" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1631" RevisionGUID="b63a8579-7349-4d5c-ad9c-f100e11b52f7" CreationDate="2010-10-28T11:11:28.423" UserId="9350" Text="Stack Exchange management wrote a big post about **why it makes sense to spin off some topics or areas into their own stack sites.** If I have an Ubuntu question, it would make sense to ask it in the Ubuntu site. If it's a WordPress question, there's a site for that too. And Apple questions, there's a site for that. Let each expert focus on his area. This all makes sense to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What doesn't make sense is that there are so many questions regarding such areas still popping up here on SU. **Why is it even allowed to post Mac questions on SU?** Or Linux questions? Or Gmail questions? Why aren't they closed and the asker referred to their respective stack site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand why people do this. Of course I'd prefer to post my question to a SU audience of ~40000 rather than to an Apple audience of ~1400 -- the more people see my question, the better answer I'd get. But this is **exactly contrary** to the Stack Exchange management's arguments! So what gives?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I want guidelines that people can understand and follow.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Either** allow questions even on topics for which other sites exist -- and never ever close them! --  &#xD;&#xA;**or** close such questions immediately and refer the askers to the proper sites!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll appreciate any comments and explanations. " />
  <row Id="3361" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1631" RevisionGUID="b63a8579-7349-4d5c-ad9c-f100e11b52f7" CreationDate="2010-10-28T11:11:28.423" UserId="9350" Text="It annoys me that there's an Apple SE but so many Apple questions on SU" />
  <row Id="3362" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1631" RevisionGUID="b63a8579-7349-4d5c-ad9c-f100e11b52f7" CreationDate="2010-10-28T11:11:28.423" UserId="9350" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="3363" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1630" RevisionGUID="79613620-39a8-4ef6-af5a-34067321dfb9" CreationDate="2010-10-28T11:38:21.347" UserId="52492" Comment="clarify title" Text="StackExchange widget links to 404" />
  <row Id="3364" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1631" RevisionGUID="dd02aa2c-873a-4c80-97bb-76bc09b242bf" CreationDate="2010-10-28T12:35:38.557" UserId="9350" Comment="Added hyperlinks." Text="Stack Exchange management wrote a big post about **why it makes sense to spin off some topics or areas into their own stack sites.** If I have an Ubuntu question, it would make sense to ask it in the Ubuntu site. If it's a WordPress question, there's a site for that too. And Apple questions, there's a site for that. Let each expert focus on his area. This all makes sense to me.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;What doesn't make sense is that there are so many questions regarding such areas still popping up here on SU. **Why is it even allowed to post Mac questions on SU?** Or Linux questions? Or Gmail questions? Why aren't they closed and the asker referred to their respective stack site?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I understand why people do this. Of course I'd prefer to post my question to a SU audience of ~40000 rather than to an Apple audience of ~1400 -- the more people see my question, the better answer I'd get. But this is **exactly contrary** to the Stack Exchange management's arguments! So what gives?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**I want guidelines that people can understand and follow.** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Either** allow questions even on topics for which other sites exist -- and never ever close them! --  &#xD;&#xA;**or** close such questions immediately and refer the askers to the proper sites!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I'll appreciate any comments and explanations. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[Some][1] [obvious][2] [Apple][3] [questions][4], [some][7] [obvious][8] [Ubuntu][9] [questions][10]. (random examples)&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/202834/led-cinema-display-calibration&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://superuser.com/questions/202731/is-the-2010-apple-macbook-air-4gb-memory-upgrade-worth-it&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/200877/connect-macbook-pro-unibody-to-apple-cinema-display&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://superuser.com/questions/204287/what-characters-are-forbidden-in-os-x-filenames&#xD;&#xA;  [5]: http://superuser.com/questions/203138/backtick-on-a-macbook-pros-keyboard&#xD;&#xA;  [6]: http://superuser.com/questions/202961/my-mac-shuts-down-for-no-apparent-reason&#xD;&#xA;  [7]: http://superuser.com/questions/203973/how-host-a-ssh-server-in-ubuntu&#xD;&#xA;  [8]: http://superuser.com/questions/203894/need-a-download-manager-for-ubuntu-over-network&#xD;&#xA;  [9]: http://superuser.com/questions/203743/compiz-gone-with-ubuntu-10-10-upgrade-on-virtualbox-win7-64-host&#xD;&#xA;  [10]: http://superuser.com/questions/202892/ubuntu-network-share-fails-to-mount-cant-get-to-command-prompt-on-boot" />
  <row Id="3365" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1632" RevisionGUID="17b155f2-8d82-4699-839c-0172288ad1de" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:55:08.983" UserId="4377" Text="The question has been deleted by the owner of the question." />
  <row Id="3366" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1630" RevisionGUID="5bbf8ebd-8881-49a2-9131-780b4c75a753" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:55:57.857" UserId="4377" Comment="edited tags" Text="&lt;support&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;" />
  <row Id="3367" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1633" RevisionGUID="aad8988a-d19f-44a9-b2f7-64906c2a7514" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:43:15.930" UserId="4377" Text="There are (currently) 18 questions tagged [`missing`][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][2]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;And 13 questions tagged [`disappeared`][3]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;![alt text][4]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Am I right in believing that these tags are meta-tags and need to be wiped off ?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/missing&#xD;&#xA;  [2]: http://i.imgur.com/T69Aj.png&#xD;&#xA;  [3]: http://superuser.com/questions/tagged/disappeared&#xD;&#xA;  [4]: http://i.imgur.com/eq2bR.png" />
  <row Id="3368" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1633" RevisionGUID="aad8988a-d19f-44a9-b2f7-64906c2a7514" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:43:15.930" UserId="4377" Text="Do [missing] and [disappeared] constitute as meta tags?" />
  <row Id="3369" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1633" RevisionGUID="aad8988a-d19f-44a9-b2f7-64906c2a7514" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:43:15.930" UserId="4377" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;tags&gt;" />
  <row Id="3370" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1634" RevisionGUID="6d8ba951-188c-4dc5-800f-2438d9444d9e" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:08:40.787" UserId="9666" Text="Yes, I think this is a meta tag based on the [criteria of Jeff Atwood](http://meta.superuser.com/questions/1376/is-data-an-useful-tag-do-we-need-it-what-should-we-do) and [his blog post](http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 1) could you have a question with ONLY this tag  &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I don't think so, [missing-files] and [data-loss] are better than [missing], [data] and [loss].&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt; 2) does the tag commonly mean different things to different people&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Yes, people are left to wonder what is missing.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;----------&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;As [disappeared] is just a synonym tag to [missing] it is also a meta tag.&#xD;&#xA;" />
  <row Id="3371" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1636" RevisionGUID="ba162008-8dec-4ca1-be8e-7d33ac0c0190" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:43:16.123" UserId="52492" Text="It obviously depends on character sets and fonts. [°} I'm sure there must be many Unicode characters that would server that purpose." />
  <row Id="3372" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1637" RevisionGUID="5223d764-83c3-41ca-8445-1d3e0a12d4ae" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:55:44.793" UserId="4386" Text="[•} Super **user**&#xD;&#xA;--&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Ok - Kind of lame, I'll try to do better!" />
  <row Id="3373" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1638" RevisionGUID="51967dda-8eaa-4661-925d-ee57bcd3491b" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:05:42.003" UserId="45412" Text="I don't think the spacing would work regardless, its not possible to get the eye dot inside of the bracket the way it is in the logo." />
  <row Id="3374" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1639" RevisionGUID="f15b092a-323a-47d6-bd91-bc0d136db1bc" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:13:18.550" UserId="47225" Text="&gt;**[**'***}*** &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;*['}* &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;or&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&gt;['}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;is the best that I got." />
  <row Id="3375" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1640" RevisionGUID="e2b7089b-a282-4f04-8fd9-0002cee731b2" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:21:26.483" UserId="39366" Text="The horizontal spacing is off, and obviously the curly bracket doesn't have the vertical asymmetry of the real icon, but how about the following?&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;#[&lt;sup&gt;*•*&lt;/sup&gt;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Here's a smaller version, which has better horizontal spacing, assuming you can see it:  &#xD;&#xA;[&lt;sup&gt;*•*&lt;/sup&gt;}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;However, this is a *bit* of a cheat as I'm using a unicode dot ( • ) and then making it superscript *and* italic..." />
  <row Id="3376" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1641" RevisionGUID="81eef56c-5b09-4a63-b828-9c9672fc09b1" CreationDate="2010-10-28T15:23:55.100" UserId="52246" Text="The best I got is [·} which was done with the 'middle dot' (Alt+0183) I don't think the spacing allow you to actually create the logo just the ASCII chars&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you take a close look at the logo, the curly braket is different on top and bottom. There's a forehead and a chin " />
  <row Id="3377" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1635" RevisionGUID="4efcee63-cc51-4610-be90-f820d41dade6" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:27:21.340" UserDisplayName="user52032" Text="The superuser logo ha a square bracket and a curly bracket. is there a keyboard or ascii character for the &quot;eye&quot; dot?" />
  <row Id="3378" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1635" RevisionGUID="4efcee63-cc51-4610-be90-f820d41dade6" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:27:21.340" UserDisplayName="user52032" Text="How do I create the Super User Logo in text?" />
  <row Id="3379" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1635" RevisionGUID="4efcee63-cc51-4610-be90-f820d41dade6" CreationDate="2010-10-28T14:27:21.340" UserDisplayName="user52032" Text="&lt;logo&gt;" />
  <row Id="3380" PostHistoryTypeId="17" PostId="1635" RevisionGUID="84d607b2-a132-4a52-bf5b-98ecfffa7723" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:46:28.053" UserId="-1" Comment="from http://superuser.com/questions/204351/how-do-i-create-the-super-user-logo-in-text" Text="" />
  <row Id="3381" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1642" RevisionGUID="9fc32778-d033-40dc-b549-0074ccbb2f92" CreationDate="2010-10-28T16:52:30.643" UserId="3981" Text="Your wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Super User will always allow Ubuntu and Apple question, and I doubt we will ever see options to migrate to these sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Super User caters for a much broader audience.&#xD;&#xA;- Super User doesn't allow questions on devices like the iPhone and iPod&#xD;&#xA;- Super User's tend to own both Mac, Windows and Linux machines&#xD;&#xA;- Super User has a very different community atmosphere and attitude&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key is really the community itself. I used the Ubuntu SE for a while, and completely dislike the community and the way they deal with questions. Jeff has also agreed that there is no need to not allow these questions, and if you prefer to use the Ubuntu and Apple sites you can, however if you believe your a Super User then asking here is also perfect as long as it is within the scope of the FAQ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;None of the new SE sites where created to compete with any of the Trilogy sites, rather, they co-exists to enhance these sites and cater for the unique communities around those topics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, there is no way we will be migrating old questions that were asked before SE 2.0 existed to the new sites. Migration paths will only be created if they truly compliment the other site, like the case with WebApps. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Super User doesn't and won't discriminate against question which are on topic and relevant irrelevant of the OS choice or the hardware make or type.**" />
  <row Id="3382" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1641" RevisionGUID="2c4913d2-0ae9-4688-9fb1-668d8066d32a" CreationDate="2010-10-28T19:49:26.440" UserId="52246" Comment="typo" Text="The best I got is [·} which was done with the 'middle dot' (Alt+0183) I don't think the spacing will allow you to actually create the logo just the ASCII chars&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Also, if you take a close look at the logo, the curly braket is different on top and bottom. There's a forehead and a chin " />
  <row Id="3383" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1643" RevisionGUID="aa0cf849-113b-4b6b-83f8-e367fb5e2545" CreationDate="2010-10-28T21:28:55.690" UserId="36565" Text="[*˙*}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Closest I can get. [ + DOT ABOVE (U+02D9) (italic) + } Eye should probably be slightly lower and to the left, but whatever." />
  <row Id="3384" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1642" RevisionGUID="37172764-4330-4059-b14b-ea485f537878" CreationDate="2010-10-28T22:59:36.617" UserId="4377" Comment="added 2 characters in body" Text="You're wrong.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Super User will always allow Ubuntu and Apple question, and I doubt we will ever see options to migrate to these sites.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;- Super User caters for a much broader audience.&#xD;&#xA;- Super User doesn't allow questions on devices like the iPhone and iPod&#xD;&#xA;- Super User's tend to own both Mac, Windows and Linux machines&#xD;&#xA;- Super User has a very different community atmosphere and attitude&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The key is really the community itself. I used the Ubuntu SE for a while, and completely dislike the community and the way they deal with questions. Jeff has also agreed that there is no need to not allow these questions, and if you prefer to use the Ubuntu and Apple sites you can, however if you believe your a Super User then asking here is also perfect as long as it is within the scope of the FAQ.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;None of the new SE sites where created to compete with any of the Trilogy sites, rather, they co-exists to enhance these sites and cater for the unique communities around those topics.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Furthermore, there is no way we will be migrating old questions that were asked before SE 2.0 existed to the new sites. Migration paths will only be created if they truly compliment the other site, like the case with WebApps. &#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;**Super User doesn't and won't discriminate against question which are on topic and relevant irrelevant of the OS choice or the hardware make or type.**" />
  <row Id="3385" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1644" RevisionGUID="06f07c65-59f7-4fee-839f-1584b0fbcab0" CreationDate="2010-10-29T08:18:25.947" UserId="7891" Text="[}&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;(It's his day off, and he's lying in)" />
  <row Id="3386" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1645" RevisionGUID="e7abba8b-457a-4ffa-bceb-03975e3daf1d" CreationDate="2010-10-29T08:52:05.530" UserId="52032" Text="I'd comment but I don't seem to be able but I just wnt to say thank you to you all for your answers, If I had a prize I'd share  equally between Wil and DMA36571" />
  <row Id="3387" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1646" RevisionGUID="ff58a742-6c03-47ab-9be6-b9cb9d4766f9" CreationDate="2010-10-29T09:39:31.277" UserId="33924" Text="This is getting plain ridiculous:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;http://www.picpaste.com/SuperUser-4jzGSP03.png&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this isn't a question about computer software (support for it) then I give up! I even took the time out to answer another PSP related question and I even thought about creating a wiki for it as suggested.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But not now if this is the kind of knee jerk INSTANT (it was closed almost as fast as I raised it) and really makes SuperUser a real turn off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rob." />
  <row Id="3388" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1646" RevisionGUID="ff58a742-6c03-47ab-9be6-b9cb9d4766f9" CreationDate="2010-10-29T09:39:31.277" UserId="33924" Text="This is getting rediculous" />
  <row Id="3389" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1646" RevisionGUID="ff58a742-6c03-47ab-9be6-b9cb9d4766f9" CreationDate="2010-10-29T09:39:31.277" UserId="33924" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;" />
  <row Id="3390" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1646" RevisionGUID="e4c753ba-3f18-4919-bece-93a4290f91b0" CreationDate="2010-10-29T09:48:15.577" UserId="2013" Comment="added link to question under discussion" Text="This is getting plain ridiculous:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://superuser.com/questions/204710/what-happened-to-the-corel-forums-for-paintshop-pro-closed][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this isn't a question about computer software (support for it) then I give up! I even took the time out to answer another PSP related question and I even thought about creating a wiki for it as suggested.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But not now if this is the kind of knee jerk INSTANT (it was closed almost as fast as I raised it) and really makes SuperUser a real turn off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;Rob.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/204710/what-happened-to-the-corel-forums-for-paintshop-pro-closed" />
  <row Id="3391" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1647" RevisionGUID="94a02b8d-6c08-47b1-9ac7-d64013fa948a" CreationDate="2010-10-29T09:53:18.723" UserId="12567" Text=" &gt; If this isn't a question about computer software (support for it) then I give up!&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;No, it wasn't about software/computer support.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;I suggest you read the [FAQ](http://superuser.com/faq):&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    [SuperUser is about ... ] and it is not about ...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    * websites or web services like Facebook, Twitter, and WordPress&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;The question was clearly about a website, there for off-topic, there for closed." />
  <row Id="3392" PostHistoryTypeId="5" PostId="1646" RevisionGUID="bb0cde33-031f-4a52-a2e4-f936572c535d" CreationDate="2010-10-29T13:08:07.810" UserId="4377" Comment="deleted 6 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="This is getting plain ridiculous:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;[http://superuser.com/questions/204710/what-happened-to-the-corel-forums-for-paintshop-pro-closed][1]&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;If this isn't a question about computer software (support for it) then I give up! I even took the time out to answer another PSP related question and I even thought about creating a wiki for it as suggested.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;But not now if this is the kind of knee jerk INSTANT (it was closed almost as fast as I raised it) and really makes SuperUser a real turn off.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  [1]: http://superuser.com/questions/204710/what-happened-to-the-corel-forums-for-paintshop-pro-closed" />
  <row Id="3393" PostHistoryTypeId="4" PostId="1646" RevisionGUID="bb0cde33-031f-4a52-a2e4-f936572c535d" CreationDate="2010-10-29T13:08:07.810" UserId="4377" Comment="deleted 6 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="Why was this question closed ?" />
  <row Id="3394" PostHistoryTypeId="6" PostId="1646" RevisionGUID="bb0cde33-031f-4a52-a2e4-f936572c535d" CreationDate="2010-10-29T13:08:07.810" UserId="4377" Comment="deleted 6 characters in body; edited tags; edited title" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;specific-question&gt;&lt;closed-questions&gt;" />
  <row Id="3395" PostHistoryTypeId="2" PostId="1648" RevisionGUID="f549f69f-1c52-4463-85cd-b7855f1cb5f1" CreationDate="2010-10-30T15:04:35.793" UserId="36565" Text="From http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/the-death-of-meta-tags/:&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;  1. If the tag can’t work as the only tag on a question, it’s probably a meta-tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    Clearly, `[error]` and `[problem]` fit this criterion.&#xD;&#xA;  2. If the tag commonly means different things to different people, it’s probably a meta-tag.&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `[error]` is more for error messages, so no, but...&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;    `[problem]` is more subjective. What may be a problem to some people is a benefit to another." />
  <row Id="3396" PostHistoryTypeId="1" PostId="1648" RevisionGUID="f549f69f-1c52-4463-85cd-b7855f1cb5f1" CreationDate="2010-10-30T15:04:35.793" UserId="36565" Text="Are &quot;error&quot; and &quot;problem&quot; meta-tags?" />
  <row Id="3397" PostHistoryTypeId="3" PostId="1648" RevisionGUID="f549f69f-1c52-4463-85cd-b7855f1cb5f1" CreationDate="2010-10-30T15:04:35.793" UserId="36565" Text="&lt;discussion&gt;&lt;support&gt;&lt;tags&gt;&lt;meta-tags&gt;" />
</posthistory>